The Great Homework Debate

The Great Homework Debate
Before we move forward in determining what is effected by way of homework we need to examine
the history that this debate is going through. The great homework debate has gone thru great
changes since its inception. During earlier times children in the lower grades, grades one through
four, received very little if any homework through the year, however the older grades received in
upwards of three hours per night. As years went on we've seen this debate go from a positive factor
for academics to a negative factor. There been many academic and child health organizations that
have led various different movements on this debate. Just since the 1950s we have seen this debate
take on numerous schools of thought from one extreme to the other. Often
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

What Is The Essay 'Arguing On The Internet' By Poza
In the essay "Arguing on the Internet" the author tells of his inexperience in political debate, and
how it shaped his future. (Poza, 2005) His story starts out by telling the readers, about the first time
he posted a comment on the internet about gun control. Poza, was simply sharing his personal
thoughts on the subject and what he got in return was profanity, disgust and the desire to persuade
others by debating effectively. Poza shares some of his thoughts on learning to debate with others.
First, you must know your subject well, take time to study and role play with the debating issue.
Second, sort through your thoughts and pick your strongest points to argue, and throw out any weak
points, they are not worth the debate. Lastly Poza, says "don't ever admit you are wrong". (Poza,
2005) Story telling dates back to the beginning of time, and is an important method that has been
used to share vital information. Stories have been used to pass on tribal information, values, ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Using a humorous opening to a story can put the audience at ease and trust the presenter. (Osburg,
1995) Laughter is a great form of gaining the attention of the audience and allows the speaker to
make a connection. Practicing the storytelling process allows the speaker to make appropriate
changes and helps build confidence in the speech process. An audience will connect better with a
speaker that is confident in the message being presented. (Osburg, 1995) Next, the speaker should
take special care to allow the words to flow steadily. Using words such as "um" "a" and "but" will
make the presenter sound less confident and therefore loose the attention of the audience. (Osburg,
1995) Last, the speaker should prepare according to the audience, take into consideration whether
the audience is young, old, disables, hard of hearing or gender dominate. (Osburg,

Abraham Lincoln And Stephen Douglas: The Great Debates
The debates between Republican, Abraham Lincoln and Democrat, Stephen Douglas, were known
as the Great Debates. There were three important parts that is worthy of taking note about these
debates, these debates include the cause, the content, and the conclusion. First we see the causes of
the debates. Both Lincoln and Douglas were running for a place in the United States Senate in
Chicago, so the debates were held in Chicago. Leading up to the debate both candidates were
rallying supporters and discussing many issues. The most important issue was whether Illinois ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Now, as mentioned before, the topic of debate was slavery, more specifically slavery expansion.
Throughout the debates Douglas tried to get Lincoln to confess that he was an abolitionist, therefore
explaining his opposition to slavery and basically defeating his opponent. But Lincoln claimed that
if slavery expanded, the people are going against the Constitution which states that all men were
created with equal rights no matter the race, intellect, size, moral development, or social standing.
Douglas's opening speech questioned the audience whether they would want an African–American
to have the same rights as a white man, as if it were something that would be terrible. To which
Lincoln responded with the statement that all men were created equally. Douglas and Lincoln also
discussed the Dredd Scott case, Douglas appealed the Dredd Scott decision because it deprived
certain people of rights. Lincoln then challenged that another Dredd Scott case would expand
slavery even to free states. Lincoln said Douglas did not care about whether slavery is voted up or
down and challenged the Freeport Doctrine because it alienated Southerners. This proved to hurt
Douglas because the Southerners would now vote for

The Melting Pot That It Is Made Up Of Many Types Of People...
American being the melting pot that it is, is made up of many different types of people that have
different political priorities. During an election year, these priorities are discussed even more often
and more heatedly. Newscasters light this debate fire daily, as do politicians. Some of these issues
are absolutely essential to the American political life and should be discussed and evaluated in order
to make America great. Even when parties are on opposite sides of an issue, they can agree that
priorities need to be established and evaluated (Gallup, 2016). In evaluating today's society both
economic and social issues top the list of priorities. Economic issues top the list of priorities for
most American. Unemployment is a word that Americans hear on a daily basis. Currently the 62.7%
of adults who are able to work are currently working and three major factors are driving the
decrease in workers. Due to the large number of "baby boomers" who are retiring, which is healthy
and understandable, we have a decline in the number of adults who work. Another positive reason is
due to a larger number of college students and graduate students. The cause that is worrisome is the
people who have "given up" on finding work. The Wall Street Journal estimates that about 2.6
million of the roughly 92 million American adults who don 't work want a job but aren 't looking for
one (CNN, 2016). Politicians and citizens alike recognize this as a political concern. Foreign trade is

Speech : Speech And Debilitate
Speech and debilitate I am afraid of many things; I fear heights, large crowds, death even fucking
moths, all of which I have justifiable reasons for but my biggest fear the fear of public speaking is
nonsensical. I know it is a ridiculous fear there is no inherent danger involved in speaking publicly
it's no different from a personal conversation just louder but for some reason I can't get over it and
trust me I've tried. In my senior year of high school, I was given a throw away assignment
something the teachers used to fill the time. My English teacher Mrs.Woods had every student pick
one song and describe examples of rhyme, simile and metaphor used. It was a simple assignment
something a fifth grader could do with ease. The only problem for me was that we had to do it in
front of the entire class. At the time I was by no means shy, I considered myself a master of small
talk (whop dee doo), easily able to strike up conversation with any of my peers. So you would think
that public speaking would come just as naturally. I thought so, I really hadn't experience the fear
beforehand. So when it was my turn to present my ingenious findings on the use of figurative
language use in Elton Johns "Candle in the wind" I was confident. I stood up from my seat smiling,
walked up to the chalk board in my blue baggy jeans and XL t–shirt and opened my mouth only to
find the sound of silence. What just happened? My throat tensed up, my mouth was suddenly dry
and my body was unstable. I

The Great Debate Research Paper
Karan Makhija
N01112988
Professor: Arun Dhanota
Course: CJS 101–OLA
Submission date: 02/11/2015
Assignment: The Great Debate
Citizens of Canada are protected by the laws established within the past five decades including; The
Code of Conduct, The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom and the Youth Criminal Justice Act
with many more followed. In Winnipeg, Manitoba a teen at the age of 16 had murdered 20 year old
David Michael in his head on September 25, 2011. (Turner, James, 2013, n.d) After trial the boy's
name was revealed to the public after Brenda Keyser, the Court of Queen's Bench justice had
decided that he was a "high risk to reoffend". (Turner, James, 2013, n.d) This was not the convicts
first offence, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The method of using factual guilt would allow more convicts to be sentenced with innocent citizens
also being punished as where the current method of legal guilt will protect innocent people from
being sentenced but allowing more suspects getting away with the law. With Sinclair's case, the due
process of legal guilt protects one's right till proven guilty was applied and executed as intended
without having conflicts with the law, evidence was provided and a violation in the law was found
thus confirming his sentence. The methodology has proven to work in this case and in several other
cases as well. If factual guilt was used, the chances of Sinclair getting the same sentence would be
considerably high. The reason why legal guilt would be better is to prevent people from being
punished unnessarily. Also the Code mentions how one's rights should not be abandoned under any
circumstances and is innocent till proven guilty. Arguments can be made that factual guilt can be
more beneficial, preventing murders like O.J. Simpson escaping from the law, making communities
more safe. The drawback of this is the violation of section 11 in the Charter of rights and freedom
preventing people feeling confident in their law enforcement and increasing their chances of being
falsely

