THEORETICAL 
FRAMEWORK
MAIN SCHOOLS AND THEORIES 
• Precursors: 
 The avant-garde 
 Russian formalism 
 Béla Balazs 
 Sergei Eisenstein 
• ‘Précinema theories’: Etienne Fuzellier, Paul Leglise. 
• Claude Magny and the influence of film on literature. 
• Semiological and narratological studies: Christian Metz, 
Umberto Eco, Roland Barthes, Seymour Chatman, 
David Bordwell, François Jost.
THE LANGUAGES OF FILM AND LITERATURE 
• Linguistic definitions: What is Literature? Film Vocabulary 
• The concrete and objective versus the conceptual and 
subjective: Beginnings of The Maltese Falcon and The 
Great Gatsby 
• Diegetic discourse versus mimetic discourse. 
• Point of view 
• Space and time 
• Reception
OTHER DIFFERENCES: EXTRA-LINGUISTIC ASPECTS 
• Individual creation versus collective creation 
• Social (or conventional) limitations 
• Reading as a private act versus film as a show. 
• Other times: a wish to improve the original

Theoretical framework

  • 1.
  • 2.
    MAIN SCHOOLS ANDTHEORIES • Precursors:  The avant-garde  Russian formalism  Béla Balazs  Sergei Eisenstein • ‘Précinema theories’: Etienne Fuzellier, Paul Leglise. • Claude Magny and the influence of film on literature. • Semiological and narratological studies: Christian Metz, Umberto Eco, Roland Barthes, Seymour Chatman, David Bordwell, François Jost.
  • 3.
    THE LANGUAGES OFFILM AND LITERATURE • Linguistic definitions: What is Literature? Film Vocabulary • The concrete and objective versus the conceptual and subjective: Beginnings of The Maltese Falcon and The Great Gatsby • Diegetic discourse versus mimetic discourse. • Point of view • Space and time • Reception
  • 4.
    OTHER DIFFERENCES: EXTRA-LINGUISTICASPECTS • Individual creation versus collective creation • Social (or conventional) limitations • Reading as a private act versus film as a show. • Other times: a wish to improve the original