Aristotle Analysis

Aristotle Analysis
An examination of Aristotle's critique of the different claims to rule reveals that because of our nature as political animals, living the good life is most
practicable under the regime of the polity. Therefore, by separating the utopian theory of a regime and the practicable application, Aristotle shows that
we can live in a state where our virtue contributes to the being of the city, and in the process, bring forth the ultimate goal of the city: achieving
happiness through the good life.
By laying out the case for a ruling oligarchy, Aristotle claims the wealthy regard justice in strictly monetary terms, saying, "[oligarchs] think if they are
superior in one point, for example in wealth, they are superior in all" (Aristotle 103). In other ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the ideal polity, the middle class is the binding glue of moderation among the excess ('the very rich') and the defect ('the very poor'). It is essential to
understand that by applying his ethics to his politics, Aristotle is claiming that we can find the mean between the god–like virtue of his perfect state
through the more practical application of moderation. True, the majority of men who rule in a polity will not be of the most excellence, but they will
be the second–best excellence, which is those in possession of much moderation. By acting as a voice of reason amidst the excessive and defective, the
middle can serve as a barrier against those who would overstep the mean, and therefore act against virtue. This mean of moderation in cities offers the
best chance for the most people to live the good life, as Aristotle reaffirms when he says, "[in cities] moderation and the mean are always best" (Aristotle
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Aristotle Essay
Aristotle (384 BC –322 BC) was a Greek philosopher, logician, and scientist. Along with his teacher Plato (author of The Republic), Aristotle is
generally regarded as one of the most influential ancient thinkers in a number of philosophical fields, including political theory. Aristotle's' writing
reflects his time, background, and beliefs.
Aristotle was born in Stagira, Macedonia. His father, Nichomacus, was the personal physician to the King of Macedonia, Amyntas. At the age of
seventeen, Aristotle left for Athens to study at Plato's Academy. He studied at Plato's Academy for about twenty years, up until Plato's death. Soon
thereafter, Aristotle went to a city in Asia Minor, called Assos, where his friend, Hermias was ruler... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These writings have changed the way the modern world thinks and lives. Aristotle's works encompassed all the major areas of thought, which are
Logic, Science, Metaphysics, Ethics, and Politics. He developed a new, non–Platonic theory of form, created a system of deductive reasoning for
universal and existential statements, produced a theory of the Cosmos, matter, life, and mind, and theorized about the relationship between ethics and
politics and the nature of good life (The World Book Encyclopedia).
His system rivaled Plato's for the next 2000 years. Aristotle was a firm believer that philosophy came from wonder, and that knowledge came from
experience. He had a wealth of knowledge, from his many varied experiences; if he was correct about philosophy coming from wonder, he would
have had to wonder quite a bit. Aristotle was a genius and this is evident in his writings, because the ideas and concepts he proposed in his writing
were hundreds of years ahead of his time. Aristotle learned from the best and taught the best, so his ideas and thoughts were always being challenged,
which made him thrive for knowledge(Young Students Learning Library).
Aristotle is considered by many to be the best philosopher ever. His ideas reflect this title. Aristotle's system of philosophy was never as influential in
ancient times as Plato's. Indeed, Aristotle's works

Aristotle And Socrates
To answer the question, I will be comparing Pericles's, Aristotle's and Socrates's thoughts about whether to think ourselves as friends or as strangers.
Pericles and Aristotle conceptualize political communities largely as associations of friends. Pericles believes that participation in democracy, is in a
way allows Athenians to become great warriors, to develop friendship and to have communal beliefs. Friendship and community are integral to
democracy. Pericles said, a man who is private has no business in Athens. The idea of Democracy is that citizens get the opportunities to participate in
state affairs and help to make certain decisions. Athens is a democratic city, they give equal rights and opportunities to their citizens to participate in
political matters and let their citizens' voice be heard. If you are Athenian citizen, you are very lucky individuals. Socrates on the other hand,
conceptualizes political communities largely as associations of strangers. Socrates believes that it is better to think about ourselves as strangers than
friends. Socrates likes his ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
If they allow others who are not citizens to get involved in the political matters and have a total stranger who has a wise opinion on certain matter,
there will be different and better outcomes. For those reasons Socrates philosophies are the better of the two. Pericles and Aristotle failed in this aspect,
because their idea does not allow everyone to participate in the government, particularly those who are mechanics, even those mechanics who are wise
and can offer innovative ideas cannot participate due to their

Aristotle Essay
Aristotle
In our fast paced technologically advanced society today, our governments have evolved into supposedly well oiled machines effectively managing
budgets, jails, militaries, as well as many other programs. Unfortunately, many of these governments are not as well organized, as they could be.
Democratic countries like France, Germany, and even the United States have some very serious shortcomings to the way their governments are
managed. These problems occur, many times at a very basic level, rather than at the minor details. One problem that is consistent with many countries
is the maintenance of governmental programs over large geographical areas. Many times geographic or social differences within countries are what
cause ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It serves as the final arbiter of problems, and stands above individuals and binds their actions. Laws change habits and training, but are changeable
through certain circumstances and procedures if it is believed to be unjust. The well–being of a society is contingent upon to what extent its citizens
obey the law. A member of thepolis can be defined as someone who can participate in judging (serve as a juror in the court system), and in governing
(serve in public office). A good citizen must possess moderation, prudence, and justice, and must be able and willing to rule and be ruled.
Aristotle defines a constitution as "an arrangement in regard to the offices of the city. By this arrangement the citizen body distributes office, either
on the basis of the power of those who participate in it, or on the basis of some sort of general equality (i.e. the equality of the poor, or of the rich, or
an equality existing among both rich and poor.) There must therefore be as many constitutions as there are modes of arranging the distribution of office
according to the superiorities and the differences of the parts of the city"
(Page 138). He believes that the organization of a state's constitution is directly related to the kinds of citizens that reside in the polis. The constitution
has a direct root to the most powerful or most populated class.
The middle class is where most of the power comes from because they are the majority, and

Aristotle Polity
To Aristotle, the good regimes are the ones that are set up according to the principle of common interest of the people. In the case of democracy, the
rule of the poor and the majority, it is seen as the form of government that involves the selfish good. Aristotle indicated that other types of government
failed to see the pay any attention to the middle class, where citizens are neither rich or arrogant, nor poor or slaves. This ideal body of government not
only selves as the midpoint for oligarchy and democracy, taking the good aspects of both and eliminating the bad characteristics of each, but also
represents the good regime to Aristotle. Aristotle believed that polity is the good regime because it defends the common good of the citizens of the
state. Through the collaboration of the characteristics of democratic and oligarchic government bodies, by having the middle class be the negotiator
between the rich and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although polity is the mixture of both oligarchy and democracy, Aristotle rejects oligarchy because of its inequality in wealth and rejects
democracy because of its equality in freedom and allows everyone to do as they please, with minimal restrictions. The middle class, according to
Aristotle, is not only reasonable but it's also virtuous because there is no excess or deficit in power. Aristotle indicates that polity is the virtuous
form of government because too excessive power, like in a democracy, leads to crime and violence. In the other extreme, the excess of wealth in an
oligarchy, in turn, will also lead to crime. The middle class is the good regime because it is open to the political stability by governing and taking care
of those being governed. Representing the disinterested and fair government, looking for the common good of the people it is in charge of and not for
the benefit of those running the

