Introductory slides on Utilization Focused Evaluation (UFE) that I presented to the ROER4D team (http://roer4d.org/) on 22 September 2014 as part of the project's evaluation process.
This presentation has a vivid description of the basics of doing a program evaluation, with detailed explanation of the " Log Frame work " ( LFA) with practical example from the CLICS project. This presentation also includes the CDC framework for evaluation of program.
N.B: Kindly open the ppt in slide share mode to fully use all the animations wheresoever made.
This gives the information about programme evaluation, planning of evaluation, requirement and purpose of evaluation, steps involved in evaluation, Uses of evaluation, Stakeholder and their role in evaluation, finding and analysing the result of evaluation, Standards of effective evaluation, utilization of evaluation.
This presentation has a vivid description of the basics of doing a program evaluation, with detailed explanation of the " Log Frame work " ( LFA) with practical example from the CLICS project. This presentation also includes the CDC framework for evaluation of program.
N.B: Kindly open the ppt in slide share mode to fully use all the animations wheresoever made.
This gives the information about programme evaluation, planning of evaluation, requirement and purpose of evaluation, steps involved in evaluation, Uses of evaluation, Stakeholder and their role in evaluation, finding and analysing the result of evaluation, Standards of effective evaluation, utilization of evaluation.
An overview of impact evaluation for organizations based on a program's Theory of Change, highlighting the need for a counterfactual and randomization (when possible) in order to convincingly demonstrate the effect of the program.
Build Your NGO: Monitoring & Evaluation Allie Hoffman
The presentation attached is designed for grassroots NGOs wanting to learn more about monitoring and evaluation.
The presentation is a mini 'how to', in addition to providing an overview of strategic planning
To learn more or with any direct questions, please visit our website: www.thepariproject.com
Evaluation: a means to gain insights into and improve the ROER4D projectROER4D
A shortened version of a presentation ROER4D's Evaluation Advisor, Sarah Goodier, gave to the University of Cape Town's Research & Evaluation of Emerging Technologies PGDip course on the evaluation strategy for ROER4D.
An overview of impact evaluation for organizations based on a program's Theory of Change, highlighting the need for a counterfactual and randomization (when possible) in order to convincingly demonstrate the effect of the program.
Build Your NGO: Monitoring & Evaluation Allie Hoffman
The presentation attached is designed for grassroots NGOs wanting to learn more about monitoring and evaluation.
The presentation is a mini 'how to', in addition to providing an overview of strategic planning
To learn more or with any direct questions, please visit our website: www.thepariproject.com
Evaluation: a means to gain insights into and improve the ROER4D projectROER4D
A shortened version of a presentation ROER4D's Evaluation Advisor, Sarah Goodier, gave to the University of Cape Town's Research & Evaluation of Emerging Technologies PGDip course on the evaluation strategy for ROER4D.
Evaluation: a means to gain insights into and improve the ROER4D project SarahG_SS
A shortened version of a presentation given to the EDN4502W: Research & Evaluation of Emerging Technologies PGDip course on the evaluation strategy for ROER4D.
A presentation for my Ed. D. Degree Program relating to Program Evaluation Models: Developers of the Management-Oriented Evaluation Approach and their Contributions;
How the Management-Oriented Evaluation Approach Has Been Used; Strengths and Limitations of the Management-Oriented Evaluation Approach; Other References, Questions for Discussion
Developing an evaluation strategy to gain insights into the ROER4D multi-nati...SarahG_SS
Presentation at the OE Global Conference held in Banff, Canada in April 2015. This presentation introduces the development of the evaluation strategy, using Utilization Focused Evaluation (UFE), for the ROER4D Project (http://roer4d.org/).
