Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
CoI Workshop Madison 2009
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

CoI Workshop Madison 2009


Published on

Slides from the CoI workshop presented at the 25th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Leanring

Slides from the CoI workshop presented at the 25th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Leanring

Published in: Education, Design

  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

No notes for slide
  • Outline of what we will do
  • Individual notes to whole group sharing
  • Individual notes to whole group sharing
  • Individual notes to whole group sharing – I’m thinking that if we are running late we could jettison this activity as we will focus on TP later
  • Cue for group discussion and subsequent sharing
  • Whole group discussion
  • Whole group discussion
  • Transcript

    • 1. COMMUNITY OF INQUIRY FR AMEWORK INFORMING INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN & LEARNING Phil Ice, American Public University System Jennifer Richardson, Purdue University Karen Swan, University of Illinois Springfield
    • 2. • CoI Framework • Social Presence (SP) • Cognitive Presence (CP) • Teaching Presence (TP) • CoI Survey • Development/Validation • Emerging Findings • Practical Applications • Applying CoI to the Design & Teaching of Online & Blended Courses • Design & Organization • Facilitation of Discourse • Direct Instruction • Your Course(s)/Program • CoI Survey as an Evaluation Tool
    • 3. COMMUNITY OF INQUIRY FR AMEWORK (Garrison, Anderson & Archer, 2000) • a process model of learning in online and blended educational environments • grounded in a collaborative constructivist view of higher education • assumes effective online learning requires the development of a community of learners that supports meaningful inquiry and deep learning
    • 4. social presence cognitive presence LEARNING teaching presence COMMUNITY OF INQUIRY FRAMEWORK
    • 5. social presence the ability of participants in a community of inquiry to project themselves socially and emotionally -- as ‘real’ people; the degree to which participants in computer mediated communication feel socially and emotionally connected
    • 6. social presence elements – affective expression, open communication (cohesiveness), group cohesion (interactivity)
    • 7. teacher immediacy LEARNING MODEL COGNITIVE LEARNING Kelley & Gorham, 1988; Gorham, 1988 IMMEDIACY AFFECTIVE LEARNING Plax & Wendt-Wasco, 1985; Richmond, Gorham & McCroskey, 1987; Gorham, 1988 MOTIVATION MODEL COGNITIVE LEARNING STATE IMMEDIACY MOTIVATION AFFECTIVE LEARNING Christophel, 1990; Richmond, 1990; Frymeir, 1994 AFFECTIVE LEARNING MODEL AFFECTIVE COGNITIVE IMMEDIACY LEARNING LEARNING Rodriguez, Plax & Kearney, 1996
    • 8. • social presence theory (Short, Williams & Christie, 1976) – ranking by users (impersonal/personal, unsociable/sociable, insensitive/sensitive, cold/warm) of various media • media richness theory (Rice, 1992) – measures a medium’s capacity for immediate feedback, senses involved, personalization, and language variety
    • 9. research findings  social presence can be (strongly) felt by participants in computer-mediated communication (Walther, 1994; Gunawardena, 1995; Tu & McIsaac, 2002; Richardson & Swan, 2003)  and projected into text-based asynchronous discussion using verbal immediacy indicators alone (Rourke, Anderson, Garrison & Archer, 2001; Swan, 2002; 2003)
    • 10. research findings  perceptions of social presence are linked to student satisfaction in online courses (Gunawardena, Lowe & Anderson,1997; Tu, 2002; Richardson & Swan, 2003)  and to (perceived) learning from them (Walther, 1994; Gunawardena, 1995; Picciano, 2002; Richardson & Swan, 2003)
    • 11. research findings  differences in effects of social presence of instructors & peers (Swan & Shih, 2005)  and interesting differences among student perceptions (Swan & Shih, 2005)  relationship of social presence to course design factors – social context, communication, interactivity (Tu, 2000; Tu & McIssac, 2002)
    • 12. What could you do to help establish social presence in online courses?
    • 13. Social Presence: tips & techniques  Create a “Meet Your Classmates” section of your course where you and students introduce yourselves to one another.  Explicitly introduce students to the unique nature and learning potential of online discussion  Establish rules of Netiquette for your course.  Develop initial course activities to encourage the development of swift trust.  Model & encourage the use of verbal immediacy behaviors in interactions with students.  Encourage students to share experiences & beliefs in online discussion.
    • 14. Social Presence: tips & techniques  Make participation in discussion a significant part of course grades.  Require discussion participants to respond to their classmates postings &/or to respond to all responses to their own postings.  Make students responsible for sustaining discussion threads.  Make students summarize discussion threads.  Require students to incorporate materials from the discussions in their assignments.  Encourage & support vicarious interaction.  Use tracking mechanisms to reward reading as well as responding to messages.  Use short videos of yourself to introduce the course and particular topics.
