CAMBRIDGE AS HISTORY: DISPUTE OVER THE CHINESE EMPIREGeorge Dumitrache
CAMBRIDGE AS HISTORY: DISPUTE OVER THE CHINESE EMPIRE. It contains: the first opium war, the second opium war, extraterritoriality, Dalai Lama in exile, China in late Qing, questioning China, Russia and China.
CAMBRIDGE AS HISTORY: DISPUTE OVER THE CHINESE EMPIREGeorge Dumitrache
CAMBRIDGE AS HISTORY: DISPUTE OVER THE CHINESE EMPIRE. It contains: the first opium war, the second opium war, extraterritoriality, Dalai Lama in exile, China in late Qing, questioning China, Russia and China.
Unit 3, Lecture 1 - The 1920s. Covers the Harding and Coolidge presidencies, as well as the social and economic changes of the decade. Ends before the Crash.
This covers all of how America got into World War One through how we helped end the war in Europe. It also at the end discusses the treaty of Versailles.
Unit 3, Lecture 1 - The 1920s. Covers the Harding and Coolidge presidencies, as well as the social and economic changes of the decade. Ends before the Crash.
This covers all of how America got into World War One through how we helped end the war in Europe. It also at the end discusses the treaty of Versailles.
Yonis, Thank you for your paper. STRENGTH(S)- Some good point.docxodiliagilby
Yonis, Thank you for your paper.
STRENGTH(S):
- Some good points on an important topic in American history.
- Your enthusiasm for the topic was readily evident.
AREA(S) TO IMPROVE:
- It was a little short.
- Work on improving your introduction and thesis statement. Here is a resource to consider: http://www.bowdoin.edu/writing-guides/thesis.htm
- Focus more on analysis of the topic vice describing it. Ask yourself a good research question and answer it. Here is a resource to consider on writing a good history paper: http://www.hamilton.edu/documents/Writing_Good_History_Paper%203rd%20ed.pdf
- Focus your topic on the assignment.
WEEK 5 PAPER FORUM: Answer the question below in the Written assignment #1 paper forum by the end of week 5.
- Although frontier history is generally treated as an Anglo-American story, in the Far West it is much more about ethnic diversity. Why?
Grade: Format/Submission: 9/10; Intro/Thesis: 15/20; Organization/Body: 20/25; Historical Analysis: 20/25; Writing/Grammar: 9/10; Citations/Bibliography: 9/10 Final Grade: 82
I look forward to your next paper. Carl
Espinosa
Espinosa
Student’s Name: Yonis Espinosa
Professor: Carl J Bradshaw
Course:Hist 102
Date: September 14, 2016
Westward Expansion in America
Westside expansion has always been the talk of the United States of America. The expansion began along the Eastern Coast and continued until to the Pacific despite it going through bounds and leaps. This was described by Theodore as a great leap towards the west (Quay and Sara 257). Even before the colonized states in America had not won independence in the Revolutionary war against Britain, settlers had already begun migrating towards the west into the states that are today known by the name Tennessee and Kentucky; they also moved to the Deep Southern part and parts of the valley known as Ohio. The expansion of the Westside was greatly influenced by the Louisiana Purchase which took place in the year 1803. The 1812 war caused the securing of the boundaries of the United States and defeated Old Northwest tribes. The removal act of Indians which took place in 1830 caused the forcefully moving of all Indians to the what are now known as the states of Oklahoma and Arkansas on a journey which was named the Trail of Tears (Quay and Sara 257). The term “Manifest Destiny” a belief that American institutions and Americans are superior and therefore, Americans had the obligations of spreading these institutions with the aim of helping people get freed from the European Colonization, was in 1945 coined by a journalist known by the name John O’Sullivan.
Expansion towards the west side was greatly assisted by the finishing of the Transcontinental Railroad in the year 1869b and the Homestead Act passage which took place in 1862 (Quay and Sara 257). This act was responsible for giving a 160-acre land to someone who would file a claim, build a home on the land for five years and in turn make improvements on the land. The Gre ...
Safalta Digital marketing institute in Noida, provide complete applications that encompass a huge range of virtual advertising and marketing additives, which includes search engine optimization, virtual communication advertising, pay-per-click on marketing, content material advertising, internet analytics, and greater. These university courses are designed for students who possess a comprehensive understanding of virtual marketing strategies and attributes.Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida is a first choice for young individuals or students who are looking to start their careers in the field of digital advertising. The institute gives specialized courses designed and certification.
for beginners, providing thorough training in areas such as SEO, digital communication marketing, and PPC training in Noida. After finishing the program, students receive the certifications recognised by top different universitie, setting a strong foundation for a successful career in digital marketing.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
A Survey of Techniques for Maximizing LLM Performance.pptx
Westward Expansion
1. Solving History’s Economic Mysteries 4:
Westward Expansion
Deborah Kozdras, Ph.D.
University of South Florida
Stavros.coedu.usf.edu
dkozdras@usf.edu
http://tinyurl.com/historymystery3
4
2. Decisionomics: Consequences of
Decisions in Westward Expansion
• http://www.c3teachers.org/wp-
content/uploads/2015/09/NewYork_7_Westw
ard_Migration.pdf
SS.8.A.4.1 - Examine the causes, course, and consequences of United States westward
expansion and its growing diplomatic assertiveness (War of 1812, Convention of 1818,
Adams-‐Onis Treaty, Missouri Compromise, Monroe Doctrine, Trail of Tears, Texas
annexation, Manifest Destiny, Oregon Territory, Mexican American War/Mexican Cession,
California Gold Rush, Compromise of 1850, Kansas Nebraska Act, Gadsden Purchase).
