This assignment is designed to help you analyze civil liberties and .docx

•Download as DOCX, PDF•

0 likes•0 views

This assignment is designed to help you analyze civil liberties and the role of the U.S. Supreme Court in upholding them. Visit the American Civil Liberties Union Supreme Court Cases website to see civil liberties cases that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on, organized by term. Select one of the cases on civil liberties that interests you. Provide an analysis that addresses the following:The civil liberty that is addressed in the case, including the text of the amendment from the Bill of Rights An explanation of the Supreme Court's involvement, including the following: The importance of the ruling (why it is significant)How the case moved through the lower courts to eventually be heard by the Supreme CourtThe powers granted to the Supreme Court by the constitution that allowed them to rule on the case Format your assignment as one of the following:18- to 20-slide visual presentation with detailed speaker note s ...

Education

Similar to This assignment is designed to help you analyze civil liberties and .docx

Identify and briefly discuss TWO specific ways in which presidential.docx

4934bk

Part 1: The Bill of Rights: Explain why the Anti-federalists pushed for the Bill of Rights to be included in the US Constitution. What reasons did they cite as necessary in response to the desire of Federalists to create a strong central government? Next, explain some of the civil liberties that were included and established individual freedoms for Americans. This website may be helpful: Bill of Rights of the United State of America (1791) Finally, explain how the Supreme Court has expanded civil liberties in the U.S. since the creation of the Bill of Rights. Include in your discussion the role of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. Explain the balance of power between the individual and the government as interpreted by the Supreme Court and illustrated in the cases within your textbook. Please refer to at least 3 cases. (For example; Gideon vs Wainright, Miranda v Arizona, Lemon v Kurtzman, Engel vs Vitale, Texas vs Johnson, Griswold v Connecticut and Roe v Wade.) Part 2: Analyze these civil liberties in two important areas of controversy today. First, as it pertains to national security, analyze the pros and cons of expanding government surveillance and give me your verdict on whether we should decrease civil liberties in the name of national security. Next, when it comes to freedom of speech, do you believe the free speech clause of the US Constitution grants corporations the right to unlimited campaign contributions to politicians? Analyze the pros and cons. Your essay should be between 500 and 600 words, double-spaced and in APA format, with parenthetical citations and a Reference List. A cover page is not necessary. .

Part 1 The Bill of RightsExplain why the Anti-federalists p.docx

ssuser562afc1

Over the course of the term, this course has focused on the concepts of Individual Rights as protected under the Bill of Rights, as well as the role of the legal systems and its unrelenting pursuit of Social Order. Each concept balances the other to ensure that rules, institutions, and public initiatives can be executed in a standardized and judicious manner for the benefit of a civilized society. Review the following in preparation to follow a systematic approach to your synthesis of law and fact: Champion, D. J., Hartley, R. D., & Rabe, G.A. (2012). Chapter 1 Law: The Legal Battlefield. In Criminal courts: Structure, process, and issues (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. Write a ten to fifteen (10-15) page paper in which you: Explain the difference in individual rights and social order, and examine the major effects of both on the legal system overall. Choose one (1) of the social controls discussed within Chapter 1, and give your opinion as to the amendment which offers the most protection of the social control that you selected. Address whether the chosen Amendment is simply an instrument of protection to ensure that the rights and liberties of citizens are secure, whether it provides a framework to facilitate citizen / governmental interactions, or both. Explain the answer. Discuss the essentials ways in which the law effectuates social change in American society through judicial activism. Provide a rationale for the response. Examine the overall importance of both substantive law and procedural law. Suggest three (3) ways in which these two (2) types of laws can protect both individual rights and social order. Discuss the invaluable aspects of substantive and procedural in keeping the adversarial system in balance while protecting individual rights and social order. Justify the response. Analyze the key differences between criminal law, civil law, and administrative law. Discuss the role of each when criminal and administrative law or civil and administrative law intersects in the litigation process.Propose two (2) ways in which these three (3) types of laws protect individual rights and social order. Justify the response. Review the three (3) functions of law. Explain the essential manner in which the law overall ensures the existence of adequate order, provides resolutions to conflicts, and protects civil liberties (e.g., freedom of thought, belief, expression, and assembly; protection against unreasonable searches and seizures; and provisions for a court hearing prior to government taking of property) as set forth in the U.S. Constitution. Debate whether or not social control(s), as a function of law, play a fundamentally positive/creative role or negative / restrictive role in the development of modern American law. Provide a rationale for the response. Use at least two (2) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not quality as academic resources. Your assignment must follow these.