    • 15. Social Presence: tips & techniques  Journal or otherwise interact with your students on an individual and personal basis.  Use audio to embed feedback on assignments within them.  Design community building activities.  Design collaborative activities – problem solving tasks, projects, small group discussion.  Consider including real time communications using applications such as chat, collaborative whiteboards, interactive video.  Consider incorporating Web 2.0 applications in course activities, especially social software such as blogs, wikis, YouTube, Flickr, MySpace, Second Life, etc.
    • 16. cognitive presence the extent to which learners are able to construct and confirm meaning through sustained reflection and discourse in a critical community of inquiry
    • 17. cognitive presence elements – triggering event, exploration, integration, resolution
    • 18. Private World Deliberation Reflection (Applicability) EXPLORATION INTEGRATION Perception Conception (Awareness) EXPERIENCE (Ideas) TRIGGERING EVENT RESOLUTION Action Shared World (Practice) Discourse practical inquiry model (Garrison, Anderson & Archer, 2000)
    • 19. scaffolding online discussion  concept & process scaffolds (Wong-Busby, 2006)  peer review -- Bloom’s taxonomy (Ertmer, Richardson, Belland, Coulthard, Camin & Mong, 2006)  subject line (Pelz, 2004)  assessment (Swan, Schenker, Arnold & Kuo, 2007)
    • 20. research findings: content  learning concepts vs. learning techniques (Parker & Gemino, 2001; Picciano, 2002)  multiple perspectives (Picciano, 2002)  disciplined inquiry – reflection and interaction (Benbunan-Fich & Hiltz, 1999; Garrison, 2003)
    • 21. research findings  most online discussion never moves beyond the exploration stage (Garrison & Arbaugh, 2007; Kanuka & Anderson, 2000)  online discussion proceeds to integration and resolution when participants are tasked with problem solution & explicit direction & facilitation are provided (Murphy, 2004; Shea & Bidjermo, 2008)
    • 22. What could you do to help establish cognitive presence in online courses?
    • 23. Cognitive Presence: tips & techniques  Identify big ideas you want students to take away from your course and develop major course activities around their assessment.  Identify important knowledge, skills & attitudes students should learn and develop additional course activities around their assessment.  Provide multiple representations of the knowledge you want students to learn and multiple activities for practicing desired skills.
    • 24. Cognitive Presence: tips & techniques  Encourage experimentation, divergent thinking & multiple perspectives in online discussion through provocative, open-ended questions.  Model, support & encourage diverse points of view in online discussion.  Require discussion summaries that identify steps in the knowledge creation process.  Use content & process scaffolds to support discourse behaviors.  Use peer review of discussion postings to shape responses.  Use online discussion & writing activities to support conceptual learning and divergent thinking.
    • 25. Cognitive Presence: tips & techniques  Use self-testing, practice assignments, simulations & other interactive activities to support skill development & convergent thinking.  Develop grading rubrics for discussion & course activities that reward desired cognitive behaviors.  Provide frequent opportunities for testing & feedback.  Automate testing & feedback when possible.  Develop general learning modules with opportunities for active learning, assessment & feedback that can be shared among courses &/or accessed by students for remediation or enrichment.
    • 26. Cognitive Presence: tips & techniques  Present words in spoken form, use words and pictures simultaneously to explain concepts.  Avoid extraneous video & audio, do not add redundant on-screen text.  Begin presentations with descriptions of components & organization.  Allow learners to control the pace of presentations.
    • 27. the design, facilitation and direction of cognitive and social processes for the purpose of realizing personally meaningful and educationally worthwhile learning outcomes teaching presence
    • 28. elements – design and organization, facilitation, direct instruction teaching presence
    • 29. content analysis– “additional comments:” course assignments affect course design instructor instructor instructor /discussion feedback (Swan, Schenker, Lin, Shea & Aviv, 2006) learning
    • 30. changing instructor roles (Coppola, Hiltz & Rotter, 2001)  cognitive, affective, managerial  cognitive role shifts to one of deeper complexity  affective role requires faculty to find new tools to express emotion  managerial role requires greater attention to detail, more structure, additional student monitoring
