JUS 305 Milestone Three: Draft of International Agencies and Law Guidelines and Rubric Milestone Three is an analysis of international agencies and laws involved in the case. Summarize the location and role of each international law enforcement agency involved in the case. Address the following questions in bullet point format. 1. Identify the laws regarding case-specific violations in the country where the person of interest was or is currently residing. How did these laws aid in the investigation or apprehension of the criminal? 2. Were there any political factors that influenced the facilitation of the crime? Provide a brief explanation. 3. Determine the ability level of the law enforcement agency to effectively mitigate these types of crimes. Provide evidence to support your claim. 4. How did each law enforcement organization aid in the investigation? What were their limitations? 5. Was U.S. law facilitated in all agencies related to this case? 6. Does the United States reciprocate their laws? Use examples to illustrate the extent of reciprocity. 7. Was there a cooperative relationship between the United States and international law enforcement agencies, and is this cooperation still ongoing? 8. How did the United States cooperate with the international organizations in this case? In general, explain how the United States aids foreign organizations in apprehending and enforcing justice. Use examples to demonstrate the United States’ cooperation. Why is it necessary to coordinate and cooperate with international agencies? Specifically the following critical elements must be addressed: III. International Agencies and Law For the following, review the elements of the case regarding the agencies that were involved in the investigation. 1. Analyze the laws regarding the case-specific violations in the country where the person of interest was or is currently residing. How did these laws aid in the investigation or apprehension of the criminal? 2. Analyze the political factors that played a role in facilitating or mitigating the crime. Did the law enforcement agencies involved enforce the regulations or legislation that the United States has regarding these crimes? 3. Determine the ability level of the law enforcement agency to effectively mitigate these types of crimes. What evidence do you have to support your claims? 4. Which international law enforcement organizations assisted in this investigation? How did the organization aid in the investigation, and what were the limitations to their support? 5. Illustrate the extent of reciprocity between related law enforcement agencies. 1. Was U.S. law facilitated in all agencies related to this case? 2. Does the United States reciprocate their laws? 3. Was there a cooperative relationship between the United States and international law enforcement agencies, and is this cooperation still ongoing? 6. Explain how the United States cooperates ...

1. JUS 305 Milestone Three: Draft of International Agencies and
Law Guidelines and Rubric
Milestone Three is an analysis of international agencies and
laws involved in the case. Summarize the location and role of
each international law enforcement
agency involved in the case. Address the following questions in
bullet point format.
1. Identify the laws regarding case-specific violations in the
country where the person of interest was or is currently
residing. How did these laws aid in the
investigation or apprehension of the criminal?
2. Were there any political factors that influenced the
facilitation of the crime? Provide a brief explanation.
3. Determine the ability level of the law enforcement agency to
effectively mitigate these types of crimes. Provide evidence to
support your claim.
4. How did each law enforcement organization aid in the
investigation? What were their limitations?
5. Was U.S. law facilitated in all agencies related to this case?
6. Does the United States reciprocate their laws? Use examples
to illustrate the extent of reciprocity.
7. Was there a cooperative relationship between the United
States and international law enforcement agencies, and is this
cooperation still ongoing?
8. How did the United States cooperate with the international
organizations in this case?

2. In general, explain how the United States aids foreign
organizations in apprehending and enforcing justice. Use
examples to demonstrate the United States’
cooperation. Why is it necessary to coordinate and cooperate
with international agencies?
Specifically the following critical elements must be addressed:
III. International Agencies and Law
For the following, review the elements of the case regarding the
agencies that were involved in the investigation.
1. Analyze the laws regarding the case-specific violations in the
country where the person of interest was or is currently
residing. How did these
laws aid in the investigation or apprehension of the criminal?
2. Analyze the political factors that played a role in facilitating
or mitigating the crime. Did the law enforcement agencies
involved enforce the
regulations or legislation that the United States has regarding
these crimes?
3. Determine the ability level of the law enforcement agency to
effectively mitigate these types of crimes. What evidence do
you have to support
your claims?
4. Which international law enforcement organizations assisted
in this investigation? How did the organization aid in the
investigation, and what
were the limitations to their support?
5. Illustrate the extent of reciprocity between related law

3. enforcement agencies.
1. Was U.S. law facilitated in all agencies related to this case?
2. Does the United States reciprocate their laws?
3. Was there a cooperative relationship between the United
States and international law enforcement agencies, and is this
cooperation still
ongoing?
6. Explain how the United States cooperates with these
organizations. What does the United States do to aid in
apprehending and enforcing justice
for foreign organizations?
7. Why is it necessary to coordinate and cooperate with these
agencies?
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Your case analysis should follow
these formatting requirements: one-inch margins, 12-point
Times New Roman font, and APA-style
citations. Page length requirements: 2–4 pages.
Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in
Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade
Center. For more information,
review these instructions.
Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%)
Not Evident (0%) Value

