The data from internet are dispersed in multiple documents or web pag-es. Most of them are not properly structured and organized. It becomes necessary to organize these contents in order to improve the search results by increasing the relevancy. The semantic web technologies and ontologies play a vital role in in-formation extraction and new knowledge discovery from the web documents. This paper suggests a model for storing the web content in an organized and structured manner in RDF format. The information extraction techniques and the ontologies developed for the domain together discovers new knowledge. The paper also proves that the time taken for inferring the new knowledge is also minimal compared to manual effort when semantic web technologies are used while developing the applications.

1. Sundarapandian et al. (Eds) : ACITY, AIAA, CNSA, DPPR, NeCoM, WeST, DMS, P2PTM, VLSI - 2013
pp. 193–200, 2013. © CS & IT-CSCP 2013 DOI : 10.5121/csit.2013.3420
A SEMANTIC BASED APPROACH FOR
KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND
ACQUISITION FROM MULTIPLE WEB
PAGES USING ONTOLOGIES
A.M.Abirami1
, Dr.A.Askarunisa2
1
Department of Information Technology,
Thiagarajar College of Engineering,
Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India,
abiramiam@tce.edu
2
Department of Computer Science and Engineering,
Vickram College of Engineering,
Enathi, Tamil Nadu, India
nishanazer@yahoo.com
ABSTRACT
The data from internet are dispersed in multiple documents or web pag-es. Most of them are not
properly structured and organized. It becomes necessary to organize these contents in order to
improve the search results by increasing the relevancy. The semantic web technologies and
ontologies play a vital role in in-formation extraction and new knowledge discovery from the
web documents. This paper suggests a model for storing the web content in an organized and
structured manner in RDF format. The information extraction techniques and the ontologies
developed for the domain together discovers new knowledge. The paper also proves that the
time taken for inferring the new knowledge is also minimal compared to manual effort when
semantic web technologies are used while developing the applications.
1. INTRODUCTION
The World Wide Web has many documents which includes both relevant and irrelevant
information. It becomes the user’s responsibility to disregard unnecessary data and considers the
necessary information. Also some web pages have unstructured or semi-structured textual content
and the user needs to aggregate or segregate information based on his search needs. So
Information Extraction from the web documents becomes predominant now-a-days.
The use of semantic web technologies like RDF, OWL, SPARQL, etc enables the information
retrieval and extraction easier. A core data representation format for semantic web is Resource
Description Framework (RDF). RDF is a data model for web pages. RDF is a framework for
representing information about resources in a graph form. It was primarily intended for

