SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Download to read offline
© 2014 The American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or
transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of
ARTBA.
Highlights from FHWA’s 2013 National Bridge Inventory Data:
 Of the 11,022 bridges in the state, 1,298 bridges, or 12% are classified as structurally deficient.
This means one or more of the key bridge elements, such as the deck, superstructure or
substructure, is considered to be in “poor” or worse condition.1
 There are 1,720 bridges, or 16% of all state bridges, classified as functionally obsolete. This
means the bridge does not meet design standards that are in line with current practice.
 Federal-aid investment in Michigan has supported $2.3 billion in bridge construction spending
on 5,322 bridges between 2003 and 2012, according to FHWA data.2
 Since 2004, 916 new bridges have been constructed in the state and 664 bridges have
undergone major reconstruction.
 The state estimates that it would cost approximately $6.2 billion to fix a total of 2,076 bridges in
the state.3
Bridge Inventory:
All Bridges Structurally deficient Bridges
Type of Bridge Total
Number
Area (sq.
meters)
Daily
Crossings
Total
Number
Area (sq.
meters)
Daily
Crossings
Rural Bridges
Interstate 390 356,598 7,078,144 14 9,687 341,557
Other principal arterial 613 375,071 5,193,168 25 9,802 190,755
Minor arterial 620 286,705 3,287,188 55 25,772 278,912
Major collector 2,074 664,351 4,441,228 306 68,376 583,555
Minor collector 537 128,125 498,658 70 11,601 50,448
Local 3,116 531,129 1,545,410 524 53,569 161,180
Urban Bridges
Interstate 826 1,396,818 29,877,980 54 190,154 1,932,654
Other freeway 315 332,302 7,954,389 16 17,370 256,736
Principal arterial 680 844,678 15,004,474 45 50,124 799,731
Minor arterial 809 747,099 9,880,261 94 64,919 1,133,645
Collector 470 298,362 3,687,442 40 21,354 215,314
Local 572 313,075 2,999,596 55 19,769 195,505
Not classified 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 11,022 6,274,311 91,447,938 1,298 542,496 6,139,992
1
According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a bridge is classified as structurally deficient if the condition rating for the deck,
superstructure, substructure or culvert and retaining walls is rated 4 or below or if the bridge receives an appraisal rating of 2 or less for
structural condition or waterway adequacy. During inspections, the condition of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed
condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition and the individual element displays signs of advanced section
loss, deterioration, spalling or scour.
2
ARTBA analysis of FHWA data, includes all bridge construction related spending on projects approved by FHWA between 2003 and 2012.
3
This data is provided by bridge owners as part of the FHWA data and is required for any bridge eligible for the Highway Bridge Replacement
and Rehabilitation Program. However, for some states this amount is very low and likely not an accurate reflection of current costs.
State Bridge Profile
Michigan
© 2014 The American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or
transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of
ARTBA.
Proposed bridge work:
Type of Work Number Cost (millions) Daily Crossings Area (sq. meters)
Bridge replacement 795 $4,383.8 2,072,555 156,017
Widening & rehabilitation 78 $35.9 1,296,269 44,497
Rehabilitation 178 $722.1 774,033 75,355
Deck rehabilitation/replacement 830 $949.9 10,456,793 837,554
Other work 195 $91.2 431,674 82,194
Top 10 Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in the State
County Year
Built
Daily
Crossings
Type of Bridge Location
(route/water under the bridge, traffic on the bridge and location)
Wayne 1954 146,000 Urban minor
arterial
I-94, SECOND BLVD, IN DETROIT
Wayne 1953 119,000 Urban Interstate OPEN AREA, I-94 TO W GR BLV R, IN DETROIT
Wayne 1967 100,492 Urban Interstate ROUGE R DEARBORN ST & RR, I-75, IN DETROIT
Genesee 1971 95,314 Urban Interstate M-54 (DORT HWY), I-69, IN FLINT
Macomb 1994 87,420 Urban other
principal arterial
M-53, M-59 WB, M-59 WB OV M-53
Genesee 1954 66,912 Urban Interstate SWARTZ CREEK, I-75, N OF I-69 @ INTERCHG
Oakland 1964 65,985 Urban Interstate M-150 (ROCHESTER RD.), I-75 SB, IN TROY
Wayne 1962 65,737 Urban Interstate ECORSE RD, I-94 WB, IN TAYLOR OVER ECORSE RD
Jackson 1949 64,800 Urban Interstate CONRAIL & GRAND RIVER, I-94, 0.4 MI W OF M-106
Genesee 1971 59,000 Urban Interstate ATHERTON RD, I-475, IN FLINT
Sources: All data is from the 2013 National Bridge Inventory, released by the Federal Highway Administration in March 2014.
Note that specific conditions on bridge may have changed as a result of recent work. Cost estimates of bridge work provided as
part of the data and have been adjusted to 2013$ for inflation and estimated project costs. Contract awards data is for state
and local government awards and comes from McGraw Hill. Note that additional bridge investment may be a part of other
contract awards if a smaller bridge project is included with a highway project, and that would not be accounted for in the total
in this profile.

