SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 39
RDT-1P B3 Upper Reservoir Perforation
KNOC Operating Office in HCMC, Vietnam
Block Overview
2
Block 11-2
• Location: 320km from Vung Tau
• Basin: Nam Con Son
• Operator: KNOC
• KC (75%), PVEP (25%)
• First Gas : 25th Dec., 2006
Production Enhancement
3
Objectives • To increase gas flow rate and recovery of RD/RDT gas field
• To make decision for additional perforation interval
• To evaluate post perforation job
Terms • January ~ September 2022
Budget • In-house
Work Scope • Petrophysical review
• GWC review
• Review previous PLT and perforation effects
• RDT water production history matching
• Forecasting the perforation effects
• Depth matching of B-3 Upper zone
• Post job evaluation for additional RDT perforation
2022 Work Program
Budget (K USD)
Firm Contingent
Production Enhancement - -
• RDT additional perforation - -
Depth Structure Map of B3
4
IOI Properties
5
RDT-2P
RDT-1RX
RDT-1P
• Net Pay : 2.48 mTVD
• Av. Phie : 14.8%
• Av. Sw : 49.8%
• Av. Vcl : 24.9%
• Av. Klog-Core : 20.2 mD
B-3 Top Depth Structure Map
6.75 in
RDT-1P
Additional Perforation Interval
1.27 MMscfd
42 stbd
IOI (Interval Of Interesting, B-3 Upper)
6
Perforated
Perforated
IOI (Interval Of Interesting, B-3 Upper)
7
RDT-1P
RDT-2P
IOI (Interval Of Interesting, B-3 Upper)
8
Perforated
Sw Intersections of B3 Reservoir
9
N S
W E
RDT-1P
RDT-1P
RDT-1X
RDT-2P
RDT-1X
RDT-2P
GWC and B3 Perforation Intervals
10
<B3 Depth Map>
GWC
GWC
W E
NW SE
Perf. Perf.
Perf.
Perf.
RDT-1P
RDT-2P
RDT-1P
RDT-2P
Seal Capability btw B3 Up. & Lw.
11
B3
C1
C2
Max. 0.51 Vcl
Max. 0.94 Vcl
Max. 0.70 Vcl
?
2 Scenarios of Production Forecast
12
#1 : Barrier Case (Forecast)
#2 : No Barrier Case (Forecast)
Perforated
Seal
U
U
L
C
- Effective Porosity : < <
- Permeability : < <
C L
U
C L
Seal No Seal
?
No Seal
5% 7%
2%
Water
Conning
Initial
GWC
Producing Zone of RDT Wells
13
Well RDT-2P RDT-1P
Well Test Date November, 2021
Gas MMscfd 1.77 3.87
Producing
Zones
(PLT)
PLT
Date
Mar 2017 May 2018
Contribution
Gas
(MMscf/d)
Contribution
Gas
(MMscf/d)
A0 84% 1.49
A1 13% 0.23
A1.5 2% 0.04
A2
A3 1% 0.02 17% 0.66
B2 13% 0.50
B3 44% (2015 PLT) 3.53 (2015 PLT) 33% 1.28
C1 1% 0.04
C2 36% 1.39
RDT-1P
RDT-2P
144% 100%
A0
A0.5
A1
A1-5
A2
A3
B1
B3
C1 upper
C1 lower
C2
D1a
A 3
B 2
B 3
C 1
C 2U
C 2L
D 1b
D 3
D 4
D 5U
D 5L
Dec 2015
Mar 2017
Mar 2016
Mar 2015
Dec 2015
Mar 2015
Jun 2012
Jun 2012
Jun 2012
Jun 2012
Mar 2016
Dec 2018
Mar 2015
Mar 2016
Mar 2015
Jul 2009
May 2011
Production History Of RDT Wells
14
4
130
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
BBL/D
MMSCF/D
RDT-1P Production
Gas Condensate
2
12 0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
BBL/D
MMSCF/D
RDT-2P Production
Gas Condensate
C1+D1+D3+D4+D5 C1+C2+D1+D3+D4+D5 C1+C2UP A3+B3+C1+C2UP A3+B2+B3+C1+C2UP
B1+B3+C1+C2+D1 B1+B3 A1.5+A3+B1+B3 A0+A1+A1.5+A2+A3 A0+A1+A1.5+A2+A3+B1+B3
B3 Production History (RDT-2P)
15
PLT (12 Mar 2013)
52%
PLT(04 Mar 2015)
96%
PLT(01 Dec 2015)
※ (Total Production of RDT-2P) × (Contribution Ratio of B3 by PLT) = B3 Production
B3
Perforation
Push down HEX Plug
to below B3 (Dec, 2018)
A0
A0.5
A1
A1-5
A2
A3
B1
B3
C1 upper
C1 lower
C2
D1a
E1
F1
0.56 MMSCF/D
3.69 BBL/D
30.5% (=44%/144%)
PLT (07 Mar 2017)
44%
(B3/RDT-2P Ratio)
HEX Plug Set
@ above B1
(due to 1,425 bblw/d)
B3 Production History (RDT-1P)
16
PLT(01 Dec 2015) PLT(23 Mar 2016)
PLT(04 Mar 2017)
PLT(24 May 2018)
1.27 MMSCF/D
42 BBL/D
40% 39% 34% 32%
(B3/RDT-1P Ratio)
※ (Total Production of RDT-1P) × (Contribution Ratio of B3 by PLT) = B3 Production
B3
Perforation
A 3
B 2
B 3
C 1
C 2U
C 2L
D 1b
D 3
D 4
D 5U
D 5L
#1 : Barrier Case
#2 : No Barrier Case
2 Scenarios of Production Forecast
17
Perforated
Artificial barrier
B3
Simulation grid
B3
Simulation grid
Proposed perf.
B3 Up.
B3 Upper interval Selection
18
GWC@2869mTVDss
Proposed B3 Up
Proposed Perf. Interval
3921.03-3925.30 mMD
Dec 2015
Simulation Grid Fine Grid
B3 Production Recovery Review
19
RDT-1P Perforation
Zone
2021 Model
GIIP, Bcf
Top Perf.
mTVDSS/
mMD
Bottom perf.
mTVDSS/
mMD
Perf. Length,
mMD
RFDP Cumulative B3
production by
Simulation
(Bcf)
Cumulative B3
production by PLT
allocation
(Bcf)
Recovery
(%)
GWC,
mTVDss
B-3 41.46
(B3 Upper)
2837.29/
3921.03
(B3 Upper)
2839.81/
3925.30
4.27
2869 20.06 26.68 48.38 (Sim.)/ 64.35 (PLT)
(B3 Lower)
2848.02/
3939.80
(B3 Lower)
2852.56/
3947.80
8.0
