• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
A Guide to Theories of Change
 

A Guide to Theories of Change

on

  • 1,715 views

A theory of change is a purposeful model of how an initiative—such as a policy, a strategy, a program, or a project—contributes through a chain of early and intermediate outcomes to the intended ...

A theory of change is a purposeful model of how an initiative—such as a policy, a strategy, a program, or a project—contributes through a chain of early and intermediate outcomes to the intended result. Theories of change help navigate the complexity of social change.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,715
Views on SlideShare
1,714
Embed Views
1

Actions

Likes
3
Downloads
0
Comments
0

1 Embed 1

https://my.berkeleycollege.edu 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    A Guide to Theories of Change A Guide to Theories of Change Presentation Transcript

    • The views expressed in this presentation are the views of the author/s and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Asian Development Bank, or its Board of Governors, or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this presentation and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. The countries listed in this presentation do not imply any view on ADB's part as to sovereignty or independent status or necessarily conform to ADB's terminology. A Guide to Theories of Change Olivier Serrat 2013
    • Social Change and its Drivers • Social change is the alteration of mechanisms within the social structure of a society, characterized by changes in cultural symbols, rules of behavior, social organizations, or value systems. • Social change is no simple matter: driven by a composite array of cultural, demographic, economic, environment, political, religious, scientific, and technological forces—singly but more often than not in coevolutionary combination—it almost always eventuates in the face of vested interests that favor the status quo. The difference between what we are doing and what we are capable of doing would solve most of the world's problems. —Mohandas Gandhi
    • Forms of Social Change • Social change takes different forms: – Discursive—a change in the narrative(s) that actors hold about a concern, problem, or issue. – Procedural—a change in the way the processes that manage a concern are carried out. – Content-based—a change in the nature of a concern. – Attitudinal—a change in the way actors think about a concern. – Behavioral—a change in the way actors behave vis-à-vis a concern, in other words, act or interface with others, in consequence of formal and informal changes in discourse, procedure, content, or attitude.
    • Promoting Social Change • Development aid, for one, is ever more sternly asked to demonstrate results, an ancillary of which is to clarify what works or does not work and under what circumstances. • If development aid is about human, social, and economic progress, which of course intuits change, it needs to frame more clearly what concrete outcomes—from dedicated inputs, activities, and outputs—can augment well-being and better the quality of life. • Development aid needs good theories of change that test and validate the assumptions, rationales, means, and ends of all who are involved in processes of development. However, pace the cause-and-effect structure of logic models, current project planning tools do not readily help development aid do so.
    • The Theory of Change Approach • Marrying visioning, planning, and evaluation perspectives, leveraging also concepts of logic models, the Theory of Change approach is an outcomes-based, participatory method that applies critical thinking to the design, implementation, and evaluation of an initiative, e.g., a policy, a strategy, a program, or a project, planned to foster emergent, projectable, or transformative change. A theory of change is a purposeful model of how an initiative—such as a policy, a strategy, a program, or a project—contributes through a chain of early and intermediate outcomes to the intended result. Theories of change help navigate the complexity of social change. First say to yourself what you would be; and then do what you have to do. —Epictetus
    • Explicating Assumptions • A theory of change explores and represents a "so that" chain. It explains how and why a sequence of logically-linked events, aka pathways of change, should lead to an ultimate outcome. It does so by – Articulating assumptions (or worldviews), and the beliefs and hypotheses they rest on, about how short-, medium-, and long-term change happens in a specific external context. – Stipulating how early and intermediate outcomes (preconditions) toward the long-term change will be brought about and documented with indicators that suggest how much of, for whom, and when each outcome is to be realized.
    • Six Overlapping Questions What concern, its underlying causes, and consequences, does one and others wish to ameliorate in the long term (external context? Who does one seek to benefit or influence (beneficiaries)? What benefits does one aim to deliver (results)? When will the benefits be realized (time span)? How will one and others make that happen (interventions)? Why, and based on what evidence, does one believe the theory of change will bear out (assumptions)?
    • Elements in a Pathway of Change Long-Term Outcome and Indicators Intermediate Outcome or Precondition and Indicators Early Outcome or Precondition and Indicators Intervention Intervention Early Outcome or Precondition and Indicators Intervention Intermediate Outcome or Precondition and Indicators Intervention Early Outcome or Precondition and Indicators Intervention
    • Between Intentions and Results • Of course, the advantages of any theory of change are contingent on its being – Meaningful: the magnitude of the long-term outcome being pursued is worth the effort. – Plausible: evidence and commonsense suggest that the interventions, if implemented, will lead to the long-term outcome. – Doable: resources, e.g., financial, human, institutional, knowledge, political, skills, technical, and time, will be available and sufficient to execute the interventions. – Testable: the theory of change is suitably specific and complete for an evaluator to track progress in credible and useful ways.
    • Further Reading • ADB. 2008. Output Accomplishment and the Design and Monitoring Framework. Manila. Available: www.adb.org/publications/output-accomplishment-and- design-and-monitoring-framework • ADB. 2008. Outcome Mapping. Manila. Available: www.adb.org/publications/outcome-mapping • ADB. 2011. Critical Thinking. Manila. Available: www.adb.org/publications/critical-thinking • ADB. 2013. Theories of Change. Manila. Available: www.scribd.com/doc/126540636/theories-of-change
    • Olivier Serrat Principal Knowledge Management Specialist Regional and Sustainable Development Department Asian Development Bank knowledge@adb.org www.adb.org/knowledge-management www.facebook.com/adbknowledgesolutions www.scribd.com/knowledge_solutions www.twitter.com/adbknowledge