More Related Content

What's hot

State Bridge Profile Wisconsin 2014
State Bridge Profile Wisconsin 2014State Bridge Profile Wisconsin 2014
State Bridge Profile Wisconsin 2014artba
 
Oregon State Bridge Profile
Oregon State Bridge ProfileOregon State Bridge Profile
Oregon State Bridge Profileartba
 
Montana State Bridge Profile
Montana State Bridge ProfileMontana State Bridge Profile
Montana State Bridge Profileartba
 
State Bridge Profile North Dakota 2014
State Bridge Profile North Dakota 2014State Bridge Profile North Dakota 2014
State Bridge Profile North Dakota 2014artba
 
North Carolina State Bridge Profile
North Carolina State Bridge ProfileNorth Carolina State Bridge Profile
North Carolina State Bridge Profileartba
 
State Bridge Profile Iowa 2014
State Bridge Profile Iowa 2014State Bridge Profile Iowa 2014
State Bridge Profile Iowa 2014artba
 
State Bridge Profile Arkansas 2014
State Bridge Profile Arkansas 2014State Bridge Profile Arkansas 2014
State Bridge Profile Arkansas 2014artba
 
State Bridge Profile New Mexico 2014
State Bridge Profile New Mexico 2014State Bridge Profile New Mexico 2014
State Bridge Profile New Mexico 2014artba
 
Washington State Bridge Profile
Washington State Bridge ProfileWashington State Bridge Profile
Washington State Bridge Profileartba
 
State Bridge Profile Kansas 2014
State Bridge Profile Kansas 2014State Bridge Profile Kansas 2014
State Bridge Profile Kansas 2014artba
 
Alaska State Bridge Profile
Alaska State Bridge ProfileAlaska State Bridge Profile
Alaska State Bridge Profileartba
 
Idaho State Bridge Profile
Idaho State Bridge ProfileIdaho State Bridge Profile
Idaho State Bridge Profileartba
 
South Dakota State Bridge Profile
South Dakota State Bridge ProfileSouth Dakota State Bridge Profile
South Dakota State Bridge Profileartba
 
State Bridge Profile Ohio 2014
State Bridge Profile Ohio 2014State Bridge Profile Ohio 2014
State Bridge Profile Ohio 2014artba
 
State Bridge Profile West Virginia 2014
State Bridge Profile West Virginia 2014State Bridge Profile West Virginia 2014
State Bridge Profile West Virginia 2014artba
 
State Bridge Profile Kentucky 2014
State Bridge Profile Kentucky 2014State Bridge Profile Kentucky 2014
State Bridge Profile Kentucky 2014artba
 
State Bridge Profile Washington 2014
State Bridge Profile Washington 2014State Bridge Profile Washington 2014
State Bridge Profile Washington 2014artba
 
New Hampshire State Bridge Profile
New Hampshire State Bridge ProfileNew Hampshire State Bridge Profile
New Hampshire State Bridge Profileartba
 