You can access the abstract here: http://conference.oeconsortium.org/2015/presentation/developing-an-evaluation-strategy-to-gain-insights-into-a-multi-national-project-roer4d/
SUBJECT: SOCIO EDUCATIONAL PROJECT
TUTOR: DR. MIGUEL PONCE
THEME: PART III. PROJECT EVALUATION
STUDENTS:
MONTESDEOCA BENITEZ DIANA PRISCILA
PACHACAMA SIMBAÑA DAYSI ALEXANDRA
Workbook for Designing a Process Evaluation MoseStaton39
Workbook
for
Designing
a Process
Evaluation
Produced for the
Georgia Department of Human
Resources
Division of Public Health
By
Melanie J. Bliss, M.A.
James G. Emshoff, Ph.D.
Department of Psychology
Georgia State University
July 2002
Evaluation Expert Session
July 16, 2002 Page 1
What is process evaluation?
Process evaluation uses empirical data to assess the delivery of
programs. In contrast to outcome evaluation, which assess the
impact of the program, process evaluation verifies what the
program is and whether it is being implemented as designed. Thus,
process evaluation asks "what," and outcome evaluation asks, "so
what?"
When conducting a process evaluation, keep in mind these three
questions:
1. What is the program intended to be?
2. What is delivered, in reality?
3. Where are the gaps between program design and delivery?
This workbook will serve as a guide for designing your own process
evaluation for a program of your choosing. There are many steps involved
in the implementation of a process evaluation, and this workbook will
attempt to direct you through some of the main stages. It will be helpful to
think of a delivery service program that you can use as your example as
you complete these activities.
Why is process evaluation important?
1. To determine the extent to which the program is being
implemented according to plan
2. To assess and document the degree of fidelity and variability in
program implementation, expected or unexpected, planned or
unplanned
3. To compare multiple sites with respect to fidelity
4. To provide validity for the relationship between the intervention
and the outcomes
5. To provide information on what components of the intervention
are responsible for outcomes
6. To understand the relationship between program context (i.e.,
setting characteristics) and program processes (i.e., levels of
implementation).
7. To provide managers feedback on the quality of implementation
8. To refine delivery components
9. To provide program accountability to sponsors, the public, clients,
and funders
10. To improve the quality of the program, as the act of evaluating is
an intervention.
Evaluation Expert Session
July 16, 2002 Page 2
Stages of Process Evaluation Page Number
1. Form Collaborative Relationships 3
2. Determine Program Components 4
3. Develop Logic Model*
4. Determine Evaluation Questions 6
5. Determine Methodology 11
6. Consider a Management Information System 25
7. Implement Data Collection and Analysis 28
8. Write Report**
Also included in this workbook:
a. Logic Model Template 30
b. Pitfalls to avoid ...
Workbook for Designing a Process Evaluation .docxAASTHA76
Workbook
for
Designing
a Process
Evaluation
Produced for the
Georgia Department of Human
Resources
Division of Public Health
By
Melanie J. Bliss, M.A.
James G. Emshoff, Ph.D.
Department of Psychology
Georgia State University
July 2002
Evaluation Expert Session
July 16, 2002 Page 1
What is process evaluation?
Process evaluation uses empirical data to assess the delivery of
programs. In contrast to outcome evaluation, which assess the
impact of the program, process evaluation verifies what the
program is and whether it is being implemented as designed. Thus,
process evaluation asks "what," and outcome evaluation asks, "so
what?"
When conducting a process evaluation, keep in mind these three
questions:
1. What is the program intended to be?
2. What is delivered, in reality?
3. Where are the gaps between program design and delivery?
This workbook will serve as a guide for designing your own process
evaluation for a program of your choosing. There are many steps involved
in the implementation of a process evaluation, and this workbook will
attempt to direct you through some of the main stages. It will be helpful to
think of a delivery service program that you can use as your example as
you complete these activities.
Why is process evaluation important?
1. To determine the extent to which the program is being
implemented according to plan
2. To assess and document the degree of fidelity and variability in
program implementation, expected or unexpected, planned or
unplanned
3. To compare multiple sites with respect to fidelity
4. To provide validity for the relationship between the intervention
and the outcomes
5. To provide information on what components of the intervention
are responsible for outcomes
6. To understand the relationship between program context (i.e.,
setting characteristics) and program processes (i.e., levels of
implementation).
