The observer effect on the observation results (space = energy=mc2)
•
0 likes•78 views
1) The document discusses the observer effect on observation results and proposes that human mind and thinking can influence matter creation and the geometrical structure of the solar system. 2) It provides several examples of relationships between planetary properties like diameters and orbital distances that seem too coincidental to be pure chance. 3) The author's theory is that the human mind realization process can affect our vision of the solar system, and that the solar system's structure is an interactive process involving both its geometrical components and the human mind.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
Why Jupiter Diameter =142984 km? (part no.3)
This Paper discusses and proves the following hypothesis:
Light Is An Essential Player In The Matter Creation Process
Human mind realization process uses the light velocity
Research Main Conclusion:
The Human Mind Realization Process Uses The Light Velocity
This conclusion is produced by the Following Questions Analysis:
Special Theory Of Relativity Tells Us "If a particle moves by high velocity (Approximately) relative to an observer – the observer will see relativistic effects effected on this particle – (The relativistic effects are Length Contraction - Time Dilation - Mass Increase)
The Questions
1- Are These Relativistic Effects Occurred For The Particle Nature Or For Our Vision Only? (to see something wrong as in the mirage)
2- If these effects are occurred for the Particle Nature – Why the Particle Nature Changes As Result Of The Light Velocity Motion?
3- Is The Particle Nature A Real Nature Or Found Because Of The Observer Effect On This Particle?
This Paper discusses these questions and The Conclusion Proves which are:
1- The Relativistic Effects Analysis
2- A Quantized Experiment
3- The Solar Planet Moves According To A Physical Law (and Not in Chaos)
4- The Moon Angular Diameter
5- The Human Body Contains Electromagnetic Waves
This paper contains 2 points only – Point No.2 (Research Methodology) and Point No. 3 (Research Conclusion Proves)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
A summary of my research part 2- (matter creation discussion)
A Summary Of My Research -Part 2- (Matter Creation Discussion)
Abstract
We complete our discussion in the previous paper
A Summary Of My Research
Paper Hypothesis
Solar Planet Matter is Created Based On The Following Features:
A- Planet Matter Can't Be Created by Any Random process
B- Planet Matter Can't Be Created Independently From Other Planets Matters
(Planet Diameter and Mass supports this claim)
C- There's a direct relationship between planet diameter and orbital distance
The solar group is one body
The document presents a hypothesis that the solar system is one geometrical structure, with each planet playing a role. It provides equations and data showing relationships between planetary diameters, distances, radii, and circumferences that suggest their dimensions were created based on geometrical reasons and as parts of a single system, rather than randomly. The author aims to analyze planetary data to understand how it was determined and prove the solar system is a designed, integrated whole rather than the result of chance processes.
Metonic and saros cycles harmony reason
Metonic and Saros Cycles Harmony proves there's a geometrical structure unifies and connects all solar planets.
This papers tries to answer the following question…
Why Metonic Cycle period 6939.75 days = Saros Cycle Period 6585.4 days + Synodic year 354.39 days?
Jupiter Has A Cycle Of 8 Days (III)
Paper hypothesis:
-Jupiter Cycle of 8 of Jupiter days (=79.2 hours), this Cycle effects on Uranus Orbital Period (30589 solar days)
The hypothesis Explanation:
-Jupiter cycle of 8 days proves that, Uranus orbital period (30589 solar days) can be used as (30589 seconds)!
-That tells us, different rates of time are found in the solar system, and tells also that, several interactions are found between the planets motions which we can't discovered because these interactions are done on different rates of time
-Shortly … Because
-Light motion features are found in the planets motions, Classical Mechanics Science can't help us to discover all interactions found between planets motions, Instead we have to use Relativistic Motions Science to discover these interactions.
Paper Objective:
-The paper discusses the interaction between Jupiter and Uranus Motions which is seen in the dependency of Uranus Orbital Period & Jupiter 8 Days Cycle.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Jupiter Effect On The Inner Planets (VI)
This paper tried to answer the questions:
-Why Jupiter orbital circumference = The Inner Planets Orbital Circumferences Total + Saturn Orbital Distance?
-Why Mercury Day needs 5040 seconds to be =176 solar days?
-Why Mercury Pluto Distance = 5848.2 mkm?
Paper Conclusions
-There's a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/sec in the solar system
-Jupiter Data Shows The Solar System Energy Distribution
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance?
Why Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance?
Best regards
When I have discovered that..
Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance
I have asked Why? But the usual answer was ……
It's Pure coincidence….!
Later I have discovered more equalities….As the following:
1. Saturn Orbital Distance = Mars Orbital Circumference = Pluto Eccentricity distance = Saturn Uranus Distance = 1433.5 million km
2. Mercury Saturn Distance = Neptune Pluto Distance = 1375 million km
3. Saturn Pluto Distance = Mercury Neptune Distance = 4436.5 million km
Then I have asked again… why These Distances Are Equal? Is there a geometrical reason behind?…but the usual answer always be …. " Pure Coincidences"
The question wasn't so simple and the answer was mentioned…. I ask clearly… are the solar planets members in the same body? or parts in the same building?- shortly are the solar group as the human hand and the fingers are similar to the planets? means the planets are created and moving depending on each other because all of them consist one machine –one body –one building – one geometrical structure – means the planets aren't separated from each other– but connected with each other.
(that means the space between the planets is a method to connect each planet with others and not to separate each planet from the others)…. This is my question aim!
And the current theory understood that clearly…
And told also a clear answer … that
Any solar planet is separated from the others - each planet is found and move independently..
So the two visions are clear before our eyes ……And the fighting is clear also….
The Solar Group Classical Vision: tells us that… the planet is created independently and move by gravity with the sun without effect of the other solar planets….
My Suggested Vision Is:
The Solar Group is one body – one machine – one building – one geometrical structure – No Planet can be found or move independently from the other planets …. Even the sun herself can't be found without the solar planets… we deal here with one machine – one geometrical structure- so if this geometrical structure has many elements we should be wise enough to see that these elements are members in the same geometrical structure and this structure is found by the cooperation and integration of his members…..
We should fight to prove that we are correct and the current theory is mistaken… Please read the argument…
Recommended
Why Jupiter Diameter =142984 km? (part no.3)
This Paper discusses and proves the following hypothesis:
Light Is An Essential Player In The Matter Creation Process
Human mind realization process uses the light velocity
Research Main Conclusion:
The Human Mind Realization Process Uses The Light Velocity
This conclusion is produced by the Following Questions Analysis:
Special Theory Of Relativity Tells Us "If a particle moves by high velocity (Approximately) relative to an observer – the observer will see relativistic effects effected on this particle – (The relativistic effects are Length Contraction - Time Dilation - Mass Increase)
The Questions
1- Are These Relativistic Effects Occurred For The Particle Nature Or For Our Vision Only? (to see something wrong as in the mirage)
2- If these effects are occurred for the Particle Nature – Why the Particle Nature Changes As Result Of The Light Velocity Motion?
3- Is The Particle Nature A Real Nature Or Found Because Of The Observer Effect On This Particle?
This Paper discusses these questions and The Conclusion Proves which are:
1- The Relativistic Effects Analysis
2- A Quantized Experiment
3- The Solar Planet Moves According To A Physical Law (and Not in Chaos)
4- The Moon Angular Diameter
5- The Human Body Contains Electromagnetic Waves
This paper contains 2 points only – Point No.2 (Research Methodology) and Point No. 3 (Research Conclusion Proves)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
A summary of my research part 2- (matter creation discussion)
A Summary Of My Research -Part 2- (Matter Creation Discussion)
Abstract
We complete our discussion in the previous paper
A Summary Of My Research
Paper Hypothesis
Solar Planet Matter is Created Based On The Following Features:
A- Planet Matter Can't Be Created by Any Random process
B- Planet Matter Can't Be Created Independently From Other Planets Matters
(Planet Diameter and Mass supports this claim)
C- There's a direct relationship between planet diameter and orbital distance
The solar group is one body
The document presents a hypothesis that the solar system is one geometrical structure, with each planet playing a role. It provides equations and data showing relationships between planetary diameters, distances, radii, and circumferences that suggest their dimensions were created based on geometrical reasons and as parts of a single system, rather than randomly. The author aims to analyze planetary data to understand how it was determined and prove the solar system is a designed, integrated whole rather than the result of chance processes.
Metonic and saros cycles harmony reason
Metonic and Saros Cycles Harmony proves there's a geometrical structure unifies and connects all solar planets.
This papers tries to answer the following question…
Why Metonic Cycle period 6939.75 days = Saros Cycle Period 6585.4 days + Synodic year 354.39 days?
Jupiter Has A Cycle Of 8 Days (III)
Paper hypothesis:
-Jupiter Cycle of 8 of Jupiter days (=79.2 hours), this Cycle effects on Uranus Orbital Period (30589 solar days)
The hypothesis Explanation:
-Jupiter cycle of 8 days proves that, Uranus orbital period (30589 solar days) can be used as (30589 seconds)!
-That tells us, different rates of time are found in the solar system, and tells also that, several interactions are found between the planets motions which we can't discovered because these interactions are done on different rates of time
-Shortly … Because
-Light motion features are found in the planets motions, Classical Mechanics Science can't help us to discover all interactions found between planets motions, Instead we have to use Relativistic Motions Science to discover these interactions.
Paper Objective:
-The paper discusses the interaction between Jupiter and Uranus Motions which is seen in the dependency of Uranus Orbital Period & Jupiter 8 Days Cycle.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Jupiter Effect On The Inner Planets (VI)
This paper tried to answer the questions:
-Why Jupiter orbital circumference = The Inner Planets Orbital Circumferences Total + Saturn Orbital Distance?
-Why Mercury Day needs 5040 seconds to be =176 solar days?
-Why Mercury Pluto Distance = 5848.2 mkm?
Paper Conclusions
-There's a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/sec in the solar system
-Jupiter Data Shows The Solar System Energy Distribution
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance?
Why Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance?
Best regards
When I have discovered that..
Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance
I have asked Why? But the usual answer was ……
It's Pure coincidence….!
Later I have discovered more equalities….As the following:
1. Saturn Orbital Distance = Mars Orbital Circumference = Pluto Eccentricity distance = Saturn Uranus Distance = 1433.5 million km
2. Mercury Saturn Distance = Neptune Pluto Distance = 1375 million km
3. Saturn Pluto Distance = Mercury Neptune Distance = 4436.5 million km
Then I have asked again… why These Distances Are Equal? Is there a geometrical reason behind?…but the usual answer always be …. " Pure Coincidences"
The question wasn't so simple and the answer was mentioned…. I ask clearly… are the solar planets members in the same body? or parts in the same building?- shortly are the solar group as the human hand and the fingers are similar to the planets? means the planets are created and moving depending on each other because all of them consist one machine –one body –one building – one geometrical structure – means the planets aren't separated from each other– but connected with each other.
