The document provides a brief overview of the history and administration of the Rorschach inkblot test. It discusses how the test was developed in 1921 by Hermann Rorschach and outlines the basic process of administering and scoring the test. Key aspects include recording verbatim responses, analyzing clusters of psychological features, and using a search order to interpret the full personality profile provided by the test. The document emphasizes that the full value of the Rorschach relies on considering all available data from the test.
TAT Interpretation
Interpretation: There are no formal, normative standards for the TAT.
General
The simplest procedure for studying TAT responses is the inspection technique.
Most clinicians interpret the TAT stories informally; repetitive patterns or themes become apparent by reading through a subject's stories.
It is useful to know the typical themes and stories that are elicited by each of the cards.
Deviations from these may offer rich interpretive value.
Typical themes are presented in Groth-Marnat (2003) Chapter 10, in Bellak (1997) Chapter 4, and in Teglasi, (2001).
It is important to look for corroboration of patterns in other stories, other test results, or in background information.
Bellak (1997) says "A repetitive pattern is the best assurance that one does not deal with an artifact".
In interpretation of the TAT is that the
Pictures are best seen psychologically as a series of social situations and interpersonal relations. Or
All characters in the stories are projected aspects of the self, keeping in mind that they may represent
The ideal self,
The real self,
The feared self, etc.
Murray developed a theory of personality that was organized in terms of
Motives,
Presses, and
Needs.
Murray described needs as a "potentiality or readiness to respond in a certain way under certain given circumstances …. It is a noun which stands for the fact that a certain trend is apt to recur" " (1938).
Theories of personality based on needs(Being Unconscious) and motives suggest that our personalities are a reflection of behaviors controlled by needs.
He assumed that the human natural state is a state of disequilibrium, and that is why people have needs—to satisfy the lack of something.
While some needs are temporary and changing,
Other needs are more deeply seated in our nature.
According to Murray, these psychogenic needs function mostly on the unconscious level but play a major role in our personality.
TAT Interpretation
Interpretation: There are no formal, normative standards for the TAT.
General
The simplest procedure for studying TAT responses is the inspection technique.
Most clinicians interpret the TAT stories informally; repetitive patterns or themes become apparent by reading through a subject's stories.
It is useful to know the typical themes and stories that are elicited by each of the cards.
Deviations from these may offer rich interpretive value.
Typical themes are presented in Groth-Marnat (2003) Chapter 10, in Bellak (1997) Chapter 4, and in Teglasi, (2001).
It is important to look for corroboration of patterns in other stories, other test results, or in background information.
Bellak (1997) says "A repetitive pattern is the best assurance that one does not deal with an artifact".
In interpretation of the TAT is that the
Pictures are best seen psychologically as a series of social situations and interpersonal relations. Or
All characters in the stories are projected aspects of the self, keeping in mind that they may represent
The ideal self,
The real self,
The feared self, etc.
Murray developed a theory of personality that was organized in terms of
Motives,
Presses, and
Needs.
Murray described needs as a "potentiality or readiness to respond in a certain way under certain given circumstances …. It is a noun which stands for the fact that a certain trend is apt to recur" " (1938).
Theories of personality based on needs(Being Unconscious) and motives suggest that our personalities are a reflection of behaviors controlled by needs.
He assumed that the human natural state is a state of disequilibrium, and that is why people have needs—to satisfy the lack of something.
While some needs are temporary and changing,
Other needs are more deeply seated in our nature.
According to Murray, these psychogenic needs function mostly on the unconscious level but play a major role in our personality.
Projective Technique
Take the official Rorschach Ink Blot test to see if you are crazy
video link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76UXSdUVuLk
LIKE and SHARE
Why have the Loyalists largely been forgotten in history Do you .docxalanfhall8953
Why have the Loyalists largely been forgotten in history? Do you believe they acted out of patriotism to Britain or out of self-interest? Explain.
Loyalists can be described as American colonists who were always loyal to the empire of the British, and they believed in the monarchy of the British during the revolutionary war of the Americans. The patriots viewed them to be traitors of their nation. They were also viewed to be the people that prevented America’s liberty (Baker, 1921).
