SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 11
EXAMINING THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG JOB
ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT AND TURNOVER
INTENTION
SAUBAN AHMED 13449
INTRODUCTION
OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this article is to test the relationships among job satisfaction, organizational
commitment and turnover intention.
METHOD: An online survey using google docs has been conducted
SAMPLE: Total respondents 57 out of which 47 are male and 10 are female
CONCEPTUAL MODEL
Affective commitment refers to an
employee's emotional attachment to
in the organization.
Continuance commitment refers to
employee need to stay due to the
potential loss of benefits.
Normative commitment reflects a
feeling of obligation to remain with
the organization as the organization
expects their loyalty.
HYPOTHESIS
 Hypothesis 1: Job satisfaction is related to affective commitment of employee.
 Hypothesis 2: Job satisfaction is related to continuance commitment of employee.
 Hypothesis 3: Job satisfaction is related to normative commitment of employee.
 Hypothesis 4: Job satisfaction is negatively related to turnover intention of employee.
 Hypothesis 5: Affective commitment is related to turnover intention of employee.
 Hypothesis 6: Continuance commitment is related to turnover intention of employee.
 Hypothesis 7: Normative commitment is related to turnover intention of employee.
DEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLES
LATENT CONSTRUCT
Constructs Code Measurement Items Source
Job satisfaction
JS1 I consider my job rather unpleasant.
(Brayfield and Rothe, 1951)
JS2 Each day of work seems like it will never end.
JS3 I feel fairly satisfied with my present job
JS4 Most days I am enthusiastic about my work
JS5 I find real enjoyment in my work
Affective
Commitment
AC1 I would be very happy to spend the rest of my career with this organization.
(Allen and Meyer, 1990; Meyer, Allen,
and Smith, 1993)
AC2 I really feel as if this organization's problems are my own.
AC3 I feel like "part of the family" at my organization.
AC4 I feel "emotionally attached" to this organization.
Continuance
Commitment
CC1 Right now, staying with my organization is a matter of necessity as much as desire.
(Allen and Meyer, 1990; Meyer, Allen,
and Smith, 1993)
CC2 It would be very hard for me to leave my organization right now, even if I wanted to.
CC3 Too much of my life would be disrupted if I decided I wanted to leave my organization nom.
CC4
One of the few negative consequences of leaving this organization would be the scarcity of
available alternatives.
Normative
Commitment
NC1 Even it were to my advantage, I do not feel it would be right to leave my organization now.
(Allen and Meyer, 1990; Meyer, Allen,
and Smith, 1993)
NC2 I would not leave my organization right now because I have a sense of obligation to the people in it.
NC3 I owe a great deal to my organization.
NC4 I would feel guilty if I left my organization now.
Turnover Intention
TI1 I intend to leave the organization.
(Lance, 1988; Khatri, Fern, and
Budhwar, 2001)
TI2 I intent to make a genuine effort to find another job over the next few months.
TI3 I often think about quitting.
SCALE RELIABILITY ISSUES
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha
Cronbach's Alpha Based
on Standardized Items N of Items
.389 .423 5
Scale Mean if Item Deleted
Scale Variance if
Item Deleted
Corrected Item-Total
Correlation
Squared Multiple
Correlation
Cronbach's Alpha if
Item Deleted
JS1 13.14 9.801 -.188 .189 .620
JS2 13.05 8.086 .053 .103 .448
JS3 12.23 6.608 .343 .420 .217
JS4 12.12 6.110 .500 .684 .095
JS5 12.19 5.909 .463 .705 .102
Cronbach's Alpha
Cronbach's Alpha Based
on Standardized Items N of Items
.620 .636 4
Scale Mean if Item Deleted
Scale Variance if
Item Deleted
Corrected Item-Total
Correlation
