Wilmington University's dissertation guide for doctoral candidates talks about degree candidacy, planning for dissertation, student responsibility, dissertation outline, dissertation publishing, and additional steps toward achieving a Doctorate in Business Administration (DBA).
For ph d fellows prof jalota, iit kanpurAmit K. Das
Doing a PhD focuses on developing research skills and abilities rather than just acquiring knowledge. The main goal is to become a competent researcher who can independently conduct research in their chosen field. Key abilities developed through PhD coursework and research include breadth of knowledge in the discipline, expertise in a focused area, identifying research problems, conducting research, and communicating results. These skills are largely self-taught through commitment to research rather than directly taught. Developing these abilities through independent thesis research is the primary aim of PhD programs.
The document provides guidelines for students on preparing and presenting their project reports at AIMS Institute of Management Studies. It outlines the structure and formatting requirements for the report, including sections like the title page, table of contents, methodology, analysis, conclusions and recommendations. Technical specifications around font, spacing, pagination and plagiarism are also covered. The guidelines aim to help students understand the framework and requirements of the project so they can assure success in its completion.
This document provides guidance on creating an effective poster presentation. It discusses the purpose of a poster to clearly communicate research findings. The key components of a poster are a title banner, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusions sections. Technical details include choosing print materials, font size for readability, and costs. Presenting research at conferences is a rewarding experience and step toward publication.
Research proposals are documents prepared before a research project begins that describe the proposed research problem, its significance, and planned procedures. They help researchers clarify their thinking and ensure research questions and methods are sufficiently refined. Proposals also allow others to provide feedback to improve the study's design and potential contribution. Students preparing proposals for a dissertation or thesis should carefully choose an advisor and committee who can offer guidance throughout the research process.
The document summarizes a doctoral program in International Business Management offered jointly by the University of Salzburg Business School (SMBS) and the University of the Sunshine Coast in Australia. The 3-4 year part-time program includes doctoral seminars, conference participation, and a doctoral thesis. Seminars cover research methods, statistical analysis, and contemporary business topics. Upon completion, students are awarded a Ph.D. in International Business Management from the University of the Sunshine Coast.
This document provides an introduction to research methods. It begins by defining research and distinguishing between applied and basic research. It then discusses the research process and definitions of research from dictionaries. The document outlines the dimensions of business research and the importance of reviewing literature. It describes turning information into knowledge and the characteristics of scientific research such as being conducted with a clear purpose. The document concludes by discussing the stages of the research process from problem definition to reporting recommendations.
The research proposal summarizes a proposed research study for a sponsor. It includes sections on the problem statement, research objectives, literature review, importance of the study, research design, and qualifications of the researcher. The proposal allows the sponsor to evaluate the research approach and determine if they will fund the proposed study. It provides key details on what the research will study, how it will be conducted, and why it is important, helping the sponsor decide whether to accept or reject the proposal.
For ph d fellows prof jalota, iit kanpurAmit K. Das
Doing a PhD focuses on developing research skills and abilities rather than just acquiring knowledge. The main goal is to become a competent researcher who can independently conduct research in their chosen field. Key abilities developed through PhD coursework and research include breadth of knowledge in the discipline, expertise in a focused area, identifying research problems, conducting research, and communicating results. These skills are largely self-taught through commitment to research rather than directly taught. Developing these abilities through independent thesis research is the primary aim of PhD programs.
The document provides guidelines for students on preparing and presenting their project reports at AIMS Institute of Management Studies. It outlines the structure and formatting requirements for the report, including sections like the title page, table of contents, methodology, analysis, conclusions and recommendations. Technical specifications around font, spacing, pagination and plagiarism are also covered. The guidelines aim to help students understand the framework and requirements of the project so they can assure success in its completion.
This document provides guidance on creating an effective poster presentation. It discusses the purpose of a poster to clearly communicate research findings. The key components of a poster are a title banner, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusions sections. Technical details include choosing print materials, font size for readability, and costs. Presenting research at conferences is a rewarding experience and step toward publication.
Research proposals are documents prepared before a research project begins that describe the proposed research problem, its significance, and planned procedures. They help researchers clarify their thinking and ensure research questions and methods are sufficiently refined. Proposals also allow others to provide feedback to improve the study's design and potential contribution. Students preparing proposals for a dissertation or thesis should carefully choose an advisor and committee who can offer guidance throughout the research process.
The document summarizes a doctoral program in International Business Management offered jointly by the University of Salzburg Business School (SMBS) and the University of the Sunshine Coast in Australia. The 3-4 year part-time program includes doctoral seminars, conference participation, and a doctoral thesis. Seminars cover research methods, statistical analysis, and contemporary business topics. Upon completion, students are awarded a Ph.D. in International Business Management from the University of the Sunshine Coast.
This document provides an introduction to research methods. It begins by defining research and distinguishing between applied and basic research. It then discusses the research process and definitions of research from dictionaries. The document outlines the dimensions of business research and the importance of reviewing literature. It describes turning information into knowledge and the characteristics of scientific research such as being conducted with a clear purpose. The document concludes by discussing the stages of the research process from problem definition to reporting recommendations.
The research proposal summarizes a proposed research study for a sponsor. It includes sections on the problem statement, research objectives, literature review, importance of the study, research design, and qualifications of the researcher. The proposal allows the sponsor to evaluate the research approach and determine if they will fund the proposed study. It provides key details on what the research will study, how it will be conducted, and why it is important, helping the sponsor decide whether to accept or reject the proposal.
This presentation emphasizes key components of Research Proposal, Essentials of Good Research Title, Importance of Title, Framing of Research Title with examples, Importance of Introduction, Statement of Research Problem with examples, Irrelevant Research Objectives, Inter-Disciplinary Relevance, Literature Review, Importance of Research Methodology, Budget and Financial Assistance Required, Limitations, Competence of Researcher, and Funding Agencies.
This document provides guidance on writing a research proposal for health research. It outlines 12 chapters covering key aspects of developing a proposal such as formulating the research problem, reviewing relevant literature, developing objectives and hypotheses, describing the research methodology and implementation plan, preparing a budget, and including appendices and a title page with abstract. The purpose of a research proposal is to communicate the topic of interest and demonstrate the researcher's ability to identify an interesting research question to potential supervisors and donors to obtain approval and support for the study.
Structure for writing a scientific research proposal in biotechnology - pubricaPubrica
• The intention of writing a research proposal in biotechnology is to get approval for research work from a committee irrespective of what you are applying.
• The researcher aims to clearly describe the research in a way that a non-specialist can understand.
• The research proposal in biotechnology must not only define how the research will be carried out but also need to providedetail description about the required timeline.
Full Information: https://bit.ly/2O4LHJS
Reference: https://pubrica.com/services/physician-writing-services/research-proposal/
Why pubrica?
When you order our services, we promise you the following – Plagiarism free, always on Time, outstanding customer support, written to Standard, Unlimited Revisions support and High-quality Subject Matter Experts.
Contact us :
Web: https://pubrica.com/
Blog: https://pubrica.com/academy/
Email: sales@pubrica.com
WhatsApp : +91 9884350006
United Kingdom: +44-74248 10299
This document provides guidance on writing an effective research proposal for funding agencies. It discusses that a proposal should include details about the problem being studied, how the investigation will be conducted, expected results and timelines. It also outlines the key elements that a strong proposal contains, such as an introduction with the research problem and objectives, a literature review, methodology, budget, work schedule and references. The proposal writing process involves identifying an idea, developing a plan, researching potential funders, and writing the proposal. Major funding agencies in India that may support research proposals are also listed.
1) Research is defined as a systematic process of investigation aimed at discovering and interpreting facts. It involves studying a problem thoroughly to find solutions.
2) Knowing research helps managers address problems effectively and make informed decisions. It allows them to analyze information and issues in sophisticated ways.
3) A research proposal outlines the goals, problem, methodology, timeline, and budget of a research study to ensure agreement between the researcher and sponsor.
Mention the Challenges Researchers Face While Developing a Theoretical Frame ...PhD Assistance
PhD Literature Review Theoretical Framework is always found in the initial section of a dissertation, and it acts as the foundation for investigating a problem statement associated with your research. The theoretical framework is also considered as the conceptual structure that guides the research work. It acts as a background that supports your research and shows the reader that you have sound knowledge in the particular research area. It plays a significant part in proving the originality of the research problem. The theoretical framework plays a significant role in guiding the process of a research study.
Ph.D. Assistance:
Ph.D. Assistance serves as an external mentor to brainstorm your idea and translate that into research model. Hiring a mentor or tutor is common and therefore let your research committee known about the same. We do not offer any writing services without the involvement of the researcher.
Learn More: https://bit.ly/34AIryK
Contact Us:
Website: https://www.phdassistance.com/
UK NO: +44–1143520021
India No: +91–4448137070
WhatsApp No: +91 91769 66446
Email: info@phdassistance.com
Mention the Challenges Researchers Face While Developing a Theoretical Framew...PhD Assistance
Researchers developing a theoretical framework for their dissertation may face challenges including a lack of appropriate references, outdated references, insufficient archival data, and difficulties with writing quality. Developing a strong theoretical framework requires identifying the best fitting theories, justifying their relevance, and properly citing and paraphrasing others' work without plagiarism. Attention to writing is important as the theoretical framework establishes the researcher's knowledge and supports the originality and guidance of their study.
This document outlines the key steps and considerations for determining a research design, including identifying a research problem, assessing available information, developing a theoretical framework, and writing a research proposal. The main steps are to identify the research problem, determine the purpose of the research, develop a theoretical framework, define the research question/hypothesis, identify any limitations or delimitations of the study, and decide on an appropriate methodology. Good research requires a clear statement of objectives, an appropriate methodology, unbiased conduct, sufficient resources, and adherence to ethical standards.
The document discusses key aspects of writing a research proposal, including defining research, its purposes and importance. It outlines the necessary components of a proposal, such as an introduction, background, literature review, problem statement, objectives, research design/methods, implications, time budget, and conclusion. The introduction should capture the reader's interest and explain the topic's significance. The background provides context, while the literature review analyzes prior related studies. The problem statement concisely describes the problem being addressed. Objectives clearly define the aims of the study. The design/methods section describes the methodology, while implications discuss the research's potential impact. A time budget breaks down the project timeline. The conclusion reiterates the proposal's importance and summar
This document provides guidance on writing a research proposal. It discusses that a research proposal communicates the research problem, significance, and planned procedures to solve the problem. It is often required to present a brief plan before data collection, by a university, or for funding. The document outlines the key components of a strong research proposal, including an abstract, statement of the problem, significance, background, objectives, methods, work plan, personnel, facilities, and budget. It emphasizes developing clear objectives and thorough methods, justification of decisions, and arranging feedback on the proposal draft before final submission.
This study explored the difference between self-reported workplace happiness and the score calculated from comprehensive survey responses among 225 project managers. It found that self-reported happiness was higher than the score calculated from full survey, indicating potential cognitive biases. Further analysis showed that career perspectives and autonomy were negatively correlated with the difference between self-reported and full survey scores, suggesting they help alleviate overconfidence bias. The study provides insights into evaluating the validity and reliability of self-reported workplace happiness.
This document provides guidance for writing a research proposal in education. It outlines the key sections to include such as an introduction, rationale for the study, literature review, research questions or hypotheses, methodology, expected outcomes, chapter outline, and references. The document explains what information should be provided in each section and formatting guidelines. The overall purpose is to help students structure their research proposal and address the necessary components of this type of academic writing.
The document provides guidance on developing and presenting a research proposal. It discusses that a research proposal communicates a research idea to obtain approval and funding to conduct the study. It should convince readers that the research is significant and address key elements like the title, objectives, methodology, budget, and dissemination plan. Developing a clear proposal helps facilitate smooth conduct of the research project.
This document provides guidance on developing an effective research proposal. It explains that a proposal communicates the research problem and planned methodology to obtain approval and funding. Key sections include an introduction outlining the research problem, a literature review establishing the significance of the problem, objectives and hypotheses to be tested, methodology describing the research design and procedures, a work plan and budget, and qualifications of researchers. High-quality proposals have a clearly defined problem, methodology suitable to address the research questions, and convince reviewers of the importance and feasibility of the study.
The document provides guidelines for writing a research protocol, including defining what a protocol is, its purpose, and key components. A protocol is a plan that demonstrates guidelines for conducting a clinical trial, illustrating what will be done, how, and why. Key components of a strong protocol include the title, administrative details, project summary, introduction/literature review, objectives, methodology, data analysis plan, management, and ethics. The protocol allows researchers to plan their study and serves as a guide.