Aristotle Happiness
Aristotle is a well–known philosopher whose views on virtue differ from other philosophers and whose thinking about happiness involves human
flourishing and well–being. Aristotle wants "Aristotle does believe that there is a higher good of human action: this is happiness" (Lear, 1988, p.
160–61). Happiness comes in many different ways and is different for every person. The way that a person defines happiness is where it gets
complicated because sometimes a person defines happiness in a way that is not thought of as a good thing. Pursuing genuine happiness and a virtuous
like, to Aristotle, are essentially the same things. If you want to pursue one, you must want to pursue the other as well because without the both of them
there will not be ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Eudaimonia translates to happiness. Many believe that eudaimonia is the best happiness that someone should strive for. "According to eudaimonist
virtue ethics, the good life is the eudaimon life, and the virtues are what enable a human being to be eudaimon because the virtues just are those
character traits that benefit their possessor in that way, barring bad luck" (Hursthouse & Pettigrove, 2003). Aristotle believes that this virtue is the
best to achieve because it is what helps to guide you in the right path to true happiness. Being able to achieve that happiness for you and to be able to
show others the way to be able to get that happiness is what his goal

Aristotle Virtuous
According to Aristotle virtue is achieving excellence of the soul. (1) For man to become virtuous they must build habits that model virtuous behavior.
Aristotle believed that moral virtue forms through habit and no one is born virtuous. Under this premise virtue is both learned and practiced through
our behaviors. When one acts in a moral and virtuous way they become more virtuous, the opposite is true also that if one acts in a non–virtuous way
they will learn to become less virtuous. To be virtuous you also must maintain a balance which is called the mean. Aristotle further states that you
cannot merely define virtue in terms of characteristics, you must also specify the kind of characteristic, and that this virtue renders good the thing
itself of which it is the excellence, and performs its function well at the same time.(2) To live in the mean is to be virtuous. The mean is making
choices that are the right amount of virtue, or the correct balance of choices. To act either in excess or a lack of virtue is a vice. It is the ability of
choosing to act in the mean or middle that is considered virtuous. This can easily been in examples, if a wealthy man had the resources to help others
and give some of his money he could be a virtuous man if he did so while acting in the mean. If the same man did not give to charities ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
When one find themselves in a situation of loss or heavy sadness it could move into despair. It is normal to feel some despair with loss, so the
mean would be so grieve then return to a more normal state of feeling in a reasonable time. This would make this vice actually virtuous. The
opposite would cause it to continue as a vice. If someone fell into despair and never recovered from it and let it consume their life this would be a
vice. Another vice of despair would be if someone had a despairing situation and did not react to it at all, or shunned the loss all together this would
also be a

Who is Aristotle?
Aristotle is remembered as one of the greatest philosophers of all time. His ideas on human nature, life and death, politics, and other great topics
have laid the foundation for our world today. Aristotle not only succeeded in the area of Philosophy, but in the studies of History, Government,
Politics, Drama, and to this day he is known as the father of Biology and the sciences. His many great ideas of the world and how we should live our
lives were rarely challenged by others in his time because of how intelligent of a Philosopher he was considered to be. Today,Aristotle's theory of
drama is used screenwriters all over the world, and the outcome from his study of government systems is reflected in the U.S. Constitution. This secular
genius has made a great impact on history. "For, if the inherence of soul in the body is not a matter of nature but like that of knowledge in the soul,
there would be another mode of dissolution pertaining to it besides that which occurs when the body is destroyed." Aristotle once said this in relation
to his theories on Human Rationality. He believed that the soul, or mind, is "the definitive form of the body", meaning that humans would not be able
to function properly without a brain. As we already know, Aristotle was correct. Without a brain to send signals to all parts of our body, we would be
lifeless vegetables without the abilities to walk, talk, dream, or think for ourselves. Not to mention, the brain also must send signals to the

Nicomachean Ethics By Aristotle
In the Book X of the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle concludes that a life of contemplation is the highest human activity. Aristotle states that the life of
reason and contemplation will be the happiest because the gods are the happiest among all of us, and contemplation is characteristic of their own lives.
Aristotle explained this statement in details when he states that the life of contemplation is more Godlike and since God is all–powerful it is safe to
say that this life will lead us to the happiest and best life. These arguments are sound because he believes the life of contemplation to be the best life
because it is the most Godlike. And since it is Godlike it can be considered the best life. This is therefore sound because what is considered ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He explains this by stating that the gods do not have any need to worry about things humans worry about, "will not the gods seem absurd if they
make contracts and return deposits, and so on? Acts of brave men, then confronting dangers and running risks because it is noble to do so? the
circumstances of action would be found trivial and unworthy of the gods" (Aristotle, p.12). Aristotle states that since the gods do not take part in
any of these actions then they are left with only the life of contemplation. Since the life of contemplation is seen as a way of acquiring knowledge
and wisdom, then contemplative life is most worthy of the gods. And since the gods are wise and powerful it makes sense that they are continuously
contemplating. Humans have the mind of fearing the gods and always want to please them. And we since we want to please the gods then we should
follow how they live their lives which is the life of contemplation. Therefore as the followers of the gods it is only reasonable that if the gods live a
life of contemplation we the followers should as

Aristotle Virtue
Virtues dictate all systems of human morality. Aristotle's interpretation of virtue is found in Book II of the Nicomachean Ethics, "the man who
possesses character excellence does the right thing, at the right time, and in the right way." While this holds true, it leads to an ambiguous interpretation.
Aristotle understood virtue as a set of character traits that, once developed, will lead to an overall good character. Core virtues such as respect, loyalty,
and honesty make up the foundation of the virtue theory of ethical thinking. By living an ethical life, a person must demonstrate moral character traits.
A virtuous person lives his life in a sweet spot called the "golden mean" of the two extremes of excess and deficiency. Actions dictated... Show more
Captain Marty was a well–known daredevil skier, who on multiple recorded incidents had flown other Concord flights overweight. Flight 4590 was
attempting to fly with 1790 pounds over maximum structural weight, this was unlawful, but was not an outrageous risk. However, this added
weight caused the centre of gravity of the plane to be pushed dangerously far to the rear. This change in the centre of gravity made the plane more
likely to stall at lower speeds. It was also proven that even in a takeoff with all four engines working normally, they were well beyond the point
where the testing and models had deemed safe. Additionally, as the fuel gushed from the hole in the forward number five tank, the centre of gravity
moved still further back. In no way was Captain Marty courageous when risking the lives of his crew and passengers by approving the extra