History is often written as a way of appreciating the victors. Often, the losers are not kept in the records. It is what happened to the loyalists. They were simply loyal to the king and the country that they had originated from. Loyalty was a value that every Englishman and colonist had to have. The other colonists were obsessed of having freedom and liberty. However, the loyalists acted on what they thought were right for them to do. For doing the right thing, they were punished, ridiculed, and killed. They have also been forgotten in history since people believed that they were failures and traitors to their country (Evans, 1968).
I tend to believe that the loyalists were patriotic to the British, and that is why they acted that way. However, they had their ideas, and they believed that were doing the right thing. They believed that by staying loyal to the British rule, they were respectful to their country. Their patriotism was a way of being respectful to their mother country. They believed in the monarch system of government while other people believed in democracy. They were opposed to the views of the rebels thus they did not agree to what the rebels wanted to do. They believed that the rebels were traitors to their mother country. The loyalists believed that they were honorable by being patriotic.
References
Baker, W. K. (1921). The loyalists,. London: G. Routledge & Sons [etc.].
Evans, G. N. (1968). The Loyalists. Vancouver: Copp Clark Pub. Co.
W A R H O L C R E D I T H E R E
w w w . s c i a m . c o m SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN 41
PICTURE?PICTURE?
What’s Wrong with This
PSYCHOLOGISTS OFTEN USE THE FAMOUS
RORSCHACH INKBLOT TEST AND RELATED
TOOLS TO ASSESS PERSONALITY AND
MENTAL ILLNESS. BUT RESEARCH SHOWS
THAT INSTRUMENTS ARE FREQUENTLY
INEFFECTIVE FOR THOSE PURPOSES
by Scott O. Lilienfeld, James M. Wood and Howard N. Garb
PHOTOGRAPHS BY JELLE WAGAANER
But how correct would they be? The answer is important
because psychologists frequently apply such “projective” in-
struments (presenting people with ambiguous images, words
or objects) as components of mental assessments, and because
the outcomes can profoundly affect the lives of the respondents.
The tools often serve, for instance, as aids in diagnosing men-
tal illness, in predicting whether convicts are likely to become
violent after being paroled, in assessing the mental stability of
parents engaged in custody battles, and in discerning whether
children have be.
w w w . s c i a m . c o m S C I E N T I F I C A M E R I .docxdickonsondorris
w w w . s c i a m . c o m S C I E N T I F I C A M E R I C A N 81
PICTURE?PICTURE?
What’s Wrong with This
PSYCHOLOGISTS OF TEN USE THE FAMOUS RORSCHACH
INKBLOT TEST AND REL ATED TOOLS TO ASSESS
PERSONALIT Y AND MENTAL ILLNESS. BUT RESEAR CH
SAYS THE INSTRUMENTS ARE FREQUENTLY
INEFFECTIVE FOR THOSE PURPOSES
BY SCOTT O. LILIENFELD, JAMES M. WOOD AND HOWARD N. GARB
PHOTOGRAPHS BY JELLE WAGENAAR
But how correct would they be? The answer is important
because psychologists frequently apply such “projective” in-
struments (presenting people with ambiguous images, words
or objects) as components of mental assessments, and because
the outcomes can profoundly affect the lives of the respondents.
The tools often serve, for instance, as aids in diagnosing men-
tal illness, in predicting whether convicts are likely to become
violent after being paroled, in evaluating the mental stability of
parents engaged in custody battles, and in discerning whether
children have been sexually molested.
We recently reviewed a large body of research into how well
projective methods work, concentrating on three of the most
extensively used and best-studied instruments. Overall our find-
ings are unsettling.
Butterflies or Bison?
T H E F A M O U S R O R S C H A C H inkblot test—which asks people to
describe what they see in a series of 10 inkblots—is by far the
most popular of the projective methods, given to hundreds of
thousands, or perhaps millions, of people every year. The re-
search discussed below refers to the modern, rehabilitated ver-
sion, not to the original construction, introduced in the 1920s
by Swiss psychiatrist Hermann Rorschach.
The initial tool came under severe attack in the 1950s and
1960s, in part because it lacked standardized procedures and
a set of norms (averaged results from the general population).
Standardization is important because seemingly trivial differ-
ences in the way an instrument is administered can affect a
person’s responses to it. Norms provide a reference point for
determining when someone’s responses fall outside an accept-
able range.
