Issues With The Patriot Act

Issues With The Patriot Act
There are numerous issues with the US Patriot Act. It has forestalled numerous assaults on us from
terrorists; however would you truly need to surrender such a great amount of opportunity by
keeping in mind that the end goal has better control of terrorists. Numerous individuals would
bolster the demonstration since it does offer more assurance against those assaults. Other be that as
it may, would absolutely differ with the demonstration. The USA Patriot Act is really disregarding a
large portion of our Constitution rights. The demonstration will permit the government rights to
investigate your own life. In the event that the legislature has enough confirmation this
demonstration will give the chance to investigate your own things, for example,
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Declaration Of The Patriot Act
We use technology every day, all day, for pretty much everything we do. Any information about
ourselves, messages we send, or phone calls we make, it all takes place on our phones. However,
they are also the biggest risk to our personal security as they are very vulnerable. They are not just
vulnerable to scammers and hackers but also to our own government. Following the attacks of
September 11, 2001, the president at the time, George Bush, responded by passing an act. This act is
known as the Patriot Act. It allows the government unlimited access to phone records, emails, and
text messages without a warrant through National Security Letters and Sneak and Peak Searches.
Why do they do this, why was this act passed, they claim it's for our safety. Both can be obtained
and carried out without a judge's approval, without a warrant, and without the knowledge of the
person who is being searched. The Fourth Amendment is the right of the citizens to legal and just
searches, with a warrant, with probable cause. These are not required under the Patriot Act to search
through call histories and messages. The Patriot Act clearly infringes on the Fourth Amendment and
the rights of the everyday citizen and does not accomplish its original goal of stopping terrorism.
The great American patriot Robert F. Kennedy once said in his famous "Day of Affirmation
Address" that the first and most critical element of "individual liberty is the freedom of speech; the
right to express and communicate

The US Patriot Act
Introduction Americans have always held the rights and liberties close to their hearts. Ever since we
became an independent nation. After the tragic events that happened on September 11th, 2001,
Citizens of America began to ponder if some of their rights and liberties should be sacrificed to
prevent such an attack in the future. National unity took over the country and Americans bonded and
held each other up. They stood up in the face of terrorism and the Presidents approval rating soared
through the roof (from 54% to nearly a whooping 86% which is the highest level it has ever been).
Sadly, the American public rallied behind the Government and provided support for an Act that will
come to violate their freedoms that they cherish so much. Congress drafted the US Patriot Act in
only 45 days (which leads some to believe that it was already pre–made and was just a combination
of a "wish–list" that the FBI had and was waiting for the right time to implement). Still filled with a
sense of national pride and deeply scarred by the terrorist attacks which occurred on September
11th, 2001, americans accepted the Act to blatantly avoid being labeled unpatriotic in the eyes of
their peers and government. Still, in the face of being labeled "unpatriotic", many thousands of open
minded individuals who saw what this Act could in the future openly question the Government
though their cries where heard by mute ears. When the House sent the US Patriot Act to the Senate
for approval in 2001,

Compare the movie "The Patriot" with Historical Reality?
Movies are made to be sold and not history to be perfectly told. If movies include a complete
history, it wouldn't be known as a movie anymore. However, it would be called a documentary,
which most people get fed up of. So interpretations, exaggerations and idealistic scenes are added to
the movie to make it more interesting for the audience. "The Patriot" is a similar film made during
the modern day time about a time period in which none of the experienced the real revolution.
Politically, socially, and culturally, "The Patriot" attempts to give a sense of the scope of aspects
involved in the American Revolution. Despite succeeding in this regard, it still lacks details that
reveal the true complexity of the mixed sentiments present in ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
They were also very organized in battle as shown in the movie, and that's why they didn't know how
to deal with militia men. However, the brutality wasn't as much as shown in some parts of the
movie. It is done to show the evilness of the British and so when the patriots killed any British, it
seemed that they are taking revenge and so the brutal actions of the patriots were acceptable. In one
scene, the British regulars order the execution of a colonial soldier captured in uniform. In fact, such
war crimes by regular troops rarely happened. In the most incongruous scene, the people of the
entire town are locked in a church which is then set on fire. It is very hard to believe that any British
soldier would actually burn a church, because mostly everyone at that particular time was either
Puritanical or Catholic. To desecrate such a sacred ground would be tantamount to sin; something
that a British general would never order, nor would his soldiers follow, even if the order was given.
As historian Thomas Fleming puts it: 'Of course it never happened. If it had, do you think
Americans would have forgotten it? It could have kept us out of World War I' (Online). The events
that people were exposed to in the film, were extremely violent, not to mention, only one side of the
story is given.
The colonists on the other hand were no more humane than the British, even though in the movie it
tries to show that they were working on becoming more humane. This assumption comes

The Patriot Act Essay
After 911 attacks on the World Trade Center, Congress passed a new law: "The Patriot Act" which
has accomplished exactly what it was designed to do," Bush said. "It has helped detect terror cells,
disrupt terrorist plots and save American lives." The five main provisions that took place in 2006
while Bush was President are: (1) telephone taps, internet taps and voice mails – which allow the
government to tap these devises – with a court order. All telephones used by the individual/suspect
may be tapped without a separate order from the court for each devise in question. The government
is also able to seize voice mail/messages that are in question as being evidence. This is something to
keep in mind: At least 25 police departments own a Stingray, a ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
If deportation and/or if the individual is not charged for the crime in question, then they will remain
in detainment if they are deemed a risk to security. (4) The government now has the power to track
money that they suspect as being "laundered money" across one border to another or from bank–to–
bank. In 2013, The Treasury Department took action in arresting The Liberty Reserve, as a money
laundering organization, using powers under the Patriot Act to effectively cut the company off from
the U.S. financial system. The executives faced charges for laundering $6 Billion dollars in cyber
money. (5) The Patriot Act provisions – allow for an increase in penalty for any/all terrorist crime
with the statue of limitations eliminated. The key to the Patriot Act is empowering the government
to do the right things – while exercising oversight to prevent any abuse of authority. As long as
lawmakers keep a vigilant eye on police authority, the federal courts remains open, and the debate
about governmental conduct is a vibrant part of the American dialogue, the risk of excessive
encroachment on our fundamental liberties is

Patriot Act Essay
Patriot Act The 9/11 terrorist attacks caused a great panic in the United States. They threatened the
safety of everyone as a nation. On September 11th, 2001 19 men associated with the Islamic
extremist group named al–Qaeda, hijacked four airplanes and they carried out suicide attacks
against the United States. Two of the airplanes were flown into both towers of the World Trade
Center in New York City, the third airplane hit the Pentagon just outside of Washington, D.C., and
the fourth airplane crashed in a field in Pennsylvania. More than 3,000 innocent people lost their
lives that day (Soma). The Patriot Act is a U.S. law passed because of the September 11, 2001
terrorist attacks. The goals of the Patriot Act are to strengthen national security and broaden the
powers of law–enforcement agencies with regards to identifying and stopping terrorists (Justice).
The passing and renewal of the Patriot Act has been extremely controversial. Supporters claim that
it's been helpful in several investigations and arrests of terrorists, while others argue the act gives
the government too much power, threatens civil liberties and weakens the very democracy it seeks
to protect (Smith). I believe the patriot act is an invasion of privacy and it belittles our fourth
amendment. Title one of the patriot act authorizes federal money to accomplish much of the act's
necessities and authorizes the Secret Service to create a nationwide electronic crime task force. This
section also gives the

