Successfully reported this slideshow.

California Standards Tests

750 views

Published on

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

California Standards Tests

  1. 1. California Standards Tests Preliminary Analysis August 2010
  2. 2. California Standards Tests  Administered annually in grades 2-11  Students receive scale score and performance level on each test  Advanced  Proficient  Basic  Below Basic  Far Below Basic  Results are strongly factored into state and federal accountability systems
  3. 3. English Language Arts 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 09 393.3 386.1 402.4 388.9 375 385.5 380.3 381.9 365.5 365.1 382.4 10 391 385 406.1 385.8 378.4 385.5 387.7 382 362.3 362.2 382.6 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th AVG
  4. 4. ELA: Percent Advanced/Proficient 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 05 67% 67% 73% 69% 65% 67% 65% 72% 55% 54% 06 72% 64% 76% 69% 68% 69% 68% 67% 54% 46% 07 74% 63% 78% 71% 64% 71% 67% 69% 55% 53% 08 70% 68% 77% 73% 68% 72% 69% 70% 62% 54% 09 78% 73% 83% 78% 69% 77% 73% 72% 66% 60% 10 74% 71% 82% 78% 72% 74% 74% 73% 62% 59% 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th
  5. 5. Mathematics 200.0 250.0 300.0 350.0 400.0 450.0 500.0 550.0 600.0 09 430.8 443.6 435.0 422.4 379.6 371.1 413.8 10 429.2 454.3 428.5 422.7 382.1 374.5 415.2 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th AVG
  6. 6. Mathematics: Percent Adv/Proficient 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2nd 76% 84% 82% 84% 88% 82% 3rd 82% 81% 81% 82% 83% 86% 4th 73% 77% 81% 81% 87% 86% 5th 68% 70% 73% 71% 74% 76% 6th 66% 61% 56% 62% 63% 63% 7th 60% 59% 59% 62% 63% 65% 05 06 07 08 09 10
  7. 7. Secondary Math: Percent Adv/Proficient 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Algebra 1 41% 46% 49% 49% 42% 48% Geometry 41% 33% 33% 36% 34% 32% Algebra 2 35% 37% 39% 46% 39% 33% Summative 51% 61% 55% 68% 65% 05 06 07 08 09 10
  8. 8. Academic Performance Index Estimates 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 09 928 876 865 911 841 939 882 970 870 875 854 847 812 10 ESTIMATE 938 854 845 905 850 923 877 971 877 887 839 875 812 AOE BV CHES Hope Jefferson Kelly Magnolia Pac Rim Poinsetti a AOM CHMS Valley CHS
  9. 9. Estimated API Change by School -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Estimated API Change '09 to '10 Change 10 -22 -20 -6 9 -16 -5 1 7 12 -15 28 0 AOE BV CHES Hope Jefferson Kelly Magnolia Pac Rim Poinsetti a AOM CHMS Valley CHS
  10. 10. Comparisons: ELA 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 Carlsbad 391 385 406.1 385.8 378.4 385.5 387.7 382 362.3 362.2 Coronado 394.4 383.2 416.2 387.9 394.1 401.7 396.6 392.3 382.6 379.3 Poway 398.9 383.4 414.4 398.5 392.4 395.6 394.5 389.7 373.9 370.7 San Dieguito 412.3 406.3 398.5 383.7 384.1 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th
  11. 11. Comparisons: Math 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 Carlsbad 429.2 454.3 428.5 422.7 382.1 374.5 Coronado 427.1 448.1 434.1 414.7 384.9 380.3 Poway 431.8 445.3 425.7 439.3 402.1 377.4 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th
  12. 12. Comparison: 8th Grade Algebra 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Carlsbad 88% 58% 51% Coronado 70% 69% 48% Poway 60% 68% 41% San Dieguito 64% 91% 58% % of Enrollment % Adv/Prof Combined
  13. 13. Comparison: 11th Grade Summative Math 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Carlsbad 36% 62% 22% Coronado 37% 75% 28% Poway 41% 70% 29% San Dieguito 60% 60% 36% % of Enrollment % Adv/Prof Combined
  14. 14. ELA by School: Scale Scores
  15. 15. ELA by School: Socio-Economically Disadvantaged Students
  16. 16. ELA by School: Parent Education
  17. 17. ELA by School: English Learners
  18. 18. ELA by School: Special Education
  19. 19. ELA by School: Hispanic Students
  20. 20. Math Scale by School
  21. 21. Math by School: Socio-Economically Disadvantaged
  22. 22. Math Scale by School: Special Education
  23. 23. Preliminary Conclusions  Carlsbad Unified remains a high- performing district  “Pockets of Excellence” exist at different levels  Changes in instructional practice are needed to move to next level of achievement
  24. 24. 2009 Adequate Yearly Progress  Carlsbad Unified, Valley Middle School, and Carlsbad Village Academy are “on watch” for potential Program Improvement Status based on 2010 results.  Official notification to occur at end of August or early September
  25. 25. Year 1 Program Improvement Consequences  District  Notify all parents  Revise district plan  Includes approval from School Board and submission to California Department of Education  Use 10% of Title I funds for staff development  Site  Notify all parents of school  Revise school plan  Use 10% funds for staff development  Provide school choice with paid transportation  District provides technical assistance (TA)
  26. 26. Initiatives for 2010-2011  ARRA  Implementation of Read 180 literacy intervention at all secondary schools  iPod touch computing at Calavera Hills Elementary  Flip Videos for identification of effective instructional strategies  Expansion of Distance Learning options for students  Improve implementation of new math adoptions (K-8)  Revamp Curricular Teams and build on momentum from Summer Institute  Involve students in assessment process  Continue College & Career Readiness Process  Including support systems for AVID, EL, Special Needs
  27. 27. Additional Next Steps  Revise Single Plans for Student Achievement  Districtwide focus on instructional strategies to identify best practices and increase student engagement  Leverage additional time for professional development  Staff Meetings  Semester Break Day  Instruction for English Learners and Mathematics are additional areas of emphasis  Title III Improvement Plan  Partnership with SDCOE Math Experts

×