In the 1970s John E. Exner, Jr., then at Long Island Uni-
versity, ostensibly corrected those problems in the early Ror-
schach test by introducing what he called the Comprehensive
System. This set of instructions established detailed rules for de-
livering the inkblot exam and for interpreting the responses,
and it provided norms for children and adults.
In spite of the Comprehensive System’s current popularity,
it generally falls short on two crucial criteria that were also
problematic for the original Rorschach: scoring reliability and
validity. A tool possessing scoring reliability yields similar re-
sults regardless of who grades and tabulates the responses. A
valid technique measures what it aims to measure: its results are
consistent with those produced by other trustworthy instru-
ments or are able to predict behavior, or both.
...
Critical Thinking and the Use of Evidence, by Professor Joel HaywardProfessor Joel Hayward
By the end of this lecture you should be able to:
Understand the value of the “Socratic Method”
Understand the role and importance of skepticism
Compare and contrast opinions and arguments
Evaluate the types, strengths and limitations of the evidence available
Compare and contrast the value of primary sources and secondary sources
In this slideshare I briefly review the topic of ergodicity and WEIRDness in Qualitative Research. Disclaimer: Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Builder.ai Founder Sachin Dev Duggal's Strategic Approach to Create an Innova...Ramesh Iyer
In today's fast-changing business world, Companies that adapt and embrace new ideas often need help to keep up with the competition. However, fostering a culture of innovation takes much work. It takes vision, leadership and willingness to take risks in the right proportion. Sachin Dev Duggal, co-founder of Builder.ai, has perfected the art of this balance, creating a company culture where creativity and growth are nurtured at each stage.
Transcript: Selling digital books in 2024: Insights from industry leaders - T...BookNet Canada
The publishing industry has been selling digital audiobooks and ebooks for over a decade and has found its groove. What’s changed? What has stayed the same? Where do we go from here? Join a group of leading sales peers from across the industry for a conversation about the lessons learned since the popularization of digital books, best practices, digital book supply chain management, and more.
Link to video recording: https://bnctechforum.ca/sessions/selling-digital-books-in-2024-insights-from-industry-leaders/
Presented by BookNet Canada on May 28, 2024, with support from the Department of Canadian Heritage.
GraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge GraphGuy Korland
Guy Korland, CEO and Co-founder of FalkorDB, will review two articles on the integration of language models with knowledge graphs.
1. Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08302
2. Microsoft Research's GraphRAG paper and a review paper on various uses of knowledge graphs:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/graphrag-unlocking-llm-discovery-on-narrative-private-data/
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...UiPathCommunity
💥 Speed, accuracy, and scaling – discover the superpowers of GenAI in action with UiPath Document Understanding and Communications Mining™:
See how to accelerate model training and optimize model performance with active learning
Learn about the latest enhancements to out-of-the-box document processing – with little to no training required
Get an exclusive demo of the new family of UiPath LLMs – GenAI models specialized for processing different types of documents and messages
This is a hands-on session specifically designed for automation developers and AI enthusiasts seeking to enhance their knowledge in leveraging the latest intelligent document processing capabilities offered by UiPath.
Speakers:
👨🏫 Andras Palfi, Senior Product Manager, UiPath
👩🏫 Lenka Dulovicova, Product Program Manager, UiPath
Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024Tobias Schneck
As AI technology is pushing into IT I was wondering myself, as an “infrastructure container kubernetes guy”, how get this fancy AI technology get managed from an infrastructure operational view? Is it possible to apply our lovely cloud native principals as well? What benefit’s both technologies could bring to each other?
Let me take this questions and provide you a short journey through existing deployment models and use cases for AI software. On practical examples, we discuss what cloud/on-premise strategy we may need for applying it to our own infrastructure to get it to work from an enterprise perspective. I want to give an overview about infrastructure requirements and technologies, what could be beneficial or limiting your AI use cases in an enterprise environment. An interactive Demo will give you some insides, what approaches I got already working for real.
Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...Jeffrey Haguewood
Sidekick Solutions uses Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apricot) and automation solutions to integrate data for business workflows.
We believe integration and automation are essential to user experience and the promise of efficient work through technology. Automation is the critical ingredient to realizing that full vision. We develop integration products and services for Bonterra Case Management software to support the deployment of automations for a variety of use cases.
This video focuses on the notifications, alerts, and approval requests using Slack for Bonterra Impact Management. The solutions covered in this webinar can also be deployed for Microsoft Teams.