The Great Debaters: The Wiley College Debate Team Essay
Introduction Conflict is inevitable in any personal relationship or among members of any group.
While we encounter many types of conflict in our lifetime, we often look for ways to avoid conflict.
So, why do we run away from dealing with our conflict? It is often because many of us fear the
conflict will escalate into a situation we will not be able to sustain. "As conflicts escalate, they go
through certain incremental transformations. Although these transformations occur separately on
each side, they affect the conflict as a whole because they are usually mirrored by the other side. As
a result of these transformations, the conflict is intensified in ways that are sometimes exceedingly
difficult to undo" (Pruitt, and Kim 89). We ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
has not yet learned how to truly harness the power of knowledge through action and assertion.
James Jr. has seen the raving effects of racism all around him, and longs to live in a future where no
one must be in fear simply because of the color of their skin. Other talented debaters on Tolson's
team include fiercely independent student Henry Lowe, and Samantha Brooke –– the first ever
female ever to join the Wiley College debate team. While most educators may not have recognized
the remarkable potential of assembling such a disparate team, Tolson's unique vision truly set him
apart from the pack as the team begins to experience a series of consecutive victories on their road
to challenging Harvard at the National Championships" (Buchanan). Event One of the challenges
the Wiley College debate team was faced with in the film was during a debate against Oklahoma
City University. The topic selected for argument was whether Negroes should be admitted into the
same colleges as Whites. This particular subject is one the students at Wiley College were all too
familiar with. The setting of the debate would begin the escalation of the conflict between the two
schools. The intensity of the conflict began when Oklahoma City University refused to hold the
debate on campus and would only accept the challenge to go up against Wiley College if the
competition was held at another location. In a clip provided by YouTube the arguments begin with
Samantha

Great Afterlife Debate
In the "Great Afterlife debate," Michael Shermer and Deepak Chopra embody two different opinions
concerning the existence of afterlife. Shermer points out that the concepts of afterlife and near–death
experiences are illusion of the brain. Chopra disproves that afterlife is a concept from the scientific
perspective in the course of refuting the arguments of Shermer. In what follows, this essay is an
agnostic point of view for support neither of the arguers.... (THESIS......)
There are two separate parts of the debate in respect of the issue of afterlife. In the first place,
Michael Shermer argues that afterlife is not real on the basis of six main evidences from Deepak
Chopra's book, Life After Death: Burden of Proof. He considers that the belief of Chopra "is almost
entirely based on faith, the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Shermer claims that the idea of afterlife or paradise are shaped and reshaped by the human mind to
refute the arguments forwarded by Chopra. By using the report about out–of–body experiences,
Shermer points out that it is impossible to have a world after death or any out–of–the–body paradise.
To strengthen his argument, Shermer restates the argument that there is no afterlife since "[paradise]
is in our thoughts and in our actions. It is in our lives and in our loves. It is in our families and in our
friends. It is in our communities and in our world. It is in the courage of our convictions and in the
character of our souls" (The Great Afterlife, p15). On the other hand, Deepak Chopra refutes the
arguments made by Shermer and afterlife is about consciousness in the second place. He argues that
afterlife is not from imaginations and it is a state of awareness by citing the modern near–death
experiences are of concrete nature. From the scientific and metaphysical perspectives, Chopra
claims that "Hamlet was right to call death an undiscovered country, not because the living cannot
reach it but because heaven's geography keeps shifting" (The

Essay on The Great Debate on Global Warming
The cause of global warming has been a debate between scientists and experts for numerous years.
In fact, Svante August Arrhenius, a Swedish chemist, first predicted global warming would occur in
1896 (Harris 16). Researchers who agree it is naturally caused insist the greenhouse effect has many
natural causes. Others agree that the cause of the Earth's increase in temperature is just part of a
continuous cycle. These researchers argue that solar activity plays a huge role in the issue of global
warming. Therefore, based upon the myth of the greenhouse effect, cyclical patterns, and research
on solar activity, global warming is not a man–made dilemma. When greenhouse gases trap heat in
the atmosphere, similar to the way greenhouse panes ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The greenhouse effect will continue naturally. Methane makes up thirteen percent of greenhouse
gases (Hopwood & Cohen 2). Wetlands are accountable for most of the natural methane
concentrations polluted into the air because they contain bacteria that produce this gas during
decomposition (Sources and Emissions 5). For this reason methane is often called swamp gas
(Hopwood & Cohen 6). As part of their digestive process, termites release methane. Also, Oceans,
rivers, and estuaries are populated with marine plankton and fish that create methane when they
digest too(Sources and Emissions 5). Cows breathe out methane when they burp (Harris 10). Natural
hydrates, mud volcanoes, gryphons, steam vents, wildfires, wild animals and bubbling hot springs
expel methane in nature(Sources and Emissions 6). The causes of methane emissions are limitless,
but it is evident that it is not a manageable greenhouse gas. The final greenhouse gas, nitrous oxide,
is "laughing gas." It is colorless, has a sweet sent, and makes up six percent of the total greenhouse
gases. Naturally, it is discharged from oceans and bacteria that populate in soils. It can also be found
in human and animal waste. Since 1750, nitrous oxide levels have been on the rise. Although nitrous
oxide does not contribute to the greenhouse gases as much as carbon dioxide and methane do, it is
important to suppress this gas because it remains in the atmosphere for a very long time (Hopwood
& Cohen 7).

