1) There are two types of summative assessments: those that assess rote knowledge skills and those that assess higher-level thinking skills.
2) Both types of summative assessments are important and have valid uses - rote knowledge assessments evaluate basic learning while higher-level assessments evaluate skills like analysis and problem-solving.
3) High stakes testing to assess rote knowledge on a national scale is controversial, as some argue it leads to teaching to the test without increasing actual learning, while others believe it provides accountability.
How to Manage Notification Preferences in the Odoo 17
Edu 673 week 3 dq 2 summative assessment(ash course)
1. EDU 673 Week 3 DQ 2
Summative
Assessment(Ash Course)
buy here
http://finishedexams.com/homework_tex
t.php?cat=4670
www.finishedexams.com
Immediate access to
solutions
for ENTIRE COURSES,
FINAL EXAMS and
HOMEWORKS “RATED A+"
- Without Registration!
2. EDU 673 Week 3 DQ 2 Summative Assessment(Ash Course)
There are two types of summative assessments, those that assess rote-knowledge
skills and those that assess higher-level executive functions. Using the
information in your text and from your own educational experience, develop an
argument that supports the use of both types of summative assessments. Explain
and defend the appropriate use of each type of assessment. Finally, express your
opinion on the use of high stakes testing (tests attached to funding) to assess
rote-knowledge skills on a national scale. Is the assessment valid? Is it
appropriate? Does it increase student learning?
