The document summarizes findings from the JISC Learner Experience Programme (LXP) regarding students' use of technology. The LXP studied students across different disciplines and found extensive use of various tools for tasks like researching, communicating, and completing assignments. Students had personalized approaches and used tools in unintended ways compared to institutional policies. This points to a mismatch between policy directives focused on lifelong learning and the realities of students' technology use in a rapidly changing social and educational context.

1. The student experience How does it align with policy directives? Gráinne Conole [email_address] Eden Conference, Naples 15 th June 2007

2. Mismatch between policy and practice Societal trends, policy, practice Learner voices

3. Culturally rich and complex society with changing norms and values Unpredictable, constantly changing world Giddens Unintended consequences and manufactured risks Becks Virioli Increasing impact of technology Castells Networked society

4. Work Education Technology Globalisation Cultures Economy Values Boundaries Changing society Personalisation Lifelong learning Policy directives Good practice Innovation Initiatives Practice Practice society->policy->impact impact<-policy<-society

5. Context Globalised, networked and information rich environment, changing social norms and values Drivers Widening participation, e-learning, accessibility, democratisation, economic development, lifelong learning Policy Practice UK: Let 1000 flowers bloom Range of funding initiatives, e-Learning strategy China: Government directed, massification Sino-UK programme Education for all Impact Local culture vs. global hegemony, changing roles and structures, new educational and funding models

6. The “net generation” Oblinger, Prensky, Kennedy… Multi-tasking Technology-rich environment Multiple representations Group activities Task orientated Experiential Fast responses Digitally literate Connected Environment Learning approach Process

7. JISC Learner Experience programme Phase one: Review (Sharpe et al) LEX (Creanor et al) LXP (Conole et al) Phase two: Longitudinal study STROLL Six institutional projects Discipline differences, disability, practice-based, transitions between sectors

8. Learner Experiences Project LXP Student experiences Subject discipline differences Uses of technologies Effective e-learning strategies M. de Laat - Exeter, T. Dillon – Bristol, J. Darby – Open University Online survey Audio logs Interviews

9. PB-LXP In-depth study of practice-based students Learning across different boundaries? Strategies used Barriers/enablers, key critical moments Student practice vs. institutional policy Mary Thorpe, Rob Edmunds, Pam Shakespeare, M. de Laat - Exeter Learning design and outcomes √ √ √ Software Reqs for Bus Systems √ √ √ Extending Professional Practice √ √ Applied Social Work Practice √ √ Social Work Practice √ √ Team Engineering √ √ Cisco Networking Wikis & Blogs Conferences E-Portfolios E-assessment Title

10. LXP: Data collection Economics: 2 Languages: 3 Medicine: 5 Computing: 4 Total: 14 Economics: 3 Languages: 47 Medicine: 16 Computing: 19 Total: 85 Economics: 128 Languages: 92 Medicine: 31 Computing: 158 Other: 18 Total: 427 Interviews Audio logs Survey Phase 2 – in-depth case studies Phase 1 – context

11. Learner voices Fabio: an individual learner (Economics) Samir: a social learner Annmarie: an active technology user (Medicine) Gary: learning through practice (Medicine) Jack: social/interactive learner (Computer Science) Finbar: an active blogger (Computer Science) Dzel: aTurkish student (Languages) Peizhi: a Chinese student (Languages)

12. Audio logs Internet sites for meanings and glossary Mobile phone find out about course work MSM chat to send coursework to friends Mobile to text class mates to get exam hints Blogs for personal reflection Internet/search engines to verify concepts Internet to research an essay Google using keywords/phrase Wikipedia and podcasts Voice recorder for collecting interview data USB stick to transfer data between home and uni Dictionary.com to check words Podcasts from English language sites Updating E-Portfolio from the hospital University VLE site to access lectures and check calendar In situ, emotive responses

13. Audio logs Today I used my mobile phone to contact a friend from the same course to ask them where I could get my cover sheet for my essay to hand in today. I had to do this basically because I searched the university web site and I couldn’t find one and I didn’t have one on my computer so I had to ring my friend because I knew he had printed one out for himself earlier in the day… Well basically the mobile phone, … if I didn’t have one I wouldn’t have been able to do this ….I was able to contact XX and ask him where I could find one… I found one on another student’s home page who’d put it up there conveniently so that a lot of people could get it so that was pretty handy and I’ll remember that in the future. Jack: social/interactive learner (Computer Science)

14. Video clips Reflective summaries Encapsulate key findings from Across the studies Highlight range of learners and their appropriation Laura: techno savvy Emma and Jenny: practice application

15. Patterns of use Researching and retrieving information Google, Wikipedia, subject-specific sites Communication Multiple tools, peers/tutors… Assignments Generic tools: Word, Excel, Powerpoint Integrated learning Mixed views on institutional systems, bias towards personalised learning

16. Content Changing nature of content (more available, lower intrinsic value, higher interactivity and standards) Cost and value Materials and information freely available on the Internet Perceived worth of content Presentation Use of multimedia to improve presentation Expectations of good quality content Evaluation New skills for assessing content Skills to ensure work is authentic Communication Different tools for different things Internet to access expert knowledge “ With anyone about anything anytime” Collaboration New forms of collaboration – smart tools and web2.0 Distributed cognition Information Communication Information Communication

17. Technologies for learning Technologies for life Information Communication Passive Interactive Individual Social

18. Implications…. Pervasive and integrated Extensive use of tools for everything Personalised Adapted to personal needs Social Networked peer community Interactive Content not fixed “ Underworld” and mismatch Using tools in unintended ways Policy directives? Lifelong learning, widening participation, digital divide, knowledge economy

19. The macro and micro context How can we maximising the potential of the technologies? Role of policy? Can we let go?? How can we best scaffold this new net generation? How can we exploit the social dimensions: for collaborative design and in how students engage with activities?