How Did The Great Debate Pros And Cons
The Great Debates The political debates amongst Nixon and Kennedy assume a gigantic part in TV
history, and the historical backdrop of America. It formed the way that we run our political races
today. The politics debate being aired on television enabled individuals to see the character and
activities of both candidates. During these televised debates, various viewers saw Kennedy's self
assurance and how well put together he was. But then on the other hand, Nixon had a harder time
and gave off a frightful vibe to the viewers who were watching the debated. Individuals who
watched it on TV felt Kennedy won the debate, while the individuals who tuned in to the radio felt
Nixon won. This point is important, essential, and identified with television

What Is The Great Debate 2016
Running head: The Great Debate 2016: Marijuana Legalization 1 THE GREAT DEBATE 2016:
MARIJUANA LEGALIZATION 9 The Great Debate 2016: Marijuana Legalization Francie
DeSalvio Middlesex Community College Introduction On November 8th 2016 this country will
elect its 45th President. There will also be a record number of marijuana initiatives on November
ballots across the country. Medical Marijuana questions will be offered to voters in four states;
Arkansas, Florida, Montana and North Dakota. Five States will be voting on whether or not to allow
legal recreational marijuana laws. Arizona, California, Maine, Massachusetts and Nevada. Twenty–
four states currently have medical marijuana laws. This current list dates back to 1996, with the first
state being California. Four states have passed recreational marijuana laws. Washington and
Colorado in 2012, followed by Alaska and Oregon in 2015. Only nine states throughout the United
States have prohibited use of any kind, recreational or medical. Looking at these numbers, one
would assume that the trend to passage is on the positive. If this is true, why the deep divide in poll
numbers in regard to this question? Following the state wide passage of recreational use in Colorado
in 2012, one county in Colorado, Pueblo county has now gathered enough signatures to allow the
following question: whether to terminate recreational marijuana sales and operations. Could this be
a trend to watch in the future, reversal

The Great Trophy Debate
For many kids around the world, childhood sports are a cherished and blossom lasting friendships.
Some kids choose to participate and others just sign their children up. Recently, "The Great Trophy
Debate" has sparked a question of whether or not all participants should receive trophies or not.
Currently, many sport organizations have taken about traditional trophies and substituted
participation trophies for all. O'Sullivan argues that participation trophies are not really trophies
because the more trophies given out, the less worth each will have. O'Sullivan argues, "Supporters
of such trophies state that trophies motivate kids to play, yet research shows that extrinsic
motivation on its own can be harmful, not helpful." ("The Great Trophy Debate.") O'Sullivan means
that traditional trophies inspire young athletes to compete with excellence. A trophy signifies an
accomplishment. Yes, it is wrong and harmful for an athlete to be solely motivated by winning a
trophy. O'Sullivan argues, that is equally as harmful to remove this reward and act like a losing team
is just as good as a winning team. Without competition, what are sports?
Trophies are expensive. Fees for organized youth sports are through the roof. ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Participation trophies are wrong because they diminish the value of trophies and wreck the
competitive spirit of youth sports. Yes, some parents and kids take youth sports too seriously.
Participation trophies are not the answer to solving this issue. Participations trophies are unjust
because they do not reward those who deserve it and do reward those who do not deserve it. A
utilitarian would also see these trophies as an awful use of resources. Wouldn't the result be the same
if youths were all given participation trophies or they all were not given anything? The minimum
number of trophies optimizes the effect it has on the athletes. This is the best use of resources and
truly embodies what a trophy

Great College Debate Essay
Great College Debate Many people will tell you that you college is the most important thing you
could do after high school. However, there is no right or wrong answer. Different people are made to
do different things. "What alternatives are there?" you might be wondering. There are many things
to do once you graduate from high school. All people have certain skill sets that they can use after
high school. Not all high school graduates are able to be successful in college. By the same token,
there are plenty of students who would succeed with college. The alternatives, most modern parents
have trouble acknowledging them. Some people are best suited for the military, some suited for
college, and some are suited to go straight into the job force doing jobs such as welding and
construction.
The military is becoming an increasingly common job to go into after high school. What most
people like about it is that you don't need to be intelligent, nor do you need to have any life skills.
The military will take you from being a soft putty into a rock solid sculpture. They stress discipline
as well as teach you the skills you need to go into the workforce if you only plan on staying for 4
years. "Depending on the duration of your service and what school you choose to attend, you ...
Most middle aged people of today will tell you that there's almost nothing in life that you can do
without a good college degree. Going to college out of high school is very expensive. Many will
agree that if you can afford to go without putting your family into some sort of financial jeopardy,
do it. Many people also try to go to the military after college because you will be placed into a job
that greatly lowers your risk of ever finding yourself in any combat situation. College is also a very
fun social experience when you are younger as opposed to when you decide to get out of the
military and find yourself quite a bit

The Great Stem Cell Debate
What's All the Fuss?
Laura Alfonso
University of Phoenix/Axia College
Insert a page break to start a new, separate page from your entire text. Don't just use the return
button to get you to a new page. If you make corrections, it changes the formatting of the pages.
What's all the Fuss?
TAB "Every twelve minutes another name is added to the national organ transplant waiting list"
(Donate life America, 2009) (para. 1&2). The National Center for Health Statistics (2008) website
states "652,051 people die every year of heart disease, 75,119 die of diabetes, 43,901 die of
nephritis, nephritic syndrome, and nephrosis [kidney disease]." According to Donate life America ...
Pro–lifers do not seem to have a problem with this. Their problem only seems to be with using the
stem cells from these embryos for life saving research. Does not the need of the many, outweigh the
need of the few? (Star Trek, The Wrath of Khan, 1982) This researcher believes that it does.
According to The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS, 2009) "After
researchers isolate stem cells from a human embryo, the cells often replicate indefinitely, creating a
'cell line'" (para. 16). Furthermore, The AAAS (2009) states, "Scientists raised concerns about these
cells centering on five questions: whether the cell lines were indeed robust stem cell colonies;
whether the procedures used to create the cells were consistent with high ethical standards; whether
the different cell lines had sufficient genetic diversity; whether cells produced from the cell lines
would be safe for implantation in humans; and whether the owners of the cell lines would make
them available to researchers in a timely fashion and at a reasonable cost period" (para. 20). New
paragraph? The box below contains information on the number of cell lines in existence and at the
names of the laboratories where they are located as of August 9, 2001, according to a statement put
out by the NIH. (American Association for the Advancement of Science 2009)

The Great Debates
The Great Debaters is a 2007 American biographical drama film directed by and starring Denzel
Washington. Written by Robert Eisele, based on a story by Mr. Eisele and Jeffrey Porro. The story is
spin around the efforts of the debate coach Melvin B Tolson at wiley college who coached the
college debate team. The team was including merely of African–American students at a time when
racismand Jim Crow laws were still facts of life in the South. "The Great Debaters" is about a longs
hot debate team that wins a national championship. The film is the journey of the coach
MelvinTolson. He is brilliant teacher..He's organizing both poor whites and blacks, whose serfdom
is equal. He conducts auditions and selects four members and he coach them and leads

