Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Project presentation format.ppt
1. Performance Analysis of WiMAX
Network with Relay Station
Guided by: Presented by:
Prof…. Mubeen A Khan
Department of Computer Science & Engineering
Medi-Caps Institute of Technology and Management, Indore 1
2. Contents
1. WiMAX Introduction
2. Key Features of WiMAX
3. Problem Statement
4. Proposed Solution
5. Relay Station
6. Tool used(Network Simulator)
7. Project Setup
8. Simulation Results
9. Conclusion
10. Future Work
11. References
2
3. 1. WiMAX
• WiMAX is the abbreviation of World Wide Interoperability for
Microwave access.
• ………………...
• ……………………….
• ………………………
3
Performance Analysis of WiMAX Networks
with Relay Station
4. 2. Key Features of WiMAX
1. Works on many bands: 2.3 GHz, 2.5 GHz, 3.5 GHz
2. Scalable: Can use any available spectrum width 1.25 MHz to
28 MHz
3. ………………...
4. ………………..
5. ……………………..
4
Performance Analysis of WiMAX Networks
with Relay Station
5. 3. Problem Statement
• Limited infrastructure of Base station
• Obstacles made the coverage limited
• Limited Capacity in terms of no of nodes
• Multihop
• High Cost of installing Base station
• Dropped packets
• Huge Wired connectivity
5
Performance Analysis of WiMAX Networks
with Relay Station
6. 4. Proposed Solution
• Relay station is an alternative solution to wired broadband
technologies.
• Relay station is used for high date rates
• ………………..
• ………………
• ………………..
• ………………….
• Relay station also does its function in a cost effective way
since it only requires a power source to run
6
Performance Analysis of WiMAX Networks
with Relay Station
7. 5. Relay Station
1. IEEE 802.16j is an enhancement to previous 802.16
standards to provide support for relays, thus providing for
increased capacity and/or coverage, depending on the
scenario.
2. ……………………….
3. …………………….
4. ……………………….
5. …………………………
7
Performance Analysis of WiMAX Networks
with Relay Station
8. • Transparent mode
• ………………………
• …………………………..
• …………………………….
Relay modes in WiMAX
8
Performance Analysis of WiMAX Networks
with Relay Station
9. Non transparent mode
• Both data and control information is relayed between BS
and SS.
• …………………………..
• ………………………….
• ……………………
9
Performance Analysis of WiMAX Networks
with Relay Station
10. 6. Tool used
• Technical Descriptions
• ………………………
• ………………………
• …………………..
10
Performance Analysis of WiMAX Networks
with Relay Station
11. 7. Network Setup
Fig. 7.1 Topology With Relay Station uplink and downlink connection
With Relay Station
11
Performance Analysis of WiMAX Networks
with Relay Station
12. 8. Detailed Analysis
• …………………
12
Performance Analysis of WiMAX Networks
with Relay Station
13. 9. Results
• Simulation results show that the above parameters affect the
performance of including relay station .
• The two performance metrics are:
1. Throughput that measures the amount of raw bytes sent by
a source.
2………………….
………………………
………………………
13
Performance Analysis of WiMAX Networks
with Relay Station
14. Comparison of Throughput and Distance with and
without relay station in downlink connection
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Throughput
(Mbps)
Distance (m)
Distance with Throughput
with Relay station
without Relay station
Fig. 9.1 Performance of Relay station with distance and throughput
14
Performance Analysis of WiMAX Networks
with Relay Station
15. Comparative performance of Relay station with
Throughput and Goodput with Distance and Number of
Nodes.