Interested in deploying notification automations for Bonterra Impact Management? Contact us at sales@sidekicksolutionsllc.com to discuss next steps.
Key Trends Shaping the Future of Infrastructure.pdfCheryl Hung
Keynote at DIGIT West Expo, Glasgow on 29 May 2024.
Cheryl Hung, ochery.com
Sr Director, Infrastructure Ecosystem, Arm.
The key trends across hardware, cloud and open-source; exploring how these areas are likely to mature and develop over the short and long-term, and then considering how organisations can position themselves to adapt and thrive.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 4. In this session, we will cover Test Manager overview along with SAP heatmap.
The UiPath Test Manager overview with SAP heatmap webinar offers a concise yet comprehensive exploration of the role of a Test Manager within SAP environments, coupled with the utilization of heatmaps for effective testing strategies.
Participants will gain insights into the responsibilities, challenges, and best practices associated with test management in SAP projects. Additionally, the webinar delves into the significance of heatmaps as a visual aid for identifying testing priorities, areas of risk, and resource allocation within SAP landscapes. Through this session, attendees can expect to enhance their understanding of test management principles while learning practical approaches to optimize testing processes in SAP environments using heatmap visualization techniques
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into SAP testing best practices
2. Heatmap utilization for testing
3. Optimization of testing processes
4. Demo
Topics covered:
Execution from the test manager
Orchestrator execution result
Defect reporting
SAP heatmap example with demo
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Software Delivery At the Speed of AI: Inflectra Invests In AI-Powered QualityInflectra
In this insightful webinar, Inflectra explores how artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming software development and testing. Discover how AI-powered tools are revolutionizing every stage of the software development lifecycle (SDLC), from design and prototyping to testing, deployment, and monitoring.
Learn about:
• The Future of Testing: How AI is shifting testing towards verification, analysis, and higher-level skills, while reducing repetitive tasks.
• Test Automation: How AI-powered test case generation, optimization, and self-healing tests are making testing more efficient and effective.
• Visual Testing: Explore the emerging capabilities of AI in visual testing and how it's set to revolutionize UI verification.
• Inflectra's AI Solutions: See demonstrations of Inflectra's cutting-edge AI tools like the ChatGPT plugin and Azure Open AI platform, designed to streamline your testing process.
Whether you're a developer, tester, or QA professional, this webinar will give you valuable insights into how AI is shaping the future of software delivery.
Connector Corner: Automate dynamic content and events by pushing a buttonDianaGray10
Here is something new! In our next Connector Corner webinar, we will demonstrate how you can use a single workflow to:
Create a campaign using Mailchimp with merge tags/fields
Send an interactive Slack channel message (using buttons)
Have the message received by managers and peers along with a test email for review
But there’s more:
In a second workflow supporting the same use case, you’ll see:
Your campaign sent to target colleagues for approval
If the “Approve” button is clicked, a Jira/Zendesk ticket is created for the marketing design team
But—if the “Reject” button is pushed, colleagues will be alerted via Slack message
Join us to learn more about this new, human-in-the-loop capability, brought to you by Integration Service connectors.
And...
Speakers:
Akshay Agnihotri, Product Manager
Charlie Greenberg, Host
JMeter webinar - integration with InfluxDB and GrafanaRTTS
Watch this recorded webinar about real-time monitoring of application performance. See how to integrate Apache JMeter, the open-source leader in performance testing, with InfluxDB, the open-source time-series database, and Grafana, the open-source analytics and visualization application.
In this webinar, we will review the benefits of leveraging InfluxDB and Grafana when executing load tests and demonstrate how these tools are used to visualize performance metrics.
Length: 30 minutes
Session Overview
-------------------------------------------
During this webinar, we will cover the following topics while demonstrating the integrations of JMeter, InfluxDB and Grafana:
- What out-of-the-box solutions are available for real-time monitoring JMeter tests?
- What are the benefits of integrating InfluxDB and Grafana into the load testing stack?
- Which features are provided by Grafana?
- Demonstration of InfluxDB and Grafana using a practice web application
To view the webinar recording, go to:
https://www.rttsweb.com/jmeter-integration-webinar
Accelerate your Kubernetes clusters with Varnish CachingThijs Feryn
A presentation about the usage and availability of Varnish on Kubernetes. This talk explores the capabilities of Varnish caching and shows how to use the Varnish Helm chart to deploy it to Kubernetes.