Choosing a graduate advisor is one of the most important decisions for graduate students. Students should consider an advisor's availability, track record of graduating students, funding availability, reputation in their field, and whether they will be a good fit. An ideal advisor meets regularly with students, has experience successfully advising students through to completion of their degrees, can provide financial support, is well-respected in their area of research, and accepts the student. Considering these factors will help students select an advisor well-equipped to advise them successfully through their graduate studies.
This document provides guidelines for using headings in APA style. It explains that section headings use level one format, subsections use level two format, and subsections of subsections use level three format. The introduction section does not receive a heading. Level 1 and 2 headings are always on a separate line, while level 3, 4, and 5 headings may be on a separate line or at the beginning of a paragraph. Headings are not indicated by letters or numbers.
This document provides an example of an APA paper format. It includes a title page, body of the paper, and references page. The body of the paper should include all aspects of the research process required by the instructor. The references page is developed as citations are used in the body and includes citations formatted in APA style alphabetically by author in a hanging indent format. Proper formatting of in-text citations and reference list entries is emphasized.
This document is a project proposal for developing a "Sylabus Viewer" application. It includes an introduction describing the need for IT skills in Nepal. The objectives are to implement skills gained in previous semesters and fulfill requirements for an eighth semester bachelor's degree in computer engineering. The proposal provides an overview of the project scope, tools and software to be used including C# and SQL, and lists requirements. It seeks approval from the principal and head of the computer department.
Business Research Methods Proposal Outlinetpaterson42
This research proposal aims to determine student support for building a new recreation center at Keystone College. A survey of sport and recreation majors will ask if they favor a new rec center, if current exercise equipment is unsatisfactory, and if an improved athletic facility could attract more students. Supporting literature discusses trends in updated college recreation centers and found facilities can positively impact enrollment and retention, though are not the primary factor for most students. The methodology will use a survey and data will be analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics in Excel to generalize to the population of 65 sport and recreation majors, with a sample size of 52.
This presentation emphasizes key components of Research Proposal, Essentials of Good Research Title, Importance of Title, Framing of Research Title with examples, Importance of Introduction, Statement of Research Problem with examples, Irrelevant Research Objectives, Inter-Disciplinary Relevance, Literature Review, Importance of Research Methodology, Budget and Financial Assistance Required, Limitations, Competence of Researcher, and Funding Agencies.
This document provides guidance on writing a research proposal for health research. It outlines 12 chapters covering key aspects of developing a proposal such as formulating the research problem, reviewing relevant literature, developing objectives and hypotheses, describing the research methodology and implementation plan, preparing a budget, and including appendices and a title page with abstract. The purpose of a research proposal is to communicate the topic of interest and demonstrate the researcher's ability to identify an interesting research question to potential supervisors and donors to obtain approval and support for the study.
Structure for writing a scientific research proposal in biotechnology - pubricaPubrica
• The intention of writing a research proposal in biotechnology is to get approval for research work from a committee irrespective of what you are applying.
• The researcher aims to clearly describe the research in a way that a non-specialist can understand.
• The research proposal in biotechnology must not only define how the research will be carried out but also need to providedetail description about the required timeline.
Full Information: https://bit.ly/2O4LHJS
Reference: https://pubrica.com/services/physician-writing-services/research-proposal/
Why pubrica?
When you order our services, we promise you the following – Plagiarism free, always on Time, outstanding customer support, written to Standard, Unlimited Revisions support and High-quality Subject Matter Experts.
Contact us :
Web: https://pubrica.com/
Blog: https://pubrica.com/academy/
Email: sales@pubrica.com
WhatsApp : +91 9884350006
United Kingdom: +44-74248 10299
This document provides guidance on writing an effective research proposal for funding agencies. It discusses that a proposal should include details about the problem being studied, how the investigation will be conducted, expected results and timelines. It also outlines the key elements that a strong proposal contains, such as an introduction with the research problem and objectives, a literature review, methodology, budget, work schedule and references. The proposal writing process involves identifying an idea, developing a plan, researching potential funders, and writing the proposal. Major funding agencies in India that may support research proposals are also listed.
1) Research is defined as a systematic process of investigation aimed at discovering and interpreting facts. It involves studying a problem thoroughly to find solutions.
2) Knowing research helps managers address problems effectively and make informed decisions. It allows them to analyze information and issues in sophisticated ways.
3) A research proposal outlines the goals, problem, methodology, timeline, and budget of a research study to ensure agreement between the researcher and sponsor.
Mention the Challenges Researchers Face While Developing a Theoretical Frame ...PhD Assistance
PhD Literature Review Theoretical Framework is always found in the initial section of a dissertation, and it acts as the foundation for investigating a problem statement associated with your research. The theoretical framework is also considered as the conceptual structure that guides the research work. It acts as a background that supports your research and shows the reader that you have sound knowledge in the particular research area. It plays a significant part in proving the originality of the research problem. The theoretical framework plays a significant role in guiding the process of a research study.
Ph.D. Assistance:
Ph.D. Assistance serves as an external mentor to brainstorm your idea and translate that into research model. Hiring a mentor or tutor is common and therefore let your research committee known about the same. We do not offer any writing services without the involvement of the researcher.
Learn More: https://bit.ly/34AIryK
Contact Us:
Website: https://www.phdassistance.com/
UK NO: +44–1143520021
India No: +91–4448137070
WhatsApp No: +91 91769 66446
Email: info@phdassistance.com
Mention the Challenges Researchers Face While Developing a Theoretical Framew...PhD Assistance
Researchers developing a theoretical framework for their dissertation may face challenges including a lack of appropriate references, outdated references, insufficient archival data, and difficulties with writing quality. Developing a strong theoretical framework requires identifying the best fitting theories, justifying their relevance, and properly citing and paraphrasing others' work without plagiarism. Attention to writing is important as the theoretical framework establishes the researcher's knowledge and supports the originality and guidance of their study.
This document outlines the key steps and considerations for determining a research design, including identifying a research problem, assessing available information, developing a theoretical framework, and writing a research proposal. The main steps are to identify the research problem, determine the purpose of the research, develop a theoretical framework, define the research question/hypothesis, identify any limitations or delimitations of the study, and decide on an appropriate methodology. Good research requires a clear statement of objectives, an appropriate methodology, unbiased conduct, sufficient resources, and adherence to ethical standards.
The document discusses key aspects of writing a research proposal, including defining research, its purposes and importance. It outlines the necessary components of a proposal, such as an introduction, background, literature review, problem statement, objectives, research design/methods, implications, time budget, and conclusion. The introduction should capture the reader's interest and explain the topic's significance. The background provides context, while the literature review analyzes prior related studies. The problem statement concisely describes the problem being addressed. Objectives clearly define the aims of the study. The design/methods section describes the methodology, while implications discuss the research's potential impact. A time budget breaks down the project timeline. The conclusion reiterates the proposal's importance and summar
This document provides guidance on writing a research proposal. It discusses that a research proposal communicates the research problem, significance, and planned procedures to solve the problem. It is often required to present a brief plan before data collection, by a university, or for funding. The document outlines the key components of a strong research proposal, including an abstract, statement of the problem, significance, background, objectives, methods, work plan, personnel, facilities, and budget. It emphasizes developing clear objectives and thorough methods, justification of decisions, and arranging feedback on the proposal draft before final submission.
This study explored the difference between self-reported workplace happiness and the score calculated from comprehensive survey responses among 225 project managers. It found that self-reported happiness was higher than the score calculated from full survey, indicating potential cognitive biases. Further analysis showed that career perspectives and autonomy were negatively correlated with the difference between self-reported and full survey scores, suggesting they help alleviate overconfidence bias. The study provides insights into evaluating the validity and reliability of self-reported workplace happiness.
This document provides guidance for writing a research proposal in education. It outlines the key sections to include such as an introduction, rationale for the study, literature review, research questions or hypotheses, methodology, expected outcomes, chapter outline, and references. The document explains what information should be provided in each section and formatting guidelines. The overall purpose is to help students structure their research proposal and address the necessary components of this type of academic writing.
The document provides guidance on developing and presenting a research proposal. It discusses that a research proposal communicates a research idea to obtain approval and funding to conduct the study. It should convince readers that the research is significant and address key elements like the title, objectives, methodology, budget, and dissemination plan. Developing a clear proposal helps facilitate smooth conduct of the research project.
This document provides guidance on developing an effective research proposal. It explains that a proposal communicates the research problem and planned methodology to obtain approval and funding. Key sections include an introduction outlining the research problem, a literature review establishing the significance of the problem, objectives and hypotheses to be tested, methodology describing the research design and procedures, a work plan and budget, and qualifications of researchers. High-quality proposals have a clearly defined problem, methodology suitable to address the research questions, and convince reviewers of the importance and feasibility of the study.
The document provides guidelines for writing a research protocol, including defining what a protocol is, its purpose, and key components. A protocol is a plan that demonstrates guidelines for conducting a clinical trial, illustrating what will be done, how, and why. Key components of a strong protocol include the title, administrative details, project summary, introduction/literature review, objectives, methodology, data analysis plan, management, and ethics. The protocol allows researchers to plan their study and serves as a guide.
Choosing a graduate advisor is one of the most important decisions for graduate students. Students should consider an advisor's availability, track record of graduating students, funding availability, reputation in their field, and whether they will be a good fit. An ideal advisor meets regularly with students, has experience successfully advising students through to completion of their degrees, can provide financial support, is well-respected in their area of research, and accepts the student. Considering these factors will help students select an advisor well-equipped to advise them successfully through their graduate studies.
This document provides guidelines for using headings in APA style. It explains that section headings use level one format, subsections use level two format, and subsections of subsections use level three format. The introduction section does not receive a heading. Level 1 and 2 headings are always on a separate line, while level 3, 4, and 5 headings may be on a separate line or at the beginning of a paragraph. Headings are not indicated by letters or numbers.
This document provides an example of an APA paper format. It includes a title page, body of the paper, and references page. The body of the paper should include all aspects of the research process required by the instructor. The references page is developed as citations are used in the body and includes citations formatted in APA style alphabetically by author in a hanging indent format. Proper formatting of in-text citations and reference list entries is emphasized.
This document is a project proposal for developing a "Sylabus Viewer" application. It includes an introduction describing the need for IT skills in Nepal. The objectives are to implement skills gained in previous semesters and fulfill requirements for an eighth semester bachelor's degree in computer engineering. The proposal provides an overview of the project scope, tools and software to be used including C# and SQL, and lists requirements. It seeks approval from the principal and head of the computer department.
Business Research Methods Proposal Outlinetpaterson42
This research proposal aims to determine student support for building a new recreation center at Keystone College. A survey of sport and recreation majors will ask if they favor a new rec center, if current exercise equipment is unsatisfactory, and if an improved athletic facility could attract more students. Supporting literature discusses trends in updated college recreation centers and found facilities can positively impact enrollment and retention, though are not the primary factor for most students. The methodology will use a survey and data will be analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics in Excel to generalize to the population of 65 sport and recreation majors, with a sample size of 52.
The document provides details of a student's school-based assessment project on workplace attitudes and relationships. It includes an introduction outlining the research topic, acknowledgements, a table of contents listing the criteria covered, and sections addressing the project title and aims, methodology used, findings and limitations. The student investigated how skills, attitudes and attributes of employees impact workplace relationships at the National Land Agency. They distributed questionnaires, conducted interviews and observed interactions. The findings suggested staff could improve politeness towards customers, even when faced with inappropriate attitudes. The student recommended maintaining discipline and courtesy in all workplace interactions.
Partial correlation estimates the relationship between two variables while removing the influence of a third variable. It is a way to determine the correlation between two variables when controlling for a third. For example, a researcher may want to know the correlation between height and weight but also wants to control for gender, which can influence bone and muscle structure. Using the data sample provided, the correlation between height and weight was 0.825 but decreased to 0.770 when controlling for gender, showing gender partially explains the relationship between height and weight.
The document describes how to report a partial correlation in APA format. It provides a template for reporting that when controlling for a covariate, the partial correlation between two variables is r = ___, p = ___. As an example, it states that when controlling for age, the partial correlation between intense fanaticism for a professional sports team and proximity to the city the team resides is r = .82, p = .000.
This document provides guidance on formatting a PowerPoint presentation according to APA style. It recommends including an abstract slide to summarize the presentation's key points. Consistent formatting should be used for headings, lists, citations, tables, and figures. Reference lists and in-text citations should follow the same rules as a paper. The document emphasizes adhering to any assignment guidelines and notes that there is no official APA PowerPoint template.
The document discusses the importance of conversations in developing relationships. It notes that while some advocate "selling the sizzle not the steak", engaging in meaningful conversations where common ground is found is better. The results of interviews with people on their dating experiences and favorite companies suggest that conversations matter because that's how relationships are formed. People are more inclined to connect with companies or products that fit their personality or lifestyle.