Differences And Similarities Between Aristotle And Aristotle
Aristotle and Plato have been two of the most important philosophers, who have transcended their writings to our culture. But inside they found several
differences and similarities.
Ontology.
The fundamental difference between the metaphysics of Plato and Aristotle is thatPlato concepts are ideas, and Aristotle are ways. – Plato thinks that
there are two worlds, sensitive objects (sensible world) and ideas (intelligible world). The latter world is providing a true knowledge, and which we
can only trust, while the second is based onDoxa or opinion.
– Aristotle thinks that there is only one world, the sensible. This world is full of material things with a "form" found in them. But his thinking is not far
from Plato. Aristotle thought forms exist with individuals, but do not disappear with the death of these (though eventually die with the passage of time,
so they are more permanent than individuals, which makes them more real). He also defended the existence of the Unmoved Mover, which does not
belong to the sensible and represents the most real and permanent entity that exists, asthe idea Bien Plato.
Epistemology.
For Aristotle the "forms" are not eternal causes a big difference between these two philosophers in what concerns the soul. Both thought the soul had
three parts belonging to the intelligible world, but for Plato the soul is eternal, immortal, like all ideas, while Aristotle the soul is eternal, it is a "form"
is mortal, corrupted and

Aristotle Piety
Aristotle argues there is a hierarchy to being; meaning some things are more fundamental than others. He believes there must be something on which
everything else depends, and this can be understood by examining definition. A perfect definition should list just those things without which the subject
could not exist without. This passage applies to Aristotle's argument because it deals with clarifying the definition of 'piety'. Socrates says "..you didn't
teach me adequately earlier when I asked what the pious was, but you told me that what you're now doing is pious..", which aligns with what Aristotle
was saying about people (in this case, Euthyphro) suggesting an equivalent notion rather than understanding the basic principle of their ... Show more
In this conversation, they are separating and attempting to define and order the body and the soul based on importance. Socrates and Cebes agree
that the body is mortal and sinful, and the soul is immortal and divine; separating upon the death of the body. Socrates says "Look at it also this way:
when the soul and the body are together, nature orders the one to be subject and to be ruled, and the other to rule and be master." Aristotle may argue
that the combination of body and soul is what makes an entire human, a distinct third being, with no one mastering the other. Socrates and Cebes are
separating two parts of the human and failing to acknowledging the one whole as an individual and complete entity.
To Aristotle, this theory is a declaration of the importance of universals over particulars. For example, Aristotle argues that the universal notion of
beauty and justice originate from observable examples of beauty and justice in this world. This contrasts with Plato's argument that beauty and justice
exist only because they participate in the universal Form of Beauty or Justice. Aristotle's assertion is that we can only conceptualize beauty by
observing instances of beauty, and the universal quality of beauty does not exist beyond this

The Influence Of Aristotle And Aristotle : The Nature Of Man
The founders have very different views on their place in the world and their identity as a man. Aristotle sticks to the truth to man is nature and that as
an individual we have a purpose. Locke's opinion's stray away from Aristotle and thinks of men as understanding themselves through their mind not in
nature. Where as the Puritans agree with both ideas but centralize God and keep their mindset and nature away. Aristotle first disscusses the way in
which a person should stay away from the community of politics: "For this reason, it is not appropriate for a young person to be a person of politics,
since the young are inexperienced in the actions of life, while these are things about which politics speaks and from which it reason."(12) Here
Aristotle expresses his viewpoint of how the young are inexperienced and their mind has not been shown to the world. Which in a way is opposite of
his original claim that living in a community with politics is " good for man" in a way this is true and shows the real world and the importance of
understanding your surroundings, but Aristotle says this is only a good thing if the person has understood nature in itself before trying to understand
the outside political sphere: "Every art and every inquiry, and likewise every action, seems to aim at some good, and hence it has been beautifully said
that the good is that at which all things aim".(11)" Aristotle tries to explain the importance of understanding nature as a action that aims at some good.
Where as Locke disagreed with the point of understanding nature, he focuses on the freedom and relationship aspect of the world: "A state also of
equality, wherein all the power and jurisdiction is reciprocal, no one having more than another."(43) Locke explains that the power of equality should
not under any circumstance come before another quality. Locke states that the power in the states should all have equal representation and
opportunities: " this teaches all mankind, who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health,
liberty or possession."(43) Locke shows that the important asset to life is to treat everything as being one and equal but independent. He

Who Was Aristotle : Who Was Aristotle?
Who Was Aristotle?
Aristole was a Greek philosopher and scientist who is still considered one of the greatest thinkers in politics, psychology and ethics. Some of his
most notable works include Ethics, politics and logic. He was born in 384 BC to Father of Nicomachus and phaestis at Stagirus, and now extinct
Greek colony and seaport on the coast of Thrace. His Dad Nichomachus worked as a court physician to King Amyntas of Macedonia, and from this
began Aristotle's alliance with Court, which really influenced him for the rest his life. While a boy his father died. At the age of 17 his father's friend
Proxenus, sent him to the city of Athens, the intellectual center of the world, to complete his education. He joined an academy and worked with plato
for twenty years. Sadly Plato died an unfortunate death in 347 the ability of Aristotle being chosen would seem to have designated him to succeed to
the leadership of the Academy. But his ways of teaching was too different from Plato so Plato's nephew was chosen instead Aristotle left. He went to
Assus, a city on the northwestern coast of Anatolia He stayed three years and, while there, became friends with hermias and married his ward Pythias,
and He then divorced and married the niece of the King Herpyllis, who had a son named, Nichomachus.
Aristotle went to live in Mytilene because Hermeas was overtaken by the Persians. While he was staying there; he became the tutor of his 13 year old
son Alexander (later known as world