Is The Patriot Movie Historically Accurate
The movie "The Patriot" starring Mel Gibson was an excellent film that was produced in 2000. In
the movie " The Patriot" it portrayed the life of Patriots fighting for freedom , the life of their
families, and the colonies. But many say that this movie is not historically accurate at all. Benjamin
Martin isn't a real person, The battle didn't end in South Carolina it ended in Saratoga New Jersey. "
The Patriot" has its moments of being historically inaccurate and accurate. On my honest opinion
"The Patriot" is historically accurate and in these 4 paragraphs I'll tell you why.
First,with Benjamin Martin. tTo first start the guy isn't real he some made up man that the director
Ronald Emmerich fools you to believe this man help us become the big 50 states. Well you might be
thinking well this movie is supposed to help us learn about history not make it up, well you are
correct but Benjamin Martin symbolizes many of the people who does help build the big 50 states .
To be exact Benjamin Martin exactly could represent Andrew Pickens according to The Patriot Film
Fact Or Fiction : People Andrew Pickens was a militia soldier with a large family and a strict
Presbyterian. Just like Benjamin Martin was. Or Benjamin Martin could symbolize Thomas Sumter
who was known for how he was a an extreme hot head and stubborn just like Benjamin Martin at
the beginning ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Battle Of Cowpens battle of cowpens in the movie was the final battle of the Revolutionary
War, also were the surrender took place. In history The Battle of Cowpens was the 5th Battle in the
Revolutionary War. Also according to "The Patriot Film Fact Or Fiction: Battles " Continental
regulars and Colonel Burwell were waiting in reserve behind the rise, rather than retreating". This
quote proves that the Patriot is his historically inaccurate on the Battle Of Cowpens. Also in the
movie Benjamin Martin killed Colonel Tavington and in history he didn't die by that

How Is The Patriot Historically Accurate
The Patriot Movie is a good movie that is an emotional that explains how the American
Revolutionary War and how things were done. The Patriot is a 2000 American historical fiction war
film directed by Roland Emmerich, written by Robert Rodat, and starring Mel Gibson, Chris Cooper
and Heath Ledger. The film takes place during the real–life events of the Southern theater of the
American Revolutionary War. In the summer of 1781, after six years of war, the American Army
was struggling. The British occupied New York City.The movie The Patriot is somewhat historically
accurate. In The Patriot Movie Benjamin Martin a veteran of the French and Indian War and
widower with seven children is called to Charleston to vote in the South Carolina General. In the
movie Benjamin does what he can to avoid fighting in the Revolutionary War. When his oldest son
Gabriel joins the Patriots and his second born son Thomas is killed, he takes it upon himself to join
and fight with the colonial militia. He is nicknamed "The Ghost" by the British. In the movie Mel
Gibson plays Benjamin in the movie The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
During the movie he is mostly fighting the Patriots, he is a loyalist. In the movie he calls the Patriot
militia "farmers with pitchforks" in front of Colonel Tavington. In the movie General Cornwallis
killed Benjamin son. Also in the movie he thinks that the loyalist where not correctly trained and is
worthless of defeating them. He is a very skilled officer in the British army. In history General
Cornwallis was not as arrogant as shown in the movie. Also in history General Cornwallis was
fighting with is men not alone, Cornwallis's fortified position on the night of October 14. Also in
history General Cornwallis did not attend the surrender ceremony saying that he was not feeling
well. This is somewhat alike because in the movie and in history he was an General and fought with
the british and was loyal to his

The Patriot Act And The Patriot Act
The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required toIntercept and
Obstruct Terrorism Act, more commonly known as the USA PATRIOT Act, or simply the Patriot Act
was signed into law on October 26, 2001, 45 days after the terrorist attackson September 11
th
. At the signing of the Patriot Act in 2001, President George W. Bush said thatthe act would provide
"important new tools to fight a present danger" (Gerdes). Since then, thePatriot Act and the
"important new tools" it authorizes have been subjects of intense controversy.The debate over what
the Patriot Act actually allows law enforcement officials to do, however,centers on the balance of
national security and protection of civil liberties in legislation.In the United States, civil liberties are
the rights individuals have that are free frominterference from the government or others; they
include the rights listed in the Bill of Rights aswell as those protected by state or local laws (Boaz).
Also, the Ninth Article of The Bill of Rightsstates that "the enumeration...of certain rights, shall not
be construed to deny or disparage othersretained by the people", so rights concerning privacy and
"others retained by the people" can beincluded under the label of civil liberties. In the past, civil
liberties have been challenged andsuspended in times of war. The Patriot Act contains provisions
that bring up the issue of civilliberties during wartime. Critics call the Patriot Act "unwarranted and

The Patriot Act.
On September 11, 2001 Muslim terrorists instilled with a hatred of the west attacked the United
States in a brutal fashion. Planes were hijacked and flown into the World Trade Center in New York.
Over three thousand people were killed and the impregnable nation known as America was know
scared and vulnerable. Almost immediately the legislature began drafting an act that would make
the war on terror and the fight for homeland security a little easier to fight, this would come to be
known as the Patriot Act
"PATRIOT" is an acronym for "Uniting and Strengthening America by providing Appropriate Tools
Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism. The Patriot Act allows the government and law
enforcement agencies to have ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This is especially true for groups of people in the United States. Immigrants, especially of Arab
origin and those with Islam as their religion are seen as terrorists. This is blatant racism and
discrimination which is also completely against what this country stands for.
Also concerned is the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). This is an organization that is
dedicated to raising awareness of civil liberties. The PATRIOT Act, as the name suggests is
supposed to protect the citizens of the country from attacks across its borders. It defeats its own
purpose in attacking from within the very people it's supposed to protect. In fact, it does almost the
opposite by provoking a fear and paranoia that tends to remind us of such wonderful events like the
Spanish inquisition or the Salem Witch Trials.
The ACLU talks about several groups that are unfairly targeted by the Act to the extent that the
constitution is being violated. I have already talked about Arab and Muslims but even neighbors are
supposed to report anything that "appears" suspicious. Turning people against each other is not only
a reminder of the above mentioned historical events but it also leads to fear in a place where none is
needed.
The Act gives law enforcement the right to search any building or residence that might prove
suspect. It seems that such suspicion is easy to provoke making it likely that an innocent law abiding
citizen will find himself

