Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Accelerated Learning Program
1.
2. CCBC’s Developmental Education Program: Courses A L P The Accelerated Learning Project RDG 051 RDG 052 MATH 081 MATH 082 MATH 083 ENGL 051 ENGL 052 ENG 101 ENG 102
3. results for students who took traditional developmental writing in fall 06 as of June 2010 The Problem ALP Addresses 42%
4.
5. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project semester 1 Traditional ENG 052 ENG 052 ENG 101 semester 2
6. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project ALP ENG 101 semester 1 ENG 052 semester 1
7.
8. students who took ALP from fall 07 to spring 10 as of June 2010 results for students who took traditional developmental writing in fall 06 as of June 2010 S in 052 422 81% U, W, or I in 052 102 19% took 052 2007-09 524
9. students who took traditional developmental writing in fall 06 students who took ALP from fall 07 to spring 10 as of June 2010 S in 052 422 81% U, W, or I in 052 102 19% took 052 2007-09 524 took 101 524 100% took no more writing courses 0 0%
10. results for students who took traditional developmental writing in fall 06 as of June 2010 students who took ALP from fall 07 to spring 10 as of June 2010 S in 052 422 81% U, W, or I in 052 102 19% took 052 2007-09 524 took 101 524 100% took no more writing courses 0 0% A, B, or C in 101 365 70% D, F. I, or W in 101 159 30%
11. results for students who took traditional developmental writing in fall 06 as of June 2010 students who took ALP from fall 07 to spring 10 as of June 2010 19% took 052 fa 06 1023 passed 052 705 69% have not passed 052 318 31% took 101 594 58% took no more writing courses 111 11% passed 101 358 35% did not pass 101 236 23% passed 052 422 81% have not passed 052 102 19% took 052 2007-09 524 took 101 524 100% took no more writing courses 0 0% passed 101 365 70% have not passed 101 159 30% 42%
12. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project ALP Success Rates, 2007-09 traditional 052 fall 06 ALP fall 07 ALP spring 08 ALP fall 08 ALP spring 09 75% 50% 25% ALP fall 09 ALP spring 10 35% pass ENGL 101 69% pass ENGL 101 58% pass ENGL 101 74% pass ENGL 101 70% pass ENGL 101 71% pass ENGL 101 68% pass ENGL 101
13. took ENG 102 154 15% haven’t taken ENG 102 125 12% took 102 187 36% haven’t taken ENG 102 178 34% passed ENG 102 107 10% F, I, or W in ENG102 47 5% passed ENG 102 127 24% have not passed 102 60 11% took 052 fa 06 1023 passed 052 705 69% have not passed 052 318 31% took 101 594 58% took no more writing courses 111 11% passed 101 358 35% did not pass 101 236 23% passed 052 422 81% have not passed 052 102 19% took 052 2007-09 524 took 101 524 100% took no more writing courses 0 0% passed 101 365 70% have not passed 101 159 30%
14. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project Longitudinal Studies: degree completion 15% traditional ENGL 052 fall 06 ALP 2007-8 10% 15% 5% 7%
15.
16.
17. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project 500 students Costs Under Traditional Model
18. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project Costs Under Traditional Model 20 students per section
19. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project 25 sections of Dev Eng X 3 faculty credit hours/section = 75 faculty credit hours Costs for Dev Course Under Traditional Model
20. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project 37% of traditional developmental students take FYC 185 students ÷ 20 students/section = 9.25 sections Costs for ENG 101 Under Traditional Model .37 X 500 = 185 students 9.25 sections X 3 faculty credit hours/section = 27.75 faculty credit hours
21. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project Costs for FYC* Under Traditional Model total for developmental course = total for FYC = 27.5 faculty credit hours 75 faculty credit hours total = 102.5 faculty credit hours
22. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project 500 students Costs Under ALP
23. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project Costs Under ALP 8 students per section
24. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project 62.5 sections of ALP Dev Eng Costs Under ALP Model X 2 faculty credit hours/section = 125 faculty credit hours
25. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project 100% of ALP developmental students take FYC 500 students ÷ 20 students/section = 25 sections Costs for FYC Under ALP Model 1.00 X 500 = 500 students 25 sections X 3 faculty credit hours/section = 75 faculty credit hours
26. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project Comparison of Costs for 500 Students Traditional ALP DEV : 25 sect X 3 cr/sect = 75.00 fch* FYC : 9.25 sect X 3 cr/sect = 27.75 fch TOTAL : 102.75 fch DEV : 62.5 sect X 2 cr/sect = 125 fch FYC : 25 sect X 3 cr/sect = 75 fch TOTAL : 200 fch
27. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project widgets per year cost per widget cost/year to operate $100,000 $200,000 10,000 22,000 $10 $9.09 An Analogy traditional factory ALP factory ALP factory
28. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project 102.75 fch 200 fch 175 (35%) of 500 students pass FYC 350 (70%) of 500 students pass FYC .59 fch per passing student .57 fch per passing student An Analogy traditional factory students per year cost per student cost per year students per year cost per student cost per year ALP factory
29.
30.
31. 2009-10 2007-08 2008-09 2010-11 2011-12 160 students 20 sections 640 students 80 sections 320 students 40 sections 80 students 1280 students 160 sections
32. Dissemination El Paso Community College (Texas) Gateway Community College (Kentucky) Lone Star College Tomball (TX) Patrick Henry Community College (Virginia) Valley Forge Military College (PA) North Central State College (OH) Institutions that are currently offering sections of ALP:
33. Dissemination Institutions that plan to offer some sections of ALP within one year: Blue Ridge Community and Technical College (WV) The Graduate School (DC) Middlesex Community College (MA) Missouri State University-West Plains (MO) Springfield Technical Community College (MA) West Kentucky Community and Technical College (KY) West Virginia Northern Community College (WV)
34. Dissemination Institutions that are planning to offer some sections of ALP in the future: Community College of District of Columbia (DC) Delaware Community and Technical College (DE) Jackson Community College (MI) Kingsborough Community College (CUNY) Scott Community College (IA) Tulsa Community College (OK) Wharton County Junior College (TX) WorWic Community College (MD)
35. thanks for your attention T h e A c c e l e r a t e d L e a r n i n g P r o j e c t Community College Baltimore County A L P
Editor's Notes
After discussing this slide, Peter turns it back to Sarah.