RD/RDT Reservoir Model Update (2021)
20
RDT-1P History Matching
21
Gas Rate Cond. Rate BHP
Water Rate Water Cut THP
RDT-2P History Matching
22
Gas Rate Cond. Rate BHP
Water Rate Water Cut THP
Remaining Potential (B-3 Upper)
23
#1 : Barrier Case
B3
Artificial barrier
Simulation grid
Proposed perf.
B3 Up.
B-3 Gas Production Rate • No B-3 Upper perf
• With B-3 Upper perf
B-3 Condensate Production Rate
• No B-3 Upper perf
• With B-3 Upper perf
Av. 29.60 bbld increased
Production Forecasting
Av. 0.85 mmscfd increased
YEAR 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Total
Gas
(bcf/yr)
0.19 0.43 0.31 0.23 0.17 0.14 0.11 1.57
Condy
(mbbl/yr)
6.84 15.31 10.60 7.92 5.51 4.36 3.34 53.88
Remaining Potential (B-3 Upper)
24
#2 : No Barrier Case
Simulation grid
B3
Proposed perf.
B3 Up.
B-3 Gas Production Rate • No B-3 Upper perf
• With B-3 Upper perf
B-3 Condensate Production Rate
• No B-3 Upper perf
• With B-3 Upper perf
Av. 5.23 bbld increased
Production Forecasting
Av. 0.16 mmscfd increased
YEAR 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Total
Gas
(bcf/yr)
0.07 0.07 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.31
Condy
(mbbl/yr)
2.36 2.38 1.34 1.08 1.01 0.93 0.72 9.80
Simple Economics (Barrier Case)
25
• Cost
- During PLT work
- 79,689 $US (2017)
- No additional OPEX
• Pay back : 1 Month
• NCF : 7.64 $MM
B-3 Gas Production Rate • No B-3 Upper perf
• With B-3 Upper perf
B-3 Condensate Production Rate
• No B-3 Upper perf
• With B-3 Upper perf
Av. 29.60 bbld increased
Production Forecasting
Av. 0.85 mmscfd increased
Simple Economics (No Barrier Case)
26
B-3 Gas Production Rate • No B-3 Upper perf
• With B-3 Upper perf
B-3 Condensate Production Rate
• No B-3 Upper perf
• With B-3 Upper perf
Av. 5.23 bbld increased
Av. 0.16 mmscfd increased
• Cost
- During PLT work
- 79,689 $US (2017)
- No additional OPEX
• Pay back : 3 Months
• NCF : 1.34 $MM
RD/RDT RFPD-2012 Model Update
27
RDT-1P History Matching
28
Gas Rate
BHP
Water Rate
THP
RDT-2P History Matching
29
Gas Rate
BHP
Water Rate
THP
Remaining Potential (B-3 Upper)
30
#2 : No Barrier Case
Simulation grid
RFDP 2012
B3
Proposed perf.
B3 Up.
B-3 Gas Production Rate • No B-3 Upper perf
• With B-3 Upper perf
B-3 Condensate Production Rate
• No B-3 Upper perf
• With B-3 Upper perf
Av. 35.17 bbld increased
Production Forecasting
Av. 1.15 mmscfd increased
YEAR 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Total
Gas
(bcf/yr)
0.18 0.44 0.41 0.39 0.36 0.34 0.29 2.42
Condy
(mbbl/yr)
5.71 13.81 12.71 11.78 10.85 9.93 8.64 73.43
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 TOTAL
Gas (bcf/yr) 0.18 0.44 0.41 0.39 0.36 0.34 0.29 2.42
Cond (mbbl/yr) 5.71 13.81 12.71 11.78 10.85 9.93 8.64 73.43
Netback Gas
(80% applied, $/mcf)
2.25 2.30 2.34 2.39 2.44 2.48 2.53
Cond ($/bbl) 102.88 89.71 82.64 53.10 54.16 55.25 56.35
CAPEX ($MM) 0.16 - - - - - -
OPEX ($MM) - - - - - - -
Gas ($MM) 0.40 1.02 0.97 0.93 0.88 0.83 0.75 5.78
Cond ($MM) 0.59 1.24 1.05 0.63 0.59 0.55 0.49 5.13
Gas ($MM) 0.16 - - - - - - 0.16
Cond ($MM) - - - - - - - -
NCF $MM 0.83 2.25 2.02 1.55 1.47 1.38 1.23 10.75
Cash-Out
Year
Production
Unit Price
COST
Cash-In
Simple Economics (No Barrier Case)
31
• Cost
- During PLT work
- 79,689 $US (2017)
- No additional OPEX
• Pay back : 1 Months
• NCF : 10.75 $MM
B-3 Gas Production Rate • No B-3 Upper perf
• With B-3 Upper perf
B-3 Condensate Production Rate
• No B-3 Upper perf
• With B-3 Upper perf
Av. 35.17 bbld increased
Av. 1.15 mmscfd increased
Remaining Potential (B-3 Upper)
32
#1 : Barrier Case
B3
Artificial barrier
Simulation grid
RFDP 2012
Proposed perf.
B3 Up.
Production Forecasting
B-3 Gas Production Rate
• No B-3 Upper perf
• With B-3 Upper perf
B-3 Condensate Production Rate
• No B-3 Upper perf
• With B-3 Upper perf
Very minor effect
Very minor effect
감사합니다
Rf) Process, Utility Diagram
34
B3 Upper interval Selection (RFDP2012)
35
RFPD-2012 Model Update (Barrier case in B3)
RDT wells History Matching Effect
36
RDT-1P History Matching
37
Gas Rate
BHP
Water Rate
THP
RDT-2P History Matching
38
Gas Rate
BHP
Water Rate
THP
39
Gas
[Mscfd]
Condy.
[STBD]
Water
[STBD]
Gas
[Mscfd]
Condy.
[STBD]
Water
[STBD]
Gas
[Mscfd]
Condy.
[STBD]
Water
[STBD]
Gas
[Mscfd]
Condy.
[STBD]
Water
[STBD]
Gas
[Mscfd]
Condy.
[STBD]
Water
[STBD]
Gas
[Mscfd]
Condy.
[STBD]
Water
[STBD]
Gas
[Mscfd]
Condy.
[STBD]
Water
[STBD]
Gas
[Mscfd]
Condy.
[STBD]
Water
[STBD]
