Nietzsche Quotes

Nietzsche Quotes
"Blessed are the forget, for they get the better even of their blunders." (01:16:01–01:16:39) Howard
replies with, "That's Nietzsche, right?" Although it is Nietzsche, Mary is misinterpreting it, Shaw
writes "This quotation from Nietzsche may seem to contradict the notion of the eternal recurrence,
but in fact he is attempting here to refocus our minds on the future rather than the past." (263) Mary
later tells Dr. Wierwial that he admires the works he does, and while he is mumbling a reply she
catches him off guard and kisses him. Stan watches from outside the car as Dr. Wierzwiak comforts
Mary and spots Dr. Wierwiak's wife, Hollis. Dr. Wieiak and Mary run after Hollis and Mary says
"I'm a stupid girl with a stupid crush! I basically forced ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Clementine is sure that Joel will start seeing things he doesn't like about her and that she'll "get
bored and feel trapped." And Joel just says "Okay." They both laugh nervously realizing that they
have just given the relationship they both tried to erase another chance. Joel's decision to stop the
mind–erasing process shows growth in his character and shows his acceptance of both the good and
bad life has to offer. Joel and Clementine decide to give their relationship another shot, even after
hearing how much do grew to disdain each other. It is questionable if that is brave or dumb. If you
follow Nietzche's concept of eternal recurrence, one could say that perhaps that is not the smartest
idea, however the concept of amor fati shows that you should embrace all that life has to offer. The
film is a departure from many Western romance movies. In the end we are not sure of Joel and
Clementine's future, and they don't get a typical happy ending such as a wedding. The film shows
that love is much more complex than what films portray, not everything is perfect all the time. The
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind clearly demonstrates the Nietzchean concepts of eternal
recurrence and amor fati. The two lovers in the film finally achieve amor fati by taking a chance on
their
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Fascism, Nietzsche, Power
Fascism, Nietzsche, Power
Nietzsche's writing about power dynamics and the creation of the "strong" and "weak," the "good"
and the "bad," is very closely intertwined with the workings of fascist ideology, and how it
understands itself to be "strong." In a Nietzschean sense, however, fascism ultimately fails to be
truly "strong" because it creates itself as a reformed moralistic approach to power, rather than
freeing itself from moralism. More specifically, the construction of the Jews as "weak" by those who
subscribe to fascist ideology, and the portrayal of themselves as "strong,"is almost wholly
antithetical Nietzsche's actual position concerning power dynamics. Instead, as Nietzsche lays out in
The Genealogy of Morals, real power is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Nietzsche explains this struggle as a "slave morality," which can only survive if it has a force that
acts against it so its existence is justified; the role of opposition to the slave morality is occupied by
the "strong." He writes "In order to exist at all, slave morality from the outset always needs an
opposing, outer world; in physiological terms, it needs external stimuli in order to act–its action is
fundamentally reaction" (Genealogy of Morals 22). The morality of the strong is precisely the
antithesis of this: it justifies itself by reaffirming the strength of itself – they justify their behaviors
by reaffirming their own lives, not by placing their lives in juxtaposition with the lives of the weak.
Nietzsche expands this, saying "The opposite is the case with the aristocratic mode of evaluation:
this acts and grows spontaneously, it only seeks out its antithesis in order to affirm itself more
thankfully and more joyfully" (Genealogy 22).
What fascists fail to recognize, however, is that fascism does not transcend the need to fight an
opposing force – it does not exist without some "external stimuli" to which the fascists are always
responding. The Jews are constructed as the epitome of this "slave morality"; they are the weak
people subjected by the aristocratically "strong" fascists. But, fascism moralizes in exactly the same
way as the Jews do for Nietzsche;

Nietzsche on Slave Morality Essay
"Nietzsche on Judeo–Christian Morality" In Nietzsche's aphorisms 90–95 and 146–162 he attacks
what he believes to be the fundamental basis of the "slave" morality prevalent in the Judeo–
Christian tradition as well as other religions and societies. From the beginning, he distinguishes the
two different types of moralities he believes to exist: the "master morality", created by rulers of
societies, and the "slave" morality, created by the lowest people in societies. The former stresses
virtues of the strong and noble while looking down upon the weak and cowardly. This type of
morality, however, is not as widespread as the "slave morality" that has been adopted by so many
religions. Nietzsche looks through the psychology and logic of ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Is this "slave morality" really a divine gift from God, or is it just the moral code we expect to come
from a historically persecuted lower people? This brings up a big question over the validity of "slave
morality", as it seems to only exist for protection of the lower people, not for what's truly good and
evil. Also, as Nietzsche brings up, its validity comes from the existence of a God who gave us these
morals, something that cannot be proven, so naturally the concept of "faith" and trusting and
believing in these morals and the God who created them would be a prime virtue, and those without
it viewed as "evil" or "lost". Nietzsche also brings up a good point in that this morality that comes
from historically persecuted people serves to "tame" men and call it an "improvement", which he
sees as a bad joke. He believes that this taming reduces our instinctive "beast" and makes us weaker
creatures. He questions if we have really grown more "moral" over time or if it is just the result of
mankind becoming, frankly, bigger "wusses". This made me think of movies like Fight Club and
Deliverance in that in both movies men seem to be so tame and it is shown to be against our nature.
Fight Club in particular focuses on this release of beastliness and return to what is believed to be the
way mankind was intended to live. The last critique Nietzsche makes is also one of

Nietzsche and Gandhi, Society
Friedrich Nietzsche and Mahatma Gandhi, two mammoth political figures of their time, attack the
current trend of society. Their individual philosophies and concepts suggest a fundamental problem:
if civilization is so diseased, can we overcome this state of society and the sickness that plagues the
minds of the masses in order to advance? Gandhi and Nietzsche attain to answer the same
proposition of sickness within civilization, and although the topic of unrest among both may be
dissimilar, they have parallel means of finding a cure to such an illness as the one that plagues
society. Nietzsche's vision of spiritual health correlates directly with Gandhi's image of industrialism
and the self–sufficiency. This correlation prevails by ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This situation exemplifies everything that Gandhi was attempting to convey about the over
indulgence of man as aided by doctors. Because of the doctoral profession, Nietzsche states, "my
body... felt more at ease; but my mind became weakened" (Nietzsche 33). By weakening the minds
of the public, doctors are directly contributing to the sickness of civilization. Nietzsche reveals slave
and master morality as a paramount concept, conveying the power of the wealthy and prominent
over the poor and downtrodden. Nietzsche states that "In order to exist, slave morality always first
needs a hostile external world; it needs... external stimuli in order to act at all– its action is
fundamentally reaction" (Nietzsche 37). The weak, passive, cowardly, and sick are reacting to the
overbearing nature of the nobility. The lower, sickened class is insecure and unable to act because
they know that they are weak. They have the fundamental drive in the universe, the will to power,
yet they are unable to act, rather they can merely react to the harsh and unjust situations that
external world is placing on them. They harbor a ressentiment towards the elite The cure of such a
sickness in civilization would not come easily. Nietzsche's treatment would be to capitalize on the
will to power. Every person is driven by a force to overcome their oppression, and find the
"happiness in "slight superiority," involved