Squared Multiple
Correlation
Cronbach's Alpha if
Item Deleted
JS2 10.51 8.933 -.081 .013 .863
JS3 9.68 5.720 .515 .415 .463
JS4 9.58 5.284 .686 .684 .336
JS5 9.65 4.910 .683 .701 .314
SCALE RELIABILITY
Scale Constructs Cronbach's Alpha
Job satisfaction (Brayfield and Rothe, 1951) 0.863
I feel fairly satisfied with my present job
Most days I am enthusiastic about my work
I find real enjoyment in my work
Affective Commitment (Allen and Meyer, 1990; Meyer, Allen, and Smith, 1993) 0.859
I would be very happy to spend the rest of my career with this organization.
I really feel as if this organization's problems are my own.
I feel like "part of the family" at my organization.
I feel "emotionally attached" to this organization.
Continuance Commitment (Allen and Meyer, 1990; Meyer, Allen, and Smith, 1993) 0.648
Right now, staying with my organization is a matter of necessity as much as desire.
It would be very hard for me to leave my organization right now, even if I wanted to.
Too much of my life would be disrupted if I decided I wanted to leave my organization nom.
One of the few negative consequences of leaving this organization would be the scarcity of available alternatives.
Normative Commitment (Allen and Meyer, 1990; Meyer, Allen, and Smith, 1993) 0.765
Even it were to my advantage, I do not feel it would be right to leave my organization now.
I would not leave my organization right now because I have a sense of obligation to the people in it.
I owe a great deal to my organization.
I would feel guilty if I left my organization now.
Turnover Intention (Lance, 1988; Khatri, Fern, and Budhwar, 2001) 0.844
I intend to leave the organization.
I intent to make a genuine effort to find another job over the next few months.
I often think about quitting.
SCALE CORRELATIONS
Correlations
Mean SD
Job
Satisfaction
Affective
Commitment
Continuance
Commitment
Normative
Commitment
Turnover
Intention
Job Satisfaction Pearson Correlation 3.50 1.00 1
Affective Commitment Pearson Correlation 3.03 1.07 .532**
1
Continuance Commitment Pearson Correlation 3.37 0.87 -.183 .027 1
Normative Commitment Pearson Correlation 2.87 1.00 .289*
.521**
.175 1
Turnover Intention Pearson Correlation 3.09 1.22 -.414**
-.537**
.128 -.403**
1
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
HYPHOTHESIS TESTING
R2
Value Beta F Sig
H1: Job satisfaction is related to affective commitment of employee. 0.274 0.524 20.780 0.000 Accepted
H2: Job satisfaction is related to continuance commitment of employee. 0.013 -0.101 0.709 0.403 Rejected
H3: Job satisfaction is related to normative commitment of employee. 0.063 0.241 3.669 0.061 Rejected
H4: Job satisfaction is negatively related to turnover intention of employee. 0.113 -0.413 6.995 0.011 Accepted
H5: Affective commitment is related to turnover intention of employee. 0.231 -0.545 16.495 0.000 Accepted
H6: Continuance commitment is related to turnover intention of employee. 0.034 0.254 1.938 0.169 Rejected
H7: Normative commitment is related to turnover intention of employee. 0.085 -0.370 5.082 0.028 Accepted
Overall Model 0.279 5.023 0.002 Accepted
 = 0.95
OVERALL MODEL TESTING
Job
Satisfaction
Affective
Commitment
Continuance
Commitment
Normative
Commitment
Turnover
Intention
ANOVAa
Model
Sum of
Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
1 Regression
24.409 4 6.102 5.023 .002b
Residual 63.170 52 1.215
Total 87.579 56 a
Model
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Standardized
Coefficients
t Sig.
Collinearity Statistics
B
Std.
Error
Beta Tolerance VIF
1 (Constant) 4.558 .862 5.288 .000
Normative
Commitment -.166 .164 -.130 -1.009 .318 .834 1.199
Affective
Commitment -.426 .165 -.376 -2.576 .013 .651 1.536
Continuance
Commitment .230 .164 .167 1.402 .167 .979 1.022
Modified Job
Satisfaction -.108 .171 -.088 -.629 .532 .714 1.400
TI = 0.862 - 0.108x1 – 0.426x2 + 0.230x3 – 0.166x4