State Bridge Profile Vermont 2014
State Bridge Profile Vermont 2014State Bridge Profile Vermont 2014
State Bridge Profile Vermont 2014artba
 
State Bridge Profile Maine 2014
State Bridge Profile Maine 2014State Bridge Profile Maine 2014
State Bridge Profile Maine 2014artba
 

What's hot (20)

State Bridge Profile Wisconsin 2014
State Bridge Profile Wisconsin 2014State Bridge Profile Wisconsin 2014
State Bridge Profile Wisconsin 2014
 
Oregon State Bridge Profile
Oregon State Bridge ProfileOregon State Bridge Profile
Oregon State Bridge Profile
 
Montana State Bridge Profile
Montana State Bridge ProfileMontana State Bridge Profile
Montana State Bridge Profile
 
State Bridge Profile North Dakota 2014
State Bridge Profile North Dakota 2014State Bridge Profile North Dakota 2014
State Bridge Profile North Dakota 2014
 
North Carolina State Bridge Profile
North Carolina State Bridge ProfileNorth Carolina State Bridge Profile
North Carolina State Bridge Profile
 
State Bridge Profile Iowa 2014
State Bridge Profile Iowa 2014State Bridge Profile Iowa 2014
State Bridge Profile Iowa 2014
 
State Bridge Profile Arkansas 2014
State Bridge Profile Arkansas 2014State Bridge Profile Arkansas 2014
State Bridge Profile Arkansas 2014
 
State Bridge Profile New Mexico 2014
State Bridge Profile New Mexico 2014State Bridge Profile New Mexico 2014
State Bridge Profile New Mexico 2014
 
Washington State Bridge Profile
Washington State Bridge ProfileWashington State Bridge Profile
Washington State Bridge Profile
 
State Bridge Profile Kansas 2014
State Bridge Profile Kansas 2014State Bridge Profile Kansas 2014
State Bridge Profile Kansas 2014
 
Alaska State Bridge Profile
Alaska State Bridge ProfileAlaska State Bridge Profile
Alaska State Bridge Profile
 
Idaho State Bridge Profile
Idaho State Bridge ProfileIdaho State Bridge Profile
Idaho State Bridge Profile
 
South Dakota State Bridge Profile
South Dakota State Bridge ProfileSouth Dakota State Bridge Profile
South Dakota State Bridge Profile
 
State Bridge Profile Ohio 2014
State Bridge Profile Ohio 2014State Bridge Profile Ohio 2014
State Bridge Profile Ohio 2014
 
State Bridge Profile West Virginia 2014
State Bridge Profile West Virginia 2014State Bridge Profile West Virginia 2014
State Bridge Profile West Virginia 2014
 
State Bridge Profile Kentucky 2014
State Bridge Profile Kentucky 2014State Bridge Profile Kentucky 2014
State Bridge Profile Kentucky 2014
 
State Bridge Profile Washington 2014
State Bridge Profile Washington 2014State Bridge Profile Washington 2014
State Bridge Profile Washington 2014
 
New Hampshire State Bridge Profile
New Hampshire State Bridge ProfileNew Hampshire State Bridge Profile
New Hampshire State Bridge Profile
 
State Bridge Profile Vermont 2014
State Bridge Profile Vermont 2014State Bridge Profile Vermont 2014
State Bridge Profile Vermont 2014
 
State Bridge Profile Maine 2014
State Bridge Profile Maine 2014State Bridge Profile Maine 2014
State Bridge Profile Maine 2014
 

Viewers also liked

Ida al pasado.Marcos, Carlos y José Luis.
Ida al pasado.Marcos, Carlos y José Luis.Ida al pasado.Marcos, Carlos y José Luis.
Ida al pasado.Marcos, Carlos y José Luis.Josefina Navarro Vega
 
Esquema de la clasificación de los animales
Esquema de la clasificación de los animales Esquema de la clasificación de los animales
Esquema de la clasificación de los animales Jacquegarg
 
