An organization called the Repository for Germinal choice in Escondido, CA once served as a sperm bank for Nobel Prize winners and others possessing high IQs. Dozens of babies have now been produced by artificial insemination from the sperm bank. Do you regard this as wise or unwise, ethic or unethical, foolish or inspired? Solution The major rising ethical challenge is the connection between the pre-selection of embryos for \"babies with high IQ (intelligent quoscent) based on meticulous genetic analysis of sperm donation & artificial insemination followed by rising discrimination of \"disabled people\". Therefore, even though, it is a \"wise methodology\" but highly \"unethical\" and foolish due to chances of occurrence of genetic abnormalities. This ethical problem is associated with selection of future children based on their low levels of disabilities and abnormalities. The genetic abnormalities of prenatal baby with any other serious diseases but this method of screening is leading to reinforcement of disable people discrimination and stigmatization. There is chance of unintended multiple pregnancy & success rate is lesser. The meticulous ethical factor associated with donated sperm (for high IQ) via artificial insemination is any presence of sexually transmitted diseases (HIV etc), genetic disease carriers (sickle cell anemia). This methodology is regarded as “wise protocol” to those women who are unable to participate in sexual intercourse followed by sperm implantation into the women fallopian tube for fertilization with egg..

1. An organization called the Repository for Germinal choice in Escondido, CA once served as a
sperm bank for Nobel Prize winners and others possessing high IQs. Dozens of babies have now
been produced by artificial insemination from the sperm bank. Do you regard this as wise or
unwise, ethic or unethical, foolish or inspired?
Solution
The major rising ethical challenge is the connection between the pre-selection of embryos for
"babies with high IQ (intelligent quoscent) based on meticulous genetic analysis of sperm
donation & artificial insemination followed by rising discrimination of "disabled people".
Therefore, even though, it is a "wise methodology" but highly "unethical" and foolish due to
chances of occurrence of genetic abnormalities. This ethical problem is associated with selection
of future children based on their low levels of disabilities and abnormalities. The genetic
abnormalities of prenatal baby with any other serious diseases but this method of screening is
leading to reinforcement of disable people discrimination and stigmatization. There is chance of
unintended multiple pregnancy & success rate is lesser. The meticulous ethical factor associated
with donated sperm (for high IQ) via artificial insemination is any presence of sexually
transmitted diseases (HIV etc), genetic disease carriers (sickle cell anemia). This methodology is
regarded as “wise protocol” to those women who are unable to participate in sexual intercourse
followed by sperm implantation into the women fallopian tube for fertilization with egg.