3. Westward Expansion
Through Postage Stamps
Westward expansion through postage stamps.
http://www.smithsoniansource.org/display/lessonplan/viewdetails.
aspx?TopicId=1000&LessonPlanId=1017
4. Northwest Ordinance EDBQ:
What were the decisions? What are costs/benefits?
Art. 1. No person shall be persecuted for their beliefs,
including religion and choice of worship, in the area that
they are choosing to live.
Art. 2. Anyone living in one of the territories will still be
allowed to their rights of trial by jury, search and seizure
and all other measures that are allowed under the bill of
rights to defending themselves.
Art. 3. … schools and the means of education shall
forever be encouraged. The utmost good faith shall
always be observed towards the Indians; their lands and
property shall never be taken from them without their
consent; and, in their property, rights, and liberty, they
shall never be invaded or disturbed, unless in just and
lawful wars authorized by Congress…
Art. 4. This territory, and the States which may be
formed, shall forever remain a part of the United States
of America… The navigable waters leading into the
Mississippi and St. Lawrence, and the carrying places
between the same; shall be common highways and
forever free, as well to the inhabitants of the territory as
to the citizens of the United States.
Art. 6. There shall be no slavery in the territory,
otherwise than in the punishment of crimes whereof the
party shall have been convicted.
Timeline: http://www.in.gov/history/images/nwmap.gif
6. Louisiana Purchase 1803: Decisions and Economic Consequences
• Was it a benefit or a
cost to the economy?
https://www.monticello.org/site/jefferson/louisiana-purchase
http://thelouisianapurchasedbq.weebly.com/document-f.html
7. Lewis and Clark
1804:
QR and Nickel Activity
Westward journey nickel
series
https://www.usmint.gov/kids/
teachers/lessonPlans/pdf/wjn
sResourceGuide.pdf
Describe each nickel and tell
why the images were
important to the expedition.
For more primary sources:
http://huntington.org/upload
edFiles/Files/PDFs/LHTHLewis
Clark.pdf
https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/
lewisandclark/
8. Embargo Act 1807: Economic Consequences
Problem: In 1805 France controlled much of Europe. Britain mastered the seas.
Decision: Napoleon stopped British goods from being imported into Europe.
What are the costs/benefits? What are future consequences of the decision?
9. Events Leading to Embargo Act
• 1805, France controlled
land in Europe.
• England controlled the
sea.
Napoleon decided to close
ports to stop British goods
from export to Europe.
• 1806, Britain passed Orders
in Council: U.S. ships must
stop at British port before
landing in other European
port
Napoleon demanded seizure
of any ship that landed in
Britain before Europe • This hurt U.S. economy so
1807 Jefferson passed
Embargo Act that
stopped imports and
exports from U.S. ports
. Embargo shut down New
England trade and left
South and West with unsold
goods
10. Want were the impacts of the Embargo Act on trade?
More War of 1812 documents http://neh.niagara.edu/assets/docs/DBQ-Documents.pdf
11. Economic Consequences of Embargo Act
What do you see?
(consider
ograbme as an
anagram or
reversgram)
Another anagram
was Mob rage.
What do you
think? Who does
the man with the
barrel represent?
What is he trying
to do? What
country does the
ship belong to?
What is the ship
waiting for?
What do you
wonder?
Is this cartoon for
or against the act?
Decision: Embargo Act passed in 1807
Consequences: Embargo shut down New England trade and left South
and West with unsold goods so by 1808 illegal trade across U.S./Canada
(not yet a country) border was rampant.
12. War of 1812
Resources for Kids: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/warof1812/for-kids.htm
More primary source docs: http://neh.niagara.edu/assets/docs/DBQ-Documents.pdf
http://www.ehsfaculty.org/history/tsmith/Site/student_created_DBQS_files/Sorensen%20DBQ%
0Project%20War%20of%201812.pdf
13. Monroe Doctrine
President Monroe Enforces The Monroe Doctrine – 1823
President James Monroe boldly proclaimed The Western Hemisphere closed to European
colonization. If Europe observed this, The U.S. would not intervene in Europe’s affairs.
“ . . . the American continents, by the free and independent condition which they have
assumed and maintain . . . Henceforth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization
by any European powers . . .” President Monroe’s message to Congress, December 2, 1823
https://multimedialearning.org/FreeDownloads/2010/MonroeDoctrineCartoons.pdf
15. Florida: East and West
• FCIT Passage at grade
level:http://fcit.usf.edu/florida/docs/f/florterr.htm
• FCIT Floripedia Secondary Source from
1905:http://fcit.usf.edu/florida/lessons/cur.htm#trans
fer
• St. Augustine under three flags timeline
http://fcit.usf.edu/florida/docs/s/satimeln.htm )
16. Jefferson’s Covert Negotiations for Purchase of West
Florida from Spain in 1804
James Akin's earliest-known
signed cartoon, "The Prairie Dog"
is an anti-Jefferson satire,
relating to Jefferson's covert
negotiations for the purchase of
West Florida from Spain in 1804.