Analisis de plan accion 3
Analisis de plan accion 3Analisis de plan accion 3
Analisis de plan accion 3majufer
 
Roma ika e
Roma ika eRoma ika e
Roma ika eeapdim
 
Braidot demaría -sor juana, alfonsina storni-
Braidot   demaría -sor juana, alfonsina storni-Braidot   demaría -sor juana, alfonsina storni-
Braidot demaría -sor juana, alfonsina storni-magalibraidot
 
Entrevista
EntrevistaEntrevista
Entrevistadanigg91
 
Gestión Integral de Recursos Humanos
Gestión Integral de Recursos HumanosGestión Integral de Recursos Humanos
Gestión Integral de Recursos Humanosmmava
 
Cuento para lenguaje.
Cuento para lenguaje.Cuento para lenguaje.
Cuento para lenguaje.marchegc
 
Educacion en la universidad
Educacion en la universidadEducacion en la universidad
Educacion en la universidadVictor Alonso
 
Af interior semaforo ok
Af interior semaforo okAf interior semaforo ok
Af interior semaforo okmarpepri
 
POR QUE ES INCORRECTO HABLAR DE NUEVAS TECNOLOGÍAS DE LA COMUNICACIÓN
POR QUE ES INCORRECTO HABLAR DE NUEVAS TECNOLOGÍAS DE LA COMUNICACIÓNPOR QUE ES INCORRECTO HABLAR DE NUEVAS TECNOLOGÍAS DE LA COMUNICACIÓN
POR QUE ES INCORRECTO HABLAR DE NUEVAS TECNOLOGÍAS DE LA COMUNICACIÓNdixon david diaz hernandez
 
Mi guardería
Mi guarderíaMi guardería
Mi guarderíaganivama
 
18.埃及(詳細篇).第五天.阿布辛貝神廟.是湖中撈起的
18.埃及(詳細篇).第五天.阿布辛貝神廟.是湖中撈起的18.埃及(詳細篇).第五天.阿布辛貝神廟.是湖中撈起的
18.埃及(詳細篇).第五天.阿布辛貝神廟.是湖中撈起的溫秀嬌
 
καταρρακτεσ του νιαγαρα
καταρρακτεσ του νιαγαρακαταρρακτεσ του νιαγαρα
καταρρακτεσ του νιαγαραioannakor
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Ida al pasado.Marcos, Carlos y José Luis.
Ida al pasado.Marcos, Carlos y José Luis.Ida al pasado.Marcos, Carlos y José Luis.
Ida al pasado.Marcos, Carlos y José Luis.
 
Ecuador. Asley
Ecuador. AsleyEcuador. Asley
Ecuador. Asley
 
Aumente su autoestima
Aumente su autoestimaAumente su autoestima
Aumente su autoestima
 
Esquema de la clasificación de los animales
Esquema de la clasificación de los animales Esquema de la clasificación de los animales
Esquema de la clasificación de los animales
 
Analisis de plan accion 3
Analisis de plan accion 3Analisis de plan accion 3
Analisis de plan accion 3
 
Roma ika e
Roma ika eRoma ika e
Roma ika e
 
Braidot demaría -sor juana, alfonsina storni-
Braidot   demaría -sor juana, alfonsina storni-Braidot   demaría -sor juana, alfonsina storni-
Braidot demaría -sor juana, alfonsina storni-
 
Entrevista
EntrevistaEntrevista
Entrevista
 
Resumen legislación
Resumen legislaciónResumen legislación
Resumen legislación
 
Gestión Integral de Recursos Humanos
Gestión Integral de Recursos HumanosGestión Integral de Recursos Humanos
Gestión Integral de Recursos Humanos
 
Cuento para lenguaje.
Cuento para lenguaje.Cuento para lenguaje.
Cuento para lenguaje.
 