Polis Aristotle
Aristotle contends that achieving human happiness and well being is impossible without living in a city because human beings are political animals
and therefore politics is an elemental part of the good life. Aristotle bases this claim off of the argument that politics and city formation is a natural part
of being human because humans have an inherent impulse to create associations and partnerships that eventually evolve into political communities, or
the polis. These partnerships arise first from two individual's who need each other to survive (1252b) then to households which extend to become
villages (1252b16), to eventually fully formed self–sufficient cities (1252b27). Aristotle's argues that the polis is prior to all other partnerships
(1253a20) because the partnerships are parts that make up the whole, the polis, and therefore all humans are drawn to create and associate with the ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
By virtue of establishing the partnerships as natural, Aristotle is successful in asserting that the political is fundamental to human nature and in order
for individuals to experience the good life they must be members of the city (1253a20). To back this claim, Aristotle uses a metaphor of the city as the
body and the citizen as the limb and argues that comparable to the limbs separating from the body, the individual is not self sufficient when
separated from the city and therefore possesses a natural impulse towards creating and remaining in the polis (1253a25). Furthermore, Aristotle
supports this claim by contending the "one who is in need of nothing through being self sufficient is no part of a city and so is either a beast or a
god"(1253a27). As a result, all individuals need the city to achieve the good life, and if they do not need the city they are not

The Philosophers Of Aristotle, Plato, And Aristotle
"The Big Three" were very influential in Greek Mythology, the same can be said for Greek Philosophy. Just like Zeus, Poseidon and Hades, there was
Aristotle, Plato, and Socrates. These philosophers, Plato and Aristotle were philosophers in ancient Greece who studied ethics, politics, science, and
more. Both Aristotle and Plato had their own beliefs about moral philosophy, but Aristotle's is more convincing.
Aristotle was born in 384 B.C. Stagira, a town that was north of Athens, and was one of the greatest thinkers who ever lived. When he got older he
decided to enroll in Plato's Academy, where for two decades he did his research and taught others. His work contributed to logic, mathematics, physics,
ethics, and many more. He was in fact Plato's student whom both studied under Socrates. He was told by Philip of Macedonia to tutor his thirteen year
old son who later on became one of the greatest military minds in history, Alexander the Great. Even today all of his work is the starting point of any
discussion that involves logic and ethics.
All of Aristotle's research made him come up with his own moral philosophy. He believed that everything in this world has a purpose, or "telos". To
achieve our telos human beings have to gain experience by achieving traits, also known as virtues. There are two different types of traits that humans
have. Intellectual virtues are ones that can be learned for example, wisdom, loyalty, intelligence, curiosity, and technique. Moral virtues,

Aristotle And Aristotle 's Philosophy
Both Plato and Aristotle were prominent philosophers during their time and even today remain some of the most well–known philosophers ever.
Aristotle was a student of Plato's and Plato's influence was noticeable throughout Aristotle's work. Though Aristotle believed and would later teach a lot
of Platonic philosophy, that did not mean that he agreed with everything that Plato taught. One thing that Aristotle would critique about Plato's teaching
was his idea of what he called "Forms" and their role in the world. Although both Aristotle and Plato believed that something 's "form" helped classify
what it is, I found Aristotle's understanding of form to be more convincing because he believed that Forms consisted within the one world in which
we all already live as opposed to Plato who thought that the world of Forms was separate from the world of everything else. Both men make very
compelling points to back up their beliefs, but I just felt Aristotle's theory was more believable.
For Plato, the sense of the "forms" was about the understanding of something higher. Plato believed that, "when one beholds the Forms, one exercises
Pure Reason, and one is like the liberated prisoner [from the allegory of the cave] who gazed upon the trees and mountains in the sunlit upper world"
(Palmer 67). Palmer simplified Plato's conception of the forms in saying that, "Forms are the eternal truths that are the source of all Reality" (Palmer
67). One example that Plato used to show this was by

Aristotle And Virtue
"Aristotle and the Ethics of Virtue and Character" explains the "theories" that make up a moral situation. First, we have expectations for the outcome of
a moral situation to be utilitarian or sometimes produce another desirable result. We also have restraints that govern the actions we make to produce
those outcomes. Last, certain character traits define who is prepared to perform the necessary actions and be content with the results. Aristotle's "The
Moral Virtues" explains how the mean of an excess and a deficit is the virtue. It is nearly impossible to act perfectly within the mean, which is why
Aristotle recommends that one keep away from the extreme that is more opposed to the mean, be wary of pleasant things, and notice the direction
(toward excess or deficit) toward which one, personally, will tend. Finally, in "Habit and Virtue," Aristotle defines virtue as a result of habituation.
Character is developed through the repetition of activities, and therefore the aim of the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Mckenna, believes that flexibility is the most important virtue for a 3/C midshipman. He explained this by noting the unique place of a third class
in a company. First, a 3/C must use the followership learned as a plebe in order to learn from the upperclassmen who run the company, especially
since the youngsters were shotgunned and are having to learn an entirely new company system. But, along with following the 2/C and 1/C, a 3/C
is immediately expected to lead a plebe, which requires flexibility in itself. A 3/C must find the line between being a friend and a superior to the
plebe, sometimes switching between the roles. Mr. Mckenna sees the increase in freedom of 3/C as a difficult increase in responsibility because you
suddenly expected to follow and lead but without as many people constantly watching. If a 3/C is rigid in her ways, she will be unable to follow,
learning a new company's ways, and unable to lead, changing her ways to help develop someone other than

aristotle Essay
Aristotle
Politics
Aristotle in his book politics, argues that the political association is the highest form of
human association , and making all his conclusions based on the assumption that 'polis' is the
best and only sensible political system. He further adds that political association is the most
sovereign and aims at the highest good
Politics is largely an attempt to determine or rather prove that political association is the best
suited way for securing the happiness of its members or as called in 'politics' the citizens .The
interest of the polis and its citizens were seen to be the same since both the city and man aimed
for happiness as the ultimate goal. According to Aristotle, life has no existence outside the... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
If those certain of rationality exist in
these slaves then they are not "natural slaves" and should not be enslaved .
Aristotle's belief that a man can become fully human if he engages in the political
association of the city , gives the state full authority over an individuals freedom.
According to his view an individual could not have any true rational needs or interest outside the

confines of the state, as the result it would be absurd to even desire any kind of individual
freedom in opposition to the state. Aristotle does not draw a line, which the state cannot cross
over an individuals privacy or freedom. A central question in modern day philosophy, is the
extent to which a state can impose itself on the freedom of an individual. As a result it would be
absurd to desire any kind of individual freedom in opposition to the state
A little further down in the book Aristotle argues and puts forward his idea that a new
system of government is required as all the proposed theories and existing governments were not
perfect. Before putting his theory on the table, Aristotle reviews and criticizes the existing
theories and government using there flaws and shortcomings as evidence supporting his case. His
second book concentrates on these flaws, discussing them in further details. He attacks all
theorists proposing abolishment of private property for individuals. Aristotle