Jefferson, as a scrawny dog, is
stung by a hornet with
Napoleon's head into coughing
up "Two Millions" in gold coins,
(the secret appropriation
Jefferson sought from Congress
for the purchase). On the right
dances a man (possibly a French
diplomat) with orders from
French minister Talleyrand in his
pocket and maps of East Florida
and West Florida in his hand. He
says, "A gull for the People.”
James Akin's earliest-known
signed cartoon, "The Prairie Dog"
is an anti-Jefferson satire,
relating to Jefferson's covert
negotiations for the purchase of
West Florida from Spain in 1804.
Jefferson, as a scrawny dog, is
stung by a hornet with
Napoleon's head into coughing
up "Two Millions" in gold coins,
(the secret appropriation
Jefferson sought from Congress
for the purchase). On the right
dances a man (possibly a French
diplomat) with orders from
French minister Talleyrand in his
pocket and maps of East Florida
and West Florida in his hand. He
says, "A gull for the People."
1804 Title: The prairie dog sickened at the sting of the hornet
or a diplomatic puppet exhibiting his deceptions / J[ames]
Akin, fect
http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2002708977/
17. Castillo de San Marcos FCIT
http://etc.usf.edu/nps/ibooks/ Castillo de San Marcos
Read ibooks on pc http://www.startribune.com/how-to-read-itunes-books-on-your-pc/160428925/
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/readium/fepbnnnkkadjhjahcafoaglimekefifl?hl=en-US
Pg. 7 Interactive timeline, Pg. 99 Manifest Destiny
20. Mexican American War: 1846-48
Mexican War EBQ Create an argument about whether
you agree or disagree that President Polk’s decision to
go to war with Mexico was in the best interest of the
United States of America.
Using Documents A-F, consider:
• What was the problem (why did they fight the war)?
• What choices did they have?
• What were the costs of the war?
• What were the benefits of the war?
• What were the future consequences?
21. Mexican American War: Document A
President Polk (1846)
Expansionist President of the US during the war.
The grievous wrong perpetrated by Mexico upon our citizens
throughout a long period of years remain undressed, and solemn
[claims] treaties pledging her public faith for his redress have been
disregarded. A government either unable or unwilling to inforce the
execution of such treaties fails to perform one of its plainest duties.
Instead of this, however, we have been exerting our best efforts to
propitiate her good will. Upon the pretext that Texas, a nation as
independent as herself, thought proper to unite its destinies with our
own, she has affected to believe that we have severed her rightful
territory, and in official proclamations and manifestos has repeatedly
threatened to make war upon us for the purpose of reconquering
Texas. In the meantime, we have tried every effort at reconciliation.
The cup of forbearance had been exhausted even before the
recent information from the frontier of the [Rio Grande] Del Norte. But
now, after reintegrated menaces. Mexico has passed the boundary of
the US, has invaded our territory, and shed American blood upon
American soil. She has proclaimed the hostilities have commenced,
and that the two nations are now at war.
22. Mexican American War: Document B
New York newspaperman John O’Sullivan
O’Sullivan is the expansionist reporter who coined the
phrase “manifest destiny.”
Away, away with all these cobweb tissues of rights of
discovery, exploration, settlement, contiguity, etc . . . The
American claim is by the right of our manifest destiny to
overspread and to possess the whole of the continent
which Providence has given us for the development of
the great experiment of liberty and federative self-
government entrusted to us. It is a right such as that of
the tree to the space of air and earth suitable for the full
expansion of its principle and destiny of growth… it is in
our future far more then in our past or in the past history
of Spanish exploration or French colonial rights, that our
True Title is to be found.
23. Mexican American War: Document C
Miguel Barragan, Dispatch on Texas Colonists (October 31, 1835) Barragan is a
Mexican writing about the American-Texan attitude towards Mexico/Mexicans in
1835.
For a long time the ungrateful Texas colonists have made fun of the national laws of
Mexico; disregarding the fact that Mexico gave them a generous welcome and kept
them close to our bosom; dispensing to them the same-and even more-benefits
than to our sons.
Everytime we have had internal agitation they have thought the Republic weak and
impotent to control their excesses. These have multiplied intensely, producing
insults again and again against the whole of our National Arms.
To the Texas colonists, the word MEXICAN is, and has been, an execrable (being
inferior/less than) word. There has been no insult or violation that our countrymen
have not suffered, including being jailed as “foreigners” in their own country.
All this has reached the point where the flag of rebellion has been raised; the
Texans aspiring shamelessly to take over one of the most precious parts of our land.
Accomplices to this wickedness are adventurers from the state of Louisiana who
foment disturbances and give necessary support to the rebels. The civilized world
will not delay in pronouncing the judgment they deserve for this infamous and
detestable conduct. The Supreme Government knows its duties and knows how to
execute them.
The Government believes that not one Mexican worthy of his country will favor the
treason of foreign rebels, but that if such a misfortunate exists, the power and duty
of punishing him lies in your hands.
God and Liberty!
24. Mexican American War: Document D
Charles DeMorse Gives a Texan’s View of the War with Mexico
(1846) DeMorse is an American-Texan calling on former
Americans to fight the Mexican army.