7. To provide managers feedback on the quality of implementation
8. To refine delivery components
9. To provide program accountability to sponsors, the public, clients,
and funders
10. To improve the quality of the program, as the act of evaluating is
an intervention.
Evaluation Expert Session
July 16, 2002 Page 2
Stages of Process Evaluation Page Number
1. Form Collaborative Relationships 3
2. Determine Program Components 4
3. Develop Logic Model*
4. Determine Evaluation Questions 6
5. Determine Methodology 11
6. Consider a Management Information System 25
7. Implement Data Collection and Analysis 28
8. Write Report**
Also included in this workbook:
a. Logic Model Template 30
b. Pitfalls to avoid .
Workbook for Designing a Process Evaluation MikeEly930
Workbook
for
Designing
a Process
Evaluation
Produced for the
Georgia Department of Human
Resources
Division of Public Health
By
Melanie J. Bliss, M.A.
James G. Emshoff, Ph.D.
Department of Psychology
Georgia State University
July 2002
Evaluation Expert Session
July 16, 2002 Page 1
What is process evaluation?
Process evaluation uses empirical data to assess the delivery of
programs. In contrast to outcome evaluation, which assess the
impact of the program, process evaluation verifies what the
program is and whether it is being implemented as designed. Thus,
process evaluation asks "what," and outcome evaluation asks, "so
what?"
When conducting a process evaluation, keep in mind these three
questions:
1. What is the program intended to be?
2. What is delivered, in reality?
3. Where are the gaps between program design and delivery?
This workbook will serve as a guide for designing your own process
evaluation for a program of your choosing. There are many steps involved
in the implementation of a process evaluation, and this workbook will
attempt to direct you through some of the main stages. It will be helpful to
think of a delivery service program that you can use as your example as
you complete these activities.
Why is process evaluation important?
1. To determine the extent to which the program is being
implemented according to plan
2. To assess and document the degree of fidelity and variability in
program implementation, expected or unexpected, planned or
unplanned
3. To compare multiple sites with respect to fidelity
4. To provide validity for the relationship between the intervention
and the outcomes
5. To provide information on what components of the intervention
are responsible for outcomes
6. To understand the relationship between program context (i.e.,
setting characteristics) and program processes (i.e., levels of
implementation).
7. To provide managers feedback on the quality of implementation
8. To refine delivery components
9. To provide program accountability to sponsors, the public, clients,
and funders
10. To improve the quality of the program, as the act of evaluating is
an intervention.
Evaluation Expert Session
July 16, 2002 Page 2
Stages of Process Evaluation Page Number
1. Form Collaborative Relationships 3
2. Determine Program Components 4
3. Develop Logic Model*
4. Determine Evaluation Questions 6
5. Determine Methodology 11
6. Consider a Management Information System 25
7. Implement Data Collection and Analysis 28
8. Write Report**
Also included in this workbook:
a. Logic Model Template 30
b. Pitfalls to avoid ...
Evaluation is a systematic process to understand what a program does and how well the program does it. Evaluation results can be used to maintain or improve program quality and to ensure that future planning can be more evidence-based.
in this topic i cover SWOT analysis, mile stone , Gantt chart, PERT, CPM, Bennett's hierarchy evaluation , logical framework approach
Evaluating an open research project: Benefits and challenges from the ROER4D ...SarahG_SS
Presentation made at the Open Education Global 2017 Conference held at the CTICC from 8-10 March 2017. This presentation looked at the the evaluation of the ROER4D project, a project that is committed to open research. The open approach in the project work informed the evaluation approach used and has highlighted considerations around the ethical sharing of evaluation findings and outputs, including at which stage and with whom. Some of the benefits and challenges of evaluating such an open project are presented.
Strategies and tools to map and analyse developing networks: The case of usin...SarahG_SS
My input into a longer workshop action lab session given at the Open Education Global 2017 Conference held at the CTICC from 8-10 March 2017. This presentation provides a very brief introduction to social network analysis (SNA) and covers how this type of analysis has been used in the ROER4D project evaluation. A few ideas of how other projects can use the NodeXL tools to visualise their networks is also presented.