The Patriot Act And The Patriot Act
Michael Barrios
Dr. Barrett
U.S. Government
October 4, 2017
Patriot Act
Public Law 107–56 otherwise known as the USA PATRIOT Act was signed into law by President
George W. Bush on October 26, 2001. USA PATRIOT Act is an acronym which stands for Uniting
and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct
Terrorism Act. (justice.gov) This law was instated in response to the terrorist attacks on September
11, 2001. The Islamic terrorist group known as Al–Qaeda, coordinated four different plane
hijackings killing 2,996 people, and injuring 6,000+ others. (9/11 memorial.org) Just weeks after the
attacks congress rushed to pass this bill, passing the senate 98 to 1, and the house 357 to 66
(justice.gov), so that we can have more security controls within the United States. It gives the
United States government the same powers and tools used to investigate organized crime and drug
trafficking in decades prior, to investigate current suspected terrorist. The Patriot act has several
different titles that cover different grounds, all which have the same purpose of preventing future
acts of terrorism. The patriot act allows the government to track and intercept any form of electronic
communications of suspected terrorist in order to prevent any acts of terror, and also for intelligence
gathering. The act also aids the government in securing borders, and removing those that are here
with the intent to cause harm.
Senator Tom Cotton is a

The Importance Of The Patriots
The reigning Patriots, maintaining the title undefeated for ten games in a row, were striped of the
honor by the Broncos on Sunday, November 29. The final ended with the Broncos breaking the tie
in overtime with a touchdown, winning by a score 30–24. On average, the Patriots have defeated
these opponents by 14 points. This one loss, however, strikes to be more significant to the players
and fans than the winnings themselves. At first, the Patriots started strong in the first quarter as
Wide Receiver Ron Gronkowski made a 23–yard touchdown. However, this action led the Broncos
to strengthen their defense only to be met with more losses as the safety and defensive lineman were
carted off with injuries. In the second quarter, Patriots

September 11, 2001 was one of the worst days in U.S. history. Many Muslim men hijacked planes
and crashed them into the world trade center buildings, and the pentagon killing almost 3,000
innocent people. After this incident, every Muslim was seen as a terrorist so the U.S government
enacted the patriot act, which gave more power to the federal law–enforcement and intelligence
gathering in suspected terrorist crimes. The patriot act gives the government power to do whatever
they want for "national security" and take away the civilians civil rights. The government can tap
into cell phones and listen in on conversations or even watch what people are searching on the
internet. Since the passing of the patriot act racial profiling has grown in the past years especially
towards Muslims. The patriot act may have seemed like a good idea at the time but in reality it just
gives the government a way to strip citizens of their rights, is unconstitutional, and it needs to be
removed. Once the patriot act was enacted racial and ethnic profiling spiked. Now Muslim men are
65% more likely to be stopped for "random searches" at transportation hubs such as airports.
According to Ibrahim Hooper, "American Muslims have already lost many their civil rights and All
Muslims are considered suspects" (Bork). The biggest sign of this is supposedly ethnic profiling that
is now occurring all over the country but mostly in airports but other places as well. "This form of
discrimination is felt to be

My opinion may be different than yours but here it is . Overall in the movie , scenes / events did
occur that similarly happened in history and on the other hand other events were not historically
accurate. If you didn't know already the movie the Patriot is based on a character Benjamin Martin
who is an unassuming man who is forced to join the American revolutionary war after his son
Thomas is killed. Benjamin was tasked with keeping the Lord Cornwallis's regiments pinned south
through guerilla warfare. But back to my key point in this essay I will be explaining why I
personally have an overview that the movie accurately depicts events that happened in history. The
movie accurately depicts the events in history because the battle of cowpens, ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Those people were Elijah Clarke, Andrew pickens , Thomas Sumter, Daniel Morgan , Nathanael
Greene and Francis Marion. In the movie Benjamin is a veteran of the french and indian war and a
widowed father of seven children. Benjamin avoids fighting in the revolutionary war , but then
resides after something devastating happens. Benjamin leads the americans to a successful victory in
the end of the movie against the British. However, in history the depiction of the characters he is
based off is actually accurate but some things arent. For instance in the movie Benjamin's house was
burned by the army of british and he is a militia commander / fighter in south carolina . This relates
to history because the " patriot source" "states one of the characters benjamin is based off is named
Andrew Pickens. Andrew Pickens house was also burned down by tories which lead him to join the
patriot effect", which is similar to what happened to Benjamin and also Pickens is also known for
his large family and prehysteria background . The Patriot Source also states that unlike Martin ,
Pickens was not widowed at the start of the

Patriot Movie Vs History
Movies are a brilliant way to immerse yourself into a wonderful story, full of well–developed,
interesting (well, there have been some exceptions) characters. People in the film industry work
hard to come up with a plot line that can draw in many viewers. There are not only movies that are
created as a work of fantasy, but also ones that are inspired by real events that has transpired. Many
have been based on historical events that we learned in history class. Yes, a movie might be able to
teach you a thing or two about the past. What better way to learn history, right? Unfortunately, the
ones making the film don't always portray the most accurate of content relating to history. It is a
movie; not a documentary. The Patriot is one of those ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Battle of Camden was shown briefly; it was being observed from an abandoned house by
Benjamin and Gabriel when they left to join the war. Benjamin criticised on how Gates led his
troops. It was on August 16 when this battle took place. General Horatio Gates lost to Cornwallis's
army in the movie and in history. The final battle of the film was based on the Battle of Cowpens
and the Battle of Guilford Courthouse. The Battle of Guilford Courthouse has less similarities to the
end battle of the movie than the Battle of Cowpens. On January 16, 1781, Daniel Morgan took
charge of the militia at the Battle of Cowpens. Instead of Morgan in this battle, we have Benjamin
Martin taking the spotlight. Morgan knew that militia might try to retreat, so he made it to where
they cannot run. Behind him and the men was the Broad River, which cut off an escape route. This
made it so the militia would have to choose to fight or die. The battle in the movie did not show any
kind of river around the area. "Morgan put his rawest militiamen in the front line, backing them up
with seasoned men from Virginia and his veteran Continental troops" (Phillips). Even the British
pointed out in The Patriot how the militia was front and center of the troops. What the British didn't
know was that Morgan also had many more troops behind them. Each line of troops was spread
about 150 yards away from each other and had a larger number of troops who were more trained the
further it went back. Martin had a similar setup going on in the film. Martin and Morgan had the
ones on the frontlines to open fire at the last minute aiming for the officers. They would have to fire
two shots, then run back to the next line of troops. The British, in turn, would chase after them.
Then the next line would do the same thing and go to the back of the main line to form up together.
Tarleton's