(revision date 02252014)Introduction to Concept Paper.docxmercysuttle
(revision date: 02/25/2014)
Introduction to Concept Paper Development
and the University Review Process
Northcentral University
The Graduate School
February 2014
Overview of the PresentationWhat is a Concept Paper?Problem Statement DevelopmentResearch QuestionsWhat is a “brief” literature review?What is required in the methods section?A note on alignmentComponent resourcesAvailable Northcentral University resourcesThe University Review Process: An introductionThe role of the Graduate SchoolHow to accept and incorporate scholarly feedbackA note about multiple reviewsSatisfactory Academic ProgressQuestions & Answers
*
What is a Concept Paper?
The Concept Paper (CP) is a “pre-proposal” or abbreviated proposal. A well-done CP is the basis of a strong proposal. Approval of a CP indicates that the research topic and problem are tenable and grounded in recent and key research on the topic.
A Concept Paper must:have problem and purpose statements and research questions in near final format.contain an articulated but not final research design.offer an explanation of how the study will contribute to theory (PhD studies) or practice (Professional Applied Doctorates).be well-written with proper Northcentral University and APA formatting.
*
Problem Statement DevelopmentArticulation of a concise problem statement is key to a successful proposal/dissertation manuscript. The problem statement is a brief discussion and documentation of a problem that demonstrates the need for and importance of the study. Describe and document a problem that leads directly to the study purpose.The problem statement should summarize what we know about an area and what we still do not know. Dissertation research aims to add to our knowledge and fill in some of the “what we still do not know” part of the problem statement. Present a focused problem that leads to the need for a research response. For some degree programs (DBA, EdD) the problem identified might be a practical problem or issue. The problem must be documented and relevant beyond any particular study site.
*
What is Required in the Methods Section?
Because the research plan is in the concept paper stage, a highly detailed research design is not expected. The concept paper, however, provides a foundation for the next step in the dissertation process, the development of the proposal. A well-conceived and well written and researched concept paper serves as a foundation or blueprint for the remainder of dissertation work.In the concept paper include the proposed research method (quantitative, qualitative, or mixed) and present a rationale for the appropriateness of the method and design.Include a brief discussion of why the method/design(s) is chosen over others. Discussion is not simply a listing and description of research designs; rather, elaboration demonstrates how the proposed method and design will accomplish the study goals, why the design is the optimum choice for the proposed ...
This document provides guidance for writing a Masters dissertation. It outlines the aims, styles, milestones, and supervision process for the dissertation. Key sections include supervision, the research proposal, writing the dissertation, formatting and style, citations and references, and submission. Students work with an academic supervisor through meetings to develop a research proposal and dissertation. The proposal includes an introduction, preliminary literature review, and detailed methodology. The dissertation sections cover title page, abstract, contents, introduction, literature review, methodology, findings, discussion, conclusions, and references. Formatting, writing style, citations, plagiarism policies are also addressed. The dissertation demonstrates independent research skills and mastery of the subject area.
This document provides information about the Master of Business Administration (MBA) Project module at Sunderland Business School. It includes details about the module leader and teaching staff, learning outcomes, content, teaching methods, and assessment.
The key points are:
- The module acts as a capstone project for the MBA program, allowing students to complete independent research on an organization or industry of their choice.
- Students will complete workshops on research methods and personal competencies to prepare them for their projects.
- The project will involve a literature review, methodology, data analysis, and recommendations and will be approximately 12,000 words.
- Students will also submit a 2,000 word self-reflection on
Walden University Dissertation Premise .docxlillie234567
Walden University
Dissertation
Premise
Dissertation Premise Page iii
Contents
The Premise ....................................................................................................................................... 1
Completing the Premise .............................................................................................................. 1
Your Supervisory Committee ...................................................................................................... 1
My Doctoral Research (MyDR)................................................................................................... 2
An Annotated Outline ..................................................................................................................... 3
Sample Quantitative Premise .......................................................................................................... 5
Sample Qualitative Premise ............................................................................................................ 9
The Litmus Test ............................................................................................................................ 13
Dissertation Premise Page 1
The Premise
The Dissertation Premise document is used in two ways:
• To identify a preliminary topic (problem) for your dissertation. This topic should be the
product of an initial investigation on your part but will be subject to change and
refinement and will inform the development of your prospectus.
• To help assign the faculty members who will guide your development of the
Dissertation Prospectus. This process varies across different programs, so please follow
the guidance in your program of study.
Completing the Premise
The Dissertation Premise consists of four parts: title, problem statement, approach for the
study, and references. An annotated outline is included in this guide and should be used to create
your premise document. You will also find a sample premise herein to serve as a model for your
work, and a preformatted template is available on the Writing Center’s Doctoral Capstone Form
and Style website.
Your primary goal for the premise is to narrow your dissertation topic such that you have
provided a general sense of the direction of your research by identifying an initial problem to
study. At this point, you do not need to know everything about the research project, especially
the details of your methodology. Many of those specific decisions are made during the proposal
development phase of your dissertation, although some consideration of how you will execute
your study is appropriate from the beginning.
All documents related to your dissertation, including the premise, should follow the guidelines in
the sixth edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association and
should be saved in either a .do.
1
BIRMINGHAM CITY BUSINESS SCHOOL
UNDERGRADUATE/ POSTGRADUATE DEGREES
COURSEWORK FRONT SHEET
MODULE TITLE: Major Project Options 1 & 2 (Dissertation)
MODULE CODE: BUS7048
LECTURER: Dr Peter Samuels
ISSUE DATE: September 2018
HAND IN DATE: Research Topic: Monday 8th April 2019
Research Proposal (25%): 12:00Noon Wednesday 3rd July 2019
Dissertation/Report (75%): 12:00Noon Friday 20th September
2019
(Resit date to be confirmed)
HAND BACK DATE: 20 working days from the date of submission.
Learning outcomes and assessment criteria specific to this
assignment:
Learning outcomes:
By the end of this module, students will be able to:
1. Identify, determine and justify a disciplinary-relevant project, including its aims,
scopes and objectives.
2. Self-manage research, including managing the supervisory process and
reflecting critically on the work undertaken to identify improvements in research
and project practice
3. Understand how to identify and synthesise the relevant conceptual theory and
methodological techniques from the programme pathway, using a range of
sources and data, applying them to a particular topic, case or organisation.
4. Professionally present the analysis of the data and the results of the project,
including drawing appropriate conclusions and providing recommendations and
guidance for managerial judgements and decision making in the chosen
discipline or pathway.
Assessment Criteria:
Assessment criteria are specified in the assessment brief marking scheme depending on
the option chosen.
2
BIRMINGHAM CITY BUSINESS SCHOOL
BUS7048
MSc Management programme
Dissertation Assessment Brief for Options 1 & 2
September 2019 submission
Module Coordinator: Dr Peter Samuels
e-mail: [email protected]
Phone: 0121 331 6962
Room: C242
mailto:[email protected]
3
MSc Management Dissertation Guide
1. The Aim of the Dissertation
The aim of the dissertation is to provide you with an opportunity to further your intellectual and
personal development in your chosen pathway by undertaking a significant practical unit of
activity, having an educational value, and at a level commensurate with the award of an MSc
degree.
The dissertation is one element of your degree where you have the freedom to select what to
study or investigate in your chosen pathway. Because of this, it can be one of the most valuable
learning experiences you could ever go through. Most students, for instance, have used the
dissertation not only to develop a detailed study of a topic that interests them, but also to learn
about themselves and to produce a dissertation which fully demonstrates their intellectual and
personal capabilities.
A subsidiary benefit of the dissertation is that it provides tangible evidence of your abilities and
can be shown to prospective employers to lend further support to your job application.
Option 1 and Option 2
The key d.
Ultimate Guide For Choosing the Best PhD for You.pdfTheAdmitLab
Tailored to Your Individual Journey: Whether you're stepping out of your undergraduate shoes or transitioning from a professional field, this Ebook speaks to your unique situation. It's packed with personalized insights to help you identify a PhD program that echoes your academic voice and bolsters your professional trajectory.
How to select MBA Dissertation Topic | PhD AssistancePhD Assistance
Phdassistance experts are chosen from international and top-ranked universities across the global countries like the US, UK, and India.
For #Enquiry:
website URL: https://www.phdassistance.com/
India: +91 91769 66446
UK: +44 7537144372
Email: info@phdassistance.com
This document provides details for an MBA core course on corporate strategy, including:
- An overview of the course objectives to integrate functional areas and examine strategic analysis techniques from a holistic perspective.
- Learning outcomes that emphasize a holistic analysis approach and understanding strategic planning tools.
- Details on lectures, case studies, presentations, and a final exam for assessment. Students will analyze case studies in groups and individually.
- Guidelines for submitting assignments and expectations for participation and preparation for lectures and case discussions.
The course aims to develop students' strategic thinking skills through interactive case analyses and emphasize the general management perspective.
Doctor of Business Administration Programs of Rese.docxmadlynplamondon
Doctor of Business
Administration
Programs of Research
v2.1
effective July 2019
SCHOOL OF BUSINESS & TECHNOLOGY
Capella University
225 South Sixth Street, Ninth Floor
Minneapolis, MN 55402
DBA PROGRAMS OF RESEARCH
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DOCTOR OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION PROGRAM .............................................. 5
Guidelines ............................................................................................. 5
Definition of Research ............................................................................. 5
DBA Research Philosophy and Framework .............................................. 5
ACCOUNTING SPECIALIZATION .............................................................................. 6
Guidelines ............................................................................................. 6
Theoretical Perspectives .......................................................................... 6
Accounting Topic Areas ............................................................................ 6
Scholarly Journals .............................................................................. 6
BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE ....................................................................................... 7
Guidelines ............................................................................................. 7
Identifying an Issue, Problem, or Opportunity ........................................ 7
Theoretical Perspectives ...................................................................... 7
Practitioner/Applied Research Perspectives............................................. 7
Business Intelligence Applied Research Topic Areas ................................. 8
Scholarly Journals .............................................................................. 8
Example Instruments or Research Methodologies ........................................ 8
FINANCE SPECIALIZATION ..................................................................................... 9
Guidelines ............................................................................................. 9
Theoretical Perspectives .......................................................................... 9
Finance Topic Areas ................................................................................ 9
Scholarly Journals .............................................................................. 9
GLOBAL OPERATIONS/SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT ..................................... 11
Guidelines ............................................................................................ 11
Identifying an Issue, Problem, or Opportunity ...................................... 11
Theoretical Perspectives .................................................................... 11
Practitioner/Applied Research Perspectives........................................... 11
Business Intel ...
chapter 2 What Exactly Is a DissertationAny successful mountainEstelaJeffery653
chapter 2 What Exactly Is a Dissertation?
Any successful mountain climb, whether actual or metaphorical, requires knowledge of the terrain and the environment. The more knowledge, the better the chance of success. No mountaineer would begin a major ascent without a solid understanding of the unique nature of the mountain, its challenges, characteristics, and vagaries. So, too, must a dissertation writer fully understand the nature of the doctoral dissertation. This chapter describes the essence of the dissertation—its component parts, major steps in the dissertation process, and the roles and responsibilities of those involved.
What Is a Doctoral Dissertation?
A doctoral dissertation is a formal document that demonstrates your ability to conduct research that makes an original contribution to theory or practice. It is a partial fulfillment of the requirements for a doctoral degree (e.g., an EdD, DBA, PhD, PsyD, etc.). The term original, according to the Council of Graduate Schools (1991), “implies some novel twist, fresh perspective, new hypothesis, or innovative method that makes the dissertation project a distinctive contribution” (p. 15).
Several types of doctoral degrees exist, such as a DBA, DPA, EdD, PhD, PsyD, and so on. Historically, the PhD was seen as having a greater emphasis on research, whereas various other doctoral degrees were viewed as professional degrees. In recent years, depending on the university and the field of study, these distinctions have become somewhat blurred. The contemporary doctorate in the United States and internationally is structured as education that includes rigorous research experiences in the form of a dissertation that requires students to “generate new knowledge and to develop as individuals who use the power of scholarly inquiry to advance society” (Council of Graduate Schools, 2016, p. 20). It should also be noted that there are doctorate degrees (e.g., JD and MD) that don’t require research in the form of a dissertation.
Increased globalization, proliferation of technology, big data, and the need to be agile in a rapidly changing world has given rise to new conversations about the nature, design, and products of the doctorate degree. There are a number of interested groups studying and debating how the doctorate degree should evolve in the coming years. These discussions are likely to result in a combination of new and current features of a doctorate degree, including research that connects scholarship to a greater sense of purpose within a larger context.
The dissertation document may vary in format, depending on the type of study, but essentially, all researchers define a problem with researchable questions, conduct an exhaustive review of the literature, choose an appropriate methodology, collect and analyze data, and present the findings and conclusions.
