ECQ_4_5_6.docx.pdf

RES100-11. METHODS OF RESEARCH
Name: ORTEGA, Wellamae P.
Instruction. Answer each question then submit your answer in Turnit-in format.
Chapter 4:
End of Chapter Questions
 What is the meaning of the word philosophical framework relative to social research?
When we identify a specific field of study, or a research issue, or a social
research process, the conceptual context is epistemology (or the foundation of
understanding or theory) behind everything. This includes the work undertaken in
this field, in the context of a hypothesis or method that could be used with each
other to propose, improve or endorse the study that we would be going to
investigate.
 What is the three philosophical frameworks in the social research and explain each.
1) Positivism- It is a research analysis technique that uses various quantitative tools
for intelligent analysis, like questionnaires, surveys, and more, to analyze an
individual's interactions.
2) Social Constructionism- It defines the particular truth of each person's experience
and knowledge and applies it to anyone else. It emphasizes setting in your
situation which can be evaluated, criticized, and approved or denied.
3) Interpretivism- This is a social research technique that uses various observational
approaches, like interviews, collective and individual analyses of patterns or
activities taking place in our culture, to research people's perspectives and
emotions.
 How to create a theoretical framework?
The researcher would first figure out the sources of the research. Then they've got
to conserve the literature they've looked for. Read and review the applicable literature.
Finally, they have to build a theoretical structure based on the literature they have
reviewed and evaluated.
 Explain the difference between the qualitative and quantitative data.
Qualitative data are data that can be measured. These are the kinds of data that are
accurate, measurable, and quantifiable in terms of quantity. Usually, it is interpreted as
numbers. While qualitative data is data that cannot be measured. Some data are detailed
and cannot be quantified easily. These are the data that have defined emotions, thoughts,
and comprehension.
 What is methodological pyramid?
Methodological Pyramid illustrates that different techniques match the core theory
and the specific strategies of knowledge collection. The theological structure within the
research paper is located in the process of developing the philosophical framework of the
study plan.
 Explain and outline the five basic elements of a research process.
1
This study source was downloaded by 100000797192072 from CourseHero.com on 04-03-2022 09:41:15 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/83464253/ECQ-456docx/

Methodology
The analysis
methodology or
concept used
Epistemology
The principle of knowledge
is incorporated into the
logical and methodological
point of view.
Methods
These are the
methods used in
research to obtain
knowledge.
Ontology
The conclusions are built into
the theoretical perspective and
hence into the methodology
on the essence of truth.
Theoretical Perspective
Is the theological context
within which the technique is
used well educated and
anchored.
 Give at least three philosophical frameworks usually used in social science research and
explain.
 Symbolic interactionism
It is fact derives from the mutual importance of human interaction by
retaining the person established importance of human communication.
 Feminism
It implies that social, political, and economic equity, freedom,
inclusiveness, and opportunities between men and women are the key
focus of this philosophy.
2

 Hermeneutics
This is the philosophy of understanding and the analysis of interpretation
techniques. It is being used to classify methods for theorizing instances in
which certain understanding can also be conducted out.
 Explicate the statement “concept are the building blocks of theory”.
It tells us things that are being researched, correlated, and linked to each other. A
definition is a concept that defines a part of reality. It is a generic name for the particular
cases of the phenomena mentioned.
 What is the process of developing theory and concisely explain?
To support and contradict the knowledge of your report, first, you need to define
the specifics of the literature review hypothesis. Then, you also need to decide how
applicable the knowledge is to area theory. Lastly, you connect the outcomes of the
documented research findings illustrated in the research study publications.
 Why is it important to involve the literature before making a choice about the center of
the study?
It is important to consider the literature before forming the main idea because the
literature you review provides you with the material on which you partly create the
questions you pose during the analysis knowledge collection process. Overall, the
research goals must be transparent to the researcher.
Chapter 5:
End of Chapter Questions:
1) How to elaborate idea and explain extensively the good question in refining ideas?
Trying to narrow down the topic or theme by adding more information or terms
may allow the researcher to concentrate on a narrower main idea or may help to improve
a research issue. Choose a topic or issue that suits your research, one that can really be
examined. After that, note all the questions you'd like to know. Brainstorming is perhaps
the best-known method like this and, possibly, the most popular, in one way somehow,
but it has developed a very large number of creative techniques. They can be applied both
to promote innovation and to increase performance in the issue.
2) Explain the process and the factors to consider when developing research question.
When developing research question, it could be addressed by capturing and
breaking down knowledge, Anticipates the probability of varying events or conclusions,
it’s prohibited. What makes a good teacher like that? Consider what kind of study would
react to this investigation. Research question should be clear. Is in the private
investigation. Some analysis problems have climaxes (strongly linked sub-questions),
however, for the time being, the emphasis is simply on a single leading inquiry for that
you are attempting to find an answer in the present writing. It is based on proven
3