More Related Content

Similar to ABR Presentation.pptx

values attitue and jobsatisfaction.pptx
values attitue and jobsatisfaction.pptxvalues attitue and jobsatisfaction.pptx
values attitue and jobsatisfaction.pptx
Dr. Akhil Goyal
 
Why employees quit organization
Why employees quit organizationWhy employees quit organization
Why employees quit organization
Debojite Bhowmick
 
Organizational cynicism
Organizational cynicismOrganizational cynicism
Organizational cynicism
Banu Gokcul
 

Similar to ABR Presentation.pptx (15)

Organizational Citizenship Behavior (ocb)
Organizational Citizenship Behavior (ocb)Organizational Citizenship Behavior (ocb)
Organizational Citizenship Behavior (ocb)
 
Commitment2
Commitment2Commitment2
Commitment2
 
Loyalty
LoyaltyLoyalty
Loyalty
 
values attitue and jobsatisfaction.pptx
values attitue and jobsatisfaction.pptxvalues attitue and jobsatisfaction.pptx
values attitue and jobsatisfaction.pptx
 
Wave Program
Wave ProgramWave Program
Wave Program
 
Ob presentation
Ob presentationOb presentation
Ob presentation
 
Job satisfaction
Job satisfactionJob satisfaction
Job satisfaction
 
Job satisfaction.ppt
Job satisfaction.pptJob satisfaction.ppt
Job satisfaction.ppt
 
Why employees quit organization
Why employees quit organizationWhy employees quit organization
Why employees quit organization
 
Organizational Theory and Management - Presentation.pptx
Organizational Theory and Management - Presentation.pptxOrganizational Theory and Management - Presentation.pptx
Organizational Theory and Management - Presentation.pptx
 
Attitudes and job satisfaction
Attitudes and job satisfactionAttitudes and job satisfaction
Attitudes and job satisfaction
 
Performance appraisal doc
Performance appraisal docPerformance appraisal doc
Performance appraisal doc
 
Organizational cynicism
Organizational cynicismOrganizational cynicism
Organizational cynicism
 
Ob casestudy
Ob casestudyOb casestudy
Ob casestudy
 
Shine life insurance
Shine life insuranceShine life insurance
Shine life insurance
 

Recently uploaded

SURVEY I created for uni project research
SURVEY I created for uni project researchSURVEY I created for uni project research
SURVEY I created for uni project research
CaitlinCummins3
 
Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPS
Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPSSpellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPS
Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPS
AnaAcapella
 
會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽
會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽
會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽
中 央社
 

Recently uploaded (20)

SURVEY I created for uni project research
SURVEY I created for uni project researchSURVEY I created for uni project research
SURVEY I created for uni project research
 
ĐỀ THAM KHẢO KÌ THI TUYỂN SINH VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH FORM 50 CÂU TRẮC NGHI...
ĐỀ THAM KHẢO KÌ THI TUYỂN SINH VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH FORM 50 CÂU TRẮC NGHI...ĐỀ THAM KHẢO KÌ THI TUYỂN SINH VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH FORM 50 CÂU TRẮC NGHI...
ĐỀ THAM KHẢO KÌ THI TUYỂN SINH VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH FORM 50 CÂU TRẮC NGHI...
 
MOOD STABLIZERS DRUGS.pptx
MOOD     STABLIZERS           DRUGS.pptxMOOD     STABLIZERS           DRUGS.pptx
MOOD STABLIZERS DRUGS.pptx
 
AIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.ppt
AIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.pptAIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.ppt
AIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.ppt
 
How to Manage Website in Odoo 17 Studio App.pptx
How to Manage Website in Odoo 17 Studio App.pptxHow to Manage Website in Odoo 17 Studio App.pptx
How to Manage Website in Odoo 17 Studio App.pptx
 
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English (v3).pptx
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English (v3).pptxGraduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English (v3).pptx
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English (v3).pptx
 
Observing-Correct-Grammar-in-Making-Definitions.pptx
Observing-Correct-Grammar-in-Making-Definitions.pptxObserving-Correct-Grammar-in-Making-Definitions.pptx
Observing-Correct-Grammar-in-Making-Definitions.pptx
 
TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...
TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...
TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...
 
VAMOS CUIDAR DO NOSSO PLANETA! .
VAMOS CUIDAR DO NOSSO PLANETA!                    .VAMOS CUIDAR DO NOSSO PLANETA!                    .
VAMOS CUIDAR DO NOSSO PLANETA! .
 
OS-operating systems- ch05 (CPU Scheduling) ...
OS-operating systems- ch05 (CPU Scheduling) ...OS-operating systems- ch05 (CPU Scheduling) ...
OS-operating systems- ch05 (CPU Scheduling) ...
 
Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPS
Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPSSpellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPS
Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPS
 
24 ĐỀ THAM KHẢO KÌ THI TUYỂN SINH VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH SỞ GIÁO DỤC HẢI DƯ...
24 ĐỀ THAM KHẢO KÌ THI TUYỂN SINH VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH SỞ GIÁO DỤC HẢI DƯ...24 ĐỀ THAM KHẢO KÌ THI TUYỂN SINH VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH SỞ GIÁO DỤC HẢI DƯ...
24 ĐỀ THAM KHẢO KÌ THI TUYỂN SINH VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH SỞ GIÁO DỤC HẢI DƯ...
 