At last we have a real “sure enough” war on hand: something to
warm the blood and draw out the national enthusiasm. It seems
that the “Magnanimous Mexican Nation” has at last come out of
its chaparral of wordy diplomacy, treachery, meanness and
bombast, and concluded for a little while, quickly with the
though- an opportunity to pay off a little of the debt of
vengeance which has been accumulating since the Massacre of
the Alamo.
We trust that every man of our army, as he points his rifle and
thrusts his, bayonet, will think of his countrymen martyred at
the Alamo, Goliad, and at Mier, whose blood yet cries aloud
from the ground for remembrance and vengeance, and taking a
little closer aim or giving a little stronger thrust, will give his
blow in his country’s cause and an additional “God Speed.”
25. Mexican American War: Document E
Resolution drafted by Charles Sumner (1847) Sumner is an American politician arguing
against the Mexican-American War
Resolved, That the present war with Mexico has its primary origin in the unconstitutional
annexation to the United States of the foreign state of Texas while the same was still at war
with Mexico; that it was unconstitutionally commenced by the order of the President, to
General Taylor, to take military possession of territory in dispute between the United States
and Mexico, and in ' the occupation of Mexico; and that it is now waged ingloriously by a
powerful nation against a weak neighbor unnecessarily and without just cause, at immense
cost of treasure and life, for the dismemberment of Mexico, and for the conquest of a
portion of her territory, from which slavery has already been excluded, with the triple object
of extending slavery, of strengthening the "Slave Power," and of obtaining the control of the
Free States, under the Constitution of the United States.
Resolved, That such a war of conquest, so hateful in its objects, so wanton, unjust, and
unconstitutional in its origin and character, must be regarded as a war against freedom,
against humanity, against justice, against the Union, against the Constitution, and against the
Free States; and that a regard for the true interests and the highest honor of the country, not
less than the impulses of Christian duty, should arouse all good citizens to join in efforts to
arrest this gigantic crime, by withholding supplies', or other voluntary contributions, for its
further prosecution; by calling for the withdrawal of our army within the established limits of
the United States; and in every just way aiding the country to retreat from the disgraceful
position of aggression which it now occupies towards a weak, distracted neighbor and sister
republic.
Resolved, That our attention is directed anew to the wrong and "enormity" of slavery, and to
the tyranny and usurpation of the "Slave Power," as displayed in the history of our country,
particularly in the annexation of Texas and the present war with Mexico . . .
26. Mexican American War: Document F
Mexican general Mariana Arista’s advice to the soldiers of the U.S. Army (1846)
Arista is calling on American soldiers to desert the American army and join the
Mexican cause.
It is to no purpose if they tell you, that the law for the annexation of Texas
justifies your occupation of the Rio Bravo del Norte; for by this act they rob us of a
great part of the Tamaulipas, Coahuila, and New Mexico; and it is barbarous to send
us a handful of men on such an errand against a powerful and warlike nation.
Besides, the most of you are Europeans, and we are the declared friends of a
majority of the nations of Europe. The North Americans are ambitious, overbearing,
and insolent as a nation, and they will only make use of you as vile tools to carry
out their abominable plans of pillage and rapine.
If, in time of action, you wish to espouse our cause, throw away your arms and
run to us, and will embrace you as true friends and Christians. It is not decent nor
prudent to say more. But should any of you render important service to Mexico,
you shall be accordingly considered and preferred.
27. Trail of Tears
1828 . . .
http://florida.pbslearningmedia.org
/resource/akh10.socst.ush.exp.trail/
trail-of-tears/
National Park Service Video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v
=7LSkfmCj8Jg and exhibits
https://www.nps.gov/trte/learn/hist
oryculture/exhibits.htm
https://www.loc.gov/teachers/classr
oommaterials/presentationsandacti
vities/presentations/immigration/na
tive_american2.html
http://www.polk-
fl.net/staff/teachers/tah/documents
/turningpoints/documentquestions/
b-TrailofTears-Woolwine.pdf
28. California Gold Rush 1848
Letters
• What new information
did you learn by reading
these documents?
• How were the people in
the letters different
from what you'd
imagined?
• How much do the
letters talk about gold?
What else is discussed?
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/goldrush/peopleevents/e_goldrush.html
http://www.readwritethink.org/classroom-resources/calendar-activities/gold-discovered-california-1848-20403.html
ReadWriteThink Letter Generator
to create your own letter.
29. Missouri Compromise: 1820
Choices: Free vs. Slave
What were costs/benefits of choices?
What was the decision? What were future consequences?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTSbn5cE4LA
30. Compromise of 1850: Overturned Missouri
Compromise
http://www.ushistory.org/us/30d.asp
32. Kansas Nebraska Act 1854: Interactive
Choices: Free vs. Slave What were costs/benefits of choices?
What was the decision? What were future consequences?
TED ED Video http://ed.ted.com/lessons/the-legislation-that-birthed-the-republican-party-ben-labaree-jr
33. Building an Argument
Here are my reasons!
1. _________________
_________________
_________________
2. _________________
_________________
_________________
3. _________________
_________________
_________________
You could argue that…
_____________________
_____________________
_____________________
_____________________
_____________________
. . .but here is the
weakness . . .
_____________________
_____________________
_____________________
Here is what I think . . .
Evidence to back up my reasons
Strong Ending: So this is what I think again!
