This survey aims to measure preservice teachers' knowledge of teaching and technology. Specifically, it assesses their knowledge across the following domains: technology knowledge (TK), content knowledge for mathematics, social studies, science and literacy (CK), pedagogical knowledge (PK), pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), technological content knowledge (TCK), technological pedagogical knowledge (TPK) and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). The survey has been tested for reliability, with Cronbach's alpha scores ranging from .78 to .93 for the different domains.
The document discusses aspects of curriculum design using several models. It introduces Biggs' 3Ps model, which describes the teaching-learning situation as having three stages: presage, process, and product. It then discusses an input-output model of educational systems, noting that in open systems not all components can be fixed. The document concludes by noting that if you want to put students through a standard course but have them come out with capabilities at a set level, you cannot fix all three components of input, process, and output.
This document discusses action research and provides guidance on conducting action research. It defines action research as a process of systematic inquiry to improve educational practices or resolve problems in classrooms and schools. It provides the bases and rationale for undertaking action research, including relevant Department of Education orders. It also outlines the typical components and steps in a research process, including developing research questions, reviewing literature, determining methodology, analyzing data, developing an action plan, and establishing a workplan and budget.
This document discusses inclusive assessment in higher education. It begins by outlining the rationale for inclusive assessment, including improving student learning, evaluation scores, and compliance with disability requirements. It then reviews common assessment practices and explores a variety of inclusive assessment methods like performance, group projects, and peer review. The document emphasizes that inclusive assessment should be accessible to all students without compromising rigor. It provides tips for inclusive design, such as aligning assessments to learning outcomes and using formative feedback. Overall, the document advocates for inclusive assessment as a way to benefit both students and faculty.
This document discusses the relationship between society and education. It states that sociology is the study of social beings and their behavior in groups, social structures, and relationships. It also discusses how education serves functions for society like imparting culture, providing skills for social roles, and catering to changing social needs. Schools exist within society and their curriculum is based on social conditions and problems. The goals of education include developing social skills and qualities, improving vocational skills, and transmitting social heritage.
This document defines and explains the process of action research. It states that action research is a process where teachers study their own instructional practices and student learning in order to improve. The process involves identifying a classroom problem, developing a plan to address it, collecting and analyzing data, and making instructional decisions and sharing results. It then outlines the phases of action research in more detail, including identifying problems, developing a research plan, collecting and analyzing data from multiple sources, and drawing conclusions to continue improving teaching practices.
This document discusses critical incident analysis (CIA), which is an approach to analyzing challenges that arise in everyday practice. CIA involves choosing an incident, describing it in detail, interrogating the description to understand different perspectives and lessons learned, discussing it with colleagues, and writing a brief report. The document provides examples of case studies where teachers analyzed critical incidents from their classroom, including incidents around late assignments, student engagement, and lack of student preparation. It emphasizes that CIA can help teachers reflect on their practice, understand incidents from various viewpoints, and make changes to address problems.
The document discusses aspects of curriculum design using several models. It introduces Biggs' 3Ps model, which describes the teaching-learning situation as having three stages: presage, process, and product. It then discusses an input-output model of educational systems, noting that in open systems not all components can be fixed. The document concludes by noting that if you want to put students through a standard course but have them come out with capabilities at a set level, you cannot fix all three components of input, process, and output.
This document discusses action research and provides guidance on conducting action research. It defines action research as a process of systematic inquiry to improve educational practices or resolve problems in classrooms and schools. It provides the bases and rationale for undertaking action research, including relevant Department of Education orders. It also outlines the typical components and steps in a research process, including developing research questions, reviewing literature, determining methodology, analyzing data, developing an action plan, and establishing a workplan and budget.
This document discusses inclusive assessment in higher education. It begins by outlining the rationale for inclusive assessment, including improving student learning, evaluation scores, and compliance with disability requirements. It then reviews common assessment practices and explores a variety of inclusive assessment methods like performance, group projects, and peer review. The document emphasizes that inclusive assessment should be accessible to all students without compromising rigor. It provides tips for inclusive design, such as aligning assessments to learning outcomes and using formative feedback. Overall, the document advocates for inclusive assessment as a way to benefit both students and faculty.
This document discusses the relationship between society and education. It states that sociology is the study of social beings and their behavior in groups, social structures, and relationships. It also discusses how education serves functions for society like imparting culture, providing skills for social roles, and catering to changing social needs. Schools exist within society and their curriculum is based on social conditions and problems. The goals of education include developing social skills and qualities, improving vocational skills, and transmitting social heritage.
This document defines and explains the process of action research. It states that action research is a process where teachers study their own instructional practices and student learning in order to improve. The process involves identifying a classroom problem, developing a plan to address it, collecting and analyzing data, and making instructional decisions and sharing results. It then outlines the phases of action research in more detail, including identifying problems, developing a research plan, collecting and analyzing data from multiple sources, and drawing conclusions to continue improving teaching practices.
This document discusses critical incident analysis (CIA), which is an approach to analyzing challenges that arise in everyday practice. CIA involves choosing an incident, describing it in detail, interrogating the description to understand different perspectives and lessons learned, discussing it with colleagues, and writing a brief report. The document provides examples of case studies where teachers analyzed critical incidents from their classroom, including incidents around late assignments, student engagement, and lack of student preparation. It emphasizes that CIA can help teachers reflect on their practice, understand incidents from various viewpoints, and make changes to address problems.
This document provides an overview of action research in education. It defines action research as a systematic inquiry conducted by educators to gather information and improve their own educational practices and student learning. The document discusses key characteristics of action research such as having a practical focus on the educator's own practices, involving collaboration, following a dynamic and cyclical process, developing a plan of action, and sharing research findings. It also outlines common steps to conducting action research and lists different techniques for collecting data, such as observation, questioning, and examining records.