    • 31. research findings  strong correlations between learner’s perceived & actual interactions w/ instructors and their perceived learning (Swan, Shea, Fredericksen, Pickett, Pelz & Maher, 2000; Jiang & Ting, 2000; Richardson & Swan, 2003)  strong correlations between all three elements of teaching presence and student satisfaction and perceived learning in online courses (Shea, Frederickson, Pickett & Pelz, 2003; Shea, Pickett & Pelz, 2004)
    • 32. teaching presence: instructors SUMMER 2002 SPRING 2003 (n=1140) (n=6088) satisfaction per. learn. satisfaction per. learn. r p r p r p r p design & < < < < organization .64 .01 .59 .01 .64 .01 .60 .01 facilitating < < < < discourse .64 .01 .58 .01 .61 .01 .58 .01 direct < < < < instruction .64 .01 .61 .01 .63 .01 .61 .01 (Shea, et al., 2003, 2004)
    • 33. teaching presence: students SUMMER 2002 SPRING 2003 (n=1140) (n=6088) satisfaction per. learn. satisfaction per. learn. r p r p r p r p (design & organization) facilitating < < < < discourse .36 .01 .37 .01 .41 .01 .43 .01 direct < < < < instruction .39 .01 .39 .01 .40 .01 .43 .01 (Shea, et al., 2003, 2004)
    • 34. research findings  teaching presence linked to development of a sense of community in online courses (Shea, Li, Swan & Pickett, 2005)  critical importance of teaching presence to successful online learning (Garrison & Cleveland- Innes, 2005; Murphy, 2004; Swan & Shih, 2005; Vaughan & Garrison, 2006; Wu & Hiltz, 2004)
    • 35. What could you do to help establish teaching presence in online courses?
    • 36. Teaching Presence: tips & techniques  Provide frequent opportunities for both public and private interactions with students.  Provide students with timely & supportive feedback.  Restrain from being overly “present” in online discussions, rather facilitate student interaction.  Apply collaborative learning principles to support small group discussion and collaborative projects.  Design diverse, graded activities to be completed every week.
    • 37. Teaching Presence: tips & techniques  Design courses for learner choice, flexibility & control.  Design and review courses for clarity & consistency.  Ensure courses are well organized and that the organization is clear to students & easy to navigate.  Clearly state course goals and instructional expectations.  Provide a detailed course schedule including due dates for all assignments.  Provide students with explicit and redundant instructions for all course activities.
    • 38. Teaching Presence: tips & techniques  Provide clear grading guidelines including rubrics for complex assignments.  Review changing faculty roles and reflect on your own cognitive, affective & managerial behaviors.  Develop forums or learning communities for online faculty to share experiences & support one another.
    • 39. COMMUNITY OF INQUIRY SURVEY (Arbaugh, Cleveland-Innes, Diaz, Garrison, Ice, Richardson, Shea & Swan)
    • 40. CoI survey  9 social presence items (3 affective expression, 3 open communication, 3 group cohesion)  12 cognitive presence items (3 triggering, 3 exploration, 3 integration, 3 resolution)  13 teaching presence items (4 design & facilitation, 6 facilitation of discourse, 3 direct instruction)
    • 41. instrument development  work on the development of a unified survey instrument began in December 2006  review of research and commonality of themes  consensus on current items and development on new items – especially cognitive presence
    • 42. research findings  tested in graduate courses at four institutions in the US and Canada  principal component factor analysis  three factor model predicted by CoI framework confirmed (Arbaugh et al, 2008; Swan et al, 2008)
    • 43. research findings  significant relationships between teaching presence and cognitive presence, satisfaction & perceived learning; between cognitive presence and satisfaction & perceived learning; between social presence & satisfaction (Akyol & Garrison, in press)
    • 44. research findings social presence .52 (.52)** .52 (.49)** teaching presence cognitive presence .49(.47)** (Shea & Bidjermo, 2008)
    • 45. research findings  study of effects of embedded audio feedback on student learning found positive increases on 1 social presence, 3 teaching presence, and 2 cognitive presence items (Ice, Curtis, Philips & Wells, 2007)  also being used to study virtual communities of practice (Radcliffe, Strobel, Brophy & Richardson, p.c.) and blended learning (Garrison & Vaughan, 2008; Vaughan & Garrison, 2006)
    • 46. institutional deployment  APUS  end of course survey - comparisons being made by school, program, course and instructor using descriptive statistics and factor patterns  inform the instructional design process – impacts factor pattern in TP (e.g. instructional design influences correlations with ID&O and FD & DI)  assess the efficacy of the integration of new technologies – notable differences across presences with factor cohesion stronger in SP
    • 47. problem area  Literature notes that discussions frequently don’t move beyond the exploration phase  evidence that students may be taking what they learn in discussions and moving to integration and resolution in personal or small group projects