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
34. Answers
Jefferson: 1, 4, 8, 10
Hamilton: 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9
See handout for explanations
http://www.instituteofplay.org/work/projects/print-play-games-2/socratic-smackdown/
35. ReadWriteThink Activity
Using images from FCIT
Clip Art Galleries, create
trading cards for
influential people.
http://etc.usf.edu/clipart/galleries/713-people
Northwest Ordinance
The region west of the Appalachians had been settled by French and English traders and was one of the strategic objectives of both the French and Indian War and the American Revolution. Several states claimed portions of the region and reluctantly gave up claim to their lands in exchange for repudiation of their state Revolutionary War debts. Congress hoped to sell the public lands in the region to settle outstanding debt and to finance the operation of the new government. To rectify competing land claims, Confederation Congress passed the Land Ordinance of 1785. The law was significant in providing a mechanism for division of the land into rectangular sections. This methodology would be used each time the U.S. acquired new lands. The Land Ordinance was also significant because it provided a way for free public education to be financed through the sale of the Sixteenth section in each township.
The land north and west of the Ohio River became the Northwest Territory. It was the first territory created outside the original states. In 1787 Congress passed the Northwest Land Ordinance. The law provided for the method by which new territories would be admitted to the United States. The ordinance banned slavery in the Northwest Territory effectively making the Ohio River the boundary between free and slave regions. The Northwest region was a lawless region prior to the passage of the 1787 act. This law demonstrated to Americans that their national government intended to encourage westward expansion. The laws of the nation would follow its citizens across the continent. New states would be admitted to the nation as equal members of the Union.
Westward Movement
Americans have always looked westward. As the coastal plains filled, colonists arriving from Europe sought unclaimed land in the backcountry of each colony. After the French and Indian War, settlers crossed the Appalachians and entered the Tennessee and Ohio River Basins. After the American Revolution, settlers began to fill the Ohio Valley and moved out into western Georgia and Alabama. The conclusion of the Louisiana Purchase in 1803 doubled the size of America’s land holdings and brought new opportunities to move westward into the Mississippi River Valley. Florida, the last piece of foreign held territory in the east was acquired in 1819 from Spain. By 1850, Americans had settled California, Oregon and Washington. The process of settlement took 150 years to reach the Appalachians, 50 years to reach the Mississippi and another 30 years to settle the Pacific states. In 230 years, Americans had come to dominate the continent. Americans believed such rapid expansion must have been a result of divine favor referred to as Manifest Destiny.
Manifest Destiny was a phrase coined to describe the belief that America was to expand and settle the entire continent of North America. The phrase originated in 1845 when John L. O’Sullivan, a newspaper editor, wrote that it was America’s "Manifest Destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions."
The center of population growth in the years after the War of 1812 was in future states of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, and northern Kentucky. In this region three factors encouraged families in the eastern states to move into the Midwest. First, Native Americans were removed from the region. Second, land speculators had acquired large tracts of land and were eager to sell. Third, as the national infrastructure moved westward it was easier to migrate west. Although interest rates on land were high, so were grain prices throughout the 1830’s and 1840’s. Fertile soil and the development of better plows and harvesters allowing farmers large crops yields and increasing the allure of westward expansion.
use this image early on in my western history classes for several reasons. First, even students with little experience in talking about visual images find it easy to talk about what they see here. Second, students quickly grasp that although the painting does not convey a realistic representation of actual events, it nonetheless expresses a powerful historical idea about the meaning of America’s westward expansion. This sparks a discussion about the ways in which ideas—whether grounded in material fact or not—can both reflect and shape human actions. Finally, after a discussion of the larger cultural ideas embodied in this image, we move to a discussion of Frederick Jackson Turner’s celebrated 1893 essay, “The Significance of the Frontier in American History.” Students quickly perceive that while Turner had a way with words, his argument was not wholly original. He distilled ideas already present in American popular thought and many of them are present in this painting, painted some two decades earlier.
As students begin to describe what they see, they quickly realize that they’re looking at a kind of historical encyclopedia of transportation technologies. The simple Indian travois precedes the covered wagon and the pony express, the overland stage and the three railroad lines. The static painting thus conveys a vivid sense of the passage of time as well as of the inevitability of technological progress. The groups of human figures, read from left to right, convey much the same idea. Indians precede Euro-American prospectors, who in turn come before the farmers and settlers. The idea of progress coming from the East to the West, and the notion that the frontier would be developed by sequential waves of people (here and in Turner’s configuration, always men) was deeply rooted in American thought.
Then, of course, there is that “beautiful and charming female,” as Crofutt described her, whose diaphanous gown somehow remains attached to her body without the aid of velcro or safety pins. On her head she bears what Crofutt called “the Star of Empire.” And lest viewers still not understand her role in this vision of American destiny, he explains: “In her right hand she carries a book—common school—the emblem of education and the testimonial of our national enlightenment, while with the left hand she unfolds and stretches the slender wires of the telegraph, that are to flash intelligence throughout the land.” The Indians flee from progress, unable to adjust to the shifting tides of history. The painting hints at the past, lays out a fantastic version of an evolving present, and finally lays out a vision of the future. A static picture conveys a dynamic story.
