One of the important discoveries of New Energy scientists over the past two decades has been that Planck's values for mass, time, and length are probably not constant as was once believed. They only seemed constant because humanity had yet to find effective ways of varying the density of the Zero Point Field in a given area. Now that we are developing this ability, many fascinating new technologies are on the horizon.

1. New Energy for an Ultra-modern Vietnam
Part 3: The Science
Section C: Implications
June 2014

2. To discuss this presentation and pose
any questions you may have, please
visit our website,
www.nangluongmoisaigon.org

3. Just as most scientists continue to think
that the speed of light in a vacuum
doesn’t change, they also tend to think
that Planck’s “constant” can’t change.

4. Planck’s constant (h)relates the energy
in one quantum (photon) of
electromagnetic radiation to the
frequency of that radiation.
h = 6.62606957 × 10-34 m2 kg/s
(commonly accepted value today)

5. Planck’s constant is important because
it determines how we calculate atomic
charge and atomic units

6. These things, then, affect how
chemical reactions (including those
related to LENRs) take place

7. Max Planck’s
basic discovery
in calculating
“Planck’s
constant” was
that energy
moves in steps
called “quanta”,
not in a
continuous
fashion

8. From Planck’s constant, he then
derived Planck’s:
Mass: 2.17645 × 10−8 kg
Length: 1.616252×10−35 m and
Time: 5.39121 × 10−44 s

9. And yet, since
1940,
scientists have
experimentally
observed a
general rise in
the value for
Planck’s
“constant”http://www.setterfield.org/ZPE_light_tim
e/ZPE_light_and_time.html#Planck

10. Planck’s constant is closely connected with ZPE
• In 1911, Planck’s equation for the radiant energy
density ρ of a black body was given as:
ρ(f,T)df = (8πf2/c3){[hf/(ehf/kT – 1)] + [hf/2]} df
Here, f is radiation frequency, c is light-speed, and k is
Boltzmann’s constant. If the temperature, T, in (4)
drops to zero, we are still left with the Zero Point term,
hf/2, in the final set of square brackets.
http://www.setterfield.org/ZPE_light_time/ZPE_light_an
d_time.html#Planck

11. ρ(f,T)df = (8πf2/c3){[hf/(ehf/kT – 1)] + [hf/2]} df
• Since T does not occur in that final set of
terms, that means they are temperature
independent.
• Planck’s constant, h, only appears in the Zero
Point term as a scale factor to align theory
with experiment; no quantum interpretation
is needed.
Planck’s constant is closely connected with ZPE

12. ρ(f,T)df = (8πf2/c3){[hf/(ehf/kT – 1)] + [hf/2]} df
• Being a scale factor means that if the ZPE
strength was greater, then the value of h
would be correspondingly larger.
• This means h turns out to be a measure of the
strength of the ZPE
Planck’s constant is closely connected with ZPE

13. It follows that if ZPE can fluctuate over
time, the Planck values will also vary
over time!

14. Following Haramein’s insistence on self-
similarity at all cosmological scales,
Robert Oldershaw of Amherst University
believes that the Planck values need to be
furthermore adjusted for the force of
gravity. If we do so, we get a new set of
Planck values which closely resemble the
dimensions of the proton, one of nature’s
most common subatomic particles

15. Oldershaw’s gravity-adjusted “Planck”
values:
http://www3.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw/newdevyear/20
08/March.htm

16. In Oldershaw’s view, the revised value for
Planck’s constant is the discrete unit of
gravitational action for atomic-scale systems.
This means that the gravitational bonds within
atomic scale systems are about 137 times
stronger than the electromagnetic
interactions within those systems.

17. Thus, when we are creating Charged
Water/Gas clusters, Exotic Vacuum
Objects, etc., and then combusting
them, we are breaking very strong
gravitational bonds

18. The implications of viewing gravity as an important
part of atomic-level interactions include:
• In bound particles, nucleons, and nuclei,
gravity can be even more important than
electromagnetic forces at the atomic and
quantum levels
• Unbound atoms, ions, and particles have very
weak gravitational interactions; their
interactions are primarily electromagnetic

19. • The formation of a hydrogen atom from an
undbounded proton and unbounded electron
is a plasma-like interaction very similar to that
seen in certain stellar interactions
• Gravitation plays the dominant role for
internal interactions, while electromagnetism
plays the dominant role for external
interactions among unbounded systems.
The implications of viewing gravity as an important
part of atomic-level interactions include:

20. If we understand the cosmos in this way, we
see the physical universe behaving quite
uniformly, whether we are looking at an
atom, a solar system, or a galaxy

21. Let’s look even
more closely at
some of the
implications of the
Planck values being
variable (not
constant), after all

22. The Planck length is based on the
Uncertainty Principle, which says that the
faster a subatomic particle is traveling, the
less accurately we can predicts its position
at any given instant.