2. 194 Computer Science & Information Technology (CS & IT)
representing metadata about WWW resources, such as the title, author, and modification date of a
Web page, but it can be used for storing any other data. It is based on triples subject-predicate-
object that form graph of data [21].
All data in the semantic web use RDF as the primary representation language [16]. RDF Schema
(RDFS) can be used to describe taxonomies of classes and properties and use them to create
lightweight ontologies. Ontologies describe the conceptualization, the structure of the domain,
which includes the domain model with possible restrictions [18]. More detailed ontologies can be
created with Web Ontology Language (OWL). It is syntactically embedded into RDF, so like
RDFS, it provides additional standardized vocabulary. For querying RDF data as well as RDFS
and OWL ontologies with knowledge bases, a Simple Protocol and RDF Query Language
(SPARQL) is available. SPARQL is SQL-like language, but uses RDF triples and resources for
both matching part of the query and for returning results [17]. With the help of ontologies, the
data is stored and organized in a meaningful way. It helps for context based search unlike the
keyword based search, whereas the latter gives more irrelevant search results.
2. LITERATURE SURVEY
Raghu et. al [1] developed yellow pages service provider by using semantic web technologies and
improved the search results by increasing the relevancy through feedback mechanism for geo-
spatial and mobile applications. Richard Vlach et.al [2], developed a single schema to extract
information from multiple web sources and handled ambiguous text. Wood et. al. [3] extracted
the botanical data presented in the form of text and defined a model for correlating them using
ontologies. Rifat et. al [4], in his paper suggested the lazy strategy scheme for information
extraction along with usual machine learning techniques by building the specialized model for
each test instance. Jie Zou et. al [5] segmented HTML documents into logical zones for medical
journal articles using Hidden Markov Model approach. In their technical report [6], Rifat Ozcan
et. al used ontologies and latent semantic analysis technique to reduce the irrelevancy.
Ayaz et.al [7] discussed that the data from web sites can be converted to XML format for better
information analysis and evaluation. Harish et. al [8] developed an interactive semantic tool to
extract pertinent information from unstructured data and visualized it through spring graph using
NLP and semantic technologies. James Mayfield et.al [9] discussed that the information retrieval
could be tightly coupled with inference so that the semantic web search engines can lead to
improvements in retrieval. Mohammed et.al [10], in his paper developed a web based multimedia
enabled eLearning system for selecting courses to suit to students’ needs using the dynamic
mash-up technique. Uijal et.al [11] presented a Linked Data approach to discover resume
information enabling the task aggregation, sharing and reusing information among different
resume documents. Chris Welty et.al [12], in his research paper, transformed the data into
knowledge base and used deeper semantics of OWL to improve the precision of relation
extraction. Maceij Janik et.al [15] in their paper classified Wikipedia documents using ontology
and claimed that their model not required training set for classification, but can be done with the
help of ontologies. Canan Pembe et. al [18] proposed a novel approach for improving the web
search by representing the HTML documents hierarchically. They used semantic knowledge to
represent the section and subsection of HTML documents.

3. Computer Science & Information Technology (CS & IT) 195
3. METHODOLOGY
The general methodology adopted in this paper is diagrammatically represented in Fig. 1 and
explained in this section. Keywords are given to the search engines and the search results are
analyzed further for relevant information extraction. The layout of different HTML pages is learnt
and the pointer is moved to the section where the necessary data or information is present. We’ve
conducted various experiments for different HTML’s tags for retrieving the information, which in
detail is explained in Section 4. Relevancy of web pages is determined with the help of synsets
generated by the WordNet. Earlier, ontologies, or the vocabularies used for different domains are
generated using Protégé tool [15]. The user query is mapped with the updated repositories and
ontologies by ontology mapping module and then the fine tuned results are given back to the user.
This feedback mechanism introduced through ontology mapping increases the relevancy.
Fig. 1. Generic model for relevant Information Extraction from web documents
Sample ontology representation [19] used for Experiment 1 is shown in Fig 2 where the
relationship can be easily maintained for knowledge inference.
Fig. 2. Ontology representation of College staff members

4. 196 Computer Science & Information Technology (CS & IT)
4. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
We’ve conducted two different experiments with HTML pages to extract information and to
discover new knowledge from them. We’ve used RDF for storing the content and SPARQL and
Jena [18] for querying RDF content. Ontologies created using Protégé tool is used for context
based search. It establishes the relationship between the concepts and enables the increased
relevancy.
4.1 Experiment 1
The staff profile in various formats like .html, .pdf, .doc is fed to the structured data extraction
module after preprocessing and converted into RDF format. The model followed for this process
is shown in Fig. 3. For this experiment, we’ve taken our college web site (www.tce.edu) and
collected the profiles of all staff members of all the departments. We’ve ignored the HTML pages
in which the journal publication details may not present and have considered only the profiles
which have the journal publication details. The number of documents taken for the experiment is
shown in Table 1. We’ve used HTMLTidy parser to make the document syntactically clean
document. By this process, all unclosed tags are closed and unwanted lines are removed.
Fig. 3. Model for Information Extraction from HTML pages (list tags)
Once the pre-processing phase gets completed, the clean html pages are fed into structured data
extraction phase. This is accomplished by using the Wrapper Induction Technique [20], which is
the supervised learning approach, and is semi-automatic. In this approach, a set of extraction rules
is learned from a collection of manually labeled pages. The rules are then employed to extract
target data items from other similarly formatted pages.
For eg. the journal profile of a staff member after conversion may look like
<rdf:Description>
<staff:authors> A.M.Abirami </staff:authors>
<staff:title> An Enhanced ….. </staff:title>
<staff:journal>International Journal …. Technology </staff:journal>

