Book Banning Essay

Book Banning Essay
Book banning has been used throughout history as a way to control the ideas of a society. It is "a
form of censorship that attempts to control the dissemination of thoughts and ideas that some groups
in society believe to be harmful"("Book Banning"). Governments and religious bodies have tried to
ban books with differing or revolutionary views. Today, the top reasons books are banned are
because of sexual content, objectionable language, violence, homosexual themes, racism, and
religion (Whelan). The argument of book banning is seen in communities, school boards, public
libraries, and state legislature, and can involve governments, corporations, book publishers, and
private citizens ("Introduction To Book Banning: At Issue"). Book banning ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
"Good books have always caused people to think, and since few of us think alike, controversy is
guaranteed" (Gallo). If a child is to think for themselves, they must learn about and consider other
points of view. They must be able to form their own views of the world around them, and they
cannot do that completely without needed information.
The parents who want to ban books from libraries do not seem to trust their children to know what
books they are ready for or not. If a child starts to read a book and does not like the content that is in
it, then they can decide to stop reading it and choose a book that they like better. The people who
ban books do not trust their children to be able make the right decisions for themselves, and thus do
not respect them in their decisions. Additionally, banning books often has the opposite effect of what
was planned, making more people interested in the book and want to read it.
In the future,books in libraries and schools should be judged on the story in it and not just the
content. New ideas are needed to develop different points of view and learn about the world. Books
should not be banned because it shows disrespect to the rights of the children and restricts their
ability to learn new
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Book Banning
For the reasons of violence, religious viewpoints, offensive language, and sexuality some of the
world's best written novels and short stories are being banned from schools everywhere. As I look at
the world around me, I see the things that books, such as The Great Gatsby, To Kill a Mockingbird,
and even The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, are banned for. I hear racial slurs, vulgar language,
see violent video games, and even people being very sexual in public, and yet people are still
banning books that are like the real world because they do not want the children of this nations to
read about the things they see in their day–to–day lives. I find that preposterous. Oscar Wilde once
said "The books that the world calls immoral are books ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Now, I am not saying they need get rid of rap or the television shows that show that type of
behavior, but only to suppress the unruliness is in the world of media today. No one can stop a child
from seeing what is really going on in the world, no matter how hard people try, kids will find out
every terrible thing that could happen in this world, they are smarter than any of us realize. Yes, they
will find it out eventually, but they are just kids. If we ban the books that are controversial, how will
they know how to deal with the problems, or cope with the fact that there are horrendous things in
this world? We will be taking the fight out of them. Everyone has a choice on how they act and we
should give the future generations a chance to fight for the right of knowledge and the power to lead
this nation into its true potential and the right to help them change this world. We should never ban
books that would help our future grow. Oscar Wilde had also stated "Those who find ugly meanings
in beautiful things are corrupt without being charming. This is a fault. Those who find beautiful
meanings in beautiful things are the cultivated. For these there is hope. They are the elect to whom
beautiful things mean only Beauty. There is no such thing as a moral or an immoral book. Books are
well written, or badly

Essay On Breed Banning
Most dog owners and lovers would agree that pets are like family. Each animal with their own
personality, responses, and personal temperament. It is nearly impossible to create broad
generalizations based just on one breed. Breed specific legislation, or breed banning, is an ordinance
passed by local government basically outlawing a specific breed or group of breeds of dogs that are
considered dangerous.
Banning specific breeds is not an effective method for keeping the public safe from dog bites or
attacks. The ban does not account for differences in each dog's temperament, socialization, or
behavior displayed by individual dogs, but groups all dogs of specific breeds as dangerous. Breed
banning does not control the problem of dangerous ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I myself own a two year old female American pit bull. She has never shown any kind of aggression,
yet, it is nearly impossible for me to live in any apartment home due to these breed restrictions.
Although these dogs are stereotyped as being "dangerous", bite statistics, when accurately reported,
do not back up those claims. The first thing is to find out which dogs are doing the biting. Dundee
Hospital in the UK conducted a study designed to analyze bite reports and medical attention
required by bite victims over a three month period before and after the implementation of a breed
ban specifically targeting pit bulls. The results indicated no change in the number of bites reported.
Banning pit bulls did nothing to change the amount of dog bites.
Most breed laws are poorly written and do not take into account the individual temperaments of the
dogs considered vicious. Mandatory leash laws are much more effective in controlling dog bites,
when the proper resources are available to enforce the laws. Mandatory leash laws do not stereotype
dogs based on their breed and put the responsibility back in the hands of the owner. Some cities
have bans so strict that if a specific breed, usually pit bulls, and or pit bull mixes is within city limits
that have the breed ban, the dogs are confiscated and

Banning Books
The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Beloved, Gone with the Wind, The Grapes of Wrath, The
Jungles, all of these books are vital to our lives. They shaped the good part of American that made
people here now. These great novels both teach important values and educate children about world
affairs and classic themes. Sadly, these great novels were soon banned from local libraries, schools
and others. Most classical books and stories have been banned because of profanity, sexual ideas,
racial, religious, and witchcraft. Many may think that this is inappropriate, lots of English classes
have read these books that has been assigned. First, I believe that education should be allowed to
everyone who can get their hands on it. Everyone should have the opportunity to read English
literature. Micah Issitt lists "three basic rights cover under the freedom of press: the right to publish,
the right to confidentiality of sources, and the right of citizens to access the products of the press."
Furthermore, the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
First of all, books are one of our best teachers because you can learn so much from different writers
with their experience and how it can relate to yours. For example, books can teach you than regular
teachers. Books can teach you more to life than teachers. Books can teach us the value of life and
how to respect it. Books can teach us how to understand others. their past experiences. How they
lived in their books. Another example is that books teaches how to use our vocabulary. Books can
teach us many more than we have already known by regular teachers. It makes us think. Makes us
visualize what you read. Finally, I believe that books should not be banned because we can learn life
lessons from books than we can from teachers. For instance, books can change the way we feel after
life. They can teach us compassion. Books talks about others actual lives that can affect us