What Is Nietzsche On Will To Power
Inspired by Arthur Schopenhauer's idea the "will to live" and a desire to rebut Christianity's
promotion of morality, Friedrich Nietzsche coined the term "will to power" as the accurate
description of man's driving force. Within Nietzsche's perspective, "Values did man only assign to
things in order to maintain himself – he created only the significance of things, a human
significance!" (Thus Spoke Zarathustra 51). This therefore implies that humanity developed values
as a means of self–preservation. However, as civilized society further isolates man from the perils of
nature, thus limiting the threats to self–preservation, Nietzsche asserts the higher motivation of "... a
living thing wants to discharge its strength – life itself is will to power –: self–preservation is only
one of the indirect and most frequent consequences of this." (Beyond Good and Evil 15). ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In addition, the assertion that man can only find meaning within life by "...discharging its
strength..." (15), which though vague, serves as the crux of Nietzsche's philosophical outlook on the
world. For example, Nietzsche criticizes the acceptance of ambiguity by his contemporaries in that
"There was a type of enjoyment in overpowering and interpreting the world in the manner of
Plato..." (Beyond Good and Evil 15–16); Plato's philosophy, though proven incorrect, theorizes an
encompassing philosophy that explained the totality of life and the world. The process of
understanding the world, though futile, acts as a means of gaining power over the world within
Nietzsche's philosophy. By accepting ambiguity, Nietzsche claims that his contemporaries were
forgoing an opportunity to express their

Nietzsche And The Birth Of Tragedy
Austin Tierney Thompson 4970 05–06–2018 Nietzsche and The Birth of Tragedy To argue that
Birth of Tragedy has a central claim; "theory is created at the expense of art", is to attempt to reduce
its offerings to an oversimplification of a single thematic component. A central claim is the result of
a complete and settled debate within defined parameters. This is true even if this settlement;
subsequently, proves merely temporary. To be central is to exist at a single point between the outer
parameters of phenomena which must be known or at least defined and agreed upon. There is no
single central claim that could conceivably be presented as a reference point offering access to
anything like a comprehensive insight to all that this work contains. That " theory is created at the
expense of art " is certainly a discernible assertion made by Nietzsche. That said there are a myriad
of other premises and claims within Birth of Tragedy that cannot simply be ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
How then might we progress in arriving at the "kernel of this strange and inaccessible book" by this
"brooding lover of puzzles" ? One possible mode of discernment is offered by the author himself via
a comment he makes on another great work on which so many have differing views and approaches;
Hamlet:We find the same thing in Shakespeare, whose Hamlet, for example likewise speaks more
superficially than he acts, so the lesson of Hamlet, which we have already mentioned, is to be found
not in the words themselves but in a profound contemplation and survey of the play as a whole"To
gain access to Birth of Tragedy, to define its claims and to locate their relationship we must not, of
course, ignore the actual text but we certainly need to be mindful of more than that which is simply
being said and to be willing to consider and take in to account; the intent of the author in publishing
this work, the discernable premises and meanings inherent in its

Essay on Nietzsche
Nietzsche
I think that the three questions that I will try to find answers are highly interconnected with each
other and because of this reason, I will not answer them separately. I will be answering them
without order.
First of all, from my interpretation of Nietzsche, modern humanity did not invent the idea of God.
Rather the God had a functional role from his point of view. There is no doubt that, modern
humanity had the idea of God, but in my opinion, this idea was like a heritage to the modern
humanity from their ancestors. We should look at the earlier times of the history in order to
understand the roots of the invention of God.
At this point, I agree with Magnus' opinion, as he asserts that at the early moments of the ... Show
"Will to power" in Nietzsche can be seen as a natural disposition. But now the critical point comes,
because the human beings misinterpreted the "Will to power", it became a part the bad conscience.
Human beings needed internal comfort or let us say peace of mind. So what was vital to achieve
this? They needed to legitimize their brutal and illogical practices and experiences. So, after all we
see that people invented the idea of God to do that. As people felt more and more indebt ness to
their ancestors and also achieve more and more superiorities, they victimized new borne beings. So
bad conscience was some sort of an interconnection between the ancestors and the following
generations.
As I said earlier, the ancestors began to represent God. So from my point of view, it was the will to
power and also the legitimizing the violence of people behind the invention of the God. I can give
many examples at this point. For example in the second essay of "Genealogy of Morals", it is said
that Trojan War was a part of the God's Festival. I think that people legitimized the war by creating
God. Also they used the God motive behind the reason of war. Also apart from Nietzsche, I want to
give another example. When we look at the Holy Wars, we observe that the main effective motive
seems to be the religious reasons, but I do not think that it is the case. It was the objective of
conquering and maintaining power in those regions both politically and

Nihilism According To Nietzsche
The nihilism analysis has been prevalent position over the past few years. Its anticipated purpose is
to demand questions about the norms made in a philosophical debate. These contain the notion that
one must actually suggest and preserve an idea in order to contextualize one's idea.
Tacitly, this philosophy, nihilism, seems new to most people and to philosophy as a whole.
Especially from a Western standpoint. But Nietzsche conducts an unapologetic attack on what
society has deemed as conformist morality. And at the end of the 19th Century (when he died) this
could have struck many as more progressive rather than conservative. Many during that time,
however, saw it as pure sacrilege. The entrenched on both sides have made it difficult ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
As a communications major, the focus should not be on the words themselves, but rather on the
more in–depth meaning of those words. Zarathustra says the coined phrase and follows up with,
"We have killed Him." In laymen's terms, the scientific certainty has made God archaic and
outdated. But really, there is an underlayment here. The underlying idea that it is not just God (this
supernatural icon in the sky) that is dead, but rather the idea that many of the absolutes that we
discussed previously have died. One specifically being morality. These outmoded morals cannot
direct the humans in a more intricate world/society. There are many discussions that have been had
about this phrase and what it could mean, but the most significant is that the value itself is
prospectively weak. Humans have transformed into this complicated being, and constrained by this
badness of morals. There is one woman who would argue in a Newsweek article that Nietzsche
through objective morality. Karen Armstrong of Newsweek states in the article History of God that
"...Nietzsche was right to say that human beings killed God. Even fundamentalists (whose faith is
essentially modern and innovative) bear to the fact that men and women can no longer be religious
in the same way as their ancestors. In the postmodern world, it was generally understood that while
reason was indispensable for mathematics, science, or politics. It could, not by itself give human
beings access to the divine. But the extraordinary success of scientific rationalism in the modern
world has made reason the only path to truth. We assume that God is an objective fact, like the
atom, whose existence can be proved empirically. When we find the demonstration unconvincing,
we lose faith. Our neglect of the esthetic of prayer, liturgy, and mythology has indeed killed our
sense of the divine." 1 Nietzsche labels this as a bit of

Nietzsche Good And Evil
In the first essay of On The Genealogy of Morals, Nietzsche states clearly his stand that "Beyond
Good and Evil... does not mean "Beyond Good and Bad"" (Nietzsche, page 143). Nietzsche makes
the distinction between good/bad, and good/evil, by delineating the central idea that what is good
and evil generally carries a morality to its definitions, whereas the former is essentially a social
construct with slanted purposes and no true objectivity to its meanings. Nietzsche frames the idea
that the values of good and bad, are fundamental to how we involve morality in our thinking,
namely, how we assess what is good and what is evil.
Nietzsche introduces the initial concepts of what is good to be determined by those who have
benefitted from unegoistical ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It does not find its root and origin in objective circumstances; it originates from a place of
suppression, of seeking freedom, and most significantly, of ressentiment. Herein the idea Nietzsche
proposes is that the slaves are responsive against their noble masters because they are weak and
impotent, leading to the festering of hatred and resentment. This means that values culminating from
the revolt would be inaccurate in representing the true meaning of "good" or "evil", because they
were formed through the tainted lens of the slaves of ressentiment. They would portray the slaves,
the weak, and the powerless as "good" and favourable, while casting the nobles, the masters, and the
upperclassmen in an "evil" and malicious light. This inverts the original notion that the nobles are
the definition of "good". Nietzsche expounds this situation by clarifying that the nobles become
"blond beast[s]" (Nietzsche, page 128) when out of their familiar circumstances, insinuating that
they turn into a barbaric state where they seek victory over those who are inferior to them. In turn,
displays of brutality will be expressed, as a by–product of this barbarism and therefore, fulfilling the
morality of the nobles as "evil". Nietzsche also expresses that this form of morality may not always
be beneficial; it cages the

