Theories and Effects of
 Mass Communication

              20082423
              Journalism
              So-mi, KIM
What is What is Mass Communication?
         Mass Communication?
• Mass Communication is “when a source, typicall
  y an organization, employs a technology as a m
  edium to communicate with a large audience“.

• Today, the number and variety of mass communi
  cation theories have steadily increased. More or
  less independent body of knowledge from the so
  cial science and humanities literature, develope
  d by scholars from social sciences (sociology, ps
  ychology) and humanities (philosophy, literary a
  nalysis). Some theories are grand, some are “s
  mall” and specific.
There are 4 major categories in
         Mass Communication Theory:
• Postpositivism : based on empirical observation guided by s
  cientific method, but recognizing the complexity of human be
  havior. Goals: explanation, prediction and control.


• Hermeneutic theory : Study of understanding, especially thr
  ough the systematic interpretation of action or texts. Began
  as the study or interpretation of the Bible and sacred texts. G
  oals: To understand how and why a behavior occurs in the s
  ocial world.
• Critical theory : Theory seeking emancipation and chang
  e in a dominant social order. Starting from the assumption th
  at some aspects of the social world are deeply flawed and in
  need of transformation. Goals: Transformation of the society.


• Normative theory : Theory explaining how a media syste
  m should operate in order to conform to or realize a set of ide
  al social values. Goals: to set an ideal standard against whic
  h the operation of a given media system can be judged. Com
  monly used by theoriests interested in press role in democra
  cy.
Mass Communication Effects :
               How Society and Media Interact
•                              f Media Effects
    With the rise of mass society and the rapid growth of the mass media starting in the nineteen
    th century, the public, media critics, and scholars have raised questions about the effects var
    ious media might have on society and individuals.

•   These effects were viewed initially as being strong, direct, and relatively uniform on the popu
    lation as a whole. After World War I, critics were concerned that media-oriented political cam
    paigns could have powerful, direct effects on voters. This view, though still widespread, was l
    argely discredited by voter studies conducted in the 1940s and 1950s. These studies found t
    hat the voters with the strongest political opinions were those most likely to pay attention to t
    he campaign and hence were least likely to be affected by the campaign.

•   More recently, research has expanded to move beyond looking just at the effects that media
    and media content have on individuals and society to examinations of how living in a world w
    ith all-pervasive media changes the nature of our interactions and culture.
• Understanding the effects of media on individuals and society requires th
   at we examine the messages being sent, the medium transmitting them,
   the owners of the media, and the audience members themselves. The ef
   fects can be cognitive, attitudinal, behavioral, and psychological.
• Media effects can also be examined in terms of a number of theoretical a
   pproaches, including functional analysis, agenda setting, uses and gratifi
   cations, social learning, symbolic interactionism, spiral of silence, media l
   ogic, and cultivation analysis.
• Our understanding of the relationship among politicians, the press, and t
   he public has evolved over the past half-century. Recent studies have su
   pported interactional approaches to understanding campaign effects, incl
   uding the resonance and competitive models.
REFERENCE
• Google (http://www.google.co.kr)
• (http://adityasani.wordpress.com/2012/09/
  18/mass-communication-theory-
  definitions-and-eras/)
• (http://college.cqpress.com/sites/masscom
  m/Home/chapter2.aspx)

Theories and effects of mass communication (20082423 somi, kim)

  • 1.
    Theories and Effectsof Mass Communication 20082423 Journalism So-mi, KIM
  • 2.
    What is Whatis Mass Communication? Mass Communication? • Mass Communication is “when a source, typicall y an organization, employs a technology as a m edium to communicate with a large audience“. • Today, the number and variety of mass communi cation theories have steadily increased. More or less independent body of knowledge from the so cial science and humanities literature, develope d by scholars from social sciences (sociology, ps ychology) and humanities (philosophy, literary a nalysis). Some theories are grand, some are “s mall” and specific.
  • 3.
    There are 4major categories in Mass Communication Theory: • Postpositivism : based on empirical observation guided by s cientific method, but recognizing the complexity of human be havior. Goals: explanation, prediction and control. • Hermeneutic theory : Study of understanding, especially thr ough the systematic interpretation of action or texts. Began as the study or interpretation of the Bible and sacred texts. G oals: To understand how and why a behavior occurs in the s ocial world.
  • 4.
    • Critical theory: Theory seeking emancipation and chang e in a dominant social order. Starting from the assumption th at some aspects of the social world are deeply flawed and in need of transformation. Goals: Transformation of the society. • Normative theory : Theory explaining how a media syste m should operate in order to conform to or realize a set of ide al social values. Goals: to set an ideal standard against whic h the operation of a given media system can be judged. Com monly used by theoriests interested in press role in democra cy.
  • 5.
    Mass Communication Effects: How Society and Media Interact • f Media Effects With the rise of mass society and the rapid growth of the mass media starting in the nineteen th century, the public, media critics, and scholars have raised questions about the effects var ious media might have on society and individuals. • These effects were viewed initially as being strong, direct, and relatively uniform on the popu lation as a whole. After World War I, critics were concerned that media-oriented political cam paigns could have powerful, direct effects on voters. This view, though still widespread, was l argely discredited by voter studies conducted in the 1940s and 1950s. These studies found t hat the voters with the strongest political opinions were those most likely to pay attention to t he campaign and hence were least likely to be affected by the campaign. • More recently, research has expanded to move beyond looking just at the effects that media and media content have on individuals and society to examinations of how living in a world w ith all-pervasive media changes the nature of our interactions and culture.
  • 6.
    • Understanding theeffects of media on individuals and society requires th at we examine the messages being sent, the medium transmitting them, the owners of the media, and the audience members themselves. The ef fects can be cognitive, attitudinal, behavioral, and psychological. • Media effects can also be examined in terms of a number of theoretical a pproaches, including functional analysis, agenda setting, uses and gratifi cations, social learning, symbolic interactionism, spiral of silence, media l ogic, and cultivation analysis. • Our understanding of the relationship among politicians, the press, and t he public has evolved over the past half-century. Recent studies have su pported interactional approaches to understanding campaign effects, incl uding the resonance and competitive models.
  • 7.
    REFERENCE • Google (http://www.google.co.kr) •(http://adityasani.wordpress.com/2012/09/ 18/mass-communication-theory- definitions-and-eras/) • (http://college.cqpress.com/sites/masscom m/Home/chapter2.aspx)