(that means the space between the planets is a method to connect each planet with others and not to separate each planet from the others)…. This is my question aim!
And the current theory understood that clearly…
And told also a clear answer … that
Any solar planet is separated from the others - each planet is found and move independently..
So the two visions are clear before our eyes ……And the fighting is clear also….
The Solar Group Classical Vision: tells us that… the planet is created independently and move by gravity with the sun without effect of the other solar planets….
My Suggested Vision Is:
The Solar Group is one body – one machine – one building – one geometrical structure – No Planet can be found or move independently from the other planets …. Even the sun herself can't be found without the solar planets… we deal here with one machine – one geometrical structure- so if this geometrical structure has many elements we should be wise enough to see that these elements are members in the same geometrical structure and this structure is found by the cooperation and integration of his members…..
We should fight to prove that we are correct and the current theory is mistaken… Please read the argument…
Matter Creation Principle (Part V)
Paper Main Idea:
- Light with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec travels for 1 second only
- This light motion energy causes a planet to move for 1 solar day
- (Specifically) Light Motion for 1 second causes Pluto to move 1 solar day
- Pluto motion for 1 solar day causes Solar Planets Creation Process
- Pluto moves -during a solar day- a distance = 406000 km
- That's why Pluto Motion Daily =406000 km = Solar Planets Diameters Total
Based on this description …
(light motion for 1 second =1.16mkm) / (Pluto motion for 1 solar day =0.406mkm) = A
Conclusion
The Rate (A=2.8571) Controls Solar Group Basic Data
Solar System Geometry (Summarized Discussion)
The document discusses the geometry of the solar system. It provides data on planetary properties and proposes that:
1) The solar system is a single trajectory of energy, with each planet representing a point on that trajectory.
2) All planetary data, such as diameters, masses, and orbital distances, are created relative to each other based on a single underlying equation.
3) Jupiter plays a central role, with its diameter determining the total diameter of all planets and its energy owning the main energy of the solar system. Equations are presented showing relationships between Jupiter and Saturn.
Kepler 3rd law explanation (a claim against nobel prize board decision in ph...
A claim against Nobel Prize Board Decision – in Physics -2018
Best Greetings
I send this paper as a claim to the Nobel Prize Decision Board - for their decision - for Nobel Prize in physics 2018
Of course I have nothing against the great people who receive the Nobel Prize in Physics 2018 and I congratulate them for their great works
But at my side, I found there's a serious question here
Because I explained frequently in my research that, there's a serious contradiction in physics current theories and we can't understand the solar group geometry if no one solves this contradiction…
I Provided many hard arguments to prove this claim and thought that, the Nobel Prize Board will support me to solve this contradiction in physics.
But I found the Board decision avoids my work!
For that reason I summarized the main idea in this paper and send it as a claim to the Nobel Prize Decision Board
And I wish the board will accept to give me a chance to explain and defend my point of view..
With the Best Regards
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
All my papers
http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
Research presentation (more discussion)
The Solar System Geometry Analysis
Research Presentation (More Discussion)
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Research Presentation (Revised) (III)
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The research presentation
The Solar System Geometry Analysis
Research Presentation
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse draws the cart –Similar to that – light motion leads planet motion- based on that light motion is the energy source by which planet does its motion)
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The research presentation (revised)
The Solar System Geometry Analysis
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Research presentation (revised) (iv) (corrected)
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Research Presentation (Revised) (IV)
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The research presentation (revised) (ii)
This document presents a research hypothesis that planet motion depends on light motion. It provides four proofs of this hypothesis:
1) Matter and space dimensions are created proportionally based on an equation. This explains why the sun and moon appear the same size.
2) Planet orbital distances appear proportional to diameters, supporting the first proof. Mars' position may have changed, supporting this.
3) Lorentz transformations show that particle properties change with motion, providing consistency with the first two proofs.
4) A "Mars Migration Theory" explains anomalies in theories of Earth's moon by proposing Mars collided with Earth and Venus as it migrated outwards. This supports the claim that orbital distances relate to diameters.
Definition of space (revised)
The Space is Energy
This supports the claim
"There's A Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance"
This paper discusses and tries to prove this fact
Planet data geometrical significance
"Research Hypothesis"
Solar Planets Data Are Created Based On One Equation Only
The Hypothesis Explanation
Solar planets data such as Planet Diameter – Orbital Distance – Orbital Period - Orbital Inclination- Axial Tilt…..etc
All this data is created based on One Equation Only
This paper has 3 objectives which are:
1st to prove the research hypothesis
2nd to explain "how to analyze planets data to conclude the geometrical rules behind it"
3rd to discuss the theoretical basics, on which this one equation is created
Mars Immigration Theory (Part II) (Questions and Answers)
Abstract
We discuss here many questions concerning "Mars Immigration Theory"
Let's write the questions in the following order:
(Question No. 1)
How To Prove That Mars Original Orbital Distance Was 84 Mkm And Mars Had Immigrated To Its New Orbital Distance Point 227.9 Mkm
(Question No. 2)
If Mars Diameter Is Changed Through The History, How Can To Prove That?
(Question No. 3)
Why Mars had immigrated from its original point (84 mkm)? And Why specifically to the point 227.9 mkm? Why not to 200 mkm or 250 mkm?
Please Note
Mars Immigration Theory Is Supported By The Giant –Impact Hypothesis
Where This Hypothesis provides Many Geological Proves For Mars Immigration
And
Mars Immigration Theory solves many important questions to improve the Giant-Impact Hypothesis…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Is There A Geometrical Shape For The Space
Is There A Geometrical Shape For The Space?
Yes …
How to prove?
Let's see the moon orbit data in following:
1- Earth moon distance at perigee radius = the outer planets diameters total (1%)
2- Earth moon distance at apogee radius = the solar planets diameters total
3- The moon orbital distance between Perigee and apogee = Earth Circumference = the inner planets diameters total
4- Earth moon distance at total solar eclipse radius = Saturn Circumference
How to explain this data? Can we imagine that Saturn is created after the Earth Moon creation and Saturn used the moon Data
Imagine you have an area and you used partitions to create rooms and offices in this area – now – imagine that – these partitions are so transparent and can't be seen by any person – how to know if the partitions are found or not?
They prevent you to pass– when we don't see the partition it forces us to stop – the moon has to stop at defined points in its motion – the moon can't move beyond neither perigee nor apogee, where both points are defined by other calculations NOT related to the moon motion – even if we don't know yet by what geometrical mechanism the planets diameters total can restrict the moon motion! but because the same points are defined by other calculations that tell us – the restriction points were made by The Space Division and not by the moon motion – that's what I try to prove in this paper – and if I prove that the space is divided, that will prove my claim – "There's A Geometrical Shape For The Space"
Paper Contents
2- The Earth Moon Orbit Analysis
3- Jupiter Effect of the Earth Moon Creation and Motion
4- Mars Migration Theory Revision (The Earth Moon Creation)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar Planet Velocity Analysis (Revised)
Paper Hypotheses
(1)
Planet Velocity shows, Planet Motion is a part of A Greater Motion-
(2)
Planet Velocity shows, Planets motions are similar to a train motion- it's one unified motion – and as a train moves with its carriages – the solar system moves one general motion with all planets. ("Train Motion Concept")
(3)
Planets different velocities can't disprove "Train Motion Concept".
(4)
Space is NOT nothingness but a geometrical player in the solar system geometry
(5)
Space & Matter are created relative (and complementary) to each other
Special theory of relativity (questions for discussion)
This paper provides many difficult questions concerning Special Theory of Relativity
To explain that the theory needs extension.
In fact – the theory is so hard to be understood – and I try to prove that this theory is a correct theory but it's just a part of a general one which is NOT GR !
Let's define the discussion content in following
Discussion Content
1- Special Theory of Relativity Hypothesis
2- The Relativistic Effects (Length Contraction As Example)
3- Matter Creation (Preferred Reference of Frame)
4- The Relative Concept
5- A New Relativistic Feature (My Conclusion)
The Moon Creation Effect On The Solar System Geometry
-Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during 10921 seconds a distance = 142984 km = Jupiter diameter
-But, The Earth moon circumference =10921 km
-We are astonished, and asked, how a planet circumference can be used as a period of time? But the answer was "It's Just Pure Coincidence Of Numbers!"
- There's no doubt that this answer is mistaken
- Even if, we provide more examples – as this one –
- Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during 7510 seconds a distance = 51118 km = Uranus Diameter!
- But, Pluto circumference =7510 km
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Neptune data shows the solar group geometry
Research Paper
"Neptune Data shows The Solar Group Geometry"
Abstract
Neptune Data supports the following conclusions:
1- The solar group is created from one energy only
2- The solar group is built by one geometrical structure and each planet is a part in this geometrical structure (or the solar group is a body and each planet is a member in it)
3- This geometrical structure causes to produce all solar planets data to be suitable for its job in this geometrical structure (which guarantees the planets motions harmony)
4- The solar planet motion real trajectory is square but we see it as an ellipse because of the moon orbit geometrical effect.
5- The Metonic Cycle (6939.75 days) is a motion in a vertical level relative to the solar inner planets horizontal level.
6- The moon orbit regression yearly 19 degrees is done because of Neptune and Uranus effect on the moon orbit geometrical structure.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
The moon orbit geometrical structure
The first question in this research was why we see the sun disc = the moon disc? i.e. why (the Sun diameter/ the moon diameter) = (earth orbital distance/ Earth Moon distance)?
The answer was "That's only Pure Coincidence" (No.1)
Then I found another question…
The Earth-Moon Orbit circumference at apogee radius (406000km) = 2.58 mkm = Earth daily motion… why?
"That's also Pure Coincidence" (No.2)
Then I found the moon orbit geometrical relationships which are:
6. Earth Moon Distance at Perigee point =363000 km = Solar Outer Planets Diameters Total (error 1%)
7. Earth Moon Distance at Apogee point =406000 km = Solar Planets Diameters Total
8. The Distance between Perigee and Apogee = 40000km = Inner Solar Planets Diameters Total = Earth Circumference.
9. Saturn Circumference = Earth Moon Distance at total solar eclipse radius (377000km)
Why the previous relationships are found?
"Surely these are Pure Coincidence" (No.3)
Let's then with more depth, the moon has to move daily a distance = Earth daily motion, otherwise they will be separated from each other.. that means the moon should move daily =2.58 mkm, but we know that the moon orbit circumference at apogee radius (406000km) also 2.58mkm ..why?