hypotheses. The principle is perfected. You may limit the argument by specifying what
you want to do with the circumstances or what you are referring to.
3) Define and differentiate the three common research methodologies.
Interview is the most powerful and commonly used technique for the conducting
of qualitative material. This is achieved by a directed dialogue between both the
interviewer and the participant. Observations is a form of technique may be used to
produce both quantitative and qualitative results. The disadvantages to using this kind of
approach are legal issues that could emerge when performing the research. Document
Research includes extracting evidence from real records without needing to interview
individuals.
4) Discuss briefly the importance of questions in relation to literature for research project
The thought process of writing interviews and surveys in research writing is
typically the first step in preparing and considering your discovery. You'd like not to
rewrite the restrictions; getting what you need right is now what's significant.
Chapter 6:
End Chapter Questions
 List common mistake to avoid in reviewing the literature.
Reviewing a literature is not:
 Simply a set of documents that you believe are relevant, or any document
that you see.
 Addressed as just a collection where each text is addressed in order.
 A list of all the content relevant to your area of study, regardless of its
importance to your plan.
 A descriptive overview of each article.
 What is a theoretical framework?
The "theoretical framework" is the second framework among the four constructs
of the research study strategy. The second paradigm, thus, is based on the theoretical
framework and emerges out of the conceptual framework.
 Give some pointers in writing the literature review.
1. Proof of reading would still be needed for some study.
4

2. Researchers gather several data, but then pick, arrange and interpret results into a
cohesive pattern.
3. Not only can the system include a map of how the study will be performed and
interpreted, but it would also provide you an overview of the framework for your
analysis.
4. Research analyses must be concise and, much further than possible, include an
image of the state of information and main problems in a small sample in the field
of your subject.
5. Make sure all sources are complete. Notice the text citation of some positive ideas
quotes and paraphrases. You can't do it without the root being remembered. If you
do, you might be included in the plagiarism contest.
6. Observe your own language. This might be possible to make inferences, but it is
impossible to 'prove' when working with human beings.
7. Check your references thoroughly before you plan to use them.
8. Know, once you equate like with like, you can't make any arguments about
comparability.
9. Don't be tempted to abandon all of our study papers only because they vary from
your own conclusions.
10. Begin your first draft review soon in your research. A lot of drafts will be needed
until you have a cohesive and 'relevant' account, but it's easier to start tiny and
then expand on your first attempt than to make sense of anything you've read in
one try.
 How to prevent plagiarism in the literature review?
You need to refer to the research to prevent plagiarism in the literature review.
Made sure that all sources are correct. Notice the comparison list with certain
constructive suggestions for quotations and paraphrases. If you may not refer
appropriately, you might be included in the plagiarism challenge.
 What is the importance of literature review?
A major benefit of the literature review is that it assures that your topic is
researchable before sufficient test starts. Too frequently, new science students balance the
scope of their research with its importance.
 Cite some activities that need to be consider in writing literature review.
5

After all, the review of the literature would do the following:
1. Being structured around rather than specifically relevant to the thesis or study
issue that you are creating.
2. Synthesize the findings with a description of what is or is not understood.
3. Classify troublesome areas or areas of contentiousness in the literature
4. Formulate problems or concerns that require further study
 Questions to be considered when conducting a literature review.
According to Taylor S. in writing a literature here are questions to be consider,
1. What is the basic thesis, issue, or study question that my review of the literature
seeks to describe?
2. What kind of literature review am I implementing? I am looking at the problems
of philosophy, methods, strategy, quantitative analysis, qualitative research.
3. What is the scope of my study of the literature? What kind of journals do I use?
4. Does the author formulate a question/problem?
5. Have I evaluated the opportunities I've identified critically?
6. How am I going to stop mentioning and summing up resources? Do I measure
them, address strengths and weaknesses?
7. Have I cited and addressed findings that are contradictory to my point of view?
8. Will the audience find my review of the literature important, acceptable and
helpful?
9. How reliable and true are the calculations, figures or data presented by the author?
10. Is the study of observations, figures or data reliable and important to the research
issue?
11. Are the findings validly founded on evidence and observation?
6

 How to locate sources for literature review?
To locate sources for the literature review, the key path is via the online libraries
of every college online library. This database will mostly contain scholarly journal papers
that also do or do not subscribe to the accessible library, or are increasingly common to
articles that are available for free in digital format at once.
 What is the difference between a quality and a poor literature review?
According to (Hart, 1998), quality means proper/appropriate width and scope,
specificity and accuracy, concision, clarification, synthesis, and successful analysis; in
other terms, by use of ideas in the research to endorse a particular strategy for the topic,
the choice of strategies and processes and the evidence that this research leads to
something special. While a poor literature review cannot be blamed on the individual
scholar, but it also can be a mistake for those who provide instruction in science
education.
 List at least five purposes of literature review. Discuss briefly.
1. Trying to distinguish what's been accomplished from what needs to happen.
2. Explore essential variables related to the topic.
3. To synthesize and develop a new insight.
4. Trying to establish the context of the question or issue.
5. Trying to rationalize the relevance of the dilemma.
Research has an imaginary aspect. That's the desire to build and interact with
pictures in your imagination or on paper, to rediscover the kid in an adult. This refers to
dreaming using visual symbols, without restriction or preconceptions, which includes
giving the brain free rein.
7
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

ECQ_4_5_6.docx.pdf

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to ECQ_4_5_6.docx.pdf

Similar to ECQ_4_5_6.docx.pdf (20)

More from SiegriqueCeasarAJalw

More from SiegriqueCeasarAJalw (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

ECQ_4_5_6.docx.pdf