Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
FAO in action: Working with farmers to identify and implement climate-smart agriculture
1. FAO in action
Working with farmers to
identify and implement
climate-smart agriculture
Event: Climate-smart agriculture advantage –
better returns for smallholders
UNFCCC, SBSTA 9 June 2015
Kaisa Karttunen
3. Global concept, local actions
• CSA is an approach, not an agricultural practice or
system per se.
• CSA is location-specific: Identifies and combines the most
suitable and sustainable practices and solutions for the
local economic, environmental and social circumstances.
• CSA applies across scales: From national to local level, and
from farmers to policy makers.
• CSA is cross-sectoral: Including all agricultural sub-sectors
(crop and livestock production, fisheries and aquaculture,
and forestry).
• CSA implementation and upscaling need a suitable
enabling environment, including policies and support structures.
5. MICCA: Work with smallholder farmers
in Kenya & Tanzania
Key aspects
• Conducting participatory situation
analysis with farmers to identify the
potential CSA practices
• Testing how smallholders can
contribute to climate change
mitigation while improving their food
production, resilience and livelihoods.
• Linking research, practice and policy
for effective planning and upscaling of
CSA.
6. In Kenya
Improving productivity in integrated crop-livestock
farming system improved fodder, pasture
management, agroforestry and biogas to increase
productivity and reduce the climate change
“footprint” of dairy production.
In Tanzania
Combining conservation agriculture practices with
agroforestry, improved cook-stoves, and soil and
water conservation to reduce burning and erosion,
decrease deforestation and improve livelihoods.
MICCA: CSA Practices in Kenya
& Tanzania
7. MICCA: Analysis by CSA objective
Food
security
Crop yield
Farmer
livelihoods
Adaptation
Rainfall
use
efficiency
Yield
stability
Mitigation
GHG
emissions
Carbon in
biomass
and soil
Land use
changes
S
y
n
e
r
gi
e
s
8. Ethiopia: Toward climate-smart agriculture
• Identification, testing, demonstration and dissemination of
locally relevant sets of adaptation practices through land and
water management
• Rehabilitation of degraded lands, reforestation, water
harvesting, water use efficiency, livelihood diversification and
capacity building
• Implemented through the government on low and high lands
• 1 000 households benefited with impacts on food security, soil
fertility improvements, better water management and
increased resilience.
9. Projects for climate resilience of
farmers and pastoralists in Africa
• In 7 countries: Mali, Angola, Mozambique, Niger, Burkina
Faso, Uganda and Senegal
• Planning and monitoring climate change adaptation
activities with farmers based on agroecosystem
approach integrating crop, livestock, natural resources
management and policy work.
• Using the self-evaluation and holistic
assessment of climate resilience of
farmers and pastoralists (SHARP) tool
• Holistic
• Farmer and herder centred-approach
• Focus in participation, flexibility and learning
www.fao.org/agriculture/crops/thematic-sitemap/theme/spi/sharp/
10. Agroforestry system in Kilimanjaro
By building on indigenous knowledge of local people
• Food and income: improved via conversion to certified
organic coffee farming; introduction of vanilla as a high value
cash crop; and introduction of trout aquaculture along the
irrigation canals
• Adaptation: Rehabilitation of the irrigation system to reduce
water loss and to cope with longer dry seasons due to climate
change; training in sustainable land management.
• Mitigation: Sustainably managed “Kihamba” system increases
carbon storage.
11. China: Sustainable grazing for better
livelihoods
• Improving moisture and nutrient retention in soils also
increases productivity and builds resilience to climate
change.
• Complementary measures – improved feeding, winter
housing, post-farm processing and marketing activities –
provide economic returns to smallholder herders and
generate additional benefits.
• Restoration of degraded grasslands
resulting in substantial carbon
sequestration: 3 tCO2 per hectare
of grassland each year over the
next 20 years
13. Conclusions from the field
1. Selecting CSA practices based on
• Agroecological and socio-economic situation analysis
• Farmers’ participation in the identification process
• Site-specific assessments of the productivity, adaptation &
mitigation benefits, adoption barriers & incentives, and effects on
food security, income and livelihoods.
2. CSA works in practice
• Often more synergies than trade-offs between food security,
adaptation and emission reductions and removals.
3. Implementation and up-scaling of CSA practices considering
• Biophysical and socio-economic factors
• Farming systems and climate impact and risks
• Availability of and access to labour, land and water
• Institutional and policy environment
• Incentives and support for up-front investment costs.
14. Key messages
1. Farmers must receive food
security and livelihood
benefits of CSA – merging
climate change and
development goals
2. Adoption of CSA practices is highly influenced by trainings
and farmer-to-farmer learning – sustainable extension
and information sharing approaches are key
3. Important for adoption: Incentive mechanisms,
addressing barriers and involving local decision makers
4. CSA needs a supportive policy and institutional
environment
5. CSA has a gender dimension.