Scenario Throughput
(With RS)
Goodput
(With RS)
Dropped
Packets
(With RS)
Throughput
(Without
RS)
Goodput
(Without
RS)
Dropped
Packets
(Without
RS)
Effect of
Distance
0.40 for
50m, 0.39
for 250m
and 0.0032
for 500m
0.42 for
50m, 0.42
for 250m
and 0.0032
for 500m
216 up to
200m then
225 up to
500 m
3.04254 up
to 250 m
then 0 after
250 m
3.042 up to
200m then
0 after 250
node
0 up to
250m then
225 up to
500 m
Effect of
Number of
Nodes
0.39 for 5
nodes,0.23
for 45 node
and 0.03 for
95 nodes
0.39 for 5
nodes,0.23
for 45
nodes and
0.03 for 95
nodes
36 for 5
nodes, 396
for 45
nodes and
603 for 95
nodes
6.734 for 5
node,3.04
for 45
nodes and
3.0 for 95
nodes
6 .733 for 5
nodes, 3.04
for 45
nodes and
3.0 for 95
nodes
0 up to 25
nodes 147
for 45 node
and 512 for
95 nodes
15
Performance Analysis of WiMAX Networks
with Relay Station
16. Percent wise comparison of with and without Relay
station
Scenario Throughput
(With RS)
Goodput
(With RS)
Dropped
Packets
(With RS)
Throughput
(Without
RS)
Goodput
(Without
RS)
Dropped
Packets
(Without
RS)
Effect of
Distance
100%
higher
without RS
after 250
nodes
100%
higher
without RS
after 250
nodes
4% higher
with RS
after 250
nodes
86.82%
higher than
with RS up
to 250
nodes
86.08%
higher than
with RS up
to 250
nodes
100%
higher than
without RS
up to 250
nodes
Effect of
Number of
Nodes
---------- ------------
100%
higher than
without RS
initially and
15.09 %
higher up
to 95 nodes
94.07%
higher than
with RS
initially and
98.83%
higher up
to 95 nodes
94.08%
higher than
with RS
initially and
98.93%
higher up
to 95 nodes
----------
16
Performance Analysis of WiMAX Networks
with Relay Station
17. Further studies can be carried out about the performance of
Relay station in WiMAX network with:
1. Various Bandwidth Allocation Techniques
2. …………………….
……………………….
………………………..
……………………………
11. Future Work
17
Performance Analysis of WiMAX Networks
with Relay Station
18. 11. References
[1] IEEE 802.16 Relay Task Group, 2008; http://www. ieee802.org/16/relay/
[2] IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks: Part 16: Air Interface for Broadband Wireless
Access Systems, IEEE Std 802.16- 2009, May 2009, 2094 pp.
[3] ns2,http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/
[4] IEEE,IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks-Part 16: Air Interface for Fixed
Broadband Wireless Access Systems, Standard 802.16-2004, IEEE ,Washington, DC,2004.
[5] The WiMAX Handbook by Taylor and Francis Group p.127. www.taylorandfrancis.com IEEE 802.16
Working Group, “DRAFT Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks Para 16: Air Interface for
Broadband Wireless Access Systems” IEEE P802.16Rev2/D1,Oct.2007
[6] Mobile WiMAX towards Broadband wireless Metropolitan Area Networks Yan Zhang and Hsiao-Hwa chen
page 2
[7] T.Issariyakul“Introduction to NetworkSimulator2” (NS2) www.springerlink.com/Index/J81V644n43238672
.PDF
[8] IEEE 802.16-2004, IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks –Part 16: Air Interface for
Broadband Wireless Access Systems, http://standards.ieee.org/getieee.org/getieee802/download/802.15-
2004.pdf, October 1, 2004.
[9] C. Eklund,R.B. Marks, and K.L. Stanwood, IEEE Standards 802.16: A technical Overview of the Wireless
MAN Air Interface for Broadband Wireless Access, IEEE Commun. Mag.,40(6), 98,2002
[10] C. So-In, R. Jain, and A. Al-Tamimi,“Scheduling in IEEE 802.16e WiMAX Networks: Key issues and a
survey,” IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 156–171, Feb. 2009.
[11] Technical Issues in IEEE 802.16j Mobile Multi-Hop Relay (MMR) Networks, European Journal of
Scientific Research ISSN 1450-216X Vol.65 No.4 (2011), pp. 507-533, EuroJournalsPublishing, Inc. 2011
http://www.europeanjournalofscientificresearch.com
[12] C. So-In, R. Jain, and A. Al-Tamimi, “Capacity evaluation for IEEE 802.16e Mobile WiMAX,” J. Comput.
Syst., Networks, and Commun., vol. 2010, Apr. 2010. 18