Educacion en la universidad
Educacion en la universidadEducacion en la universidad
Educacion en la universidad
 
Af interior semaforo ok
Af interior semaforo okAf interior semaforo ok
Af interior semaforo ok
 
POR QUE ES INCORRECTO HABLAR DE NUEVAS TECNOLOGÍAS DE LA COMUNICACIÓN
POR QUE ES INCORRECTO HABLAR DE NUEVAS TECNOLOGÍAS DE LA COMUNICACIÓNPOR QUE ES INCORRECTO HABLAR DE NUEVAS TECNOLOGÍAS DE LA COMUNICACIÓN
POR QUE ES INCORRECTO HABLAR DE NUEVAS TECNOLOGÍAS DE LA COMUNICACIÓN
 
Mi guardería
Mi guarderíaMi guardería
Mi guardería
 
Power point chocolate
Power point   chocolatePower point   chocolate
Power point chocolate
 
18.埃及(詳細篇).第五天.阿布辛貝神廟.是湖中撈起的
18.埃及(詳細篇).第五天.阿布辛貝神廟.是湖中撈起的18.埃及(詳細篇).第五天.阿布辛貝神廟.是湖中撈起的
18.埃及(詳細篇).第五天.阿布辛貝神廟.是湖中撈起的
 
News Julio2009
News Julio2009News Julio2009
News Julio2009
 
καταρρακτεσ του νιαγαρα
καταρρακτεσ του νιαγαρακαταρρακτεσ του νιαγαρα
καταρρακτεσ του νιαγαρα
 
Comidas
ComidasComidas
Comidas
 

Similar to Michigan State Bridge Profile

Colorado State Bridge Profile
Colorado State Bridge ProfileColorado State Bridge Profile
Colorado State Bridge Profileartba
 
Louisiana State Bridge Profile
Louisiana State Bridge ProfileLouisiana State Bridge Profile
Louisiana State Bridge Profileartba
 
State Bridge Profile Michigan 2014
State Bridge Profile Michigan 2014State Bridge Profile Michigan 2014
State Bridge Profile Michigan 2014artba
 
Hawaii State Bridge Profile
Hawaii State Bridge ProfileHawaii State Bridge Profile
Hawaii State Bridge Profileartba
 
State Bridge Profile Illinois 2014
State Bridge Profile Illinois 2014State Bridge Profile Illinois 2014
State Bridge Profile Illinois 2014artba
 
State Bridge Profile Indiana 2014
State Bridge Profile Indiana 2014State Bridge Profile Indiana 2014
State Bridge Profile Indiana 2014artba
 
Delaware State Bridge Profile
Delaware State Bridge ProfileDelaware State Bridge Profile
Delaware State Bridge Profileartba
 
State Bridge Profile Rhode Island 2014
State Bridge Profile Rhode Island 2014State Bridge Profile Rhode Island 2014
State Bridge Profile Rhode Island 2014artba
 
State Bridge Profile Louisiana 2014
State Bridge Profile Louisiana 2014State Bridge Profile Louisiana 2014
State Bridge Profile Louisiana 2014artba
 
California State Bridge Profile
California State Bridge ProfileCalifornia State Bridge Profile
California State Bridge Profileartba
 
State Bridge Profiles Alaska 2014
State Bridge Profiles Alaska 2014 State Bridge Profiles Alaska 2014
State Bridge Profiles Alaska 2014 artba
 
State Bridge Profile Utah 2014
State Bridge Profile Utah 2014State Bridge Profile Utah 2014
State Bridge Profile Utah 2014artba
 
State Bridge Profile Texas 2014
State Bridge Profile Texas 2014State Bridge Profile Texas 2014
State Bridge Profile Texas 2014artba
 
State Bridge Profile Hawaii 2014
State Bridge Profile Hawaii 2014State Bridge Profile Hawaii 2014
State Bridge Profile Hawaii 2014artba
 
State Bridge Profile Nebraska 2014
State Bridge Profile Nebraska 2014State Bridge Profile Nebraska 2014
State Bridge Profile Nebraska 2014artba
 

Similar to Michigan State Bridge Profile (15)

Colorado State Bridge Profile
Colorado State Bridge ProfileColorado State Bridge Profile
Colorado State Bridge Profile
 