"We all know this is Pure Coincidence" (No.4)
Then Metonic Cycle question is produced
Why the moon orbit regresses daily 19 degrees? Why the moon rotates Metonic Cycle which Earth doesn't? let's think with some deep vision
Metonic Cycle period = 6939.75 days
6939.75 days = 19 x 365.25 days (19 sidereal years)
= 235 x 29.53 days (Synodic Month)
= 20 x 346.6 days (nodal year)
The previous data tells us that, the Earth motion is in harmony with Moon and Moon orbit motions, that's why the three motions finish their cycles in the same time \
Why?
"Just Pure Coincidence" (No.5)
I found we need to find some logical and physical explanation behind all these data, I can't accept any of these as Pure coincidences…
The moon orbit analysis
The Moon Orbit Analysis
Earth Moon motion has specific 4 points which are:
1. Perigee Point (R1) : Radius 363000 km from Earth (the nearest point)
2. Total Solar Eclipse (R2) : Radius 377000 km from Earth
3. Average Moon Orbit (R3) : Radius 384000 km (registered)
4. Apogee Point (R4) : Radius 406000 km from Earth (the most far point)
These 4 points are defined by 4 geometrical rules which are:
- (1st Rule) Pythagoras rule : R2n + (86000km)2= R2n+1
(why 86000 km? we'll discuss that in this paper)
- (2nd Rule) Moon Orbital Circumference at Rn= (1/Rn+1)
- (3rd Rule) (Moon Orbital Circumference at Rn+1/ Moon Orbital Circumference at Rn) =1.0725
- (4th Rule) The Rate 365.25
This paper tries to prove this fact, and discusses more deep question… why the moon orbital different radiuses are defined by these 4 geometrical rules?
Definition of space
The Space is Energy
This fact can be proved directly by Earth Jupiter Distance Analysis (627 million km)
That means the matter and distance are created from Energy regardless their different forms (The sun rays is different from the oil but both are energy)
This fact supports the main idea in my research that:
The solar group is a trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on this trajectory.
A Summary Of My Research
Research Summary
I- Research Main Questions
1- How Planet Diameter Is Created? (= How The Matter Is Created?)
2- How Planet orbital distance is defined (= What's The Space?)
3- Is There A Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
(i.e. Does Space effect on Matter Creation Process?)
II- Research Methodology
I use the planets data analysis to discover the concepts on which they are created?
(I use NASA Planetary Fact Sheet as the only source for Planets Data)
III- Research Hypothesis
(A) Research Primary Hypothesis (have no proves)
- The Matter is created of Energy (E=mc2 supports this idea)
- The Space is Energy (my Hypothesis)
(B) Research Main Hypothesis (have proves)
1- The Solar Group is One Building And Each Planet is A Part Of It
2- There Are Relativistic Effects In The Solar Group
3- Mars Orbital Distance is Changed Through Solar Group History
More Related Content
What's hot
Matter Creation Principle (Part V)
Paper Main Idea:
- Light with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec travels for 1 second only
- This light motion energy causes a planet to move for 1 solar day
- (Specifically) Light Motion for 1 second causes Pluto to move 1 solar day
- Pluto motion for 1 solar day causes Solar Planets Creation Process
- Pluto moves -during a solar day- a distance = 406000 km
- That's why Pluto Motion Daily =406000 km = Solar Planets Diameters Total
Based on this description …
(light motion for 1 second =1.16mkm) / (Pluto motion for 1 solar day =0.406mkm) = A
Conclusion
The Rate (A=2.8571) Controls Solar Group Basic Data
Solar System Geometry (Summarized Discussion)
The document discusses the geometry of the solar system. It provides data on planetary properties and proposes that:
1) The solar system is a single trajectory of energy, with each planet representing a point on that trajectory.
2) All planetary data, such as diameters, masses, and orbital distances, are created relative to each other based on a single underlying equation.
3) Jupiter plays a central role, with its diameter determining the total diameter of all planets and its energy owning the main energy of the solar system. Equations are presented showing relationships between Jupiter and Saturn.
Kepler 3rd law explanation (a claim against nobel prize board decision in ph...
A claim against Nobel Prize Board Decision – in Physics -2018
Best Greetings
I send this paper as a claim to the Nobel Prize Decision Board - for their decision - for Nobel Prize in physics 2018
Of course I have nothing against the great people who receive the Nobel Prize in Physics 2018 and I congratulate them for their great works
But at my side, I found there's a serious question here
Because I explained frequently in my research that, there's a serious contradiction in physics current theories and we can't understand the solar group geometry if no one solves this contradiction…
I Provided many hard arguments to prove this claim and thought that, the Nobel Prize Board will support me to solve this contradiction in physics.
But I found the Board decision avoids my work!
For that reason I summarized the main idea in this paper and send it as a claim to the Nobel Prize Decision Board
And I wish the board will accept to give me a chance to explain and defend my point of view..
With the Best Regards
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
All my papers
http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
Research presentation (more discussion)
The Solar System Geometry Analysis
Research Presentation (More Discussion)
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Research Presentation (Revised) (III)
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The research presentation
The Solar System Geometry Analysis
Research Presentation
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse draws the cart –Similar to that – light motion leads planet motion- based on that light motion is the energy source by which planet does its motion)
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The research presentation (revised)
The Solar System Geometry Analysis
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Research presentation (revised) (iv) (corrected)
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Research Presentation (Revised) (IV)
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The research presentation (revised) (ii)
This document presents a research hypothesis that planet motion depends on light motion. It provides four proofs of this hypothesis:
1) Matter and space dimensions are created proportionally based on an equation. This explains why the sun and moon appear the same size.
2) Planet orbital distances appear proportional to diameters, supporting the first proof. Mars' position may have changed, supporting this.
3) Lorentz transformations show that particle properties change with motion, providing consistency with the first two proofs.
4) A "Mars Migration Theory" explains anomalies in theories of Earth's moon by proposing Mars collided with Earth and Venus as it migrated outwards. This supports the claim that orbital distances relate to diameters.
Definition of space (revised)
The Space is Energy
This supports the claim
"There's A Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance"
This paper discusses and tries to prove this fact
Planet data geometrical significance
"Research Hypothesis"
Solar Planets Data Are Created Based On One Equation Only
The Hypothesis Explanation
Solar planets data such as Planet Diameter – Orbital Distance – Orbital Period - Orbital Inclination- Axial Tilt…..etc
All this data is created based on One Equation Only
This paper has 3 objectives which are:
1st to prove the research hypothesis
2nd to explain "how to analyze planets data to conclude the geometrical rules behind it"
3rd to discuss the theoretical basics, on which this one equation is created
Mars Immigration Theory (Part II) (Questions and Answers)
Abstract
We discuss here many questions concerning "Mars Immigration Theory"
Let's write the questions in the following order:
(Question No. 1)
How To Prove That Mars Original Orbital Distance Was 84 Mkm And Mars Had Immigrated To Its New Orbital Distance Point 227.9 Mkm
(Question No. 2)
If Mars Diameter Is Changed Through The History, How Can To Prove That?
(Question No. 3)
Why Mars had immigrated from its original point (84 mkm)? And Why specifically to the point 227.9 mkm? Why not to 200 mkm or 250 mkm?
Please Note
Mars Immigration Theory Is Supported By The Giant –Impact Hypothesis
Where This Hypothesis provides Many Geological Proves For Mars Immigration
And
Mars Immigration Theory solves many important questions to improve the Giant-Impact Hypothesis…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Is There A Geometrical Shape For The Space
Is There A Geometrical Shape For The Space?
Yes …
How to prove?
Let's see the moon orbit data in following:
1- Earth moon distance at perigee radius = the outer planets diameters total (1%)
2- Earth moon distance at apogee radius = the solar planets diameters total
3- The moon orbital distance between Perigee and apogee = Earth Circumference = the inner planets diameters total
4- Earth moon distance at total solar eclipse radius = Saturn Circumference
How to explain this data? Can we imagine that Saturn is created after the Earth Moon creation and Saturn used the moon Data
Imagine you have an area and you used partitions to create rooms and offices in this area – now – imagine that – these partitions are so transparent and can't be seen by any person – how to know if the partitions are found or not?
They prevent you to pass– when we don't see the partition it forces us to stop – the moon has to stop at defined points in its motion – the moon can't move beyond neither perigee nor apogee, where both points are defined by other calculations NOT related to the moon motion – even if we don't know yet by what geometrical mechanism the planets diameters total can restrict the moon motion! but because the same points are defined by other calculations that tell us – the restriction points were made by The Space Division and not by the moon motion – that's what I try to prove in this paper – and if I prove that the space is divided, that will prove my claim – "There's A Geometrical Shape For The Space"
Paper Contents
2- The Earth Moon Orbit Analysis
3- Jupiter Effect of the Earth Moon Creation and Motion
4- Mars Migration Theory Revision (The Earth Moon Creation)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar Planet Velocity Analysis (Revised)
Paper Hypotheses
(1)
Planet Velocity shows, Planet Motion is a part of A Greater Motion-
(2)
Planet Velocity shows, Planets motions are similar to a train motion- it's one unified motion – and as a train moves with its carriages – the solar system moves one general motion with all planets. ("Train Motion Concept")
(3)
Planets different velocities can't disprove "Train Motion Concept".
(4)
Space is NOT nothingness but a geometrical player in the solar system geometry
(5)
Space & Matter are created relative (and complementary) to each other
Special theory of relativity (questions for discussion)
This paper provides many difficult questions concerning Special Theory of Relativity
To explain that the theory needs extension.
In fact – the theory is so hard to be understood – and I try to prove that this theory is a correct theory but it's just a part of a general one which is NOT GR !
Let's define the discussion content in following
Discussion Content
1- Special Theory of Relativity Hypothesis
2- The Relativistic Effects (Length Contraction As Example)
3- Matter Creation (Preferred Reference of Frame)
4- The Relative Concept
5- A New Relativistic Feature (My Conclusion)
The Moon Creation Effect On The Solar System Geometry
-Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during 10921 seconds a distance = 142984 km = Jupiter diameter
-But, The Earth moon circumference =10921 km
-We are astonished, and asked, how a planet circumference can be used as a period of time? But the answer was "It's Just Pure Coincidence Of Numbers!"
- There's no doubt that this answer is mistaken
- Even if, we provide more examples – as this one –
- Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during 7510 seconds a distance = 51118 km = Uranus Diameter!
- But, Pluto circumference =7510 km
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Neptune data shows the solar group geometry
Research Paper
"Neptune Data shows The Solar Group Geometry"
Abstract
Neptune Data supports the following conclusions:
1- The solar group is created from one energy only
2- The solar group is built by one geometrical structure and each planet is a part in this geometrical structure (or the solar group is a body and each planet is a member in it)
3- This geometrical structure causes to produce all solar planets data to be suitable for its job in this geometrical structure (which guarantees the planets motions harmony)
4- The solar planet motion real trajectory is square but we see it as an ellipse because of the moon orbit geometrical effect.
