The Indian University Commission was appointed in 1902 by Lord Curzon to investigate and make recommendations about the future of universities in India. The commission recommended establishing new universities and reorganizing existing ones. It suggested reforms to university governance structures, affiliations with colleges, curriculum, examinations, facilities, and scholarships. As a result, the Indian University Act of 1904 was passed, which centralized some university administration but was also criticized for increasing government control over institutions of higher education.
HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx
Indian university commission 1902
1.
2.
3. Indian university commission -1902
• Causes of appointment-
In accordance with his education policy
enunciated at Simla Conference, Lord Curzon
appointed ‘Indian University Commission’ in
1902.
The main cause for the appointment of this
Commission
4. Terms of reference
Indian university commission was to investigate
the following:
1. Future prospects and the conditions of the
university in India established by the British
government.
2. To suggest ways and means for the organization
and working of Indian Universities.
3. To lay down the ways by which the standards of
Higher Education may go up at earliest.
6. The system of senate and
syndicate of universities
should be reorganized that
the senate should have the
members between 50 and
100. The term of a
particular senate should be
5 years while the number
of syndicate members
should be between 9 and
15
2
16. 12
The standard of
the Matric
examination
should be high and
while abolishing
the inter-
examination, the
curriculum of B.A.
should be of 3
years.
17. After Effect of
the
Commission
Report
As
As a result, Lord
Curzon accepted the
recommendations and
a new act called Indian
University act was
passed in 1904,which
is known as Indian
University Act of 1904.
18. Positive Impact Negative
More Centralization
of the power
The strict affiliation
rules made most of
the private agencies
withdraw from the
educational field
Limiting the number
syndicate and
senate members
facilitated more govt.
grip on Universities.
Indian national
leaders condemned
that it was for
destroying the
national movements
for freedom for India.
19. Positive Impact Negative
Strict rules for affiliation
and systematic inspection
helped in the
improvement of quality.
The syndicates were given
statutory status and
teachers provided proper
representation