Đề tieng anh thpt 2024 danh cho cac ban hoc sinh
Đề tieng anh thpt 2024 danh cho cac ban hoc sinhĐề tieng anh thpt 2024 danh cho cac ban hoc sinh
Đề tieng anh thpt 2024 danh cho cac ban hoc sinh
 
Improved Approval Flow in Odoo 17 Studio App
Improved Approval Flow in Odoo 17 Studio AppImproved Approval Flow in Odoo 17 Studio App
Improved Approval Flow in Odoo 17 Studio App
 
PSYPACT- Practicing Over State Lines May 2024.pptx
PSYPACT- Practicing Over State Lines May 2024.pptxPSYPACT- Practicing Over State Lines May 2024.pptx
PSYPACT- Practicing Over State Lines May 2024.pptx
 
會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽
會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽
會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽
 
e-Sealing at EADTU by Kamakshi Rajagopal
e-Sealing at EADTU by Kamakshi Rajagopale-Sealing at EADTU by Kamakshi Rajagopal
e-Sealing at EADTU by Kamakshi Rajagopal
 
When Quality Assurance Meets Innovation in Higher Education - Report launch w...
When Quality Assurance Meets Innovation in Higher Education - Report launch w...When Quality Assurance Meets Innovation in Higher Education - Report launch w...
When Quality Assurance Meets Innovation in Higher Education - Report launch w...
 
Basic Civil Engineering notes on Transportation Engineering & Modes of Transport
Basic Civil Engineering notes on Transportation Engineering & Modes of TransportBasic Civil Engineering notes on Transportation Engineering & Modes of Transport
Basic Civil Engineering notes on Transportation Engineering & Modes of Transport
 
ANTI PARKISON DRUGS.pptx
ANTI         PARKISON          DRUGS.pptxANTI         PARKISON          DRUGS.pptx
ANTI PARKISON DRUGS.pptx
 