Essay On Banning Books
Since 1982, all kinds of books have been banned for the content they hold. Topics like race, sexually
explicit content, homosexualaity, religion and more. Books are banned by librarians and teachers
because they do not want children or teenagers to read about these topics. Children and teenagers
are told they are not supposed to read these books with harsh topics because they are afraid it could
influence them. They are afraid that books that talk about suicide, like 13 Reasons Why, will
influence teenagers into committing suicide. Books being banned does not mean teenagers or
children will not be able to get ahold of them some way. Just because certain books have topics
teacher, librarians, and parents do not like, does not mean they should be banned from teenagers and
children to read and learn about. Books with these topics can introduce children and teenagers ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They get banned because of the naked truth of their subjects. Stories that touch on the harsh reality
of racism are deemed inappropriate for school. "The classics have one thing in common: they say
something humanity needs to hear, and they say it masterfully," Was stated in one of the articles.
The classics, along with other stories about the history of the world, tell us things we do not want to
hear. Because of books using harsh topics like what is going on with the world, they get banned
from libraries and schools. Banning books about the world's past and present will not, and does not
change a single thing, other than the children or teenager being under educated over the subjects.
Banning books that include subjects about the US history, and rough patches that America and other
countries have hit does not change the fact that they happened. Not allowing teenagers, and children
to read these books is only harming them in the long

Banning The Outsiders
In 1967, a 17–year–old author S.E Hinton, published her first novel from a point of view of a
teenage boy named Ponyboy in The Outsiders. The story takes place in Tulsa, Oklahoma in 1966.
The book introduces two gangs, the Greasers and the Socials. The Greasers are "kids from the poor
side or East Side of town and the Socials or Socs are the rich kids from West–side." (Hinton pg10).
The book started to stir controversy due to the realistic issues of teens involved in gang violence,
alcoholism, and drugs. Challenges to the book came in 1986 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The
Outsiders does not deserve to be banned because though the book contains mature material, it
provides an important insight of how teenagers in both social economic groups deal with their
problems. The author of the book, Susan–Elouise Hinton, or S.E Hinton, wrote The Outsiders while
in high school. The author, born in Tulsa, Oklahoma July 22, 1948, like many other girls of the mid
to late 60's ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The main character, Ponyboy feels like his life as a Greasers puts him outside of what he considers
the norm, which include parents, structure and living within the law. Another theme of the book
appears in the "black and white world" (Fleming) these characters live in. Constantly at war with
each other, the two gangs "rumble" to solve their issues, no comprise or grey area. They always live
in this world of violence and death, with smoking and drinking, their escape from their pain. Many
young readers empathize with these characters which some adults find to be a dangerous thing.
Influenced teenagers might believe that smoking and drinking make them cool and fighting instead
of talking it out, will solve their problems. The dilemma of planting the seed of poor decision
encourages censorship. With guidance from adults, these readers can learn from the deeper meaning
that with perseverance things will get better that the story

Banning Zoos
I think that zoos should be banned because I believe that all animal should have freedom and not be
captured and put in a cage and viewed by people. Imagine you're at the zoo and you see a lion
pacing back and forth what do you think? Is he ok?
One reason I think animals should be released into the wild is the people that work at the zoo don't
build them a normal habit by normal I mean may not be the right temperature or not good room. My
evidence is polar bears live in the cold big atlantic at the zoo it's warm and small. I Also think they
should make the habit bigger for the animals. Another fact is the zoo's enclosure is 1000 times
smaller than the freedom they get in the wild. That's why i think animals should be free.

Banning Teens
What would you do to make sure that your business does not get shut down? Some restaurants are
already banning teens, some cannot allow minors due to certain laws. The owner of "Munchy's" is
planning on banning teens from noon to 3 p.m. He wants to do this to increase the number of adults
going to the store. Teens can be disruptive, noisy, messy, and do not spend as much money as adults
do, this is why being able to ban teens is a good thing for business. In source two the pie chart and
bar graph show how adult to minor ratio changes drastically as the school year begins. Adult
customers decrease while minors increase, but adult spending is still higher while their numbers are
lower than that of minors. From my personal experience I have witnessed teens to be more chaotic
that adults in public places and sometimes I see it drives people away. They also spend less since
they do not all have jobs or earn so much and not they do not always buy food when they go to
restaurants. I have also seen teens ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I sometimes I hear adults being loud and constantly talking as well, but teens are always playing
their music loud or talking loud. I learned this through personal experience sometimes me and my
friends are loud, but we are never as loud as other groups of teens. When teens are loud that is when
other customers are usually start to leave or do not even bother going into the place since they want
to be somewhere more relaxing to eat. Adults and teens both can be messy and disruptive, but adults
do spend more and are more mature. More adults will start showing up when teens are banned
because the adults will enjoy being in a less chaotic place that is also more sanitary. Restaurants will
earn more income and have to not deal with minors. These are the reasons why I agree with banning
teens from restaurants is a good

Banning Advertisements
Advertisement can be both good and bad at the same time. Dependent upon how it is interperated,
advertising is helpful to the extent of flooding money into our economy. It's also harmful to children
because they are easily manipulated in believe the need said advertised product. So, the arguement is
self–education or legislation, which is the best road to take to solve the issue. In the first passage one
writer states "Our government should protect our youth by banning advertisements that target
them.", which emphasizes the problem is so bad the government needs to step in and handle the
situation. The writer also states how much currency is being spent because of advertisement,
therefore boosting the economy. Banning or limiting advertising