Over the course of the term, this course has focused on the concepts.docx

karlacauq0

Statutory Law Research (Federal)

Dittakavi Rao

Term Paper: Individual Rights and Social Order Due Week 10 and worth 200 points Over the course of the term, this course has focused on the concepts of Individual Rights as protected under the Bill of Rights, as well as the role of the legal systems and its unrelenting pursuit of Social Order. Each concept balances the other to ensure that rules, institutions, and public initiatives can be executed in a standardized and judicious manner for the benefit of a civilized society. Review the following in preparation to follow a systematic approach to your synthesis of law and fact: Champion, D. J., Hartley, R. D., & Rabe, G.A. (2012). Chapter 1 Law: The Legal Battlefield. In Criminal courts: Structure, process, and issues (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. Write a ten to fifteen (10-15) page paper in which you: Explain the difference in individual rights and social order, and examine the major effects of both on the legal system overall. Choose one (1) of the social controls discussed within Chapter 1, and give your opinion as to the amendment which offers the most protection of the social control that you selected. Address whether the chosen Amendment is simply an instrument of protection to ensure that the rights and liberties of citizens are secure, whether it provides a framework to facilitate citizen / governmental interactions, or both. Explain the answer. Discuss the essentials ways in which the law effectuates social change in American society through judicial activism. Provide a rationale for the response. Examine the overall importance of both substantive law and procedural law. Suggest three (3) ways in which these two (2) types of laws can protect both individual rights and social order. Discuss the invaluable aspects of substantive and procedural in keeping the adversarial system in balance while protecting individual rights and social order. Justify the response. Analyze the key differences between criminal law, civil law, and administrative law. Discuss the role of each when criminal and administrative law or civil and administrative law intersects in the litigation process.Propose two (2) ways in which these three (3) types of laws protect individual rights and social order. Justify the response. Review the three (3) functions of law. Explain the essential manner in which the law overall ensures the existence of adequate order, provides resolutions to conflicts, and protects civil liberties (e.g., freedom of thought, belief, expression, and assembly; protection against unreasonable searches and seizures; and provisions for a court hearing prior to government taking of property) as set forth in the U.S. Constitution. Debate whether or not social control(s), as a function of law, play a fundamentally positive/creative role or negative / restrictive role in the development of modern American law. Provide a rationale for the response. Use at least two (2) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and othe.