The ideas embodied in this painting not only suggest the broad sources for Turner’s essay about the importance of the frontier in American life, they suggest that his essay reached an audience for whom these ideas were already familiar. Students often imagine the issues raised by visual images to be peripheral to the more central questions raised by literary sources. The Gast painting, however, allows one to demonstrate the ways in which painters, too, could engage large historical questions, cultural stereotypes and political ideas, by using a visual vocabulary that viewers found both familiar and persuasive.
Louisiana Purchase
Louisiana was originally a part of New France the region had exchanged hands several times. In 1800, the region was ruled by Spain but was the home to many American merchants and farmers. New Orleans was the key port in the region and was an important outlet of American farm goods produced in the Ohio River Valley. President Jefferson sent Robert Livingston and James Monroe to France to inquire about the purchase of New Orleans for the United States in order to secure a permanent port on the Mississippi River. Napoleon, seeing an opportunity to finance his on-going conflicts in Europe and a way to keep the British from expanding in North America, agreed to sell the United States the entire region for $15 million. The purchase doubled the size of the United States. Lands critical for future expansion were secured and the United States had a secure port at New Orleans to export American goods abroad. Jefferson entered the office a strict Constitutional constructionist, but instead his purchase of Louisiana greatly expanded the power of the Presidency as the Constitution made no provision for this type of Presidential action.
Lewis and Clark Expedition
The Ohio Valley was being settled quickly. Jefferson had sensed that the destiny of the nation was tied to the Mississippi River Valley. Jefferson worried that the regional difficulty of communicating and trading with east coast could precipitate secession from the United States. When Jefferson purchased Louisiana, these fears were eased. No one was exactly sure what lay between St. Louis and the Pacific. Jefferson sent Meriwether Lewis and William Clark to explore Louisiana and the western lands all the way to the Pacific Ocean. On their 16-month expedition, Lewis and Clark charted the trails west, mapped rivers and mountain ranges, wrote descriptions and collected samples of unfamiliar animals and plants, and recorded facts and figures about the various Native American tribes and customs west of the Mississippi River. Most significantly, Lewis and Clark reached the Pacific Ocean and established a legal claim to the region along the Columbia River. This claim would allow for the future expansion of the United States to the Pacific Ocean.
- Document Information
o The turtle is successfully preventing the man from delivering his goods o The man is commenting on the pain causedo There is a British ship and smugglers in the backgroundo The turtle (Ograbme) represents the Embargo
- Document Inferenceso The Embargo was somewhat effective in preventing exports and imports o British continued to trade, breaking American policy; angered the USo Hurt American economy in certain areas
Monroe Doctrine
Following the end of the Napoleonic Wars, Spain’s colonial holdings gained their independence. When a possible Franco-Spanish alliance appeared imminent in 1823, President James Monroe warned the nations of Europe not to meddle in the politics of North and South America. When a group of European countries planned to help one another recapture American colonies that had gained independence, Monroe announced that the United States would prevent European nations from interfering with independent American countries. Further, Monroe said the United States would remain neutral in wars between European nations and would not interfere with their American colonies. In summary, the Monroe Doctrine defined a key aspect of U.S. foreign policy to which America still holds today.
1804 Title: The prairie dog sickened at the sting of the hornet or a diplomatic puppet exhibiting his deceptions / J[ames] Akin, fect
James Akin's earliest-known signed cartoon, "The Prairie Dog" is an anti-Jefferson satire, relating to Jefferson's covert negotiations for the purchase of West Florida from Spain in 1804. Jefferson, as a scrawny dog, is stung by a hornet with Napoleon's head into coughing up "Two Millions" in gold coins, (the secret appropriation Jefferson sought from Congress for the purchase). On the right dances a man (possibly a French diplomat) with orders from French minister Talleyrand in his pocket and maps of East Florida and West Florida in his hand. He says, "A gull for the People.”
James Akin's earliest-known signed cartoon, "The Prairie Dog" is an anti-Jefferson satire, relating to Jefferson's covert negotiations for the purchase of West Florida from Spain in 1804. Jefferson, as a scrawny dog, is stung by a hornet with Napoleon's head into coughing up "Two Millions" in gold coins, (the secret appropriation Jefferson sought from Congress for the purchase). On the right dances a man (possibly a French diplomat) with orders from French minister Talleyrand in his pocket and maps of East Florida and West Florida in his hand. He says, "A gull for the People."
Title: Anti annexation procession
Related Names:
Baillie, James S., active 1838-1855 , lithgrapher
Bucholzer, H.
Date Created/Published: N.Y. : Lith. & pubd. by James Baillie, 1844.
Medium: 1 print : lithograph on wove paper ; 31.8 x 42.9 cm. (image)
Summary: A cynical look at the opposition to American annexation of Texas during the 1844 campaign. At the head of a motley procession is Whig candidate and professed anti-annexationist Henry Clay, riding a raccoon (which looks more like a fox). He is followed by three groups of men. The first (right) are the "Hartford Convention Blue-Lights," who shout, "God save the King!" and "Millions for Tribute! not a cent for defence Go it Strong!" Next (center) is a line of "Sunday Mail Petitioners," led by Clay's strongly religious running-mate Theodore Frelinghuysen, riding a donkey and dressed in clerical robes. They represent the proponents of eliminating postal service on Sundays in the United States, whose campaign was criticized by many as a threat to the separation of church and state. One of them remarks, "I go for the Good old times! wholesome, Fine and Imprisonment!" Prominent antislavery advocate William Lloyd Garrison leads the third group. He displays the banner of "Non Resistance, No Government No Laws--Except the 15 Gallon Law!" His followers are the "Abolition Martyrs" (far left), who have been tarred-and-feathered for their activism.