The length of dissertations can also vary. No set number of pages is required. It helps to follow the rule of thumb illustrated by this apocr ...
The document describes the Executive PhD Program at Antwerp Management School. It aims to develop the next generation of business leaders by combining rigorous academic research with practical business relevance. Participants gain expertise in their field through membership in Competence Centers and apply their research to address contemporary business issues. The four-year, part-time program involves coursework, supervised research, and defending a dissertation. It provides opportunities for professional growth, knowledge transfer, and becoming part of the faculty. The goal is to produce research that benefits both academia and business.
How to select MBA Dissertation Topic | PhdassistancePhD Assistance
Phdassistance experts are chosen from international and top-ranked universities across the global countries like the US, UK, and India.
For #Enquiry:
website URL: https://www.phdassistance.com/
India: +91 91769 66446
UK: +44 7537144372
Email: info@phdassistance.com
1
Assessment Brief
Module Name:
Module Code Level Credit Value Module Leader STRM059 7 30
Assessment title:
Research Project Report (7500 words)
Weighting: 100%
Submission dates: 7 Jan 2023
Feedback and
Grades due:
Please see NILE under Assessment Information
Please read this assessment brief in its entirety before starting work on the Assessment Task.
Purpose of Assessment
The purpose of this assignment is to enable learners to develop advanced-level independent
research and critical problem-solving skills within a business context. Learners will develop
knowledge of, proficiency in, and application of a range of management research
methodologies including qualitative and quantitative research methods resulting in proposals/
recommendations.
The Assessment Task
In the current international economic environment, entrepreneurs and managers are
frequently required to undertake business planning, project and consultancy work in addition
to their core responsibilities. Frequently, these projects are focused upon investigating new
business opportunities or potential strategic changes in order to create, retain and extend
competitive position.
The assessment task is to produce a 7500 words (±10%) research project report based on an
independent research, which investigates a business/organisational or management problem,
2
issue or challenge, applies appropriate research techniques and analysis, and consequently
informs the development of a business plan and/ or results in recommendations for change.
Where the submission exceeds the stipulated word limit by more than 10%, the submission will
only be marked up to and including the additional 10%. Anything over this will not be included
in the final grade for the assessment item. Abstracts, bibliographies, reference lists, appendices
and footnotes are excluded from any word limit requirements.
Where a submission is notably under the word limit, the full submission will be marked on the
extent to which the requirements of the assessment brief have been met.
Additional Guidance
Projects should be submitted with the UoN Faculty of Business & Law Ethics Form which has
been signed by your project supervisor. The blank Ethics Form, sample Participant Information
and Consent Forms/ Templates are available at the end of this assignment brief. Please see
NILE for additional guidance about appendices.
Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of this assessment, you will be able to:
Subject-Specific Knowledge, Understanding & Application
a) Critically assess and apply theoretical concepts, constructs and models required to analyse
business-related problems, plans and issues.
b) Evaluate and implement appropriate research methodologies to examine management and
business-related issues.
c) Enact appropriate ethical standards and use suitable tools to collect quantitative and
qualitative data.
d) Demonstrate the ability to link question formulation or research aim and objectives to data
analyses, interpretations.
For ph d fellows by prof pankaj jalota, iit kanpurAmit K. Das
Doing a PhD focuses on developing research skills and abilities rather than just acquiring knowledge. The main goal is to become a competent researcher who can independently conduct research in their chosen field. Key abilities developed through PhD coursework and research include breadth of knowledge in the discipline, expertise in a focused area, identifying research problems, conducting research, and communicating results. While research results are important, the primary purpose of a PhD is to gain these foundational abilities needed for a career in research. Developing these skills largely occurs through self-motivated learning and perseverance rather than direct teaching.
MBA Project Report as per Osmania UniversityHammaduddin
The document provides guidelines for students at Osmania University for preparing and presenting their project reports for the Master of Business Administration program. It outlines that the project allows students to independently research and analyze a business problem. It recommends regularly meeting with supervisors and providing drafts. The guidelines specify the project should investigate an applied business issue through critical examination and analysis. It provides direction on choosing a topic, organizing the report, and formatting requirements.
Unlocking the Power of Dissertation Abstracts Professional AssistanceCarolynJanet
Unlocking the power of dissertation abstracts is a transformative process, and seeking professional assistance is key to optimizing this crucial component of academic writing. A well-crafted abstract serves as the gateway to your research, providing a concise yet comprehensive overview of your dissertation.
visit now:- https://www.myassignmentspro.com/dissertation-abstract-help/
This document outlines a career plan and mentor agreement for postdoctoral scholars. It includes sections for developing individual career goals, research and teaching plans, commitments from postdocs and mentors, and annual reviews. The purpose is to facilitate career planning and ensure mutual understanding of responsibilities. Postdocs are encouraged to customize the document to their specific goals and mentorship situation.
This document outlines the policies and procedures for writing and presenting thesis proposals at a university's College of Business Administration. It defines key terms related to the thesis process and groups students into committees of 3-5 members. It specifies that students must be enrolled in designated research courses before developing a proposal. Proposals require an adviser's approval and will be evaluated based on criteria like the topic's originality, literature review, and methodology. Students must present their proposals to a panel and may need to represent if not initially approved. The approved proposal is then submitted to the college library.
The Anglia Ruskin University MBA programme is a fully online distance learning course that provides students with modern management skills and knowledge. The program consists of 8 core modules covering topics like personal skills development, financial management, marketing management, and strategic management. It also includes a dissertation. Upon successful completion, students are awarded a Master of Business Administration degree from Anglia Ruskin University. The program is designed to be completed over a maximum of 4 years through online study materials, tutor support, and discussion forums.
Similar to Wilmington University DBA Dissertation Guide (20)
This detailed guide provides instructors with resources for designing student writing assignments, including genre descriptions and rubrics aligned with the genres as well as other criteria to look for in a writing assignment.
from The Center for Teaching Excellence at Wilmington University
This is a short presentation that gives a overview of how to design writing assignments, including what criteria to asses and how to incorporate graduate competencies and course objectives.
This document provides an example of an APA-formatted paper, including an abstract, body, and references section. The abstract summarizes the paper in less than 250 words. The body discusses following APA guidelines and developing the references page as research is conducted. The references section lists three cited sources in alphabetical order using the proper APA citation style.
This document provides an example of an APA formatted paper. It includes a title page with the title of the paper and author's name. The body of the paper should contain the aspects of the research process as requested by the instructor. The document emphasizes developing the references page concurrently by including an in-text citation every time another work is used, and then adding it to the references page. This approach is recommended to save time versus trying to compile the references later.
Figures are graphical elements like graphs, photos, maps, or drawings that cannot be effectively conveyed through words alone. Figures must not be distorted from their original meaning and any manipulations must be explained in the legend. Figures should have high information value, be the best way to communicate the information, and be easy to read with a clear purpose. Permission is needed to use copyrighted figures. Figures appear after references and tables with consecutive numbers and labels referenced in the text. Each figure is on its own page with a descriptive legend allowing it to stand alone.
This document discusses guidelines for APA editorial style. It provides examples of concise versus wordy writing and biased versus neutral language. Key guidelines covered include avoiding wordiness by being clear, concise, avoiding jargon and noun clusters, using abbreviations sparingly, and choosing specific language to avoid generalizations and bias related to topics like age, gender, or race. The aim is to write efficiently using plain language for maximum understanding.
This document provides guidelines for formatting a research paper according to APA style. It outlines the general structure and formatting requirements, including using standard paper size with 1-inch margins, double spacing, and Times New Roman 12-point font. The paper should include a title page with the title, author name, and university affiliation centered at the top, and a running head on every page. The main body requires the title centered at the top of the abstract page and the first line of paragraphs indented. The minimum sections are an abstract, main body, and references, though tables, figures and appendices are optional.
The document discusses the rules for in-text citations, including when citations are needed, what information should be included in citations, and how to format citations of different sources. Some of the key points covered include placing citation information in parentheses or within the sentence, citing single or multiple authors, handling citations when no author is listed, and citing sources that don't appear in the references list, such as personal communications.
This document provides instructions for students to complete three milestone exercises for an English research paper assignment. The exercises guide students through framing a research question, finding relevant sources, evaluating sources, incorporating sources into their writing, and citing sources properly. For the first exercise, students are instructed to develop two potential research topics and search the library databases to find five articles for each topic. The second exercise has students assess the credibility of their sources by answering a series of questions. They then write an annotated bibliography. The third exercise focuses on selecting quotes, paraphrases and summaries from sources and incorporating them into paragraphs for their paper with proper APA citations.
Plagiarism involves copying the ideas or work of others and presenting it as your own. Most forms of expression are protected by copyright laws. Proper citation is needed when using others' thoughts, ideas, or materials that did not originate from you. Plagiarism includes turning in others' work as your own, copying words or ideas without credit, failing to use quotation marks, providing incorrect source information, or copying significant portions of a source whether credited or not. Plagiarism can generally be avoided by properly citing sources.
This document appears to be a sample APA formatted research paper. It includes an abstract, table of contents, introduction, multiple levels of headings, references section, table, figure, and appendix. The paper demonstrates proper APA formatting for headings, citations, references, and inclusion of typical sections. It provides an example of how to structure and format an APA style paper.
More from Wilmington University College of Arts and Sciences (16)
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UPRAHUL
This Dissertation explores the particular circumstances of Mirzapur, a region located in the
core of India. Mirzapur, with its varied terrains and abundant biodiversity, offers an optimal
environment for investigating the changes in vegetation cover dynamics. Our study utilizes
advanced technologies such as GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and Remote sensing to
analyze the transformations that have taken place over the course of a decade.
The complex relationship between human activities and the environment has been the focus
of extensive research and worry. As the global community grapples with swift urbanization,
population expansion, and economic progress, the effects on natural ecosystems are becoming
more evident. A crucial element of this impact is the alteration of vegetation cover, which plays a
significant role in maintaining the ecological equilibrium of our planet.Land serves as the foundation for all human activities and provides the necessary materials for
these activities. As the most crucial natural resource, its utilization by humans results in different
'Land uses,' which are determined by both human activities and the physical characteristics of the
land.
The utilization of land is impacted by human needs and environmental factors. In countries
like India, rapid population growth and the emphasis on extensive resource exploitation can lead
to significant land degradation, adversely affecting the region's land cover.
Therefore, human intervention has significantly influenced land use patterns over many
centuries, evolving its structure over time and space. In the present era, these changes have
accelerated due to factors such as agriculture and urbanization. Information regarding land use and
cover is essential for various planning and management tasks related to the Earth's surface,
providing crucial environmental data for scientific, resource management, policy purposes, and
diverse human activities.
Accurate understanding of land use and cover is imperative for the development planning
of any area. Consequently, a wide range of professionals, including earth system scientists, land
and water managers, and urban planners, are interested in obtaining data on land use and cover
changes, conversion trends, and other related patterns. The spatial dimensions of land use and
cover support policymakers and scientists in making well-informed decisions, as alterations in
these patterns indicate shifts in economic and social conditions. Monitoring such changes with the
help of Advanced technologies like Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems is
crucial for coordinated efforts across different administrative levels. Advanced technologies like
Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems
9
Changes in vegetation cover refer to variations in the distribution, composition, and overall
structure of plant communities across different temporal and spatial scales. These changes can
occur natural.
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...RitikBhardwaj56
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold MethodCeline George
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP ModuleCeline George
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
2. Table of Contents
The Doctor of Business Administration Degree............................................................................................................3
What is a Dissertation? ..................................................................................................................................................3
Introduction ...............................................................................................................................................................3
Degree Candidacy......................................................................................................................................................4
Planning for the Dissertation .....................................................................................................................................4
The Dissertation Process ...............................................................................................................................................5
General Steps in the Dissertation Process..................................................................................................................5
Choosing a Dissertation Research Problem...............................................................................................................6
The Dissertation Committee..........................................................................................................................................8
Committee Members .................................................................................................................................................8
Qualifications of the Committee Members................................................................................................................9
Responsibilities of the Chair and Committee Members ............................................................................................9
Student Responsibilities...........................................................................................................................................11
Preparing the Dissertation Proposal.............................................................................................................................12
The Concept Brief ...................................................................................................................................................12
The Concept Paper...................................................................................................................................................12
The Dissertation Proposal........................................................................................................................................13
The Dissertation...........................................................................................................................................................14
Implementing the Dissertation.................................................................................................................................14
Dissertation Outline.................................................................................................................................................15
Writing the Dissertation...........................................................................................................................................16
Chapter 1: Introduction........................................................................................................................................17
Chapter 2: Review of the Literature ....................................................................................................................17
Chapter 3: Methodology......................................................................................................................................18
Chapter 4: Results................................................................................................................................................19
Chapter 5: Discussion, Conclusions, and Implications........................................................................................20
Completing the Dissertation ........................................................................................................................................20
Dissertation Submission and Evaluation .................................................................................................................20
The Dissertation Defense.........................................................................................................................................21
Publishing the Dissertation......................................................................................................................................21
Maintaining Continuing Status....................................................................................................................................21
Continuing Status ....................................................................................................................................................21
Leave of Absence ....................................................................................................................................................22
Appendix A .................................................................................................................................................................23
Appendix B..................................................................................................................................................................25
Appendix C..................................................................................................................................................................28
Appendix D .................................................................................................................................................................29
Appendix E..................................................................................................................................................................30
Appendix F ..................................................................................................................................................................31
3. 3
The Doctor of Business Administration Degree
The Doctor of Business Administration (DBA) degree is a professional degree for managers,
leaders, consultants, and educators. It is designed for candidates from private corporations, the
public sector, non-profit organizations, healthcare, and education. The goal of the DBA degree
is to enhance the competencies of its candidates by providing them the skills and knowledge to
make significant management and leadership contributions to their organizations and to help
make those organizations more competitive. It also equips candidates to become thought leaders
within their professions and to teach in higher education.