Evaluating an Open Research project: Balancing the imperative to share with e...SarahG_SS
A poster presented at the joint International Consortium for Educational Development (ICED) and Higher Education Learning and Teaching Association of Southern Africa (HELTASA) Conference 2016 held at the University of Cape Town from 23-25 November 2016. This poster reports on the evaluation of the Research on Open Educational Resources for Development (ROER4D) project, a project that is commitment to open research. Some of the emerging benefits and drawbacks of conducting an evaluation on an open research project are highlighted.
Evaluating Twitter network growth: A case study using Social Network AnalysisSarahG_SS
A presentation given at the European Evaluation Society 2016 Conference held at MECC Maastricht from 26-30 September 2016. This presentation outlines a part of the Networking evaluation for the ROER4D project, focusing on Twitter reach and engagement and the social network analysis (SNA) tools workflow that enables the data collection and analysis.
Reflections on developing an evaluation and communications strategy for the R...SarahG_SS
A joint presentation given at the DECI-2 Workshop held in Cape Town on 3-5 May 2016. This presentation briefly outlines the ROER4D project and then briefly explores the evaluation and communications strategy. This presentation also gives feedback to the DECI-2 project on what worked and some sugestions for improvement in their mentoring process of the ROER4D project.
User focused evaluation: Feedback on research capacity building webinarsSarahG_SS
A presentation given at the deferred UCT 2015 Teaching and Learning Conference held at UCT on 30 March 2016. This presentation briefly outlines some of the evaluation work conducted on ROER4D’s research capacity building webinars, focusing on the first 12-webinar series conducted in 2014.
The iterative engagement between curation and evaluation in an open research ...SarahG_SS
Presentation at the African Virtual University (AVU) in Nairobi, Kenya in July 2015. This practice-based presentation outlines the iterative engagement between ROER4D’s curation strategy and evaluation of this project objective, and analyses how this facilitates development of the evaluation plan. Opportunities and challenges of developing and evaluating a curation strategy for such a large-scale open research project are also highlighted.
Using the Altmetric.com bookmarklet and ImpactStory_5June2014SarahG_SS
This presentation was given at an Altmetrics seminar at the UCT Research Office on 5 June 2014.
A previous version of this presentation was given during an OpenUCT Impact Analysis Pilot Discussion on 6 May 2014 (http://goo.gl/NWoJ7K). This discussion included a look at tools, methodologies and considerations for measuring impact of scholarly outputs, with a focus on altmetrics.
Visibility, impact & online presence for the developing science researcher (M...SarahG_SS
An introductory presentation for a session of UCT's Write Science course, introducing developing science researchers to the concept of online presence and a few tools to start establishing their professional online presence.
This presentation is a step by step introduction to ImpactStory, an online tool (by Heather Piwowar and Jason Priem) that helps researchers look at the impact of their research outputs.
You can use ImpactStory to get an idea who is bookmarking, recommending, saving and citing your papers as well as other outputs (e.g. software and blog posts) and where this is happening.
(Note: This is the version 7 of this presentation; due to several changes to ImpactStory a few updates have been required since the original upload)
Creating and adapting teaching materials for sharing workshop 11_march2013_up...SarahG_SS
My (introductory) half of a workshop aimed at postgraduate students interested in creating and adapting teaching materials for sharing. This presentation was to introduce the concept of open education and OERs. (Please note: I have provided links to the two videos, not embedded them, please watch them via the links.)
Academics' online presence: Assessing and shaping your online visibility_26oc...SarahG_SS
In our digital world, if you use the web, you have an online presence. And academics are no exception. Universities have webpages profiling their staff. Academic networks, like LinkedIn, Academia.edu and more, are used by researchers around the globe to keep in contact with colleagues and collaborators. And social media are everywhere you turn.