This presentation was delivered at K8SUG Singapore. See https://feryn.eu/presentations/accelerate-your-kubernetes-clusters-with-varnish-caching-k8sug-singapore-28-2024 for more details.
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*Frank van Harmelen
Neuro-symbolic (NeSy) AI is on the rise. However, simply machine learning on just any symbolic structure is not sufficient to really harvest the gains of NeSy. These will only be gained when the symbolic structures have an actual semantics. I give an operational definition of semantics as “predictable inference”.
All of this illustrated with link prediction over knowledge graphs, but the argument is general.
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...DanBrown980551
Do you want to learn how to model and simulate an electrical network from scratch in under an hour?
Then welcome to this PowSyBl workshop, hosted by Rte, the French Transmission System Operator (TSO)!
During the webinar, you will discover the PowSyBl ecosystem as well as handle and study an electrical network through an interactive Python notebook.
PowSyBl is an open source project hosted by LF Energy, which offers a comprehensive set of features for electrical grid modelling and simulation. Among other advanced features, PowSyBl provides:
- A fully editable and extendable library for grid component modelling;
- Visualization tools to display your network;
- Grid simulation tools, such as power flows, security analyses (with or without remedial actions) and sensitivity analyses;
The framework is mostly written in Java, with a Python binding so that Python developers can access PowSyBl functionalities as well.
What you will learn during the webinar:
- For beginners: discover PowSyBl's functionalities through a quick general presentation and the notebook, without needing any expert coding skills;
- For advanced developers: master the skills to efficiently apply PowSyBl functionalities to your real-world scenarios.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 3DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 3. In this session, we will cover desktop automation along with UI automation.
Topics covered:
UI automation Introduction,
UI automation Sample
Desktop automation flow
Pradeep Chinnala, Senior Consultant Automation Developer @WonderBotz and UiPath MVP
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Let's dive deeper into the world of ODC! Ricardo Alves (OutSystems) will join us to tell all about the new Data Fabric. After that, Sezen de Bruijn (OutSystems) will get into the details on how to best design a sturdy architecture within ODC.
2. Poetic Prelude: Considerations for Art
• “To proceed beyond the limitations of a given
level of knowledge the researcher, as a rule,
has to break down methodological taboos
which condemn as ‘unscientific’ or ‘illogical’
the very methods or concepts which later on
prove to be basic for the next major progress.”
» Kurt Lewin
3. Poetic Prelude: Considerations for Art
• “The person who does not love to the same degree all things
present in the art of painting will not be a Universalist; It is the
same with the one who does not like landscapes and considers they
merit only a brief and simple study. As the master Boticelli stated,
such a study is useful because just by throwing a sponge soaked
with various colors against a wall to make a stain, one can find a
beautiful landscape. If it is true that in this stain various
inventions can be discerned, or rather what one wants to find in
it, such as battles, reefs, seas, clouds, forests and other similar
things, then surely, this is like the ringing of bells in which one can
understand whatever one wants to. But, even though these
smears of color provide you with inventions, they also show you
that they do not come to represent anything in particular. And
this painter produced very sad landscapes...............”
» Leonardo da Vinci, from “Treatise on Painting”
4. A Very Brief History of The Rorschach
Test
• Early Studies in “Ambiguous Designs” and
Assessments of Individual Personality
• Leonardo da Vinci
• Botticelli
• Justinus Kerner’s book of poetry (1857)
–Poems inspired by accidental inkblots.
5. A Very Brief History of The Rorschach
Test
• 1921: Publication of
“Psychodiagnostik”
– 174 page monograph (183 pages
English trans.)
• Rorschach studied 300 mental patients
and 100 control subjects.
• Rorschach died at age 37, seven months
after its publication. It received little
attention upon publication.
• The work was described as being a
“densely written piece couched in dry,
scientific terminology.”
6. A Very Brief History of The Rorschach
Test
• What’s in a Name?
• Rorschach’s View of his Work
– Rorschach’s Original Title
• “Method and Results of a Perceptual-Diagnostic
Experiment: Interpretation of Arbitrary Forms.”