Obamacare : The Great Debate
Obamacare: The Great Debate The Obama Presidency is known for many things: two wars,
economy crashes, government shutdowns and, yes, the infamous Obamacare. Throughout the last
six years, President Obama's agenda was set towards passing a major healthcare reform bill: The
Patient Protection and Affordable Healthcare Act (ACA), more commonly known as Obamacare.
Passed on March 23, 2010 under considerable opposition, ACA is widely considered to be the
landmark achievement of Obama's presidency, and his hopeful legacy for historians long afterward.
The law has since survived multiple challenges regarding its legality, but its impact on the intended
(original) goal of reducing medical costs is still unclear. Affordable healthcare for all ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Its size and complexity makes it is very difficult to implement and even more difficult to understand.
Even Nancy Pelosi (D–CA), Speaker of the House, echoed this air of uncertainty while advocating
for passage of the bill in 2010 when stating "But we have to pass the bill to learn what is in it." Once
the bill became law, arguments arose when discussion began on the specific details, regulations, and
strategy for implementation. There are endless angles to approach this law, each with a mix of fact,
bias, and prediction. Most viewpoints agree with the primary goal of Obamacare, to make healthcare
affordable for everyone, but differ on the balance between the roles that government and private
insurance companies should play in the solution. All the ifs, ands, or buts can cause chaos, as
nothing of this size has ever been passed before. No matter the opinion or bias, it all comes down to
the age–old battle over power and money. SUBSIDIES Obamacare, in its original form, was
intended to function primarily at a state level. The deal was that each state would set up an online
exchange where US citizens could log in to their state's "exchange" to select a government–
sanctioned healthcare insurance plan that was right as well as affordable. The Federal government
raised taxes and worked Obamacare into its budget, figuring to disperse money to the states for
funding of the program; this money is called a subsidy. The subsidies would be sent to the

Persuasive Essay: The Great GMO Debate
The Great GMO Debate
We believe that GMOs can help us benefit economically, and socially in many ways. They can help
resolve world hunger or help create healthier crops with more nutrients. Many argue that they are
harmful to the environment but they are not, research shows that GM foods are perfectly safe, can
result in using less chemicals and help the world. Genetically modified foods are perfectly safe to
eat. The National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine have conducted lots of
experiments testing if these foods are safe and healthy to eat. They have found that GM foods are
not any less safe than foods that are not genetically modified.The scientists wrote that they, "'found
no substantiated evidence that foods from GE ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Fewer chemicals are used because the plants are altered to be resistant to the harsh conditions that
pesticides protect them from. The use of fossil fuels has decreased because less insecticides and
herbicides are used on the GM plants, "In Bangladesh conventional farmers sometimes have to
spray their brinjal (eggplant) crops twice a week to protect them from the highly damaging fruit and
shoot borer–that's over 180 times a season. IR brinjal may need as little as one application during a
season." Planting GMOs can infect the land of other farmers and as an effect of this, the neighboring
farm will gain the benefits that come with the GE plants. The other plants may be resistant to the
harsh environments surrounding them. Some people may say that GM foods that are given to 3rd
world countries are bad and unhelpful. Some african farmers have actually asked for them to be
banned. They say that we should, '"recognise that farmers in Africa already have effective
approaches to seed and agriculture, which are far more environmentally and farmer–friendly than
GM.'" But their crops don't have special nutrients in them that they need to survive like GM foods
do. In GM foods they insert genes like beta carotene from other organisms to make them

The Policy Of The Federal Government Should Enact Based On...
Weimin Deng (Tuesday Section)
Debate as a Life
Background History of Debate In my sophomore year of highschool, I joined the policy debate club.
Policy debate was an intensive academic activity where teams of two would engage in discussions
on the best government 's policy to enact. There would be two teams in each debate round:
affirmative or negative. The affirmative would have to propose a policy that the U.S federal
government should enact based on their constructed advantages for implementation. After that
speech, the negative team would have to make arguments, for examples, kritiks, disadvantages, and
counterplans, to refute the implementation of the plan. Throughout an almost two hour debate round,
both teams will try to speak almost 500 words per minute in order to respond to arguments. As one
can imagine, debate is fast paced activity that boils down to which team can best defend their
arguments. Within in this debate round, there would be a judge to decide the winner. Flow:
Difference between Exotelic and Autotelic
The concept of flow in occupational science is described as an autotelic experience where an
individual is fully engaged under a high challenge activity. Often times, one may lose sense of time
due to high level of concentration. My engagement with debate did not begin with an autotelic
experience, but I was introduced by my friends to a debate camp that paid students $400 dollars
each to learn the structure of policy debate. This

Body Cameras Argument Analysis
We live in a world where we communicate with many individuals in different ways. A debate is a
structured argument, in which it conducts two sides of an argument where individuals are either
affirmative and negative side. The first affirmative speaker begins the argument and is then followed
by the first negative speaker. When given the debate topic, my group and I were told that we will be
debating the issue on body cameras, in which we resolve that the body camera should or should not
be implemented by police officers across the U.S.
It is important to understand what makes a great debate topic in order to win the argument. When
looking for any information about a case I tend to ask myself question like 'how current is the
information that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Dan Rothwell, Rothwell mentioned an important fact, which should be done by anyone who does
any sort of speech, he had stated that "oral style works most effectively when language is clear and
understandable" (Rothwell,2014). I agree with this statement because I allow my nervousness to
take over, in which it causes me to stutter on my words, pause for a few seconds and sometimes
even wanting to give up because of the embarrassment. It is important for your style of language to
be understood and clear no matter the way you do. Of course, you cannot do a speech in which you
use word slang, which is something else that Rothwell touched upon in the reading. Moreover, a
debate becomes more effective by the way you connect with your audience, for example like pathos,
ethos and logos. However, when during my debate, I believe my team and I brought the emotions of
pathos. In which Rothwell define pathos as "Although logic and evidence can be very persuasive,
especially for highly involved listeners, emotional appeals" (Rothwell,2014). We provide our
audience with real evidence, when we contact the police department, which caught the audience
attention and wanting to keep listening. As well as for logos, which is defined as "building argument
based on logic and evidence" (Rothwell, 2014), I believe my teammates and I provide great
evidence and information to back up the debate on body cameras not being implemented by police

The Great Debate About College Roommates
The Great Debate about College Roommates In most cases, for people who once attended college
they either consider it the best years of their life or a horror show. They may feel this way because of
the experiences they had, classes they took, or the people they met, like perhaps their roommate. In
the New York Times article, "A College Education Should Include Rooming with a Stranger", Anna
Altman explains the effects of having a roommate in college. Anna Altman claims college freshman
already have a lot to adjust to in their first weeks, including the new living arrangements in the life
of the dorms and meeting a new person that now shares the same home as them. With the help of
preference options when applying for dormitory housing, the simple aspects of assigning two
college attendees to one room has improved over ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, Altman adds that even though colleges try their best to make the match between
roommates as smooth as possible, it does not always work out that way for everyone during their
first year away from home. Altman suggests, "...that approach is no longer sufficient". She quotes
Natasha Singer, also a reporter for the New York Times, saying "...the problem of getting stuck with
an incompatible freshman–year roommate can be expensive for the college. Moving students around
within dorms can be a headache, but there's even more at stake: the risk that students will be so
unhappy that they might transfer out of the college before sophomore year." The issues Altman
presents through Natasha Singer's words for unhappy roommates in college are both direct and
indirect. Some of the horror stories told by alumni are about the struggle they went through to find
the right roommate after many failed attempts of changing dorms and testing uncharted waters with
a new peer. Some of these unfortunate people consider the struggles too great and quit college all
together. In turn, colleges lose tuition money

