1
Leveraging ISO 31000 for Effective Integration
of Risk Management and Internal Control
Presenter:
Vincent Tophoff
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC)
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
Overview
• Role and domain of IFAC
• Maturity of risk management and internal control
(RM/IC)
• Broader approach in RM/IC
• Broader approach in RM/IC standards, frameworks &
guidelines
• Remaining pitfalls in RM/IC: application failures
• IFAC supports further improvements in RM/IC
2
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
3
The International Federation of Accountants (IFAC)
• The global organization of the accountancy profession
• 172 member bodies and associates in 129 countries
• 2.5 million professional accountants in public practice,
commerce, industry, financial services, the public sector,
education, and the not-for-profit sector
• Public interest focused
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
More than half
are in this box
4
The International Federation of Accountants (IFAC)
• Supports accountants in following areas:
Auditing and accounting
Governance and ethics
Risk management and internal control
Sustainability and corporate responsibility
Financial and performance management
Business reporting
Promoting and contributing to the value of accountants
• All areas of critical importance to the organizations they
work for!
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
5
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
• Crisis
management
• Internal
control now
complemented
with risk
management
• But performed
in a silo…
• Integrating risk
management
and internal
control in the
governance &
management
of organization
Level 1:
Non-existent
or ad hoc
Level 2:
Internal
control only
Level 3:
RM/IC
as a silo
Level 4:
Integrated
RM/IC
•Formal
internal
control
•Mainly
focused on
external
financial
reporting
Integration of RM/IC
Here we are now
6
IFAC survey on risk management & internal control
• Received over 600 responses from around the globe
Main conclusions:
• More awareness of the benefits of risk management and
internal control systems should be created
• Risk management and internal control should be better
integrated into organizations’ overall governance, strategy,
and operations
• Risk management and internal control requirements and
guidelines should be further aligned internationally
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
7
Global Survey on Risk Management & Internal Control
> Proposed Next Steps
• Emphasizing the benefits of (more integrated) risk
management and internal control
• Bringing various risk management and internal control
standard setting organizations (such as COSO, ISO 31000
& Risk Oversight & Governance Board) and their guidelines
closer together
• Collaborating with experts on development of practical
application guidance for (integration of) risk management
and internal control
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
8
Global crisis
According to IFAC research caused by:
• Ethical flaws
• Governance, risk management & internal control in name but
not in spirit
• Regulatory overload, leading to legalistic compliance
• Risk & control systems too narrowly focused on only financial
reporting controls
• However, many, if not most, of the risks that affected
organizations derived from areas other than financial reporting
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
9
Conclusions from survey and global crisis
A. Organizations should take a broader approach in risk
management and internal control
B. Risk management and internal control standards and
principles should better enable taking a broader approach
C. Appropriate application of risk management and internal
control standards and principles is often the problem
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
10
A. Taking a broader approach in RM/IC
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
11
Broader approach in risk management (1)
• Q: “How does your organization address uncertainty in
achieving its strategic objectives?”
• A: “Through our strategic management system;”
Line management engaged in plan-do-check-act cycle
Focused on achieving the organization’s objectives
• Q: “How does your organization address risk?”
• A: “Through our risk management system;”
(separate) risk and control system, staff functionaries,
risk register
Focused on mitigating risk
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
12
Broader approach in risk management (2)
What does this example tell us?
• That we, finance & accounting folks, have made great
progress in the area of risk management and internal control…
• …But that we, in the process, lost the other people in our
organization!
Risk Management
Rest of the Organization
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
13
Broader approach in risk management (3)
Biggest risk facing an
organization:
Disconnect between those
responsible for achieving
strategic objectives vs.
those responsible for
managing risk
Solution:
Making those responsible
for achieving strategic
objectives also responsible
for managing related risks!
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
14
Broader approach in risk management (4)
• Line management is accountable for (achieving) the
organization’s objectives,
• This also includes responsibility for managing the effects of
risk on those objectives
Key objective for management accountants in this regard:
• Ensure that risk management and internal control are fully
integrated in the line management of an organization!