Gas
[Mscfd]
Condy.
[STBD]
Water
[STBD]
Gas
[Mscfd]
Condy.
[STBD]
Water
[STBD]
Gas
[Mscfd]
Condy.
[STBD]
Water
[STBD]
Gas
[Mscfd]
Condy.
[STBD]
Water
[STBD]
Gas
[Mscfd]
Condy.
[STBD]
Water
[STBD]
Gas
[Mscfd]
Condy.
[STBD]
Water
[STBD]
Gas
[Mscfd]
Condy.
[STBD]
Water
[STBD]
A3 (Mar 2015) 7,818.6 283.5 - 4,121.4
- - - 4,725.2 128.6 1,769.5 2,413.1 98.8 790.5 1,083.9 11.6 3,836.8 681.6 4.7 1,652.5 1,189.6 - 3,855.1 467.2 50.7 1,149.5
B2 (Mar 2016) 803.4 8.0 15.2 202.6 2.5 5.3 353.3 - 19.1 162.5 - 2.6
B3 (Mar 2015) 10,158.2 366.7 - 8,850.6 - - 9,199.6 173.8 96.2 6,983.5 170.9 41.8 2,194.7 14.1 98.7 2,058.2 6.6 75.1 2,083.4 - - 1,164.3 68.3 -
C1 (July 2009) 33,393.3 270 - 6,690.0 74.7 - 5,350.0 60.8 - 920.0 - - 1,121.0 18.2 - 14,470.8 391.1 67.6 8,877.5 233.0 57.7 5,799.1 204.9 - 4,566.1 - - 8,408.4 177.5 145.0 4,404.8 98.5 48.9 79.4 2.5 29.1 - - - 128.6 - - - - -
C2UP (May 2011) 4,250.0 74.7 - 3,370.0 60.8 - - - - 5,430.8 73.7 - 2,372.7 102.5 29.0 1,611.2 66.3 28.9 1,824.2 64.8 - 1,320.1 - - 1,026.9 19.5 240.1 358.7 10.5 118.4 2,313.7 11.6 294.3 2,227.4 7.2 259.9 2,809.9 34.0 1,216.7 2,064.5 - 510.0
C2BTM (May 2011) 31,760.0 485.0 - 29,640.0 394.7 - 28,130.0 515.5 - 12,829.0 190.9 3,354.6
D1 (Feb 2009) 888.7 12.4 1,306.0 1,400.0 367.1 - 1,590.0 93.2 - 780.0 74.6 - 94.6 - -
D3 (May 2007) - 0 - - - - - - - - - - 19.3 - -
D4 (May 2007) - 0 - 120.0 128.5 - 300.0 84.8 - 68.0 56.7 - 96.8 - -
D5 (May 2007) - 0 1,306.0
- 830.0 - 399.9 240.0 149.1 201.5 131.0 59.7 127.5 265.1 - 4.8
Total 34,282.0 282.4 - 45,050.0 1,130.0 399.9 40,490.0 843.4 201.5 30,029.0 706.5 127.5 19,856.6 282.8 3,359.4 16,843.6 493.6 96.5 10,488.7 299.3 86.7 25,600.0 919.8 - 10,615.3 - - 23,360.1 499.4 2,250.7 14,160.2 378.7 999.6 6,475.2 47.7 4,274.2 5,169.8 21.0 1,992.7 6,564.6 34.0 5,091.0 3,858.5 119.0 1,662.1
01 Dec 2015 (SLB)
Flowing#2: 10.3mmscfd
WSO Oct 2013
04-05 Mar 2017 (SLB)
Flowing#2: 5.16mmscfd
24 May 2018 (SLB)
Flowing#1: 6.56mmscfd
04-05 Mar 2017 (SLB)
Flowing#1: 6.46mmscfd
24 May 2018 (SLB)
Flowing#1: 3.85mmscfd
RDT-1P PLT
Zones
02 Feb 2011 (Halliburton)
Flowing#1: 36.17mmscfd
15 Jun 2012 (SLB)
Flowing#3: 29.86mmscfd
08-10 Mar 2013 (SLB)
Flowing#: mmscfd
11 Mar 2015 (SLB)
Flowing#2: 9.81mmscfd
01 Dec 2015 (SLB)
Flowing#1: 24.6mmscfd
23-24 Mar 2016 (SLB)
Flowing#1: 22mmscfd
15 Jun 2012 (SLB)
Flowing#1: 45mmscfd
15 Jun 2012 (SLB)
Flowing#2: 41.8mmscfd
11 Mar 2015 (SLB)
Flowing#1: 18.7mmscfd
23-24 Mar 2016 (SLB)
Flowing#2: 14.87mmscfd
Gas
[Mscfd]
Condy.
[STBD]
Water
[STBD]
Gas
[Mscfd]
Condy.
[STBD]
Water
[STBD]
Gas
[Mscfd]
Condy.
[STBD]
Water
[STBD]
Gas
[Mscfd]
Condy.
[STBD]
Water
[STBD]
Gas
[Mscfd]
Condy.
[STBD]
Water
[STBD]
Gas
[Mscfd]
Condy.
[STBD]
Water
[STBD]
Gas
[Mscfd]
Condy.
[STBD]
Water
[STBD]
Gas
[Mscfd]
Condy.
[STBD]
Water
[STBD]
Gas
[Mscfd]
Condy.
[STBD]
Water
[STBD]
Gas
[Mscfd]
Condy.
[STBD]
Water
[STBD]
Gas
[Mscfd]
Condy.
[STBD]
Water
[STBD]
A0 (Dec 2015) 47.5 - 2,944.6 0.1 - 4,636.0 135.4 - 4,744.5 Minor 1,544.8 Minor 931.7
A0.5 (Mar 2017)
A1 (Mar 2016) 5,437.4 37.9 22.3 5.3 59.0 38.7 7,642.8 158.8 48.9 1,006.1 732.4
A1.5 (Mar 2015) 1,537.3 - 574.0 111.8 - 212.7 0.1 - 531.3 157.3 - 565.8 483.3 388.0
A2 (Dec 2015) N/A - - - - - - - - - - -
A3 (Mar 2015) 2,413.9 - 289.2 - - 96.6 0.7 - 214.5 1,036.3 - 290.5 114.2 193.7
-
B1 (June 2012) 10,510.4 371.7 - 7.2 332.8 - 4.6 104.5 - 564.1 - 645.1 844.6 - 115.4 497.7 - 835.5
B3 (June 2012) 28,111.7 1,058.9 - 20.7 564.5 - 17.0 538.4 - 14,518.4 594.5 1,170.0 9,392.8 335.0 596.0 3,527.2 318.6 1,425.3
C1 (June 2012) 15,118.0 641.6 1,055.1 9.0 561.3 450.6 7.1 563.0 383.3
C2 (June 2012) 5.0 1.0 95.5 0.2 - 14.3 0.1 - 9.6
D1 (May 2011) 204.1 10.4 - 0.5 37.8 15.2 0.3 15.3 9.5
Total 53,949.2 2,083.6 1,150.6 37.6 1,496.4 480.1 29.1 1,221.2 402.4 15,082.5 594.5 1,815.1 10,237.3 335.0 711.3 7,976.1 318.6 3,124.0 5,596.7 37.9 3,276.2 6.3 59.0 5,420.5 8,971.8 158.8 5,649.8 - - 3,148.3 - - 1,858.3
WSO Mar 2016
07 Mar 2017 (SLB)
Flowing#2: 0.71mmscfd
WSO Oct 2013
07 Mar 2017 (SLB)
Flowing#2: 0.5mmscfd
RDT-2P PLT
04 Apr 2016 (SLB)
Flowing#1: 5.66mmscfd
04 Apr 2016 (SLB)
Flowing#2: 6.22mmscfd
04 Apr 2016 (SLB)
Flowing#3: 8.89mmscfd
Zone
12-15 Mar 2013 (SLB)
Flowing#2: 39mmscfd
12-15 Mar 2013 (SLB)
Flowing#3: 28.66mmscfd
04 Mar 2015 (SLB)
Flowing#1: 15mmscfd
04 Mar 2015 (SLB)
Flowing#2: 10.7mmscfd
12-15 Mar 2013 (SLB)
Flowing#1: 50.08mmscfd
01 Dec 2015 (SLB)
Flowing#: 7.944mmscfd