The Great Debate John O'sullivan Analysis
What do you think life would be like if everyone got a trophy for just going to school or work? That
would be crazy! That is not how life works, so why should kids get a participation trophy for just
showing up.That is a waste of an organization's scarce funds. Also, the more trophies given out the
less each one means. Youth athletes should be allowed to fail. On the other hand, some people
believe it is worth a few bucks to give a kid a smile. Participation trophies are unessential for
rewarding youth athletes in sports. The more participation trophies given out the less each one
means. In section two of "The Great Debate: Do We Need Participation Trophies" by John
O'Sullivan states nothing makes the trophy special if everyone gets one. The trophy is special if
when no–one else gets one except you. When trophies like hardest worker and MVP motivate youth
athletes to work hard because they want one of those trophies. That is what keeps youth athletes
trying their hardest and giving their best. Trophies are not what matters, it is the hard work you put
in that matters. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In section 3 of "The Great Trophy Debate: Do we Need Participation awards" by John O'Sullivan
states that organizations spend thousands of dollars on participation trophies. Instead or paying for
the participation trophies, the money could go to supplies such as: balls, jerseys, and fields or courts.
The money could also be used to put coaches through trainings to become better coaches. Therefore,
participation trophies are a waste of money which can be used for better

Melvin B. Tolson's The Great Debates
The Great Debates is a drama that was released in the year 2007, it is based on a real life story of an
African American man named, Melvin B. Tolson. Academy Award winning actor Denzel
Washington plays Melvin B. Tolson in the movie. Melvin B. Tolson was a professor at Wiley
College Texas. In the year 1935, Mr. Melvin B. Tolson, motivates the students to join their school's
first debate team. The team made it all the way up to compete with Harvard in the national
championship, furthermore, Harvard was known as the best. The debate team was a team of four
students, three boys and one girl. However, in this true life movie actor Denzel Washington engaged
in numerous good communication ethics in more than one scene (Washington, Black, Forte, Roth, ...
He continued to tell them that his father was one of the meanest and the most restless slave in that
time. He sternly told them that his father was strip of his clothes with each leg tied to two horse
facing opposite direction. His father was then set on fire, while each horse was whipped, causing
him to ripped apart. Basically he was telling them the slave masters take their minds but kept their
bodies. Therefore, they should keep their minds, especially being young and on the debate team
(Washington, Black, Forte, Roth, Winfrey, Eisele & Porro, 2008). Denzel Washington was graphic
and serious while he was telling the students about his father. However, I believe he had thought
them a good lesson in the dialogue. I believe the moral of the dialogue is to keep your mind
regardless of what may happened in your life. Because if someone control your mind they basically
control your life, for example, the slaves. Nevertheless, Denzel Washington used intercultural
communication ethics which I think was good.
However, in another scene, Denzel Washington employs Public discourse ethics. Public discourse
ethics protects and promotes a place of conversation for diversity of ideas and persons (Arnett, Fritz,
Janie & Bell, 2008). Moreover, Denzel Washington was in a secret and private barn with
approximately fifty five other men, they were African Americans, Hispanics as well as Caucasian.
They seem to be discussing issues that they were facing with the farm bosses, therefore they were
trying to get organized and have a plan so to make things right for them (Washington, Black, Forte,
Roth, Winfrey, Eisele & Porro,

Argumentative Essay: The Great Debate
The Great Debate is about the weather or not to keep The Constitution. Which the Anti–Federalists
didn't want around anymore. But The Federalists had believed that somebody had to have some type
of power to keep all states in control at once. But it had to be ratified by at least 9/13 states to
become a legal. But each side had their own opinions on how the states should be handled.
The Federalists had Supported The Constitution, but didn't think it required a Bill Of Rights. They
Thought it would be better to start from scratch with the Articles Of Confederation. Wanted to limit
the Government with 3 branches of government (Legislative, Judicial, Executive). A stronger central
government for unity and strength is needed for the nation. Therefore

Canad The Great Canadian Flag Debate
The Sixties was and still is a decade of great significance for the northern country of Canada, it is
due to the fact that the decade brought intense changes to Canada through historical occurrences that
the decade was and still is a significant decade for Canada. The historical occurrences that happened
in the Sixties in Canada that were the most significant to Canada in terms of bringing changes to
Canada were the occurrences known as the Great Canadian Flag Debate, the Quiet Revolution and
the occurrence known as Trudeaumania; these important occurrences are still significant to Canada
as they continue to bring change to Canada through the things in which they caused. The changes
brought on by the historical occurrences stated, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This unique era transformed and continues to transform Canada through occurrences such as the
Great Canadian Flag Debate, the Quiet Revolution and through the occurrence known as
Trudeaumania. No other decade has transformed Canada quite like the Sixties, it is due this that the
Sixties is the most significant decade in Canada's vast history in terms of transforming or changing
the country.
The historical occurrence known as the Great Canadian Flag Debate brought major changes to
Canada. Prior to Canada adopting its current sovereign state flag, a number of big events
encouraged Canadians to think about what it meant to be a Canadian, Canadians began to question
their flag, they wondered if their flag truly represented what it meant to be a Canadian, many people
wanted a new flag of Canada as they felt that their flag did not truly represent what it meant to be a
Canadian. In the year 1958, an extensive poll was taken in Canada, it related to the attitudes that
adult Canadians had towards the flag of their country; of those who expressed opinions, over 80%
wanted a sovereign state flag entirely different from that of any other country, and 60% wanted a
sovereign state flag that would showcase their beloved maple leaf. Some people liked this idea of
adopting a new sovereign state flag as they wanted their flag to be uniquely Canadian, however
some people did not like the idea as they were content with the flag that they had,