Term Paper Individual Rights and Social OrderDue Week 10 and wort.docx

felicitytaft14745

Executive-Legislative Conflicts The powers of the Executive and Legislative branches of government are outlined in the Constitution and there is some degree of overlap, which ultimately leads to conflict between the two branches. For instance, both the president and the Congress have war powers. According to the Constitution, the president is the “…c ommander in chief of the Army, and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of several states…” (Article 2, Section 2). Therefore, the president has the power to wage war. On the other hand, Congress has the power to declare war and controls funding for wars. Several presidents, including Presidents Truman, Johnson, Clinton, and Bush, have waged war without authorization from Congress, and thus have broken the law. When these and other conflicts arise between the executive and legislative branches of government, it is up to the courts to decide how they should be resolved. To do so, judges reference the Constitution and interpret the meaning of specific provisions when coming to a decision. To prepare for this Discussion: Review the Constitution in Appendix E in the course text, Administrative Law and Politics: Cases and Comments. Consider the powers of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Think about how the executive and legislative powers overlap. Review the article, “The Use and Abuse of Power: The Supreme Court and the Separation of Powers.” Pay particular attention to the analyses of the Immigration and Naturalization Service v Chadha and Morrison v Olson cases. Think about the executive-legislative conflicts evident in each case and consider how the Supreme Court resolved the conflicts. Review the article, “The Supreme Court and the Powers of the Executive: The Adjudication of Foreign Policy.” Focus on the role of the Supreme Court in resolving executive-legislative conflicts related to foreign policy. Review the article, “Conflicts between the Commander in Chief and Congress: Concurrent Power over the Conduct of War.” Pay particular attention to how the Supreme Court intervened in executive-legislative conflicts regarding war powers. Using the Walden Library and/or the Internet, research one case discussed in the readings this week, or another of your choosing that involved an executive-legislative conflict. Consider arguments made by the executive and legislative members and/or groups. Think about how the Court came to a decision, noting how the Court justified the decision, using Constitutional provisions. With these thoughts in mind: Post by Day 3 a brief description of the case you selected. Then explain the arguments made by the executive and legislative members and/or groups. Be specific. Finally explain how the Court came to a decision, using specific Constitutional provisions. Again, be specific. Note: Identify the case you selected in the first line of your post. You will be asked to respond to a colleague who selected a case that you did not. Be sur.

Executive-Legislative ConflictsThe powers of the Executive and Leg.docx

rhetttrevannion

Term Paper Individual Rights and Social OrderDue Week 10 and wort.docx

johniemcm5zt

Govt 2305-Ch_12

Rick Fair

Two essays required, original work only. Initial Post: Prepare: Prior to completing this discussion question, review Chapters 9 and 10 in American Government and the following articles: “ How Voter ID Laws Are Being Used to Disenfranchise Minorities and the Poor ,” “ Fraught with Fraud ,” and “ Proof at the Polls .” Reflect: The U.S. has one of the lowest voter turnout rates among modern democratic political systems. One study ranks the U.S. 120th on a list of 169 nations compared on voter turnout (Pintor, Gratschew, & Sullivan, 2002). During the last decade, many initiatives have been undertaken to increase voter participation, yet concerns about the possibility of election fraud have also increased. Additionally, some political interests feel threatened by the increase in turnout among some traditionally low-turnout ethnic minorities. Several states have recently passed legislation imposing new registration and identification requirements. This has sparked debate about whether these are tactics intended to suppress turnout or to prevent fraud. Write: In your initial post, summarize recent developments in several states enacting voter ID laws. Analyze and describe the pros and cons on both sides of the debate about these laws. Is voter fraud a major problem for our democracy or are some groups trying to make it harder for some segments of society to vote? Draw your own conclusion about the debate over voter ID laws. Justify your conclusions with facts and persuasive reasoning. Fully respond to all parts of the question and write your response in your own words. Your initial post must be 200 to 250 words. Support your position with APA citations from two or more of the assigned resources required for this discussion. Please be sure that you demonstrate understanding of these resources, integrate them into your argument, and cite them properly. Second Post: Prepare: Prior to beginning your reflection, review all course readings and videos as required. Reflect: The U.S. national government is based on the framework detailed in the U.S. Constitution. The process that the Founding Fathers used to map out our national government is fascinating and illuminating. The Constitution creates a system of checks and balances and separation of powers that have been focal points for class discussions. In addition, the Constitution identifies three main branches for the national government: the legislative, executive, and judicial, which are tasked, respectively, with the creation of the legislation to guide the country, the implementation and execution of that legislation, and the review of that legislation for constitutionality and legality. Interacting with the federal government includes a variety of different actors and political processes such as the states, political parties, interest groups, and federal elections. All these features create a vibrant and healthy democracy. Write: In your initial post of at least 200 to 250 words, .