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
15
Broader approach in internal control (1)
• Internal control not as an objective in itself
• But as a response to modify risk
• (In order to achieve the organization’s objectives)
• And…
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
16
Broader approach in internal control (2)
Hindering the
organization
Enabling the
organization
• Good internal control: invisible hand
From To
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
17
B. Collaborating with standard setters
• IFAC collaborates with regulators and standard setters in
area of governance, risk management, and internal control
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
18
IFAC collaboration with Canadian ROGB
• IFAC also participates in the Canadian Risk Oversight and
Governance Board (ROGB)
• Offers guidance to directors and senior managers to fulfill
their responsibility for governance and the oversight of risk
management
• Freely available from the ROGB website
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
19
IFAC collaboration with COSO
• Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO)
• Providing thought leadership through the development of
frameworks and guidance on risk management and internal
control
• Revised Framework issued in May 2013 and available at
www.coso.org
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
20
IFAC collaboration with ISO 31000
• International Standards Organization (ISO) developed the
standard ISO 31000:2009 Risk Management
• Can be used by any public, private or community enterprise,
association, group, or individual
• Can be applied to any type of risk, whatever its nature,
whether having positive or negative consequences (so
broader than ERM)
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
21
Comparison COSO ERM vs. ISO 31000
COSO ISO 31000
• Lengthy vs. Short
• Focused on ERM vs. General approach to managing risk
• One cube vs. Framework and process
• Skewed to negative vs. Risk can be positive or negative
• Risk already exists vs. Risk tied to achieving objectives
• Risk & opportunities vs. Opportunities also source of risk
• More sequential process vs. More iterative process
• However… many organizations use both COSO ERM and ISO 31000
• Biggest challenge is that concepts and terminology are not aligned!
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
Too short, however,
to really understand
22
Bringing together COSO, ISO, ROGB and others
• Best opportunity to further align concepts and terminology by bringing
together the various issuers of standards, guidance & frameworks
• To discuss how the terminology, various concepts & guidelines could
be better aligned
• IFAC facilitates first meeting of COSO, ISO 31000, and ROGB boards
in September 2013 in Chicago
• Including representatives from RIMS and other organizations
• Should all work together to produce globally-aligned terminology,
concepts, and guidelines that are relevant to all users.
• IFAC looks forward to continue contributing to this collaborative effort
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
23
C. Encouraging better application of RM/IC guidelines
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
24
Bad practice vs. good practice in RM/IC
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
Overwhelming load of bad practice:
• RM/IC as objective in itself vs. RM/IC to achieve objectives
• Auditor / staff driven vs. Board and management driven
• Rules-based vs. Principles-based
• Of the shelf systems vs. Tailor made
• Focused on threats only vs. Also focused on opportunities
• Mainly hard controls vs. Social / human aspects
• Artificially implemented vs. Organically implemented
• Stand-alone / “bolt-on” vs. Integrated / ”built-in”
• Static, out-of-date vs. Dynamic, evolving
• Creates costs vs. Creates results / value
• Abandoned vs. Supported
25
IFAC risk management & internal control publications
• Evaluating and Improving Governance in Organizations
• Evaluating and Improving Internal Control in Organizations
• Integrating Governance in for Sustainable Success
• All IFAC Publications free-of-charge at www.ifac.org
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
26
Evaluating and Improving IC in Organizations
• Highlighting areas where practical application of internal
control standards often fails in many organizations
• Designed to establish a benchmark for good practice in
maintaining effective internal control in response to risk
• For all types of organizations, as all organizations—whether
private or public—should have appropriate internal control
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
27
Guidance to avoid or overcome pitfalls
Good internal control should:
• Support the organization’s objectives
• Define clear roles and responsibilities
• Foster a motivational culture
• Link to individual performance
• Ensure sufficient competency
• Respond to risk
• Be communicated regularly
• Be monitored and evaluated regularly
• Provide for accountability and transparency
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
28
Next steps > guidance in integration of risk & control
• Risk management and internal control are a means to an
end: making sound (SWOT) decisions to achieve the
organization’s objectives without surprises!
• Principles on how risk managers can support their
organization integrating risk management and internal
control into the organization’s overall governance and
management system
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
29
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
Key takeaway’s
• Risk management and internal control have matured
• Still many flaws
• IFAC supports:
further integration of RM/IC
Further alignment of RM/IC standards
Better application of RM/IC principles and concepts
• However, no matter the guidance provided…
• …There will always be some who do it their own way!
30
Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013

Leveraging ISO 31000 for Effective Integration of Risk Management and Internal Control

  • 1.