More Related Content

Similar to 1wz Workshop with ZN for Perf B3 Up in RDT-1P in 2022-ver1.pptx

BDC VUB # 150 TTRC modified oct 26_KDK
BDC VUB # 150 TTRC modified oct 26_KDKBDC VUB # 150 TTRC modified oct 26_KDK
BDC VUB # 150 TTRC modified oct 26_KDKKevin Kelley
 
Pushing the limits of TIAM - Achieving well-below 2 degrees scenarios
Pushing the limits of TIAM - Achieving well-below 2 degrees scenariosPushing the limits of TIAM - Achieving well-below 2 degrees scenarios
Pushing the limits of TIAM - Achieving well-below 2 degrees scenariosIEA-ETSAP
 
Cement and CO2: A Victim of Success
Cement and CO2: A Victim of SuccessCement and CO2: A Victim of Success
Cement and CO2: A Victim of SuccessJohn Kline
 
Sea NG - Small Market Gas Project Development
Sea NG - Small Market Gas Project DevelopmentSea NG - Small Market Gas Project Development
Sea NG - Small Market Gas Project DevelopmentLyndon Ward
 
Dalmia Cement Ariyalur_240314_114438.pdf
Dalmia Cement Ariyalur_240314_114438.pdfDalmia Cement Ariyalur_240314_114438.pdf
Dalmia Cement Ariyalur_240314_114438.pdfBlentBulut5
 
CatFT(r) Fischer-Tropsch Process presentation
CatFT(r) Fischer-Tropsch Process presentationCatFT(r) Fischer-Tropsch Process presentation
CatFT(r) Fischer-Tropsch Process presentationThomas Holcombe
 
Field Development Project of E11 drilling dept.ppt
Field Development Project of E11 drilling dept.pptField Development Project of E11 drilling dept.ppt
Field Development Project of E11 drilling dept.pptMUHAMMAD NOMAN KHAN
 
Acer Aspire 4720Z Z01 Rev1A schematic.pdf
Acer Aspire 4720Z Z01 Rev1A schematic.pdfAcer Aspire 4720Z Z01 Rev1A schematic.pdf
Acer Aspire 4720Z Z01 Rev1A schematic.pdfArcangeloDiBattista1
 
Sumie Nakayama - CCS on the global climate agenda
Sumie Nakayama - CCS on the global climate agendaSumie Nakayama - CCS on the global climate agenda
Sumie Nakayama - CCS on the global climate agendaGlobal CCS Institute
 
FY 2022 Consolidated Results
FY 2022 Consolidated ResultsFY 2022 Consolidated Results
FY 2022 Consolidated ResultsSnam
 
GOM decom market reveiw and update mark kaiser, lsu
GOM decom market reveiw and update mark kaiser, lsuGOM decom market reveiw and update mark kaiser, lsu
GOM decom market reveiw and update mark kaiser, lsugomdecom
 
PRES_Dejanovic_et al.pdf
PRES_Dejanovic_et al.pdfPRES_Dejanovic_et al.pdf
PRES_Dejanovic_et al.pdfIgorDejanovic1
 
02_4-Conventional Decline Curve Analysis.ppt
02_4-Conventional Decline Curve Analysis.ppt02_4-Conventional Decline Curve Analysis.ppt
02_4-Conventional Decline Curve Analysis.pptrokur4099
 

Similar to 1wz Workshop with ZN for Perf B3 Up in RDT-1P in 2022-ver1.pptx (20)

BDC VUB # 150 TTRC modified oct 26_KDK
BDC VUB # 150 TTRC modified oct 26_KDKBDC VUB # 150 TTRC modified oct 26_KDK
BDC VUB # 150 TTRC modified oct 26_KDK
 
Pushing the limits of TIAM - Achieving well-below 2 degrees scenarios
Pushing the limits of TIAM - Achieving well-below 2 degrees scenariosPushing the limits of TIAM - Achieving well-below 2 degrees scenarios
Pushing the limits of TIAM - Achieving well-below 2 degrees scenarios
 
Cement and CO2: A Victim of Success
Cement and CO2: A Victim of SuccessCement and CO2: A Victim of Success
Cement and CO2: A Victim of Success
 
Sea NG - Small Market Gas Project Development
Sea NG - Small Market Gas Project DevelopmentSea NG - Small Market Gas Project Development
Sea NG - Small Market Gas Project Development
 
Dalmia Cement Ariyalur_240314_114438.pdf
Dalmia Cement Ariyalur_240314_114438.pdfDalmia Cement Ariyalur_240314_114438.pdf
Dalmia Cement Ariyalur_240314_114438.pdf
 
180 brijesh
180 brijesh180 brijesh
180 brijesh
 
180 brijesh
180 brijesh180 brijesh
180 brijesh
 
CSUR 20150326 FINAL
CSUR 20150326 FINALCSUR 20150326 FINAL
CSUR 20150326 FINAL
 
CatFT(r) Fischer-Tropsch Process presentation
CatFT(r) Fischer-Tropsch Process presentationCatFT(r) Fischer-Tropsch Process presentation
CatFT(r) Fischer-Tropsch Process presentation
 
Field Development Project of E11 drilling dept.ppt
Field Development Project of E11 drilling dept.pptField Development Project of E11 drilling dept.ppt
Field Development Project of E11 drilling dept.ppt
 
Acer Aspire 4720Z Z01 Rev1A schematic.pdf
Acer Aspire 4720Z Z01 Rev1A schematic.pdfAcer Aspire 4720Z Z01 Rev1A schematic.pdf
Acer Aspire 4720Z Z01 Rev1A schematic.pdf
 
Sumie Nakayama - CCS on the global climate agenda
Sumie Nakayama - CCS on the global climate agendaSumie Nakayama - CCS on the global climate agenda
Sumie Nakayama - CCS on the global climate agenda
 
H2P_Energy_Final_Presentation_ENCH_531
H2P_Energy_Final_Presentation_ENCH_531H2P_Energy_Final_Presentation_ENCH_531
H2P_Energy_Final_Presentation_ENCH_531
 
FY 2022 Consolidated Results
FY 2022 Consolidated ResultsFY 2022 Consolidated Results
FY 2022 Consolidated Results
 
GOM decom market reveiw and update mark kaiser, lsu
GOM decom market reveiw and update mark kaiser, lsuGOM decom market reveiw and update mark kaiser, lsu
GOM decom market reveiw and update mark kaiser, lsu
 
Banff Presentation
Banff PresentationBanff Presentation
Banff Presentation
 
Drill.pptx
Drill.pptxDrill.pptx
Drill.pptx
 
PRES_Dejanovic_et al.pdf
PRES_Dejanovic_et al.pdfPRES_Dejanovic_et al.pdf
PRES_Dejanovic_et al.pdf
 
OptiCal & LUMOS Networks
OptiCal & LUMOS NetworksOptiCal & LUMOS Networks
OptiCal & LUMOS Networks
 
02_4-Conventional Decline Curve Analysis.ppt
02_4-Conventional Decline Curve Analysis.ppt02_4-Conventional Decline Curve Analysis.ppt
02_4-Conventional Decline Curve Analysis.ppt
 

Recently uploaded

SLIDESHARE PPT-DECISION MAKING METHODS.pptx
SLIDESHARE PPT-DECISION MAKING METHODS.pptxSLIDESHARE PPT-DECISION MAKING METHODS.pptx
SLIDESHARE PPT-DECISION MAKING METHODS.pptxCHAIRMAN M
 
Electrostatic field in a coaxial transmission line
Electrostatic field in a coaxial transmission lineElectrostatic field in a coaxial transmission line
Electrostatic field in a coaxial transmission lineJulioCesarSalazarHer1
 
E-Commerce Shopping using MERN Stack where different modules are present
E-Commerce Shopping using MERN Stack where different modules are presentE-Commerce Shopping using MERN Stack where different modules are present
E-Commerce Shopping using MERN Stack where different modules are presentjatinraor66
 
The battle for RAG, explore the pros and cons of using KnowledgeGraphs and Ve...
The battle for RAG, explore the pros and cons of using KnowledgeGraphs and Ve...The battle for RAG, explore the pros and cons of using KnowledgeGraphs and Ve...
The battle for RAG, explore the pros and cons of using KnowledgeGraphs and Ve...Roi Lipman
 
"United Nations Park" Site Visit Report.
"United Nations Park" Site  Visit Report."United Nations Park" Site  Visit Report.
"United Nations Park" Site Visit Report.MdManikurRahman
 
Introduction to Arduino Programming: Features of Arduino
Introduction to Arduino Programming: Features of ArduinoIntroduction to Arduino Programming: Features of Arduino
Introduction to Arduino Programming: Features of ArduinoAbhimanyu Sangale
 