The essence of the DBA dissertation is combining knowledge from extensive personal
experience with knowledge derived from original research of a practical nature. Due to the
synergy of combining these “ways of knowing,” DBA dissertations can be completed more
rapidly (typically 9-18 months) than most PhD dissertations, which tend to be more theoretical
and less grounded in practice. Thus, DBA dissertation research is both useful and rigorous.
Following the concept of a professional degree, the DBA dissertation may utilize a variety of
models and methodologies. Although some dissertations may develop theory, most will be
applied research which extend or provide empirical support for existing theories and models.
For example, the dissertation may take the form of case study, simulation, policy analysis, or
some other format that fits the organizational research question. Although these research
methods may differ in style and format, the written portion of most of these research projects
should be able to follow the general format described in this guide.
Whatever methodology is selected, the research should be conducted in a rigorous and ethical
manner and should make a contribution both to the candidate’s career and to the knowledge base
within the profession.
What is a Dissertation?
Introduction
The Doctor of Business Administration dissertation is an original, comprehensive and scholarly
investigation that makes contributions to both an academic discipline and to professional
practice. Research for the dissertation is conducted using rigorous research methodologies.
At Wilmington University, the dissertation is a significant piece of scholarly work that
demonstrates the researcher’s skills in planning, analyzing and presentation. It should encompass
the skills and knowledge that the researcher has gained from practical experience as well as from
the program. The research may involve traditional quantitative and qualitative methods and/or
other approaches such as a case study, policy analysis, or a simulation. The research may be
within the candidate’s organization or in some other context. Whatever the methodology used or
4. 4
the venue of the research, the knowledge created should be of value to the industry, the
profession, or the community. The dissertation will be available to the public through
Wilmington University and the ProQuest databases.
The dissertation involves a formal process and has a formal structure. This guide explains the
process for completion and the dissertation format. It provides a set of guidelines for working
with the dissertation committee.
The dissertation committee provides guidance and determines whether a student has successfully
completed the dissertation requirements. Selecting a good committee and establishing a good
working relationship with the committee are crucial to the successful outcomes of the
dissertation process.
Degree Candidacy
Advancement to candidacy marks the official point in a doctoral student’s studies when he or she
begins work on the dissertation. However, keep in mind that there are many opportunities
throughout the coursework to explore the anticipated dissertation topic before formally entering
into candidacy. Students are encouraged to refine their ideas and explore the relevant literature
when such opportunities arise. Students should have selected their research questions before
entering RES 7111, Research Design.
The following requirements are necessary for advancement to candidacy for the Doctor of
Business Administration degree.
1. A student must be in good academic standing and have maintained a minimum of
3.00 GPA upon completion of the 45 required credits of coursework. All courses
must have been completed with a grade of B- or better.
2. Students must have successfully completed the comprehensive examinations.
3. The concept paper has been approved by the student’s dissertation committee.
4. Residency requirements will be met by completing at least 39 credits of DBA
course work at Wilmington University, excluding dissertation credits.
Planning for the Dissertation
The dissertation process is long and frequently arduous. Proper planning can help make that
process smoother and more efficient. As previously discussed, the doctoral student should start
to explore potential research topics during the early courses of the program and is encouraged to
read literature related to his or her dissertation ideas, use those ideas for research papers as
appropriate, and discuss those ideas with faculty and fellow students.
5. 5
Students are encouraged to pose questions about the process to advisors, other faculty, and
students who are farther along the dissertation path. It is also important to develop plans to
organize the volumes of research information that will be collected, stored, and retrieved during
the dissertation process. It may be useful to set up a database of annotated bibliographies for
key sources.
The dissertation is a major undertaking that will incur expenses. Students can expect common
expenses such as printing, copying, and postage. Other expenses may include travel and other
costs associated with the development and administering of surveys or other instruments, and,
potentially, assistance with statistical analysis of data. Students are responsible for the cost of
having an APA editor review their dissertations for format. They may also be required by their
chairs to pay for a general proofreader if their writing is not doctoral quality. Publication costs
will include electronic publication with ProQuest UMI Dissertation Publishing. Binding costs
are optional.
The Dissertation Process
General Steps in the Dissertation Process
This guide will provide most of the information that the student will need to produce a successful
dissertation. Below are the steps that should be followed when the student is ready to start the
dissertation process. The remainder of the guide will provide details for each of these steps. The
student:
1. Schedules a meeting with a full-time faculty member to discuss the student’s ideas for the
dissertation. A concept brief should be prepared for this meeting. The concept brief
should be sufficiently detailed to allow the faculty member to judge if the dissertation
idea is of an appropriate scope, the required information will be accessible, the student
will have organizational support if needed, the student has or can realistically develop the
necessary skills for data collection and analysis, and a dissertation committee with the
appropriate skills and background can be assembled. The brief should be limited to about
five pages, but the student should be prepared to discuss the topic in more detail.
Guidelines for the brief are found in Appendix A.
2. With the advice of a full-time faculty member, selects and recruits a dissertation
committee chair who is a full-time faculty member and, after conferring with the
committee chair, selects and recruits one or two other committee members depending on
skills needed. The student is encouraged to recruit the committee chair before entering
DBA 8000. Committee recruitment is a requirement for passing DBA 8000. A
committee form must be completed and submitted, along with the concept brief, to the
DBA Program Director for approval. A separate form is needed for an outside
committee member. (See Forms tab in the DBA site in Blackboard.)
3. Prepares a concept paper for review by the dissertation committee. Approval of the
concept paper is a requirement for passing DBA 8000.
6. 6
4. Register for DBA 9000 series courses and maintain continuing status through the
research process.
5. Submits each of the first three chapters to the committee when completed. When all
three are completed and approved, this will typically constitute the research proposal.
(Occasionally a different chapter format may be appropriate. If considering another
format, gets permission from the chair.)
6. Submits a Human Subjects form and obtains any other necessary permission to conduct
the research.
7. Conducts the research under the guidance of the dissertation chair and with appropriate
support from and interaction with the dissertation committee. Submits chapter drafts on
a schedule or at appropriate times as determined by the committee chair.
8. Completes the written dissertation according to university requirements and submits to
committee, allowing a month for document review.
9. Modifies dissertation as directed by the committee. Submits presentation slides to the
committee for review.
10. Presents and defends the dissertation results before the committee, colleagues, and other
interested parties at least three weeks before the end of the semester. Modifies if
necessary to gain approval. Submits drafts and final document to SafeAssign to check
for proper citations.
11. Arranges and pays for an APA editor to review the final document.
12. Submits the Dissertation to ProQuest after obtaining signatures on modified document.
Signatures and submission to ProQuest must take place at least two weeks before
Commencement.
Choosing a Dissertation Research Problem
The choice of a research problem is of the utmost importance in the dissertation process. It must
meet the student’s interests and career goals as well as the goals of the DBA program. It is
recommended that the target research problem be selected before entering RES 7111.
What is a suitable DBA research question?
1) Manageable
Data can be collected in six months or less, preferably less than three months
Researcher has access to the target population or ex post facto data
Data can be collected at moderate cost
Question is clear and narrow
Student has or can develop skills required to collect and analyze data with minimal
guidance
Researcher is capable of viewing the subject objectively
2) Useful to practice
Provides value beyond the student’s organization
With suitable disguising of identities, can be made public
7. 7
Helps resolve uncertainty, explain important phenomenon, or provide a tool/guidance
Builds on the work, theories, or practices of others
Has strong internal validity
3) Builds on the student’s industry/professional expertise
Note: For students who teach or plan to teach in higher education, it is recommended that the
student enhance “academic qualification” by conducting research within the student’s main
discipline, such as accounting, marketing, or organizational behavior. Being academically
qualified can be an important factor in accreditation processes. Often, colleges hire faculty to fill
disciplinary slots rather than hiring generalists.
What are some typical research topics?
This table looks at some typical DBA research topics and relevant points that would need to be
covered briefly in the research proposal introduction and more in depth in the literature review,
in addition to the generic points as detailed in the Dissertation Guide. Examples of dissertations
which follow a particular model are provided.
The purpose of this table is to help you structure your search of the literature. Examples of these
research types can be found in the “Examples” tab in the DBA website.
Common Research Types Key Points to be Covered in the Research Proposal
Case Analysis
How well does a particular theory
explain one or more cases of
interest?
Why is the topic important for practitioners?
What is the theory and why is it relevant?
What have other researchers established and/or what are the common practices
and assumptions?
What are the gaps, limits, and controversies with respect to current knowledge
on the topic/application of the theory?
Why is this case relevant for study?
Social Interpretation
How do one or more groups
perceive the nature, causes, and/or
outcomes of a certain
phenomenon, practice, or policy?
Why is the topic important for practitioners?
What have other researchers established and/or what are the professional
assumptions? Is there a relevant theory?
What are the gaps, limits, and controversies with respect to current knowledge
and practices?
Why is it useful to study this group (or groups)?
Practitioner Assistance
What new tool, technique,
knowledge, or process would help
practitioners in a particular
situation?
Why is the topic important for practitioners?
What evidence from other sources shows that current tools, techniques,
knowledge, or processes need improvement?
What have other scholars, practitioners, or relevant bodies proposed as
solutions? What are the theories, if any?
How will your study complement, support, or dispute these proposed
solutions?
8. 8
Controlled Experiment
To what extent did a change or
different
approaches/characteristics
correlate with different outcomes?
Why is the topic important for practitioners?
What have other researchers established and/or what are the professional
assumptions? Is there a relevant theory?
What are the gaps, limits, and controversies with respect to current knowledge
and practices?
Why is it useful to study this group (or groups)?
Designed Intervention
To what extent did a different
approach achieve the results
predicted based on literature?
Why is the topic important for practitioners?
What is the theory or professional assumption?
What are the gaps, limits, and controversies with respect to current knowledge
and practices?
What is the prediction and the basis for the prediction?
What alternative explanations will be examined?
What is the value of testing this theory or assumption in the selected case(s)?
Critical Evaluation
How well has a practice or policy
worked OR what are the
advantages and disadvantages of
policy alternatives?
Why is the topic important for practitioners?
What have other researchers asserted and/or what are the professional
assumptions? Are there relevant theories?
Why does this case or sample provide a useful test/analysis?
Exploratory
What are the characteristics and
dynamics of a new or poorly
understood practitioner problem?
Why is the topic important for practitioners?
What have other researchers established and/or what are the professional
assumptions? Is there a relevant theory?
What are the gaps, limits, and controversies?
Why is this case or sample appropriate?
Ethics
Research involving human subjects must meet ethical standards. Such research must be
conducted in a manner consistent with the policies established by the university’s Human
Subjects Review Committee (HSRC). Those policies and procedures are outlined in Appendix
B. The complete policy and procedures along with the forms for permission and documentation
are found on the DBA program Blackboard site. HSRC forms must be filled out even for
research that does not involve people. In many cases, the submission will be judged to be
exempt or expedited and will not require review by the full HSRC. If review by the full HSRC is
required, this could take 1-2 months. Your form must be approved prior to collecting data.
The Dissertation Committee
Committee Members
The dissertation committee will consist of two or three members. The committee chair should be
a full-time faculty member from Wilmington University, not necessarily from the College of
Business. A second member may be a full-time faculty or staff member or an adjunct faculty
member of Wilmington University, and the third member (if desired) may be from outside or
inside the university and should be recommended by the student. Outside members must be
approved by the DBA Program Director. Each committee member should represent knowledge
9. 9
or skills that are relevant for the dissertation. A two-member committee may be used if those
members provide the necessary skills and background. The dissertation committee must be
complete prior to their approval of the concept paper.