5. Computer Science & Information Technology (CS & IT) 197
<staff:year>2012</staff:year>
</rdf:Description>
Similarly profile of all staff members are converted into RDF format. The words related for each
research area are stored in the RDF format. The exact domain in which each staff member is
doing research is identified with the help of these words and their titles in the publications. The
similarity between each staff member is measured with respect to their publications, thus the staff
with similar profile is easily identified. Cosine similarity measure is used for this purpose. Latent
semantic indexing can also be used as the alternate. These set of profiles can be recommended for
new persons who fall in the same category of research. Or the staff member can easily find
his/her research colleagues to strengthen their relationships between them. The model suggested
in this paper thus is helpful for categorizing the web documents. We’ve developed a tool to give
the visualization effect such that the tool gives report on the number of people working in the
particular research field, number of publication from each department in each journal and the like.
The Table 1 shows the new knowledge discovered from the set of profiles. Among the staff
members of the department, the persons working in the same research category are easily
discovered.
Table 1. Knowledge Discovered from staff member profile
4.2 Experiment 2
Now-a-days all the colleges use web applications to maintain the students’ personal and academic
details, but it may be maintained and managed by one department. Not all department members
are given access to the database and its tables. Sometimes it may become necessary to analyze the
students’ attendance and performance details, but we are left with data in the web pages. In this
case, it is better if these data are converted into suitable machine learnable format so that
inference and analysis can be easily made on the data. Otherwise, the human support is very
much required for this process.
Department
Total
Documents
Research
Category
Matched Documents
CSE 14
Distributed
Computing
CSE - 5, IT - 4, MCA- 1,
ECE – 3
IT 11 Data Mining CSE - 2, IT - 3, MCA – 2
MCA 7 Security CSE - 3, IT – 3
ECE 26
Software
Engineering
CSE - 2, IT - 1, MCA – 2
Image
Processing
CSE - 2, MCA - 1, ECE –
4

6. 198 Computer Science & Information Technology (CS & IT)
Fig. 4. Model for Information Extraction from HTML pages (Tables)
We’ve followed the model given above to extract the relevant and required information about
students from the different web pages as shown in Fig 4. We’ve used DOM APIs to extract the
content from HTML tables and converted into XML for querying. Ontology is used for building
the URL and the tool developed learns the set of information to be retrieved from the login id and
other databases. Ontologies are constructed for various concepts like student, staff member,
proctor, subjects and semester. The relationship between each concept is established using OWL
and the pictorial representation is shown in Fig. 5. We’ve extracted our students’ data from the
HTML pages into XML and RDF and used different XML query languages like XSLT, XPATH
and SPARQL and compared the time taken for the inference and shown in Table 2.
Fig. 5. Ontology representation for Experiment 2