Pros To Patriots Essay
Controversial end leads to Patriots win over Steelers, Refs gift Patriots game with this mind–
boggling non catch, Questionable call takes lead away from Bills vs. Patriots, Controversial call vs.
Jets leads to Patriots victory. These are just some of the controversial calls that favored the New
England Patriots and ended up leading to a victory. If you are not a New England Patriots fan in this
era, i'm sorry. The National Football League (NFL) has shown their love for the team along with all
the referees and fans. Makes sense because of the market that the team gives the league. Tom Brady
being the greatest quarterback of all–time and shattering records that athletes left behind after a
career. Yet, Tom Brady, also known as the G.O.A.T, seems to be still in his prime after fifteen years
in the league. After all, the Patriots color combination is red, white, and blue thus the reason why
they are referred to as the new "America's team". The New England Patriots ... Show more content
If you are not a Patriot fan, this may or bother you because of the political viewpoint of the National
Football League. It seems to other fans that the League does not want them to lose. Why would they
when the Patriots have arguably the best quarterback to have ever played in the league on their
active roster. The Patriots bring entertainment to the league. After Tom Brady retires, which will
probably be within the next five years, the entertainment will move to the team with another MVP
type callober superstar. If you are a fan, you can sit back and just watch that entertainment that Tom
Brady and Rob Gronkowski bring you. Along with not needing to worry about if the team is down
by a few points because either; the other team blows a lead (Atlanta Falcons) or the referees got
your

The Usa Patriot Act
In the mist of America ending its wars in both Iraq and Afghanistan here in the homeland we are
still be proactive in trying to alleviate terrorist threats and opportunities for terroristic activity in our
backyards. When looking at the USA PATRIOT ACT that was enacted to help battle this ongoing
pandemic it has come into question whether the laws of the USA PATRIOT ACT extremely broad,
narrow, and overarching that they leave too much room for interpretation which in the end has led to
violations of a person's rights that they are guaranteed by the US Constitution.
Since the passage of the USA PATRIOT ACT in 2001 by then President George W. Bush and the
renewal of it in 2011 by President Barrack Obama, there has been much debate over ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
The two provisions that were struck down revolved around the 4th Amendment of unreasonable
search and seizures in regard to intelligence gathering. This ruling stems from a case where the
federal government arrested an attorney in the United States in connection with his alleged
involvement with the 2004 Madrid train bombings. The lawsuit stated that the FBI illegally and
secretly broke into both his home and office to gather evidence and were being protected under
provisions of the US Patriot Act.
Looking at an article titled How the Patriot Act Violates Virtually the Entire Bill of Rights written
by Hamilton, S in 2011. Hamilton takes a hard look at the Bill of Rights from the U.S. Constitution
as a whole and begins to bring parts of the US Patriot Act the violate the given amendment. Most of
the first ten amendments have at least one article or portion of the Patriot Act that clearly violates
the unalienable rights that American citizens were afforded at the time the U.S. Constitution was
initially signed. S.N. Herman in his article The US PATRIOT ACT and the Submajoritarian Fourth
Amendment that was published in the Harvard Civil Rights–Civil Liberties Law Review in 2006
deals completely around violations of the US Patriot Act in regards to the Fourth Amendment of the
U.S. Constitution. It brings forth the facts that support that we as American citizens have allowed
the government to chip away at our rights to be free from unreasonable searches and

The Declaration Of The Patriot Act
When we approach people in any country around the globe and ask questions as to who are
terrorists and the word terrorism which brought to the Unite States the birth of Patriot Act as well as
the controversy surrounding the Act as a whole, we will see that the patriot act went too far because
certain provisions seem to violate the constitutional rights of the citizens of this country.
First, I see terrorism as war and a terrorist in my view is a soldier going to war for certain purpose
and reason to destroy. If captured, they should be treated as prisoners of war. What comes to the
mind of terrorists is always war such as in military actions because they believe they have a cause to
fight for. They are not countries declaring war ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In his writing, he stated that war is intrinsically vast, communal (or political) and violent. It is an
actual, widespread and deliberate armed conflict between political communities, motivated by a
sharp disagreement over governance" (p.135)
Without terrorist, there will be no patriot act. Terrorists commit aggression; they have their own
armed forces. They have the capability of sending their soldiers to violate other citizen's rights by
kidnapping, causing atrocities and harm to innocent people. This is why they deserve to be punished
and made to suffer any consequences for their actions. They commit aggressions and only conduct
business by violence, especially against innocent civilians and creating fear to all nations. Thus, the
immediate federal response to the World Trade Center attack by some terrorist group was the
creation of the Patriot Act which contains the following contents with some to strengthen domestic
security and ethical issues. According to the U.S Department of justice.gov. "It stated that the
creations of the act, pertains to the country's protection of civil liberties, which authorizes federal
money to accomplish much of the act 's provisions, it allows the Secret Service to create a
nationwide electronic crime task force. The president can confiscate the

The Patriot ( 2000 )
The Patriot (2000) follows Benjamin Martin (Francis Marion) a widower with 7 children and
veteran of the French and Indian war. He is reluctant to join the fight against the British until
Colonel William Tavington (Lt. Colonel Banastre Tarleton) kills Benjamin's son and burns down his
house in South Carolina. Benjamin Martin leads his militia and attacks against the British with
guerilla warfare until the climax battle, where he takes revenge for his son and kills Colonel
William. What is wrong with The Patriot? It may have gotten the big picture, which was that the
British taxed the colonists unfairly and the colonists took action by forming a militia to win the war
through guerilla warfare, but that's one of the few things that are historically accurate about the film.
Important things that are historically accurate are the ambushes that Benjamin Gates took part in.
Attacking head to head was not an option because the British soldiers were obviously more
powerful so the militia used surprise attacks and ambushes to beat the British. Also the character
Colonel William Tavington, who was based off of the British soldier Lt. Colonel Banastre Tarleton,
was probably the most hated officer in the British army. His tactics were cowardly and evil because
he would shoot the enemy after they surrendered. The film did a great job at showing how menacing
Lt. Colonel Banastre Tarleton really was. Nevertheless, the film was mostly inaccurate and could be
considered an American version

Have you ever seen "The Patriot"? If you have do you know the truth behind it because some parts
really happened and some parts didn't. Meaning that "The Patriot" is somewhat historically accurate.
The Patriot is somewhat historically accurate because the main character Benjamin Martin was not a
real person he was based on Francis Marion, the Battle of Cowpens was exactly the same because
the colonist had extra help to fight off the British, and the surrender of Colonel Cornwallis was
somewhat alike because his army could not get around the French and the colonist in history and in
the movie. So "The Patriot" has many differences and similarities to history. First, according to the
Patriot Source Benjamin Martin was not even a real person. Martin was based off of Francis
Marion. In the movie Francis was depicted as someone who took care of his kids and made sure
they were safe and when troops were hurt and they landed on his plantation he took care of them
and bandage them up. In the movie Martin goes into the army after his two older sons to make ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In history according to Dakota Voice "American General Daniel Morgan had a line of militia fire
into British General Cornwallis' and Colonel Tarleton's dragoons, regulars, Highlanders and
loyalists. When the Americans retreated, the British pursued, only to be surprised by American
Continentals waiting over the hill. In the confusion, the Americans killed 110 British and captured
830." In the movie when they fight the Patriots shoot first and knock out some of the British. Then a
couple shots later the colonist run away from the British. The colonist lay down with their guns
pointed while American Continentals shoot at the British and set off bombs. Then everyone starts
fighting anyone that's left and Martin kills Colonel William Tavington especially because he killed
his sons and daughter–in–law. Hence the Battle of Cowpens is the same in history and in the