Federalism: Two Sides To The Great Debate
Federalism is a type of government that divides the power with the central government, states and
local governments. A federal government is different than a confederation in the way that the states
and local government have more power than the main government. There are also different kinds of
federalism such as; dual and cooperative federalism. In dual federalism, they believe that states and
other local government should have as equal power as the central government. In cooperative
government, they believe that states and other local government should have an equal power as the
central government. One historical example of a debate on federalism was the Great Debate. There
were two sides to the Great Debate, the anti–federalists and the federalists. The Federalists wanted
to ratify the Constitution however, the Anti–Federalists did not. The Federalists felt that this wasn't
necessary, because they believed that the Constitution limited the government not the people.
The role of Congress in a federal ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Full faith and credit addresses the fact that states within the United States have to respect public
acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state. An example of this would–be driver's
license. For instance, if a driver has a driver's license in the state of California but they travel to
Maryland, then Maryland has to honor their driver's license through the full faith and credit clause.
Another example of this would–be marriage laws, if a person is married in one state then it will be
valid in any state in the United States because of the full faith and credit clause. The due process
clause in the fourteenth amendment relates to federalism because the amendment grants citizenship
to anyone who was born or naturalized in the United States no state can make a law that may harm a
citizen's privilege in the United

The Great Debate
The Great Debate: Science vs Religion
The relationship between religion and science has been a subject to numerous debates, earning its
place in multiple forums and dominating the news. Disputes arise because science and religion are
two very different disciplines. For instance, science is ultimately based on observation of nature
while religion is largely based on faith. Conflicts between the two have existed for hundreds of years
and will continue to do so, because of their different concepts of "truth". Nevertheless, reaching a
consensus between science and religion is generally impossible and difficult to achieve, because
each are certain of the validity of their own beliefs.
Undoubtedly, cloning is one of the many disagreements between science and religion that raise
many questions when brought up within society. Articles, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
However, the two do not necessarily repel each other, the meeting point is in a person's perspective.
Religion without science degenerates into superstition, while science without the help of religion
gives rise to materialism and lack of faith. Science, to speak the truth, has only purified and
strengthens the work of religion, whereas religion gives a certain line that prevents science from
becoming inhumane and brutal. The same can be said about the controversial issue of cloning.
Advocates state that cloning improves the overall quality of science and life, while critics stress over
the clone's possible problems dealing with their emotional health and self worth. There is no simple
way to resolve the conflicts between them, and reaching a consensus is generally impossible.
However, the relationship between science and religion can be seen as partners not enemies, as
described by Martin Luther King Jr. when he stated, "Science investigates and religion interprets.
Science gives man knowledge which is power. Religion gives man wisdom which is

The Great Debate : Privatizing Social Security
The Great Debate: Privatizing Social Security The United States' Social Security system was
implemented by Franklin D. Roosevelt on August 14, 1935 as a part of the New Deal during the
Great Depression "to frame a law which gives some measure of protection to the average citizen and
his family against the loss of a job and against poverty–ridden old age." Although the system has
proven to be one of the most popular programs ever established, its future has been questionable for
some time. According to the Social Security Administration (2008), "People are living longer, the
first baby boomers are nearing retirement, and the birth rate is lower than in the past. The result is
that the worker–to–beneficiary ratio has fallen from 16.5–to–1 in 1950 to 3.3–to–1 today. Within 40
years it will be 2–to–1. At this ratio there will not be enough workers to pay scheduled benefits at
current tax rates" (Social Security Administration [SSA], 2008). This issue concerns many citizens,
especially younger generations, and continues to be a hot topic of debate amongst politicians. Many
ideas have been proposed about how to reform the current system. The most popular of these ideas
is to create an entirely new system consisting of mandatory pension accounts which would allow
individuals to accumulate a balance over time with investment options such as stocks, bonds, or
mutual funds. This argument will show why Social Security should not be replaced by a mandatory
private pension system.

Industrial Hemp: The Great Debate
Industrial Hemp The Great Debate
Introduction
Many knowledgeable people who know and understand the potential of industrial hemp are
convinced that it is one of the world's most perfect products. Its fiber makes rope and cloth which is
very strong and resilient and when used to make paper products, the production is far tidier and
much more efficient than using wood to make paper. Hemp is indeed considered one of the world's
oldest agricultural products and hemp has a history in the United States that includes the fact that the
Declaration of Independence and the original St. James Bible are actually printed on hemp paper.
The list of practical uses is lengthy and impressive, but due to drug laws in the United States the
growing of cannabis for industrial hemp uses is illegal; this has been a source of considerable
controversy in the United States. The uses of industrial hemp and the debate as to whether industrial
hemp farming should be allowed in the U.S. will be reviewed and critiqued in this paper.
Thesis: This paper takes the position that industrial hemp should be legal in America, because it has
been proven useful in myriad applications for many years, because it is not potent for smoking albeit
it's from the same species, because it could create thousands of jobs, and because in the fight against
global warming industrial hemp absorbs four times as much carbon dioxide and can produce as
much as four times the fiber than trees can.
The Literature on Industrial

The Great Debate : Essentialism Vs. Dominance
Beep, Beep look out there's a woman on the road. Often time's women are stereotyped as a bad
driver. In the article "The Great Debate: Essentialism vs. Dominance," Courtney Stoker argues that
there is a difference in communication between men and women through two theories. The
Essentialism theory is the thought that men and women communicate differently due to their natural
instincts as the Dominance theory imposes that the difference in communication is due to men's
perceived dominance (Stoker 676). As Stoker compares these theories she makes it clear that neither
had substantial evidence in explaining the differences of gender communication. As Stoker stated,
"But once again, I do not feel as if there is enough evidence to consciously declare one theory
correct" (679). Stoker suggests the two main theories about why men and women communicate
differently are flawed. Stoker is correct that these two theories do not explain every difference of
men and women as they demonstrate behaviors in driving that do not specifically fall into these
theories. First of all men and women drive differently because they show different amounts of
aggression. Aggressive drivers are best known for putting someone else in danger or harm's way
while driving. This type of behavior is found more in men than women while driving. For example,
"When it comes to aggressive driving, however, the majority (54 percent) of drivers cite men as the
most likely culprits of aggressive driving. Compared

The Great Debate: The School Play Urinetown
The final adventure needed to improve my adulting skills was to either attend the Great Debate, or
the school musical Urinetown. Having absolutely no background in theatre, I thought it would be a
perfect way to become more of an adult. On April 20th, I made my way to the Annie Russell theatre
for the first showing of the play. The play was very interesting to say the least. I have never thought
about having a drought so bad that we, as a society, didn't have the luxury of private bathrooms.
With the exception of the upper class (Urine Good Company), citizens were paying to use a select
bathroom that had a line the whole. However, the character portrayed as Bobby Strong stood up to
the U.G.C when Hope Cladwell insisted that he stood up for