4. International Agencies
and Law: Case-Specific
Violations
Analyzes the laws regarding the
case-specific violations in the
country where the person of
interest was or is currently
residing, specific to how these
laws aided in the investigation or
apprehension of the criminal
Analyzes the laws regarding the
case-specific violations in the
country where the person of
interest was or is currently
residing, but does not include
information specific to how these
laws aided in the investigation or
apprehension of the criminal, or
analysis contains inaccuracies or
lacks detail
Does not analyze the laws
regarding the case-specific
violations in the country where
the person of interest was or is
currently residing
13
International Agencies
and Law: Political Factors

5. Analyzes the political factors that
played a role in facilitating or
mitigating the crime regarding
the extent to whether or not U.S.
law was enforced in the country
where the criminal resides
Analyzes the political factors that
played a role in facilitating or
mitigating the crime but does not
provide information regarding the
extent to whether or not U.S. law
was enforced in the country
where the criminal resides
Does not analyze the political
factors that played a role in
facilitating or mitigating the crime
13
International Agencies
and Law: Mitigate
Determines the ability level of the
law enforcement agency to
effectively mitigate these types of
crimes and provides evidence to
support claims
Determines the ability level of the
law enforcement agency to
effectively mitigate these types of
crimes but does not provide
evidence to support claims or
determination is cursory or

6. contains inaccuracies
Does not determine the ability
level of the law enforcement
agency to effectively mitigate
these types of crimes
13
http://snhu-
media.snhu.edu/files/production_documentation/formatting/rubr
ic_feedback_instructions_student.pdf
International Agencies
and Law: Organizations
Discusses which international law
enforcement organizations
assisted in the investigation as
well as how they aided and what
their limitations were
Discusses which international law
enforcement organizations
assisted in the investigation as
well as how they aided and what
their limitations were but
discussion is cursory or contains
inaccuracies
Does not discuss which
international law enforcement
organizations assisted in the
investigation

7. 13
International Agencies
and Law: Extent of
Reciprocity
Illustrates the extent of
reciprocity between related law
enforcement agencies
Illustrates the extent of
reciprocity between related law
enforcement agencies but
illustration is cursory or contains
inaccuracies
Does not illustrate the extent of
reciprocity between related law
enforcement agencies
13
International Agencies
and Law: United States
Cooperates
Explains how the United States
cooperates with these
organizations and what the
United States does to aid in
apprehending and enforcing
justice for foreign organizations

8. Explains how the United States
cooperates with these
organizations and what the
United States does to aid in
apprehending and enforcing
justice for foreign organizations
but explanation is cursory or
contains inaccuracies
Does not explain how the United
States cooperates with these
organizations
13
International Agencies
and Law: Coordinate and
Cooperate
Explains why it is necessary to
coordinate and cooperate
between agencies
Explains why it is necessary to
coordinate and cooperate
between agencies but
explanation is cursory or contains
inaccuracies
Does not explain why it is
necessary to coordinate and
cooperate between agencies
13

9. Articulation of Response Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
Submission has major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that negatively impact readability
and articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that prevent understanding of
ideas
9
Earned Total 100%
EDUC 210Early Childhood Project Grading
RubricCriteriaLevels of AchievementPoints
EarnedExcellentGoodSatisfactoryPoorPowerPointDepth of
content; consistent with chosen topic; 10–15-slide length
requirement9 to 10 pointsFollows the submitted topic plan.7 to
8 pointsTopic plan is mostly followed.5 to 6 pointsTopic plan is
loosely followed.0 to 4 pointsDoes not follow the submitted
topic plan.Professional quality of project9 to 10 points
Information is very organized with well-constructed slides.
7 to 8 points
Information is organized with well-constructed slides.
5 to 6 points
Information is organized, but slides are not well-constructed.0