Banning Pitbulls
Euthanizing banned dogs
Dog lovers and the public have been raving about a topic that has gone viral and is soon to be on the
rise: painless putting band dogs down. It is believed by many around the world that these animals
are vicious, and aggressive by nature. By reason and choice I also believe aggressive pit bulls and
other banned breed dogs should be destroyed by euthanasia, and any further breeding should be
terminated. These specific breeds of dogs are very unpredictable, and are seen to have an aggressive
nature. They also leave a long line of countless and unnecessary deaths in its wake. Some argue if
these dogs cease to exist altogether then there would be no problems, as they would just be replaced
by less vicious dogs. Many people would argue Pit bulls and other banned dogs are always only as
good as the environment they are raised in, and the kind of stress they are put under.
Pitt bulls and other banned dogs are known to be unpredictable, even to their own owners. It is
common for most attacks to be against another ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For some, They getaway with just a few ghastly scratcches, but others arent so lucky.In a recent 11–
year period, from 2005 to 2015, pit bulls killed 232 Americans, about one citizen every 17 days.14
By 2018, pit bulls are projected to have mauled to death 338 Americans since 1998, the year the
CDC stopped tracking fatal dog attacks by breed, and over 415 people since 1980–google. Many
victims of these attacks aren't fortunate enough to come back with their lives, and those who do can
often have deformed body parts. "Victims of severe dog attacks often suffer acute damage, which
may require $250,000 to one million dollars in specialized medical care treatment. Reconstructive
surgery, such as skin grafts, tissue expansion and scar diminishment, often requires multiple
procedures over a period of years"–

Is Banning Books Constitutional?
Is banning books constitutional?
The Catcher in the Rye. The Scarlet Letter. Huckleberry Finn. Harry Potter. The Diary of Anne
Frank. Animal Farm. To Kill a Mockingbird. The Da Vinci Code. The Grapes of Wrath. These
literary classics have been vital to the education of many, especially children and adolescents
(Banned Books). These great novels both teach important values and educate children about world
affairs and classic themes. Unfortunately, each of these novels has been banned at one point in time.
In a country where freedom is so adamantly advocated, it is a wonder that an issue like censorship
would even come up, that such a controversy would sink its claws into the minds of states' boards of
education across the nation. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"Protecting one of our most fundamental rights– the freedom to read– means respecting each other's
differences and the right of all people to choose for themselves, what they and their families read."
So, how is it that boards of education are the ones making decisions on books? Which ones should
be censored? What right do they have to do so? The boards are not the ones who should be held
accountable for what books children and adolescents absorb; this is primarily the responsibility of
parents.
Many conservative groups make the argument that the books that have been banned have material
that is inappropriate, immoral or contradicting the beliefs they have ingrained in their children
and/or their society. Book–banning cases usually concern the protection of children and their
innocence, but all that is happening is sheltering parents trying to avoid an awkward confrontation
with their child about uncomfortable matters. It is not only selfish, but also harmful to the overall
education of their children. The touchy subjects of banned books contain issues that are part of
everyday life, and for a group to attempt to censor this subject from younger society is almost
absurd; these issues are not monstrous and the censorship of them not only shows prejudice but lack
of respect. Others would say that it is the government's duty to regulate these books. It is the exact

Essay On Banning Book
Banning books that some people consider inappropriate could prevent the knowledge of past history,
as well as intelligence and different aspects of opinions. For all these reasons, I believe that books
should not be banned! Banning books is similar banning the freedom of expression. Not only can
banning books prevent this, but it also prevents people from being able to learn from real issues that
authors want to share with their readers. The book All Quiet on the Western Front is about a young
man, who fights in the German army on the French front in World War I. Paul describes the war as
he lives it and explains the living conditions he experiences in the trenches and on the frontline.
Therefore, there is lots of emotion and opinion in this ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many people don't comprehend how traumatic the life of a young fighter in World War I was. In my
opinion, this book will especially help you understand this. The descriptive language describing the
wounds and unpleasant content made me feel queasy at times, but also forced me to feel
compassionate for the military troops. In this book, limbs are lost, animals such as horses are killed,
starving soldiers dig through garbage for food, the troops are destroyed by poison gas, munitions,
and bombs. The conditions the fighters went through in the war was dangerous and disturbing which
makes me realize how fortunate my life is and causes me to feel compassion for the fighters because
of what they had to struggle with. In conclusion, I believe this book should not be banned for all my
reasons stated and that banning historical, educational books should be illegal. Many the books that
have been challenged or banned have a valuable message and/or learning experience. Many of the
banned books can teach us history, vocabulary, social skills, and new ways of thinking. In my
opinion, a banned book out of any type of book, is the best way to improve our

Banning Of Books
Books have been burned all threw out time one of the most recent events in history is the Holocaust
but most people don't know how many books were burned 2,000 books were burned On the night of
May 10, 1933 Several German students threw them in the fire while singing Nazi Anthems. They
did this because the books were against the Nazi regime, soon as the United States heard of this we
complained vigorously. Thru history books have been banned and america has a free society,
meaning we can have any book we want but books are still banned in schools for example Hans
Christian Andersen's Fairy Tales. They are extremely bloody and is not allowed in middle schools in
New York for promoting violence. In some cases even death as shown as in

Social Group And My Micro Community
Joe Buscaino, a councilman of Los Angeles, said, "A community of faith has come together to stand
for peace and justice, and here we are. Hundreds of Wilmington Residents coming together to stand
together as a community to say, 'enough is enough, basta!'". Buscaino said this because Wilmington
was in a time of despair. The gang members murdered two teenagers and the Wilmington Residents
have had enough with the act of violence. In the past, Wilmington has gone through multiple killings
a day until the homicide of two people. They all decided to walk for peace and justice because
people, human beings do not deserve to be killed for revenge or retaliation. This demonstrates the
partial of my community. Wilmington faces two main concepts: education and environment. I
identify myself in many ways based on my community, my social group and my micro community.
These factors have shaped me to the person I am today. Today, I live in a small city that is known as
the "Heart of the Harbor", Wilmington. According to "Early Views of San Pedro and Wilmington",
Phineas Banning procured the 640 acres of land that would get to be Wilmington. The 21–mile
railroad was built in the late 1860's by Banning and the new railroad drastically decreased the cost
of transporting goods to and from San Pedro ("Early Views of San Pedro and Wilmington"). Without
Banning's vision and tenacity, the City of Los Angeles the way everybody knows it, would not exist.
Since then, the population has been growing