The student has the responsibility to form the dissertation committee, including recruiting the
committee chair. An online faculty directory is available which details education, experience,
and interests of full-time and adjunct faculty members. The link for this directory can be found
on the DBA website. The student is responsible for identifying the outside committee member,
if desired, and for obtaining a curriculum vitae and/or other documentation of this person’s
qualifications. It is not necessary to provide such information on internal committee members.
The committee form must be sent to the Director along with the concept brief for approval. (See
the Forms section of the DBA Blackboard site.)
Qualifications of the Committee Members
The committee chair and a second committee member must possess earned doctoral degrees. It
is strongly preferred that the third committee member also have an earned doctoral degree,
however, exceptions may be made if that individual possesses unique content expertise and
experience related to the dissertation topic.
The committee members collectively must have expertise in the dissertation field and the
proposed research methodology. An external committee member may be a content expert,
researcher, business professional, or professor at another university. An external person may be
deemed eligible for committee membership based on expertise which is specific to the
dissertation topic or methodology, but must submit curriculum vitae to the university. At least
one committee member must have expertise in the proposed dissertation research methodology.
All committee members should function as resources and provide counseling and guidance in
their areas of expertise. Committee members are not merely “readers.” Although committee
members will not be interacting with the student as frequently as the chair, it is expected that
committee members will be providing meaningful input at least every other month (assuming
that the student is actively conducting research).
Committee members must not have a relationship with the candidate that poses a potential
conflict of interest (e.g., job supervisor, friend, or colleague). The DBA director will approve
committee membership.
Responsibilities of the Chair and Committee Members
A description of the committee members and their respective responsibilities follows.
1. One full-time faculty in the College of Business or of Wilmington University will
normally act as the committee chair.
Responsibilities of committee chair:
a) Help the student clarify and refine the dissertation topic.
b) Help the student with selection of the other committee members.
10. 10
c) Help the student establish and maintain a dissertation time line.
d) Utilizing input from all parties, structure roles, procedures and expectations for
the student and the committee
e) Guide the student through the proposal process and issue formal approval with the
concurrence of the other committee members.
f) Guide the student through the structure of the respective dissertation chapters and
assure that there is agreement regarding expectations of quality.
g) Nurture and support the student’s transition to an independent researcher.
h) Chair the student’s dissertation defense.
2. The second committee member will be a full-time or adjunct member of the
university faculty or staff.
Responsibilities of the second committee member:
a) Provide expertise in the content area of the dissertation or the methodology used.
b) Be actively involved in evaluation and approval of the research proposal.
c) Provide guidance and counseling in his or her area of expertise throughout the
dissertation process.
d) Read and critique the student’s drafts and completed dissertation.
e) Participate in the student’s dissertation defense.
3. The third committee member should be a specialist with expertise in a field of study closely
related to the student’s dissertation topic and will usually be from outside the university.
Responsibilities of the third committee member:
a) Provide expertise in the content area of the dissertation or the methodology used.
b) Be actively involved in evaluation and approval of the research proposal.
c) Provide guidance and counseling in his or her area of expertise throughout the
dissertation process.
d) Read and critique the student’s drafts and completed dissertation.
e) Participate in the student’s dissertation defense.
What don’t committee members do?
Committee members do not:
Read, organize, or critique the literature
Design instruments
Provide instant turnaround on documents or questions
Run calculations
Check calculations
Provide a proofreading service
The committee members are advisors and evaluators. They are not co-researchers.
The committee may require the student to hire a statistics expert to check the calculations and/or
11. 11
a proofreader. However, the student is responsible for developing expertise in the methodology
and analysis procedures used and for explaining and defending these procedures.
Student Responsibilities
1. Read the Dissertation Guide carefully, review it periodically, and adhere to the
procedures.
2. Conduct, analyze, and write-up the research with total integrity.
3. Develop and adhere to a work schedule leading to completion within a reasonable period.
4. Provide adequate time for committee members to review your work (two weeks for a
chapter, one month for reviewing the entire dissertation).
5. Ensure that the most important sources relating to the topic have been included and
expertly analyzed.
6. Independently develop expertise in the methodology to be used, such as survey design,
online survey techniques, interview techniques, and qualitative analysis.
7. Independently develop sufficient expertise in analysis tools to select the appropriate
statistics or tools, clean and format the data, conduct the analyses, interpret the results,
and identify the limitations of interpretation. (Demonstrate this capability in your
research proposal.)
8. Identify and objectively analyze alternative interpretations and/or limitations.
9. Submit all documents (including the proposal, dissertation drafts, and the final
dissertation) in a professional and error-free APA format. Submit drafts and final
documents to SafeAssign to check for correct citations.
The student may have a committee member from outside the university, and the use of additional
outside resources and assistance is both permissible and encouraged. Examples of such
assistance may be consultation with a statistician or assistance with proof reading. However, the
committee must be made aware of any such assistance, and the student must assure the
committee that dissertation-related analysis is conducted solely by the student.
The student is responsible for routine communication with the committee as mutually agreed
with the chairperson. Correspondence related to the dissertation should be sent on a routine and
timely basis to the committee chair, who may send it to the other committee members. Each
committee member is responsible for the timely review and comment on the material, and for
communication with the other committee members. In general, feedback on a chapter or
minor issues should be provided within two weeks. However, the student should allow one
month for committee members to review the complete dissertation prior to the formal
dissertation review.
Committee members may resign for any number of reasons including insufficient effort or
progress by the student, lack of courtesy, and unprofessional documents. Likewise, the student
may submit a request for a change of the chair or committee members to the Program Director
should serious problems develop with the composition or effective functioning of the committee.
Once a revised committee is approved, the student must resubmit the research proposal to the
12. 12
new committee. The committee, at its discretion, may require the student to restart the
dissertation process at any point including submission of a new research proposal.
Preparing the Dissertation Proposal
The Concept Brief
The first step in the proposal process is to develop the concept brief in preparation for a meeting
with a faculty member. The concept brief should be sufficiently detailed to allow the faculty
member to judge if the dissertation idea is of an appropriate scope, the required information will
be accessible, the student will have organizational support if needed, and a dissertation
committee with the appropriate skills and background can be assembled. A research problem
should be posed, and one or more research questions should be formulated. A sufficient
literature search should have been done so that a brief background of the problem is presented
and there is confidence that the necessary information to answer the research questions will be
available. A research methodology should have been considered.
Concept Brief
Topic
Introduction
Background
Research Questions
Probability of Success
Dissertation Committee and Assistance
The Concept Paper
The second step in the proposal process is developing the concept paper. This concept paper is
one step closer to the more detailed research proposal. The concept paper is submitted to the
committee members for feedback and approval of the proposed research. The Concept Paper
Evaluation Form (see Blackboard) should be filled out by the committee and forwarded to the
DBA Program administrative assistant.
The concept paper adds another layer to the concept brief. It lays out the crucial elements and
scope of the research, and it should include a discussion of the research problem and the
proposed research approach, and reference the key literature that will support the research. The
research problem should be defined in detail, and the background and justification for the
research outlined. The literature reviewed and presented should be sufficient to establish the
importance of the proposed research, and to identify the theories, models, or professional
assertions that will be extended or empirically examined.
The length of the concept paper will vary with the topic and amount of information processed,
however, it should be of appropriate detail so that the student’s dissertation committee can
confidently determine that the problem is appropriate for the student and can be successfully
13. 13
researched. It begins with the previously approved concept brief and adds to it a review of the
literature, as follows:
1. Concept Brief
2. Review of the literature
Theory, model, or professional assertions to be studied or used
Organizing framework to be used in the literature review, which is usually Chapter 2
Dimensions by which the research question might be narrowed
Key literature references
Inclusions and exclusions of topics related to the problem
Often, as a result of the literature review, the concept brief should be altered to reflect the student’s
deepened understanding.
The Dissertation Proposal
The dissertation proposal is based on the concept paper. It expands on the problem definition
and research questions, adds the detailed methodology, and completes the detailed literature
review. It typically consists of the completed first three chapters of the dissertation if the
student is using a five chapter format. It will be the blueprint for the dissertation, and it is a
working contract between the student and the dissertation committee. Once the proposal has
been approved, it is expected that the dissertation will be completed as specified in the proposal,
unless the student and members of the committee mutually agree to proposed changes. In this
case, the previously completed chapters should be revised to reflect agreed upon changes. A
high-quality proposal is a major part of the dissertation process, and it is important that the
proposal be as complete and detailed as possible.
The proposal must have at least the components outlined below, unless your chair has agreed to a
different format.
Title page
Table of contents (and tables/figures/appendices, if appropriate)
Chapter 1: Introduction
Chapter 2: Review of Literature
Chapter 3: Methodology
References
Appendices
The detailed guidance for the issues to be addressed in the research proposal (usually the first
three chapters) is provided in the Dissertation Outline below. The inclusion or scope of some
items may vary with the methodology chosen. Subsequent chapters are written after data
collection and analysis. The Research Proposal Evaluation form (see Blackboard) should be
completed by the committee and forwarded to the DBA Program administrative assistant.
14. 14
What is appropriate rigor?
Student has independently developed and demonstrated expertise in the selected data
collection and analysis techniques (going beyond the textbooks).
Hypotheses (or propositions for qualitative) are clear, meaningful, and testable. When
possible, hypotheses are built on theory, previous research, or professional assumptions.
Instruments have high reliability.
Strong internal validity, including appropriate sample.
Alternative interpretations and theories are objectively evaluated.
Evidence is provided as to how the case or sample relates to the universe along with some
discussion about how universal results might be different (directionally).
The dissertation proposal, institutional human subjects review forms, a National Institutes of
Health human subject procedures certificate, and any consent forms that will be used in the
conduct of the study are submitted to the committee members for review and approval. All
dissertation research requires submission of a Human Subjects form. Most DBA research can be
exempted (from full Human Subjects Research Committee review) or receive expedited
treatment. However, some Human Subjects forms need to be reviewed by the institutional
Human Subjects Review Committee. This process will typically take 3-5 weeks. The
dissertation chair will be able to provide guidance on whether full committee review is likely to
be required.
The Dissertation
Implementing the Dissertation
Once the research proposal has been accepted by the dissertation committee and approval of the
Human Subjects Review Protocol is granted, a working contract exists between the student and
the committee. Thoroughness and quality of the proposal (often Chapters 1, 2, and 3) will
contribute to effective implementation.
During implementation of the dissertation, the student should meet periodically with his or her
advisors. The number of meetings will vary from student to student, depending upon the nature
of the study. The purpose of these meetings is to discuss unexpected developments, explore
interpretation of unusual results, and jointly develop modifications to methodology or analysis if
needed. Students must continuously register for the 9000 series courses while working on their
dissertations, even if they still have an incomplete grade for DBA 8000. In addition, students are
encouraged to continue attending the DBA 8000 forum even after completing that course. No
registration is required, but the instructor should be informed of your interest in attending and/or
presenting your research in the forum.
It is necessary to maintain a continuing status up to and including graduation. If a student has
completed DBA 9000, 9001, and 9002 (all of the required courses), the student will need to
maintain current registration in DBA 9004 until the dissertation has been completed. DBA 8000
15. 15
and the 9000 series courses encompass a semester rather than a block.
Dissertation Progress Targets
The following milestones are suggested as dissertation progress targets. Students are encouraged
to achieve these milestones more quickly to aim for completion at the end of DBA 9002 while
allowing slack in case difficulties are encountered.
Course Target Progress at End of Course
DBA 8000 Establish dissertation committee and gain approval of concept paper
DBA 9000 Complete research proposal and get it formally approved by dissertation
committee; submit human subjects form
DBA 9001 Collect and analyze data
DBA 9002 Write and defend dissertation
Dissertation Outline
The following outline is generally suggested for most dissertations. However, it is possible to
have a different format. If a different format is desired, reach agreement with your committee on
the details.