This document outlines the steps for conducting research using a systems analysis approach. It discusses systems analysis as a method for examining educational systems as interrelated parts within a larger socio-economic environment. The 4 main steps are: 1) Identify the goals of the educational program, 2) Gather data on subsystems and their interrelationships, 3) Construct an instrument to evaluate student outcomes, and 4) Analyze and interpret the data on inputs, processes, and outputs against the program goals. Conducting research using this systems approach allows for analyzing specific problems or an entire school system.
Sociology and anthropology are relevant to education. Sociology is the scientific study of human society and interactions, helping teachers understand students' backgrounds. Anthropology is the study of humans and cultures, providing insight into how humans react to environments. Both subjects are important for education as they allow deeper understanding of people, societies, and how things change over time. Several institutions play key roles in socializing individuals, including the family, peer groups, mass media, schools, and churches, each influencing values and behavior in different ways.
The document discusses different types of learning activities including absorb, do, and connect activities. Absorb activities involve acquiring knowledge passively, such as through readings, presentations, or field trips. Do activities require active participation, such as practice activities, games, simulations, and discovery activities. Connect activities help students relate what they learn to real life experiences through activities like asynchronous discussions, original work, research, and job aids. The ideal learning approach incorporates all three types of activities.
Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) are defined as semi structured group discussions, used to obtain in-depth information (qualitative data - insight) from a group of people about a particular topic.
The focus group discussion yields information about people’s opinions, beliefs, attitudes, and perceptions towards a product, service, concept, advertisement, idea, or packaging.
Collaborative action research is a process where educators systematically examine their own practices using research techniques to improve student learning. It involves teams of practitioners working together to investigate issues relevant to them. There are typically five phases: (1) identifying problems, (2) planning actions, (3) collecting data, (4) analyzing data, and (5) planning for future actions based on results. Collaborative action research is advocated for because it allows educators without research expertise to improve, and collaboration facilitates discussion of issues and perspectives.
This document discusses curriculum change and evaluation. It defines curriculum change as efforts to change aims, objectives, and content according to values, culture and resources. Factors influencing change include individuals, financial pressures, staffing issues, student abilities, and regulations. The phases of change include planning, implementation, and evaluation. Curriculum evaluation is done at the formative and summative levels to improve instruction and assess effectiveness in meeting objectives. Various stakeholders play important roles in the change and evaluation process.
The document discusses the deductive and inductive methods of teaching. The deductive method involves presenting students with general rules and principles and then providing examples to verify them. The inductive method starts with specific examples and observations from which students derive generalizations and principles.
Some key points made in the document include:
- The deductive method simplifies the teacher's work but students may not properly assimilate knowledge that is simply presented to them.
- The inductive method promotes more active learning as students discover truths for themselves, but it is a slower process.
- Both methods have merits and demerits depending on the topic, age of students, and learning objectives.
This document discusses action research and teacher professional development. It explains that action research involves teachers critically reflecting on their own practice to improve student outcomes. This can be done individually or collaboratively through projects focused on an area of interest. The document provides examples of action research questions and outlines the process of developing a project including collecting and analyzing data. It notes benefits like improved teaching and confidence but also challenges like time required. Advice for schools includes supporting teachers by modeling projects and having structures in place to share learning.
The document is a request from a teacher to observe a class as part of a course requirement. It includes a sample classroom observation checklist that will be used to evaluate different teaching strategies, media used, and student learning styles. The teacher is asking the recipient for permission to observe one of their classes, and includes space to indicate a preferred date, time, classroom, and subject for the observation.
THE ROLES OF STAKEHOLDERS IN CURRICULUM IMPLEMENTATIONJhenq Campo
The document discusses stakeholders in curriculum development and implementation. It identifies three main stakeholder groups: 1) Learners, who are at the center of curriculum design and directly influenced by it; 2) Teachers, who develop, plan, and implement curriculum to meet learners' needs and interests; and 3) Curriculum managers and administrators, who oversee implementation, select teachers, procure resources, and ensure smooth transitions for learners across grade levels. Quotes from sources emphasize placing learners' needs at the center, organizing curriculum to meet individual differences, and the responsibilities of teachers and administrators in shaping and operationalizing the curriculum.
The document discusses the foundations that influence curriculum development, including philosophical, psychological, sociological, economic, and historical foundations. It focuses on the sociological foundation, noting that societal structures, culture transmission, social problems, and economic issues need to be considered in curriculum making. Schools exist within the social context of society rather than apart from it, and the society influences the type of curriculum through its economic and political systems over time, shifting curriculums from basic skills and apprenticeships in agrarian societies to a factory model with compartments and direct teaching in industrial societies.
Progressivism is an educational philosophy founded on pragmatism that focuses on real-world problem solving and individual development. It views learning as an active, democratic, and social process where students construct knowledge by experimenting and solving problems. Key figures like John Dewey and Jerome Bruner argued that subjects can be taught to any student through discovery learning and interest in the material rather than external motivation. The principles of educational progressivism emphasize problem-based learning to develop skills, learning through real activities with others, and providing students with skills and knowledge to succeed.
Services of the Guidance Office:
1. Individual Inventory
2. Information
3. Counseling
4. Assessment and Appraisal
5. Referral
6. Follow-up
7. Consultation
8. Research and Evaluation
9. Prevention and Wellness
This document discusses two ways that technology can be used in learning: traditionally and constructively. Traditionally, technology serves as a teacher delivering instructional lessons to learners. Constructively, technology helps learners build their own understanding by serving as a partner during the learning process, allowing learners to gather, analyze, and make meaning from the information presented. The document provides examples of traditional tech uses like film showings and examples of constructive uses like hands-on computer activities.