Nietzsche Nihilism
The 1859 publication of Darwin's On the Origin of Species had dramatic consequences, among
them the creation of doubt about God's place in a world where species independently evolve and
continually change. Darwin had not merely questioned God; he had shaken one of the core Christian
beliefs: that God had created a flawless and unchanging earth. When Darwin's ideas were not
scientifically disproven, the basis of Christianity itself was called into question. That questioning
continued as scientific discovery advanced. The traditional view and place of God became less and
less applicable to modern life, triggering an onset of nihilism in many as the foundations of their
lives were chipped away by scientific progress. Scholars and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Gooding–Williams identifies two essential reasons for this "desertifying" effect of Christian–
Platonic values on life. First, "they identify as wrong or sinful" certain aspects of human life that
Nietzsche thinks are vital (34). For example, this vaue system discourages willing and value–
creation by claiming all authority in those areas. As a result, these instincts are repressed in humans,
who "would rather will nothingness than not will," finally resulting in a denial of life, which is seen
as unhealthy by Nietzsche (Nietzsche, On the Geneaology of Morals 163). Second, they "favor ...
the universal rule of one and only one value scheme," blocking efforts by individuals to exercise
their natural wills to power by creating their own values (Gooding–Williams 35).
Out in that desert, the camel sheds his load, and becomes the lion spirit. Unlike the obedient, load–
bearing camel, the lion asserts his own will and "lordship in its own wilderness" (Nietzsche, Thus
Spake Zarathustra). In order to truly become his own master as he desires, the lion must triumph
over the dragon, representative of the God and value system he is deserting, which claims that "[a]ll
values have already been created, and all created values – do I represent" (Nietzsche, Thus Spake
Zarathustra). Since both lion and dragon claim sole authority over the creation and valuation of all
possible values, one must defeat the other:

Comparing Nietzsche And Rand
Nietzsche and rand both have some interesting way of viewing life. Nietzsche believed that humans
should live life as they want and there should be no rules on how to live. He also believes that truth
is a perception, and it is something that could only be achieved by someone who neglects everything
known to be significant. It is also similar to Ayn Rand's idea.
In my opinion, some of the essential idea in Nietzsche's "beyond good and evil" is his search for the
truth. He believed everyone had the ability to explore truth in their own specific way. In Nietzsche's
"beyond good and evil" he also believes that self – preservation is not the main ambition of human
beings but the fundamental creative force that motivates all creations is the "will to power"(122).
Furthermore, Friedrich Nietzsche did not believe in the existence of God, to him, God was dead.
God plays no vital role in our culture– except as a protector of the slaves morality, including the
idea of equal worth of all persons (122).
Ayn Rand, "In Defense of Ethical Egoism," suggests individuals needs to be selfish, she further
explains that limiting or humbling oneself for the sake of morality is wrong. "A morality that dares
to tell you to find happiness in the reunification of your happiness – to value the failure of your
values –is an ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Similarly, they both agreed on the same idea of sense of life. However, they had different opinion on
slavery. Ayn Rand was against slavery, she emphasized that men should be free, she believed
freedom made man's mind at ease. Though Friedrich Nietzsche was for the notion that higher
authority, (master) can attain success even at the cost using another individual

Essay about Nietzsche and the Prophet
Nietzsche and the Prophet
According to Friedrich Nietzsche's Thus Spoke Zarathustra, the meaning of human existence is to
make room for the "Superman": a superhuman who perseveres in its capacity for unlimited self–
creation. (Pg. 49)[1] In order for humankind to embrace its self–creative nature and allow for the
transcendence into this superhuman condition, however, we must first learn to destroy our present
tables of values; it is our desperate adherence to traditional (religious) values which prevents us
from actualizing our potential for self–creation. It is important to note, however, that it is not the
creation of these traditional values in and of itself that Nietzsche condemns. After all, self–creation
is not only a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
So, in spite of the immanent desire to be rid of the past, Nietzsche's protagonist, Zarathustra, finds
himself unable to completely sever himself from it. Hence Zarathustra's struggle to affirm his past
while pursuing a self–creating future.
The aim of this paper is threefold. First, I will provide evidence for the interpretation of The Prophet
as an elucidation of the struggle of Nietzsche's protagonist to reconcile this inalienable relationship
between the past and the future. In doing so, I will focus on three main facets of the passage,
namely, the prophet, Zarathustra's dream and, the misinterpretation of the dream by the disciple.
Second, I will demonstrate how The Prophet can simultaneously be interpreted so as to advance
Nietzsche's own view of human nature as self–creativity. Third, I will explicate what ramifications
my interpretations of The Prophet has on the relationship between Nietzsche and his reader.
The Inalienable Relationship Between the Past and the Future
The Prophet begins with Zarathustra being told that "Everything is empty, everything is one,
everything is past!". (Pg. 155) That is, the prophet informs Zarathustra that the present–day way of
life has become tired and saturated; there is no more advancement to be made in the absence of a
rudimentary transformation of humankind. In short, the time has come for the self–destruction and
re–creation of humankind; the time has come for humankind

Nietzsche Slave Morality
This paper will discuss a major theme within Nietzsche's writing, apply Nietzsche's ideas to a
contemporary issue, and I will give my own position on Nietzsche's writing.
Nietzsche believed in two types of morality, slave and master. Nietzsche believed that those who
have a slave morality are motivated by their bitter indignation of having been treated unfairly. The
core motivator for those with slave morality is resentment. Slave morality is born out of resentment
of the powerful. The man of resentment has a strong passion of hate. Fundamentally, slave morality
develops out of the resentment by the weak in the face of the powerful. As Nietzsche writes
"Ressentiment itself becomes creative and gives birth to values." It is the powerful that ... Show
Romans did not have equality, liberty, rights or freedoms for all of its citizens. Instead, many
peoples within the Roman Empire were commonly persecuted, made slaves, or unequal. In Rome
you were either a free citizen, or a feeble slave. Nietzsche had a strong passion and interest in
Roman and Ancient Greek culture. Nietzsche believed that the Roman Empire and ancient Greeks
represented the apex of all western civilization. Ancient Rome and Greece had a system of ethics
grounded in the master morality. According to Nietzsche, once the Roman and Greek empires
collapsed slave morality rooted in a Christian code of ethics dominated. The new slave morality, in
Nietzsche's view, was created by the weak in order to defend against the powerful. Today Europe is
known for its strong social systems. However, Nietzsche would be strongly opposed to the modern
European system. Nietzsche thinks that the achievement of principles such as democracy, equality,
and justice is a great catastrophe for the totality of mankind. The slave morality that has engulfed
Europe is exactly the opposite of what human's truly value. Instead, Nietzsche would believe that
we are experiencing an unhealthy Christian morality, which consequently results in people turning a
blind eye to their natural inclinations. The current morality in Europe is representative of the fact
that mediocre groups are valued over the superior individual. Those who do not comply and instead
express a will to power are either brainwashed or persecuted. Furthermore, suffering and hardship
are essential for success in Nietzsche's mind. However, Western civilization encourages slave
morality and mediocracy, which cannot possibly allow individuals to succeed. Hardship and
suffering has become very limited in the modern world. For Nietzsche, limiting suffering and
hardships means that society will not