Title page
Signature page
Table of contents
List of tables
List of figures
Dedication (optional)
Abstract
Chapter
1. Introduction
Statement of the problem
Significance of the study
Research questions
Hypotheses (replaced by objectives or propositions in some qualitative dissertations)
Limitations, delimitations, and assumptions
Definition of terms
Background
2. Review of the literature
Introduction
Inclusion criteria
Clear organizing themes
16. 16
(Theories, models, or professional assumptions forming the foundation of the study
Clear explanation of how dissertation research will complement previous research
Integration and critique of most important literature references)
3. Methodology
Introduction
Research design
Population and sample (as appropriate)
Data collection and instrumentation
Procedures
Data analysis
Limitations
Ethics related to human subject participation (if applicable)
Summary
4. Results
Introduction
Organization of data analysis
Findings regarding each hypothesis, research question, or objective
Summary
5. Discussion, conclusions, and implications
Introduction
Summary of the study and findings
Conclusions
Implications and applications
Future research
Summary
References
Appendices
Writing the Dissertation
Dissertation Format Requirements
The dissertation is to be written in APA style. Wilmington University has adopted the
Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (sixth edition) as its style
manual, with the exception that the left margin may be 1 ½ inch if the student plans to bind the
dissertation. The dissertation should follow the format specified in the APA Guide Sheet in
Appendix C. The order of preliminary and text pages, pagination requirements, and samples of
the title page and signature page are found in Appendix D.
In all likelihood, no other document that the student will prepare will demand as much scrutiny
as the dissertation. Students may expect their writing to be thoroughly and critically judged. It is
17. 17
the student’s responsibility to see to it that this work is of the highest professional quality. This
includes submitting the document to SafeAssign to check for proper citations and arranging to
have the document checked by an APA editor. The following sections provide guidance for the
chapters of the dissertation.
Chapter 1: Introduction
The introduction starts with a brief discussion of the study, which should gain the readers’
attention. This is followed by a clear and concise statement of the problem, the significance or
purpose of the study, and the need for the study. The research questions should be clearly stated
followed by the hypotheses formulated from those questions or the research objectives or
propositions in the case of qualitative research. Limitations are aspects of the situation or
research design which may adversely impact the generalizability of findings. Delimitations are
the boundaries the researcher has placed on the research. That is to say, what is included and
what is excluded? Assumptions are those things which the study is taking for granted. Any
terms which are central to the study, especially if they are not commonly known or are used in an
uncommon manner, should be defined. In particular, if certain concepts or constructs are
operationalized in the study, the operationalization should be briefly explained. The background
information describes the context of the study and further explains its importance. This
background information may be derived from any credible sources, not necessarily peer-
reviewed.
Chapter 2: Review of the Literature
The literature review is the foundation of a dissertation that provides a framework for explaining
why the study is necessary and relevant. It is an extensive, critical, and insightful review of
relevant, peer-reviewed literature but will not be an exhaustive review. The literature review
starts with an introduction that reminds the reader of the research problem and purpose of the
study, and it outlines the scope of the literature review and how it is organized. The next section
discusses the criteria used to determine which literature was considered relevant to the study and
how the selection of that literature was made.
The body of the literature review is organized by topical headings. It should be organized in a
way that clearly and logically convinces the reader of the necessity and relevance of the study
from a scholarly perspective and establishes a solid foundation for choice of methodology. The
chapter closes with a summary that ties together the main topical headings of the literature
review and a brief preview of what will be presented in Chapter 3.
Other pointers for the literature review
Searching the databases will yield thousands of possible articles. Be smart and efficient with
your screening process. You will be able to eliminate many of the articles produced by the
search by carefully considering the title. It is also worthwhile looking at the number of citations.
If this article has hardly any citations, it’s probably not worth reading unless it is clearly on target
and/or very recent. For titles that look appropriate, check the abstracts. If an abstract looks
18. 18
relevant, read the beginning and end and scan through the middle. If the content still looks
germane, make an entry in your reference database along with some comments. You might
choose to read the article more carefully at this point or to put it on the backburner (until you’ve
got a better handle on its importance).
The bottom line is that you will only read a small fraction of the titles that you find in your
database searches. You will be much more selective than in a typical term paper, and the sources
should be of solid quality (peer-reviewed journals and high quality practitioner and government
sources rather than encyclopedias, newspapers, popular magazines, and websites).
You should be even more selective about what you include in the literature review. Use only the
most relevant and strongest articles. As an ethical researcher, you should include strong articles
that argue against, as well as for, your hypotheses or point-of-view. In general, sources should
be recent except for selective inclusion of a few foundational works that are ubiquitously cited.
More recent articles can be easily located by using the “cited by” feature.
It is particularly helpful to look at several recent dissertations that focus on topics which are
similar to your research interests. Examine how the literature reviews are organized and check
out references that look on target.
Many of the sources which are used in your literature review to provide background and support
your discussion will be cited without providing much if any detail about the articles. Only the
most important articles (relating to the core of your research) will be described, critiqued,
compared, and contrasted in depth. You will probably end up using less than half of the
materials you read.
Chapter 3: Methodology
This chapter discusses the design of the research, and the detailed procedures both proposed and
actually used (if different) to conduct the research. The student may write the chapter in the past
tense so that it doesn’t need to be changed after the research has been conducted. The
procedures should be sufficiently detailed so that reliability and validity can be judged. The
introduction to the chapter includes a brief restatement of the nature and purpose of the study, the
research questions posed, and the hypotheses to be tested or objectives achieved.
The research design is the blueprint for the collection, measurement and analysis of the data. It
describes the specific elements of the investigation used to obtain empirical evidence to answer
the research questions and test the hypotheses or achieve the objectives. (It is your responsibility
to become expert in the sampling, data collection, and analysis procedures used in your research.
This requires reading specialized research books and watching research methods videos as well
as critiquing empirical research articles using similar methods. Your committee members
provide guidance, but ultimately you must become an expert and be prepared to defend your
procedures.)
19. 19
For quantitative statistical research the population and sample section defines the population
investigated in the study and the method used to assure that a representative sample was selected
from that population. The proposed sample size should be defined with a rationale for why that
sample size is appropriate.
A qualitative research methodology may involve action research, a case study, or other
qualitative methods. It is necessary to indicate the methods and rationale used to select the
participants, groups, sites, etc., that were included in the study.
The data collection and instrumentation section must describe how each instrument was used to
gather data from the sample or samples selected. A separate section should be devoted to each
instrument (surveys, interviews, data mining, etc.) adopted or developed for data collection. If
an adopted instrument was used, it must be properly cited and referenced, as should developed
instruments that substantially use the ideas of other researchers. (Remember you should seek
permission to use instruments developed by others. Occasionally, there may be a fee for use or
other restrictions required by the authors.) Any instruments developed for the study must be
included in the appendices along with the results of any pilot studies that may have been done.
The reliability and validity of both adopted and developed instruments must be discussed,
addressing similarities and differences with respect to instruments used in prior studies.
A procedures section should be used to provide the detail necessary to allow for the accurate
reproduction of the study by an independent researcher. It should include all necessary details
for reproduction of the research such as data collection instruments, the settings and techniques
used, and institutional permissions required.
The data analysis section describes how the data was analyzed. The analysis of data depends on
the design of the study and the type of data collected. The analysis may include editing and
coding techniques, statistical treatments for quantitative data, logical treatments for qualitative
data, and software technology used for these treatments. The analysis should include plans for
handling missing data and “don’t know” or neutral responses. If a Code Book was used, it
should be included in an appendix. This section should be organized in the same order as the
research questions in Chapter 1.
Note: Chapters 1-3 are likely to require revision after data gathering and analysis are complete.
However, in quantitative research, hypotheses can’t be revised.
Chapter 4: Results
Chapter 4 presents the results of the data collection and analysis. The results are presented
factually and typically will utilize charts, graphs, tables, individual statistics, or any combination
of these methods. What is presented and its organization is highly dependent on the design of
the study.
The introduction to Chapter 4 will begin with an overview of how the data presentation is
20. 20
organized. The data should be presented in the order of the research questions in Chapter 1, and
these may provide a good outline for the levels and titles of subheadings. If demographic data
was collected and used to determine independent variables, this is usually presented first.
Each section of Chapter 4 should present the appropriate research question, any statistical
analysis, graphic displays, and the results followed by any related hypothesis and whether it was
supported. The chapter should conclude with a summary paragraph of the findings.
Chapter 5: Discussion, Conclusions, and Implications
Chapter 5 is a discussion of the findings, conclusions concerning hypotheses or research
objectives, and overall conclusions. It will also address implications for professional practice
and possible recommendations for implementation, and suggest specific needs for further
research. The introduction to Chapter 5 begins with a review of the sections that will be in the
chapter.
The summary of study and findings provides an overview of the entire study. It includes a very
brief review of the key elements of the literature review and the population from which the
sample was drawn. A review of the findings from the analysis of the data is presented in the
same order as in Chapter 4.
The conclusions are based on the research questions formulated in Chapter 1 and are presented in
that same order. The conclusions should be clearly stated and discussed. The researcher should
analyze, synthesize, and evaluate the research findings and tie everything together. This chapter
is the researcher’s opportunity to tell the reader what the researcher thinks about the research
study and perhaps challenge what was found in the literature. Limitations of the findings should
be stated along with suggested future research.
The implications and applications section provides practical suggestions for addressing issues
raised in the study. They may include recommendations for action and how those
recommendations may be implemented.
Chapter 5 should end with a brief overview of the findings and conclusions.
Completing the Dissertation
Dissertation Submission and Evaluation
The final draft of the dissertation will be submitted to all members of the committee for review
and comment. The student should allow one month for the committee members to read the
document. The study will be evaluated using the criteria outlined in Dissertation Defense
Evaluation form, which can be found in Blackboard. Once the committee is satisfied with the
basic content and form of the dissertation, a defense will be scheduled.
21. 21
The Dissertation Defense
The defense of the dissertation is a formal, public proceeding in which the student presents his or
her dissertation project to the committee and others who are present. The student and the
dissertation chair coordinate the scheduling of the defense, and the student is responsible for
preparing for the defense in collaboration with committee members and DBA faculty members.
The student is responsible for knowing every aspect of the research and is answerable to the
committee for the procedures, accuracy, interpretation, and integrity of the results.
The dissertation defense typically begins with the candidate presenting a brief (e.g., 45 minutes)
overview of the study, including the problem and question(s) addressed in the research, need,
methodology, results, and conclusions. Following this presentation, each member of the
committee will have the opportunity to raise questions. Questions may then be taken from the
general audience. A key purpose of the defense is to help establish a community of scholars.
Questions help everyone become more expert on research methodology and understand the
implications of the research.
When the questioning has concluded, the committee will adjourn to deliberate the status of the
candidate and to discuss any modifications that need to be made to the dissertation. If the
committee determines that the candidate has passed, necessary changes that have been identified
by the committee are discussed with the candidate. The candidate will be asked to make those
changes before committee members and the Dean officially sign the signature sheets that are
published with the dissertation. Signatures must be obtained at least two weeks prior to
Commencement in order to have a degree conferred.
Publishing the Dissertation
After required changes are made and approved and the APA format check is completed, an
electronic version of the dissertation is to be submitted to ProQuest UMI Dissertation Publishing
for publication in Dissertation Abstracts International (DAI). Submission must take place at
least two weeks prior to Commencement. The doctoral degree is awarded after the DAI
submission and final approval for graduation is granted. The student must have previously
applied for graduation and have an approved, official Wilmington University graduation check.
Maintaining Continuing Status
Continuing Status
Students who have entered doctoral candidacy must maintain continuing status by registering for
at least one DBA 9000 series course per semester unless they have been granted a leave of
absence by the Director. (We recommend just taking one 9000 series course at a time.)
Students who have completed all coursework except for having an incomplete in DBA 8000
22. 22
must maintain continuing registration in 9000 series courses.
If a student fails to register for a 9000 series course, and the student has not obtained a leave of
absence, the student will be viewed as having voluntarily withdrawn from the program. Students
are responsible for knowing and meeting the registration deadlines. In the case of voluntary
withdrawal, the dissertation committee will be dissolved. The student may reapply to the
program. In considering the reapplication, the faculty committee will evaluate whether the
student is sufficiently committed to the program to complete the requirements within the seven
year limit. The limit is measured from the date the student took the first course in the program,
not the reapplication date.
Leave of Absence
A student who has entered doctoral candidacy (completed all coursework and the comprehensive
examination) may apply for one leave of absence by providing an explanation of the need and
the desired length of absence. Only one leave of absence is allowed, and there must be a
compelling reason for granting the absence.
The DBA program director will evaluate whether the reason provided is acceptable. A serious
illness of the student or a close relative would be a suitable reason. A general desire for a break
or being busy at work would usually not be acceptable reasons. The student must apply for the
leave of absence at least three weeks before semester registration deadline. The student’s
committee will be informed about the leave and its duration, and the committee will not provide
any support to the student during the leave. If the leave granted is longer than one semester, the
committee may choose to disband. Also, the student may be required to update dissertation
documents before continuing with research.
If the student does not register for a 9000 series class after the agreed upon leave of absence
period, the student will be classified as having voluntarily withdrawn from the program.