The Patriot Act : The Consequences Of The Patriot Act
Forty–five days after the September 11 terrorist attacks on the United States, Congress passed the
USA PATRIOT Act, also known as the "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing
Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism" Act, or more simply, the Patriot
Act. The Patriot Act was created with the noble intention of finding and prosecuting international
terrorists operating on American soil; however, the unfortunate consequences of the Act have been
drastic. Many of the Patriot Act's provisions are in clear violation of the U.S. Constitution–a
document drafted by wise men like Benjamin Franklin, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and
George Washington in order to protect American rights and freedoms. The Patriot Act encroaches on
sacred First Amendment rights, which protect free speech and expression, and Fourth Amendment
rights, which protect citizens against "unwarranted search and seizure" (Justice). The Patriot Act
authorizes unethical and unconstitutional surveillance of American citizens with a negligible
improvement in national security. Free speech, free thinking, and a free American lifestyle can not
survive in the climate of distrust and constant fear created by the Patriot Act. The great American
patriot Robert F. Kennedy once said in his famous "Day of Affirmation Address" that the first and
most critical element of "individual liberty is the freedom of speech; the right to express and
communicate ideas, to set oneself apart from the dumb

Patriot Essay
Martin, a veteran of the French and Indian War, thinks of himself as a battle–weary peacenik (his
eldest son joins the army against his wishes), but if he believes in liberating the colonies from the
tyranny of King George III, he believes even more fervently in smiting the holy bejesus out of the
soldiers who have torn his family apart. That these aristocratic oppressors happen to be the same
redcoats who are fighting to quash the American Revolution is, shall we say, a matter of the highest
moral convenience.
Written by Robert Rodat (''Saving Private Ryan'') and directed by the heavy–tromping blockbuster
maestro Roland Emmerich (''Independence Day,'' ''Godzilla''), ''The Patriot'' is set in fields, forests,
homes, and backwaters, and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
At first, the opposing armies, in their red and blue uniforms, line up in stately rows, absurdly
organized, like marching bands with muskets. As the guns crack and the soldiers fall, the battles
become a stately ritual of mass suicide. The revolutionary forces are the underdogs, ragged and
barely equipped. It's Martin who has the idea of uniting a militia to stage pinpoint ambushes in the
woods. Attacking by stealth, he becomes a fearsome legend, a ghost of a fighter. In one juicy scene,
he sneaks out of hiding for an impromptu negotiation with Lord General Cornwallis (Tom
Wilkinson), who leads the British troops in the South. Cornwallis is actually an honorable fellow,
and that's his problem. He approaches armed conflict like a gentleman; he believes in war as a
civilized assertion of Empire. What he can't wrap his mind around, because it has barely existed
before, is the notion of a soldier who fights as an individual, without rules.
As long as it stays on the battlefield, ''The Patriot'' is a brutishly compelling broad–canvas
entertainment. But the movie is also inflated with clichés from the screenwriter's manual. There's the
motley crew of loutish ''colorful'' proles who join Martin's militia, the squeaky–clean romance
between Martin's soldier son (Heath Ledger) and a local lass (Lisa Brenner), the vacuously noble
slave–turned–soldier (Jay Arlen Jones) who counts down the months before he's freed from
servitude, and, of

Patriot Act Benefits
Supporting the Patriot Act will continue to be a great stepping stone towards terrorism as well as
other issues that have inflected the U.S. The Patriot Act was establish after the terrorist attack of
9/11 to ensure the security of U.S citizens. I have gather enough information to state that it will be a
beneficial decision to support the Patriot Act. First of all, the increase in security, has made it harder
for terrorist to plan and carry out attacks. This means that the implemented factors allowed by the
Patriot Act, have been working. Since the drastic event of 9/11, "[A]t least 30 planned terrorist
attacks have been foiled, [and] all, but two of them [where] prevented by law enforcement.", as
stated by the Heritage Foundation. If it

The Patriot Accuracy
Is The Patriot accurate or not? This is a controversial question. I think the movie is partially correct
because some events did happen and some were made up. Even some of the characters were made
up in this movie. This movie is somewhat accurate because some events were real and some were
made up, some characters were not real and some where real, and some of the settings are not true
and is true. This is exactly why "The Patriot" is somewhat accurate. First, this movie is somewhat
accurate because some events were real and some were made up. Like , the battle of cowpen did not
happen like that in the Revolutionary War, this is probably why the director left this battle unnamed.
Another example is when the redcoats locked the screaming women,

The Patriot Movie Historical Accuracy
The Patriot The movie, The Patriot, was released in the year 2000. It is a drama/action film that
relates to the American Revolutionary War. Although the plot of the movie is fictional there are
many aspects that relate to what happened in the war, but some have discrepancies. The Patriot is
the story of a South Carolina plantation owner, Benjamin Martin, who is played by Mel Gibson. It is
more a story of a family during the war then the war itself. When all of the men from Charleston
gathered to the town meeting to discuss whether they should join the war effort and separate with
England or not, Martin speaks of taxation without representation, which in fact was a major factor in
the war. To me, this proves that the movie tried to be as factual to history as possible. Originally,
Martin ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They had already lost their mother; he was all they had left. When William Tavington, a ruthless
British Colonel, kills one of his sons and takes another prisoner, he is left with no choice but to fight
for the colonies freedom. Benjamin Martin's character is supposedly based on Francis Marion, who
was a heartless murderer. Martin uses guerilla warfare to stop the British from getting supplies and
attack outposts in order to slow General Charles Cornwallis from joining the British troops in the
North. Although the purpose of the movie is to entertain the audience, it can also be viewed as
history. It does follow historical events from the beginning of the Revolutionary War. However,
many details have been altered to create drama and action for the viewer's entertainment. One scene
in the movie that was created solely for the purpose of entertainment is when the British grouped
many colonists and locked them inside of a church that they then set on fire, burning them all alive.
This never occurred in history because something of such matter would have been printed in every
history

The Importance Of The Patriot Act
After the attack on September 11, 2001, the United States implemented the Patriot Act. This new act
was signed by President George W. Bush on October 26, 2001, and brought about many changes to
make the United States strong by making changes that would help guard against terrorism.
The Patriot Act was implemented right after the September 11 occurrence. This act revised the
electronic surveillance which allows the administration to eavesdrop on anyone. Although Patriot
Act was rejected before the September 11 incidence, the legislative body overturned their decision
by the Bush Administration. Although some members of the committee did not have a chance to
review the Patriot Act, but it was voted in successfully and signed by President Bush. Before the
Patriot Act went into effect, surveillance was limited by the authorities (Surveillance Under the
USA/Patriot Act, 2017). As stated by Hall (2015), "The USA Patriot Act amended existing
surveillance statutes. When the Fourth Amendment and these statutes are viewed as a whole,
electronic and wire surveillance can be divided into four categories, each with a different level of
privacy protection" (p. 487). Previously, authorization was limited to only designate offences to
listen to discussions on the telephone; furthermore, there never a distinctive understanding if a
warrant or summons was mandatory in listen to voice messages. Even when any warrant was
granted, it had state the name of the transporter of the communication's