Multivibrator and its types defination and usges.pptx
Multivibrator and its types defination and usges.pptxMultivibrator and its types defination and usges.pptx
Multivibrator and its types defination and usges.pptxalijaker017
 
Complex plane, Modulus, Argument, Graphical representation of a complex numbe...
Complex plane, Modulus, Argument, Graphical representation of a complex numbe...Complex plane, Modulus, Argument, Graphical representation of a complex numbe...
Complex plane, Modulus, Argument, Graphical representation of a complex numbe...MohammadAliNayeem
 
Involute of a circle,Square, pentagon,HexagonInvolute_Engineering Drawing.pdf
Involute of a circle,Square, pentagon,HexagonInvolute_Engineering Drawing.pdfInvolute of a circle,Square, pentagon,HexagonInvolute_Engineering Drawing.pdf
Involute of a circle,Square, pentagon,HexagonInvolute_Engineering Drawing.pdfJNTUA
 
Geometric constructions Engineering Drawing.pdf
Geometric constructions Engineering Drawing.pdfGeometric constructions Engineering Drawing.pdf
Geometric constructions Engineering Drawing.pdfJNTUA
 
Operating System chapter 9 (Virtual Memory)
Operating System chapter 9 (Virtual Memory)Operating System chapter 9 (Virtual Memory)
Operating System chapter 9 (Virtual Memory)NareenAsad
 
Instruct Nirmaana 24-Smart and Lean Construction Through Technology.pdf
Instruct Nirmaana 24-Smart and Lean Construction Through Technology.pdfInstruct Nirmaana 24-Smart and Lean Construction Through Technology.pdf
Instruct Nirmaana 24-Smart and Lean Construction Through Technology.pdfEr.Sonali Nasikkar
 
Online crime reporting system project.pdf
Online crime reporting system project.pdfOnline crime reporting system project.pdf
Online crime reporting system project.pdfKamal Acharya
 
ChatGPT Prompt Engineering for project managers.pdf
ChatGPT Prompt Engineering for project managers.pdfChatGPT Prompt Engineering for project managers.pdf
ChatGPT Prompt Engineering for project managers.pdfqasastareekh
 
RM&IPR M5 notes.pdfResearch Methodolgy & Intellectual Property Rights Series 5
RM&IPR M5 notes.pdfResearch Methodolgy & Intellectual Property Rights Series 5RM&IPR M5 notes.pdfResearch Methodolgy & Intellectual Property Rights Series 5
RM&IPR M5 notes.pdfResearch Methodolgy & Intellectual Property Rights Series 5T.D. Shashikala
 
Fabrication Of Automatic Star Delta Starter Using Relay And GSM Module By Utk...
Fabrication Of Automatic Star Delta Starter Using Relay And GSM Module By Utk...Fabrication Of Automatic Star Delta Starter Using Relay And GSM Module By Utk...
Fabrication Of Automatic Star Delta Starter Using Relay And GSM Module By Utk...ShivamTiwari995432
 
15-Minute City: A Completely New Horizon
15-Minute City: A Completely New Horizon15-Minute City: A Completely New Horizon
15-Minute City: A Completely New HorizonMorshed Ahmed Rahath
 
Intelligent Agents, A discovery on How A Rational Agent Acts
Intelligent Agents, A discovery on How A Rational Agent ActsIntelligent Agents, A discovery on How A Rational Agent Acts
Intelligent Agents, A discovery on How A Rational Agent ActsSheetal Jain
 
BRAKING SYSTEM IN INDIAN RAILWAY AutoCAD DRAWING
BRAKING SYSTEM IN INDIAN RAILWAY AutoCAD DRAWINGBRAKING SYSTEM IN INDIAN RAILWAY AutoCAD DRAWING
BRAKING SYSTEM IN INDIAN RAILWAY AutoCAD DRAWINGKOUSTAV SARKAR
 
Seismic Hazard Assessment Software in Python by Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Seismic Hazard Assessment Software in Python by Prof. Dr. Costas SachpazisSeismic Hazard Assessment Software in Python by Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Seismic Hazard Assessment Software in Python by Prof. Dr. Costas SachpazisDr.Costas Sachpazis
 

Recently uploaded (20)

SLIDESHARE PPT-DECISION MAKING METHODS.pptx
SLIDESHARE PPT-DECISION MAKING METHODS.pptxSLIDESHARE PPT-DECISION MAKING METHODS.pptx
SLIDESHARE PPT-DECISION MAKING METHODS.pptx
 
Electrostatic field in a coaxial transmission line
Electrostatic field in a coaxial transmission lineElectrostatic field in a coaxial transmission line
Electrostatic field in a coaxial transmission line
 
E-Commerce Shopping using MERN Stack where different modules are present
E-Commerce Shopping using MERN Stack where different modules are presentE-Commerce Shopping using MERN Stack where different modules are present
E-Commerce Shopping using MERN Stack where different modules are present
 
The battle for RAG, explore the pros and cons of using KnowledgeGraphs and Ve...
The battle for RAG, explore the pros and cons of using KnowledgeGraphs and Ve...The battle for RAG, explore the pros and cons of using KnowledgeGraphs and Ve...
The battle for RAG, explore the pros and cons of using KnowledgeGraphs and Ve...
 
"United Nations Park" Site Visit Report.
"United Nations Park" Site  Visit Report."United Nations Park" Site  Visit Report.
"United Nations Park" Site Visit Report.
 
Introduction to Arduino Programming: Features of Arduino
Introduction to Arduino Programming: Features of ArduinoIntroduction to Arduino Programming: Features of Arduino
Introduction to Arduino Programming: Features of Arduino
 
Multivibrator and its types defination and usges.pptx
Multivibrator and its types defination and usges.pptxMultivibrator and its types defination and usges.pptx
Multivibrator and its types defination and usges.pptx
 
Complex plane, Modulus, Argument, Graphical representation of a complex numbe...
Complex plane, Modulus, Argument, Graphical representation of a complex numbe...Complex plane, Modulus, Argument, Graphical representation of a complex numbe...
Complex plane, Modulus, Argument, Graphical representation of a complex numbe...
 
Involute of a circle,Square, pentagon,HexagonInvolute_Engineering Drawing.pdf
Involute of a circle,Square, pentagon,HexagonInvolute_Engineering Drawing.pdfInvolute of a circle,Square, pentagon,HexagonInvolute_Engineering Drawing.pdf
Involute of a circle,Square, pentagon,HexagonInvolute_Engineering Drawing.pdf
 
Geometric constructions Engineering Drawing.pdf
Geometric constructions Engineering Drawing.pdfGeometric constructions Engineering Drawing.pdf
Geometric constructions Engineering Drawing.pdf
 
Operating System chapter 9 (Virtual Memory)
Operating System chapter 9 (Virtual Memory)Operating System chapter 9 (Virtual Memory)
Operating System chapter 9 (Virtual Memory)
 
Instruct Nirmaana 24-Smart and Lean Construction Through Technology.pdf
Instruct Nirmaana 24-Smart and Lean Construction Through Technology.pdfInstruct Nirmaana 24-Smart and Lean Construction Through Technology.pdf
Instruct Nirmaana 24-Smart and Lean Construction Through Technology.pdf
 
Online crime reporting system project.pdf
Online crime reporting system project.pdfOnline crime reporting system project.pdf
Online crime reporting system project.pdf
 
ChatGPT Prompt Engineering for project managers.pdf
ChatGPT Prompt Engineering for project managers.pdfChatGPT Prompt Engineering for project managers.pdf
ChatGPT Prompt Engineering for project managers.pdf
 
RM&IPR M5 notes.pdfResearch Methodolgy & Intellectual Property Rights Series 5
RM&IPR M5 notes.pdfResearch Methodolgy & Intellectual Property Rights Series 5RM&IPR M5 notes.pdfResearch Methodolgy & Intellectual Property Rights Series 5
RM&IPR M5 notes.pdfResearch Methodolgy & Intellectual Property Rights Series 5
 
Fabrication Of Automatic Star Delta Starter Using Relay And GSM Module By Utk...
Fabrication Of Automatic Star Delta Starter Using Relay And GSM Module By Utk...Fabrication Of Automatic Star Delta Starter Using Relay And GSM Module By Utk...
Fabrication Of Automatic Star Delta Starter Using Relay And GSM Module By Utk...
 