23. 23
Appendix A
Guidelines for the Concept Brief
The concept brief should be sufficiently detailed to allow the faculty member to judge if the
dissertation idea is of an appropriate scope, the required information will be accessible, the
student will have organizational support if needed, the student has or can realistically develop the
required data collection and analysis skills, and a dissertation committee with the appropriate
skills and background can be assembled. The brief should be limited to about five pages, but the
student should be prepared to discuss the topic in more detail.
The following is a suggested outline for the concept brief.
Topic: Title or description of proposed dissertation topic
Introduction: Why is this proposed topic an appropriate dissertation topic?
What does it contribute to the professional field of study? Does it address a management
concern or dilemma?
What does it contribute to the academic field of study? Does it address a gap in the
academic literature or expand an academic theory?
What does it contribute to the student’s professional goals?
Background: Briefly, what is known about this proposed topic?
What does the professional and/or academic literature have to say about this topic?
How does this literature or a gap in this literature support the proposed topic?
What experience or knowledge does the student or the student’s organization contribute
to this topic?
What key literature references support the viability of this topic?
Research questions: What are the key research questions that need to be answered?
Probability of success: Are the factors in place to suggest that the proposed research program
has a good chance of success?
What kind of information is necessary to develop or access to answer the research
questions?
How will that information be developed or where will that information be found?
Briefly describe the general research methodology that will be deployed and the kind of
information analysis that will be used. Have other researchers in this area used a similar
methodology?
How much cooperation from other individuals or organizations will be required? How
confident are you that that the required cooperation can be achieved? What potential
24. 24
obstacles may hinder that cooperation or success?
Can the results be published (perhaps with disguised identities) without jeopardizing
proprietary information or the welfare of participants?
Dissertation committee and assistance: What kind of guidance and assistance is important to
the success of this proposed research topic?
What skills or knowledge do you think that dissertation committee members will need to
have to provide the proper support for the research topic?
What other assistance do you think you will need to be successful?
25. 25
Appendix B
Human Subjects Review Overview
The Review Process
The fundamental responsibility of the HSRC is to assure that all ethical issues have been fully
addressed in the protection of human subjects who volunteer to participate in research studies.
The Principal Investigator will most often be a student, but may be a faculty or staff member.
The HSRC considers the following:
1. The risks to the participants,
2. The anticipated benefits to the participants and to others,
3. The importance of the knowledge that may reasonably be expected to result; and
4. The informed consent process to be employed.
The HSRC reviews the information submitted by the Principal Investigator to determine
whether, if necessary, subjects are informed about the nature of the study, the details of their
participation, and the voluntary nature of their participation. In addition, the HSRC weighs
whether the risks and benefits of the research are evenly distributed among the possible subject
populations. The HSRC is particularly concerned about protecting vulnerable parties, such as
children, the mentally disabled, and prisoners. It is also concerned about protecting the rights of
people who might feel coerced. For example, if a manager were to conduct a survey of direct
reports, procedures need to be carefully designed to minimize a sense of coercion and well as
bias.
Another concern is privacy of personal information. The researcher should store personally
identifiable data in a secure fashion, preferably coding identifying information and storing the
codes separately. Personably identifiable data should be stored securely for three years and then
destroyed. (Data that is not personally identifiable may be kept longer than three years.)
Formal informed consent is not always necessary. When it is, the basic elements of informed
consent are as follows:
1. A statement that the study involves research, an explanation of the purposes of the
research and the expected duration of the subject’s participation, a description of the
procedures to be followed, and identification of any procedures which are
experimental;
2. A description of any reasonably foreseeable risks or discomforts to the subject;
3. A description of any benefits to the subject or to others which may reasonably be
expected from the research;
4. A disclosure of appropriate alternative procedures or courses of treatment, if any, that
might be advantageous to the subject;
26. 26
5. A statement describing the extent, if any, to which confidentiality of records
identifying the subject will be maintained;
6. For research involving more than minimal risk, an explanation as to whether any
compensation and an explanation as to whether any medical treatments are available
if injury occurs and, if so, what they consist of, or where further information may be
obtained;
7. An explanation of whom to contact for answers to pertinent questions about the
research and research subjects’ rights, and whom to contact in the event of a research-
related injury to the subject; and
8. A statement that participation is voluntary, refusal to participate will involve no
penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject is otherwise entitled, and the subject
may discontinue participation at any time without penalty or loss of benefits to which
the subject is otherwise entitled.
Procedures
The following procedures will be employed in the review process:
1. The student and his or her research committee adviser will determine the anticipated
risk or potential for intellectual, physical, psychological, or social injury that is
associated with a student’s research project. They will be responsible for insuring
ethical treatment of subjects, as required by the guidelines emanating from a division,
HSRC, and participating institutions.
2. The student will complete a HSRC form (including a National Institute of Health
training certificate) and submit it to the research committee adviser. If the advisor
judges the form to be complete and the procedures to be appropriate, the advisor will
forward the form to a division representative on the HSRC.
3. The College representative on the HSRC will assess the information received from the
student’s adviser, and will:
a) Sign off on the submitted study concept indicating that the research project is
exempt from further review and the study may proceed, or
b) Request a meeting with the adviser and/or student to discuss the situation, or
c) Submit the form to another HSRC representative for an expedited review, or
d) Submit the form for full committee review.
The criteria for these scenarios are found in the detailed information about the HSRC
process on the DBA Blackboard website.
4. When a HSRC form is submitted from division HSRC members to the HSRC
committee, the committee or its designee(s) will deliberate and make a decision. The
decision will be transmitted to the student and the research adviser and copied to the
27. 27
College HSRC representative.
5. Under no circumstances will a student whose research project has not been reviewed
by the College HSRC representative, or is under review by the HSRC, be allowed to
collect data until a decision has been rendered
6. Appeals of HSRC decisions may be made by the student or his or her advisor directly
to the HSRC, and thereafter, if necessary, to the Vice President of Academic Affairs.
Note: The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has developed training modules resulting in a Certificate of
Completion designed to prepare investigators conducting research involving human subjects to understand their
obligations to protect the rights and welfare of subjects in research.
Protecting the dignity and welfare of human subjects needs to be an integral part of planning research, collecting
data, analysis, and reporting. When possible, anonymous collection of data is encouraged, along with careful
consideration of the amount of demographic information needed.
28. 28
Appendix C
APA Guide Sheet
Left Margin:
Right Margin:
Top/Bottom Margins:
Header/Footer:
1.5 (if binding) or 1.0 inch
1.00 inch
1.00 inch
1.00 inch
Font: Times New Roman, 12 point font
Title Page = i
Signature Page = ii, etc.
Small Roman numerals, upper right corner, but
number does not appear until the second page of
the Table of Contents and thereafter.
Running Head: No Running Head
Table of Contents: Contains dedication page (optional),
acknowledgement page (optional), list of tables, list
of figures, abstract, chapter titles and all headings
that appear in the text, and appendices. All double
spaced.
Headings: Chapter headings centered, bold, all caps, double
spaced, e.g.,
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
All other headings follow APA format
Tables: Double-spaced
Exception: May be single-spaced to fit on one
page rather than split table onto two pages.
Block Quotes: Any quotes longer than 40 words
must appear in block form.
Final punctuation appears before page reference at
end of block quote. No quotation marks.
Page numbers: 12 point –UPPER RIGHT TOP CORNER OF
PAGE
Definition of terms: Should be presented in alpha order
Body text: Left Justified, ragged right, double spaced
Block Quote Spacing: Double spaced
1 Appendix =
2 or more =
Appendix
Appendices
The title “Appendix A” can either be: On the top of the first page of the appendix or have
its own title page with the actual appendix material
behind it
Each page of the appendix should receive a
number, even if that number does not appear on the
page. This is especially true when the appendix is a
document that has not been created on your
computer, therefore, a typed number cannot appear
on the page.
If the document was created on the computer,
include it in its proper place with a page number. If
you choose to use an appendix title page with each
appendix, it is to have a title and a number.
29. 29
Appendix D
Page Order, Pagination, and Sample Pages
Dissertation Page Order and Pagination Requirements
a) Title Page – counted but not numbered
b) Signature Page – counted but not numbered
c) Copyright Pages (optional) – counted but not numbered
d) Table of Contents – first page counted but not numbered, additional pages are numbered
in lower case Roman numerals
e) List of Tables (if applicable) – numbered
f) List of Figures (if applicable) – numbered
g) Dedication (optional) – numbered
h) Acknowledgments (optional) – numbered
i) Abstract – numbered
j) Chapters (begin Arabic numerals at 1)
k) References – numbered
l) Appendices (if applicable)
Margins: must follow margin guidelines; left margin is either 1.5 (if binding) or 1.0”; 1.0”
margin on top, right and bottom
30. 30
Appendix E
Informed Consent Guidelines
One of the guiding principles for research involving human subjects is respect for persons,
taking into consideration their roles as autonomous agents. Thus, some level of informed
consent is required in many research initiatives in which data is gathered from or about people.
In some cases, informed consent needs to be rigorous and in written form. In other situations,
lower levels of detail in the information provided and less formality in the consent are
acceptable. Here are some guidelines on the level of consent needed in various types of
research. If in doubt, err on the side of providing more information in a more formal manner.
1) Little or no consent needed – The presence of the following design parameters reduces the
need for obtaining consent:
Minimal risk (physical, psychological, social, or economic) to subjects
Observations or responses are not identified with individuals
Unobtrusive observation of people engaged in routine activities
Surveys that take little time
Information is public
2) Informal consent needed – For informal consent, the investigator provides some information
about purpose and procedures; subject grants verbal permission or subject’s voluntary
participation serves as evidence of consent
Minimal risk (physical, psychological, social, or economic) to subjects
Reports will not associate data with individuals
Surveys that take moderate time or effort
Observation of people in a way that is apparent, but does not greatly interfere with
subjects’ ability to perform their jobs or enjoy their lives
Formal consent has been provided by a supervisor
3) Formal, written informed consent needed – Any of the following conditions:
Some risk (physical, psychological, social, or economic) to subjects
Reports will associate data with individuals
Subjects include people who are classified by 45 CFR 46 as belonging to a vulnerable
group and the research itself is not classified as exempt, such as studies of public policy
31. 31
Appendix F
Dissertation Milestones
Milestone Target Date Completion
Determine interests & select tentative topic
Articulate tentative research question(s)
Conduct preliminary literature review
Conceptualize tentative research methodology
Write concept brief
Review concept brief with at least 1 faculty member
Refine research question(s)
Define clear, appropriate, testable hypotheses or solid objectives
Define clear contribution to practice
Recruit dissertation chair
Gain approval of other members from dissertation chair
Recruit other committee members
Submit outside committee member credentials to DBA director
Submit signed committee form, concept brief & outside member
credentials/payment form to DBA admin asst
Identify key scholarly/practitioner research areas for lit review
Define clear boundaries for each lit review area
Read sufficient & important sources for each lit review area
Conduct insightful critique & analysis for each lit review area
Determine proposed research fit with empirical literature (gap, extension?)
& importance
Explore literature on data collection and analysis methods that will be used
Define major elements of methodology
Develop plan for validity & reliability
Develop plan for human subjects & ethical issues
Write concept paper (DBA 8000)
Discuss concept paper with committee members
Refine research question(s), hypotheses, & objectives
Refine organizing principles of the literature review
Evaluate, analyze, & integrate highly relevant literature
Refine methodology; address validity & reliability
Refine research question, hypotheses & methodology by discussing with
practitioners
Develop expertise in selected methodology
Discuss methodology with scholarly experts
Write & submit Chapter 1
Write & submit Chapter 2
Write & submit Chapter 3; alternative formats are possible
Revise chapters; allow for several revisions
Gain approval for research proposal (typically Chapters 1-3)
Submit human subjects form
Gain approval for proposal and human subjects form; could require up to 2
months if full committee review is required; allow 2 weeks for exempt or
expedited approval
(DBA 9000)
32. 32
Milestone Target Date Completion
Gain approvals/make arrangements to collect data
Pilot instrument/data collection and revise instrument and procedures
Start data collection
Complete data collection (DBA 9001)
Analyze data
Discuss rough results with committee members; agree on how to handle
unexpected results or problem areas
Write Chapter 4
Revise Chapter 4 & get approval
Submit petition for graduation
Write Chapter 5; other formats are possible
Revise Chapter 5 & get approval
Set up defense date; your chair will make room arrangements & publicize
Fine tune entire document; ensure consistency throughout
Submit entire document to committee members, allowing 4 weeks for
review
Prepare PowerPoint presentation (typically, 30 minutes); submit to
committee
Make revisions to slides if recommended by committee
Conduct dissertation defense; answer questions (DBA 9002)
Address any remaining issues & get committee signatures
Provide signed copy to DBA admin asst for Dean’s signature
After Dean’s signature, electronically submit PDF to ProQuest
Graduate & celebrate! (Get a life!)