10. to 4 points
The information is poorly formed, appears to be
disorganized.Format: includes cover slide, content, conclusion,
and references9 to 10 points
Includes all 4 aspects.
7 to 8 points
Includes 3 aspects.
5 to 6 points
Includes 2 aspects.0 to 4 points
Includes 1 or no aspects.Project: Use of technology (be creative
with graphics, transitions and slide design )9 to 10
pointsMultiple creative aspects evident.
7 to 8 pointsAt least 2 technology components evident.
5 to 6 points1 technology component evident.0 to 4 pointsNone
present; text only.Spelling and grammar9 to 10 pointsNo
grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors.
7 to 8 points
Almost no grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors.
5 to 6 points
Several grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors. 0 to 4 points
Many grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors.Current APA
Format: References and citations9 to 10 pointsReference slide
with citations present.
7 to 8 points
Reference slide present; no citations.
5 to 6 points
0 to 4 points
No reference slide or citations present.Includes NAEYC
standards 9 to 10 pointsStandards stated and cited in the
presentation.
7 to 8 points
5 to 6 pointsStandards stated but not cited in the presentation.0
to 4 pointsStandards not stated.
CriteriaLevels of AchievementPoints
EarnedExcellentGoodSatisfactoryPoorPaperDepth of content;

11. consistent with assigned topic; 3-page length requirement9 to
10 pointsFollows the submitted topic plan.
7 to 8 points
Mostly follows the submitted topic plan.
5 to 6 points
Loosely follows the submitted topic plan.0 to 4 pointsDoes not
follow the submitted topic plan.Professional quality of paper
(presentation and format)9 to 10 points
Information is very organized with well-constructed paragraphs.
Includes all current APA components
7 to 8 points
Information is organized with well-constructed paragraphs but
does not include all current APA components.
5 to 6 points
Information is organized, but paragraphs are not well-
constructed and does not include any current APA components.0
to 4 points
The information is poorly formed, appears to be disorganized
and no current APA components.Includes NAEYC standards 9
to 10 points
Standards stated and cited in the paper.
7 to 8 points
5 to 6 points
Standards stated but not cited in the paper.0 to 4 points
Standards not stated.Spelling and grammar 9 to 10 points
No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors.
7 to 8 points
Almost no grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors
5 to 6 points
A few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors.0 to 4 points
Many grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors.Correct APA
format (minimum of 3 sources; cover and reference pages; 1
page of content; references cited)9 to 10 pointsAll 5
components present.
7 to 8 pointsMissing 1 component.

12. 5 to 6 pointsMissing 2 or more components.0 to 4 pointsNone
present.Total
Page 1 of 2
EDUC 210
Early Childhood Project Plan
The Early Childhood Project must include practical classroom
applications that could be used in the early childhood setting.
A plan must be approved, resources chosen, an introduction
paper written, and a PowerPoint presentation prepared. Check
the Early Childhood Project Grading Rubric for specific grading
criteria.
Options for Project Topics:
Select one of the topics below to complete your Early
Childhood Project or submit your own topic to your instructor
for approval.
1. Family Involvement. Develop a family involvement calendar
for your preschool program.
a. Write objectives for the program.
b. Develop at least 1 specific activity each month that will
involve families and help provide services to them (devote 1
slide to each activity). Include a Biblical principle for each
month’s activity.
c. Include how you might involve fathers, language-minority
families, and families of children with disabilities.
Need Form on next page first

13. Early Childhood Plan (30 points):
Using this form, indicate the topic and proposed three scholarly
resources for the Early Childhood Project in APA format. A
peer reviewed journal article retrieved from the Liberty Library
would be considered a scholarly recourse. It should be current
within the last five years and should relate to your topic and
early childhood. It is assumed that you will use the textbook
and NAEYC standards in your project. These three scholarly
references are in addition to the text and NAEYC.org.
Name:
EDUC 210 Section :
Topic
Resource 1
Resource 2
Resource 3
· Review the case you have chosen for your final project.
Summarize the location and role of each international law
enforcement agency involved in the case. Address the following

14. questions in bullet point format.
1. Identify the laws regarding case-specific violations in the
country where the person of interest was or is currently
residing. How did these laws aid in the investigation or
apprehension of the criminal?
2. Were there any political factors that influenced the
facilitation of the crime? Provide a brief explanation.
3. Determine the ability level of the law enforcement agency to
effectively mitigate these types of crimes. Provide evidence to
support your claim.
4. How did each law enforcement organization aid in the
investigation? What were their limitations?
5. Was U.S. law facilitated in all agencies related to this case?
6. Does the United States reciprocate their laws? Use examples
to illustrate the extent of reciprocity.
7. Was there a cooperative relationship between the United
States and international law enforcement agencies, and is this
cooperation still ongoing?
8. How did the United States cooperate with the international
organizations in this case?
In general, explain how the United States aids foreign
organizations in apprehending and enforcing justice. Use
examples to demonstrate the United States’ cooperation. Why is
it necessary to coordinate and cooperate with international
agencies?
https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/operation-ghost-stories-
inside-the-russian-spy-case