2. Theory: Social Constructivism
Social constructivism is today seen as the main
theoretical base for information literacy.
Todd (2000) states that new knowledge and
meaningful learning results when a person
consciously and explicitly ties new knowledge to
relevant concepts and propositions already
possessed.
3. Theory: Social Constructivism
Gives learners the opportunity for concrete,
contextually meaningful experience through which
they search for patterns, raise their own questions,
and construct their own models.
To the social constructivist, to learn is to see the
meaning or significance in a social experience or
concept.
4. 3 Information Literacy Models
The three following models of information literacy are
considered prominent ones (Brand-Gruvel, Wopereis &
Walraven, 2009; Wolf, 2003).
A. Kuhlthau´s ISP Model
B. Stripling and Pitts thinking frame model
C. The Big6™ program and learning model
5. A. Kuhlthau´s ISP Model
Kuhlthau developed the following six-stage
model of the information search process (ISP).
She also researched and identified the feelings
students are likely to experience along with
strategies as well as their thoughts and actions
that can lead them through a productive search
6. A. Kuhlthau´s ISP Model
1. Task initiation – uncertainty
2. Topic selection – optimism
3. Pre-focus exploration – confusion/frustration/doubt
4. Focus formation – clarity
5. Information collection – sense of direction/confidence
6. Search closure/presentation – satisfaction or
disappointment
7. B. Stripling and Pitts Thinking Frame
Model
The model designed by Stripling and Pitts (1988) is a
ten steps process. The model can be adapted to any
age level and curricular subject.
8. B. Stripling and Pitts Thinking Frame
Model
1. Choosing a broad topic.
2. Getting an overview.
3. Narrowing down the topic.
4. Developing a thesis or statement of purpose.
5. Formulating questions to guide research.
9. B. Stripling and Pitts Thinking Frame
Model
6. Planning research.
7. Finding – analyzing and evaluating information.
8. Evaluating evidence, taking notes, compile
bibliography.
9. Establishing conclusions.
10. Creating and presenting the final product.
10. C. The Big6 Program and Learning
Model
The Big6 is one of the most widely-known and
widely-used approach to teach information and
technology skills at all school levels (Basli, 2011;
Eisenberg, 2014; Huges, 2003; Murray, 2008).
"www.big6.com" where the users can for example
get various support materials like hand-outs,
presentations, video and guides.
11. C. The Big6 Program and Learning
Model
1. Task definition: Define the problem and identify
information requirements.
2. Information seeking strategies: Determine range of
sources and prioritize them.
3. Location and access: Locate sources then find
information within the sources.
12. C. The Big6 Program and Learning
Model
4. Use of information: Engage and extract relevant
information.
5. Synthesis: Organize information from multiple
sources and present information.
6. Evaluation: Judge the process and judge the
product.
14. REFERENCES
• The Alexandria Proclamation on information literacy and lifelong learning. Beacons of the
information society. (2005, November 9). Retrieved from http://archive.ifla.org/III/wsis/Bea
conInfSoc.html
• Basili, C. (2011). Report on current state and best practices in information literacy. [S.l.]: S.n.]
Retrieved from
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/259334208_Report_on_Current_State_and_Best_Pra
ctices_in_Information_Literacy
• Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I. & Walraven, A. (2009). A descriptive model of information
problem solving while using internet. Computer & Education, 53, 1207-1217.
• Bruce, C. S. (1997). The seven faces of information literacy. Adelaide: Auslib Press.
• Cameron, L. (2004). Assessing information literacy. In I. F. Rockman and Associates (editors),
Integrating information literacy into the higher education curriculum: Practical models for
transformation (pp. 207-236). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. REFERENCES
• Eisenberg, M. (2008). Information literacy: Essential skills for the information age. Journal of
Library & Information Technology, 28, 2: 39-47.
• Huges, S. (2003). The Big6 as a strategy for student research. School libraries in Canada, 22(4),
28-29.
• Kuhlthau, C. C. (1993). A principle of uncertainty for information seeking. Journal of
Documentation, 49(4), 339-355.
• Reynolds, R. (2013). Personal construct theory. In Theory in information behaviour research (pp.
68–82). [S.l.]: Eiconics Limited at Smashwords. Retrieved from https://www.
smashwords.com/books/view/336724
• Todd, R. J. (2000). Theory of information literacy: Information and outward looking.
• In: C. Bruce & P. Candy (editors), Information literacy around the world: Advances in programs
and research (pp. 163-175). Wagga Wagga: Centre for information studies.
16. REFERENCES
• Þórdís T. Þórarinsdóttir & Ágústa Pálsdóttir. (2011). Information Literacy. Learning theories and
assessment. In Ása Guðný Ásgeirsdóttir, Helga Björnsdóttir & Helga Ólafs (editors),
Þjóðarspegillinn. Rannsóknir í félagsvísindum XI. Félags- og mannvísindadeild (pp. 630-639).
Reykjavík: Félagsvísindastofnun Háskóla Íslands Retrieved 12 from
http://skemman.is/en/stream/get/1946/10261/ 25581/3/ Felagsogmannv_deild.pdf