15-Minute City: A Completely New Horizon
15-Minute City: A Completely New Horizon15-Minute City: A Completely New Horizon
15-Minute City: A Completely New Horizon
 
Intelligent Agents, A discovery on How A Rational Agent Acts
Intelligent Agents, A discovery on How A Rational Agent ActsIntelligent Agents, A discovery on How A Rational Agent Acts
Intelligent Agents, A discovery on How A Rational Agent Acts
 
BRAKING SYSTEM IN INDIAN RAILWAY AutoCAD DRAWING
BRAKING SYSTEM IN INDIAN RAILWAY AutoCAD DRAWINGBRAKING SYSTEM IN INDIAN RAILWAY AutoCAD DRAWING
BRAKING SYSTEM IN INDIAN RAILWAY AutoCAD DRAWING
 
Seismic Hazard Assessment Software in Python by Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Seismic Hazard Assessment Software in Python by Prof. Dr. Costas SachpazisSeismic Hazard Assessment Software in Python by Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Seismic Hazard Assessment Software in Python by Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis
 

1wz Workshop with ZN for Perf B3 Up in RDT-1P in 2022-ver1.pptx

  • 1. RDT-1P B3 Upper Reservoir Perforation KNOC Operating Office in HCMC, Vietnam
  • 2. Block Overview 2 Block 11-2 • Location: 320km from Vung Tau • Basin: Nam Con Son • Operator: KNOC • KC (75%), PVEP (25%) • First Gas : 25th Dec., 2006
  • 3. Production Enhancement 3 Objectives • To increase gas flow rate and recovery of RD/RDT gas field • To make decision for additional perforation interval • To evaluate post perforation job Terms • January ~ September 2022 Budget • In-house Work Scope • Petrophysical review • GWC review • Review previous PLT and perforation effects • RDT water production history matching • Forecasting the perforation effects • Depth matching of B-3 Upper zone • Post job evaluation for additional RDT perforation 2022 Work Program Budget (K USD) Firm Contingent Production Enhancement - - • RDT additional perforation - -
  • 5. IOI Properties 5 RDT-2P RDT-1RX RDT-1P • Net Pay : 2.48 mTVD • Av. Phie : 14.8% • Av. Sw : 49.8% • Av. Vcl : 24.9% • Av. Klog-Core : 20.2 mD B-3 Top Depth Structure Map 6.75 in RDT-1P Additional Perforation Interval 1.27 MMscfd 42 stbd
  • 6. IOI (Interval Of Interesting, B-3 Upper) 6 Perforated Perforated
  • 7. IOI (Interval Of Interesting, B-3 Upper) 7 RDT-1P RDT-2P
  • 8. IOI (Interval Of Interesting, B-3 Upper) 8 Perforated
  • 9. Sw Intersections of B3 Reservoir 9 N S W E RDT-1P RDT-1P RDT-1X RDT-2P RDT-1X RDT-2P
  • 10. GWC and B3 Perforation Intervals 10 <B3 Depth Map> GWC GWC W E NW SE Perf. Perf. Perf. Perf. RDT-1P RDT-2P RDT-1P RDT-2P
  • 11. Seal Capability btw B3 Up. & Lw. 11 B3 C1 C2 Max. 0.51 Vcl Max. 0.94 Vcl Max. 0.70 Vcl ?
  • 12. 2 Scenarios of Production Forecast 12 #1 : Barrier Case (Forecast) #2 : No Barrier Case (Forecast) Perforated Seal U U L C - Effective Porosity : < < - Permeability : < < C L U C L Seal No Seal ? No Seal 5% 7% 2% Water Conning Initial GWC
  • 13. Producing Zone of RDT Wells 13 Well RDT-2P RDT-1P Well Test Date November, 2021 Gas MMscfd 1.77 3.87 Producing Zones (PLT) PLT Date Mar 2017 May 2018 Contribution Gas (MMscf/d) Contribution Gas (MMscf/d) A0 84% 1.49 A1 13% 0.23 A1.5 2% 0.04 A2 A3 1% 0.02 17% 0.66 B2 13% 0.50 B3 44% (2015 PLT) 3.53 (2015 PLT) 33% 1.28 C1 1% 0.04 C2 36% 1.39 RDT-1P RDT-2P 144% 100% A0 A0.5 A1 A1-5 A2 A3 B1 B3 C1 upper C1 lower C2 D1a A 3 B 2 B 3 C 1 C 2U C 2L D 1b D 3 D 4 D 5U D 5L Dec 2015 Mar 2017 Mar 2016 Mar 2015 Dec 2015 Mar 2015 Jun 2012 Jun 2012 Jun 2012 Jun 2012 Mar 2016 Dec 2018 Mar 2015 Mar 2016 Mar 2015 Jul 2009 May 2011
  • 14. Production History Of RDT Wells 14 4 130 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 BBL/D MMSCF/D RDT-1P Production Gas Condensate 2 12 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 BBL/D MMSCF/D RDT-2P Production Gas Condensate C1+D1+D3+D4+D5 C1+C2+D1+D3+D4+D5 C1+C2UP A3+B3+C1+C2UP A3+B2+B3+C1+C2UP B1+B3+C1+C2+D1 B1+B3 A1.5+A3+B1+B3 A0+A1+A1.5+A2+A3 A0+A1+A1.5+A2+A3+B1+B3
  • 15. B3 Production History (RDT-2P) 15 PLT (12 Mar 2013) 52% PLT(04 Mar 2015) 96% PLT(01 Dec 2015) ※ (Total Production of RDT-2P) × (Contribution Ratio of B3 by PLT) = B3 Production B3 Perforation Push down HEX Plug to below B3 (Dec, 2018) A0 A0.5 A1 A1-5 A2 A3 B1 B3 C1 upper C1 lower C2 D1a E1 F1 0.56 MMSCF/D 3.69 BBL/D 30.5% (=44%/144%) PLT (07 Mar 2017) 44% (B3/RDT-2P Ratio) HEX Plug Set @ above B1 (due to 1,425 bblw/d)
  • 16. B3 Production History (RDT-1P) 16 PLT(01 Dec 2015) PLT(23 Mar 2016) PLT(04 Mar 2017) PLT(24 May 2018) 1.27 MMSCF/D 42 BBL/D 40% 39% 34% 32% (B3/RDT-1P Ratio) ※ (Total Production of RDT-1P) × (Contribution Ratio of B3 by PLT) = B3 Production B3 Perforation A 3 B 2 B 3 C 1 C 2U C 2L D 1b D 3 D 4 D 5U D 5L