Chapter one of Decentralized Educational Management CourseMuhammed Kedir Hiko
This document outlines a course on decentralized educational management. It discusses key concepts of decentralization including definitions, the difference between centralization and decentralization, rationales for decentralization, and dimensions of decentralization. The course contains 3 chapters that cover basic concepts of decentralization, educational decentralization, and case studies of educational decentralization in Ethiopia.
School administration and supervision must be scientific, based on accepted educational philosophy, and creative. It must also be evaluated based on its results. To be effective, administration and supervision must emphasize using facts and scientific principles to discover solutions. It should also be guided by and integrate educational philosophies, like Dewey's view that education is life and growth. Administration encourages growth by providing opportunities for teachers and pupils to develop their talents. The effectiveness of administration can be determined by evaluating the outcomes and whether it promotes pupil and societal growth. Clear definition of duties is also important to avoid conflicts between administrators at different levels.
The document discusses several challenges and issues regarding developing global competency in education. It argues that the most important priority is to clearly define what global competency means. Secondly, it stresses the importance of providing teachers training in how to teach from a global perspective in order to best prepare students. Using curriculum that incorporates a global perspective and real-world examples is also highlighted as a key factor. The document notes trends showing U.S. students lagging behind international peers in math and science and argues this puts Americans at a disadvantage in the global economy. It maintains that teaching students multiple languages would enhance their ability to engage in a global society.
Common behavioral problems in schools include talking out of turn, daydreaming, and playing with personal items. These behaviors disrupt teaching and learning. Teachers in one Philippine school reported nonattentiveness, talking out of turn, and overactivity as the most frequent problems. Guidance intervention and parental involvement are used to address issues. The document recommends listening to students, using open-ended questions, focusing on teaching proper behaviors, and following up to reinforce skills. Existing literature finds talking out of turn is a common issue cross-culturally and disruptive behaviors negatively impact academic achievement.
This annotated bibliography summarizes research on effective strategies for teaching elementary mathematics through technology. The author reviewed articles describing various technology tools that have been successfully used to enhance mathematics learning, such as Graph Club software, student response systems, and hands-on engineering programs. Two articles provided frameworks to help teachers select appropriate technologies based on their pedagogical and content goals. While the bibliography revealed many promising tools and strategies, the author notes that continued research is still needed due to the rapidly evolving nature of educational technology.
The survey found that:
- Most teachers (92%) use technology such as projectors and laptops in the classroom.
- The majority of students (84%) feel their academic performance benefits from their teachers' use of technology.
- While 53% of students prefer the sole use of technology, 39% like a combination of traditional and technology-based teaching methods.
This document provides an overview of action research in education. It defines action research as a systematic inquiry conducted by educators to gather information and improve their own educational practices and student learning. The document discusses key characteristics of action research such as having a practical focus on the educator's own practices, involving collaboration, following a dynamic and cyclical process, developing a plan of action, and sharing research findings. It also outlines common steps to conducting action research and lists different techniques for collecting data, such as observation, questioning, and examining records.
This document outlines the steps for conducting research using a systems analysis approach. It discusses systems analysis as a method for examining educational systems as interrelated parts within a larger socio-economic environment. The 4 main steps are: 1) Identify the goals of the educational program, 2) Gather data on subsystems and their interrelationships, 3) Construct an instrument to evaluate student outcomes, and 4) Analyze and interpret the data on inputs, processes, and outputs against the program goals. Conducting research using this systems approach allows for analyzing specific problems or an entire school system.
Sociology and anthropology are relevant to education. Sociology is the scientific study of human society and interactions, helping teachers understand students' backgrounds. Anthropology is the study of humans and cultures, providing insight into how humans react to environments. Both subjects are important for education as they allow deeper understanding of people, societies, and how things change over time. Several institutions play key roles in socializing individuals, including the family, peer groups, mass media, schools, and churches, each influencing values and behavior in different ways.
The document discusses different types of learning activities including absorb, do, and connect activities. Absorb activities involve acquiring knowledge passively, such as through readings, presentations, or field trips. Do activities require active participation, such as practice activities, games, simulations, and discovery activities. Connect activities help students relate what they learn to real life experiences through activities like asynchronous discussions, original work, research, and job aids. The ideal learning approach incorporates all three types of activities.
Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) are defined as semi structured group discussions, used to obtain in-depth information (qualitative data - insight) from a group of people about a particular topic.
The focus group discussion yields information about people’s opinions, beliefs, attitudes, and perceptions towards a product, service, concept, advertisement, idea, or packaging.
Collaborative action research is a process where educators systematically examine their own practices using research techniques to improve student learning. It involves teams of practitioners working together to investigate issues relevant to them. There are typically five phases: (1) identifying problems, (2) planning actions, (3) collecting data, (4) analyzing data, and (5) planning for future actions based on results. Collaborative action research is advocated for because it allows educators without research expertise to improve, and collaboration facilitates discussion of issues and perspectives.
This document discusses curriculum change and evaluation. It defines curriculum change as efforts to change aims, objectives, and content according to values, culture and resources. Factors influencing change include individuals, financial pressures, staffing issues, student abilities, and regulations. The phases of change include planning, implementation, and evaluation. Curriculum evaluation is done at the formative and summative levels to improve instruction and assess effectiveness in meeting objectives. Various stakeholders play important roles in the change and evaluation process.
The document discusses the deductive and inductive methods of teaching. The deductive method involves presenting students with general rules and principles and then providing examples to verify them. The inductive method starts with specific examples and observations from which students derive generalizations and principles.
Some key points made in the document include:
- The deductive method simplifies the teacher's work but students may not properly assimilate knowledge that is simply presented to them.
- The inductive method promotes more active learning as students discover truths for themselves, but it is a slower process.
- Both methods have merits and demerits depending on the topic, age of students, and learning objectives.