A situation that parents and people found to be justice for banning a certain book happened during a
court case. "On April 18, 2000, a twice–convicted child molester named Charles Davis was found
guilty in San Diego Superior Court of possessing child pornography" ("Library Censorship is
Justified"). The man had found some art that featured naked girls, but the book that he had retrieved
these photos from happened to come from a library. Pictures such as these are illegal and should not
be in libraries for children or teens to stumble across. Davis argued that his photos were art, but
Judge Kennedy did not find this to be true. In the court case, Board of Education v Pico, the court
can ban a vulgar book ("Library Censorship is Justified"). ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Banning books stops a student from being creative, and teachers have experimented with banned
books to prove that students won't turn into delinquents when studying this literature. Smiley
introduced his eight–grade class to the topic of banned books, and the first lesson the students
already knew that banning books was wrong. The students felt that they should choose what they
should and should not read (Smiley, 55). Parents may feel over protective of their children, because
they worry about their children encountering something that changes them forever; however,
students know what is right for them and what isn't right for them. At the end of the study, many
students felt that banning books was not right, and one student continued with their belief that
choosing what to read is up to the student (Smiley, 56–7). These students attend school to learn right
from wrong, so they most likely won't go out and study the bad things. Teachers aren't telling
students to become the characters and to start acting out, so students won't hope to aspire like these
people. Many other student experiments were done for the students to properly learn about banned

The Banning Of Banning Catcher In The Rye
There are numerous banned books which are removed from shelves due to their controversial
content not only just in America but also around the world. The novel, The Catcher in the Rye,
written by J.D. Salinger is one of the most well–known "censored publications" throughout
American schools. The novel, set in the 1950s, is narrated by a sixteen–year–old boy named Holden
Caulfield. The story begins in a mental hospital where Holden is undergoing treatment. From there,
he tells his account of his expulsion from school and his subsequent lonesome journey throughout
New York, all of which happened leading up to his voluntary admission into the sanitorium. Most of
the novel's adversaries argue that the book should be banned due to its vulgar content including the
constant use of profanity, the apparent thoughts of violence, and the descriptions of sexual activity.
On the contrary, I believe that this novel should not be banned because it brings attention to mental
illness. The most valid argument supporting the banning of The Catcher in the Rye is the abundant
usage of profanity. The novel is composed of a variety of negative language which helps define
Holden's character. Salinger uses multiple words with negative connotations such as: "lousy",
"bastard", "sonuvabitch", and "phony". It is no surprise that "three of the top five words in The
Catcher in the Rye – "goddam", "hell" and "damn" – are curse words..." (Taylor). So, in a "perfect
world" nobody should approve of this

The Banning Of The Headscarf
In most countries around the world, it is not uncommon to see a woman in an article of clothing that
is representative of the Muslim faith and history. This type of dress is typically worn in countries
located in the Middle East. The wardrobe of a woman in these countries would contain articles such
as an al–Amira, burka, or a hijab. Some women wear these clothing items for religious or traditional
purposes, but others wear them solely by choice. However, there are certain countries around the
world that oppose the wearing of certain Muslim–style clothing. One country in particular, Turkey,
does not issue total support of the wearing of headscarves for women. In fact, the government has
issued a ban on the wearing of headscarves by women in government facilitated places. The banning
of the headscarf is a heavily debated subject in Turkey due to political and social beliefs of the
Turkish people. Since the ban was put into existence, the Turkish people, specifically women, have
felt the negative effects that have resulted from it. The headscarf is an item of clothing that is worn
by Turkish women for several reasons, not solely for religious practices. The scarf has a deep history
behind it, stemming from the Ottoman influence on the Middle East. Since the beginning of the
headscarf wearing, the framework of the headscarf has developed into many different ideals.
Different groups of women wear the item for different purposes. Marlene Breau explains that the
scarf can be

The Irony Of Banning Books In Schools
Once upon a time, in a world not far from here, there are students who are forced to miss their
annual train ride to Hogwarts, lock the wardrobe to the magical land of Narnia, and walk through
the English countryside themselves instead of upon the back of Black Beauty. Why are these
students deprived of those occurrences? They live in America, the land of the free– except when it
comes to the books they can read. In fact, many schools across America exercise the practice of
banning books. Since 1982, libraries, parents, and schools have attempted to ban 11,300 novels,
according to the American Library Association. The essentially innoxious books are challenged for
an assortment of reasons, including use of malapropos language, graphic or explicit ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Supporters of banning say profanity can negatively influence the actions and thoughts of readers,
especially younger readers that may not have heard or read many corrupt words. Huckleberry Finn,
a book commonly inveighed for its use of contentious racial language, is commonly challenged for
that reason. For USA Today, Martha Moore wrote, "When the younger reader is staring at that word
five times on a given page and the instructor is saying, 'Mark Twain didn't mean this and you have to
read it with an appreciation of irony,' you're asking a lot of a younger reader". Granted, foul
vocabulary is a challenge that academies need to address, but not through barring novels. Besides, if
the reader is sufficiently mature for the book, they can still learn from it. For instance, some racial
characterizations do not intentionally persecute people, but show the contrasting tensions between
them, conforming to the time period. Again, the article "Huck Finn Navigating Choppy Waters
Again" revealed, "The word is there for a reason... The word is terrible, it's hurtful, but it's there for
a reason" (Moore). The racial epithets used in that book convey the attitude of Missouri in the 1840s
when friction between African Americans and white people was rising. Additionally, banning a book
due to concerns about the language is not beneficial to pupils because it prevents them from learning
from other components of the book. "Often the organizations or schools that ban these books fail to
see the book as a whole; they often center on the one page, the one scene or even the one word
containing the offensive language or meaning and judge the whole book based on that one aspect,"
according to an article by Adriana Lopez. She makes a sound point. A book contains a whole plot
with themes that

Banning Books Essay
Name
Professor
Course
Date
The practice of censorship and banning of books in learning institution has been prevalent mostly
due to the explicit content incorporated in them. However, banning of certain books in pretense to
conceal content perceived inappropriate to impressionable children is an infringement of their right
to access information of their area of choice. While banning some book at times has valid reasons, it
is important to endorse and emphasize that every child has the liberty to select, at their discretion,
which book to read. While it is agreeable that parents and teachers should play a noble role in
regulating books that entail controversial topics as well as educating their children as their primary
guardian, their right does not extend to controlling and monitoring what children read ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Book censorship and bans only primes to conformity and thus limiting the variety and range of
expression as well as inquiry on which the philosophy depends. Banning and censoring reading
materials is capable of limiting the technological innovations, research as well as creativity. It is
hence the responsibility of the democracy to avail a diversity of views whether popular or unpopular
and else should not coerce the opinions and ideas of some while inhibiting the exertions of others
(Memphis, 1). Rather than banning books content, publishers should rather give complete
connotation to the liberty of reading by providing books capable of enriching the diversity as well as
the quality of knowledge. Reading liberation is of diminutive consequence not unless the reader
obtains materials suiting their purposes. Books should hence not be banned due to diverse peoples
conflicting views either since one is not entitled to agree with what he reads but should rather learn
from it. For instance, history aids students in knowing the events that transpired to shape the world
as it is