Nietzsche 's Morals
In 1887, philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche had written a collection of essays entitled The Genealogy
of Morals. Nietzsche ideas was an inscribed assessment based upon ethical principles. Nietzsche
analyzes the connections and significance of the contrasting moral concepts in a distinctive section
where he elaborates on the "good and the bad" as well as the "good and evil", by expressing his
thoughts on slave morality that was created by the Jews.
In the beginning, Nietzsche states that the priest is worthless and that they learn to hate. The priest
hatred is powerful that it causes them to be destructive and it is known throughout history. Nietzsche
compares the Jews to the priest caste who were the most hated in human history. The Jews somehow
managed to reverse the moral assessments associating themselves as good but, the powerful nobles
will be known as "evil" and damned for eternity. However, Nietzsche said, "It was the Jews who
started the slave revolt in morals" (445)
In the following section, Nietzsche explains that the reassessment of values effected by the Jews
was occurring and that they were not noticeable. One of their achievements was the development of
the religious teachings Christianity. He states that the Christian love violated the Jewish hatred and
that the representation of Jesus and his crucifixion was the persuasion of the moral code. The
embodiment and crucifixion of Jesus showed that annulment of the moral code, was once "good"
became "evil" and what

Kierkegaard And Nietzsche
Soren Kierkegaard was a Danish philosopher/existentialist born in Copenhagen, Denmark.
Commonly known as the "father of existentialism", his works included strong subjects such as
seeing the human existence as fallen, and that human life is lived in suffering and sin, guilt, and
anxiety. Kierkegaard's work is mostly revolved around religion, specifically Christianity based.
Coming from a line of Lutheran pastors, shows how major of an influence religion is on his work.
On the contrary, Friedrich Nietzsche, a German philosopher/existentialist, was different from
Kierkegaard with a more atheist background. Nietzsche's writing came from somewhere non–
religious, even though he came from a long line of pastors as well. Nietzsche's writings ... Show
As mentioned earlier, Nietzsche doesn't recognize a high power, which is odd because he grew up
among Lutheran pastors. Philosophy of the future influenced Nietzsche's philosophy. He believed in
the after of certain periods. For example, he was post moral, post religious, post metaphysical etc.
He also was the type of existentialism philosopher that was about reevaluating values, basically
giving a new sense of good and bad and to be multi–perspectival. However, in Nietzsche's eyes
decision making wouldn't be a burden like it would be seen in Kierkegaard's eyes. Nietzsche would
see as a great process for people to have control over their own lives. Because he believed in that
you should enhance the quality of life and become a work of art would support that having that free
will, will let humanity become, enhance, and create the life they want for themselves. Nietzsche's
outlook about shows that the central idea to his philosophy is the idea of "life–affirmation," which
involves an honest questioning of all doctrines that drain life's expansive energies, however socially
prevalent those views might be. (Wicks 1). With Nietzsche's outlook, would intrigue modern people
today, to proclaim their own lives and make their own decisions. Also, being constructive, being
creative, and reinterpreting everything was a part of the Nietzsche's philosophy and those three

Pascal And Nietzsche Comparison
Both Pascal and Nietzsche believe there are several endorsements one should take to to make our
lives significance before our time comes to leave the universe. Pascal and Nietzsche may have some
similarities passed on their philosophical publications, yet also differences. Nietzsche promotes that
there is a universe, which it is unchanged after men live and eventually die out. With this being said
Nietzsche contributes with that ideal and expounds the concept of "Truth "and "Lies", while Pascal
justifies that man without God is unhappy, miserable, and lost but most importantly that nature is
sin. Starting off with Nietzsche, we live a life with morals and non–moral (immoral). Moral contains
good values while immoral is bad or evil that are based on your instincts. "Then, during the moral
epoch of humanity, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When it comes to instincts, Nietzsche claims with in moral values come with truth and lies
Nietzsche mentions, "What is more, human beings allow themselves to be lied to to in dreams every
night of their lives, without their moral sense ever seeking to prevent this happening, whereas it is
said that some people have even eliminated snoring by will–power." (Nietzsche, pg.142) Nietzsche
claims that there will be times in which we will be lied to, yet if something is not visible doesn't
necessarily mean is true. Taken the example the existence of God, one doesn't see or hear God yet
we believe he exists, however, if something exist it has some meaning to it. This brings the
statement of if God exists then stuff matters, and if nothing matters then therefor God doesn't exist.
With saying this that that means God is a lie and this relates in which your beliefs or morals
supports it. Another factor we interpret of Nietzsche's notion of the formation of concepts. As
Nietzsche mentions "...clever animals invented cognition" (Nietzsche, pg.141) Speaking of "clever
animals"

Nietzsche Genealogy Of Morals
What are morals? Are they a certain thing that have to be done or a thing that is learned? Are they
going to be something that we use in good or bad times? According to the dictionary morals is
defined as relating to, or concerned with the principles or rules of right conduct or the distinction
between right and wrong. Simply this means that your right of conduct is ethical. It is also stated
that morals are founded on the fundamental principles of right conduct rather than legalities or
custom. So what is Nietzsche: Genealogy of Morals going to tell us about these morals that will
show us that what we do is more about those humanly principles rather than legal principle?
Nietzsche: Genealogy of Morals is consisted of 3 essays about morals. I will be talking and
summarizing the first essay that he wrote for the Genealogy of Morals. Nietzsche expresses his
dissatisfaction with certain English psychologists. He 's not too happy with them because they try to
explain the origin or morality and claim to be historians of such but they do not have the historical
spirit. He states that their theories are suggestive to the fact people use to benefit from unegoistic
actions of others. These same genealogists suggest that we have gone away from this type of
morality and truly forgot all about ourselves. As the readings continue it is determined that
Nietzsche does not agree with this because those who say goodness was shown could not and did
not define good. People only see

Comparison Between Nietzsche And Kierkegaard
Nietzsche and Kierkegaard are both considered to be the top existentialists for solely different
reasons, as well as being very different from each other. They have different philosophies when it
comes to their thoughts on religion and it is important to see exactly how they line up in this regard.
The best way to do this is to start from the beginning of each's work, their history and how they
grew into their respective roles in their fields. It is also important to note exactly what existentialism
is. It is the theory of exercising the idea that the individual has the freedom and free will to develop
their own path and existence in a responsible manner. It is a very interesting subject that is debated
on the concepts of thinking in absolutes. The need to compare and contrast these two is a volatile
understanding of this particular philosophical theory. It is also important to review their thoughts
and critique them in the sense of saying what makes sense, and what does not make sense. Starting
with Kierkegaard, it is best to understand that he has a deep fulfillment to God and that he feels is
the absolute. This absolute is to live in the realm of a paradox and that paradox is proving the
existence of God and experiencing it for yourself. To understand this is to go through the different
stages, of aesthetic, moral and religious. The aesthetic is all about the individual and focuses on
oneself as an individual. The moral is having to be antagonistic towards yourself in

Nietzsche Slave Morality
The slave mortality presented by Nietzsche in his Genealogy of Morals is prevalent within modern
literature. The dark effects of this morality have crept far beyond the general view of the elite class
and into our writing. This is not much of a surprise since literature reflects the world and our view
of the world within it. Unfortunately, its impact on our society is shown by its prevalence within
modern writing. This morality allows the author to focus on the "evil enemy" (Nietzsche 39) instead
of the good within humanity. This obsession with the negativity within the world has become a
theme within humanities writing. Every good story must have some conflict some evil that is tearing
at the good and often innocent. And it is true, that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The standard of living is the highest it has ever been, the rate at which new technologies are being
produced is truly amazing. The problem with the slave morality is not its existence but its
prevalence. This is where Nietzsche observations have some reality. It is true that the slave
mentality is widespread and that thousands of years have made it hard to look past such a mentality
but Nietzsche argument that it started with the jews is questionable at best. The mythology that
comes long before the influence of Judeo–Christian influence spread throughout the western world
and it always has monsters or evil royalty that must be destroyed. The hero is good because they are
not monsters and because they remove the monsters. The monsters are just like the birds of prey the
truth is that entirety of the human race was a lamb. That mentality allowed us to survive the
treacherous world and eventually change it to fit our purpose. In order to achieve this humankind
has to take as much as they could that way our frail bodies could survive. This take still has a place
in the culture that we face today and in a lot of ways it has no place.
Both of the plays The Good Woman of Setzuan by Bertolt Brecht and Trifles by Susan Glaspell
depict worlds that are full of evil. In Trifles, a woman murders her husband and two of her friends
justify it by using the slave 's morality. He took away her