5- The Metonic Cycle (6939.75 days) is a motion in a vertical level relative to the solar inner planets horizontal level.
6- The moon orbit regression yearly 19 degrees is done because of Neptune and Uranus effect on the moon orbit geometrical structure.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
The moon orbit geometrical structure
The first question in this research was why we see the sun disc = the moon disc? i.e. why (the Sun diameter/ the moon diameter) = (earth orbital distance/ Earth Moon distance)?
The answer was "That's only Pure Coincidence" (No.1)
Then I found another question…
The Earth-Moon Orbit circumference at apogee radius (406000km) = 2.58 mkm = Earth daily motion… why?
"That's also Pure Coincidence" (No.2)
Then I found the moon orbit geometrical relationships which are:
6. Earth Moon Distance at Perigee point =363000 km = Solar Outer Planets Diameters Total (error 1%)
7. Earth Moon Distance at Apogee point =406000 km = Solar Planets Diameters Total
8. The Distance between Perigee and Apogee = 40000km = Inner Solar Planets Diameters Total = Earth Circumference.
9. Saturn Circumference = Earth Moon Distance at total solar eclipse radius (377000km)
Why the previous relationships are found?
"Surely these are Pure Coincidence" (No.3)
Let's then with more depth, the moon has to move daily a distance = Earth daily motion, otherwise they will be separated from each other.. that means the moon should move daily =2.58 mkm, but we know that the moon orbit circumference at apogee radius (406000km) also 2.58mkm ..why?
"We all know this is Pure Coincidence" (No.4)
Then Metonic Cycle question is produced
Why the moon orbit regresses daily 19 degrees? Why the moon rotates Metonic Cycle which Earth doesn't? let's think with some deep vision
Metonic Cycle period = 6939.75 days
6939.75 days = 19 x 365.25 days (19 sidereal years)
= 235 x 29.53 days (Synodic Month)
= 20 x 346.6 days (nodal year)
The previous data tells us that, the Earth motion is in harmony with Moon and Moon orbit motions, that's why the three motions finish their cycles in the same time \
Why?
"Just Pure Coincidence" (No.5)
I found we need to find some logical and physical explanation behind all these data, I can't accept any of these as Pure coincidences…
The moon orbit analysis
The Moon Orbit Analysis
Earth Moon motion has specific 4 points which are:
1. Perigee Point (R1) : Radius 363000 km from Earth (the nearest point)
2. Total Solar Eclipse (R2) : Radius 377000 km from Earth
3. Average Moon Orbit (R3) : Radius 384000 km (registered)
4. Apogee Point (R4) : Radius 406000 km from Earth (the most far point)
These 4 points are defined by 4 geometrical rules which are:
- (1st Rule) Pythagoras rule : R2n + (86000km)2= R2n+1
(why 86000 km? we'll discuss that in this paper)
- (2nd Rule) Moon Orbital Circumference at Rn= (1/Rn+1)
- (3rd Rule) (Moon Orbital Circumference at Rn+1/ Moon Orbital Circumference at Rn) =1.0725
- (4th Rule) The Rate 365.25
This paper tries to prove this fact, and discusses more deep question… why the moon orbital different radiuses are defined by these 4 geometrical rules?
What's hot (20)
Kepler 3rd law explanation (a claim against nobel prize board decision in ph...
Kepler 3rd law explanation (a claim against nobel prize board decision in ph...
Mars Immigration Theory (Part II) (Questions and Answers)
Mars Immigration Theory (Part II) (Questions and Answers)
Special theory of relativity (questions for discussion)
Special theory of relativity (questions for discussion)
The Moon Creation Effect On The Solar System Geometry
The Moon Creation Effect On The Solar System Geometry
Similar to The observer effect on the observation results (space = energy=mc2)
Definition of space
The Space is Energy
This fact can be proved directly by Earth Jupiter Distance Analysis (627 million km)
That means the matter and distance are created from Energy regardless their different forms (The sun rays is different from the oil but both are energy)
This fact supports the main idea in my research that:
The solar group is a trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on this trajectory.
A Summary Of My Research
Research Summary
I- Research Main Questions
1- How Planet Diameter Is Created? (= How The Matter Is Created?)
2- How Planet orbital distance is defined (= What's The Space?)
3- Is There A Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
(i.e. Does Space effect on Matter Creation Process?)
II- Research Methodology
I use the planets data analysis to discover the concepts on which they are created?
(I use NASA Planetary Fact Sheet as the only source for Planets Data)
III- Research Hypothesis
(A) Research Primary Hypothesis (have no proves)
- The Matter is created of Energy (E=mc2 supports this idea)
- The Space is Energy (my Hypothesis)
(B) Research Main Hypothesis (have proves)
1- The Solar Group is One Building And Each Planet is A Part Of It
2- There Are Relativistic Effects In The Solar Group
3- Mars Orbital Distance is Changed Through Solar Group History
Does The Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features (II)
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar System Geometry depends On Light Motion Features
The Hypothesis proves
- The Solar System Data can be explained only by using the light motion geometrical features … let's see some data & Rules in following:
The Equal Distances 50% at least of all distances in the solar system distances are equal each other – we have these distances in the previous paper (Does the Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features?) – We can't explain why these distances are equal each other unless we suggest that these distances are created by a light beam and its reflected one
The Rated Distances by the rate 1.0725 – these distances also we have seen in the previous paper – around 40 % of all the solar planets distances are rated to each by the same one rate (1.0725) and we can't explain why? unless we suggest that – these distances also were equal as the previous point distances but the reflected light beams of these distances are reflected in another frame which created Lorentz length Contraction Phenomenon for all these distances – otherwise why by the same one rate 40% of all distances are rated
The proportionality between the matter and space in the solar system – this also should be a proof that the solar system geometry depends on light motion features - the previous prove we have discussed in the previous paper with many others – is there any new proof?
A NEW PROOF
The Universe Creator is the Motion and NOT the Matter – i.e. – the motion is found before the matter creation- this concept proves that the solar system geometry depends on light motion features. – the paper discuss and tries to prove this concept…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon
Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?
Abstract
Paper Question
"Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?"
Based on what this question is asked? What meaning is behind?
The Earth Moon is created by a direct effect of Jupiter – means – if Jupiter doesn't effect directly on the Earth Moon Creation – the moon should have change in its own data
i.e.
The Earth moon has its own data values (diameter - mass – orbital inclination …etc) this data is created by its Values because of Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation otherwise this data should be changed
Shortly
- If Jupiter didn't effect on the Earth moon creation process – the Earth moon diameter shouldn't be 3475 km and its mass should change from 0.073x 1024 kg also its orbital distance can't be 0.384 mkm and axial tilt should change from 6.7 degrees and its orbital inclination should not be 5.1 degrees ….similar to that, all Earth Moon Data should be changed…
- The next question is – Why Jupiter did effect on the Earth Mon Creation? This question is out of this paper scope – here we try to prove that – the Earth Moon Data is created by its values just because of Jupiter effect on it.
- How to prove this claim – I use The Planets Data Analysis Direction as a method of astrophysics research to prove this fact –
(The Planets Data Direction Method is explained in the paper methodology)
Paper Contents
2- Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation?
3- Mars Migration Theory Revision
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
No Random Process Causes The Solar Group Creation (No Big Bang)
The Main Conclusion
The solar group can't be created by any random process.
i.e.
The Big Bang Concept is Unreal
The previous conclusion is produced easily and clearly through the solar planets data analysis..
That means…
The Big Bang Theory contradicts strongly and clearly with the solar planets data analysis and their geometrical meanings which supports the claim that, the big bang concept is Unreal one.
This paper tries to show and prove this contradiction and to show that the solar planets data analysis is the best way to understand the solar group origin and motion which necessitates to review many other theories concern the solar group origin an motion.
Solar planet data geometrical concepts disproves the current theory
I claim that, the Solar group current theory and description are incorrect completely And
contradict directly with the solar planet data geometrical meanings…
let's discuss one example only for explanation…
Example No.1
How the planet orbital distance is defined? How does the planet move? By gravity…
The gravitation equation defines the planet orbital distance… !
Let's examine this answer
1st critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
The current theory tells us this is pure coincidences!
But
There's similar order (but reversed). Let's see that
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
The current theory still consider this second order also as "pure Coincidences"
But
Uranus Diameter is greater than Neptune Diameter, where Neptune Mass is greater than Uranus… that tells us the solar planets order is done depending on the diameter and not on the mass! disproving the gravity concept …!
This critic also is "pure coincidences", the current theory still insists …
2nd Critic/
If the planet moves by gravity, and defines his orbital distance by the gravitation equation, which depends on the masses, why Jupiter isn't in place of Mercury? Why the greatest Mass has no shortest orbital distance? According to the gravitation equation (m/r2)? The told answer is because of the initial points!! And why we accept the gravitation equation based on that if there's no any proof for it?!
For myself I try to understand and don't believe deeply the current theory
So the conclusions are clear before my eyes
1- There's A Relationship Between The Planet Diameter And His Orbital Distance
2- Mars causes Disturbance For This Relationship
In this paper I provide many similar points which disprove clearly the current theory and push us to find more sufficient theory to explain the solar group origin and motion.
Does mars fit his position is the solar group why not
The Claim
Mars Data Doesn't Fit his Position In The Solar Group
Because
Mars had immigrated from his original point with distance 84 million km from the sun and dwell in his new point with distance 227.9 million km from the sun (My Conclusion)
So Mars Data was fit to his original position (with distance 84 mkm)
But
Mars Data doesn't fit his new position (with distance 227.9 mkm)
This paper analyzes Mars Data to prove this Fact.
Matter Creation Known Features (Analytical Study)
How the matter is created? Let's summarize the known features in following:
1- Lorentz Transformations tell us that – Particle length and Mass are effected (changed) with high velocity motion – which tells us that- Particle Data may be created relative to its motion.
2- Gauss Law tells us that – the net electric charges of conductor resides entirely on its surface –referring to that the matter geometrical shape is created relative to any electromagnetic field may effect on it.
3- Light reflection and refraction tell us that – the matter different types are created relative to light effects on them
4- Electric Field defines the motions direction – which tells that – the electric field was necessary for the solar planets creation to save planets motions unified direction around the sun
5- Planets Data shows That Matter Is Created Depending On A Period Of Time
6- Planets Diameters & Masses Show A Dependency On Each Other
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The moon indeed moves by gravity (iii) (explanation)
Paper hypotheses
- Light Motion For 1 Second causes Planet Motion For 1 Solar Day (my research 5th hypothesis)
- Planet Matter is created as a result of Planet motion
- Solar system matters are created by planet motion for 2 Solar Days
- Saturn orbital distance is the required distance to be passed by the solar system unified motion during 1 solar day ("The Train Motion Concept")
- Uranus orbital distance is the required distance to be passed by the solar system unified motion during 2 Solar Days
- That explains the theoretical reason behind Uranus and Saturn strong relationship
Jupiter Effect On Pluto Motion
Paper Basic Question
Why do we analyze Jupiter Data and effect on different Planets?