Essay On Patriot Act
Are you truly your brother's keeper? Are you responsible for the actions of fellow man?
The United States government believes so, laws passed like the Patriot Act are used to give
government officials the permission to listen and watch EVERYONE close. Some would say their
invading people's right to privacy and abusing their power, but are these actions put in place to truly
protect the people from those who choose to destroy and sabotage the United States of America
from the inside. Their mindset behind their actions what's right for one, must be right for all. The
USA PATRIOT Act is an Act of Congress that was signed into law by President George W. Bush on
October 26, 2001. With its ten–letter backronym (USA PATRIOT) expanded, the full ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
"In 2009 alone, U.S. authorities foiled at least six terrorist plots against the United States. Since
September 11, 2001, at least 30 planned terrorist attacks have been foiled, all but two of them
prevented by law enforcement. The two notable exceptions are the passengers and flight attendants
who subdued the "shoe bomber" in 2001 and the "underwear bomber" on Christmas Day in 2009.
Bottom line: The system has generally worked well. But many tools necessary for ferreting out
conspiracies and catching terrorists are under attack. Chief among them are key provisions of the
PATRIOT Act that are set to expire at the end of this year. It is time for President Obama to
demonstrate his commitment to keeping the country safe. Heritage Foundation national security
experts provide a road map for a successful counterterrorism strategy."(McNeil, 2010). The above is
an expert that explains that 30 attacks on the United States were foiled due the Patriot Act. Another
example of this act being an advantage of the U.S.
"America needs the Patriot Act because it helps prevent terrorism while posing little risk to civil
liberties. The law simply lets counterterrorism agents use tools that police officers have used for
decades. And it contains elaborate safeguards against

Patriot Act
Often our nation sees as a symbol of freedom to the world; however, since the events of 9/11 the
U.S congress signed into law the U.S Patriot Act. This legislation extends the power of the
government by strengthening its oversight authority over the nation, claiming war on terrorism and
protection of national security against any potential threats. As an American citizen, I agree with
some of the terms and measures adopted under the Patriot Act in which the government needs to
intercept, obstruct, and monitor terrorism actions keeping us safe from potential attacks. However,
the acts fails to secure American liberties, rather it facilitates and encourages the government to be
authoritative on the pretext of the idea of national security, assuming ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Undoubtedly and clearly the Patriot Act reaches the First Amendment, which is a constitutionally
protected right and a maximum definition of our patriotism. As a result it is reflected in what we can
say, express or thought making us carefully limit the use and meaning of our words, because free
speech terms can be associated against federal law aimed to combat terrorism organizations,
accusing the protesters to participate in civil disobedience, even though the First Amendment is a
non–violent form of expression opposing a totalitarian regime and characteristics of a state
monopoly. The Patriot Act protects and shields the government with absolute authority and power to
intimidate or coerce the way how law–abiding American citizens express, or participating in a
peaceful and legal protest activities, even when all requirements are fallow and permits in public
places such as streets, sidewalks, or any public area. Traditional public forums (protest) should not
be an excuse for the government to

Patriot Act Essays
Patriot Act
"We're dealing with terrorists who operate by highly sophisticated methods and technologies, some
of which were not even available when our existing laws were written. The bill before me accounts
for the new realities and dangers posed by modern terrorists. It will help law enforcement to
identify, dismantle, disrupt, and punish terrorists before they strike," (President George W. Bush at
signing of Patriot Act, 2001). The terrorists of today cannot be reasoned with. We must do whatever
necessary to ensure that there never will be another September 11th. Since the enactment of the
Patriot Act, there have not been any major acts of terrorism committed on U.S. soil. If the Act had
been established earlier, perhaps the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
By establishing these bills, we will save this nation from another September 11th. If we fail to act
upon our threats, we will be no different from other oppressed nations. Chief Justice Robert Jackson
says, "The Constitution is not a suicide pact. Failing to take strong measures to defend our nation
against future attacks would amount to suicide. The U.S.A. Patriot Act is an important part of the
nation's efforts to fight back to defend freedom and liberty."
The ACLU has also influenced Congress to limit the sharing of information obtained through wire–
tapping. The Act has removed major barriers between communications of law enforcement,
intelligence and national defense communities from talking and coordinating their work, to
protecting the American people and national security. Senator John Edwards (D–NC) said about the
Patriot Act, "We cannot prevail in the battle against terrorism if the right hand of our government
has no idea what the left hand is doing." One example of the progress of this law was when a federal
grand jury just recently had indicted an individual in Florida, Sami al–Arian, for allegedly being the
U.S. leader of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, one of the world's most violent terrorist outfits.
Palestinian Islamic Jihad is responsible for the murder of over 100 innocent people including a
young American, Alisa Flatow, who was killed in a tragic bus bombing incident in the Gaza

Argumentative Essay On Patriots
Numerous former employees say the Patriots would have someone rummage through the visiting
team hotel for playbooks or scouting reports. The whole league knows the Patriots are cheaters and
they cover their tracks after they leave Boston. The deflategate was no accident; it was a purposeful
act. The Patriots claim innocence in the incident. The Patriots are not victims because other teams
claim Patriots have cheated against them, Former Patriot employees claim they were asked to cheat
for the team, and Patriots claims about weather conditions are false. The Colts were not the first
team to fall victim to the Patriots cheating habits. Heath Miller, a Pittsburgh Steelers player, claims,
"They were calling our stuff out. They knew, especially that first championship game here at Heinz
Field. They knew a lot of our calls. There's no question some of their players were calling out some
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The employees who were recently apart of the Patriots organization say the coach would order an
employee to go look for visiting teams playbooks in their hotel rooms or film the team's signals
(Weitzman). The whole league is aware that the New England Patriots are cheaters so the teams that
visit Boston make sure to cover their tracks after they leave by not leaving any important
information in the trash cans or in their rooms. Teams also started to find their own space to practice
the days leading up to their game with the Patriots due to the Spygate incident in 2007 with the New
York Jets. "NFL commissioner Roger Goodell has determined that the New England Patriots
violated league rules Sunday when they videotaped defensive signals by the New York Jets'
coaches" The NFL caught some Patriots employees breaking several rules at one of the Jets
practices in one of the Patriots