7. Computer Science & Information Technology (CS & IT) 199
Table 2. Knowledge Acquisiton from different web pages
Here the student details like personal, attendance and test marks are displayed in different HTML
tables. For example, the attendance of a single class is displayed in a web page. In order to collate
details of a single student, we need to parse three or more web pages. But the information
extraction module traverses all these web pages and parses the content into required format like
XML or RDF and enables for easy query processing. Single XML file means that a group of
students details are stored in a file; multiple XML files means that each student detail is stored in
separate files.
5. CONCLUSION
We have developed different semantic web applications to convert the unstructured or semi-
structured text into XML/RDF format to enable easy machine processing. This approach leads to
quick inferences and new knowledge discovery from the set of data. As a future enhancement, we
will impart machine learning algorithms for classifying the web documents based on their
content.
REFERENCES
[1] Raghu Anantharangachar1 and Ramani Srinivasan .: Semantic Web techniques for yellow page
service providers. International Journal of Web & Semantic Technology (IJWesT) Vol.3, No.3, July
2012.
[2] Richard Vlach, Wassili Kazakaos .: Using Common Schemas for Information Extraction for
Heterogeneous Web Catalogs. ADBIS 2003, LNCS 2798, pp.118-132, 2003.
[3] M.M. Wood, S.J. Lydon, V. Tablan, D. Maynard, and H. Cunningham.: Populating a Database from
Parallel Texts Using Ontology-Based Information Extraction. LNCS 3136, pp. 254–264, 2004.
[4] Rifat Ozcan, Ismail Sengor Altingovde, and Ozgur Ulusoy .: In Praise of Laziness: A Lazy Strategy
for Web Information Extraction. ECIR 2012, LNCS 7224, pp. 565–568, 2012.
[5] Jie Zou, Daniel Le and George R. Thoma .: Structure and Content Analysis for HTML Medical
Articles: A Hidden Markov Model Approach. DocEng’07, ACM 978-1-59593-776.
[6] Rifat Ozcan, Y. Alp Aslandogan .: Concept Based Information Retrieval Using Ontolo-gies and
Latent Semantic Analysis. A Technical Report, CSE-2004-8.
[7] Ayaz Ahmed Ayaz Ahmed Shariff K, Mohammed Ali Hussain, Sambath Kumar .: Lev-eraging
Unstructured Data into Intelligent Information – Analysis & Evaluation. IPCSIT vol.4, 2011
International Conference on Information and Network Technology.
HTML
Records
Manual
Effort
(in mts)
Time taken (ms)
Single XML/RDF file
Time Taken (ms)
Multiple
XML/RDF files
XSLT XPath SPARQL XPath SPARQL
60 30 90 78 207 6458 890
140 80 350 218 220 25272 1190
200 130 540 360 230 97984 1388
500 280 985 795 240 213783 2398

8. 200 Computer Science & Information Technology (CS & IT)
[8] Harish Jadhao, Dr. Jagannath Aghav, Anil Vegiraju .: Semantic Tool for Analysing Un-structured
Data. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 3, Issue 8.
[9] James Mayfield, Tim Finin .: Information Retrieval on the Semantic Web: Integrating inference and
retrieval. SIGIR 2003 Semantic Web Workshop.
[10] Mohammed Al-Zoube, Baha Khasawneh .: A Data Mashup for Dynamic Composition of Adaptive
Courses. The International Arab Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 7, No. 2, April 2010.
[11] Ujjal Marjit, Kumar Sharma and Utpal Biswas .: Discovering resume information using linked data.
International Journal of Web & Semantic Technology (IJWesT) Vol.3, No.2, April 2012.
[12] Chris Welty, William Murdoc. J: Towards knowledge acquisition from Information Ex-traction.
ISWC'06 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on The Semantic Web, pages 709-722,
2006.
[13] Maciej Janik, Krys Kochut : Wikipedia in action: Ontological Knowledge in Text Cate-gorization.
University of Georgia. Technical Report No. UGA-CS-TR-07-001.
[14] Canan Pembe, Tunga Gungor: Heading based Sectional Hierarchy Identification for HTML
Documents. International Symposium on Conference in Computer and Informa-tion Sciences, ISCIS
2007.
[15] http://protege.stanford.edu/
[16] http://www.w3schools.com/rdf/rdf_example.asp
[17] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/
[18] http://jena.sourceforge.net/tutorial/RDF_API/
[19] http://www.obitko.com/tutorials/ontologies-semanticweb/ontologies.htm
[20] Bing Liu,"Web data mining - Exploring hyperlinks,contents,and usage data".
[21] Grigoris Antoniou and Frank van Harmelen, "A semantic Web Primer".