The idea to ban certain books from schools and libraries is preposterous due to the manner in which
the people trying to enforce these bans try to do so in. Banning books doesn't help with the already
present problem that our youth's intelligence levels are already declining, and neither does allowing
the freedom to all books. Banning certain books due to their constant use of inappropriate language,
sexually explicit nature, and all around mature content has a respectfully reasonable reason to be
inaccessible to younger audiences such as minors and teens; not young adults. The banning of books
in libraries is outright inexcusable, unless the material is directly racist, subjective religious content,
and all around hatred for a certain race or ethnicity; not if it's used for fictional writing, in a softer
manner mid you, to express the conflict in a story and/or to show real world problems, same go for
non–fictional writing that expresses ideals in a manner of which isn't disrespectful to other ideals
and that do so in a manner of which isn't so subjectively and deliberately showing hate for a certain
race or ethnicity, especially ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
But, in schools we have minors, teens, adolescents, children, etc. that would have access to all this
mature content, which would rob them from one of the most important types of knowledge that you
may gain: experience. The ability to experience is what allows us to learn in the first place, learning
others experiences and their ideas is wonderful, but getting the true, raw knowledge is so much more
satisfying for reasons I could not explain simply. I am not saying we should be entirely defensive on
what students should read, but we should be more mindful and responsible on what they

The Banning Of Books
Have you ever needed to read a book about something but couldn't because of other people had
distant opinions on the book and they didn't let you?When reading an article about censorship and
books being banned and challenged, there will be many surprising facts ,important details ,keywords
,and connections made and different point of views from everyone. After reading an article in the
afternoon at school about a book being banned some of the info in the article surprised me, however
there was some info that was important because it showed that some people really care about books
being challenged or banned. Seeing how people are eager to fight to get a book reinstated is very
interesting because when people challenge a book countless people ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In the book whale talk the main character is T.J Jones (the tao Jones) his mother abandoned him
when she got addicted to drugs so T.J grew up with rage issues. One day his favorite teacher inspires
T.J to start a school swim team he does and jumbles together a team of student underdogs to
embarrass his high school's best athletic program. This book "Whale Talk" has been challenged
because of the 140 profane words, including the "F" word 17 times and the "N" word used
repeatedly. There are sexual content ,drug use ,suicide ,violence ,and reference to smoking. As said
by Debry Bryk in her article called "Remove the book whale talk by Chris Crutcher from the
curriculum" she says "this is for 12 and up to read, but if it were a movie it would be rated R 17 and

Banning Muslims
Jihad is a term associated with terrorists who believe in war against nonbelievers. However, the
misinterpretation of this concept has created a prejudice toward the Muslim people. A majority of
the American population, like Donald Trump, are fearful of this approach against believers of other
faiths. In result, he proposes the U.S should ban all Muslims from entering the country. Over two
million Muslim families live in the United States currently. Many have been here for years, and
came to seek a better life. Unfortunately, Muslims are getting a bad reputation because of ongoing
terrorism. Furthermore, the U. S. should not take these steps towards disallowing Muslims to enter
the states. Not only would it create a hostile relationship with other Islamic countries, but it would
be considered discrimination against the faith and go against basic human principles.
If we isolate the Muslim population, the U. S will most likely cease intercontinental relations with
foreign Islamic nations. The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When muslims enter the country they deserve the same right that is given to other immigrants ;
freedom of religion. Banning muslims from entering the country because of their religious beliefs is
as preposterous as not allowing a new person into a church. The United States is a boiling pot of
ethnicities, nationalities and religions. The U.S should not ban muslims from migrating into the
country, because it will create tension among Islamic countries, separate families and be a threat
against religious freedom. People often fear things they do not understand, it seems that many
Americans are associating muslims with the ideals of terrorist groups simply because they are
unfamiliar to their religion. If the government does not look past their fear of allowing muslims into
the country, it will be alone in their struggle against real

Banning The Burqa
The burqa should not be banned because it is an assault on the most basic human right of women
having control over their bodies. Women should have the right to wear what they want to wear . It is
unreasonable to take away women's freedom concerning the way they dress because they should
have the right to wear what they want.
The main people who called for the ban of the burqa discriminate against the Muslim religion.
People should just ignore how women dress because their body is their business . They should just
be left alone. Women The fact that they their banning the burqa and not others things for example
face mask for the cold, is really idiotic because it also covers part of your face and they don't take as
big problem. Women

Banning Book
Should books be banned? Books are a gateway to a world of imagination, but some schools are
trying to shut those gates off by banning them. Books are some of the best teachers left, it's not up to
a school to decide what a child should or should not read. Banning books can deprive a child of the
opportunity to think. Books should not be banned because of the lessons they can teach, the fact that
a school should not even be able to ban them, and it can deprive a child of the opportunity to think.
Books are some of the best teachers we have "they teach us vocabulary social skills and new ways
of thinking"(leigh). It's also true that textbooks could teach a child this, but not in the way they
would learn from a story. When a child is really engaged in a story they will learn a lot more than
they think. "Books teach us history "(leigh). and many books are based on certain time periods or
cover certain events. When a child reads these stories, they will retain the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
It is reasonable for a book to be banned if it is just not suitable for children as in its mature content.
But if a book is being banned because of a parent who does not like the book or thinks it is a touchy
subject, then it is just not reasonable and there should not even be a discussion about banning it.
"Parents who don't like specific books can have their kids "opt out" of an assignment without
infringing on the rights of others." (www.procon.org/headline.php?headlineID=005365). There is no
reason for a parent to try to have a book banned because they do not like the content in the book.''
Also, the parent can choose to have their child not read the book without having it banned from the
whole school. Parents should censor their own child and not the entire