Patriot Act Essay
The "Patriot Act"
In the wake of the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, Congress sprang into action. Within a
month, U.S. lawmakers overwhelmingly approved the USA Patriot Act of 2001, giving law
enforcement and intelligence agent's broader authority to fight terrorists operating in the United
States.
Signed into law by the President on October 26, the Patriot Act is designed to fight terrorism on
several fronts. First, it gives the U.S. government authority to hold foreigners suspected of terrorist
activity for up to seven days before charging them with a crime. The legislation also gives
investigators the legal right to tap any phone a suspected terrorist might use. ... Show more content
the titles of books an individual has purchased or borrowed or the identity of individuals who have
purchased or borrowed certain books. The Patriot Act authorizes the use of devices to trace the
telephone calls or e–mails of people who are not suspected of any crime. American citizens and
permanent legal residents' investigated and sought information on the basis of activities protected by
the First Amendment.
The Patriot Act allows investigators to use the tools that were already available to investigate
organized crime and drug trafficking. Many of the tools the Act provides to law enforcement to fight
terrorism have been used for decades to fight organized crime and drug dealers, and have been
reviewed and approved by the courts.
This Act allows law enforcement to use surveillance against more crimes of terror. Before the
Patriot Act, courts could permit law enforcement to conduct electronic surveillance to investigate
many ordinary, non–terrorism crimes, such as drug crimes, mail fraud, and passport fraud. Agents
also could obtain wiretaps to investigate some, but not all, of the crimes that terrorists often commit.
The Act enabled investigators to gather information when looking into the full range of terrorism–
related crimes, including: chemical–weapons offenses, the use of weapons of mass destruction,
killing Americans abroad, and terrorism

The Patriot Movie Historically Accurate Analysis
The Realism of "The Patriot"
I think that the movie "The Patriot" was somewhat historically accurate. I think that it was
somewhat historically accurate because of Benjamin Martin, Colonel Tavington, and the Battle of
Cowpens. Also because some things that were demonstrated in the movie; are true facts. Some
things that happened in the movie are not, some things are fabricated by the producers of the movie.
So the movie cannot be completely historically inaccurate, and the movie cannot be completely
historically accurate. So I think that "The Patriot" was somewhat historically accurate.
The first reason that I think that "The Patriot" was somewhat historically accurate is because of the
man named Benjamin Martin. Benjamin Martin is based on a man named Francis Marion.
According to 'patriotresource.com' they are very much alike in terms of war and Being chased by ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
William Tavington is based on a man named Banastre Tarleton. Also according to
'patriotresource.com', Hollywood is correct about the fact that Tarleton/Tavington being tories. They
are also correct about Tarleton/Tavington being sent by Cornwallis to fetch Martin/Marion, and not
accomplishing the task. Hollywood was wrong about some things though. According to "The
Patriot" Tavington had a bad relationship with Cornwallis, but history says that Tarleton considered
Cornwallis his mentor. Hollywood also says that Tavington/Tarleton was killed in battle and had a
face–to–face encounter with Martin and his sons. This cannot be historically correct because : 1.
Marion had no kids until after war. 2. Tarleton never actually had a face–to–face encounter with
Marion and his "Son". And 3. Tarleton was not killed in battle. I believe the director added this for a
happy ending. So the character of Tarleton was not captured

Write An Essay On Patriots
The Super Bowl is the biggest game of the year. This year's game will be an amazing one. The
Eagles will face the Patriots in a rematch of the Super Bowl 13 years ago. The Patriots are the
favorite of most, but the Eagles, after a breakout season, are going to give the defending champs all
they can handle. Here's why: Is there really much to say about the Patriots offense? They are the
leaders in offensive yards and the second highest scoring offense of the year (ESPN). They are led
by the transcendent quarterback Tom Brady and exemplary offensive mind Bill Belichick. On the
other side, the Eagles are led by Nick Foles and Doug Pederson. The Eagles are third in passing
yards, fourth in rushing yards, and fourth in points in the postseason (ESPN). ... Show more content
Despite the Cinderella Eagles offense, the Patriots are by far the better offense. On the other side of
the ball, the Eagles' defense is their real strength. They are fourth in sacks, second in interceptions,
and third in fumble recoveries (ESPN). But these stats do not tell the whole story. The Eagles have
the ability to bottle up their opponents with their stifling defense. The Pats comparatively have had
their fair share of struggles on the defensive end, but have managed to pick up the play. They are
second in tackles, first in sacks, and fourth in forced fumbles (ESPN). The Patriots have a great
front line, but the weakness of this defense is in their secondary. The Patriots have a solid defense,
but the Eagles all around have the best defense in this game. So far, the teams have been shown to
be very evenly matched. The Pats offense matching up with the Eagles defense will balance out
their advantages. This game might come down to the play of their special teams. The Eagles have a
solid unit as

The Importance Of The Patriot Act
Your viewpoint towards The Patriot Act was noteworthy. This writer holds a contrary opinion
towards yours. On a smaller scale, would you oversee the safety and well being of a sibling, a
family member, a neighbor? Even if it meant, checking up on them from time to time. The Patriot
Act may seem invasive, but at the end of the day could save hundreds of innocent lives, including
yourself and your family. On a larger scale, the government has the responsibility to protect its
people from foreign and domestic terrorism. For example, roving wire taps, a constituent of the
Patriot Act, lead to apprehension of Najibullah Zazi, a conspirator and aid to Al–Qaeda. In
September 2009, Najibullah was convicted for planning to use weapons of mass

Essay on The Patriot
The Patriot, written by Robert Rodat, takes place in South Carolina and reveals a widowed father's
love for his family and trying to keep them together, despite the Revolutionary War that had begun.
Trying to keep his demons from reappearing, Benjamin Martin faces his fear of his past coming
back to haunt him after serving in the French and Indian War. Martin is a South Carolina farmer
who lost his wife, Elizabeth, and reluctantly signs up to join the Continental Army after his eldest
son, Gabriel joined the regulars to fight against the British. After a battle began on Martin's
plantation, Benjamin helped wounded soldiers from both sides and was approached by William
Tavington, a colonel with the British. During this confrontation ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He stood up to his own father and those who believed that the British should be killed not fought,
and fought to the end for the cause of freedom. Between Gabriel's dedication to the cause and
Benjamin Martin's military experience, the dedication of the men fighting, the cause of freedom was
fought on all fronts. However, during the fights, many men were lost, including another of Benjamin
Martin's sons, Gabriel. After Gabriel's death, Martin's fears were solidified and vowed not to fight
for anyone's causes. However, he realized that being a true patriot was the only way to honor his
son's deaths, so he fought for the cause of freedom and was truly victorious in his fights.
While The Patriot was a very successful major motion picture, characters from the movie actually
mirror those of characters that were indeed real. Colonel Tavington's character is based on the life of
Lt. Col. Banastre Tarleton the subordinate of Lt. General Charles Earl Cornwallis of the British
Army. Benjamin Martin's character was based on Francis Marion (which is also now a famous hotel
in historic downtown Charleston), also known as "Swamp Fox" fought Indians. In the movie Martin
and his men destroyed the Indians, however in the reality Marion and just a few of his men
survived.
Not only were there differences in the characters in the movie and those of the real