As an academic, you want your research outputs to be found and read. Making a difference and having an influence is almost a job requirement. Nowadays, the expectation is that you can be found online. So, what can you do to be aware of how you appear online? And, what can you do to increase your visibility? This presentation was part of a session for academics wanting to find out how they can review their existing digital footprints and shadows, make decisions about what kind of online presence they would like and plan how they can achieve it.
Several different possible ways of increasing their visibility as well as the visibility of their research and their outputs are discussed.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Utilization focused evaluation: an introduction (Part 1 - ROER4D)
1. UFE step-by-step:
an introduction
Modified from slides by:
Joaquín Navas & Ricardo Ramírez (December 2009)
By Sarah Goodier
ROER4D Evaluation Advisor
2. Project evaluation is…
Systematic collection of information about the:
- activities,
- characteristics and
- results
of project
3. Project evaluation is…
Systematic collection of information about the:
- activities,
- characteristics and
- results
of project to make:
- judgments about the project,
- improve or further develop project effectiveness,
- inform decisions about future programming,
and/or
- increase understanding
4. A collaborative approach means…
• Maintenance of an ongoing focus on LEARNING.
• Clarification of ROLES and EXPECTATIONS.
• Creation of spaces for DIALOGUE.
• JOINT FOCUS on all issues being investigated.
• Attention to the VALIDATION of findings.
• Joint INTERPRETATION of results.
5. Utilization focused evaluation is…
A decision-making framework for
enhancing the utility and actual use
of evaluations.
(Patton, 2008a: slide 9)
6. Utilization focused evaluation is…
A decision-making framework for
enhancing the utility and actual use
of evaluations.
(Patton, 2008a: slide 9)
7. Utilization focused evaluation is…
A PROCESS for helping primary
intended users (PIUs) select the most
appropriate content, model,
methods, theory and uses for their
particular situation.
8. Utilization focused evaluation is…
Evaluation done for and with
specific, intended primary USERS
(= PIUs)
for specific, intended USES.
9. What are uses?
“USES” refers to the way real people
in the real world APPLY evaluation
findings and experience the
evaluation PROCESS.
(Patton, 2008a: slide 9)
10. Uses in ROER4D: think about
How would we APPLY evaluation
findings in ROER4D?
How can the evaluation PROCESS
help us?
11. Utilization focused evaluation is…
1. Evaluations should be JUDGED by their utility and ACTUAL USE.
2. No evaluation should go forward unless and until there are primary
intended users who will use the information that can be produced.
3. Primary intended users are involved in the process.
4. Evaluation is part of initial program design. The primary intended users
want information to help answer a question or questions.
5. Evaluator’s role is to help intended users clarify their purpose and
objectives.
6. Implications for use are part of every decision throughout the
evaluation – it is the driving force of the evaluation process. (Patton,
2008a)
12. UFE in 12 steps:
1. Assessing program readiness
2. Assessing evaluator readiness
3. Identifying primary intended users
4. Situational analysis
5. Identification of primary intended uses
6. Focusing the evaluation
7. Evaluation design
8. Simulation of use
9. Data collection
10. Data analysis
11. Facilitation of use
12. Meta evaluation
14. References
Navas, J. and Ramírez, R. (2009). Facilitating UFE step-by-step: a
process guide for evaluators (Module 1: Steps 1-3 of UFE
checklist). Available online at: http://evaluationinpractice.files.
wordpress.com/2010/02/ufe_steps1to3.ppt.
Navas, J. and Ramírez, R. (2009). Facilitating UFE step-by-step: a
process guide for evaluators (Module 2: Steps 4-6 of UFE
checklist). Available online at: http://evaluationinpractice.
files.wordpress.com/2011/08/sleva2ufe_steps4to6.ppt
Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization focused evaluation. Presentation
to the AEA.
Ramírez, R. and Brodhead, D. (2013). Utilization focused
evaluation: a primer for evaluators. Southbound, Penang.
Available online at: http://evaluationinpractice.files.wordpress.
com/2013/04/ufeenglishprimer.pdf
15. Thank you
Excluding
images,
screenshots
and logos
and/or
unless
otherwise
indicated on
content