    • 48. How might you make use of the Community of Inquiry Survey?
    • 50. elements – design and organization, facilitation, direct instruction teaching presence
    • 51. design & organization  setting curriculum  designing activities & assessments  establishing parameters  establishing netiquette Go to Handout
    • 52. design & organization  Social Presence principle – establish a climate that will create a CoI and support purposeful collaboration  Cognitive Presence principle – establish opportunities for critical reflection and discourse that will support systematic inquiry
    • 53. facilitation of discourse (and more?)  setting learning climate  prompting reflection & discussion  encouraging, acknowledging, reinforcing student participation  identifying areas of agreement/disagreement  mediating consensus
    • 54. facilitation of discourse (and more?)  Social Presence principle – sustain & build learning community through a shift from purely affective to purposefully cohesive responses  Cognitive Presence principle – encourage & support the progression of inquiry through to resolution
    • 55. direct instruction  present content  ask leading questions / focus discussion  confirm understanding through informal & formal assessment  diagnose & remediate misconceptions  inject knowledge from diverse sources with links for students to pursue
    • 56. direct instruction  Social Presence principle – manage collaborative relationships to support students in assuming increasing responsibility for their own learning  Cognitive Presence principle – promote metacognitive awareness and insure that inquiry progresses through to resolution
    • 57. (How) Can you use the Community of Inquiry framework to the teaching and/or design of your courses or program?
    • 58. (How) Might you make use of the Community of Inquiry Survey as an evaluation and/or assessment tool?
    • 60. Teaching Presence Design & Organization 1. The instructor clearly communicated important course topics. 2. The instructor clearly communicated important course goals. 3. The instructor provided clear instructions on how to participate in course learning activities. 4. The instructor clearly communicated important due dates/time frames for learning activities.
    • 61. Teaching Presence Facilitation 5. The instructor was helpful in identifying areas of agreement and disagreement on course topics that helped me to learn. 6. The instructor was helpful in guiding the class towards understanding course topics in a way that helped me clarify my thinking. 7. The instructor helped to keep course participants engaged and participating in productive dialogue. 8. The instructor helped keep the course participants on task in a way that helped me to learn. 9. The instructor encouraged course participants to explore new concepts in this course. 10. Instructor actions reinforced the development of a sense of community among course participants.
    • 62. Teaching Presence Direct Instruction 11. The instructor helped to focus discussion on relevant issues in a way that helped me to learn. 12. The instructor provided feedback helped me understand my strengths and weaknesses. 13. The instructor provided feedback in a timely fashion.
    • 63. Social Presence Affective Expression 14. Getting to know other course participants gave me a sense of belonging in the course. 15. I was able to form distinct impressions of some course participants. 16. Online or web-based communication is an excellent medium for social interaction. Open Communication 17. I felt comfortable conversing through the online medium. 18. I felt comfortable participating in the course discussions. 19. I felt comfortable interacting with other course participants.
    • 64. Social Presence Group Cohesion 20. I felt comfortable disagreeing with other course participants while still maintaining a sense of trust. 21. I felt that my point of view was acknowledged by other course participants. 22. Online discussions help me to develop a sense of collaboration.
    • 65. Cognitive Presence Triggering Event 23. Problems posed increased my interest in course issues. 24. Course activities piqued my curiosity. 25. I felt motivated to explore content related questions. Exploration 26. I utilized a variety of information sources to explore problems posed in this course. 27. Brainstorming and finding relevant information helped me resolve content related questions. 28. Online discussions were valuable in helping me appreciate different perspectives.
    • 66. Cognitive Presence Integration 29. Combining new information helped me answer questions raised in course activities. 30. Learning activities helped me construct explanations/solutions. 31. Reflection on course content and discussions helped me understand fundamental concepts in this class. Resolution 32. I can describe ways to test and apply the knowledge created in this course. 33. I have developed solutions to course problems that can be applied in practice. 34. I can apply the knowledge created in this course to my work or other non-class related activities.