Nietzsche Chapter 17
Jonathan Liddle
Chapter 17 Essay Friedrich Nietzsche begins with a proposition that there are only two basic types
of morality Slave morality and Master Morality. These types of moralities that Nietzsche proposes
were initially formed when society was actually made up of masters and slaves. In society masters
were completely free and slaves simply did whatever their masters said. Based on their respected
situations Nietzsche argues these groups of people came up with two very different types of
morality. Of course there are no longer any literal masters and slaves in todays society, however
Nietzsche proposes while master and slaves no longer exist, the moral systems they came up with
do. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
If you're a slave then your entire life is dominated by your master, everything you do is for him/her.
Clearly in this position as a slave, you will come to resent your master, in fact you will come to
resent your master so much that you will begin to think of your master as evil and everything that
she values is equally evil. Moral evil enters the picture in slave morality as a form of resentment for
the master and everything the master values things like courage, pride, nobility and bravery. So if
slave morality gets off the ground by thinking about the evil master, then where does goodness
come into the picture for slave morality? The slave will think about it like this, evil is the opposite
of goodness, I am the opposite of the master and the master is evil. Therefore, it must be good to be
a slave. Moral goodness in other words means being a good slave. For instance, a good slave is
humble, never draws attention to himself, so it must be morally good to be humble. A good slave is
also blindly obedient. Does whatever he is told without questioning. Therefore, blind obedience
must be a good

Nietzsche On The Genealogy Of Morality
Friedrich Nietzsche, an extremely controversial thinker of his time, was an "outspoken critic of
German nationalism, anti–Semitism, and religious dogmatism" (Kellner). Indubitably, Nietzsche has
had a great impact on the improvement of twentieth century social thought. Key ideas from
Nietzsche are included in the following: The Gay Science, On the Genealogy of Morality and
Beyond Good and Evil. In the Gay Science, Nietzsche presents the famous image of the madman
declaring "God is dead... and we have killed him". Much of Nietzsche's work problematizes
Christianity and urges humanity to rethink the basis of morality. The artful self–stylization that may
be implied by this is also suggested, and how to live without religious certainty. After the loss of
religion as a guide and path to follow in his time, Nietzsche acknowledged the need for direction
and understood that this could be possible by creating certain values for society to accept and
follow. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Nietzsche spoke of people that fell short of such originality as 'herd animals', "moderns... [who]
possess nothing which is truly ours" (Nietzsche, 1886). In addition, he critiqued modernity for
inhibiting the creation of liberated, more contented, and individuals of good health. Referring to the
modern culture as "barbaric" (Nietzsche, 1887), he suggested that a higher form of culture could be
obtained through free spirited individuality and the process of self–overcoming. Nietzsche proposed
that we are the "creature and creator" of ourselves. In order to attain this higher form of culture and
individuality, the creature with brutality instincts within us must be conquered. We must self–
examine and assess ourselves in order to become improved

Nietzsche: Slave Morality
Nicole Rosenthal Nietzsche–Rewrite 12/12/15
When reading Nietzsche, we can pick up from him that he was very educated and often picked apart
philosophers opinions. Although he had a very poor outlook on his culture and everyday society, he
had very strong opinions when it came to humans and their actions. He made strong assumptions
whether people agreed with him or not. One of Nietzsche's main goal during the Geology of Morals,
is to show the difference between slave and master morality. What caused the master morality to
have hate for the slave morality and how did it affect a person. Nietzsche begins to talk about
humans and master morality. As defined by Nietzsche, master morality is thought to be in relevant
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Thought the Geology of Morals, we find many different forms of guilt. For some modern day
citizens, it is considered the feeling you get when you know you have done something wrong, and
you can feel regretful. When beginning to talk about promises, Nietzsche says, "...one had given
ones promise so as to participate in the advantages of society– and it was indeed with the aid of this
kind memory that one at last came "to reason"!" (498) We pick up from the reading that keeping
promises is a responsibility in society and should always be taken seriously. It is to be considered
childish and disrespectful to society. Promises also give reason to believe that we can become
predictable. Becoming predictable can fall under someone's reputation whether it be positive or
negative. Those who can make promises are viewed highly and believed he can be in charge of his
own future. Thus promises can also contribute to guilt or our conscious. Some may consider
breaking a promise can make them feel guilty. Nietzsche also states that later on it could cause
future consequences. Others may feel nothing at all. Others may not be bothered by the thought of
that. Nietzsche begins to talk further into guilt and debt. When someone fails to keep a promise they
can become guilty, but can also full under debt. When someone fell under debt, they either paid it
off over time or with punishment, which was often a way of paying back

Plato Vs Nietzsche
It is easy to note that Plato and Nietzsche have very different views from each other. They are
philosophers from different decades, with different backgrounds, and have different morals which
creates two polar perspectives on life. While Plato is considered a founding philosopher, Nietzsche
is a more contemporary philosopher who encouraged radical ideas.
Plato lived in Greece, during period when it was going through major changes and incorporating
new cultural ideals to blend with its own. Greece experienced new advances in art, music,
architecture, and philosophy. With new advances came the questioning of old traditions in Greece.
During this time Plato came up with his own philosophy guided by the teachings of Socrates and his
own life experiences. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One thing they have in common is discontent for democracy. They believe that there are those who
should assume authority over others. Also, the topics in their works cover some of the same ideas
such as love, the body, and the idea of the soul. When it comes to the soul Nietzsche says, "Ten
times a day you must overcome yourself: that makes you good and tired and is opium for the soul."
On the other hand Plato states, "For he makes his homes in the characters, in the souls, of gods of
men – and not even every soul that comes along: when he encounters a soul with a harsh character,
he turns away; but when he finds a soft and gentle character, he settles down into it." Both men
acknowledge the existence of the soul and that finding one that is pure a high regard. They also both
believe that in order to make your soul pure you must overcome challenges and struggles in your
life. Another similarity between Plato and Nietzsche is that they view the principle of truth in an
ethical manner. There is truth in the judgements of people to guide us to experience better health and
life. They both also feel there is tension behind the human endeavor to find truth. There is a constant
strife and questioning of nature that leads to the outcome of the good life. They both believe in the
idea of pain and pleasure existing together and creates an ultimate experience for human existence.
Nietzsche and Plato also have some differences in their thinking. It is important to note that Plato's
philosophical contributions influenced Western philosophy and Nietzsche was a hard critic of
Western philosophy ideals. Plato believes that death was the ultimate freedom of a life that made
sense and death was ultimately a way for us to learn about the truth of nonsensical principles of life.
Plato emphasizes life of being simple and reaching enlightenment in an

Nietzsche Research Paper
Short Paper 4 Friedrich Nietzsche
Son of a preacher, Friedrich Nietzsche was a deeply spiritual atheist who lived a cold life of
continual struggle. Nietzsche is known as the anti–philosopher because he provoked controversy. He
had an enormous influence on twentieth century contemporary thought. He made a name for himself
as someone who is not scared to speak his mind, He introduced concepts such as The Will to Power,
Overman, Master Morality and Slave Morality. Which are thought provoking important concepts to
know.
Friedrich Nietzsche`s hard life and philosophy led him to concluded that life itself is an irrational,
and pointless existence. Nietzsche insisted that life is governed by the "Will to Power", which he
defined as a universal desire ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Nietzsche is saying that there are only 3 types of people and that they are clearly defined. I think
that's too raw; it's like saying that either you love America, or you hate it, a false dichotomy. In
reality it`s possible to hate one specific part, for example the fact that America does not use the
metric system but still love it as a whole. I also think that there are far more "last mans" in this
world than "overmen". A good example of a last man is not hard to conceive. For example, a
powerful billionaire that's concerned with power and lives for comfort and pleasure. Although he
can easily improve the world, he chooses to use technological advancements only when it's in his
benefit. He will strive to neglect technology of knowledge that improves the lives of the world but
negatively effects their wealth. An overman is harder to come by, but maybe someday we will find