Louisiana State Bridge Profile
Louisiana State Bridge ProfileLouisiana State Bridge Profile
Louisiana State Bridge Profile
 
State Bridge Profile Michigan 2014
State Bridge Profile Michigan 2014State Bridge Profile Michigan 2014
State Bridge Profile Michigan 2014
 
Hawaii State Bridge Profile
Hawaii State Bridge ProfileHawaii State Bridge Profile
Hawaii State Bridge Profile
 
State Bridge Profile Illinois 2014
State Bridge Profile Illinois 2014State Bridge Profile Illinois 2014
State Bridge Profile Illinois 2014
 
State Bridge Profile Indiana 2014
State Bridge Profile Indiana 2014State Bridge Profile Indiana 2014
State Bridge Profile Indiana 2014
 
Delaware State Bridge Profile
Delaware State Bridge ProfileDelaware State Bridge Profile
Delaware State Bridge Profile
 
State Bridge Profile Rhode Island 2014
State Bridge Profile Rhode Island 2014State Bridge Profile Rhode Island 2014
State Bridge Profile Rhode Island 2014
 
State Bridge Profile Louisiana 2014
State Bridge Profile Louisiana 2014State Bridge Profile Louisiana 2014
State Bridge Profile Louisiana 2014
 
California State Bridge Profile
California State Bridge ProfileCalifornia State Bridge Profile
California State Bridge Profile
 
State Bridge Profiles Alaska 2014
State Bridge Profiles Alaska 2014 State Bridge Profiles Alaska 2014
State Bridge Profiles Alaska 2014
 
State Bridge Profile Utah 2014
State Bridge Profile Utah 2014State Bridge Profile Utah 2014
State Bridge Profile Utah 2014
 
State Bridge Profile Texas 2014
State Bridge Profile Texas 2014State Bridge Profile Texas 2014
State Bridge Profile Texas 2014
 
State Bridge Profile Hawaii 2014
State Bridge Profile Hawaii 2014State Bridge Profile Hawaii 2014
State Bridge Profile Hawaii 2014
 
State Bridge Profile Nebraska 2014
State Bridge Profile Nebraska 2014State Bridge Profile Nebraska 2014
State Bridge Profile Nebraska 2014
 

More from artba

2017 media kit
2017 media kit2017 media kit
2017 media kitartba
 
September October tb_2016
September October tb_2016September October tb_2016
September October tb_2016artba
 
Transportation Builder July/August 2016
Transportation Builder July/August 2016Transportation Builder July/August 2016
Transportation Builder July/August 2016artba
 
The National Work Zone Management Conference Agenda 2016
The National Work Zone Management Conference Agenda 2016The National Work Zone Management Conference Agenda 2016
The National Work Zone Management Conference Agenda 2016artba
 
ARTBA 2016 National Convention Program
ARTBA 2016 National Convention ProgramARTBA 2016 National Convention Program
ARTBA 2016 National Convention Programartba
 
May/June Transportation Builder
May/June Transportation BuilderMay/June Transportation Builder
May/June Transportation Builderartba
 
Northeastern regional meeting
Northeastern regional meetingNortheastern regional meeting
Northeastern regional meetingartba
 
Southern regional meeting
Southern regional meetingSouthern regional meeting
Southern regional meetingartba
 
Central regional meeting
Central regional meetingCentral regional meeting
Central regional meetingartba
 
Western regional meeting
Western regional meetingWestern regional meeting
Western regional meetingartba
 
Western regional meeting
Western regional meetingWestern regional meeting
Western regional meetingartba
 
July/August 2015 TB magazine
July/August 2015 TB magazineJuly/August 2015 TB magazine
July/August 2015 TB magazineartba
 
September/October 2015 TB magazine
September/October 2015 TB magazineSeptember/October 2015 TB magazine
September/October 2015 TB magazineartba
 
November/December 2015 TB
November/December 2015 TBNovember/December 2015 TB
November/December 2015 TBartba
 
January/February 2016 TB
January/February 2016 TBJanuary/February 2016 TB
January/February 2016 TBartba
 