Because
I try to prove that,
-The planets motions are light motions but we see them motions in planets motions form
-It's a light beam which causes the planets to move in front of us in the sky
-There's no gravity from the sun, there's no Big Bang theory – No more imaginations
-It's A Light Beam Motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar system geometry (summarized discussion part 2)
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
The Sun Rays Is Produced By Planets Motions Energies Accumulations
The paper tries to prove this fact
Solar Group Alternative Description
1- The solar group is one trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on this same trajectory …i.e.
2- The Solar Group is One Building and each planet is a part of this same building-
3- Also The solar group is similar to a train and each planet is a carriage of it.
4- Also the solar group can be similar to one body, and each planet is a member in it
5- Also, The solar group can be similar to one machine, each planet is a gear in it
6- Planet moves with all other planets together as a train moves with all carriages –
Description Basic Concept
Planets cooperation and integration is the reason of their existence and motions.
How to understand that?
WE know that the matter is created of Energy (E=mc2) – but How The Space Is Created? I suppose the Space is created of Energy also… (Space = Energy)
So the matter and space both are created from the same energy.. Can that be possible?
Energy has different forms (sun rays – nuclear interactions – oil- food ..etc)
Different forms for same content, i.e. it's possible to create matter & space of energy
Another Example
In double slit experiment (Young Experiment) – the light coherence produced bright and dark fringes –regardless the experiment explanation – the experiment tells "when one input is used (light)–outputs can be in 2 different forms (bright and dark fringes)"
The Solar Group Creation
I suppose the solar group is one energy creates the planet matter and orbital distance – so this same energy passes through the whole group to create all solar planets and their orbital distances from the same energy where this energy creates all planets data complementary to each other because all of them are created from the same source.
Shortly
The solar group is one thread – as one necklace – all solar planets and their distances are created from one energy to be complementary to each other- and that's why the planets data analysis shows the solar planets dependency.
Observation vs data analysis as astrophysics research method
The document discusses using planet data analysis as an astrophysics research method rather than relying solely on observational results. It argues that observational results without data analysis can lead to imaginary concepts. It provides examples showing relationships between various planetary properties like diameters, radii, and orbital distances. The document suggests the solar system should be viewed as one interconnected machine rather than independent planets, and questions concepts like the randomness of planetary formation and definitions of units like distance.
Why the solar planet motion trajectory is an ellipse?
1- Solar planet motion real trajectory is a square
2- This square trajectory is seen by us as circular trajectory
3- The 2 forms of trajectories (square and circular) got interaction together and produce the ellipse as the planet motion final trajectory.
4- The square and circular trajectories interaction is done by Uranus and Neptune effects…
5- Saturn is the main player in the solar group geometry
6- Planet Eccentricity supports this claim
The time definition
Abstract
- The Solar Planets motions are relativistic motions
- Earth real Velocity = 0.99 c
- The time is an Energy
- Based on Relativistic Motions, the distances values can be seen as time values
i.e.
- The time is equivalent for the distance
(a development for the Special Theory of Relativity made by me)
- The Solar group geometrical structure depends on the time and Distance equivalence (based on relativistic motions), to create different rates of time, which enables the system to accumulate the Energy
Let's summarize this idea in following:
- Based on the solar group relativistic motions, time and distances values are equivalence
- The solar geometry uses unified distances to create different values of time, which are seen by different cycles
- The time different values depend on each other to create different rates of time
- By this different rates of time the Energy can be accumulated to produce huge energy from average one.
- Based on this description, the solar planets motions produce the sun light beams
Does The Observation Process Effect On The Observed Particle Nature?
Empirical Data
An Electron Or Subatomic Particle Behaves As A Particle And Not A Wave When It's Observed!
Why?
Because
The Human Mind Realization Process Depends On (And Uses) The Light Velocity (0.3mkm/Sec)
How Does The Observer Effect On The Observed Particle Nature?
By Light Beam Produced By The Observer Mind Realization Process.
Paper Idea Summary
This paper tells a clear claim – that –
Because our minds realization process depends on and uses the light velocity (0.3mkm/sec) in the human thinking process that causes the light velocity to be a contributor factor of every thing around us – simply – We See The Universe Through The Light Velocity Effect On Our Vision-
That easily explains the equation E=mc2 – why any Mass Energy is defined relative to the light velocity?! Because the light velocity is found in our minds- that explains Why light velocity is constant in all frames
Now
Because our minds uses the light velocity (0.3mkm/sec), that enable our minds to produce light beams by the thinking process – this produced light beam can effect on any particle nature as the sun rays effect on all particles –
This is the idea shortly– let's ask……"Is this idea truth?" This paper tries to prove…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Could Plato Cave Be A Fact(II)
Plato in the Allegory of the cave tells us some interesting theory
We can't see the facts because we are prisoners in the cave
We can see only the facts shadows
So we have to analyze the seen shadows to reach to the facts
Plato's Cave is in a consistency with my theory which is
"Planet Motion depends On Light Motion"
Let's summarize this theory in following:
- The light motion is found before the creation of the universe matter
- Lorentz Transformations tells that – The matter is created as a function of its motion (this argument will be reviewed in this paper introduction)
- I suggest that – The Matter Is Created Out Of The Light - Some Change in Light Nature causes to create The Matter
How?
- Suppose we have a light its nature is changed (by This Specific Change) – So this changed light will get a new property which causes the matter creation – let's call this changed light as "The Matter Zygote"
- The Matter Zygote has a new property – where – it creates the matter based on the motion – this property isn't one of the light nature properties – because the light travels but creates no matter – "The Matter Zygote" is different because of the light nature change – and the matter zygote creates the matter by motion
- The Light Motion is the Distance Creator and Designer where the matter zygote is a follower to the light motion.
- The Light And matter pass the same distance but with different rates of time
- The matter is created as a function of its motion –means – the matter properties are created to be in harmony with this matter motion – because of that- the Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, orbital inclination and axial tilt…etc are in harmony with this same planet motion – that because the planet motion was found before the planet matter creation.
- The Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
- The Motion Concept " Planet Motion For 1 Solar Day Depends On Light Motion For 1 Second"
- The Matter Creation Concept "The Planet Matter Is Created As A Function Of Its Motion During 1 Solar Day"
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Jupiter and Venus Motions Interaction
The Paper Argument
1-The 3 inner Planets (Mercury – Venus & Earth) were created by Jupiter effect
2-Mars Is Exceptional In Its Creation
3-Jupiter orbital circumference is created based on the inner planets orbital circumferences (i.e. there's a mutual effect between Jupiter and the inner planets)
4-The inner planets & Jupiter can't define the sun position in the sky relative to their orbital circumferences
5-Jupiter and the inner planets depend on Saturn to define the sun position relative to their orbital circumferences (Through Mars Effect)
6-Saturn depends on Uranus to define the sun position in the sky
7-Uranus Is The First Planet Created Relative To The Sun
8-The Basic Connection Between Jupiter And The Inner Planets depends On Venus, Where Jupiter Venus Relationship shows an effect on the sun creation.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Could Plato Cave Be A Fact
Could Plato Cave Be A Fact?
Abstract
Plato in the Allegory of the cave tells us some interesting theory
We can't see the facts because we are prisoners in the cave
We can see only the facts shadows
So we have to analyze the seen shadows to reach to the facts
Plato's Cave is in a consistency with my theory which is
"Planet Motion depends On Light Motion"
Let's summarize this theory in following:
- The light motion is found before the creation of the universe matter
- Lorentz Transformations tells that – The matter is created as a function of its motion (this argument will be reviewed in this paper introduction)
- I suggest that – The Matter Is Created Out Of The Light - Some Change in Light Nature causes to create The Matter
How?
- Suppose we have a light its nature is changed (by This Specific Change) – So this changed light will get a new property which causes the matter creation – let's call this changed light as "The Matter Zygote"
- The Matter Zygote has a new property – where – it creates the matter based on the motion – this property isn't one of the light nature properties – because the light travels but creates no matter – "The Matter Zygote" is different because of the light nature change – and the matter zygote creates the matter by motion
- The Light Motion is the Distance Creator and Designer where the matter zygote is a follower to the light motion.
- The Light And matter pass the same distance but with different rates of time
- The matter is created as a function of its motion –means – the matter properties are created to be in harmony with this matter motion – because of that- the Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, orbital inclination and axial tilt…etc are in harmony with this same planet motion – that because the planet motion was found before the planet matter creation.
- The Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
- The Motion Concept " Planet Motion For 1 Solar Day Depends On Light Motion For 1 Second"
- The Matter Creation Concept "The Planet Matter Is Created As A Function Of Its Motion During 1 Solar Day"
Paper Basic Conclusion
-The Matter Can't Created The Universe But The Motion Can
-The Motion Is Found Before Any Matter Creation
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar planets motions trajectory is a pyramid or a cone (part ii)
The Solar Planets Motions Trajectory is A Pyramid Form and Not A Cone
Let's summarize the idea in following:
I- The Solar Planets are Found On Different Horizontal Levels (Steps) Which makes The Solar Group As A Ladder. Based On That, When The Planets revolve Around The Sun, They create A Pyramid Form For Their Motions Trajectory (The Main Hypothesis)
II- The Planet revolution around the sun which we see in ellipse form in fact it's square form.
III- i.e. What we see in circle (ellipse form), Its real form is (a square)
IV- For that reason the Planets motions Trajectory is A Pyramid and not A Cone
This Paper tries to prove this fact
Why Don't We Understand The Solar System Geometry?
Why don't We Understand The Solar System Geometry?
Because
Paper Hypothesis
- The Planets Motions are Motions of Light Beams, That means each planet motion depends on a motion of light beam – Based on that, we have to use the light geometry to explain the solar planets motions.
Shortly
- Planet Motion = Light Motion and should be studied under Relativistic Considerations
- Because we see the planets as matters move by low velocity– We consider that the light geometry is unsuitable science to explain the solar planets motions.
- That's Why – There Are Many Contradictions In The Solar Planets Motions Current Understanding And Description..
Paper Objective
- The Paper tries to prove the claim that
"The Solar Planets Motions Are Motions Of Light Beams"
Similar to The observer effect on the observation results (space = energy=mc2) (20)
Does The Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features (II)
Does The Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features (II)
No Random Process Causes The Solar Group Creation (No Big Bang)
No Random Process Causes The Solar Group Creation (No Big Bang)
Solar planet data geometrical concepts disproves the current theory
Solar planet data geometrical concepts disproves the current theory
Does mars fit his position is the solar group why not
Does mars fit his position is the solar group why not
The moon indeed moves by gravity (iii) (explanation)
The moon indeed moves by gravity (iii) (explanation)
Solar system geometry (summarized discussion part 2)
Solar system geometry (summarized discussion part 2)
Observation vs data analysis as astrophysics research method
Observation vs data analysis as astrophysics research method
Why the solar planet motion trajectory is an ellipse?