    1 Leveraging ISO 31000for Effective Integration of Risk Management and Internal Control Presenter: Vincent Tophoff International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
  • 2.
    Overview • Role anddomain of IFAC • Maturity of risk management and internal control (RM/IC) • Broader approach in RM/IC • Broader approach in RM/IC standards, frameworks & guidelines • Remaining pitfalls in RM/IC: application failures • IFAC supports further improvements in RM/IC 2 Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
  • 3.
    3 The International Federationof Accountants (IFAC) • The global organization of the accountancy profession • 172 member bodies and associates in 129 countries • 2.5 million professional accountants in public practice, commerce, industry, financial services, the public sector, education, and the not-for-profit sector • Public interest focused Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013 More than half are in this box
  • 4.
    4 The International Federationof Accountants (IFAC) • Supports accountants in following areas: Auditing and accounting Governance and ethics Risk management and internal control Sustainability and corporate responsibility Financial and performance management Business reporting Promoting and contributing to the value of accountants • All areas of critical importance to the organizations they work for! Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
  • 5.
    5 Second international ISO31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013 • Crisis management • Internal control now complemented with risk management • But performed in a silo… • Integrating risk management and internal control in the governance & management of organization Level 1: Non-existent or ad hoc Level 2: Internal control only Level 3: RM/IC as a silo Level 4: Integrated RM/IC •Formal internal control •Mainly focused on external financial reporting Integration of RM/IC Here we are now
  • 6.
    6 IFAC survey onrisk management & internal control • Received over 600 responses from around the globe Main conclusions: • More awareness of the benefits of risk management and internal control systems should be created • Risk management and internal control should be better integrated into organizations’ overall governance, strategy, and operations • Risk management and internal control requirements and guidelines should be further aligned internationally Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
  • 7.
    7 Global Survey onRisk Management & Internal Control > Proposed Next Steps • Emphasizing the benefits of (more integrated) risk management and internal control • Bringing various risk management and internal control standard setting organizations (such as COSO, ISO 31000 & Risk Oversight & Governance Board) and their guidelines closer together • Collaborating with experts on development of practical application guidance for (integration of) risk management and internal control Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
  • 8.
    8 Global crisis According toIFAC research caused by: • Ethical flaws • Governance, risk management & internal control in name but not in spirit • Regulatory overload, leading to legalistic compliance • Risk & control systems too narrowly focused on only financial reporting controls • However, many, if not most, of the risks that affected organizations derived from areas other than financial reporting Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
  • 9.
    9 Conclusions from surveyand global crisis A. Organizations should take a broader approach in risk management and internal control B. Risk management and internal control standards and principles should better enable taking a broader approach C. Appropriate application of risk management and internal control standards and principles is often the problem Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
  • 10.
    10 A. Taking abroader approach in RM/IC Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
  • 11.
    11 Broader approach inrisk management (1) • Q: “How does your organization address uncertainty in achieving its strategic objectives?” • A: “Through our strategic management system;” Line management engaged in plan-do-check-act cycle Focused on achieving the organization’s objectives • Q: “How does your organization address risk?” • A: “Through our risk management system;” (separate) risk and control system, staff functionaries, risk register Focused on mitigating risk Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
  • 12.
    12 Broader approach inrisk management (2) What does this example tell us? • That we, finance & accounting folks, have made great progress in the area of risk management and internal control… • …But that we, in the process, lost the other people in our organization! Risk Management Rest of the Organization Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
  • 13.
    13 Broader approach inrisk management (3) Biggest risk facing an organization: Disconnect between those responsible for achieving strategic objectives vs. those responsible for managing risk Solution: Making those responsible for achieving strategic objectives also responsible for managing related risks! Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
  • 14.
    14 Broader approach inrisk management (4) • Line management is accountable for (achieving) the organization’s objectives, • This also includes responsibility for managing the effects of risk on those objectives Key objective for management accountants in this regard: • Ensure that risk management and internal control are fully integrated in the line management of an organization! Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
  • 15.
    15 Broader approach ininternal control (1) • Internal control not as an objective in itself • But as a response to modify risk • (In order to achieve the organization’s objectives) • And… Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
  • 16.
    16 Broader approach ininternal control (2) Hindering the organization Enabling the organization • Good internal control: invisible hand From To Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
  • 17.
