The document discusses the relationship between historians, facts, and historical interpretation. It argues that historians do not objectively record the past but rather selectively evaluate facts based on insights from the present. The facts that historians examine are like fish in the ocean that depend on where the historian chooses to fish and what tackle they use. As a result, historians will find the kinds of facts they want, and interpretation is essential to the writing of history.

1. WHY DO WE QUESTION ? I NEVER JUDGE THE ABILITY OF MY STUDENTS WITH THE ACCURACY OF THE ANSWERS THEY PRODUCE FOR MY QUESTIONS BUT WITH THE QUESTIONS THEY PUT FORWARD…… DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN

2. ? WHAT IS HISTORY The George Macaulay Trevelyan lectures delivered in the University of Cambridge January – March 1961 By EDWARD HALLETT CARR Fellow of Trinity College GROUP ‘D’

17. CAUSATION IN HISTORY History begins with the handling down of tradition; and tradition means the carrying of the habits and lessons of the past into the future. Records of the past begin to be kept for the benefit of future generations.

22. The Group “D” Team PUNYASIL RAJNA MEHRA RAVI RANJAN RIKA GUITE RITU RAJ RUPESH SHERSHTA SACHIN DHAR SAKSHI LAMBA SANGEETHA SARITHA SATYA PRIYA SHAHBAZ SHAIJU CHACKO