Why the solar planet motion trajectory is an ellipse?
Does The Observation Process Effect On The Observed Particle Nature?
Does The Observation Process Effect On The Observed Particle Nature?
Solar planets motions trajectory is a pyramid or a cone (part ii)
Solar planets motions trajectory is a pyramid or a cone (part ii)
Why Don't We Understand The Solar System Geometry?
Why Don't We Understand The Solar System Geometry?
More from Gerges francis
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdf
Best greetings –
2012 Phenomenon has told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The sun is a phenomenon created by the planets motions – means - the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays but the sun rays be created by Planets Motions Energies total- As a result – the sun is created after all planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun gravity where no planet moves by the sun gravity –
The hypothesis explanation
The sun creation as a phenomenon depends on the planets motions energies shows a great gab between the solar system motion description and the real facts of this motion –for that reason – I provide 2 more points to confirm this gab existence while the 2 points be less strange in meaning can prove clearly this gab is found deeply in the description– not only for the sun rays source of energy but also for the basic ideas of the solar system motion.
(Point No. I)
The Mass Gravity Force Can't Cause The Solar System Motion
The planet moves by the force which caused its creation otherwise this planet will be broken by its motion because 2 forces affect on it- Newton Is Wrong In Logic – But –
I wish to move beyond this point –because – I refuse generally the mass gravity force using as a reason for the solar system motion – the idea is wrong in concept –
Basically because
The mass gravity force is so limited force in range and can't provide the solar system motion features – we need one more powerful and intelligent force – the eclipse phenomenon may help this explanation –the force which created the planets diameters in proportionality with specific distances – and the sun diameter be used also in this process- the force considers each planet motion and velocity – thinking about the whole process to produce the total solar eclipse by many players their creation data be created for this purpose.
Usually the total solar eclipse be considered as pure coincidence result and the beauty of geometry be removed- the paper analyzes the eclipse geometrical data to show a small part of the beauty –
Can the mass gravity poor concept do that? the description Newton told can explain how the matter be created? or how is planet data created? why is the moon diameter =3475 km? because if it be 5000 km the whole geometry will be changed….
The moon creation can help to see another part of this force beauty – the moon be created by planets collision but the moon diameter be created based one exact equations – means- the force works geometrically even through the collisions
In fact
This idea also shows the gab between the solar system facts and the current theory because – while – the current description supposes the planets data be created by random process, initial conditions and unknown historical factors that fact is that the planets data be created based on exact equations
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Rays Production Theory.pdf
The Sun Rays Production Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Rays Energy Source Is The Planets Motions Energy – means- The Sun Is Not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays – instead – the planets motions energies total be used to create the sun rays.
The hypothesis explanation
I- The Sun Rays Creation Depend On The Relative Motion Concept
This point provides the method by which the sun rays be created – the rays creation depend on the relative motion – that means- we need to find 2 motions in the solar system move relative one another and the different velocity between the 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
Regardless – this is possible or not – our job be defined clearly –
We need 2 motions move relative one another and the different velocity between these 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
II- Can We Attribute Mechanical Features For The Space?
Here we try to produce the 2 relative motions –
(Let's suppose the sun isn't found but the planets still revolve around its space point)
We have to attribute mechanical features for the space – let's do that in following
We suppose the space be similar to a sea water and the planet be similar to a stick moves perpendicularly through the sea water – this is similar to – a spoon turns water in a vessel - the spoon motion through the water causes a wave in the water –
The theory supposes the planet motion causes a wave in the space –
let's use this hypothesis in our analysis…
Mercury revolves around the sun (point) with velocity 47.4 km/sec – how to see that in our description?
Mercury (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Mercury velocity is 47.4 km/sec and that causes the wave velocity to be (47.4 km/sec)
And -
Venus (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Venus velocity (35 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec = 82.4 km/sec)
And – The Earth moon (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion –the moon velocity (29.8 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec +29.8 = 112.2 km/sec) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdf
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one design – this design uses the distance 90000 million km as a distance unit.
The hypothesis explanation
The hypothesis tells – the planets distribution uses one design and this one design gives a chance for the planets to make their distances total equal 90000 million km for a unit period of time – there's a necessity to use this distance we explain here.
The data shows 2 facts
(1st Fact) One Map (One Design) Controls The Planets Distribution Between The Sun And Pluto –
(2nd Fact) This One Design Uses The Distance 90000 Million Km As A Unit
Paper first question
Why does the solar system design use the distance 90000 million km as a unit?
Let's answer in following…
If (c =300000 km/sec = light velocity) how can we measure the value (c2)?
Let's suppose we use the value (c2) for one second – how can we measure it?
In this case the value (c2) will be = 90000 million km
Now
The hypothesis tells, the planets motions aim to pass this distance (90000 million km) and to use this distance based on A Motion For A Period Of Time = One Second
(We Discover In The Paper Discussion How This Motion Can Be Created)
As a result –
The distance 90000 million km will be a equivalent to the value (c2)
And
The value (c2) is the source of energy from which the sun rays be created.
Based on that
The Sun Rays Be Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total
Means,
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion - Instead – the planets motions energies total be accumulated and be used as energy source to produce the sun rays- then the sun disc and body be created from the sun rays energy.
And
Because the planets motions aim to create the sun rays they aim to pass the required distance 90000 million km and the solar system design causes this distance to be used by a motion depends on one second
Paper second question
Can Light Beam Be Produced By Matters Relative Motion?
The planets motions distances total per solar day (=17.75 million km)
(This distance contains the Earth moon velocity which is equal Earth velocity)
During 1461 days the planets motions distances total be =25920 million km
Light (300000 km/s) travels in one day (86400 s) a distance =25920 million km
But the Earth Cycle is (365 +365+365+366 =1461 days)
The idea tells us – if 1461 seconds of the Earth motion = 1 second of the sun motion – the velocities difference between the 2 motions will be= Light Velocity (300000km/s)
The paper discusses how that can be possible- but – here – we discuss the conceptual question- can light beam be created by matters relative motion?
The planets data tells about a new method which is (Motions Use Different Rate Of Time) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion.pdf
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
means, Saturn moves by light velocity relative to the sun point –
The hypothesis Proof
The paper hypothesis tells Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
Let's prove that in following
(1)
The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time Where
One hour of Mercury motion be = 24 hours of any planet motion (except Saturn)
One hour of Any Planet motion be = 24 hours of Saturn
These rates of time be proved in the paper discussion.
(2)
Saturn moves a distance =90000 million km in a period = 107470 days
The period 107470 days (of Saturn) = 576 x 186.6 days (Of Mercury)
Means this period (107470 days) be seen on Mercury as (186.6 days)
(3)
The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec –
This total be created relative to the point of space on which the sun will be created –
Means
We suppose the sun isn't found and the planets still revolve around the point of space on which the sun will be created-
Mercury (47.4 km/s) revolves around this point of space and creates a different in velocity with it = (47.4km/s)
Venus (35 km/s) revolves around this point and creates a different in velocity = 47.4km/s + 35km/s =82.4 km/s
The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s causes to create a different velocity =176 km/s with this point of space
Now
The rate of time be created based on the rate of velocities –means
1day of this point of Space be =176 days of Mercury
(Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s)
But
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = 1.0725 days of the point of space
We know the rate (1.0725) effect on the solar system – for example – this rate effect on 40% of all distances and 60% 0f all planets axial tilts and effect on many other data-
By this rate (1.0725) the period (1.0725 days) will be = one day
Means
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space
But
The solar system creation theory tells– the planets matters and their distances be created from one energy and this energy be provided by one light beam and the planets move with this light beam based on the rate of time (One Second of Light motion be = One Solar day of Planet Motion)
This must be the same rate be used with the space because the matter and space be created together.
As a result
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space =one second of light motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Life Depends On A Cycle.pdf
Paper hypothesis
(1)
The Sun Rays Be Produced By Planets Velocities Total - The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Light (300000 km/sec) travels in one solar day a distance = the solar planets motions distances total in 1461 solar days–
The solar planets velocities total uses this rate of time (1=1461) and produces light velocity (300000 km/sec) from the planets velocities total
(2)
If the solar planets motions can't produce light velocity the solar system would be destroyed.
Paper conclusion
Because the sun rays energy be provided by the planets motions energies total and the planets move in cycles – that necessitates – the sun creation and death depend on a cycle –means- after this sun be dead another sun will be created because the sun is a phenomenon created based on a cycle (as the eclipse)
The hypothesis explanation
(1)
The Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Energy -
This idea can be acceptable simply by the physics book because it's known that the matter and space be created of energies – here – I add one idea only tells that-from the same one energy the planets matters and their distances be created –
The matter and space have different forms spite they be created from the same energy because the creation rules be different for them- as the oil and coal - they be created from the same source but the creation rules be different and the forms be different as a result
The idea causes basic change in the solar system motion description–because –instead of the separated planets as separated points – we deal with one energy which causes to create a continuum of data – by that –the data can be transported among the planets (in fact it does).
The idea doesn't create any new thing– but – it discovers the unjustifiable description for the planets motions – where it be believed that the planets are separated from one another as islands in a sea and no connection can be available – this description is mistaken in concept because the matter is created of energy and the space is created of energy and it's illogical to prevent the contact between them -here – the transportation of data among the planets should be a proved fact depend on the planets motions.
Shortly
The continuum of data of the solar system is a logical fact should be proved, and the separated points description should be considered unjustifiable vision.
A Conclusion
From one energy the planets matters and their distances be created
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is A Phenomenon.pdf
The Sun Is A Phenomenon
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets velocities total be equivalent to light velocity 300000 km/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions –
- Means-
- The Sun Rays Energy Source Isn't Any Nuclear Interaction Found Inside The Sun – But – The Sun Rays Energy Be Found By The Planets Motions Energies Total
- Shortly
- The Planets Velocities Total Be Used As One Motion Velocity – And This Motion Uses A Rate Of Time To Reach To Light Velocity.
- Let's explain that in details in following…
- (1)
- We need to suppose that (One Hour Of Mercury Motion =24 Hours Of Any Planet Motion) and
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Solar Days Of Saturn Motion)
- These rates of time be proved in the discussion clearly –
- (2)
- The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec – this value be seen in Mercury Data as (176 solar days = Mercury Day Period)
- We conclude that, Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s
- And
- After The Earth Moon Creation, the moon velocity 29.8 km/sec be added to the 9 planets velocities total (176 +29.8 =205.8 km/s)
- The total 205.8 km/s be seen in the moon motion data as (205.8 x π =655.7) (error 1.4%) where (655.7 hours = the moon rotation period)
- That tells the velocities total be seen also in the moon rotation period (a cycle period as Mercury)
- But
- Why for Mercury used (DAYS) but for the moon used (HOURS)??