This document discusses action research and teacher professional development. It explains that action research involves teachers critically reflecting on their own practice to improve student outcomes. This can be done individually or collaboratively through projects focused on an area of interest. The document provides examples of action research questions and outlines the process of developing a project including collecting and analyzing data. It notes benefits like improved teaching and confidence but also challenges like time required. Advice for schools includes supporting teachers by modeling projects and having structures in place to share learning.
The document is a request from a teacher to observe a class as part of a course requirement. It includes a sample classroom observation checklist that will be used to evaluate different teaching strategies, media used, and student learning styles. The teacher is asking the recipient for permission to observe one of their classes, and includes space to indicate a preferred date, time, classroom, and subject for the observation.
THE ROLES OF STAKEHOLDERS IN CURRICULUM IMPLEMENTATIONJhenq Campo
The document discusses stakeholders in curriculum development and implementation. It identifies three main stakeholder groups: 1) Learners, who are at the center of curriculum design and directly influenced by it; 2) Teachers, who develop, plan, and implement curriculum to meet learners' needs and interests; and 3) Curriculum managers and administrators, who oversee implementation, select teachers, procure resources, and ensure smooth transitions for learners across grade levels. Quotes from sources emphasize placing learners' needs at the center, organizing curriculum to meet individual differences, and the responsibilities of teachers and administrators in shaping and operationalizing the curriculum.
The document discusses the foundations that influence curriculum development, including philosophical, psychological, sociological, economic, and historical foundations. It focuses on the sociological foundation, noting that societal structures, culture transmission, social problems, and economic issues need to be considered in curriculum making. Schools exist within the social context of society rather than apart from it, and the society influences the type of curriculum through its economic and political systems over time, shifting curriculums from basic skills and apprenticeships in agrarian societies to a factory model with compartments and direct teaching in industrial societies.
Progressivism is an educational philosophy founded on pragmatism that focuses on real-world problem solving and individual development. It views learning as an active, democratic, and social process where students construct knowledge by experimenting and solving problems. Key figures like John Dewey and Jerome Bruner argued that subjects can be taught to any student through discovery learning and interest in the material rather than external motivation. The principles of educational progressivism emphasize problem-based learning to develop skills, learning through real activities with others, and providing students with skills and knowledge to succeed.
Services of the Guidance Office:
1. Individual Inventory
2. Information
3. Counseling
4. Assessment and Appraisal
5. Referral
6. Follow-up
7. Consultation
8. Research and Evaluation
9. Prevention and Wellness
This document discusses two ways that technology can be used in learning: traditionally and constructively. Traditionally, technology serves as a teacher delivering instructional lessons to learners. Constructively, technology helps learners build their own understanding by serving as a partner during the learning process, allowing learners to gather, analyze, and make meaning from the information presented. The document provides examples of traditional tech uses like film showings and examples of constructive uses like hands-on computer activities.
Chapter one of Decentralized Educational Management CourseMuhammed Kedir Hiko
This document outlines a course on decentralized educational management. It discusses key concepts of decentralization including definitions, the difference between centralization and decentralization, rationales for decentralization, and dimensions of decentralization. The course contains 3 chapters that cover basic concepts of decentralization, educational decentralization, and case studies of educational decentralization in Ethiopia.
School administration and supervision must be scientific, based on accepted educational philosophy, and creative. It must also be evaluated based on its results. To be effective, administration and supervision must emphasize using facts and scientific principles to discover solutions. It should also be guided by and integrate educational philosophies, like Dewey's view that education is life and growth. Administration encourages growth by providing opportunities for teachers and pupils to develop their talents. The effectiveness of administration can be determined by evaluating the outcomes and whether it promotes pupil and societal growth. Clear definition of duties is also important to avoid conflicts between administrators at different levels.
The document discusses several challenges and issues regarding developing global competency in education. It argues that the most important priority is to clearly define what global competency means. Secondly, it stresses the importance of providing teachers training in how to teach from a global perspective in order to best prepare students. Using curriculum that incorporates a global perspective and real-world examples is also highlighted as a key factor. The document notes trends showing U.S. students lagging behind international peers in math and science and argues this puts Americans at a disadvantage in the global economy. It maintains that teaching students multiple languages would enhance their ability to engage in a global society.
Common behavioral problems in schools include talking out of turn, daydreaming, and playing with personal items. These behaviors disrupt teaching and learning. Teachers in one Philippine school reported nonattentiveness, talking out of turn, and overactivity as the most frequent problems. Guidance intervention and parental involvement are used to address issues. The document recommends listening to students, using open-ended questions, focusing on teaching proper behaviors, and following up to reinforce skills. Existing literature finds talking out of turn is a common issue cross-culturally and disruptive behaviors negatively impact academic achievement.
This annotated bibliography summarizes research on effective strategies for teaching elementary mathematics through technology. The author reviewed articles describing various technology tools that have been successfully used to enhance mathematics learning, such as Graph Club software, student response systems, and hands-on engineering programs. Two articles provided frameworks to help teachers select appropriate technologies based on their pedagogical and content goals. While the bibliography revealed many promising tools and strategies, the author notes that continued research is still needed due to the rapidly evolving nature of educational technology.
The survey found that:
- Most teachers (92%) use technology such as projectors and laptops in the classroom.
- The majority of students (84%) feel their academic performance benefits from their teachers' use of technology.
- While 53% of students prefer the sole use of technology, 39% like a combination of traditional and technology-based teaching methods.
This document is meant to be used as a guide to current and upcoming students at the CXC CSEC level experiencing difficulty in doing their School Bases Assesment (SBA). This document follows the 2010 syllabus which may be subject to change.