Great Political Debates
The Great Political Debate Ben Franklin once said there is only two certainties in life, death and
taxes. Although you may not agree with this statement, it does provide two key topics that are highly
debated amongst parties of the United States democracy. In terms of death, abortion and the death
penalty are debated topics that each party has a different stance on. Those topics are an area of
government that do not have a consensus. When it comes to taxes, every party has general ambitions
on how to treat taxing citizens. Even though there are a multitude of political parties present in
politics today, the only parties that are repeatedly mentioned election after election are the
democratic and republican parties. These two parties usually ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The democratic party relates the issue of abortion in a court case called Roe verse Wade. In this
court case, the US Supreme Court affirmed the legality of a woman's right to have an abortion under
the 14th amendment. As one can see, depending on how you interpret the 14th amendment
determines the outcome of legality. Since the Supreme Court is the final arbiter of the law, the states
must grant the right to abortion, regardless of being a red state or not. Another democratic view on
abortion is that a woman should never have to fear the ability to pay for an abortion. In the
democratic platform for America in 2004 it stated, "we stand proudly for a woman's right to choose,
consistent with Roe v. Wade, and regardless of her ability to pay" (Democratic platform). This is in
opposition of the republican view, as republicans do not want health care providers to provide for
abortions. The democratic view is that all women should have access to an abortion, which is most
likely going to be through health care. Overall, one can see that the democratic view on abortion
differs from the republican viewpoint through the interpretation of the 14th amendment and thoughts
on paying for

Edmund Burke The Great Debate
Politics now a days is hard to understand and when we do understand and want to create change it's
hard to get our government to create change. In "The Great Debate: Edmund Burke, Thomas Paine,
and the Birth of Right and Left," Levin tells the story of an unfriendly rivalry between the
progenitors modern conservatism and modern liberalism. In the time Burke and Paine shared – the
late 18th century – philosophical arguments could ignite revolutions, and pamphlets could be as
important as battles. Both Burke and Paine were masters of political rhetoric at a time when political
rhetoric really mattered, and their rivalry still reverberates. In today's society about conflicts
between the police and minority communities in the US, Burk would take a position that the
american government has to change some laws around in order to create equality and justice while
Pain would take a position of starting all over is the way to go to create something better for all. ...
Burke mentions that "the old and tried model will not always work, of course,but when it fails,
societies would be wise to fix it by gradually building on what does work about it rather than by
starting fresh with an untried idea" (66). By his quote he means that we have laws as well as
expectations that have worked in the past to controlled the injustice happening with our minority
communities but with new generations there's new change to happen because old techniques do not
always work. As "society [is] always changing, its law need to change too"(9) in order to keep a
balance of equality and justice in our society. Edmund Burke position is most likely to benefit more
than Paines because theres is a idea,or vision, set up it just needs some fixing up to make more ideal
for

The Great Debate: Medical Marijuana, Is It Ethical?
The debate on Medical marijuana has been a controversial subject mainly because people have an
abundance of opinions and very little scientific research to back up either side of the debate. The
most important question here is "will medical marijuana be used for medical purposes or will it be
used inappropriately?"
Unlike a person who uses marijuana for medicine or entertainment, some people use marijuana as a
means for income. Honestly marijuana sales is a very profitable business but the problem is that
there is still a numerous amount of people who sell marijuana illegally. Usually with illegal sales of
marijuana also comes other illegal activity. According to the DEA, "marijuana smuggling into the
United States has occurred at ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Today's marijuana is much more powerful and much more addictive than it was a generation ago.'"
"Federal laws classify marijuana as a schedule I drug along with heroin and LSD. Although
marijuana may be addictive to some, the potential for forming an addiction may be lower than with
some prescription drugs." (Live Science) Regardless, the reality is that marijuana IS a drug.
Marijuana is composed of approximately over four hundred chemicals. According to the Mayo
Clinic "Marijuana contains at least 60 chemicals called cannabinoids. Researchers are evaluating
how effective some of these cannabinoids might be in controlling symptoms of certain medical
conditions. For example: THC, an abbreviation for delta–9–tetrahydrocannabinol, THC is the main
component responsible for marijuana's mind–altering effect. It also may help treat signs and
symptoms such as nausea and vomiting that are associated with a number of medical conditions.
Cannabinol and cannabidiol, these compounds have some of the properties of THC, but cause less
psychoactive effects – the high. [...]" Medical marijuana can be used to treat a variety of illnesses
ranging from anxiety to more life threatening diseases like cancer.
A person, in California, who uses marijuana medically agrees to follow the Health and Safety codes
as defined by the Attorney General, Edmund G. Brown Jr., and the Department of Justice (state of

Essay On The Idaho State Standards And The True Story Of...
I have known for some time that my weakest area on Charlette Danielson's Framework for Teaching
is asking questions that require higher order thinking. As a first grade teacher there is so much
information that I am presenting to them that we move at a very fast pace. I am constantly checking
for understanding, but my questions focus on knowledge and comprehension. I rarely take time for
lengthy discussions that allow the children to express their opinions and interpretation of the
information presented. The Idaho State Standards and the Danielson framework make it clear that
this is an area I need to focus on and that I must make time for it in my very hectic schedule. I
developed a plan of action to assist me in this process and set a goal to have 80% of my students
score a 70% or higher on their written reading responses and a 3 or higher on their oral reading ...
We talked about whose point of view the stories were told from, we struggled with this and it
required a lot of modeling and scaffolding, and we also constructed new endings for the stories.
Then we moved on to two new stories, The Three Little Pigs and The True Story of the Three Little
Pigs by A. Wolf . Each time the oral and written responses improved but they still required a great
deal of teacher mediation. The second assessment revealed that only 24% of my student had met the
oral target and 31% had met the written. My kids were making great progress, but we had started out
much lower than I had anticipated.
Day seven brought the great debate. Unfortunatley there was not much of a debate. They all
believed the wolf because the title stated that it was the "true" story. They did however support their
opinions with evidence. They did a wonderful job creating their posters representing the moral of
the story, my favorite was "work hard or be eaten", but we struggled desperately to create interview
questions for the story

Politics And Politics In Aristophanes In The Frogs
Aristophanes in The Frogs satirizes politics and political leaders of Athens. During fifth century
there was direct democracy in Athens. The democratic government of Athens rested on three main
institutions, and a few others of lesser importance. The three pillars of democracy were: the
Assembly of the Demos, the Council of 500, and the People's Court.On the other hand, this is a
democracy without equality. The Assembly is basically gathering of Athenian male citizens to vote
for law. At Athens politics was a kind of communication between the classes; for this reason the
primary political skill was rhetoric. Politics was carried on by constantreference from the few to the
many. The model Athenian political situation is a rhetorical contest ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
It explains why so many plays turn, like the Frogs, on a formal debate. The situation of the play
affects its internal constitution. As drama is analogous to politics, so the dramatic action is
assimilated to political action. For the Athenian audience, the fully expressive mode is competitive
debate.
The Frogs contains the largest number of references to the poet's function as an adviser. The world
of Aristophanes' comedies is mainly one of fantasy, where free men carry private peaces in
wineskins or fly to Zeus on a dungbeetle, women take control of the state, and a slave rides down to
Hades on a donkey(18). But Aristophanes focus in The Frogs is on contemporary politics of real
world. The purpose of The Frogs is to bring reform in Athenian society by satirizing contemporary
politics and political leaders.
Aristophanes gave an advice in the parbasis of The Frogs. This teaching comes most frequently in
the parabasis, where the chorus sometimes speaks in the voice of the poet–producer.
"It is right and just for our sacred chorus to advise and teach what's good for the