Kierkegaard And Nietzsche And Existentialism
Existentialism can be defined as a branch of philosophy that emphasizes individual existence,
freedom, and choice. It focuses on the question of human existence and the feeling that there is no
purpose or explanation for existence. Although they never used the term existentialism in their
works, Soren Kierkegaard and Friedrich Nietzsche are considered two of the first and significant
philosophers to the existentialist movement. They focused on subjective human experience and were
interested in the struggle to escape boredom and find meaning in life. Kierkegaard and Nietzsche
also stressed the importance of making free choices and how these choices change the identity of the
individual. Both Kierkegaard and Nietzsche felt that life is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
In this stage thoughtful and deliberate choice replaces the instant gratification of pleasure in the first
stage. In this stage man focuses of self–reflection and chooses to create ethical values by which he
will live his life. Once man has reflected to the point of realizing that 'he is involved in something
more profound, he is faced with another either/or decision to stay at this stage or take a leap of faith
and live a Christian life.
Nietzsche shares a similar view of man. The important thing in man is his potential; man is striving
but for something different, Ubermensch or superman. It represents man constantly striving to
overcome himself and become a man whose values are independent from societal conceptions of
good and evil. Ubermensch must be willing and able to reject what he is now to become something
different and never become content with present values. Similar to Kierkegaard, Nietzsche sees life
as a series of stages that take man from the herd to Ubermensch. The first step for man to achieve
Ubermensch is to overcome a collective herd view of values because they are not bridges to
Ubermensch. Once this herd is overcome, man can begin to concentrate on overcoming himself.
Both philosophers also agree that the individual is more important than the group. Kierkegaard says
that "a crowd in its very concept is the untruth." The crowd can only hinder the individual by
making him irresponsible and hiding the

Nietzsche Dionysis Essay
What method does Nietzsche use to become the Dionysian Overman? What perspective on life does
the Overman adopt? How does it enable "amor fati" and express optimum Yes–saying to our present
natural life in the world? How does this overcome "slave morality or religion"? Nietzsche uses
acceptance of fate, its obstacles, adversity and also its divinity to become the Dionysian Overman.
He believes by affirming life in both its cruelty and beauty that we can achieve joy in the present
without the need for beliefs in an afterlife or future existences. Nietzsche states the Overman holds a
love for natural life, with no grudges or sense of resentment whilst others hold spitefulness despite
their religious beliefs and hence they cannot enjoy life ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This is because, "The child is innocen[t]...a new beginning... the spirit now wills its own will, the
spirit sundered from the world now wins its own world..." (Hollingdale trans., Penguin, pg 55.) Now
with a mindset free from societal pressure and preconceived ideals one may become overman and
go forth with a joyful perspective on life. The Overman adopts the perspective that beauty, cruelty,
happiness and sadness despite their definitional differences are to be appreciated all the same. He
explains that it is the obstacles in life that spurn the greatest happiness, it is explained in this
Chinese Proverb: The flower that blooms in adversity is the rarest and most beautiful of all.
Nietzsche believes that as "there is no adversity in Heaven there can be no such beautiful flowers
blooming there" (PHIL1087 #4) and hence no chance for courage, generosity and personal growth.
There is hence no chance to adopt a Dionysian perspective and be at one with all of what is natural,
to thence be able to find true Dionysian virtue. This virtue lies in the acceptance of all that is
pleasurable and painful. It then brings happiness as Nietzsche argues that "vice sprouts from
disaffection...resentment, spite, from the...lack of inner power and its joy". As the Overman can hold
no sense of resentment, or grudge and through metamorphosis has a strong sense of

Nietzsche Overman Analysis
Nietzsche's overman has the right to make promises because he, according to Nietzsche, is the only
being who is able to keep those promises. For Nietzsche, an overman has the strength of character:
the reliability and regularity to be able to make promises ("Second essay: 'Guilt', 'bad conscience'
and related matters" 36). Nietzsche connects the would promise with the word responsibility, and
the importance of that in a man who has the ability to make promises.
Nietzsche refers to the ability to make promises as the mastering of free will, and he states how
could a man who as mastered free will, "how could he remain ignorant of his superiority over
everybody who does not have the prerogative to promise or answer to himself" ("Second essay:
'Guilt', 'bad conscience' and related matters" 37). This gives insight into the overman because if the
overman is the only being who has the right to make promises, then they must also be an awareness,
a conscience, of self. This ability to make and keep promises is not the only component of the
overman's character though.
The overman has a character of that is in charge of their own free will, and is free of the burden of
bad conscience, and is not slave to ressentiment. The overman is a being of strength and not of
weakness; the overman character must be strong as it has to overcome attacks from those who see
strength as a negative. This base character is what allows the overman to not fall into the gripe of
ressentiment and

Influence Of Nietzsche On Christianity
Friedrich Nietzsche's view of master and slave morality lies in the differentiation of two periods of
time in western civilization. Before the fall of the Western Roman Empire, master ideals such as
passion, pride, competition and the concept of accepting ones fate were accepted and considered
positive traits. After the fall; Judeo/Christian thought replaced master ideals with what Nietzsche
calls, slave ideals such as equality, humility, conformity and the hating/rejection of one's place in
life. The vilification of master ideals following the fall of Rome and the rise of Christianity led to a
perversion of hierarchical roles in society where the weak rule and the strong are suppressed and
imprisoned by faulty morality. Nietzsche's roman ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He saw the cult as a religion of pure instinct and selfishness that he believes society must return to.
He writes, "For it is only in the Dionysian mysteries, in the psychology of the Dionysian condition,
that the fundamental fact of the Hellenic instinct expresses itself – its will to life.". This will is
something that Nietzsche feels Socrates through Plato perverted, ancient Greece was a place that
encouraged strength and a pursuit of master ideals. He believes that ancient Greeks were concerned
less with Plato's world of being and more with the world of becoming. That living in and
experiencing the joys and pleasures that life brings, was more important that thinking about what
some abstract realm of being and the concepts of a higher reality. He saw in them a practicality that
Socratic reason does not have despite the fact of being labeled as decadent due to them being
famous for orgies. Remember though that to Nietzsche there is nothing decadent about following
your nature, to him the Dionysian is simply celebrating life. Rather it is the rationalist who is the
decadent with their insistence on doubt and their obsession with the higher plane. Nietzsche writes
"To be sure

The Influence Of Nietzsche On Free Will
Nietzsche regards free will not only to be a philosophical error but also to be a falsification in
society (651). Nietzsche suggests that any particular "will" is going to be strong or weak to some
actual degree and points out that with "will" there are thoughts and our thoughts can flow and
change just as things in the universe flow and change (651). According to Nietzsche, the underlying
force driving all change is will and it boils down to a drive for freedom and domination over other
things (651). Nietzsche states that we use "the four great errors" constantly to misinterpret reality
and thus create many illusions that are used to show the world in a more convenient light for us
(651). Nietzsche states that the first error is the most dangerous one, which is mistaking the cause
and effect and regards it as an error that is the most recent and yet has been a habit for centuries
(651). Since this error is praised by society as religion and morality, it ends up limiting people with
either encouragement or restrictions (651). ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Nietzsche concludes that people tend to be insecure about themselves when compared to people
around them, which can lead to destruction of oneself (652). "Inner facts", which include the will,
the ego and the spirit. With these "inner facts" humans project their subjectivity onto the world
through the doers from which every doing follows (652). Nietzsche argued that there are no causes
that originate from will and through mental causes (652). This has led them to consider ego as the
concept of being and they have put spirit as the cause, instead of reality, thus establishing a measure
for that reality