AN EXPLORATORY STUDY ON K-12 TEACHERS USE OF TECHNOLOGY AND.docxdaniahendric
AN EXPLORATORY STUDY ON K-12 TEACHERS'
USE OF TECHNOLOGY AND MULTIMEDIA IN THE CLASSROOM
INTRODUCTION
Teachers
positively support their curricular goals and enhance
classroom instruction (Smerdon, B., Cronen, S., Lanahan, L.,
Anderson, J., Lannotti, N., & Angeles, J. (2000); Gray,
Thomas & Lewis, 2010). There are multiple technology tools
st
in the 21 century available for teachers to integrate in their
classroom for these purposes; however, there are
challenges. These tools change rapidly so it becomes
inherent for schools to have current technology and
teachers that are sufficiently prepared to use these
technology tools (Hinostroza, 2011). Often teachers do not
understand terminology necessary to communicate when
using these tools. Two terms educators commonly use
interchangeably are technology and multimedia. The term
“technology” denotes the hardware that is used in the
classroom and the term “multimedia”conveys software
applications combining digital media types, such as text,
images, sound, and video, which are the definitions used in
this study. Furthermore, it is difficult to establish a skill and
integrate technology in their classroom to
By
knowledge level necessary for educators.
The International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE)
developed five standards in evaluating the necessary skills
and knowledge of educators. These five standards are to:
1) Facilitate and inspire student learning and creativity; 2)
Design and develop digital age learning experiences and
assessments; 3) Model digital age work and learning; 4)
Promote and model digital citizenship and responsibility;
and 5) Engage in professional growth and leadership (ISTE,
2008).
For the purposes of this study, the ISTE Standard 2: Design
and develop digital age learning experiences and
assessments and ISTE Standard 3: Model digital age work
and learning, were the primary focus. More specifically, two
indicators from standard 2 were examined: a) Design or
adapt relevant learning experiences that incorporate
digital tools and resources to promote student learning and
creativity and b) Develop technology-enriched learning
environments that enable all students to pursue their
individual curiosities and become active participants in
* Associate Professor, Instructional Systems Technology, University of North Carolina Charlotte, USA.
** Assistant Professor, Educational Leadership, University of North Carolina Wilmington, USA.
ABSTRACT
st
21 century has seen new technology and multimedia made available for integration in K-12 classrooms. This exploratory
study examines K-12 teachers' use of technology and multimedia in the classroom in two southern counties in the
Southeastern United States. The purpose of the study was to answer the following five research questions: 1) What
technology do teachers use in the classroom; 2) How often do teachers use technology/multimedia in the ...
The study examined approaches and guidelines for using technology in mathematics teaching. It identified three approaches: 1) teacher educators as primary users, 2) preparing teachers to be primary users, and 3) preparing teachers to have students use technology. The guidelines were to introduce technology in context and address mathematics, take advantage of technology, connect topics, and use multiple representations. The researchers believe these approaches and guidelines provide concrete ways to integrate technology and reflect best practices in mathematics education.
The study examined approaches and guidelines for using technology in mathematics teaching. It identified three approaches: 1) teacher educators as primary users, 2) preparing teachers to be primary users, and 3) preparing teachers to have students use technology. The guidelines were to introduce technology in context and address mathematics, take advantage of technology, connect topics, and use multiple representations. The researchers believe these approaches and guidelines provide concrete ways to integrate technology and reflect best practices in mathematics education.
This is intended to enable all teachers to utilise the newest technological developments in the field of Information and Computer Technology. This can help them derive the maximum out of their teaching endeavours. Students are thus benefitted by better knowledge, with great pleasure and ease. The skill to use the thus gained knowledge also can be developed.
This document discusses the TPACK framework for integrating technology into teaching. It begins by explaining the PCK framework developed by Shulman and the addition of technological knowledge by Koehler and Mishra to create TPACK. TPACK consists of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge, as well as their intersections. The document then discusses applying TPACK to teaching English as a second language and reviews related literature on measuring teachers' TPACK. It proposes using a survey to measure ESL teachers' knowledge and address research questions about the model.
The article discusses using computer simulations as technology-based assessments in driver's education programs. It notes that simulations can provide opportunities for students to practice driving and be assessed without real-world risks. Simulations allow realistic representations of driving and immediate feedback for instructors to evaluate student knowledge and tailor instruction. The use of simulations reduces risks for communities, instructors, and students compared to on-road assessment alone. Therefore, computer simulation technology plays an important role in driver's education programs by enabling safe practice and assessment.
A Survey of Mathematics Education Technology Dissertation Scope and Quality ...Crystal Sanchez
This dissertation survey examined 480 mathematics education technology dissertations from 1968 to 2009. It found that dissertation studies earned an average of 64.4% of possible quality points across all methodologies, higher than comparable journal studies which averaged 47.2%. The dissertation studies focused most on calculators and software, and outcomes related to student achievement and attitudes. However, the quality of theoretical connections, research design descriptions, and validity/reliability reporting in dissertations was inconsistent. Improving these areas could increase dissertation and research quality in this field.
This research is done by the researcher to investigate kinds of ICT used by English lecturers for non-English Study Program students at IAIN Curup and to investigate the roles of ICT for the English lecturer at IAIN Curup. This research used descriptive quantitative Because the questioner's results were evaluated and explained in the explanatory form.The questionnaire used as the instrument to collect the data. Questionnaire about the ICT used by the English lecturers for non-English Study Program students at IAIN Curup and the role of ICT for English Lecturer. Five processes is used to analyze the data from questionnaires in this research. They are (1) data managing of research result, (2) reading/memoing of result, (3) description of result; (4) classifying of research result and (5) interpreting of research result. The result showed that the lecturers always used three types of ICR in teaching English in the classroom, they were the speaker, educational games, and website resources. The reason for them using three types of ICT because it was easy to use and cheap. In using the ICT, the lecturers have a different opinion about About ICT's role in promoting its learning operations. The use of ICT in the teaching and learning system had 7 (seven) roles. It is about the role of ICT in motivating, attracting, and enhancing the success of learners in studying English.