• “I believe you are being modest…”
• “I have a sense of responsibility for the title…”
7. To Rorschach or Not To Rorschach
• When Should It Be Used?
– Information Collected
• “The Rorschach does not provide data from which answers
to all questions can be derived….” (Exner)
– Limitations
• “…complex specimen of behaviors…can be translated into a
series of descriptive statements concerning the individual.”
(Ibid.)
– Use
• Ordinarily used as part of a battery
• Part of a “multi-method” approach to assessment.
– Scope of the test is wide: “testing everything.”
– Overlapping tests allow the R. to possible provide “crossvalidation” with other tests.
8. To Rorschach or Not To Rorschach
• Who Should Use It?
– The Three Prerequisites (as proposed by Exner)
• Basic Understanding of People and the Notion of
Personality
• Good Working Knowledge of Psychopathology
and Maladjustment
• Understanding of the Test Itself
9. To Rorschach or Not To Rorschach
• The Interreleated Data Sets
– Verbiage
• Language and Responses Given to Examiner
– Sequence
• “As responses have occurred as reflected in both the
substance and the coding of them.”
– Structure
• “Plot of frequencies for nearly 100 variables from which
data for more than 60 variables, ratios, percentages
and indices are derived.”
11. Administering The Rorschach
• Seating
–Seated next to client, never across from
each other.
• Introducing the Test
–“What do you know about this test?”
–“What we are looking for is…”
• “What Might This Be?”
12. Administering The Rorschach
• Time
– “Time should not be afforded undue weight when
administering the test.”
• Recording Responses
– Everything is recorded, verbatim.
– The Rorschach Shorthand
• E: “It cb a very pretty flower”
• S: “Yes, ths cb the stem & here r the petals.”
13. Scoring the Rorschach
• Clusters (Related to Several Psychological
Features)
– Affective Features
– Capacity for Control Stress Tolerance
– Cognitive Mediation
– Ideation
– Information Processing
– Interpersonal Perception
– Self-Perception
– Situation-Related Stress
14. Scoring the Rorschach
• Cluster Search Order
– Changes frequently, often depending upon variables:
• Key Variables
– Presence of a Key Variable predicts which
combination of two or three clusters will yield the
most significant information.
• Tertiary Variables
– Does not have predictive power. Highlights which
cluster will yield the most information but does not
predict which subsequent clusters will supplement.
16. Concluding Remarks
• “The full value of the Rorschach is realized only from the
complete sum of its parts. A neglect of any available
Rorschach data, whether quantitative or qualitative, is an
abuse of the test and a disservice to the client.” (Exner)
• “The most outstanding virtue of the Rorschach method is
generally recognized to lie in its power for providing an
integrated pattern of total personality, and for at once
articulating this pattern in specific quantitative ways into a
manifold of personality dimensions.” (Rickers-Ovisankina)
Editor's Notes
We could easily spend an entire semester studying The Rorschach Test. As you will soon see, The Rorschach Test is profoundly intricate and evocative in its purpose and application. Since we have already discussed various aspects of assessment related to the test – the nature of apperception, the controversy over its use in legal proceedings and the very precise limitations of its administration in clinical settings, I decided to presume we do not need to cover this material a second time. Instead, I wanted to share with you some of the fascinating aspects of the Test – the most vital material. In short, I designed this presentation with the idea that if any of you never again picked up another assessment or book on psychological testing, then what follows is what I want you to know about The Rorschach.