Aristotles Vs. Aristotle : Saint Thomas Aquinas And Aristotle
Saint Thomas Aquinas: Saint Thomas Aquinas was a 13th century Roman Catholic Theologian, who spent most of his life, focusing on the existence of
God within the context of reason and faith. This way of thinking began the common understanding that today's Christians would use to ground their
faith in reason, rather than argue it. Aquinas followed a lot of the philosophy of Aristotle, who's works he read while studying in Naples.
Aquinas & Aristotle:
Although Aquinas did learn a lot from the works of Aristotle; they differed in opinion on some key factors. While Aristotle taught nature creates natural
laws, and therefore rules and the rulers of government are such by natural law.
"To say that political society is merely natural is not to suggest that it should only concern man's basic natural needs such as food, shelter, and safety.
The common good that political authorities pursue includes the maintenance of a just society where individual citizens may flourish physically as well
as morally. Politics thus promotes the natural virtues (most of all justice), which are themselves the human soul's preparation for the reception of
divine grace and the infusion of the supernatural virtues of faith, hope, and, above all, charity. The best one can hope from political society is that
citizens will be well disposed to receive the grace available to them through the Church, which transcends politics, both in its universality as well as in
the finality of its purpose according to

Aristotle Essay
Aristotle
Aristotle was born in 384 BC, at Stagira, in Macedonia, the son of a physician to the royal court. At the age of 17, he went to Athens to study at
Plato's Academy. He remained there for about 20 years, as a student and then as a teacher. When Plato died in 347BC, Aristotle moved to Assos, a city
in Asia Minor, to counsel Hermias, the ruler. After Hermias was captured and executed by the Persians in 345BC,Aristotle went to Pella, the
Macedonian capital, where he became the tutor of the king's young son Alexander, later known as Alexander the Great. In 335, when Alexander
became king, Aristotle returned to Athens and established his own school, the Lyceum. Upon the death of Alexander in 323BC, strong anti
–Macedonian
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Aristotle regarded the world as made up of individuals (substances) occurring in fixed natural kinds (species). Each individual has its built–in specific
pattern of development and grows toward proper self–realization as a specimen of its type. Growth, purpose, and direction are thus built into nature.
The most distinguishing of Aristotle's philosophic contributions was a new notion of causality. Each thing or event, he thought, has more than one
"reason" that helps to explain what, why, and where it is. Therefore something can be better understood when its causes can be stated in specific terms
rather than in general terms.
Economics
Economics is a word made up from two Greek words "oikos", meaning household, and "nomos", meaning to manage. From the start, then, the word
"economic" was associated with the close supervision and management necessary to ensure provisions to a community. The management concerned,
however, was that of the "household", so that "economic" was used as equivalent to "domestic", and economics in ancient and mediaeval times was a
term used to distinguish the economy of the household (oikos) from that of the city (polis). For Aristotle, therefore, Economics and Politics meant two
different studies and arts. (Boland, par. 2)
According to Aristotle, we should avoid using the expression "managing" the economy when we mean the political economy. The public community is
not a household "run" by

Aristotle Of Aristotle : Nicomachean Ethics
Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics
Happiness: it's something we humans search far and wide for, to attain before we are called home at death. We go through our daily lives, making
choices, commitments, changes, decisions. We set goals for ourselves, push ourselves, hurt ourselves, inspire ourselves, lose ourselves, find
ourselves...but why? Whether it is a conscious effort or not, no matter who you are or where you find yourself at this very moment, there is one
ultimately satisfying hope that brings us all together as human–kind, and that is to be happy; to be truly, blissfully happy. Aristotle understood this
human condition and developed a wide array of virtues we must seek to follow in order to live a more virtuous life and ultimately achieve the human
desire for happiness. These are his Nicomachean Ethics.
Aristotle was born in 384 B.C. in Stagirus, a Greek colony and seaport on the coast of Thrase. His father, Nichomachus, was court physician to King
Amyntas of Macedonia. The Macedonian Court proved to have a considerable influence on his life. Aristotle's father died while he was a child, and it
was his guardian, Proxenus, who sent him to Athens at age 17. At the time, Athens was considered the intellectual center of the world. Here, Aristotle
joined the Academy to study under Plato. Aristotle attended Plato's lectures for twenty years, eventually lecturing himself, particularly on the subject of
rhetoric. When Plato died in the year 347, Aristotle left the Academy. There

Aristotle Segregates
Aristotle segregates virtues into two categories and they are moral and intellectual. Aristotle believes that moral virtues is a product of habits, while
intellectual virtues come from learning or life experience. He stated that since "nothing...can form a habit contrary to its nature" (Book II, 1), virtues
are only possible to form by habits. For intellectual virtues, it can only be perfected over a period of a time, as well with experience. A more concrete
point that will solidify this conclusion is that virtues are first learnt, then it will be presented, and the everyday life experience of the virtue is in
diversified position and situations will lead a way for development. Aristotle as well goes in detail not just defining virtues theoretically,

Aristotle on Justice
In this paper, I shall address two central contemporary criticisms of Aristotle's conception of justice. These criticisms of Aristotle's account of specific
justice have focused on two central problems. First, Aristotle's insistence that all specifically unjust actions are motivated by pleonexia Pleonexia can
be understood as the desire to have more of some socially availablegood, and is usually translated as greed or acquisitiveness.
Close . Second, Aristotle does not identify a deficient vice with respect to justice. This violates his "golden mean" doctrine with respect to virtue.
Without the identification of the deficient vice with respect to justice, then justice must not be a virtue of character. Due to considerations of... Show
Defending one's home, fighting against invaders, when they are attacking the state to preserve one's family and friends is an example of the
application of these qualifications on the virtue of courage. Considering how this action affects the overall well being of others, we are considering
how the action is generally just. In sum, the distinction being made here is that the same virtue can be seen all by itself, as a part of the character of
an individual only, and where the virtue is in relation to another person in a particular political community, and its effects on the well being of others
in that political community. We have the same state considered from different perspectives. Aristotle says that justice is spoken of in two ways: as
lawful and as fair. I will discuss general justice first in order to distinguish it from specific justice. Generally speaking, general justice is concerned with
the common good of the community. In the Politics, Aristotle refers to justice as being a communal virtue. "Similarly, then, we shall say that virtue has
a just claim in the dispute, since [general] justice, we say, is a communal (koinoniken) virtue, which all the other virtues necessarily accompany"
(Pol.1283a36–39 trans. Reeve [modified]). This communal or relational aspect of justice shows up both in general and specific justice. I shall discuss
the communal or

