3. AgendaThree Part Orientation
1)On-line
-Background, continuous reading, reference
2) Face-to-Face Part A ā Monday 8:30-
12:00pm
-Intro to CPED work & culture
3) Face-to-Face Part B ā Wednesday 12:45-
4:00pm
-Getting started at home & finding
support
4. What & Who is CPED?
Jill Perry, Executive Director &
Kristina Hesbol, Membership Committee Chair
What:
ā¢An intellectual journey
ā¢Set of shared
goals/expectations
ā¢Distinguish PhD from EdD
ā¢Strengthen EdD ā
Professional Practice
Doctorate
ā¢Guiding framework
ā¢Honor local context
Who:
Phase Iā 25 US
Phase II ā 56 US
Phase III ā 88
(US, Canada & New
Zealand)
Grassroots effort:
PI ā Faculty member
Graduate Students
Deans/Administrators
5. Ā
"You are creating a model that will become
the model for all doctoral work in education
in the future"
- Lee Shulman, April 2014
7. More stuff can go here.
W o r k in g (
P r in c ip le s(& ( D e sig n (
Co n c e p t s
P h a se &II&P h a se &II&P h a se &I& P h a se &III&
Cr e a 4 n g (R u b r ic s(
f o r (t h e (
A sse ssm e n t (o f (
Ed D (Ca n d id a t e s((
9. FIPSE (2010-2014) - Key Take Aways
21 original CPED institutions, looked at how CPED diffused thru SOEs
10. Growth & Learning
Phase III
ā¢ Build capacity for change within institutions
and across the consortium
ā¢ Continue to develop an organizational
culture and identity
ā¢ Improve the way CPED works & achieves
outcomes
ā¢ Train members in improvement strategies
and provide tools to engage those strategies
ā¢ Collect, analyze, and share data across the
consortium, create a centralized repository
of findings documenting the quality,
efficacy, and efficiency of CPED-influenced
EdD programs
ā¢ Cointinued Grant Seeking
ā¢ Design and develop on-line work
environments, learning experiences at
convenings, and an on-line repository for
our products
11. Vision: transform EdD ļ degree for PK20
practitioners
Mission: improve efficacy & reliability of PPD
Action: on-going & continuous design,
implementation & testing
Recognitio
n Process
12. How do we do this?
CPED Bi-annual Convenings
Signature activity of Carnegie Foundation programs
Central feature=coming together
CPED Convening
Idea Centered Mix of Pedagogies
Multiple Voices
High Expectations
Unstructured
Conversations
Critical Friends
15. Principles & Design Concepts:
Creating an Infrastructure for Change & Improvement
Honorine Nocon, University of Colorado-Denver &
Alan Tinkler, University of Vermont
The Professional doctorate in education:
ā¢Is framed around questions of equity, ethics, and social justice to bring about
solutions to complex problems of practice.
ā¢Prepares leaders who can construct and apply knowledge to make a positive
difference in the lives of individuals, families, organizations, and communities.
ā¢Provides opportunities for candidates to develop and demonstrate collaboration and
communication skills to work with diverse communities and to build partnerships.
ā¢Provides field-based opportunities to analyze problems of practice and use multiple
frames to develop meaningful solutions.
ā¢Is grounded in and develops a professional knowledge base that integrates both
practical and research knowledge, that links theory with systemic and systematic
inquiry.
ā¢Emphasizes the generation, transformation, and use of professional knowledge and
practice.
19. Activity:
Ways to Contribute & Take Back
Sheet
Panel I:
CPED as Professional Development
---
Sharing and learning as a CPED Member
Nancy Shanklin, University of Colorado-Denver,
Bryan Maughan, University of Idaho, &
Rick Sawyer, Washington State University
20. How to be a Change Agent at Home:
Lessons from one Institution on how to change your EdD program
Alisa Belzer, Rutgers University
At least Iām not managing
change in education
21.
22. Panel II:
Strategies for Bringing CPED Home
---
Suggestions for ways to engage your home institution
and its members in CPED ideas and work
Jeff Moniz, University of Hawaii ā Manoa, Ed Bengst, University of
Arkansas & Charlene Trovato, University of Pittsburgh
Activity: Strategies sheetActivity: Strategy
Sheet
28. Overview
ā¢ Mentoring elements and research
ā What is mentoring?
ā What is the content of mentoring?
ā What is the role of the mentor?
ā What is the role of mentee?
ā When is mentoring ineffective?
ā How do you get the most from your mentor?
ā What are CPED mentoring arrangements?
ā¢ Question/Answer; Group Discussion
30. What is mentoring?
ā¢ Formal vs. informal
ā¢ Uni-directional vs. reciprocal
ā¢ Solo mentor vs. constellation of relationships
31. Content of mentoring
Technical: āHow things are doneā
CPED: What are the design elements?
Cultural: āHow things are done around hereā
CPED: How do we get others to buy into CPED design
elements?
37. Ineffective mentoring
ā¢ Mentors with
personal agenda
ā¢ Overly protective
and controlling
ā¢ Restrict problem
solving and decision
making
perspectives
ā¢ Mentors as either
experts or dunces
ā¢ Dependency
relationships
ā¢ Cloning
38. How to get the most out of mentoring
ā¢ Discuss expectations clearly and honestly:
ā What do we need from CPED mentoring?
ā How often do we need to meet/contact each other?
ā What are the best ways to contact you?
ā¢ Intentionally seek advice
ā Do not assume that advice will come without being solicited.
ā¢ Plan ahead for meetings
ā¢ Share concerns, problems, and successes
ā¢ Be active, not passive in the relationship
ā¢ Make only positive or neutral comments about mentor to others
ā¢ If mentoring is not working, change mentors (talk with Jill)