- Because
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Hours Of The Moon Motion)
- (3)
- The total (205.8 km/s) can create the velocity 300000 km/s only if the rate of time (1=1461) be created – let's see the light velocity creation -
- 300000 km = 205.8s x 9.7 km/s x 24 x 2π
- Let's explain how the light velocity (300000 km/s) be created.
- The planets velocities total (205.8km/s) moves for 1second and passes 205.8 km, this distance be sent from the moon to Saturn in a period form (205.8 seconds)
- But (one hour of any planet motion = 24 hours of Saturn motion) for that reason the period (205.8 s of the moon motion) be equal = (205.8 s x 24) of Saturn motion.
- The rate (2π) be found by the geometrical design
- The data tells, each second Saturn moves, passes a distance =9.7 km but the solar system passes a distance =300000 km
- If the solar system moves (one motion) and uses (one velocity) for this distance (300000 km) for each second - The Solar System Velocity Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) – means – The Planets Velocities Total Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdf
Please help (1-9-2022)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022)
National bank of Egypt practice Fraud and Breach of Trust
Because
It refused the judgment issued by The French ministry of Justice and denies the money by judged and disregarded the Foreign Court Judgment.
Sent to the honorable united Nations Secretary – General
António Guterres
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
The Sun Creation Process.pdf
best Greetings
The Sun Creation Process
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Light Beam Energy The Solar System Be Created
And
This Light Beam travels with 1.16 million km per second
The hypothesis explanation..
- (1)
- The solar system be created out of one light beam energy –
- The solar planets matters and their distances be created of one energy and this one energy be provided by one light beam and this light beam travels with velocity 1160000 km/s –
- Shortly
- The physics book accepts that (matter and space be created of energies)
- The hypothesis adds one idea only tells
- (from the same one energy the solar planets matters and their distances be created) this is the hypothesis main idea –
- Matter and Space creation be done from the same stuff (energy) but by using different geometrical rules –the idea is similar to the creation of the oil and coal both be created from the same source but they have 2 different forms because the creation process depend on 2 different geometrical rules.
- The matter and space creation process can be summarized by the following data
- (light 1.16 million/s = matter + space + light 300000 km/s)
- The data tells the input energy be a light beam its velocity 1160000 km/s, from this energy the matter and space be created and the light known velocity 300000 km/s be created as a side product from the process.
- Briefly
- If we find Matters in the universe – we can't find the light velocity 1160000 km/s because its energy be consumed in the matter and space creation process and produced the known light beam velocity 300000 km/s as a side product.
- Based on this vision
- The matter be a geometrical point found on a trajectory of energy or (on a light beam) – by that – the matter moves by light motion –
- Imagine a rock in a tube form be found in some sea water and the water passes through this rock tube and pushes the rock itself to move with the water-
- That answers the question (how does planet move?) no sun gravity be used here – instead – the planet moves by light motion from its energy the planet be created.
- Here we disprove Newton theory of the sun gravity – because
- By one force the planet be created and moving otherwise this planet will be broken by effect of 2 forces on it – here – the force caused the planet creation is the light beam energy and the force causes the planet motion is this same light beam motion- that explains the safe planet motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Planet Diameter Equation Analysis.pdf
Paper hypothesis
Venus motion effect on the moon motion and causes the moon orbital period to be = the moon rotation period =27.3 days
The hypothesis explanation..
- The hypothesis explanation can be summarized in 3 questions:
- (1) Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (2) By What Equation Planet Diameter Can Be Defined?
- (3) How Can Planet Diameter Equation Change The Solar System Vision?
- Let's try to answer these questions in following…
(1st Question)
Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane or rocket manufacture – the manufacturer needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all specifications, otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period, axial tilt …and all data based on Exact Equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically without observation which prove this fact decisively.
- Then we have to ask (How Planet Data Be Created In Order?)
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves this fact – because – it proves each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2=4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orbital distance
- Example (Venus orbital distance)2= 4 (Mercury orbital distance) x50.3 million km (Venus orbital distance=108.2 million km Mercury orbital distance =57.9 million km)
- This equation be tested and discussed in this paper – but its concept is a clear one – it tells the planets leave an empty space for the new planet – for that reason each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance.
- Logically the new planet can't disturb the current planets positions or motions trajectories – by that –the orbital distance be defined by the neighbors positions –
- (3)
- The new planet has to revolve around the sun based on its orbital distance which be defined obligatorily where no data of this planet be taken into consideration in its orbital distance definition –neither mass nor diameter – instead – the distance be defined based on the neighbor distance.
- But
- Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance – otherwise – this planet will be broken through its motion –
- The function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is the necessary requirement to cause the planet safe motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdf
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
2013-2022: Egypt authority prevented any job from me and prevented me to travel abroad- They Torture My Mother By Electric Shock And Try To Kill Her By Insulin Injection- they threaten our lives –Please Help
2010-2013: I have studied in Faculty of physics & Math– Physics Department – Peoples Friendship University of Russia – Moscow – Russian Federation.
2013-2022 (Details) - Because I couldn't return to Moscow - I have performed an interesting research in astrophysics- many international physicists interested for it – while Egypt authority realized my research importance they:
(I) torture my mother by electric shocks to force me stop publishing my papers
(II) They practice hacking on my accounts & Telephone Calls (+201022532292).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdf
Please help
Egypt Authority Persecutes The Coptic -Please Help
EGYPT AUTHORITY TRIES TO KILL MY MOTHER – PLEASE HELP
(Also they force my family to send me to the madhouse)
Because
Egypt Authority tries to STEAL my astrophysics research results, I worked in it since 2013 till now –Egypt authority torture us to steal my research – they hanged many of my accounts and even prevent me to write my research papers by using torture.
(They try to burn my laptop- which is my only source for all my research materials)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
Address /11 Mohamed Rageb st- Madenet El Saada – EL Materiya District – Cairo – Egypt
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation Period
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Diameter Be Created As A Function In Its Rotation Period
The hypothesis Explanation
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane manufacture – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight …etc otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its data based on exact equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically prove this fact decisively.
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves each planet orbital distance depends on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2 = 4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orb. distance
- We test and discuss this equation in the current paper–
- As a result –
- The planet found itself in an obligatory position be defined by other planets data and the planet data itself has no role in its orbital distance definition.
- (3)
- Planet motion can be a dangerous one if this planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance – means- the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken (The mass can decrease planet velocity – but the wrong diameter can break it) – for that reason – the planet has to create its diameter as a function in its orbital distance to move safely.
- But
- If the function has only 2 variables (planet diameter and its orbital distance), If this planet changes its orbital distance for any reason its diameter will be broken as a result –
- The designer had to create the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance as indirect function contains many other variables and by that if the planet changes its orbital distance the other variables will be changed but the diameter will be saved.
- As a result
- Planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance – by that – the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance be created but contains also other variables to protect the diameter.
- My fourth equation proves this fact let's see it
- (4)
- Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
- (v1/v2) = (s/r) =I
- v = Planet Velocity
- r= Planet Diameter
- s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
- I= Planet Orbital Inclination (a rate to inclination unit)
- v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
- we test, discuss and analyze this equation in this current paper.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
-Physics and Mathematics Faculty - Peoples' Friendship university of Russia –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae).pdf
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae)
My Research Argument
(Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?)
1-Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – All planet data be created based on exact equations and geometrical rules - No single data be created based on random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
As in a plane or a rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all its specifications and dimensions –
If this plane data be created by inaccurate dimensions, this plane can't fly
Similar to that
Planet moves through the space under physical laws and if its data be not created based on exact equations this planet will be broken through its motion – because – the safe motion necessitates a full harmony between planet data one another and with the physical laws controls the motions through space
In this investigation we try to define how Planet creates its data – or in more accurate words – By What Order Planet Data Be Created? what data be created at first and what be later? – by that – we can discover the harmony original point.
I have discovered 5 equations by which we can conclude planet data theoretically without observation that proves the idea decisively
2- Planet Orbital Distance Be Defined Before Its Creation
This simple fact be proved by 2 basic proves – "First Proof" The Logical Analysis
The current planets positions define the new planet position
The balancing effect of the planets motions forces the new planet to take the left place for it – because the planets revolve around the sun in their trajectories of motions – for that – the new planet has to find a place far from these trajectories.
Imagine you are in some crowded bus – the people pushed you to the last place in this bus because it's the only free place there – you came later and this is the only available place for you – by that – you are forced to accept this place
Planet orbital distance be defined before the planet creation – the logic proves this fact clearly
"Second Proof"
My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
My equation tells– Planet Orbital Distance Depends On Its Neighbor Distance
It's a simple and a trustee equation – let's use Venus as example
(108.2 million km)2 = 4 (57.9 million km) (50.3 million km)
where
108.2 million km = Venus orbital distance and
57.9 million km = Mercury orbital distance and (50.3 = 108.2 -57.9)
(There are 3 exceptions – Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus and Pluto depends on Uranus –
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdf
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
- (1)
- By one force planet be created and moving – means - the force which created the Planet– it causes its motion – as a result
- (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) because (The Sun Had Created No Planet)
- One more force caused the planets creation and their motions
- For that reason
- Planet creation and motion data be in harmony one another –
- For example (Mercury creation and motion data be in harmony one another) and Mercury moves safely and isn't broken
- But -we don't have 9 forces in the solar system – One force for each planet – instead – We have one force only caused All Planets Creation And Motion
- Now- let's ask
- How Can One Force Create 9 Planets And Causes Their Motions?
- This force needs to use One Geometrical Design to do this job – as 9 gears be moving by one motor we need a machine to do this job
- Based on this analysis – No planet moves by the sun gravity – Newton is wrong
- (2)
- The gravitation equation is wrong because no planet orbital distance be defined based on it- and that explains the contradiction between the planets masses order and their orbital distances
- This fact is a powerful against Newton – but the logic still more power
- Because
- The planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation – because – the distance be defined by other planets distances – means - the new planet orbital distance be defined based on the balancing of the current planets motions trajectories and by that the new planet will find itself in a position defined obligatory by other planets –
- This fact be proved also by my first equation which proves that each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance (Not On Its Mass)
- My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
- d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
- (My 5 Equations Be Tested And Discussed In The Paper)
- I want to say
- The principle idea is wrong because the distance be defined obligatory by other planets motions trajectories and planet mass can do nothing to change it
- (3)
- The logic still moves against Newton because
- The planet is found itself in an obligatory position and has to revolve around the sun from this position – now what about this planet diameter – because
- If the planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance this planet will be broken – here – Newton idea is wrong completely because he looked at the mass but planet mass can decrease its velocity where the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken – by that – the planet has to create a function between its orbital distance and its diameter to move safely otherwise it will be broken – the point is Newton defined the mass as the basic player! (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdf
The document discusses Kepler's law that a planet's orbit defines its velocity. It provides 5 points to explain this: 1) Planet data is based on exact equations, not random factors. 2) A planet's diameter should be indirectly related to its orbital distance to avoid breaking during motion. 3) A planet's mass affects its orbital inclination and limits variables in diameter equations. 4) A function is needed between a planet's orbit and velocity to connect variables like rotation period. 5) Newton's gravity theory and the Big Bang theory are incorrect because planet data requires exact geometrical rules, not chaos. The document aims to show planetary motions result from one precise geometrical design, not random forces.
