The document discusses various tools from Thomson Reuters for research evaluation, including Web of Science for analyzing scholarly literature and citations, EndNote Web for managing references and citations, and ResearcherID for identifying individual researchers and analyzing their impact, collaboration networks, and publications. It provides demonstrations of these tools' capabilities for analyzing research at the journal, institution, and individual researcher levels.

1. David Horky Country Manager – Central & Eastern Europe david.horky@thomsonreuters.com Solutions for Research Evaluation from Thomson Reuters

2. Agenda Web of Science – Life Demonstration EndNote Web – Life Demonstration ResearcherID Questions 2

3. Web of Science® : STANDARD for Research Evaluation “Multidisciplinary” coverage enable to analyze the whole context of scientific research “Multiyear” coverage enable to analyze the history and development of sciences “Cover to Cover” policy enable to follow the flow of a topic regardless of communication type “ALL Authors, ALL Addresses” enable to analyze by author name, by institution “ALL Cited References” enable to perform analyses on literature that is not indexed The CONSISTENCY enables large-scale counting and reliable analyses

4. Citation Linking 2004 2006 2003 Times Cited 2007 2000 Cited References 2000 Related Records 1974 1998 2004 1993 1999 2002 1994

5. References Cite While You Write™ While writing a paper in MS Word, utilize an EndNote Web toolbar to: Search and “Find Citations” within one’s End Note Web Folders and… -- insert the appropriate reference within the text and… -- automatically insert the complete cited reference in the bibliography of the paper… -- in the format that you choose.

6. WEB OF SCIENCE JOURNAL SELECTION POLICY Why do we select journals?

10. WEB OF SCIENCE JOURNAL SELECTION POLICY Approx. 2000 journals evaluated annually 10-12% accepted Thomson Reuters editors Information professionals Librarians Experts in the literature of their subject area Journal ‘quality’ Web of Science Journals under evaluation

11. THOMSON REUTERSJOURNAL SELECTION POLICY Publishing Standards Peer review, Editorial conventions Editorial content Addition to knowledge in specific subject field Diversity International, regional influence of authors, editors, advisors Citation analysis Editors and authors’ prior work Thomson Reuters journal selection process: http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/free/essays/journal_selection_process/

12. GLOBAL RESEARCH REPRESENTATION WEB OF SCIENCE COVERAGE

13. EVALUATING COUNTRIES

14. CHANGING NATURE OF HUNGARIAN RESEARCH 13 Hungary averaged just over 3,000 papers a year in the 70s – 90s. Now well over 7,000 papers per year

15. CHANGING NATURE OF HUNGARIAN RESEARCHINTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION 14 Between 1970 and 1999, 30% of Hungarian papers had at least one international author. In the last decade, 2000 – 2010, this figure has risen to 69%

16. SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY IN CENTRAL EUROPE 15 Thomson Reuters InCites

17. SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IMPACT IN CENTRAL EUROPE 16 Thomson Reuters InCites

18. EVALUATING INSTITUTIONS (1)EXTERNAL COMPARISONS

19. EVALUATING INSTITUTIONS Number of citations to North American scientific papers Source: Thomson Reuters North America University Science Indicators

20. INSTITUTIONAL COMPARISONSCOMPARING IMPACT IN BIOLOGY? 19 Cambridge Oxford Stirling Thomson Reuters InCites

21. INSTITUTIONAL COMPARISONSIN SPECIFIC FIELDS 20 Thomson Reuters InCites

22. INSTITUTIONAL COMPARISONSBIOLOGY PERFORMANCE 21 Thomson Reuters InCites

23. EVALUATING INSTITUTIONS (2)INTERNAL ANALYSIS

24. WHAT IS OUR RESEARCH OUTPUT? 23 Thomson Reuters InCites

25. HOW DID THIS PAPER PERFORM WITHIN ITS JOURNAL / FIELD? 24 This highly cited article is in the 0.006th percentile in its field Nature articles from this year have been cited 135.52 times Biochemistry and Molecular Biology articles from this year have been cited 23.98 times Thomson Reuters InCites

26. WHICH ARE OUR CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE? 25 Physical Chemistry Computer Science 41% below average 220% above average Thomson Reuters InCites

27. WITH WHOM DOES OUR FACULTY COLLABORATE? 26 Thomson Reuters InCites

28. WHICH OF THOSE COLLABORATIONS ARE THE MOST VALUABLE? 27 Thomson Reuters InCites

29. INCITESCITING ARTICLES LISTING Thomson Reuters InCites

30. CITING PAPERSIN THE FIELD OF PHYSICS 29 Thomson Reuters InCites

31. EVALUATING INDIVIDUALS

32. WHO ARE OUR MOST PRODUCTIVE AUTHORS? 31 Thomson Reuters InCites

33. WHO ARE OURMOST INFLUENTIAL RESEARCHERS? 32 Thomson Reuters InCites

34. WHICH AUTHORS HAVE MOST IMPACT? 33 Thomson Reuters InCites

35. WHICH AUTHORS’ PAPERS HAVE PERFORMED BEST IN THEIR FIELD? 34 Thomson Reuters InCites

36. HOW CAN WE COMPARE RESEARCHERS? 35 Author A: 60 papers Author B: 117 papers Thomson Reuters InCites

37. ResearcherID.com

38. RESEARCHERIDSCHOLARLY RESEARCH COMMUNITY Accurate Identification Organize and Manage Increase Visibility and Recognition Measure Performance Collaboration Security Science, March 2009

39. INDIVIDUAL LEVELRESEARCH EVALUATION See personalized metrics using Web of Science citation data View accurate publication list due to unique author identification

40. RESEARCHER IDANALYZE COLLABORATION NETWORK Seek global collaboration opportunities by author, field, institution or country

41. RESEARCHER IDVISUALIZE CITING ARTICLES NETWORK

42. RESEARCHER IDELECTRONIC CV RESOURCE ResearcherID Profile: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/A-9180-2008

43. Thank you!science.thomsonreuters.com/trainingresearchanalytics.thomsonreuters.com/incites David Horky Country Manager – Central & Eastern Europe david.horky@thomsonreuters.com