2012 Election: The Great Medicare Debate
2012 Election: The Great Medicare Debate
Since 1965, Medicare has been attempting to provide low cost, guaranteed access to much needed
healthcare for senior citizens over the age of 65 and other age groups that suffer from disabilities
and terminal diseases. These people represent some of the most vulnerable population groups in the
United States. Most do not work, and rely on Medicare to provide them the access to healthcare they
need. Unlike privatized health insurance companies, Medicare is a social insurance program that is
paid for through federal mandates and tax payer funds. Billions of dollars are spent annually on over
50 million Americans in need (Alonso–Zaldivar 1). The care structure itself is broken into several
main parts: Medicare Part A covers hospital costs, Part B cover most outpatient care costs, and Part
C and D cover prescription drug costs through dealing with other private insurance. Yet, the
upcoming election in November is threatening to change and alter the structure. Each candidate has
his own plan to deal with Medicare; both are trying to reign in the costs of operating Medicare, but
with some elements being obviously more beneficial for Medicare recipients than others. Mitt
Romney is the Republic presidential candidate who wants an overhaul of Medicare in order to keep
costs down. Romney's approach is based off his running mate Paul Ryan's suggestions. According to
the research, "Romney officials say Medicare savings will come through

The Great Debate to Leave Home
Traversing lands unknown to one before has always been a subject of mystery, as these foreign
sights and wonders give way to many unexpected discoveries to the naïve mind. In any society, the
idea of travelling abroad is still taboo in most circles – the ethnocentric ideals of most traditional
cultures, while not outright forbidding, but still do look down on the practice of leaving home with
goals of success. Whether it be religious thoughts of demons abroad or wanting to keep handy
laborers at home, or any other reason, there is always reason for those wanting to wanting to keep
such virile young at home, and they will often attempt to do so. Those leaving will give up their
identity, but not in any kind of negative way; as they grow, they will find themselves changed by
time, as they embrace the new ideas and rituals of their live–in society. They may go home, but with
the inward change and newfound knowledge, they will not be able to see the world with their young
eyes, as they once had. Overcoming adversity is a manner of mending the word a bit and learning to
adapt to any current situation. Those leaving home are often met with adversity. At the age of
eighteen, the Amish are given a year to live abroad in the modern world. All apathetic novels about
Native Americans aside, the Amish youth are given a serious choice to consider while living out in
the modern world. Both sides are indeed a 'Real World', and they must make a choice, and decide
where they will choose to

The Great Gun Control Debate Essay
Since its creation the firearm has served as man's best means of self preservation, has helped in the
expansion of frontiers, and has served to help many, including Americans, to secure and enforce
their rights and maintain democracy. Even today our military uses firepower to prevent the spread of
tyranny throughout the world. We refer to our troops as "armed forces" and the necessity of
maintaining our firepower has been recognized throughout the human history, which the firearm has
helped to shape. The founding fathers of this nation recognized the necessity of arming the average
citizen to protect the rights so dearly purchased through armed revolution, and it was these men, all
veterans of that revolution, that made it part of our ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In Great Britain, for instance, the crime rate jumped almost forty percent following that nation's gun
ban and seizure (BBC News par. 1). The research that was commissioned by the Countryside
Alliance's Campaign for Shooting showed that the law only affected the legitimate gun owners
rather than criminals themselves (par. 2). The ban was put into effect due to the Hamilton Massacre
when a man by the name of Thomas Hamilton walked into a primary school and left sixteen children
and teachers dead (par. 3). The Centre for Defense Studies at Kings College in London, which
carried out the research, said that the number of crimes in which a handgun was reported increased
from 2,648 in 1997–98 to 3,685 in 1999–200 (par. 5).
It also said that there was no link between high levels of gun crime and areas where there were still
high levels of lawful gun possession (par. 6).
These same people use the argument that only the police should be armed and are our protectors.
But how many times have the police been at the scene of a gun crime before it happened?
One pro–gun advocate, Otis McDonald from Chicago, Illinois, is a 78–yaer–old retired maintenance
engineer. He and his wife live alone in their Chicago home since their three children grew and
moved away. Even with their burglar alarms tied into the police department, McDonald and his wife
don't feel safe in their neighborhood since the two armed robberies that occurred at their

Marijuana: The Great Debate Essay
Super Grass, Ace, Greta, Ganja, Weed, Mary Jane, Dope, and the Herb, are just a few of the modern
terms that today's users call the drug that is marijuana. Research shows that in recent years the use
of this drug has been on the rise, especially among teenagers. Bridget M. Kuehn, MSJ (2011) stated
in her article, "As marijuana use for medical or recreational purposes is debated at state and
municipal levels across the country, use of the drugs among teens continues to climb"(p. 242). In a
survey done by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, 45,000 eighth, tenth, and twelfth grade
students showed an increase in the use of Marijuana in comparison to years passed. From 5.2% of
twelfth graders, 2.8% of tenth graders, and 1.0% of 8th graders ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Although marijuana use was decreasing in 1977, recent studies show differently today. According to
an Article written Bridget M. Kuehn (2013), the opposite results are occurring with media's positive
portrayal of marijuana's benefits ―do to debate on its medical uses. Marijuana use is now on the
rise, with The National Institute on Drug Abuse reporting a steady claim since 2006 (p.429). Kuehn
(2013) Writes, "20.6% of twelfth graders view[...] occasional use as harmful and only 44.1% see[...]
regular use as harmful [the] ... lowest level of marijuana harm perception among High School
seniors since 1979" (p.429). What is the cause of this change in attitude? Some people feel that it is
the media to blame. For example, as states debate legalization, it brings positive media attention to
marijuana use. According to Guy J. Golan (2010) of the Newspaper Research Journal, California's
big decision to be the first state to legalize marijuana in 1996 was a huge start. Other states have
since followed in that same direction, and in result, recent media attention and debate have been
focused on the benefits of marijuana rather than its harmful effects and may have contributed to this
rise in use (p.305). In his article, Golan (2010) comments specifically, "Indeed, coverage of medical
marijuana has been linked to real life consequences regarding drug use" (p. 305). In support of this,
Kristen Gwynne

The Great Homework Debate

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Veronica Smith

More from Veronica Smith (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Great Homework Debate