Aristotle Function
Aristotle explains that anything that is living has a function, or something they're meant to do. He says that what is good for X depends on the
function of X. So the function of a nose is to smell, a good nose smells well or that the nose is virtuous when it smells things clearly because smelling
well is the function of the nose. Similar to the nose, humans also have a function that is specific to the species because the species is alive and has
something they're meant to do.
3.Explain what the specific proper function of humans is and how this leads to happiness being a life lived "...in accordance with virtue."
Aristotle questions what the function of man is; he concludes that it must be something that is specific to human beings. Aristotle uses function to define
a species; each species has a different function that they're defined by because of this humans function cannot be breathing because animals also
breathe. He relieves that only humans have reason, explaining this with the use of a drawing of the soul (which to ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Like all virtues discussed courage is the median, lying between the extremes of rashness and cowardice (rashness being excess amounts of courage
and cowardice being the lake of courage). Due to human beings being different the mean is different for each individual. Because of this one
person's mean courage may be closer to rashness while another persons could be closer to cowardice. It is also important to know that no ones virtue
can be rashness or cowardice. In order to understand virtue context is necessary, who is the person, who is involved in the situation, what is the
situation, must all be answered because all these factors can cause deviations. By knowing what can trigger the vices, rashness and cowardice we can
avoid people/ situations. By cultivating the mean, courage we begin to develop virtue, which allows us the ability to think before acting, therefore
acting with

Ethos, Pathos And Logos In Aristotle : The Means Of Aristotle
Greece gave birth to one of the most famous and influential people to ever live, Aristotle. Aristotle, a great philosopher and thinker gave way to the
development of a work commonly known as "Rhetoric". Rhetoric broke down the argument to its core and devised three parts of any given argument
those were, Ethos, Pathos, and Logos. Each part had its own unique and creative way of affecting the party it's being displayed to, however, Logos
above the other three had an advantage of importance. Logic can be simply defined as a valid way of thinking about something. Logic is needed in
any and all arguments to form a coherent thought, without Logos, Pathos and Ethos have no ground and are useless. Despite emotional appeal
and credibility being extremely effective ways of arguing, Logos builds the fundamentals of arguments and is objectively the most effective. In
the early 1940s, a man named Adolf Hitler seized massive amounts of power and controlled Germany with an iron fist. While Germany was
suffering from the aftermath of WWI Hitler was able to use the crowd's emotions to his advantage. He used his excellent reputation to gain trust
and told the people that they deserve so much more. In an effort to gain power Hitler relied on persuasion in the form of manipulation and
eventually forgot any sense of true reason. While this is impressive and additionally so because he made the illusion of excluding logical
persuasion, it was not without secrets. Despite Hitler's apparent hypnotic charm, his sense of purpose at the origin was equally apparent. Hitler
was not a God, Hitler was not superhuman, Hitler was not able to literally hypnotize his people. This man was simply an extremely effective
strategist. He was able to use reason at first because he had a clear purpose to make Germany what it was and then later when he did that he
disregarded it. However powerful Hitler became, he was limited still by his insistent disregard for his original purpose and thus led to the
degeneration of his country and people. This idea can be seen in the law of charismatic succession, in which the original purpose is lost and the idea
begins to disintegrate and Hitler shows to be an example of that. In the modern era, there exists

Aristotle Research Paper
Aristotle
Eva Rodrigues
Aristotle was known as one of the three most important Greek philosophers along with Plato and Socrates. Aristotle was born circa 384 B.C. in Stagira,
Greece. He had siblings named Arimneste and Arimnestus. His mother was Phaestis and his father was Nicomachus. Nicomachus was the court
physician to the Macedonian King Amynthas II. Aristotles parents died when he was young. His older sister Arimneste and her husband took care of
Aristotle.
Aristotle first studied medicine before he left and studied at Plato's Academy when he was 17. Aristotle was a top student at the Academy. Aristotle then
later stayed on at the Academy as an instructor for 20 years. Although Aristotle was a valued member of the Academy he was not seen as Plato's
successor. This was because of some fundamental differences between their philosophies. Plato believed that true knowledge could only be achieved
through true reason. Aristotle preferred experimentation with real objects. When Plato died, Aristotle didn't take over the school, he went back to
Macedonia where he was soon asked by King Phillip II to tutor his son, Alexander the Great. Aristotle tutored him up until Alexander the Great became
king. Aristotle the returned to Athens.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This is where he spent the rest of his life studying, writing and teaching. Aristotle's main areas of interest were in biology, zoology, metaphysics,
physics, poetry, music, theatre, logic, ethics, government, politics, and rhetoric. Of these, he was best known for his work in rhetoric, metaphysic, and
ethics. Lyceum was known to be the rival school to Plato's Academy. The main difference in the two schools was the curriculum. Lyceum's curriculum
was based on scientific observation and research. The Academy's curriculum was based on

Aristotle And Aristotle On Education
2.2.2 Aristotle (384 – 322 BC)
Another great influence on Education was the Greek philosopher and scientist Aristotle who came later after Confucius, who was born in Stagira,
Chalcidice. Aristotle was first a student in Plato's philosophy school for around twenty years. Later on he was a philosophy teacher in Atarneus which
is located in Asia Minor.Aristotle is known for his school named "Lyceum" which is located in Athens, and he is also known for teaching Alexander
the Great who can later. According to Curren from his writings about "Aristotle on the Necessity of Public Education" and Burnet from his writings
about "Aristotle on Education: Being Extracts From the Ethics and Politics found in the Encyclopedia , Aristotle deceased from the existing idea of
childhood in Greek antiquity at that time, just like his teacher Plato. That philosophy was about children being educated as small adults, and so they
were taught with adult literature considering their minds as able to absorb and task like those of the adults. According to Aristotle, the goal of
education is to struggle to achieve the greatest goodness and happiness being a member in a city. Most of his philosophy about educating children
could be found in the Nicomachean Ethics and Politics; and here he relates to politics as he considers human beings naturally to be political. That is in
the social sense, as no one could become happy outside of a community. A person become an individual when he/she becomes an active

Aristotle Essay
Aristotle
With the possible exception of Plato, Aristotle is the most influential philosopher in the history of logical thought. Logic into this century was basically
Aristotelian logic. Aristotle dominated the study of the natural sciences until modern times. Aristotle, in some aspect, was the founder of biology;
Charles Darwin considered him as the most important contributor to the subject. Aristotle's Poetic, the first work of literary notice, had a string
influence on the theory and practice of modern drama. Aristotle's great influence is due to the fact that he seemed to offer a system, which although
lacked in certain respects, was as a whole matchless in its extent. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Lyceum under Aristotle pursued a wider range of subjects than the Academy ever had. The detail study of nature became very popular among the
students. After the death of Alexander the Great in 323, anti–Macedonian feeling in Athens rose, and Aristotle retried to Chalcis, where he died the
following year.
The natural sciences are concerned with natural objects that are characterized by the fact that they are subject to change. Change is the basic
phenomenon with physics has to deal. So Aristotle's work in physics is devoted to a breakdown of the change and a discussion of his hypothesis.
Matter and form are the material and the formal cause of what comes to be. Aristotle categorizes four kinds of causes.
If a house comes into being, its efficient cause is the builder. Its formal cause is the structure by virtue of which it is a house. Its material cause is the
matter that has received this structure, and its final cause is the end or purpose for which houses exist. In other words the protection of people and
property.
The form of an object helps clear up its behavior. Aristotle calls the forms of living things "souls," which are of three kinds: plants, animals, or human
beings. Because Aristotle believed that the soul is merely a set of determined features, he didn't regard the body and the soul as two separate individuals
that mysteriously combine to from an organism.
Most of