Two essays required, original work only.Initial PostPrepare .docx

TakishaPeck109

Please answer the following questions, in your own words. Pretend you are writing for someone who knows something about business but nothing about law. Remember: This is an individual assignment. You may NOT use anyone else’s thoughts or words in answering the questions. Papers will be run through Turnitin. Transgressions of this rule will be treated as honor violations. Remember: Transgressions of this rule will be treated as honor violations. Papers will be analyzed by Turnitin. Your answer to each of the questions should be roughly 1 page, double spaced.:- 12 questions, double space 1. Cite actual language from the U. S. Constitution to demonstrate three different and specific ways in which the Constitution creates “a more perfect market” (though NOT intellectual property, see below). Explain why these clauses do in fact create a better market. 2. Go online and find the 20 least populous states. Add up their populations. What % of the total U S Population do these 20 states account for? What % of the U S Population does the state of California account for? It takes 40 Senators to sustain a “filibuster.” With all this in mind: a) define filibuster, as it is currently used in the U S Senate (you will need to look this up), b) describe how the Senate “2-seat” rule plus the filibuster affects the balance of power between the states, c) identify those industries that you think would be favored by this arrangement d) comment on whether or not the Senate a democratic institution. 3. Please consider the 10th Amendment. Restate it in plain, modern English. How does this amendment comport with the historical fact that the Constitution was “ratified” by the 13 “states”? Do you believe that the 10 th Amendment is still honored by the U. S. Government? Why or why not? 4. Please read the following clause from Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution: To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries; Why is this clause important to the practice of business in the USA? Give examples and be specific. Since this course is about Law, Business, and Society, please explain who wins - and who loses - when the “limited Times” referred to above are extended too long. Cite some examples to illustrate your ideas. 5. Argue pro or con to the following assertion: Due to advances in technology, we the people no longer have “4 th Amendment rights” against unreasonable search and seizure. Use readings and cases from the course to support your position. 6. a) In simple English, describe the process required to amend the U S Constitution. Again, there is that word “ratify.” Why must amendments be ratified? B) In class, we said that one could get a sense of U. S. history by examining a timeline of the Amendments to the Constitution, and their dates of ratification. Choose one “Amendment driven” period in U S Histor.

Please answer the following questions, in your own words. Pretend yo.docx

janekahananbw

IST 309 Team-Project A. Write about laws of Drones. (Like Privacy rights or public concerns)NO TITLE PAGE! B. The main content of my paper is talking about Laws of public concerns, so don’t talking about military or famers or other things! C. You must read these three articles and quote these articles, moreover use these articles as your references. http://www.nationaljournal.com/tech/few-privacy-limitations-exist-on-how-police-use-drones-20150205 http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2015/mar/05/drones-california-police-sacramento-privacy/ http://www.brookings.edu/research/reports2/2014/11/drones-and-aerial-surveillance D. APA format, double space, NO INTRODUTION, NO HISTORY, because it is a team project and I need write a Laws Part on it. Other team member will do introduction and history part. SO, PLEASE just write LAWS of Drones! E. This is the order of my paper. 1. A starting of Laws of Drones. The following is a example, you need to write like that, but you cannot copy it: (As drones become cheaper and more capable, more police departments across the country are asking for and getting federal approval to use them for law enforcement. But the Federal Aviation Administration only takes safety into consideration when it grants a law enforcement agency approval to use drones, leaving privacy protections to legislation—which, depending on the state in question, may or may not exist.) 2. Give a Real Example of Drones. a) How Drones invasion of Privacy? Give a real example of it. Like Drone fly to someone’s backyard without search warrant. b) Talk about a certain law about Drones of privacy protection. c) How public feels about it? How public concerns about it? 3. Talk about two Police Departments have different views: Mesa County and other law enforcement agencies. You need to write down the following content on my paper.(You can get a lot information from first article). a) Mesa County proactive role in drones and publics concerns i. Largent Drone Program in the US ii. 17 pages Policy Manual on Drones b) Other Law Enforcement agencies played a more secretive role in deploying Drones. 4. Bills and Government Regulation. (You can get more information from second article). a) Write Laws SB-142 and AB-56, and list the main points of Drones from these two laws. b) Talk about Government Regulations. 5. The views of Gregory McNeal(You can get more information from third article) a) Give an introduction of Gregory McNeal, like Gregory McNeal who is Professor of Pepperdine University and also is an Expert in Law and Public Policy. b) Talk about Gregory McNeal’s Main Focus: security, technology and crime. c) Write about Five Core Recommendations of Gregory McNeal. d) Give more details or explain Fifth Point of McNeal. It’s following one. (5. Legislators should recognize that technology such as geofencing and auto-redaction, may make aerial surveillance by drones more protective of privacy than human surveillance.) State Court System Chapte ...