  • 17. #1 : Barrier Case #2 : No Barrier Case 2 Scenarios of Production Forecast 17 Perforated Artificial barrier B3 Simulation grid B3 Simulation grid Proposed perf. B3 Up.
  • 18. B3 Upper interval Selection 18 GWC@2869mTVDss Proposed B3 Up Proposed Perf. Interval 3921.03-3925.30 mMD Dec 2015 Simulation Grid Fine Grid
  • 19. B3 Production Recovery Review 19 RDT-1P Perforation Zone 2021 Model GIIP, Bcf Top Perf. mTVDSS/ mMD Bottom perf. mTVDSS/ mMD Perf. Length, mMD RFDP Cumulative B3 production by Simulation (Bcf) Cumulative B3 production by PLT allocation (Bcf) Recovery (%) GWC, mTVDss B-3 41.46 (B3 Upper) 2837.29/ 3921.03 (B3 Upper) 2839.81/ 3925.30 4.27 2869 20.06 26.68 48.38 (Sim.)/ 64.35 (PLT) (B3 Lower) 2848.02/ 3939.80 (B3 Lower) 2852.56/ 3947.80 8.0
  • 20. RD/RDT Reservoir Model Update (2021) 20
  • 21. RDT-1P History Matching 21 Gas Rate Cond. Rate BHP Water Rate Water Cut THP
  • 22. RDT-2P History Matching 22 Gas Rate Cond. Rate BHP Water Rate Water Cut THP
  • 23. Remaining Potential (B-3 Upper) 23 #1 : Barrier Case B3 Artificial barrier Simulation grid Proposed perf. B3 Up. B-3 Gas Production Rate • No B-3 Upper perf • With B-3 Upper perf B-3 Condensate Production Rate • No B-3 Upper perf • With B-3 Upper perf Av. 29.60 bbld increased Production Forecasting Av. 0.85 mmscfd increased YEAR 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Total Gas (bcf/yr) 0.19 0.43 0.31 0.23 0.17 0.14 0.11 1.57 Condy (mbbl/yr) 6.84 15.31 10.60 7.92 5.51 4.36 3.34 53.88
  • 24. Remaining Potential (B-3 Upper) 24 #2 : No Barrier Case Simulation grid B3 Proposed perf. B3 Up. B-3 Gas Production Rate • No B-3 Upper perf • With B-3 Upper perf B-3 Condensate Production Rate • No B-3 Upper perf • With B-3 Upper perf Av. 5.23 bbld increased Production Forecasting Av. 0.16 mmscfd increased YEAR 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Total Gas (bcf/yr) 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.31 Condy (mbbl/yr) 2.36 2.38 1.34 1.08 1.01 0.93 0.72 9.80
  • 25. Simple Economics (Barrier Case) 25 • Cost - During PLT work - 79,689 $US (2017) - No additional OPEX • Pay back : 1 Month • NCF : 7.64 $MM B-3 Gas Production Rate • No B-3 Upper perf • With B-3 Upper perf B-3 Condensate Production Rate • No B-3 Upper perf • With B-3 Upper perf Av. 29.60 bbld increased Production Forecasting Av. 0.85 mmscfd increased
  • 26. Simple Economics (No Barrier Case) 26 B-3 Gas Production Rate • No B-3 Upper perf • With B-3 Upper perf B-3 Condensate Production Rate • No B-3 Upper perf • With B-3 Upper perf Av. 5.23 bbld increased Av. 0.16 mmscfd increased • Cost - During PLT work - 79,689 $US (2017) - No additional OPEX • Pay back : 3 Months • NCF : 1.34 $MM
  • 28. RDT-1P History Matching 28 Gas Rate BHP Water Rate THP
  • 29. RDT-2P History Matching 29 Gas Rate BHP Water Rate THP
  • 30. Remaining Potential (B-3 Upper) 30 #2 : No Barrier Case Simulation grid RFDP 2012 B3 Proposed perf. B3 Up. B-3 Gas Production Rate • No B-3 Upper perf • With B-3 Upper perf B-3 Condensate Production Rate • No B-3 Upper perf • With B-3 Upper perf Av. 35.17 bbld increased Production Forecasting Av. 1.15 mmscfd increased YEAR 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Total Gas (bcf/yr) 0.18 0.44 0.41 0.39 0.36 0.34 0.29 2.42 Condy (mbbl/yr) 5.71 13.81 12.71 11.78 10.85 9.93 8.64 73.43
  • 31. 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 TOTAL Gas (bcf/yr) 0.18 0.44 0.41 0.39 0.36 0.34 0.29 2.42 Cond (mbbl/yr) 5.71 13.81 12.71 11.78 10.85 9.93 8.64 73.43 Netback Gas (80% applied, $/mcf) 2.25 2.30 2.34 2.39 2.44 2.48 2.53 Cond ($/bbl) 102.88 89.71 82.64 53.10 54.16 55.25 56.35 CAPEX ($MM) 0.16 - - - - - - OPEX ($MM) - - - - - - - Gas ($MM) 0.40 1.02 0.97 0.93 0.88 0.83 0.75 5.78 Cond ($MM) 0.59 1.24 1.05 0.63 0.59 0.55 0.49 5.13 Gas ($MM) 0.16 - - - - - - 0.16 Cond ($MM) - - - - - - - - NCF $MM 0.83 2.25 2.02 1.55 1.47 1.38 1.23 10.75 Cash-Out Year Production Unit Price COST Cash-In Simple Economics (No Barrier Case) 31 • Cost - During PLT work - 79,689 $US (2017) - No additional OPEX • Pay back : 1 Months • NCF : 10.75 $MM B-3 Gas Production Rate • No B-3 Upper perf • With B-3 Upper perf B-3 Condensate Production Rate • No B-3 Upper perf • With B-3 Upper perf Av. 35.17 bbld increased Av. 1.15 mmscfd increased
  • 32. Remaining Potential (B-3 Upper) 32 #1 : Barrier Case B3 Artificial barrier Simulation grid RFDP 2012 Proposed perf. B3 Up. Production Forecasting B-3 Gas Production Rate • No B-3 Upper perf • With B-3 Upper perf B-3 Condensate Production Rate • No B-3 Upper perf • With B-3 Upper perf Very minor effect Very minor effect
  • 34. Rf) Process, Utility Diagram 34
  • 35. B3 Upper interval Selection (RFDP2012) 35
  • 36. RFPD-2012 Model Update (Barrier case in B3) RDT wells History Matching Effect 36
  • 37. RDT-1P History Matching 37 Gas Rate BHP Water Rate THP