Aristotle : Artificialistics And Natural Functions Of...
In Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle names two types of functions: artificial functions and natural functions (Aristotle, 7). Artificial functions develop
from human activities. In other terms, humans define certain jobs as having certain functions (Aristotle, 7). Basically, they write the description of
each and every job. A teacher's job is to teach. A police officer's job is to serve and protect. These two jobs have certain descriptions because humans
defined them that way. Another kind of artificial function comes from when humans invent something. For example, ifhuman beings decide to invent a
heater, they have to decide what the function of a heater is. If a heater's function is to produce heat, we can assume a heater that doesn't produce heat is
a bad one. The most important of the two functions is the Natural function. These functions are related to the function of artifacts, but the biggest and
most important difference is that they were not given their functions by anything other than nature (Aristotle, 7). When it comes to natural functions, it
is nature that ultimately determines what the function is. Not a human being. A human can surely give a heater its function, but it is nature that
establishes the function of a bumble bee is to pollinate flowers. What Aristotle is trying to indicate, is that a function is directly providing us with
criteria we can use to evaluate whether something is good or bad. This is the point I truly started to understand the purpose

Interview with Aristotle
An Interview with Aristotle on Requiem for a Dream
Interviewer: Hello Aristotle. My name is Christina Dodson. It is an honor and a privilege to get to meet you. I will be interviewing you today about a
movie you just recently watched called, Requiem for a Dream. Let's take a second to refresh ourselves with the movie, shall we?
Aristotle: Why, that sounds lovely. I wouldn't mind a little freshening up to help get the creative juices flowing.
Interviewer: Well good! I would be delighted to take you back through the highlights of Requiem for a Dream. So, let's begin...In this movie there are
two parallel stories that are told. One of those stories is about Mrs. Susan Goldfarb, who is a lonely, widowed mother, living in Coney Island– ... Show
What would you say about Harry's character?
Aristotle: I would say that Harry's character was very tainted and distorted. His only motivation was brought on by his very own pleasure and pain,
which is not in sync with any moral or ethical virtues. "There is nothing by doing which a son will have done the equivalent of what he has received,
so that he is always in debt. For no one could ever return to them (his mom) the equivalent of what he gets, but the man who serves them with the
utmost or his power is thought to be a good man." That is not to be said about Harry.
Interviewer: Harry has a "Dynamite" dream, a vision of a better life that stems from scoring some really good dope, cutting it, and then redistributing it
in order to better himself financially and to get off the streets so he can stop stealing from his mom. He also wants to better his mom's situation, his
girlfriend's situation, and his best friend/using buddies situation. In Harry's mind he's doing something good. How do you feel about Harry's intentions
and his dream?
Aristotle: "Not every action nor every

Aristotle And Aristotle 's Theory Of Moral Virtue
Nietzsche and Aristotle were two of the most significant philosopher of not only their time but their works has lasted throughout the centuries to
influence even some today's greatest minds. Their works however could not be any separated, Aristotle is a prominent figure in ancient Greek
philosophy, making contributions to logic, metaphysics, mathematics, physics, biology, botany,ethics, politics, agriculture, medicine, dance and theatre.
He was a student of great thinkers such as Plato and Socrates. He believes that ethics is a process to finding the final end or the highest good. He states
that although there are many "ends" in life those are usually only means to further ends, our ambitions and wants must have some final purpose.
Aristotle believes that this highest end is that of Happiness. He introduces the concept moral virtue which is the ability to properly control desires to
follow bad actions, and is the focus of morality. Centered on the core of Aristotle 's account of moral virtue is his doctrine of the mean. According to
this doctrine, moral virtues are character traits which are at in–between more extreme character traits. While Nietzsche a German philosopher, essayist,
and cultural critic. He believes that "Good" is originally designated only the right of those individuals with social and political power to live their lives
by sheer force of will. But a "priestly" caste, motivated by their resentment of their natural superiors, generated a corrupt

Aristotle Virtues
There are two kinds of virtues: moral and intellectual. Intellectual virtues are learned by experience and time, whereas moral virtues are learned by
habits and practice. Virtues are not given to us at birth (nature); we have to make our own effort to train ourselves to be virtuous. In the next few
paragraphs, Aristotle emphasizes how pleasure and pain play an important role in how our moral virtues are developed. To explain he uses an
example of a glutton and a temperate person and the pleasure/pain of food. Then he talks about how many people could be just but that doesn't
necessarily mean that they are virtuous. He proceeds to talk about his three criteria to determine if a person is virtuous. First criteria is virtuous people
know that

Aristotle 's Theory Of Aristotle
Aristotle Exam
Similar to the teachings of his mentor, Plato, Aristotle's philosophy finds its answers to major questions from the perspective of the teleological
worldview. In the very first sentence of the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle introduces his teleological world view by asserting that every activity is
aimed at a telos, or end, and how men move from potency to act. Aristotle then proceeds to outline his argument using the Teleological approach as he
tries to answer the question: "what is happiness?" However, he answers it not by explaining what happiness is, but rather how to attain it and live "the
good life".
Aristotle begins his argument by describing the first step on his road to attaining happiness, which involves man as he finds himself. At this stage, man
is in a state of what Aristotle calls "potency". In order to understand Aristotle'sNicomachean Ethics, one must first understand his definition of potency
and how man progresses from potency to act. Potency embodies the potential of a thing, as in the case of an acorn; it has not yet grown at all, but it
has the potential, or potency, to grow. Potency is also often referred to as capacity in Nicomachean Ethics. On the other hand, act is the end of the
movement from potency. However, the act is dependent upon the directions that were taken in the process of moving from potency to act. For
example, that same acorn when moved properly into act will grow into a healthy oak tree; however, it is just as