I wanted to begin with a small measure of personal disclosure. The Rorschach was deeply evocative to me – there is something almost alchemic about the transforming of inkblots upon paper into revelation through imagination. It is something I would argue approaches art. To this end, I wanted to share two quotes which I stumbled across in my research – both of which framed my investigation on The Rorschach: its provocative stance as both psychological assessment and instrument of artistic creation. The first considers the argument for its clinical use: “To proceed beyond the limitations of a given level of knowledge the researcher, as a rule, has to break downmethodological taboos which condemn as ‘unscientific’ or ‘illogical’ the very methods or concepts which later on prove to be basic for the next major progress.” – German- American Psychologist Kurt Lewin
The second quote is taken from Leonadoda Vinci’s “Treatise on Painting.” Both da Vinci and Boticelli were interested in the study of “ambiguous designs,” and often cited as the progenitors to contemporary apperception studies. “As the master Boticelli stated, such a study is useful because just by throwing a sponge soaked with various colors against a wall to make a stain, one can find a beautiful landscape. If it is true that in this stain various inventions can be discerned, or rather what one wants to find in it, such as battles, reefs, seas, clouds, forests and other similar things, then surely, this is like the ringing of bells in which one can understand whatever one wants to. But, even though these smears of color provide you with inventions, they also show you that they do not come to represent anything in particular. ”
As we have previously mentioned, both da Vinci and Boticelli were interested in the study of “ambiguous designs,” and often cited as the progenitors to contemporary apperception studies. There accounts of da Vinci imploring his students to study water stains until they could see various images. I tried to find more information about this but all I could find that was directly sourced to da Vinci was the previous quote from his work. In one retrospective of Hermann Rorschach’s life and work, it was suggested that Rorschach was inspired by an book of poetry penned by German doctor JustinusKerner in 1857. The book was said to be comprised of poems – each one inspired by an accidental inkblot. I should add that this idea is speculative and I could not find a great deal of information to bolster or contradict this idea. Pichot, P. (1984). Centenary of the birth of Hermann Rorschach. (S. Rosenzweig & E. Schriber, Trans.). Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 591–596.
According to Maria Rickers-Ovsiankina, Rorschach’s primary interest was “…getting at the nature of the basic modes of functioning, underlying all of an individual’s psychic activity.” After studying 300 mental patients and 100 control subjects, Rorschach sought publishing of his work. Seven months after getting it published, he died at the age of 37. Upon publication, “Psychodiagnostik” received little attention. The work was described as being a “densely written piece couched in dry, scientific terminology.”Later revisions to the original text improved the scoring system, making the scoring more statistically rigorous. The system developed by John E. Exner remains very popular in the United States. This is the system I drew the majority of my material from, although other systems were referenced. In my opinion, the Exner text is the most exhaustive and complete system with multiple considerations for nearly every aspect of the Test.
Considering the controversy surrounding the use of The Rorschach test today, I believe it is important to be reminded of Rorschach’s original view of his own work. Originally, Rorschach proposed the title be “Method and Results of a Perceptual-Diagnostic Experiment: Interpretation of Arbitrary Forms.” Rorschach believed his work had not yielded a test yet – it was incomplete. What he was publishing was a report of findings from his investigation into perception. His colleague and editor, Walter Morgenthaler felt strongly that what Rorschach had written was something far more than an investigation. As Morgenthaler wrote to Rorschach in a letter: “I take this opportunity to include a word about the title of your work. I believe you are being very modest about it. Your subject concerns more than just Perception Diagnostics, much more than that, and all together more than a “mere” experiment.” Morgenthaler then proposed the title of “Psychodiagnostik”Rorschach did not agree – at first – and responded: “It is not just modesty, I have a sense of responsibility for the title. I have brooded a long time about this…but nothing has come forth that has suited me. Expressions such as Psychodiagnostic, Diagnostics of Diseases and Personality, and the like seem to me to go much too far. Perhaps later, when there is a norm created through controlled investigations, such an expression can be used. For now it strikes me as being too pompous.” Rorschach later relented and agreed to the title change, albeit very reluctantly.
Now we consider when it is appropriate or inappropriate to administer the test. The nature of the test and what it is designed to examine is critical. As Exner explains, “The Rorschach does not provide data from which answers to all questions can be derived….the data that unfold from the test represent a complex specimen of behaviors that when scored and studied for its apparent idiosyncrasies, can be translated into a series of descriptive statements concerning the individual.” (Exner)Already we see the nature of the data being collected as well as the limitations of the method will significantly reduce its likelihood of being used. Unlike the majority of the assessments we have considered in this class, the Rorscach has a very complicated construct. Technically, it is looking at personality – however, in the words of Exner, the scope of the test is quite wide: “It’s testing everything.” It is best used as part of a battery with as few as two or three tests, but not uncommonly more than five. These numbers are pulled from studies which suggested the most effective uses of the Rorschach complimenting other assessments. The use of multiple tests allows for overlapping, which makes possible “cross-validation” with other tests.