Antichrist Nietzsche
The transvaluation of all values is a concept from the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche. Friedrich
Nietzsche was born in a small town in the Prussian province of Saxony. Ironically the philosopher
who rejected religion and coined the phrase "god is dead" was a descendant of respected clergymen.
Nietzsche's critique of religion is largely based on his critique of Christianity. He states that he
dislikes religion especially Christianity because it encourages and promotes slave morality.
Nietzsche claims that there are two types of morality, master–morality and slave–morality. Master
morality is found in the ruling class while the ruled posses the latter. Master–morality is where the
master is the judge and creator of values. A morality that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
He attacked tradition while calling for a new society and culture. Nietzsche wanted to transcend
modernity for a whole new mode of culture and society that would create stronger and more fully
developed humans. Nietzsche wrote during a period of great German economic expansion and
industrialization. This was a period in history that a lot of changes were taking place in the country
and in the world. People were also trying to get their place in society as everything around them was
changing.
Nietzsche believes that moral philosophers also call for the destruction of life. He believes that
philosophers who say people seek happiness are unwilling to answer the truth about power. Moral
philosophers call for virtues to reach happiness. Nietzsche claims that pleasure is a sensation of
power and if passions are excluded, you prevent the greatest sensations of power.
Nietzsche hopes there will be a transvaluation of values so that the Will of Power will take
prominence. It states in the text," Need I say expressly after all thus that they will be free, very free
spirits, these philosophers of the future." (pg.222) Nietzsche introduces the Will to Power in
opposition to the old Christian values of compassion. According to Nietzsche, Christians reject the
Will to Power and suppress it

The Philosophies of Friedrich Nietzsche Essay
Philosophies of Friedrich Nietzsche Friedrich Nietzsche was a 19th–century German philosopher
and held in regard amongst the greatest philosophers of the early part century. He sharpened his
philosophical skills through reading the works of the earlier philosophers of the 18th century such as
Immanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill, Arthur Schopenhauer and African Spir; however, their works and
beliefs were opposite to his own. His primary mentor was Author Schopenhauer, whose belief was
that reality was built on the foundation of experience. Such as it is, one of his essays, Schopenhauer
als Erzieher, published in 1874, was dedicated to Schopenhauer (Mencken, 2008). In the past two
centuries, his work has had authority and influence in both ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
The fact that he gave up and refused to fight back gives room for more findings. He disagrees with
the Christian community for making Jesus a martyr and sees that in so doing, they had made the
Christ teachings vague. Nietzsche wrote his works in the process of rebuilding the damage caused
by Christians during the ancient days. His inclination was to show the true way in which God
wanted human beings to live as opposed to what Christians were doing. Another philosophy of
Nietzsche was related to the notion of ressentiment. Defined, ressentiment is any cautious, defeatist,
or cynical attitude based on the belief that the individual and human institutions exist in a hostile or
indifferent universe or society and an oppressive awareness of the futility of trying to improve one's
status in life or in society (dictionary.com). In the work, On the Genealogy of Morals, ressentiment
is illustrated in the way the Jewish clerics act in response to the authority of the Romans. Nietzsche
states, "the Jews, that priestly people, who in opposing their enemies and conquerors were
ultimately satisfied with nothing less than a radical revaluation of their enemies' values, that is to
say, an act of the most spiritual revenge. For this alone was appropriate to a priestly people, the
people embodying the most deeply repressed priestly vengefulness." The feeling of ressentiment is
subconscious and communicates Nietzsche's analysis of

Nietzsche Vs Tocqueville
Nietzsche is primary criticism of morality is not one of morality itself but of how people people
think of morality, and of the dominant morality of the time. He dislikes the idea of supplying a
"rational foundation for morality," (Nietzsche 80) because it assumes morality itself to be one fixed
entity. Instead, he recommends the preparation of a typology of morals for different contexts,
because the same actions can be more or less virtuous depending on one's situation. Nietzsche, then,
would call justice a relative phenomenon that arose from the most prominent morality. Hence, any
rational justification of any one morality is just an expression of the faith in the morality one
follows. Nietzsche is also critical of the predominant moral ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He considers democracy a secularisation of Christianity, and by extension the slave morality. His
argument against democracy is similar to that of Tocqueville: if everyone is equal, no one has the
incentive to be exceptional, which dulls one's resolve to assert their will to power. The individual's
power is nearly insignificant compared to the society's, which leads to the tyranny of the majority,
where anyone who does not share in the majority opinion has no influence. Here, Tocqueville is
referring to a tyranny of the majority over thought, which he believes happens in democracies
because once the majority opinion is pronounced, no one challenges it. Because of this
phenomenon, even though their laws allow for freedom of speech, Tocqueville claims that he "
[does] not know of any country where, in general, less independence of mind and genuine freedom
of discussion reign than in America." (Tocqueville 244) Most importantly, the equality in
democracies causes a disinterest in working hard and creating new things, because it does not
reward the creator, since everyone is equal. People then start to care more for entertainment and
comfort, and their souls turn soft. Nietzsche describes the greatest experience as "the hour of the
great contempt," (Nietzsche 61) which sheds light on his criticism of this happy state. He advocates
for a pride that forces one to see one's mediocrity, and not be satisfied with mere happiness, but
work hard to make way for the overman. The villagers, meant to illustrate the precursors to the last
man in Thus Spoke Zarathustra, are almost caricatures of people living under a democratic regime.
They are compared to a mindless herd that has one collective voice with no individuality, and show
no capacity to understand Zarathustra. They are even grouped with a corpse when

Nietzsche Influence
Srivaishnav Gandhe Dr.Bird English 453.6 30 Nov. 2017 Thesis Nietzsche and his Influence on the
Modern Western World "Nietzsche is an atheist, a life–affirming nihilist, an extreme pessimist, a
trickster, a gleefully defiant irreverent rebel and a sick hero", my father said when I asked, "What
does Nietzsche mean to you." My father was one of the many people who hated Nietzsche. And
maybe he is right in his own perspective because, "What do we do when someone questions our
existence?." "What do we do when someone says God is dead?." "What do we do when someone
comes and shakes the foundations of our beliefs?." But most of all the question is "what do we do
when someone questions everything we believe in?." I wouldn't say Nietzsche is telling the truth,
because even he doesn't believe in the concept of truth. To put it in his words "To tell the truth is to
lie according to a fixed convention." So, to me Nietzsche is a not a man who tells you whether your
beliefs are true or false, but challenges you whether your belief about your beliefs are soundly
premised. He upends your universe, so that you can reharmonize it over, on your own terms.
Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche was born on October 15,1844, the son of Karl Ludwig and Franziska
Nietzsche. When young Friedrich was about five years old he lost his father. Then soon after that he
lost his brother. These events left young Friedrich the only male in the family that included his
mother, sister, paternal grandmother and an aunt. Upon the loss of Karl Ludwig, the family moved
to Naumburg, Saxony. Friedrich gained admittance to the prestigious Schulpforta, where he received
Prussia's finest education in Humanities, Theology, and Classical Languages. In addition, Nietzsche
played piano and composed music. In 1864, Nietzsche entered the University of Bonn, spending the
better part of that first year unproductively, joining a fraternity and socializing with old and new
acquaintances. By this time he had also given up Theology, dashing his mother's hopes of a career in
the ministry for him. Instead he choose the study of classical languages and a career in Philology. In
1865, he followed his major professor, Friedrich Ritschl, from Bonn to the University of Leipzig
and