  • 38. RDT-2P History Matching 38 Gas Rate BHP Water Rate THP
  • 39. 39 Gas [Mscfd] Condy. [STBD] Water [STBD] Gas [Mscfd] Condy. [STBD] Water [STBD] Gas [Mscfd] Condy. [STBD] Water [STBD] Gas [Mscfd] Condy. [STBD] Water [STBD] Gas [Mscfd] Condy. [STBD] Water [STBD] Gas [Mscfd] Condy. [STBD] Water [STBD] Gas [Mscfd] Condy. [STBD] Water [STBD] Gas [Mscfd] Condy. [STBD] Water [STBD] Gas [Mscfd] Condy. [STBD] Water [STBD] Gas [Mscfd] Condy. [STBD] Water [STBD] Gas [Mscfd] Condy. [STBD] Water [STBD] Gas [Mscfd] Condy. [STBD] Water [STBD] Gas [Mscfd] Condy. [STBD] Water [STBD] Gas [Mscfd] Condy. [STBD] Water [STBD] Gas [Mscfd] Condy. [STBD] Water [STBD] A3 (Mar 2015) 7,818.6 283.5 - 4,121.4 - - - 4,725.2 128.6 1,769.5 2,413.1 98.8 790.5 1,083.9 11.6 3,836.8 681.6 4.7 1,652.5 1,189.6 - 3,855.1 467.2 50.7 1,149.5 B2 (Mar 2016) 803.4 8.0 15.2 202.6 2.5 5.3 353.3 - 19.1 162.5 - 2.6 B3 (Mar 2015) 10,158.2 366.7 - 8,850.6 - - 9,199.6 173.8 96.2 6,983.5 170.9 41.8 2,194.7 14.1 98.7 2,058.2 6.6 75.1 2,083.4 - - 1,164.3 68.3 - C1 (July 2009) 33,393.3 270 - 6,690.0 74.7 - 5,350.0 60.8 - 920.0 - - 1,121.0 18.2 - 14,470.8 391.1 67.6 8,877.5 233.0 57.7 5,799.1 204.9 - 4,566.1 - - 8,408.4 177.5 145.0 4,404.8 98.5 48.9 79.4 2.5 29.1 - - - 128.6 - - - - - C2UP (May 2011) 4,250.0 74.7 - 3,370.0 60.8 - - - - 5,430.8 73.7 - 2,372.7 102.5 29.0 1,611.2 66.3 28.9 1,824.2 64.8 - 1,320.1 - - 1,026.9 19.5 240.1 358.7 10.5 118.4 2,313.7 11.6 294.3 2,227.4 7.2 259.9 2,809.9 34.0 1,216.7 2,064.5 - 510.0 C2BTM (May 2011) 31,760.0 485.0 - 29,640.0 394.7 - 28,130.0 515.5 - 12,829.0 190.9 3,354.6 D1 (Feb 2009) 888.7 12.4 1,306.0 1,400.0 367.1 - 1,590.0 93.2 - 780.0 74.6 - 94.6 - - D3 (May 2007) - 0 - - - - - - - - - - 19.3 - - D4 (May 2007) - 0 - 120.0 128.5 - 300.0 84.8 - 68.0 56.7 - 96.8 - - D5 (May 2007) - 0 1,306.0 - 830.0 - 399.9 240.0 149.1 201.5 131.0 59.7 127.5 265.1 - 4.8 Total 34,282.0 282.4 - 45,050.0 1,130.0 399.9 40,490.0 843.4 201.5 30,029.0 706.5 127.5 19,856.6 282.8 3,359.4 16,843.6 493.6 96.5 10,488.7 299.3 86.7 25,600.0 919.8 - 10,615.3 - - 23,360.1 499.4 2,250.7 14,160.2 378.7 999.6 6,475.2 47.7 4,274.2 5,169.8 21.0 1,992.7 6,564.6 34.0 5,091.0 3,858.5 119.0 1,662.1 01 Dec 2015 (SLB) Flowing#2: 10.3mmscfd WSO Oct 2013 04-05 Mar 2017 (SLB) Flowing#2: 5.16mmscfd 24 May 2018 (SLB) Flowing#1: 6.56mmscfd 04-05 Mar 2017 (SLB) Flowing#1: 6.46mmscfd 24 May 2018 (SLB) Flowing#1: 3.85mmscfd RDT-1P PLT Zones 02 Feb 2011 (Halliburton) Flowing#1: 36.17mmscfd 15 Jun 2012 (SLB) Flowing#3: 29.86mmscfd 08-10 Mar 2013 (SLB) Flowing#: mmscfd 11 Mar 2015 (SLB) Flowing#2: 9.81mmscfd 01 Dec 2015 (SLB) Flowing#1: 24.6mmscfd 23-24 Mar 2016 (SLB) Flowing#1: 22mmscfd 15 Jun 2012 (SLB) Flowing#1: 45mmscfd 15 Jun 2012 (SLB) Flowing#2: 41.8mmscfd 11 Mar 2015 (SLB) Flowing#1: 18.7mmscfd 23-24 Mar 2016 (SLB) Flowing#2: 14.87mmscfd Gas [Mscfd] Condy. [STBD] Water [STBD] Gas [Mscfd] Condy. [STBD] Water [STBD] Gas [Mscfd] Condy. [STBD] Water [STBD] Gas [Mscfd] Condy. [STBD] Water [STBD] Gas [Mscfd] Condy. [STBD] Water [STBD] Gas [Mscfd] Condy. [STBD] Water [STBD] Gas [Mscfd] Condy. [STBD] Water [STBD] Gas [Mscfd] Condy. [STBD] Water [STBD] Gas [Mscfd] Condy. [STBD] Water [STBD] Gas [Mscfd] Condy. [STBD] Water [STBD] Gas [Mscfd] Condy. [STBD] Water [STBD] A0 (Dec 2015) 47.5 - 2,944.6 0.1 - 4,636.0 135.4 - 4,744.5 Minor 1,544.8 Minor 931.7 A0.5 (Mar 2017) A1 (Mar 2016) 5,437.4 37.9 22.3 5.3 59.0 38.7 7,642.8 158.8 48.9 1,006.1 732.4 A1.5 (Mar 2015) 1,537.3 - 574.0 111.8 - 212.7 0.1 - 531.3 157.3 - 565.8 483.3 388.0 A2 (Dec 2015) N/A - - - - - - - - - - - A3 (Mar 2015) 2,413.9 - 289.2 - - 96.6 0.7 - 214.5 1,036.3 - 290.5 114.2 193.7 - B1 (June 2012) 10,510.4 371.7 - 7.2 332.8 - 4.6 104.5 - 564.1 - 645.1 844.6 - 115.4 497.7 - 835.5 B3 (June 2012) 28,111.7 1,058.9 - 20.7 564.5 - 17.0 538.4 - 14,518.4 594.5 1,170.0 9,392.8 335.0 596.0 3,527.2 318.6 1,425.3 C1 (June 2012) 15,118.0 641.6 1,055.1 9.0 561.3 450.6 7.1 563.0 383.3 C2 (June 2012) 5.0 1.0 95.5 0.2 - 14.3 0.1 - 9.6 D1 (May 2011) 204.1 10.4 - 0.5 37.8 15.2 0.3 15.3 9.5 Total 53,949.2 2,083.6 1,150.6 37.6 1,496.4 480.1 29.1 1,221.2 402.4 15,082.5 594.5 1,815.1 10,237.3 335.0 711.3 7,976.1 318.6 3,124.0 5,596.7 37.9 3,276.2 6.3 59.0 5,420.5 8,971.8 158.8 5,649.8 - - 3,148.3 - - 1,858.3 WSO Mar 2016 07 Mar 2017 (SLB) Flowing#2: 0.71mmscfd WSO Oct 2013 07 Mar 2017 (SLB) Flowing#2: 0.5mmscfd RDT-2P PLT 04 Apr 2016 (SLB) Flowing#1: 5.66mmscfd 04 Apr 2016 (SLB) Flowing#2: 6.22mmscfd 04 Apr 2016 (SLB) Flowing#3: 8.89mmscfd Zone 12-15 Mar 2013 (SLB) Flowing#2: 39mmscfd 12-15 Mar 2013 (SLB) Flowing#3: 28.66mmscfd 04 Mar 2015 (SLB) Flowing#1: 15mmscfd 04 Mar 2015 (SLB) Flowing#2: 10.7mmscfd 12-15 Mar 2013 (SLB) Flowing#1: 50.08mmscfd 01 Dec 2015 (SLB) Flowing#: 7.944mmscfd