Nutritionist In Banning
As part of your diet program at RCMC Medical Center, a nutritionist in Banning will be there each
step of the way. Besides explaining the latest in healthy eating, a nutritionist actually plays a very
important, far reaching role in your success, starting with the foundation you'll use to jump start
your efforts. Starting Ground Your nutritionist will help find your starting ground. Together, you will
work to figure out where you need improvement in your current eating and lifestyle habits and how
to best to approach each aspect. As you work with your nutritionist, you will build the foundation
for the rest of your weight loss goals and long term success. When you first begin your journey at
RCMC Medical Center, you will have a complete medical screening to uncover potential medical
problems that may be contributing to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The world of weight loss is full of misinformation, frustrations, unhealthy practices, and yo–yo
results. However, working with a nutritionist in Banning can prevent these problems before they
arise. Throughout your journey, your nutritionist will help you fully understand your new diet
program, not just what to eat and what not to eat, but also how, when, and why. This will allow you
a greater chance at long term success. Not only do nutritionists help you understand your body's
relationship with the food you eat, but they also help lift you up when things look bleak by offering
heartfelt support, understanding, and encouragement. In fact, this support and encouragement is a
cornerstone in the RCMC Medical Center's treatment of weight problems. They believe that no one
should have to travel the path to weight loss alone. They will be there every step of the way to cheer
your successes, mourn your slip ups, and get you right back on track again. Your success is their
success and they don't accept

The Banning Of Banning Catcher In The Rye
Nathaniel Brewer
Mrs. Riley
AP Senior English
21 November 2017
Shady Novels
In J.D. Salinger's The Catcher in the Rye, Salinger writes about Holden Caulfield, a teenager who
flunks out of school and goes to be on his own. While doing this, he participates in many negative
actives. Ultimately, readers see how these negative things affect his life with a looming sense of him
wanting to commit suicide. However, this is not a valid reason to ban the novel. Instead critics and
readers should see past these negatives and recognize that the novel gives exposure to young people
who are encountering these issues, instead of hiding them away or banning them. This novel uses
Holden's life as a demonstration of negative aspects including, alcohol and nicotine abuse, sexual
tendencies, and obscene language to help readers better themselves. This benefits readers and
overall is a reason why the novel should not be banned.
A slather some amount of people believe that The Catcher in the Rye fits the criteria of a banned
book. Consequently these particular people immediately assume that Holden is a terrible influence
on young children. But, "In order to shelter students from profanity, is an attempt to do the
impossible. Profanity is found everywhere" (HM). Oftentimes than not, even if you ban this book
children will still hear or see profane words. The cruel language found in this novel is utmost
controversial being that it takes place in the 1950s and some of these "cruel words" are

The Banning of Books
Books allow the mind to flourish, to wonder, to become the escape from reality that is desperately
needed from time to time. Books can make no social comment, such as Dr. Seuss's "Hop on Pop",
where the reader is just allowed to escape and go into an alternate reality. Books can also make a
statement about social occurrences at the time, such as Francis Scott Key Fitzgerald's "The Great
Gatsby". Orson Scott Card's "Ender's Game" falls into a category in between where it allows the
reader into an escape from reality while making comments about the society of the time, as well a
look into an exceptional child's mind. All three of these books have something in common; they
have all been at some point have had an individual or several individuals try to ban the book. Most
often those who try to get a book banned do so due to violent or offensive content. However in some
cases the reasons the book gets banned is completely ludicrous, as it is in the case of "Ender's
Game". Card's novel "Ender's Game" was banned in Utah due to the efforts of a Mormon, who got a
hold of a Baptist ban list, unaware of one way to get on that list is to be Mormon (Card Student).
This shows that not all efforts to ban a book stem from the reader being offended by the content; in
cases like this the person banning the book has not even read the book.
"Ender's Game" is an outstanding book, winning both the Nebula and Hugo awards within the first
two years of being published. "Ender's Game" makes

Banning Of Book
Should Certain Books Be Banned from the School Library? As a congregation of pupils from
different age groups, the school is responsible for teaching and giving students the right information.
There had been debates about whether specific books should be banned from the school library.
Certain books shouldn't be prohibited from the school library because it has strong legal support
(source 1), book banning censors information (source 2), and students will be tempted to access the
banned information. First, the first amendment and many Supreme Court cases vetoed the banning
of books. The first amendment guaranteed the freedom of the press which includes library books. In
addition, in the many Supreme Court cases such as Case v. Unified School District, Minarcini v.
Strongsville City School District, and Board of Education v. Pico, the judges leaned towards
students, acknowledging ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Movies intrigues and help visualize contents a lot better. Also, according to a research conducted
(source 4), people remember 50% of what they see and hear but only 10% of what they read.
Therefore, some contents can be immature if you watch the movie instead of reading a book and
movies leave bigger imprints in students' mind. Finally, censoring information is not a solution.
People can always find a way through the limitations. Mark Twain once said "telling someone they
can't read a book is like telling a man he can't have a steak because a baby can't chew it." Following
up on the example of the Firewall of China, today, people use VPNs to bypass the filter and access
foreign information. In this case, if students can't read a book, they will be more likely to discover
ways to access the book. In the end, book banning will only increase students' desire to read and
make matters even

Banning A Book Essay
Book Banning and book challenges has been around just as long as books were invented.
Book banning is a way to take away parents rights to decide whether they want their teen to read
that
book or not. A book challenge however is an attempt to restrict or remove a book from other
citizens,
especially teens. A way book challenge works, is when a certain district or person doesn't feel like
the book is appropriate for a certain age group. For reasons like; sexual content, violence, offensive
language and religion. Although people may believe that book banning and challenging books
is for the best, other people may have a different opinion towards that. Challenging a book or
banning it because of a certain individual's opinion

