2. Introduction
» Emergency Response Centre (ERC)
National 112 Emergency Call Handling and Fire Dispatch
Head Organization – Fire and Rescue Department at MoI
» Tadas Maroščikas
ERC‘s Deputy Director IT & Operations
EENA Operations Committee Vice-Chair for 2016
Co-Author of EENA case study document “eCall implementation in
Lithuania”
» eCall compatibility (EN 16072, EN 16062)
since Nov. 2015
» AML/ELS Android handset location compatibility
since Nov. 2016
» Timing Advance/Round Trip Time Network-based mobile caller location
Since Jan. 2017 2
3. PSAPs – voice & SMS links
3
Klaipėda PSAP
60 call taker/fire
dispatcher terminals
Alytus Fire CCC
7 fire dispatcher
terminals
Vilnius PSAP
60 call taker/fire
dispatcher terminals
Fixed
Mobile
Fixed
Mobile
Mobile
Mobile
Mobile
Mobile
5. ERC Numbers in 2016 v. 2015
» Total of 112 voice call contacts – 3.295.508 (↓7,6%);
» Answered calls – 2.484.958 (↓5,9%);
» Abandoned calls (over 5 sec.) – 114.223 (↓33%)
» Total of call transfers/dispatches – 996.914 (↑4%);
Police – 527.956 (53%, ↑3,9%);
Ambulance – 412.685 (41%, ↑13%);
Fire & Rescue – 33.964 (3,4%, ↓8,4%);
Environmental – 11.135 (1%, ↑8,4%);
Other – 11.162 (1%, ↑87%).
» Total of 112 SMSs received (excluding AML/ELS)– 38.290 (↓32,5%):
Real responses – 240 (↑79%);
» Total of contacts via 112 App (GPIS 112) – 2.999 (↑30,3%); :
Voice contacts – 299 (↑63,4%);
Text contacts – 2.700 (↑27,4%);
Real responses – 56 (↑180%). 5
6. PSAP AML/ELS deployment
» European Commission, project „HELP 112“;
» Task – Pilot project on the design,
implementation and execution of the transfer
of GNSS data during an E112 call to the public
service answering point (PSAP);
» Lithuanian 112 PSAP side upgrade cost –
€50.000;
» Deployed in 6 months.
6
7. Customization
» Transport via SMS (Text & Data);
» Existing 112 SMS links with MNOs used;
» No HTTPS POST, possible in the future;
» Battery level –≥2%;
» Time Delta – 20 sec. after call start;
» Numbers – 112, 101, 011, 102, 022, 911.
7
11. AML/ELS SMS delivery times
11
Before 15 s, 3%
Between 15 s and 30 s,
65%
Between 30 s and 60 s,
11%
Between 60 s and 120
s, 9%
Between 120 s and
600 s, 9%
Longer than 600 s, 3%
12. What we noticed
12
» AML/ELS helps to improve/quicken response;
» Location SMSs are received fast enough to timely
complement response procedures;
» GNSS-based locations are most precise, accurate and
reliable;
» “No location” marked SMSs may contain valid
location coordinates;
» Certain parameters may be missing in AML/ELS
string;
» Wi-Fi-based locations should be taken more carefully;
» Investigate SMS delivery delays/failures with MNOs
to make it even more reliable.
13. Recommendations for AML/ELS
13
» GO FOR IT!
» Meet MNOs in your country;
» Meet other PSAPs in your country;
» Contact Google (Specs, Thunderbird);
» Choose location delivery transport (SMS, HTTPS
POST or both);
» Setup SMS connections into „Transceiver“ mode;
» Make notifications to call takers of handset
location received;
» Train call takers and dispatchers.
14. Thank You All!
AML/ELS will trace you down to mushroom...
Which we‘re happy with
Tadas Maroščikas
Deputy Director of the ERC
tadas.maroscikas@112.lt
/112LT/112LT /BPC112