Aristotle Essay
Aristotle
The primary concern of political theorists is to determine by what form of constitution the state will most likely succeed. According to Aristotle the
definition of political success means the general happiness of the citizenry. Both Aristotle and James Q. Wilson share the belief that molding excellent
character within the citizenry is the first and most important step towards solidifying the happiness of the state as a whole. The basic structure of
Aristotle's philosophies are derived by gathering as much information about the history of a subject as possible (in trying to develop the ultimate
constitution Aristotle went through 150 constitution from historically great nations) taking from the good and removing the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Aristotle proposes that the constituents of a nation establish the character of government and depending on the goodness of the character formed a
political structure either sinks or swims.
What Aristotle is saying is that in order to put together a political system of maintained justice, freedom and order, society must start with the right
materials. The "right materials" are young minds trained to pursue the virtues that comprise excellent adults. The sentence at the end of the first
paragraph of book VIII of The Politics shows the value Aristotle placed on excellent character being a fundamental part of excellent government
where he says the better the character, the better the government. The issue of government policy concerning character formation and the
implications of politicians passing legislation specifically aimed at improving moral character as a means of eliminating social ills is precisely the
same issue James Q. Wilson addresses in his essay The Rediscovery of Character: Private Virtue and Public Policy. Wilson structures his essay by
going through a variety of public problems he believes can only be explained by the deterioration of character in modern America. The first part of
Wilson's essay goes through present government problems within the realms of schooling, welfare, public finance, and crime, at the end of each of
these summaries Wilson comes to the

Aristotle And Samford
When I proposed the question, "If the laws of Samford were causing you to go against your own moral standard, would you break them?" I heard a
variety of answers from different students. However, one individual talked about how by going to Samford, we acknowledge their laws and
therefore are obligated to follow them because we attend this University. He went on to say that we give up certain freedoms when we go into
different places because everyone has differing beliefs about how things should work. He continued by saying that if we have a problem with the
way Samford is run or what they are making us do then we can leave because it is not our job to tell them how to govern, but to find a place that lines
up with how we think a place should... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In order to understand this more completely, Aristotle says, "For even if the end is the same for a single man and for a state, that of the state seems at
all events though it is worth while to attain the end merely for one man, it is finer and more godlike to attain it for a nation or for city–states"
(Nicomachean Ethics, 66). Aristotle believes that the state and the individual should work hand in hand to be successful. Also, he believes that a
human's natural desire is to be happy. Therefore, if the government and the individual were working hand in hand then both parties should be happy.
People are born to be governed, he argues. According to Aristotle, laws should express human nature. The laws should line up with what we believe.
Aristotle also points out that there is no such thing as personal morality. Therefore, no need to challenge the authority of the government. Parts of
Aristotle's view agree with what the person I interviewed said about this question, but other parts do not. Aristotle would agree that you should not
challenge the authority of those governing over you, but he would find out how it fits with your human nature instead of leaving. By saying that he
would leave the school if because their views did not line up, the person I interviewed is admitting that there is a personal

Aristotle Persuasion
In definition rhetorical theory is a theory where the speaker is giving a persuasion to the audience in the form of logical, emotional, and ethical aspect.
Greek philosopher Aristotle is the first person that came to up the idea of the art of persuasion, an art that is use for public speaking, where he explains
that there are three types of persuasion such as, deliberative, forensic, and epideictic. Aristotle also includes that the important element of public
speaking or persuasive communication is the audience. Audience is the most important aspect of persuasion, considering if there is no audience, then
there is no act of persuasion. In the past Aristotle or ancient term and idea of persuasion is considered the most important element of

Aristotle 's Contributions Of Aristotle
Biography of Aristotle
Aristotle Headshot
Aristotle was born in 384 BC, in Stagira, near Macedonia at the northern end of the Aegean Sea. His father, Nicomachus, was the family physician of
King Amyntas of Macedonia. It is believed that Aristotle 's ancestors had been the physicians of the Macedonian royal family for several generations.
Having come from a long line of physicians, Aristotle received training and education that inclined his mind toward the study of natural phenomena.
This education had long–lasting influences, and was probably the root cause of his less idealistic stand on philosophy as opposed to Plato. Aristotle 's
father died when he was a boy, and Aristotle was left under the care of his guardian Proxenus.
When ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While the extent to which Aristotle 's tutoring influenced Alexander 's successes in conquering an empire is disputable, Alexander did try to organize
much of his empire along the model of the Greek city–state.
In 335 BC Aristotle went back to Athens, where he found the Academy flourishing under Xenocrates. Aristotle founded his own school, the Lyceum,
and ran it for twelve years. The school is often called the Peripatetic School, because Aristotle used to like walking around and discusses his ideas with
his colleagues. Peripatetics are "people who walk around." Aristotle would have detailed discussions with a small group of advanced students in the
mornings, and larger lectures in the evenings. During his time at the Lyceum, Aristotle wrote extensively on a wide range of subjects: politics,
metaphysics, ethics, logic and science.
Aristotle agreed with Plato that the cosmos is rationally designed and that philosophy can come to know absolute truths by studying universal forms.
Their ideas diverged, however, in that Aristotle thought that the one finds the universal in particular things, while Plato believed the universal exists
apart from particular things, and that material things are only a shadow of true reality, which exists in the realm of ideas and forms. The fundamental
difference between the two philosophers is that Plato thought only pure mathematical reasoning was necessary, and therefore focused on

Aristotle Citizen
According to the words of Aristotle, a city–state is viewed as a natural organization that is comprised of a large sum of individuals who share a
common goal but hold unique identities. He mentioned the following, "For a city is by nature a mass of people; as it becomes more and more unified,
first the city will turn into a household, and then the household will turn into just one person – for we would say that a household is more unified than
a city, and one person more unified than a household. And so, even if someone were capable of completely unifying a city, he should not do it, since
he would destroy the city." (Aristotle, page 292) The common goal here, is to allow for the city to function and at the same time grow with its respective
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Aristotle addresses the question about who should be fit to rule. He answers this by stating that good ruling is done by those who are intelligent have
learned the necessarily skills to rule a city–state. Aristotle states the following, "First, we must understand the received formulae of oligarchy and
democracy, and the oligarchic and democratic justice; for everyone touches on some sort of justice, but the make only limited progress and do not
describe the whole of what is fully just. Justice seems to be equality, for instance, and indeed it is – but for equals, not for everyone. Again, inequality
seems to be just; and so it is – but for unequals, not for everyone. But these omit this part – equality or inequality for whom – and so make the wrong
judgment. The reason is that they are giving judgment in their own case, and most people are practically always bad judges in their own cases."
(Aristotle, page 302) The passage illustrates the inequality which gives rise to the disproportionate representation of the majority. Given the
circumstances, only citizens (those born from the elite) are the sole commanders when it comes to creating and implementing policies and

Aristotle Analysis

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Trish Shea

More from Trish Shea (10)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Aristotle Analysis