IST 309 Team-ProjectA. Write about laws of Drones. (Like Privacy.docx

priestmanmable

In this assignment, you are to write a two-page paper explaining the history, structure, and purpose of the U.S. Constitution. Your paper should address the history and structure of the U.S. Constitution using the list below: Identify events that led to the creation of the document. Explain the need that was felt by the founders used to justify why it was written as it was. Identify the general topics covered in the various sections of the U.S. Constitution. The documents could be described by the processes it created. One of the most celebrated concepts is the rule of law. Explain how the Constitution contributes to that non-violent and orderly transition of power within the democracy. Address which sections focus on the amendment process and the transition of the government. Parts of the documents place very explicit limitations on the power of the government—choose two and explain them with some detail. Identify the branches of the federal government. Explain the role and power of the U.S. Supreme Court. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying APA citations. ...

In this assignment, you are to write a two-page paper explaining the.docx

zenobiakeeney

Assignment 2 Social Structure and Social Interaction (Your name) Introduction to Sociology (Your professor’s name) (Date) Status Set · List 5 statuses that you currently have. · Label each status as either ascribed, achieved, or master. Remember that a master status is not a status that you have mastered. It refers to a status that is so important that it overrides all other statuses. · Status Label (Ascribed, Achieved, or Master) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Roles (Write a paragraph of at least 5 to 7 sentences answering the following questions.) · Choose 1 status from your list. · Describe the role that is associated with the status. · Describe how you learned that role. Role Conflict (Write 1 to 2 paragraphs of at least 5 to 7 sentences each answering the following questions.) · Describe a time when you experienced a conflict because of the demands of two different roles associated with any of your statuses. · How did you resolve the conflict? (Discuss any conversations or social interactions that you had.) · List any active listening skills you used to resolve the conflict. If you didn’t use active listening skills, then list the skills you could have used to resolve the conflict. Chapter 2The Court SystemLEARNING OBJECTIVES After reading this chapter, you should have a thorough understanding of the U.S. court system and how it affects the conduct of businesses and individuals. Specifically, you should be able to answer the following questions: 1. What role does each of the three branches of government play? 2. How do the other two branches of government balance the judiciary? 3. How are the state and federal courts structured? 4. What are the primary differences between trial and appellate courts? 5. How does the Supreme Court do its work? As you now know, laws are meaningless if they are not enforced. Companies have to make a barrage of decisions daily, from product development to marketing to strategies to maintain growth, but most of these are based on sound business acumen rather than legal requirements. If a company does violate a law, however, it must be held accountable. Typically, that accountability comes in the form of a lawsuit heard in court. Whether a suit is brought by a supplier, customer, employee, shareholder, or other stakeholder, litigation is a fact of life for companies. As future business professionals, being familiar with our court system will lay the foundation for your understanding of the litigation process. 2.1 The Third Branch LEARNING OBJECTIVES 1. Understand the constitutional basis for the judicial branch. 2. Explore the differences among the three branches of government. 3. Learn about the chief justice’s role in judicial administration. 4. Explore the concept of judicial review. 5. Become familiar with how the other two branches check and control the judiciary. Under the federal Constitution, power is separated among three branches of government. Article I of the Constitution allocates t ...