ABR Presentation.pptx

  • 1. EXAMINING THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG JOB ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT AND TURNOVER INTENTION SAUBAN AHMED 13449
  • 2. INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this article is to test the relationships among job satisfaction, organizational commitment and turnover intention. METHOD: An online survey using google docs has been conducted SAMPLE: Total respondents 57 out of which 47 are male and 10 are female
  • 3. CONCEPTUAL MODEL Affective commitment refers to an employee's emotional attachment to in the organization. Continuance commitment refers to employee need to stay due to the potential loss of benefits. Normative commitment reflects a feeling of obligation to remain with the organization as the organization expects their loyalty.
  • 4. HYPOTHESIS  Hypothesis 1: Job satisfaction is related to affective commitment of employee.  Hypothesis 2: Job satisfaction is related to continuance commitment of employee.  Hypothesis 3: Job satisfaction is related to normative commitment of employee.  Hypothesis 4: Job satisfaction is negatively related to turnover intention of employee.  Hypothesis 5: Affective commitment is related to turnover intention of employee.  Hypothesis 6: Continuance commitment is related to turnover intention of employee.  Hypothesis 7: Normative commitment is related to turnover intention of employee.
  • 6. LATENT CONSTRUCT Constructs Code Measurement Items Source Job satisfaction JS1 I consider my job rather unpleasant. (Brayfield and Rothe, 1951) JS2 Each day of work seems like it will never end. JS3 I feel fairly satisfied with my present job JS4 Most days I am enthusiastic about my work JS5 I find real enjoyment in my work Affective Commitment AC1 I would be very happy to spend the rest of my career with this organization. (Allen and Meyer, 1990; Meyer, Allen, and Smith, 1993) AC2 I really feel as if this organization's problems are my own. AC3 I feel like "part of the family" at my organization. AC4 I feel "emotionally attached" to this organization. Continuance Commitment CC1 Right now, staying with my organization is a matter of necessity as much as desire. (Allen and Meyer, 1990; Meyer, Allen, and Smith, 1993) CC2 It would be very hard for me to leave my organization right now, even if I wanted to. CC3 Too much of my life would be disrupted if I decided I wanted to leave my organization nom. CC4 One of the few negative consequences of leaving this organization would be the scarcity of available alternatives. Normative Commitment NC1 Even it were to my advantage, I do not feel it would be right to leave my organization now. (Allen and Meyer, 1990; Meyer, Allen, and Smith, 1993) NC2 I would not leave my organization right now because I have a sense of obligation to the people in it. NC3 I owe a great deal to my organization. NC4 I would feel guilty if I left my organization now. Turnover Intention TI1 I intend to leave the organization. (Lance, 1988; Khatri, Fern, and Budhwar, 2001) TI2 I intent to make a genuine effort to find another job over the next few months. TI3 I often think about quitting.
  • 7. SCALE RELIABILITY ISSUES Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha Cronbach's Alpha Based on Standardized Items N of Items .389 .423 5 Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted Corrected Item-Total Correlation Squared Multiple Correlation Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted JS1 13.14 9.801 -.188 .189 .620 JS2 13.05 8.086 .053 .103 .448 JS3 12.23 6.608 .343 .420 .217 JS4 12.12 6.110 .500 .684 .095 JS5 12.19 5.909 .463 .705 .102 Cronbach's Alpha Cronbach's Alpha Based on Standardized Items N of Items .620 .636 4 Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted Corrected Item-Total Correlation Squared Multiple Correlation Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted JS2 10.51 8.933 -.081 .013 .863 JS3 9.68 5.720 .515 .415 .463 JS4 9.58 5.284 .686 .684 .336 JS5 9.65 4.910 .683 .701 .314
  • 8. SCALE RELIABILITY Scale Constructs Cronbach's Alpha Job satisfaction (Brayfield and Rothe, 1951) 0.863 I feel fairly satisfied with my present job Most days I am enthusiastic about my work I find real enjoyment in my work Affective Commitment (Allen and Meyer, 1990; Meyer, Allen, and Smith, 1993) 0.859 I would be very happy to spend the rest of my career with this organization. I really feel as if this organization's problems are my own. I feel like "part of the family" at my organization. I feel "emotionally attached" to this organization. Continuance Commitment (Allen and Meyer, 1990; Meyer, Allen, and Smith, 1993) 0.648 Right now, staying with my organization is a matter of necessity as much as desire. It would be very hard for me to leave my organization right now, even if I wanted to. Too much of my life would be disrupted if I decided I wanted to leave my organization nom. One of the few negative consequences of leaving this organization would be the scarcity of available alternatives. Normative Commitment (Allen and Meyer, 1990; Meyer, Allen, and Smith, 1993) 0.765 Even it were to my advantage, I do not feel it would be right to leave my organization now. I would not leave my organization right now because I have a sense of obligation to the people in it. I owe a great deal to my organization. I would feel guilty if I left my organization now. Turnover Intention (Lance, 1988; Khatri, Fern, and Budhwar, 2001) 0.844 I intend to leave the organization. I intent to make a genuine effort to find another job over the next few months. I often think about quitting.
  • 9. SCALE CORRELATIONS Correlations Mean SD Job Satisfaction Affective Commitment Continuance Commitment Normative Commitment Turnover Intention Job Satisfaction Pearson Correlation 3.50 1.00 1 Affective Commitment Pearson Correlation 3.03 1.07 .532** 1 Continuance Commitment Pearson Correlation 3.37 0.87 -.183 .027 1 Normative Commitment Pearson Correlation 2.87 1.00 .289* .521** .175 1 Turnover Intention Pearson Correlation 3.09 1.22 -.414** -.537** .128 -.403** 1 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
  • 10. HYPHOTHESIS TESTING R2 Value Beta F Sig H1: Job satisfaction is related to affective commitment of employee. 0.274 0.524 20.780 0.000 Accepted H2: Job satisfaction is related to continuance commitment of employee. 0.013 -0.101 0.709 0.403 Rejected H3: Job satisfaction is related to normative commitment of employee. 0.063 0.241 3.669 0.061 Rejected H4: Job satisfaction is negatively related to turnover intention of employee. 0.113 -0.413 6.995 0.011 Accepted H5: Affective commitment is related to turnover intention of employee. 0.231 -0.545 16.495 0.000 Accepted H6: Continuance commitment is related to turnover intention of employee. 0.034 0.254 1.938 0.169 Rejected H7: Normative commitment is related to turnover intention of employee. 0.085 -0.370 5.082 0.028 Accepted Overall Model 0.279 5.023 0.002 Accepted  = 0.95
  • 11. OVERALL MODEL TESTING Job Satisfaction Affective Commitment Continuance Commitment Normative Commitment Turnover Intention ANOVAa Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 24.409 4 6.102 5.023 .002b Residual 63.170 52 1.215 Total 87.579 56 a Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. Collinearity Statistics B Std. Error Beta Tolerance VIF 1 (Constant) 4.558 .862 5.288 .000 Normative Commitment -.166 .164 -.130 -1.009 .318 .834 1.199 Affective Commitment -.426 .165 -.376 -2.576 .013 .651 1.536 Continuance Commitment .230 .164 .167 1.402 .167 .979 1.022 Modified Job Satisfaction -.108 .171 -.088 -.629 .532 .714 1.400 TI = 0.862 - 0.108x1 – 0.426x2 + 0.230x3 – 0.166x4