Mexican-American War Causes
In 1845, the United States, under the leadership of President James Polk, took Texas into the Union. The war began as a result over differing frontier claims. The United States insisted that the U.S.-Mexican border was the Rio Grande, while Mexico insisted that the border was marked by the Nueces River (150 miles north of the Rio Grande). In addition, it was clear to Mexico that the United States had set its sights on the Mexican territories of New Mexico and California. The United States had attempted twice to purchase the territories from Mexico. When the United States sent troops south of the Nueces to Rio Grande, the Mexican Army attacked the cavalry patrols.
The War
As the war developed, the United States attacked on two fronts. First U.S. forces occupied California. Second, a large American force invaded Mexico from Texas. Mexican forces were defeated and the United States occupied much of northern Mexico. As this northern force, under Zachery Taylor advanced south, a second force landed at Vera Cruz, under Winfield Scott. Scott’s forces advanced overland from the coast, attacked Mexico City, and captured it on August 7, 1846.
The Treaty—Guadalupe-Hidalgo, 1848
As the war was coming to a conclusion, Nicolas Trist, an official with the Secretary of State was sent by President Polk to negotiate an armistice with the Mexican government. Trist found the political situation in Mexico chaotic with the absence of Mexican President Santa Anna and negotiated a peace treaty with other members of the government. The treaty resembled the pre-war attempts of the United States to acquire Mexican territory. Provisions included:
The Rio Grande would be the recognized border between the United States and Mexico,
Mexico ceded the territories of California and New Mexico (eventually becoming all or parts of seven states). The area became known as the Mexican Cession.
The United States paid $15 million to the Mexican government and assumed the claims of American citizens against the Mexican government.
Wilmot Proviso
When the Hidalgo treaty was introduced to Congress for ratification, it immediately was caught up in the tensions between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions. Pennsylvania Representative David Wilmot introduced legislation in the House that boldly declared "neither slavery nor involuntary servitude shall ever exist" in lands won in the Mexican-American War. Wilmot and other Northern representatives had grown tired of President Polk and his allies continual blocking of internal improvement bills in the House and were worried that the extension of slavery into California would harm free labor. The proviso passed through the House where northern states held the majority but failed in the Senate where the division between free and slave states was equal. The issue of whether to allow or prohibit slavery in new states remained unresolved.
In 1828, gold was discovered on land belonging to the Cherokee Indians in Georgia. This made the land even more desirable to white settlers who had begun expanding south and westward. In the fall and winter of 1838-1839, 15,000 Cherokees were forced out of their ancestral lands to make room for those settlers. They were made to move to what is now Oklahoma, a journey of 1,200 miles. About 4,000 Cherokees died on the way.
The route that they followed is known as "The Trail of Tears" or "The Trail Where They Cried" because of how much they suffered on the way. Hopkinsville, Kentucky, was a stopping point on that journey. In 1993, the Trail of Tears Commemorative Park opened in Hopkinsville to honor the Cherokees and all Indians, the original inhabitants of America.
Compromise of 1850
The Compromise of 1850 was four years in the making. Northern Whigs and Southern Democrats engaged in heated attacks on one another on the status of slavery in the Mexican Cession. Then the discovery of gold in California in 1848 rapidly increased the population of the territory past the 100,000 citizens’ necessary for statehood. As a part of their plan of statehood, Californians drew up a state constitution that outlawed slavery in the proposed state.
Southern politicians objected to California’s admission as a free state on two points. First, Southerners argued that the exclusion of slavery in the territory violated the Missouri Compromise (the compromise line split the state). Second, Northerners already controlled the House and Southerners feared the admission of California would upset the balance of free and slave states in the Senate. Northern and southern representatives argued bitterly over California. Finally, Henry Clay, who defused tensions previously with the Missouri Compromise in 1820 and a compromise tariff in 1833, (earning Clay the title of the “Great Compromiser”) presented a plan that Clay hoped would solve the impasse. Debates between John C. Calhoun, representing the Southern position, and Daniel Webster, representing the Northern position, raged over the bill. Numerous votes were taken, but the extremists on both sides prevented passage of the bill. Clay and Calhoun both left the Senate too ill to continue. Senator Stephen A. Douglas (Illinois) and Daniel Webster (Massachusetts) worked to split Clay’s bill into separate bills so that Congressmen could vote on each separately. The five bills then moved through Congress and were passed.
Collectively, the five laws were known as the Compromise of 1850. The compromise stated:
The state of New Mexico would be established by carving its borders from the state of Texas.
New Mexico voters would determine whether the state would permit or prohibit the practice of slavery.
California would be admitted to the Union as a free state.
All citizens would be required to apprehend runaway slaves and return them
to their owners. Those who failed to do so would be fined or imprisoned.
The slave trade would be abolished in the District of Columbia, but the
practice of slavery would be allowed to continue there.
Despite passage of the bills, the Compromise of 1850 eased sectional tensions over slavery for only a short time.
