2. Gustav Freytag
Gustav was a German novelist and playwright.
In 1839, he settled in Breslau, as Privatdozent (Private lecturer) is a title conferred in some
European university systems, especially in German-speaking countries, for someone who
pursues an academic career and holds all formal qualifications.
He helped to conduct it until 1861, then again from 1867 till
1870. For a short time he edited a new periodical,
Im neuen Reich. In 1863 he developed what is known
as ‘Freytag's pyramid’. The dramatic structure is the structure
of a dramatic work such as a play or film. Many scholars have
analyzed dramatic structure, beginning with Aristotle in his
Poetics. Gustav use’s his analysis on ancient Greek and QuickTimeª and a
decompressor
Shakespearean drama. are needed to see this picture.
3. Freytag, believed a drama is divided into five parts, or acts. These include:
• exposition,
• rising action,
• climax,
• falling action,
• dénouement.
Exposition or Introduction:
The exposition provides the background information needed to properly understand the story, such as the
problem in the beginning of the story, characters, and setting.
Rising action:
During rising action, the basic internal conflict is complicated by the introduction of related secondary conflicts,
including various obstacles that frustrate the protagonist's attempt to reach his goal. Secondary conflicts can
include adversaries of lesser importance than the story’s antagonist, who may work with the antagonist or
separately, by and for themselves or actions unknown, and also the conflict.
Climax:
The third act is that of the climax, or turning point, which marks a change, for the better or the worse, in the
protagonist’s affairs. If the story is a comedy, things will have gone badly for the protagonist up to this point;
now, the tide, so to speak, will turn, and things will begin to go well for him or her. If the story is a tragedy,
the opposite state of affairs will ensue, with things going from good to bad for the protagonist. Simply put,
this is where the main part happens or the most dramatic part.
Falling action:
During the falling action the conflict between the protagonist and the antagonist unravels, with the protagonist
winning or losing against the antagonist. The falling action might contain a moment of final suspense, during
which the final outcome of the conflict is in doubt.
4. Dénouement, resolution, or catastrophe:
• The dénouement comprises events between the falling action and the actual ending scene
of the drama or narrative and serves as the conclusion of the story. Conflicts are resolved,
creating normality for the characters and a sense of catharsis, or release of tension and
anxiety, for the reader. Etymologically, the French word dénouement is derived from the
Old French word dénouer, "to untie", and from nodus, Latin for "knot." Simply put,
dénouement is the unraveling or untying of the complexities of a plot.
• The comedy ends with a dénouement (a conclusion) in which the protagonist is better off
than at the story's outset. The tragedy ends with a catastrophe in which the protagonist is
worse off than at the beginning of the narrative. Exemplary of a comic dénouement is the
final scene of Shakespeare’s comedy As You Like It, in which couples marry, an evildoer
repents, two disguised characters are revealed for all to see, and a ruler is restored to
power. In Shakespeare's tragedies, the dénouement is usually the death of one or more
characters.
• More modern works may have no dénouement, because of a quick or surprise ending.
(taken off the internet)
5. • Although Freytag's analysis of dramatic structure is based on
five-act plays, it can be applied (sometimes in a modified
manner) to short stories and novels. However the pyramid is not
always easy to use, especially in modern plays, for example
Alfred Uhry's "Driving Miss Daisy", which is actually divided into
25 scenes without concrete acts.
6. • Freytag's literary fame was made universal by the publication of his novel, Soll
und Haben (Debit and Credit), which was translated into almost all European
languages. Its main purpose is the recommendation of the German middle class
as the soundest element in the nation, but it also has a more directly patriotic
intention in the contrast it draws between the supposedly homely virtues of the
German, while presenting in negative light Poles and Jews.