Banning Advertising
I do not believe that advertisements directed toward children should be banned. If we banned this
for of advertisement, then what would be next? Banning advertisements for young adults? Just like
childrens ads, they show celebrities, are easily remembered, and encourage impulse buying.
Arguments could be made that young adults lack the ability to make informed decisions like
children. Its short minded to think that all advertisements for any age group are all bad or harmfull. I
remember watching a childs station when I was younger that ran not only anti–bullying ads, but ads
that also encouraged you to go outside and play. At the end of it all, it's the parents job to restrict or
limit

The Banning Of Fraterrnities
Title: Banning of Fraternities Thesis Statement: Fraternities should not be legalized in universities
because they represent a wrong sense of brotherhood thus leading the students to their own
destruction. Problem: Should we legalize the presence of fraternities in universities? – No.
Introduction: 1.1 Fraternities gave problems since they started violent initiation rites. Main Idea:
Students told: Avoid violent initiation rites 2.1 Malacañang urged students to stop hazing 2.2 "Let's
stop this cycle of violence, no one will benefit from it." – Abigail Valte Main Idea: Fraternities
represent a wrong sense of brotherhood 3.1 Armin Luistro (former DLSU President) said he is
strongly opposed to legalizing fraternities 3.2 Luistro made a clear ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Fraternities are now showing more violence, which is a reason that they should be stopped once and
for all. Violence can be seen anywhere, and most of the starters of a riot or a violent act are members
from fraternities. The police are also observing or patrolling the streets because the attacks from
fraternities can happen anywhere. Fraternities also represent a wrong sense of brotherhood which is
bad for the students that are wanting to join them. Most of the students are not aware of the wrong
doings of fraternities. The students just pay attention to the fact that they will look "cool" when they
join a fraternity. It is bad for the students to join these so–called "brotherhoods" because they don't
know what the members of the fraternities will do to them. It is therefore concluded that fraternities
should be abolished because of the wrong doings they are showing and the wrong sense of
brotherhood they are

The Effects of Book Banning
Banning books is a practice that has been used all throughout history. It affects many people such as
authors, religious groups, students, and other citizens. When books are banned, it limits the amount
a person can read or learn about a certain topic. Banning books is a key component in the novel,
Fahrenheit 451, as well as in society throughout history. The Banning of books has affected the
world greatly. People have been banning books since they first started being written and are still
getting banned today. Under the United States Constitution, people have freedom of speech and of
the press. People argue that the government is violating citizens' rights by banning books. It has
been going on basically forever because governments feel the need to ban some things that are
found in books (Zorea). The reasons for banning books are usually in one of four categories. These
include religious, political, social, and sexual reasons (Dell 11). Books were censored greatly during
World War I, World War II, and the Great Depression. The United States banned any criticism or
opposition to the war or government. Governments and other organizations feared some books
might endanger the country or government (Hanyok). "During a war, battle plans, troop movement
schedules, weapons data, and other information could help the enemy." Because of this, militaries
often censor books and ban any that might help the enemy (Rupp). Many books that are popular
with readers have been banned multiple

Article Analysis : Harper Lee 's ' Kill A Mockingbird '
A lot of books that get banned are due to having real world events, and certain words that are
censoring students from history, and reality. "Harper Lee's book has been challenged by black
parents who object to the use of the word "nigger"." (Rohrer). Although the word is disrespectful to
use, it's a part of history that can't be erased. "To Kill a Mockingbird" uses the word 58 times in the
book, but without it, the book wouldn't have an accurate representation of that time era. The fact that
some religions, origins, and ethnicities get offended by this is understandable, but by trying to ban
the books from schools it is restricting information from the whole student body not only their child.
The history that is being shown by the use of "nigger" only teaches the time era we have lived and
points out how far we have come from. History is what has happened in the past, and what has
shaped us today. The past defines us and is a reminder of where we came from, but also shows us
what we learned from our mistakes. It initially builds our moral values and is memories of time eras
and accomplishments. Parents can't just erase the events that they don't like, otherwise, they aren't
allowing their children to know the truth of what has happened in our past. This takes away
knowledge from students and ultimately makes them naive. Covering the issues of this world with
rainbows and butterflies. When books are censored because of their use of harsh vocabulary or
content that can be

Banning Books
The Reasons to Ban Books
Schools are meant to be a safe environment full of books and learning opportunities. If this is
impaired by books that should be banned, students may feel displaced or uncomfortable. Even a
high schooler is prone to this, if action is not taken. There are hundreds of books full of violence,
explicit language, and drug references. Annenberg Classroom says it is "unsuitable for students"
(AnnenbergClassroom.org). Students of all ages are strongly suggested to not partake of those
things, and reading all about them can cause them to think it is acceptable. It is up to administrators
and parents to decide what should be allowed in school libraries. Everybody has different beliefs,
but most people would not want their ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many school districts do not have "manga"or "anime" banned (Debate.org). This style of literature is
often considered non educational. Books should at least have censorship when profanity or have
sexually explicit content are used. Reading this content as a student is 100% unnecessary. In a study
done in 2000–09 by the American Library Association, about 1,250 books were challenged because
of offensive language. Around 1,600 books were challenged in that same study for being sexually
explicit (Butler.edu). During this, almost all books that were banned were either in school libraries
or schools. A common example of a banned book is Harry Potter by J.Kk. Rowling. This book has a
"presence of witchcraft"'(Butler.edu). In many people's' minds, witchcraft is extremely bad, and
completely unnecessary to discuss those topics. Since many people are against witchcraft, if that
was to be discussed in schools, awful consequences for teacher as well as student could result.
It is understood why somebody may think that books should not be banned at schools because by
doing this parents are hurting their children by restrain their knowledge. When a quality book is
banned, the children lose the opportunity to learn from that book. It is better supported that, some
books should be banned from schools because they can introduce students to unacceptable topics
and teach them bad or useless