    17 B. Collaborating withstandard setters • IFAC collaborates with regulators and standard setters in area of governance, risk management, and internal control Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
  • 18.
    18 IFAC collaboration withCanadian ROGB • IFAC also participates in the Canadian Risk Oversight and Governance Board (ROGB) • Offers guidance to directors and senior managers to fulfill their responsibility for governance and the oversight of risk management • Freely available from the ROGB website Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
  • 19.
    19 IFAC collaboration withCOSO • Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) • Providing thought leadership through the development of frameworks and guidance on risk management and internal control • Revised Framework issued in May 2013 and available at www.coso.org Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
  • 20.
    20 IFAC collaboration withISO 31000 • International Standards Organization (ISO) developed the standard ISO 31000:2009 Risk Management • Can be used by any public, private or community enterprise, association, group, or individual • Can be applied to any type of risk, whatever its nature, whether having positive or negative consequences (so broader than ERM) Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
  • 21.
    21 Comparison COSO ERMvs. ISO 31000 COSO ISO 31000 • Lengthy vs. Short • Focused on ERM vs. General approach to managing risk • One cube vs. Framework and process • Skewed to negative vs. Risk can be positive or negative • Risk already exists vs. Risk tied to achieving objectives • Risk & opportunities vs. Opportunities also source of risk • More sequential process vs. More iterative process • However… many organizations use both COSO ERM and ISO 31000 • Biggest challenge is that concepts and terminology are not aligned! Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013 Too short, however, to really understand
  • 22.
    22 Bringing together COSO,ISO, ROGB and others • Best opportunity to further align concepts and terminology by bringing together the various issuers of standards, guidance & frameworks • To discuss how the terminology, various concepts & guidelines could be better aligned • IFAC facilitates first meeting of COSO, ISO 31000, and ROGB boards in September 2013 in Chicago • Including representatives from RIMS and other organizations • Should all work together to produce globally-aligned terminology, concepts, and guidelines that are relevant to all users. • IFAC looks forward to continue contributing to this collaborative effort Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
  • 23.
    23 C. Encouraging betterapplication of RM/IC guidelines Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
  • 24.
    24 Bad practice vs.good practice in RM/IC Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013 Overwhelming load of bad practice: • RM/IC as objective in itself vs. RM/IC to achieve objectives • Auditor / staff driven vs. Board and management driven • Rules-based vs. Principles-based • Of the shelf systems vs. Tailor made • Focused on threats only vs. Also focused on opportunities • Mainly hard controls vs. Social / human aspects • Artificially implemented vs. Organically implemented • Stand-alone / “bolt-on” vs. Integrated / ”built-in” • Static, out-of-date vs. Dynamic, evolving • Creates costs vs. Creates results / value • Abandoned vs. Supported
  • 25.
    25 IFAC risk management& internal control publications • Evaluating and Improving Governance in Organizations • Evaluating and Improving Internal Control in Organizations • Integrating Governance in for Sustainable Success • All IFAC Publications free-of-charge at www.ifac.org Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
  • 26.
    26 Evaluating and ImprovingIC in Organizations • Highlighting areas where practical application of internal control standards often fails in many organizations • Designed to establish a benchmark for good practice in maintaining effective internal control in response to risk • For all types of organizations, as all organizations—whether private or public—should have appropriate internal control Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
  • 27.
    27 Guidance to avoidor overcome pitfalls Good internal control should: • Support the organization’s objectives • Define clear roles and responsibilities • Foster a motivational culture • Link to individual performance • Ensure sufficient competency • Respond to risk • Be communicated regularly • Be monitored and evaluated regularly • Provide for accountability and transparency Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
  • 28.
    28 Next steps >guidance in integration of risk & control • Risk management and internal control are a means to an end: making sound (SWOT) decisions to achieve the organization’s objectives without surprises! • Principles on how risk managers can support their organization integrating risk management and internal control into the organization’s overall governance and management system Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013
  • 29.
    29 Second international ISO31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013 Key takeaway’s • Risk management and internal control have matured • Still many flaws • IFAC supports: further integration of RM/IC Further alignment of RM/IC standards Better application of RM/IC principles and concepts • However, no matter the guidance provided…
  • 30.
    • …There willalways be some who do it their own way! 30 Second international ISO 31000 conference – Toronto, 28-31 May 2013