Nietzsche Outline
Sangita Bashyal Prof Outline Philosophy 101 3 December 2017 Friedrich Nietzsche Friedrich
Wilhelm Nietzsche is a German philosopher. He was a nineteen–century's philosopher and he
challenged the Christianity and morality. He was born in the town of Rochen, near Leipzig on
October 15, 1844. He was the son and grandson of a minister. When he was four years old his father
passed away and after six months later, his younger brother suddenly passed away. After that
incident Nietzsche, his sister and mother moved to the place where his two aunts were living. He
was an intelligent student and his teachers were inspired by his work at school. In fact, his teacher
Friedrich Wilhelm Ritschl wrote a letter in his reference the Nietzsche was so promising that "He
will simply be able to do anything he wants to do". (R.Lanier Anderson, Nietzsche's Life and
works). In 1970, he volunteered as a nurse's assistant (Nietzsche vii). He was a philosopher, poet
psychologist. However, "he did not develop a theory of history" (Carl E. Pletsch). Pletsch also said
in his article, he was one of the most complex thinkers. He had given his effort in philosophy
lecture, in psychology and in his education, such as history. He was one of the most powerful
thinkers in the world. He started illness from his early period of time. He was enthusiastic on his
health problems since his childhood. He tried to find explanations for those health problems and
described them exhaustively. Nietzsche His poor

Essay On Nietzsche And Metaphysics
Although the problem of the relationship between Nietzsche and metaphysics might seem to be a
settled issue, this is in fact a quite complicated and fascinating problematic. The difficulty with this
subject lies in the often unacknowledged ambiguity that the term 'metaphysics' exhibits in
Nietzsche's writing, as this word assumes different nuances and connotations in different contexts.
Therefore, if we can get past the usual rhetoric on the topic, we come to realize that Nietzsche
addresses the topic of metaphysics in at least two distinct ways.
If we broadly understand metaphysics to be the inquiry concerning how reality is in itself, then we
find in the work of Nietzsche two different levels of discourse regarding his opinion of metaphysics.
On one level, we find the Nietzsche that we all know, the staunch opposer of metaphysics as
Platonism who greatly influenced later thinkers such as Martin Heidegger and Jean–Luc Marion.
However, on another level, there is a Nietzsche who is completely at ease in employing this term in
a positive way. This, is particularly clear in the light of Nietzsche's first publication, The Birth of
Tragedy. Heavily influenced by figures such as Schopenhauer and Wagner, in this text Nietzsche
avails himself of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
To this effect, I shall explore this text's connections to Nietzsche's key intellectual influences. First, I
shall address the impact of the Schopenhauerian view of the world on The Birth of Tragedy, in
particular as regards the opposition between Apollo and Dionysus and the nature and goal of tragic
art. Subsequently, I shall refer to the influence of Richard Wagner's thought in order to explore the
relationship between metaphysics and art as humanity's "true metaphysical

Nietzsche And Morality Analysis
Nietzsche, as his title of the book "Genealogy of Morality" shows, denies the abrupt beginning or
origin of morality. Just like human beings, he believes that morality evolves through history. The
world, especially the West, is largely based on the Christian norms and values, and philosophers,
starting from Plato to Kant, strived to find morality beyond the reality. They created and perceived
another world where God exists and placed morality on the same board. Morality is an edict comes
from God and therefore, universal, unquestionable and sustains. Nietzsche critiques this conception
of morality. Instead, he sees morality as a gradual process. He does not understand why the one with
perpetuity only deserves value and questions the necessity ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Slave morality believed in the possibility of separating actions from actors, and Nietzsche attributes
to the grammar for the construction of this notion. The subject–verb relationship makes people
perceive that a subject has a choice to either act or not, as if lightning has a choice to either flash or
not. Slaves separated themselves from action and thought themselves to have freedom to choose the
way they want to live, while they thought those with power were not free to perceive correctly and
could not stop themselves from hurting others. They revalued their powerlessness as positive, and
reinterpreted it as freedom and merit and therefore, here, they deemed themselves as

Impact Of Nietzsche On Individuality
Friedrich Nietzsche was a man built upon contradictions. So much in fact, that one could argue him
to be both one of the most anti–democratic thinkers and one of the most democratic thinkers of our
time. If one attempts to read Nietzsche's works as a whole, you may undoubtedly be persuaded that
he is one of the most anti democratic political theorists in the modern era because of his insistence
upon the need of a hierarchical, aristocratic society and his anti–equality stance on the relationship
between men and women. But, if one reads select pieces of Nietzsche without prior bias of his
works, one could argue that his views on the necessity of individuality and creativity make him a
purely democratic thinker. This paradox creates problems ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
This stance on equality is what makes Nietzsche's writings seem anti–democratic. Although he
doesn't devote an entire chapter to his feelings on women, he mentions them enough to have a vivid
idea of how he truly feels on the topic. Nietzsche refers to women as objects living in the
"background" and for which the sole purpose is to be desirable to men (BGE 84). He claims that as
the woman ages she becomes less desirable and appealing. He states that a woman's true source of
power lies in her ability to bear children and to supply "recreation" to the warrior (TSZ 18). He
continues on by attacking the integrity and honor of the woman by saying women are incompatible
with truth (BGE 232). Truth is "repugnant" and "alien" to her, while "her great art is the lie" (BGE
232). Calling the woman vain and attempting to discredit her worth is one way Nietzsche shows his
feelings on how women are beneath men in value. He ends a section in Thus Spoke Zarathustra by
stating when "you go to women...don't forget the whip!" (TSZ 18). This can be interpreted for men
to not forget their place over women, to not forget his place as master over the woman, and to assert
his dominance. Is he referring to women as slaves, or that they should be treated in the same manner
as slaves to show where they belong on his theoretical totem pole? When Nietzsche calls for a return
to nature, it seems that he wants

Nietzsche And Buddhism
Both, Friedrich Nietzsche and the Buddha, at least at the level of conventional truth, look at the life
and the world as largely nihilistic and unsatisfying, and search for a solution to the meaninglessness
of their respective cultural situations by turning within and advocating a transformation of our inner
forces and of our outlook on the world. The major difference between Nietzsche and Buddhism,
however, lies in the role of the will in nihilism and its overcoming. For the Buddha, only by cutting
the root of the fundamental will altogether, through the self–overcoming of the will to power, one
can step beyond nihilism. The radicality of both Nietzsche's negation and his affirmation of life, on
the contrary, is limited insofar as the "standpoint

Nietzsche and Edwards Essay
Friedrich Nietzsche unquestionably serves as a model for the single best pundit of religion. At the
flip side of this range, Jonathan Edwards develops as his archrival regarding religious talk.
Nietzsche contends that Christianity's stance to all that is exotic is that grounded in danger, out to
manageable all that rests on nature, or is characteristic, much the same as Nietzsche's position on the
planet and his perspectives. Considering this current, Edwards' perspectives on Christianity ought to
be seen in setting focused at the individuals who concur with his thought, that G–d is incredible and
past the limit of human reason.
Edwards reaffirms for his group of onlookers G–d's Spiritual and Divine Light. This light conferred
to the spirit by G–d, is of an alternate nature from any that is acquired by common means. Edwards
spells out that his sermon was not planned to address the men who accept singularly in life's
common condition and the annoyance of G–d. Otherworldly light is likewise something that can't be
seen by eye, just by "due fear of those things that are taught in the expressions of G–d." It is at this
crossroads that Nietzsche wholeheartedly concurs, confirming that the 'Kingdom of Heaven' is a
state of the heart and is not something that radiates from death or comes 'upon the earth'.
Be that as it may, Nietzsche exposes Edward's concept of sin, asserting it as an invention used to
conjure fear in the devotees of Christianity and to mean decision force to

Nietzsche Quotes

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Alison Carias

More from Alison Carias (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Nietzsche Quotes