technology of education (instructional technologies) emphasizes on the techniques of teaching and learning derived from the principles, ideas and practices drawn from various fields of knowledge like psychology, sociology, philosophy, management studies, cybernetic, etc. in order to optimize the teaching-learning process so as to accomplish specific learning objectives. However, not everyone involved in the mathematics teaching-learning process recognizes what it is. Technology integration in education has the potential to provide significant benefits such as, promoting active and collaborative learning, increasing student engagement and motivation, enhancing and enriching teaching and learning process as well as learning outcomes (Dinc, 2019). This is particularly true in the context of mathematics teaching, where it provides access to tasks as well as opportunities for learners to engage in mathematical experiences that warrant collaborative questioning, mathematizing, validating, analyzing, refining, and investigating experiences (Yadav & Lachney, 2022).
Running head Research Implementation Plan7October 28In.docxjoellemurphey
Running head: Research Implementation Plan
7
October 28
In 1-2 paragraphs, describe your current research question or thesis statement, and how it is relevant to your educational setting.
My current research question involves motivation of students through technology. I want to know if technology 1) increases the motivation for math students in their desire to learn and 2) if they perform better academically with technology integrated into the curriculum. It seems that the first part of my research will be subjective and the second part objective. In my head they blend together nicely as proof-through-research of the advantages (or not) of utilizing technology in teaching mathematics. I have reasons for wanting to gain data on this. Primarily, I believe that the lives of our 21st century students will be inundated with technology for practical use. No longer will technology be used for social networking or game playing. Instead, I anticipate that the future holds uses for technology in business which we currently cannot imagine. The students in my classroom already think in terms of how to use technology not only for simple research, but also in presentations and demonstrations of their knowledge. I know that even at the kindergarten level, the use of computers is becoming more and more popular since set-up time is immediate, colors and shapes are perfect and educational games can be played by two (for a nice interpersonal approach).
A concern about measuring the improved academic performance is that we are using new world technology up against old school testing. I am going to be looking for situations where technology is being used above and beyond arithmetic answers to see how it is being perceived as assisting in the theory and application of mathematics, rather than just doing the mechanics. I am well aware of the standardized tests that my students will face, and that they are not designed for technology assistance. Perhaps I am looking at the next wave of educational improvement. The pendulum swings slowly in education. Preparing my students for their 21st century lives and at the same time preparing them to pass a standardized test from my 20th century life is the challenge I face in my classroom. Through research (with positive results), I like to think that I will be a step ahead when the day comes and technology is properly insinuated into the math curriculum.
November 1
My topic of research is: Are students better motivated and do they perform better academically when allowed to learn mathematics through the use of technology.
1. Developing and Validating a Reliable TPACK Instrument for Secondary Mathematics Preservice Teachers
J. Zelkowski, J. Gleason, D. C. Cox, & S. Bismarck
Vocabulary:
TPACK - The specialized knowledge that teachers require to effectively integrate technology into teaching practices is currently referred to as technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK)
PSTs’ - preservice teachers’ (P ...
This document contains two literature reviews related to the usage of technology in higher education. The first review examines a study on the adoption of educational technology ten years after strategic goals were set at a Canadian university. It found that while technology has potential to improve teaching, numerous barriers exist. The second review looks at a study on mega-universities and knowledge media strategies. It found that mega-universities are using technology to change systems and support students, representing a third generation of distance education beyond correspondence and multimedia. Both reviews discuss variables, research questions, methods, findings, and perceptions of limitations and strengths.
This document discusses issues in mathematics education and provides potential research problems. It notes that engaging students in the new digital age through innovative teaching approaches and technologies is a critical issue. Specifically, how to appropriately integrate technology into mathematics curriculum and instruction while focusing on pedagogical aspects is challenging but important. A second issue discussed is addressing student diversity in multicultural classrooms, including language and cultural backgrounds, which requires teachers to be conscious of students' socio-cultural contexts. A third potential research problem presented is exploring the role of culture in mathematics and how it has been developed across different cultures worldwide.
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of Humanities and Social Science. IJHSSI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Humanities and Social Science, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online.
The document outlines a research project that will examine using student-generated webpages to improve math revision and development. It will include:
- Researching similar projects and effective revision/learning techniques using sources like blogs, wikis, and peer assessment.
- Designing a student webpage project and assessment rubric for a pilot Year 8 class. Test results will compare this class to a non-participant class.
- Drawing information from sources on the TPACK model, technology-enhanced learning, revision pedagogy, and the impact of peer review/feedback.
- Presenting findings and examples on a project webpage using text, images, links, video and audio. This open format can easily share results.
This study examined the impact of a one-to-one laptop initiative on business and marketing high school teachers over eight years through surveys, observations, and focus groups. The findings showed that while technology access increased, most teachers' instructional practices did not fundamentally change and challenges with professional development, access issues, and classroom management emerged. Exemplary teachers were transitioning to more interactive, collaborative approaches. The need for adequate technology-based professional development was discussed to help teachers better integrate technology into instruction.
This document provides an introduction and overview of the key features of Windows 10. It discusses why Windows 10 is being adopted, what's new in Windows 10 including the Start menu, tiles, search, task view, virtual desktops, and snap enhancements. It also covers personalization settings and common questions about navigating and using Windows 10.
The document discusses technology integration in teaching and learning. It identifies appropriate technologies, incorporating tools in designing learning events, and determining features of web conferencing tools. It discusses why technology integration is essential in the Democracy Certificate Program and lists instructional planning models. Models, tools, and techniques for technology integration are presented, including the SAMR model and universal learning events. Benefits of web conferencing tools are outlined. Factors to consider when selecting a web conferencing tool are provided. Daniel Stanford's Bandwidth Immediacy Matrix for identifying and categorizing tools is also introduced.