Now comes the question we ask in here on a nearly daily basis: Who should use this test? Exner proposes three prerequisites to even considering administering the test. The first is a basic understanding of people and the notion of personality. “Rorschach interpretation always proceeds with the objective of developing an understanding of the person as a unique individual…should prompt any interpreter to strive for an integration of findings about characteristics…in a manner that highlights individuality as much as possible.” Secondly, there should be a good working knowledge of psychopathology and maladjustment. “…an appreciation of how characteristics become liabilities, and how various mixtures of liabilities breed forms of internal and/or external maladjustment.” Finally, and most self-explanatory there should be an understanding of the test itself. On that note, let’s get into the administration of the test.
1. Verbiage – Language and responses given to the examiner2. Sequence – As responses have occurred as reflected in both the substance of answers and the coding (or scoring) of them.3. Structure – Plot of frequencies for nearly 100 variables from which data for more than 60 variables, ratios, percentages and indices are derived.
What is interesting about The Rorschach is that in some ways it resembles a strict standardized test in its administration, but in other ways it is completely divergent. Here are some of the noteworthy aspects about the administraton:
Seating and position of one’s self in relation to the responder is critical. The examiner is always seated next to a responder, never across from each other. The reasons for this, in considering the nature of the test, are fairly obvious. First, it reduces accidental ‘cues’ from the examiner to the responder which may influence answers. Secondly, it gives the examiner a much better perspective of the cards, something which is invaluable in collecting visual data. When the test is introduced to the responder, the examiner must always ask for the responder’s knowledge of the test. This becomes a bit tricky in that a properly prepared responder will know only what they need to know in order to yield the greatest data while at the same time not knowing too much information which could skew the results. The introduction of the test to the responder is almost always tailored to accommodate the reason for the testing. In short, the introduction should relate to the reason for the assessment. Lastly, the test begins with the very precisely worded question: “What Might This Be?” This is what begins the entire journey.
“Time should not be afforded undue weight when administering the test.” Already we see a rather large deviation from what we may have come to expect in assessments. Instead of time as a motivating and framing feature, in the Rorschach it is fluid and unimportant. What is most critical is that the responder be given all the time they need in order to provide fully thought out and complete expressions.The resulting responses from the responder are to be recorded verbatim. Every word is critical. As a result, examiners in Rorschach testing become fluent in Rorschach shorthand, a sample of which is seen here. Whole transcripts of sessions read like these here – with abbreviations allowing for more fluid recording.
Now here is the section where I have to reduce how much detail we go into, simply because this section is incredibly intricate and detailed. To give you the most basic overview, data from the responses fall into “clusters.” The first seven clusters relate to basic features of people and are reviewed during the interpretive process. The eighth, situation related stress are reviewed only when there is evidence of situation related stress.
Normally, all of the data collected is “processed” cluster by cluster until it has been exhausted. However, the order in which you proceed through the clusters does change quite frequently. The most frequent cause of this is the presence of key or tertiary variables. Essentially, when these are present you can adapt your cluster order so that you are able to get the best order for review. There are twelve identified Key Variables and when present they allow for combining two of three clusters together to yield the most significant information. The Tertiary Variables have no predictive power – essentially they highlight which clusters have the most information but cannot tell you which proceeding clusters will supplement.
There are ten cards total in The Rorschach Test. They are intended to be presented in order and at no time should the responder be able to see the cards before they are handed to them by the administrator. Here we see three different perspectives of the first card. The top left card is the original image, as it is presented. The lower left card is a breakdown of the areas of the card and the frequency with which those areas are noted by responders. To the right is a scan directly from Exner’s text, which shows the D and Dd areas. The precise areas which responders focus upon is noted using the D for Common and Dd for Unusual responses. The most popular response to this particular card utilizes the entire area of the card and is denoted with a “W” for whole. The response is “bat” or “butterfly.”
Assuming I have not run out of time by this point, I wanted to conclude with a few remarks….in summary, these two quotes provide a good ‘thumbnail’ sketch of what the Rorschach is and what it is intended to provide. “The full value of the Rorschach is realized only from the complete sum of its parts. A neglect of any available Rorschach data, whether quantitative or qualitative, is an abuse of the test and a disservice to the client.” (Exner)“The most outstanding virtue of the Rorschach method is generally recognized to lie in its power for providing an integrated pattern of total personality, and for at once articulating this pattern in specific quantitative ways into a manifold of personality dimensions.” (Rickers-Ovisankina)