Assignment 2 Social Structure and Social Interacti.docx

braycarissa250

Review the following two brief passages from Cornell Law School’s US Constitution Annotated regarding the federal powers of judicial review (judicial review=the ability of federal/national courts to declare federal/national laws enacted by Congress and state laws enacted by state legislatures unconstitutional/in violation of the Federal Constitution): The Establishment of Judicial Review | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute (cornell.edu) (Links to an external site.) Limitations on the Exercise of Judicial Review | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute (cornell.edu) (Links to an external site.) Despite the Constitutional authority vested in federal courts to review the constitutionality of Federal and State laws, the Federal (National) Judiciary (i.e. federal courts) has self-imposed various limitations on its ability to engage in judicial review. Some of these limitations include the following: No Advisory Opinions : Federal Courts don’t hear cases to merely provide their opinion on a matter. There has to be an actual dispute between two or more parties (i.e. there must be a real “case or controversy” for federal courts to review and decide the constitutionality of a law.) Ripeness : Federal Courts don’t typically review cases involving laws that have not yet been enforced or for which a party has not yet suffered harm. A law must become “ripe” in the sense that a party has suffered actual harm or is in immediate threat of harm before Federal Courts will review a law’s constitutionality. Mootness : Similar to the “ripeness” requirement, with some exceptions, Federal Courts will not typically review cases that involve the application of laws that are no longer in effect or the enforcement of which can no longer harm the party in question. Standing : The person/entity who challenges the constitutionality of a law must have “standing” (i.e. a concrete stake in the outcome of a judicial decision). To establish standing, the person/entity must show that they suffered a real injury/harm as a result of the enforcement of the law and that a favorable decision of the Federal Court will provide a remedy for the person/entity in question. Adequate and Independent State Grounds : Federal Courts will review decisions made by state courts only if the decision made by the state court was grounded in a federal legal question (i.e. Constitution or federal law). If the decision was based solely on a State Constitution or state law, then Federal Courts will not review the matter. Abstention : In cases where the claim of unconstitutionality of a state law is already being resolved by state-level institutions, Federal Courts typically abstain from interfering in the resolution of the matter until state-level institutions have completed their processes and made their own determinations. Political Questions : Federal Courts have decided not to review cases involving matters that o ...

Review the following two brief passages from Cornell Law School’s US

josephineboon366

Pol 115 Inspiring Innovation--tutorialrank.com

PrescottLunt1007

Pol 115 Social Responsibility - tutorialrank.com

PrescottLunt1008

Term Paper Individual Rights and Social OrderDue Week 10 and wort.docx

jonghollingberry

The Pros And Cons Of Constitutional Courts

Melissa Luster

Two different discussions, both should be in APA format and 250 words each. Discussion 1 The federal government of the United States was constructed using the directions provided in the U.S. Constitution. Our Founding Fathers had the wisdom and foresight to create a very flexible and intelligently structured government framework that has endured. The entire American political system is based on four constitutionally derived pillars: a national government; separation of powers; federalism; and individual rights. Briefly describe each pillar, how it interacts with the other three pillars, and then provide real-world examples of how each pillar supports our government. How does the U.S. Constitution establish checks and balances and federalism using these pillars? Please explain the reasoning behind your response. Discussion 2 Our judicial branch of government was designed not only to serve as a check on the power of the executive and legislative branches but also to be the final arbiter on disputes among states and between the states and the federal government. One important arbitration tool utilized by the judicial branch is judicial review. Judicial review is one of the U.S. Constitution’s most provocative features as it plays an important role in shaping the laws that impact our society. For this discussion, complete the following: Define judicial review. Explain why the origins and legitimacy of judicial review are often called into question. Discuss whether the framers of the Constitution intended for the judiciary to have this role in the policy making process. Share your opinion on judicial review. Explain why you support or do not support judicial review. .