March/April 2016 TB
March/April 2016 TBMarch/April 2016 TB
March/April 2016 TBartba
 
2016 ­ARTBA FIP Schedule
2016 ­ARTBA FIP Schedule2016 ­ARTBA FIP Schedule
2016 ­ARTBA FIP Scheduleartba
 
2016 ARTBA FIP Program
2016 ARTBA FIP Program2016 ARTBA FIP Program
2016 ARTBA FIP Programartba
 
2016 ILDP Agenda
2016 ILDP Agenda2016 ILDP Agenda
2016 ILDP Agendaartba
 
P3 Agenda 2016
P3 Agenda 2016P3 Agenda 2016
P3 Agenda 2016artba
 

More from artba (20)

2017 media kit
2017 media kit2017 media kit
2017 media kit
 
September October tb_2016
September October tb_2016September October tb_2016
September October tb_2016
 
Transportation Builder July/August 2016
Transportation Builder July/August 2016Transportation Builder July/August 2016
Transportation Builder July/August 2016
 
The National Work Zone Management Conference Agenda 2016
The National Work Zone Management Conference Agenda 2016The National Work Zone Management Conference Agenda 2016
The National Work Zone Management Conference Agenda 2016
 
ARTBA 2016 National Convention Program
ARTBA 2016 National Convention ProgramARTBA 2016 National Convention Program
ARTBA 2016 National Convention Program
 
May/June Transportation Builder
May/June Transportation BuilderMay/June Transportation Builder
May/June Transportation Builder
 
Northeastern regional meeting
Northeastern regional meetingNortheastern regional meeting
Northeastern regional meeting
 
Southern regional meeting
Southern regional meetingSouthern regional meeting
Southern regional meeting
 
Central regional meeting
Central regional meetingCentral regional meeting
Central regional meeting
 
Western regional meeting
Western regional meetingWestern regional meeting
Western regional meeting
 
Western regional meeting
Western regional meetingWestern regional meeting
Western regional meeting
 
July/August 2015 TB magazine
July/August 2015 TB magazineJuly/August 2015 TB magazine
July/August 2015 TB magazine
 
September/October 2015 TB magazine
September/October 2015 TB magazineSeptember/October 2015 TB magazine
September/October 2015 TB magazine
 
November/December 2015 TB
November/December 2015 TBNovember/December 2015 TB
November/December 2015 TB
 
January/February 2016 TB
January/February 2016 TBJanuary/February 2016 TB
January/February 2016 TB
 
March/April 2016 TB
March/April 2016 TBMarch/April 2016 TB
March/April 2016 TB
 
2016 ­ARTBA FIP Schedule
2016 ­ARTBA FIP Schedule2016 ­ARTBA FIP Schedule
2016 ­ARTBA FIP Schedule
 