This document provides a reading lesson for students learning medial letters. It includes example words and sentences containing the target letters Aa, Ee, Ii, Oo, and Uu. For each letter, example words are given to familiarize students. Students are then presented sentences using those words and asked comprehension questions to check understanding. The document aims to teach letter sounds and build early reading skills through exposure to vocabulary and simple text.
This document summarizes a systematic review of 37 publications from 2014-2017 that address changes in teacher training within the TPACK (Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge) model framework. The review analyzed the publications based on public, topic, main results, and methodology. Most studies focused on basic and higher education, using case studies, quantitative empirical studies, and mixed methods. However, there is a lack of longitudinal studies showing teacher application of TPACK in daily practice.
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit InnovationTechSoup
In this webinar, participants learned how to utilize Generative AI to streamline operations and elevate member engagement. Amazon Web Service experts provided a customer specific use cases and dived into low/no-code tools that are quick and easy to deploy through Amazon Web Service (AWS.)
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...PsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) CurriculumMJDuyan
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐏𝐏 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsKrassimira Luka
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
1. Page
1 of 8
Survey of Preservice Teachers' Knowledge of Teaching and Technology
Denise A. Schmidt, Evrim Baran, and Ann D. Thompson
Center for Technology in Learning and Teaching
Iowa State University
Matthew J. Koehler, Punya Mishra, and Tae Shin
Michigan State University
Usage Terms: Researchers are free to use the TPACK survey, provided they contact Dr. Denise
Schmidt (dschmidt@iastate.edu) with a description of their intended usage (research questions,
population, etc.), and the site locations for their research. The goal is to maintain a database of how
the survey is being used, and keep track of any translations of the survey that exist.
Version 1.1: (updated September 1, 2009). This survey was revised to reflect research results
obtained from its administration during the 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 academic years. This
document provides the latest version of the survey and reports the reliability scores for each TPACK
domain. (This document will be updated as the survey is further developed).
The following papers and presentations highlight the development process of this survey:
Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson A. D., Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P. & Shin, T. (2009-10).
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): The Development and Validation
of an Assessment Instrument for Preservice Teachers. Journal of Research on Technology
in Education, 42(2), 123-149.
Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson A. D., Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P. & Shin, T. (2009). The
Continuing Development, Validation and Implementation of a TPACK Assessment
Instrument for Preservice Teachers. Paper submitted to the 2010 Annual Meeting of the
American Educational Research Association. April 30-May 4, Denver, CO.
Schmidt, D., Baran, E., Thompson, A., Koehler, M.J., Shin, T, & Mishra, P. (2009, April).
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): The Development and Validation
of an Assessment Instrument for Preservice Teachers. Paper presented at the 2009 Annual
Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. April 13-17,San Diego, CA.
Schmidt, D., Baran, E., Thompson, A., Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., & Shin, T. (2009, March).
Examining preservice teachers’ development of technological pedagogical content
knowledge in an introductory instructional technology course. Paper presented at the 2009
International Conference of the Society for the Information and Technology & Teacher
Education. March 2-6, Charleston, SC.
Shin, T., Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P. Schmidt, D., Baran, E., & Thompson, A.,(2009, March).
Changing technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through course
experiences. Paper presented at the 2009 International Conference of the Society for the
Information and Technology & Teacher Education. March 2-6, Charleston, SC.
How do I use the survey? The questions you want are most likely questions 1-46 starting under the header “TK
(Technology Knowledge)”. In the papers cited above, these categories were removed so that participants were not
oriented to the constructs when answering the survey questions. The items were presented in order from 1 through
46, however. The other items are more particular to individual study and teacher education context to better
understand results found on questions 1-46. You are free to use them, or modify them. However, they are not the
core items used to measure the components of TPACK.
How do score the survey. Each item response is scored with a value of 1 assigned to strongly disagree, all the
way to 5 for strongly agree. For each construct the participant’s responses are averaged. For example, the 6
questions under TK (Technology Knowledge) are averaged to produce one TK (Technology Knowledge) Score.
3. Page
3 of 8
Thank you for taking time to complete this questionnaire. Please answer each question to the best of
your knowledge. Your thoughtfulness and candid responses will be greatly appreciated. Your
individual name or identification number will not at any time be associated with your responses. Your
responses will be kept completely confidential and will not influence your course grade.
DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
1. Your ISU e-mail address
2. Gender
a. Female
b. Male
3. Age range
a. 18-22
b. 23-26
c. 27-32
d. 32+
4. Major
a. Early Childhood Education (ECE)
b. Elementary Education (ELED)
c. Other
5. Area of Specialization
a. Art
b. Early Childhood Education Unified with Special Education
c. English and Language Arts
d. Foreign Language
e. Health
f. History
g. Instructional Strategist: Mild/Moderate (K8) Endorsement
h. Mathematics
i. Music
j. Science-Basic
k. Social Studies
l. Speech/Theater
m. Other
6. Year in College
a. Freshman
b. Sophomore
c. Junior
d. Senior
7. Are you completing an educational computing minor?
a. Yes
b. No
8. Are you currently enrolled or have you completed a practicum experience in a PreK-6
classroom?
a. Yes
b. No
9. What semester and year (e.g. Spring 2008) do you plan to take the following? If you are currently enrolled
in or have already taken one of these literacy blocks please list semester and year completed
Literacy Block-I (C I 377, 448, 468A, 468C)
Literacy Block-II (C I 378, 449, 468B, 468D)
Student teaching
4. Page
4 of 8
Technology is a broad concept that can mean a lot of different things. For the purpose of this questionnaire,
technology is referring to digital technology/technologies. That is, the digital tools we use such as computers,
laptops, iPods, handhelds, interactive whiteboards, software programs, etc. Please answer all of the questions
and if you are uncertain of or neutral about your response you may always select "Neither Agree or Disagree"
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neither
Agree or
Disagree
Agree
Strongly
Agree
TK (Technology Knowledge)
1. I know how to solve my own technical
problems.