Two different discussions, both should be in APA format and 250 word.docx

TakishaPeck109

Similar to This assignment is designed to help you analyze civil liberties and .docx (19)

Identify and briefly discuss TWO specific ways in which presidential.docx

Part 1 The Bill of RightsExplain why the Anti-federalists p.docx

Over the course of the term, this course has focused on the concepts.docx

Statutory Law Research (Federal)

Term Paper Individual Rights and Social OrderDue Week 10 and wort.docx

Executive-Legislative ConflictsThe powers of the Executive and Leg.docx

Term Paper Individual Rights and Social OrderDue Week 10 and wort.docx

Govt 2305-Ch_12

Two essays required, original work only.Initial PostPrepare .docx

Please answer the following questions, in your own words. Pretend yo.docx

IST 309 Team-ProjectA. Write about laws of Drones. (Like Privacy.docx

In this assignment, you are to write a two-page paper explaining the.docx

Assignment 2 Social Structure and Social Interacti.docx

Review the following two brief passages from Cornell Law School’s US

Pol 115 Inspiring Innovation--tutorialrank.com

Pol 115 Social Responsibility - tutorialrank.com

Term Paper Individual Rights and Social OrderDue Week 10 and wort.docx

The Pros And Cons Of Constitutional Courts

Two different discussions, both should be in APA format and 250 word.docx

More from dunningblair

Write about one of the photographers from the list below. William Eggleston Diane Arbus Robert Frank Cindy Sherman Duane Michaels Rineke Dijkstra Wolfgang Tillmans Jeff Wall Nikki S. Lee Andreas Gursky Write about your chosen artist answering each of the following bullet-points. Write at least one paragraph for each bullet point. You should copy and paste the bullet points below into a word document and answer them in complete sentence, paragraph form. Please include photographs to accompany your write up and links to the sources you consulted for the write up. Artist’s biographical information and background: date and place of birth, family background, where he/she grew up, what schools he/she attended, what he/she studied, etc. First exhibitions and accomplishments as an artist: How did he/she come to be well-known? Inspirations and influences: What influenced the artist? This is where you can provide historical context for the artist’s work. Examples of work: Most artists have made a large variety of work. Choose 3 of your favorite photographs and tell us why you like them. Explain what series this photograph is part of if it is part of a larger series of work. Copy and paste the photographs you have chosen and include them with the write-up. (Please list the artist, title, and date of the pieces that you include.) (ie: Cindy Sherman is best known for her series "Untitled Film Stills" in which she dresses up restages fictitious scenes from films.) Working style of the artist: Where did the artist go to make these images? (Do they travel? Set up photos in the studio? Take self portraits?) What kind of equipment does he/she use? (A simple camera, flashes?) (ie: William Eggleston is known for photographing the Mississippi Delta region, where he is from. He prefers to walk and roam the streets, looking for ordinary everday objects and subjects. Very rarely does he stage a photograph.) Overarching concept and style of the artist’s work: Tell use more about the themes in the artist’s work. What is he/she known for? What is he/she trying to express or comment upon in the work? Look at reviews of the artist’s work or a review of an exhibition he has been in. Please find reviews from reputable sources (the New York Times , the Washington Post , FindArticles, etc.). (ie: Robert Frank is best known for his series, "The Americans" in which he criss-crossed the United States between 1955 and 1956 trying to capture the true essence of those times, in society, politics, and culture. He is trying to show the human condition and what it meant and looked like to exist during that time in the mid 50s.) What is the artist doing now: exhibitions, artwork, lectures, grants, etc. If the photographer is no longer alive, what was a recent exhibition of their work and what did it show? (Ie: Diane Arbus is no longer alive, however her work continues to be shown throughout the world, a recent solo exhibition of her work was shown at FO.

Write about one of the photographers from the list below.William.docx

This assignment is designed to help you analyze civil liberties and .docx

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to This assignment is designed to help you analyze civil liberties and .docx

Similar to This assignment is designed to help you analyze civil liberties and .docx (19)

More from dunningblair

More from dunningblair (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

This assignment is designed to help you analyze civil liberties and .docx