3. Where did we start?
Constrained
capital resources
A project process
failure
Member-led
review 20092010
New project
arrangements
introduced
October 2011
5. Where were we?
2011/12
Change
Refinement &
Improvement (2014)
Consolidation &
Compliance (2013)
Implementation
(2011/12)
Time
•
Improved communication about projects, especially problems
•
Corporate overview of all projects within scope
•
Monthly programme reports to Projects Sub-Committee
•
Better consistency in decision-making about projects
•
Greater scrutiny of individual projects is leading to savings
•
Learning lessons from projects and celebrating success
6. Where were we?
2013
Change
Refinement &
Improvement (2014)
Consolidation &
Compliance (2013)
Implementation
(2011/12)
•
Following gateway process and using corporate templates
•
Completing key information on project management system
•
Lessons learnt – systems for institutionalising lessons
•
Gateway 0s – business plans
•
Resource allocation – prioritisation based on categories
•
Staff changes
Time
7. Where are we now?
2014
Change
Refinement &
Improvement (2014)
Consolidation &
Compliance (2013)
Implementation
(2011/12)
•
Improvements to gateway process and corporate templates
•
Review of project management system
•
Changing role of Corporate Programme Office
•
Training and development
Time
8. Lessons
•
Drive from the top is critical
•
Terminology is not important
•
Departmental diversity is ok?
•
Talk to people, particularly the difficult
ones!
•
Articulate clear benefits for all involved
•
Embedding and sustaining involves
different skills to initiating and implementing
Capital projectsReview found:Expertise & good practice in pocketsDecision-making process complicated – mention City’s governanceDelivery fragmented with little interaction & sharing of best practiceNo overview of all projects & a lack of adequate management informationNo systematic learning from projects“Strategic fit” not assessed at corporate level early enough
Faced many challenges:Reluctance to change Lots of change at same timeData qualityFear of corporate interventionResourcesEnsuring elected Members engaged at right time