23. Since subatomic particles oscillate with
a typical speed that is seen in most
situations, it then becomes possible to
calculate the range of uncertainty with
regard to a particle’s position, and we
call the range of this uncertainty
Planck’s length.

25. However, if subatomic particles speed
up, the level of uncertainty increases,
and hence we need to increase the
value of “Planck’s length”. If subatomic
particles slow down, then it’s easier to
predict their position and thus Planck’s
length can be adjusted downward.

26. When your system begins to attract and
cohere ZPE, you are changing the value of
“Planck’s constant” (which as we can see
really isn’t constant) within the system.

27. That is one
reason that ZPE
extraction
systems exhibit
heat, energy, and
light which
mainstream
scientists label
“anomalous”

28. The flexible nature of the Planck
values (based on the level of
coherence of ZPE) can be applied to a
system’s experience of time as well.
Potentially, some of those systems
could have humans inside of them.

29. As Thomas Campbell explains, Planck’s
constant (and hence Planck’s time) tells us
that our physical reality is like a big movie
that can be divided into discrete frames
appearing on the screen.

30. But in this movie that we call “Physical
Experience”, the ‘refresh rate’ that we usually
experience is extremely fast, well over 8
billion ‘frames per second’

31. But if we can excite and cohere the
ZPE in the quantum foam, we
effectively increase the value of the
Planck time, allowing fewer Planck
units of time to pass relative to the
time-space outside our system, it is as
though time has “slowed down” for
the materials and/or organisms inside
the system.

32. Let’s also think about the effect that
variability of the value for Planck’s
constant can have on mass.

33. When ZPE is strong, it causes subatomic
particles to oscillate or “jitter” more, thus
increasing their uncertainty

34. The bigger the oscillations, the more
space the particles are effectively
taking up – which we interpret as
increasing their mass.

35. Since inertia is also correlated with mass, if
we can decrease the ZPE in a system, it
means we can decrease the mass of the
subatomic particles and, hence, “dampen”
the inertial forces

36. Here is another corollary:
If we increase mass as a result of greater ZPE,
the particles in the nucleus and the electrons
of an atom will tend to slow down
Animation: f0.pepst.com

37. This means that stronger ZPE will
cause an atomic clock to tick more
slowly --

38. Which also means that radioactive
isotopes will slow their decay rate

39. One consequence of this circumstance is that
paleontologists may need to factor in the
lower historical values for Planck’s “constant”
when dating ancient fossils using uranium-
lead dating

40. Barry Setterfield estimates that in the
Paleozoic Era (541 to 252 million years
ago), ZPE was only about one-tenth as
strong as it is today

41. He contends that this allowed the nervous
systems of plants and animals to work about
ten times their speed today

42. And thus enabling the evolution of
animals and plants that are, by today’s
standards, extremely large

43. If Setterfield’s theory is correct, it would
also mean that the speed of light at
some point in the Paleozoic was around
10 times faster than it is today

44. Here, we see a plot
of the speed of
light starting on
the left with our
current time and
proceeding
toward the right
to the beginning
of our physical
universe.
http://www.4thdayalliance.com/
articles/distant-
starlight/barry-setterfield/

45. The key point I’d like to convey in this
section of the seminar is that if Planck’s
constant, the Planck time, speed of light,
etc. have varied over time,
there are probably ways you can
artificially induce similar variances for
these values in your ZPE systems.

46. You need not feel as though the Universe has
erected all of the speed limits, stop signs, and
road blocks that your textbooks have tried to
indoctrinate you about.

47. Variability of the Planck values is one
of the most exciting fields of research
in New Energy science. It is likely to tell
us much about our conscious
awareness and our abilities to perceive
in ways that transcend the five physical
senses.
Stay tuned for more!