Usa Patriot Act
After the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, a controversial piece of legislation
was adopted and passed called the U.S.A. Patriot Act. The title for this bill is an acronym for "the
United and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and
Obstruct Terrorism Act" (USA Patriot Act).
In the years since the passing of the Patriot Act, there has been much controversy and debate
regarding the positive and negative advantages, and consequences of this bill. As a member of the
law enforcement community I have experienced firsthand some of the changes the Patriot Act has
brought upon this nation. A result of this experience along with information obtained in the studying
of this act and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Constitution. Along with this expansion of surveillance powers is the "sneak and peek provision"
(The USA–PATRIOT Act and the American response to terror; panel discussion, 2002). During a
discussion panel in 2002, David E. Suchar discussed this provision stating the "sneak and peek
provision, which allows the government to conduct secret searches of anyone, including citizens,
without notifying the person that they have a search warrant and that the search is authorized".
Suchar further stated this provision is "a very broad standard that probably could be met in a
tremendous number of cases and not limited to fighting terrorism in any way, shape, or form" (The
USA–PATRIOT Act and the American response to terror; panel discussion, 2002, para. 18). From a
civil liberties perspective, the surveillance expansion provisions within the Patriot Act are troubling
when considering the possibility of abuse, and the trouncing of fourth amendment rights. Another
troubling consequence of the Patriot Act and the expansion of surveillance powers is the use of
profiling. In order to efficiently gather intelligence information for the safety of this country, it
would be common sense to develop a target of sorts to better focus the efforts made. Many believe
that Muslims in this country have become the unfortunate targets of profiling. The monitoring of
those with family and business ties to countries rooted with terrorism is a logical direction for

The Patriot Act
After the terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001 our country underwent a change that has
drastically affected the fundamental values that our founding fathers instilled in this country. Since
that tragic day in September the aftermath of the attacks has started to implicate our Civil Liberties
that in this country we hold so dear. Just 45 days after the September 11 attacks, with virtually no
debate, Congress passed the USA Patriot Act on October 5th, 2001. This act expanded the
surveillance powers of domestic law enforcement and international intelligence agencies. The
controversy that must be discussed is whether or not this legislation fully or in part has violated the
Constitution and/or endangered our civil ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Malkin?s support of the Act is based on the fact that it revised outdated rules that fatally hampered
surveillance of suspected terrorists in America, helped craft plans to monitor the entry and exit of
foreign students and implemented a federal program to register and track non–immigrant visitors
from high–risk Middle Eastern countries. With its new granted power the federal government has
busted more than 20 suspected al Qaeda, convicted 100 other individuals for terror–related crimes
and since the September 11 attacks, has prevented a further mass terrorist attack on our homeland.
Malkin praises Viet D. Dinh, saying ?to civil liberties alarmists, Viet Dinh is a traitor. To me, he is
an American Hero.? Her argument that the Act is no threat to civil liberties is supported by Viet
Dinh and his supportive thesis. Malkin states ?opponents of the Bush Administration?s homeland
defense and immigration enforcement efforts complain that the war on terror has eviscerated civil
liberties and constitutional rights, and they have likened John Ashcroft, Dinh and the Justice
Department to the Taliban and the Nazis.? Malkin uses Viet Dinh?s response to the alarmists to
defend her position. Dinh states ?The threat to liberty comes from Osama bin Laden and his al
Qaeda terrorist network, not from the men and women in blue who work to uphold the law.? He
justifies his position through Edmund Burke?s theory of ?Ordered Liberty.? The theory of Ordered

Analysis: The Secret To The Patriots
"The Secret to the Patriots' success, DEFENSE?"
The New England Patriots have been thriving during this 2016 season without their star quarterback
Tom Brady, who has been suspended for the first four games of the season for "deflating footballs"
in a 'scandal' called Deflategate. The Patriots have had to rely on back–up QB Jimmy Garropolo,
who has filled in his role admirably and led the Patriots to a 2–0 record. However, Garropolo
suffered an AC joint sprain in his throwing shoulder during Week 2's game against the Miami
Dolphins, and third–stringer Jacoby Brissett became the Patriots' new starting QB. In Week 3,
Brissett carried the Patriots to a commanding 27–0 victory over the Houston Texans. Garropolo and
Brissett are both the results of a system of finding potential and developing it, yet they were both
helped by a consistent defense that has held the opponent and kept the Patriots in a game. Belichick
not only focused on the development of his inexperienced QB and the plays of his offense, but also
worked hard with a defense ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Ever since Belichick and Tom Brady have been working together starting in 2001, the Patriots have
had 14 consecutive winning seasons, 22 postseason victories, 6 Super Bowl appearances, and 4
Super Bowl wins. It is now harder than ever to stay atop of the NFL, with many star players opting
for pricier contracts from other teams, yet the Patriots have found a way to consistently beat other
teams for more than a decade. Furthermore, the Patriots have found ways to win despite major
injuries from Tom Brady, maybe the greatest quarterback of all

Historical Accuracy Of Benjamin Martin In The Movie, The...
Breaking news!Benjamin Martin is fake, I repeat, Benjamin Martin is fake! You might be
wondering, who is Benjamin Martin? Well to start off, he is the main character in the movie, the
Patriot. The patriot was a movie released in 2000 that is a parody of the Revolutionary War. The
patriot is somewhat historically accurate because it portrays militia–fighters, it has some hollywood
differences, and it portrays what life was like back then. In the movie, Benjamin Martin is forced to
become a Patriot when the British threaten to take his farm away. They actually burnt his house
down. But according to http://www.patriotresource.com/thepatriot/factfiction/battles/cowpens.html ,
historically Benjamin Martin represents a lot ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
But, if Benjamin Martin is fake, who historically really made this brilliant plan? According to
http://www.patriotresource.com/thepatriot/factfiction/battles/cowpens.html , It was Daniel Morgan's
idea at the Battle of Cowpens to use the militia as a decoy. Benjamin Martins plan for this battle was
a parody of Daniel Morgan's plan for the Battle of Cowpens.So,in conclusion Benjamin Martin's
brilliant plan was in fact an imitation of Daniel Morgan's plan. Lastly, in the movie, Colonel
William Tavington is based on Lt. Colonel Banastre Tarleton. In the movie, Tavington is the a
British officer. According to
http://www.patriotresource.com/thepatriot/factfiction/people/tavington.html, he is the leader of a
group called the Green Dragoons because their uniform was predominantly green with red trim,
rather than the recognizable red uniform with the addition of green trim as in the movie. Also, in the
movie Tavington died in the last battle, but in history,he died at the siege of Charleston. In
conclusion, Colonel William Tavington is an imitation of Lt. Colonel Banastre

Issues With The Patriot Act

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Cola Gigli

More from Cola Gigli (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Issues With The Patriot Act