Banning Books
Books are a way for people to get away from reality and also learn new information they should not
be banned. Books shouldn't be banned from society; however some do have suggestive content or
profanity. These types of books should be supervised and have an age limit. By banning books it can
eliminate teachings of life lessons for students. Also, going through life without knowing anything
besides rainbows and lollipops can set up students for a rude awakening when they really start to
learn about life. Yes you should try to protect your kids as much as possible; however other kid's
parents might not be doing the same. Your children could be getting mislead information from these
children that know about the bad things in this world. It's best that children are just informed from
the beginning and given facts on the topics ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This would be taking away our rights through the first amendment. However, the first amendment
states that we have the freedom of the press and freedom of speech, not the freedom of reading what
we want. Another reason books would be banned is because of the suggested content. This could
encourage kids to do wrong things. However, people need to remember that many kids know the
difference between right and wrong and also have the ability to make their own decisions.
Next off, books shouldn't be banned because it allows kids and adults to be able to escape reality.
Some kids might now have a great life at home and books can be a way to be able to forget about
the negative things for a while. This can also apply to school; let's take someone that doesn't have
many friends for example. These kids are able to really get into a book and feel as if they are a part
of something bigger than what's going on around them. Another example is literature art, its they
way authors express themselves. When you take that from a writer, it's like taking away their ability
to

Banning Homework
6th grade students need less homework. They need to be active,need time with family, and need a
better social life.
Students need less homework because they need to be active. Students are becoming lazy and are
hating school. Kids are starting to hate school because the school gives too much work known, as
homework. The time it takes to do homework you might as well sit at home and get fat. This is why
kids are fatter by not doing anything. "There is no time to waste with new reports showing that the
physical activity levels of Australian children are among the worst in the world. Instead of slaving
over a computer or books in the few hours of daylight after school, our kids need to be out getting
some exercise. Banning homework will

Book Banning
Think back to when you were in high school, do you remember that one book you read that really
opened your eyes? Well the sad reality is that somewhere in the world that favorite book you read is
either banned or challenged in a library. So it sits locked away never to open the eyes of another or
help educate them further on its contents. Books should not be banned in libraries. We have the
freedom of speech, so why take away or censor our freedom to simply read and consume literature?
There are usually two ludicrous reasons as to why books are banned or challenged, one of them is
that someone gets offended by its contents. I see in many cases that a very religious person gets
outraged by homosexuality in books, and sadly enough that is one of the leading causes of ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Some religions do not like talk of magic or sorcery in fiction books, but that does not mean they
should ruin it for everyone else. The second and most common cause of book banning is a parent
gets upset that their child is reading a book that may contain some more mature scenes. I understand
that some parents may want to protect their children from the more mature content, but by no means
should you ban the book. Someone older and more mature may find this book enlightening! A great
example of this is a parent in Wallingford, Connecticut who filed a complaint against Perks of Being
a Wallflower by Stephen Chbosky and took matters so far to have the book banned. The parent
complained about the book's depiction of homosexuality, sex, and a "glorification of alcohol use and
drugs," according to the local news paper. Perks of being a wallflower is about a boy suffering
heavily from post traumatic stress disorder or PTSD and depression. The book takes readers through
a roller coaster of emotions, but

Banning The Issue Of Banning Cigarettes
In order to preserve life, certain laws and regulations are placed to maintain harmony among people,
to protect against any harmful behavior which might impose preventable diseases and death, and
also to act as an awareness and respect for others. In that regard, what are considered public places
in state laws in reference to smoking is very much debatable. It is our duty as individuals to exercise
certain behaviors that will benefit others, regardless of life circumstances and serve our society in
the most respectable manner, in accordance to people rights and choices.
Since the nineties, there has been a massive controversy on the issue of banning cigarettes in the
U.S. Some claim that banning public smoking is an infringement on their ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Moreover, the correlation to heart diseases and lung cancer from tobacco smoke is illegitimate. Bast
quotes the British Medical Journal, "the results do not support a causal relation between
environmental tobacco smoke and tobacco–related mortality" (Bast). Some are mainly concerned
with those who work in the tobacco and cigarette business. Most families, especially those in Africa,
survive from framing tobacco, which is one of their biggest exports and income. The resultant of
banning public smoking will in the long run deter the economy and lead to unemployment.
According to one study, "the number of pubs closing per week in Britain doubled after a 2007
smoking ban" (Matthews) and the worst scenario is the closure of tobacco companies if the law is
enforced.
However, the law doesn't prohibit people from smoking, but it protects others from the harmful
substances they are exposed to. It's true that the law might be an infringement on freedom, but there
are also laws that ban public drinking to prevent harm that it exerts on others. Thus, banning
smoking in none the less in comparison to those laws. Philosopher, John Stuart stated in 1859, "The
only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized
community, against his will is

Banning Books
Banning books is one of many ways that we are killing children's imagination. Taking books away
from anyone is something that should never happen. When we take books away we are taking away
a safe place for children and we are taking away knowledge of our past. We should be proud to put
different books on a shelf and say that we can have our own opinions. Books should never be
banned from a public library or school because we disagree with what is on the inside of one. No
one should have the right to take away our right to read no matter how high up in the system they
are. We have the right to read books that we want to no matter what content is inside of it. We
should be able to read any genre, fiction, or nonfiction. There is not a single ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Books should be banned because children shouldn't be exposed to the real world until they are older
and they shouldn't be allowed to get this information from a school or public library. Children
shouldn't be exposed to violence, sex, drug use, or other inappropriate topics until they are old
enough to make their own decisions and be safe about them. Young adults shouldn't have to read
about these things while they are in high school and trying to get an education. Children should be
protected from learning too much about all of these things so that they don't get ideas on doing any
of them. We should be protecting our children from the world as long as we can. Young adults and
children's parents have the right to decide what information and topics their children are reading.
They also can have the right to decide what their children should be exposed to and when. Books
should be banned because parents should have the right to say what their children read and when
they read it. Also, they don't know what their children are reading unless they know what is on the
shelves at their child's school. Parents should have the right to challenge book they find
inappropriate for their children to be reading also they have the right to say what their children
should be able to get their hands on in a public or school library. This being said a librarian as a
roadblock is not enough to stop children from reading inappropriate books. Librarians can't always
make sure that children are checking out what their parents would find suitable for their children.
They don't know what the child's parent will accept and what they will find inappropriate. Also, they
don't always know if the child is allowed to read about certain topics because they don't have
specific instructions for each person who comes into the library. Just because we take books out of
libraries doesn't stop people from reading those

Book Banning Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Angilina Jones

More from Angilina Jones (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Book Banning Essay