2. I can learn technology easily.
3. I keep up with important new technologies.
4. I frequently play around the technology.
5. I know about a lot of different technologies.
6. I have the technical skills I need to use
technology.
CK (Content Knowledge)
Mathematics
7. I have sufficient knowledge about
mathematics.
8. I can use a mathematical way of thinking.
9. I have various ways and strategies of
developing my understanding of
mathematics.
Social Studies
10. I have sufficient knowledge about social
studies.
11. I can use a historical way of thinking.
12. I have various ways and strategies of
developing my understanding of social
studies.
Science
13. I have sufficient knowledge about science.
14. I can use a scientific way of thinking.
15. I have various ways and strategies of
developing my understanding of science.
Literacy
16. I have sufficient knowledge about literacy.
17. I can use a literary way of thinking.
18. I have various ways and strategies of
developing my understanding of literacy.
5. Page
5 of 8
PK (Pedagogical Knowledge)
19. I know how to assess student performance
in a classroom.
20. I can adapt my teaching based-upon what
students currently understand or do not
understand.
21. I can adapt my teaching style to different
learners.
22. I can assess student learning in multiple
ways.
23. I can use a wide range of teaching
approaches in a classroom setting.
24. I am familiar with common student
understandings and misconceptions.
25. I know how to organize and maintain
classroom management.
PCK (Pedagogical Content Knowledge)
26. I can select effective teaching approaches to
guide student thinking and learning in
mathematics.
27. I can select effective teaching approaches to
guide student thinking and learning in
literacy.
28. I can select effective teaching approaches to
guide student thinking and learning in
science.
29. I can select effective teaching approaches to
guide student thinking and learning in social
studies.
TCK (Technological Content Knowledge)
30. I know about technologies that I can use for
understanding and doing mathematics.
31. I know about technologies that I can use for
understanding and doing literacy.
32. I know about technologies that I can use for
understanding and doing science.
33. I know about technologies that I can use for
understanding and doing social studies.
6. Page
6 of 8
TPK (Technological Pedagogical Knowledge)
34. I can choose technologies that enhance the
teaching approaches for a lesson.
35. I can choose technologies that enhance
students' learning for a lesson.
36. My teacher education program has caused
me to think more deeply about how
technology could influence the teaching
approaches I use in my classroom.
37. I am thinking critically about how to use
technology in my classroom.
38. I can adapt the use of the technologies that I
am learning about to different teaching
activities.
39. I can select technologies to use in my
classroom that enhance what I teach, how I
teach and what students learn.
40. I can use strategies that combine content,
technologies and teaching approaches that I
learned about in my coursework in my
classroom.
41. I can provide leadership in helping others to
coordinate the use of content, technologies
and teaching approaches at my school
and/or district.
42. I can choose technologies that enhance the
content for a lesson.
TPACK (Technology Pedagogy and Content
Knowledge)
43. I can teach lessons that appropriately
combine mathematics, technologies and
teaching approaches.
44. I can teach lessons that appropriately
combine literacy, technologies and teaching
approaches.
45. I can teach lessons that appropriately
combine science, technologies and teaching
approaches.
46. I can teach lessons that appropriately
combine social studies, technologies and
teaching approaches.
7. Page
7 of 8
25% or
less
26% - 50% 51% - 75% 76%-100%
Models of TPCK
55. In general, approximately what percentage of
your teacher education professors have
provided an effective model of combining
content, technologies and teaching
approaches in their teaching?
56. In general, approximately what percentage of
your professors outside of teacher education
have provided an effective model of
combining content, technologies and
teaching approaches in their teaching?
57. In general, approximately what percentage of
the PreK-6 cooperating teachers have
provided an effective model of combining
content, technologies and teaching
approaches in their teaching?
Models of TPACK (Faculty, PreK-6 teachers)
47. My mathematics education professors
appropriately model combining content,
technologies and teaching approaches in
their teaching.
48. My literacy education professors
appropriately model combining content,
technologies and teaching approaches in
their teaching.
49. My science education professors
appropriately model combining content,
technologies and teaching approaches in
their teaching.
50. My social studies education professors
appropriately model combining content,
technologies and teaching approaches in
their teaching.
51. My instructional technology professors
appropriately model combining content,
technologies and teaching approaches in
their teaching.
52. My educational foundation professors
appropriately model combining content,
technologies and teaching approaches in
their teaching.
53. My professors outside of education
appropriately model combining content,
technologies and teaching approaches in
their teaching.
54. My PreK-6 cooperating teachers
appropriately model combining content,
technologies and teaching approaches in
their teaching.
8. Page
8 of 8
Please complete this section by writing your responses in the boxes.
73. Describe a specific episode where an ISU professor or instructor effectively demonstrated or
modeled combining content, technologies and teaching approaches in a classroom lesson. Please
include in your description what content was being taught, what technology was used, and what
teaching approach(es) was implemented.
74. Describe a specific episode where one of your PreK-6 cooperating teachers effectively
demonstrated or modeled combining content, technologies and teaching approaches in a classroom
lesson. Please include in your description what content was being taught, what technology was
used, and what teaching approach(es) was implemented. If you have not observed a teacher
modeling this, please indicate that you have not.
75. Describe a specific episode where you effectively demonstrated or modeled combining content,
technologies and teaching approaches in a classroom lesson. Please include in your description
what content you taught, what technology you used, and what teaching approach(es) you
implemented. If you have not had the opportunity to teach a lesson, please indicate that you have
not.