2016 ARTBA FIP Program
2016 ARTBA FIP Program2016 ARTBA FIP Program
2016 ARTBA FIP Program
 
2016 ILDP Agenda
2016 ILDP Agenda2016 ILDP Agenda
2016 ILDP Agenda
 
P3 Agenda 2016
P3 Agenda 2016P3 Agenda 2016
P3 Agenda 2016
 

Michigan State Bridge Profile

  • 1. © 2014 The American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of ARTBA. Highlights from FHWA’s 2013 National Bridge Inventory Data:  Of the 11,022 bridges in the state, 1,298 bridges, or 12% are classified as structurally deficient. This means one or more of the key bridge elements, such as the deck, superstructure or substructure, is considered to be in “poor” or worse condition.1  There are 1,720 bridges, or 16% of all state bridges, classified as functionally obsolete. This means the bridge does not meet design standards that are in line with current practice.  Federal-aid investment in Michigan has supported $2.3 billion in bridge construction spending on 5,322 bridges between 2003 and 2012, according to FHWA data.2  Since 2004, 916 new bridges have been constructed in the state and 664 bridges have undergone major reconstruction.  The state estimates that it would cost approximately $6.2 billion to fix a total of 2,076 bridges in the state.3 Bridge Inventory: All Bridges Structurally deficient Bridges Type of Bridge Total Number Area (sq. meters) Daily Crossings Total Number Area (sq. meters) Daily Crossings Rural Bridges Interstate 390 356,598 7,078,144 14 9,687 341,557 Other principal arterial 613 375,071 5,193,168 25 9,802 190,755 Minor arterial 620 286,705 3,287,188 55 25,772 278,912 Major collector 2,074 664,351 4,441,228 306 68,376 583,555 Minor collector 537 128,125 498,658 70 11,601 50,448 Local 3,116 531,129 1,545,410 524 53,569 161,180 Urban Bridges Interstate 826 1,396,818 29,877,980 54 190,154 1,932,654 Other freeway 315 332,302 7,954,389 16 17,370 256,736 Principal arterial 680 844,678 15,004,474 45 50,124 799,731 Minor arterial 809 747,099 9,880,261 94 64,919 1,133,645 Collector 470 298,362 3,687,442 40 21,354 215,314 Local 572 313,075 2,999,596 55 19,769 195,505 Not classified 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 11,022 6,274,311 91,447,938 1,298 542,496 6,139,992 1 According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a bridge is classified as structurally deficient if the condition rating for the deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert and retaining walls is rated 4 or below or if the bridge receives an appraisal rating of 2 or less for structural condition or waterway adequacy. During inspections, the condition of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition and the individual element displays signs of advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour. 2 ARTBA analysis of FHWA data, includes all bridge construction related spending on projects approved by FHWA between 2003 and 2012. 3 This data is provided by bridge owners as part of the FHWA data and is required for any bridge eligible for the Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program. However, for some states this amount is very low and likely not an accurate reflection of current costs. State Bridge Profile Michigan
  • 2. © 2014 The American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of ARTBA. Proposed bridge work: Type of Work Number Cost (millions) Daily Crossings Area (sq. meters) Bridge replacement 795 $4,383.8 2,072,555 156,017 Widening & rehabilitation 78 $35.9 1,296,269 44,497 Rehabilitation 178 $722.1 774,033 75,355 Deck rehabilitation/replacement 830 $949.9 10,456,793 837,554 Other work 195 $91.2 431,674 82,194 Top 10 Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in the State County Year Built Daily Crossings Type of Bridge Location (route/water under the bridge, traffic on the bridge and location) Wayne 1954 146,000 Urban minor arterial I-94, SECOND BLVD, IN DETROIT Wayne 1953 119,000 Urban Interstate OPEN AREA, I-94 TO W GR BLV R, IN DETROIT Wayne 1967 100,492 Urban Interstate ROUGE R DEARBORN ST & RR, I-75, IN DETROIT Genesee 1971 95,314 Urban Interstate M-54 (DORT HWY), I-69, IN FLINT Macomb 1994 87,420 Urban other principal arterial M-53, M-59 WB, M-59 WB OV M-53 Genesee 1954 66,912 Urban Interstate SWARTZ CREEK, I-75, N OF I-69 @ INTERCHG Oakland 1964 65,985 Urban Interstate M-150 (ROCHESTER RD.), I-75 SB, IN TROY Wayne 1962 65,737 Urban Interstate ECORSE RD, I-94 WB, IN TAYLOR OVER ECORSE RD Jackson 1949 64,800 Urban Interstate CONRAIL & GRAND RIVER, I-94, 0.4 MI W OF M-106 Genesee 1971 59,000 Urban Interstate ATHERTON RD, I-475, IN FLINT Sources: All data is from the 2013 National Bridge Inventory, released by the Federal Highway Administration in March 2014. Note that specific conditions on bridge may have changed as a result of recent work. Cost estimates of bridge work provided as part of the data and have been adjusted to 2013$ for inflation and estimated project costs. Contract awards data is for state and local government awards and comes from McGraw Hill. Note that additional bridge investment may be a part of other contract awards if a smaller bridge project is included with a highway project, and that would not be accounted for in the total in this profile.