In the years leading up to the Missouri Compromise of 1820, tensions began to rise between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions within the U.S. Congress and across the country. They reached a boiling point after Missouri’s 1819 request for admission to the Union as a slave state, which threatened to upset the delicate balance between slave states and free states. To keep the peace, Congress orchestrated a two-part compromise, granting Missouri’s request but also admitting Maine as a free state. It also passed an amendment that drew an imaginary line across the former Louisiana Territory, establishing a boundary between free and slave regions that remained the law of the land until it was negated by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854.
Missouri Compromise of 1820
The admission of Missouri as a new state is an excellent illustration of how Congress sought to maintain a “perfect equilibrium” between the number of free and slave states. The admission of Missouri would have kept the number of free and slave states balanced. However, attempts were made to limit slavery within the new state. Southern Senators killed the measure in committee. In December 1819, Alabama was admitted to the Union (as a slave state) restoring the balance of free and slave states. When Missouri petitioned in early 1820 for admission, northern Senators were reluctant to agree because the balance of power would favor slave states. However, Maine had petitioned the Senate for admission also. Senators linked the admission of Maine and Missouri together and added a last minute provision restricting slavery to a line south of latitude 36°, 30” (Missouri’s southern border), excepting Missouri itself. Northern Senators hoped to restrict the further expansion of slavery into the Louisiana Territory. The Missouri Compromise passed.
Compromise of 1850
The Compromise of 1850 was four years in the making. Northern Whigs and Southern Democrats engaged in heated attacks on one another on the status of slavery in the Mexican Cession. Then the discovery of gold in California in 1848 rapidly increased the population of the territory past the 100,000 citizens’ necessary for statehood. As a part of their plan of statehood, Californians drew up a state constitution that outlawed slavery in the proposed state.
Southern politicians objected to California’s admission as a free state on two points. First, Southerners argued that the exclusion of slavery in the territory violated the Missouri Compromise (the compromise line split the state). Second, Northerners already controlled the House and Southerners feared the admission of California would upset the balance of free and slave states in the Senate. Northern and southern representatives argued bitterly over California. Finally, Henry Clay, who defused tensions previously with the Missouri Compromise in 1820 and a compromise tariff in 1833, (earning Clay the title of the “Great Compromiser”) presented a plan that Clay hoped would solve the impasse. Debates between John C. Calhoun, representing the Southern position, and Daniel Webster, representing the Northern position, raged over the bill. Numerous votes were taken, but the extremists on both sides prevented passage of the bill. Clay and Calhoun both left the Senate too ill to continue. Senator Stephen A. Douglas (Illinois) and Daniel Webster (Massachusetts) worked to split Clay’s bill into separate bills so that Congressmen could vote on each separately. The five bills then moved through Congress and were passed.
Collectively, the five laws were known as the Compromise of 1850. The compromise stated:
The state of New Mexico would be established by carving its borders from the state of Texas.
New Mexico voters would determine whether the state would permit or prohibit the practice of slavery.
California would be admitted to the Union as a free state.
All citizens would be required to apprehend runaway slaves and return them
to their owners. Those who failed to do so would be fined or imprisoned.
The slave trade would be abolished in the District of Columbia, but the
practice of slavery would be allowed to continue there.
Despite passage of the bills, the Compromise of 1850 eased sectional tensions over slavery for only a short time.
Three issues in the last years of the 1850’s further polarized the nation over the issue of slavery and pushed the North and South toward open conflict.Kansas-Nebraska Act
The rich farm lands west of Missouri beckoned families and investors. In 1852 and 1853, Congress considered creating the territories of Kansas and Nebraska for settlement. The legislation caught the attention of southern Congressmen who refused to consider the creation of the new territories unless the provisions were made for southerners to bring slaves into the territories. Northern representatives argued that the expansion of slavery into the new territories was a violation of the Missouri Compromise. In 1854, Congress again took up the issue of slavery in new U.S. states and territories. Stephen A. Douglas included a provision using popular sovereignty (rule by the people), which would allow the citizens of the territory to decide whether or not slavery would be allowed. Southerners hoped that by allowing the people to decide the issue that more slave states could be added. After a great deal of rancorous debate in both Houses, the bill was approved.
The passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act had several effects. First, the Kansas- Nebraska Act virtually repealed the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and the Compromise of 1850. Settlers in all new territories would have the right to decide for themselves whether their new home would be a free or a slave state.
Second, pro- and antislavery groups hurried into Kansas in an attempt to create voting majorities there. Antislavery abolitionists came from eastern states; proslavery settlers came mainly from neighboring Missouri. Some of these Missourians settled in Kansas, but many more stayed there only long enough to vote for slavery and then returned to Missouri. Proslavery voters elected a legislature ready to make Kansas a slave state. Abolitionists then elected a rival Kansas government with an antislavery constitution, established a different capital city, and raised an army. Proslavery Kansans reacted by raising their own army. Violence between the two sides created warlike conditions that lead to the territory being referred to as “Bleeding Kansas.” Ultimately, in 1859, a constitution reflecting an abolitionist point of view was approved by both citizens in Kansas and the Congress. Popular sovereignty, excepting voter fraud, proved a failure for pro- slavery forces.
Third, politically, the passage of the act split the existent political parties and gave rise to the Republican Party. President Pierce’s inability to control the violence in Kansas led to his defeat in the election of 1856. Abraham Lincoln made his initial national reputation in a failed attempt at Douglas’ Illinois Congressional seat by debating the Kansas-Nebraska Act.