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers).pdf
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper answers the following questions
1. Can each planet orbital distance depend on its neighbor planet orbital distance? In this case how the distance between the sun and Pluto be created? (Can One Map Be Drawn For All Planets Orbital Distances?)
2. Is There a necessity to create a proportionality between planet diameter and orbital distance?
3. Can Planet rotation period be defined based on its velocity?
4. Correct The wrong sentence (Planet Diameter Should Be A Direct Function In Its Orbital Distance And By That This Planet Will Not Be Broken Through Its Motion?)
5. Why Does Venus Have The Longest Rotation Period In The Solar System?
6. Can Planet orbital Distance be Defined before this planet creation? where planet orbital distance be defined based on its neighbor orbital distance?
7. Why Doesn't The Planet Break After Its Creation?
8. Planet data be (Mass – Diameter- Orbital Distance- Period –Inclination….etc) what data be created at first and what be created later?
9. Explain The Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
10. Why does the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period (No For Tidal Locking – this idea is wrong)?
11. Can The Planets Velocities Total Be Defined At First And Each Planet Velocity Be A Function In This Total?
12- Can Solar System Depend On One Geometrical Design?
13- Why Does The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 km?
14- Can Mars Orbital Distance Be Changed From 84 million km to 228 million km?
15- Did Newton realize The Solar system Motion Logic?
16- How Be The Sun Disc Created?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdf
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument
The planets motions can be explained only based on the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System)
The Argument explanation
The solar planets are created complementary one another and their motions be integrated into one unified motion – by that- the planets be similar to members of one creature - Their creation data depends on one design and their motions be integrated together into one unified motion (as a machine of gears – many gears motions but the machine produces One Unified Motion)
Because of that
Any planet motion can be explained only through the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System), because based on this one design the planets be created and by this one design the planets motions be integrated and produced one unified motion.
Paper objective
- We have proved the one geometrical design before
- In this current paper we examine the one geometrical design details – by that the paper provides rich points of discussion because we discuss the geometrical details of this one design and their effects on the planets creation and motion data.
- The paper discussions points be summarized in following:
- (1)
- The paper proves the one design uses one map for the distance - means
- The solar system design uses the distance from the sun to Pluto as one piece of distance be distributed based on one map –
- (2)
- The paper proves the solar system design uses one more map for the velocities. by that, the design considers the planets motions be integrated into one unified motion as a machine of gears and this (unified velocity) be distributed for the planets velocities based on one more map.
- (3)
- The paper answers the question (why does the design use 2 different maps?) and explains the massive importance for this using
- The paper analyzes also my fourth equation to prove that – planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be created a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance.
- (4)
- The paper disproves the tidal locking claim as a reason for the moon cycles periods equality – the idea is wrong – where – the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period because of the solar system one design effect on the moon motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Dancing Planets.pdf
The Dancing Planets
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Energy The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created
The hypothesis explanation
- (1)
- Newton Theory of the sun gravity is wrong in its logic because by one force the planet should be created and moving –otherwise this planet will be broken -means- The force which created the planet it causes its motion – by that no planet moves by the sun gravity
- (2)
- The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong Because – It Supposed – The First Energy Was In A Chaos Form Resulting From The First Explosion – in Fact – The First Energy (Of The Solar System) was in A Geometrical Design Form.
- (3)
- The physics book accepts (Matter and Space be Created Of Energies) – The paper hypothesis adds one idea tells (From One Energy They Were Created) – means - The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy
- Let's see the paper basic ideas in following
- (A)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations- As any plane or rocket creation – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width and All Other Specifications-
- Similar to that,
- Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, period, velocity, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – all data be created based on exact equations and no data be created by any random process, initial conditions or historical unknown factors.
- By that, the planets data can be concluded by mathematical calculations only
- My 5 equations prove this fact (The 5 equations be tested in point no. 3)
- (B)
- The Planet data Exact equations depend on One Geometrical Design –means-
- Because the solar system creation and motion depends on One Geometrical Design, the planets data be created based on exact equations
- The One Geometrical Design is the basic argument of the paper –
- It's similar to the electron and positron be created from Gamma ray (The double production experiment), The 2 particles charges total be (Zero) because gamma ray charge is (Zero)
- By that, one law controls the 2 particles motions – and similar to that – one law or One Geometrical Design controls the solar planets creations and motions
- Also, from Planet motion analysis- we can reach to this same conclusion
- We accept that, one force only be used for planet creation and motion, and the force which created the planet causes its motion –otherwise this planet will be broken because 2 forces effect on it- but
- We don't have 9 forces create the 9 solar planets and cause their motions – instead- we have only one force causes all planets creation and motion –
- This one force can do this job only by using One Geometrical Design -
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Planet Diameter Definition Equation.pdf
Planet Diameter Definition Equation
Abstract
Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
(v1/v2) = (s/r) = I
v = Planet Velocity
r= Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination
v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
The Equation Role
- The equation proves that, Planet diameter be created based on geometrical rule and as a function in this planet motion data –
- That tells, the motion was found and defined before this planet creation and for that the planet diameter be created depending on this planet motion data
The Equation Significance
- The Equation proves the argument
- By One Force The Solar Planets Be Created And Moving
- The sun didn't cause any planet creation, So (No planet moves by the sun gravity)
- By One Force and From One Energy All Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created And This Energy Causes The Planets Motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Geometry Of Light Motion.pdf
Geometry Of Light Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy.
- This one energy is provided by one light beam
- This light beam travels with a velocity =1.16 million km per second
Paper objective
- The paper is consisted of 2 parts
- Part no. (I) provides My Research Presentation Summary
- Part no. (II) discusses The Geometry Of Light Motion
- Let's refer to them in following..
Part No. (I) Research Presentation Summary
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
(No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation And Using to prove 2 basic new discoveries which are:
(Mars Migration Theory) and
(The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Part No. (II) Geometry Of Light Motion
What's the direct question behind this paper?
The matter and space are created from one light beam – means – the matter and space are forms of light forms –
Now, if this is a fact,
Why do we need to fight so hard to prove this very simple and clear fact?
Because
The light uses unknown geometrical rules –
By that this paper should be similar to a book of Geometry – because – it shows types of geometrical rules are unknown for us and not found in our Geometry books
It's a direct answer but not clear
Why don't we know these rules? Why can't we catch them in lab experiments? If so many unknown geometrical rules of light motion are found, and we couldn't catch them during the empirical physics history why can we do that now? Can any one stole at end the Geometry book from the heaven library?!
I have brought with me the planets data and later I have discovered that all unknown geometrical rules be hidden in them.
Shortly
The light creates the matter and space by using unknown geometrical rules – and – we can discover these geometrical rules by using planets data analysis – means – we can know these geometrical rules only if we can read correctly the planets data – for example – if we can answer the question (why the moon diameter =3475 km?) that will help us to discover the rules based on which the moon diameter be created.
So I will present my research summary then we should discuss these unknown geometrical rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
More from Gerges francis (20)
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdf
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdf
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdf
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdf
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdf
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdf
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdf
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdf
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdf
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdf
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation Period
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation Period
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdf
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdf
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdf
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdf
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdf
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdf
Recently uploaded
Compexometric titration/Chelatorphy titration/chelating titration
Classification
Metal ion ion indicators
Masking and demasking reagents
Estimation of Magnisium sulphate
Calcium gluconate
Complexometric Titration/ chelatometry titration/chelating titration, introduction, Types-
1.Direct Titration
2.Back Titration
3.Replacement Titration
4.Indirect Titration
Masking agent, Demasking agents
formation of complex
comparition between masking and demasking agents,
Indicators/Metal ion indicators/ Metallochromic indicators/pM indicators,
Visual Technique,PM indicators (metallochromic), Indicators of pH, Redox Indicators
Instrumental Techniques-Photometry
Potentiometry
Miscellaneous methods.
Complex titration with EDTA.
The cost of acquiring information by natural selection
This is a short talk that I gave at the Banff International Research Station workshop on Modeling and Theory in Population Biology. The idea is to try to understand how the burden of natural selection relates to the amount of information that selection puts into the genome.
It's based on the first part of this research paper:
The cost of information acquisition by natural selection
Ryan Seamus McGee, Olivia Kosterlitz, Artem Kaznatcheev, Benjamin Kerr, Carl T. Bergstrom
bioRxiv 2022.07.02.498577; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.02.498577
在线办理(salfor毕业证书)索尔福德大学毕业证毕业完成信一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(salfor毕业证书)索尔福德大学毕业证》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
快速办理(UAM毕业证书)马德里自治大学毕业证学位证一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(UAM毕业证书)马德里自治大学毕业证学位证》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Describing and Interpreting an Immersive Learning Case with the Immersion Cub...
Current descriptions of immersive learning cases are often difficult or impossible to compare. This is due to a myriad of different options on what details to include, which aspects are relevant, and on the descriptive approaches employed. Also, these aspects often combine very specific details with more general guidelines or indicate intents and rationales without clarifying their implementation. In this paper we provide a method to describe immersive learning cases that is structured to enable comparisons, yet flexible enough to allow researchers and practitioners to decide which aspects to include. This method leverages a taxonomy that classifies educational aspects at three levels (uses, practices, and strategies) and then utilizes two frameworks, the Immersive Learning Brain and the Immersion Cube, to enable a structured description and interpretation of immersive learning cases. The method is then demonstrated on a published immersive learning case on training for wind turbine maintenance using virtual reality. Applying the method results in a structured artifact, the Immersive Learning Case Sheet, that tags the case with its proximal uses, practices, and strategies, and refines the free text case description to ensure that matching details are included. This contribution is thus a case description method in support of future comparative research of immersive learning cases. We then discuss how the resulting description and interpretation can be leveraged to change immersion learning cases, by enriching them (considering low-effort changes or additions) or innovating (exploring more challenging avenues of transformation). The method holds significant promise to support better-grounded research in immersive learning.
11.1 Role of physical biological in deterioration of grains.pdf
Storagedeteriorationisanyformoflossinquantityandqualityofbio-materials.
Themajorcausesofdeteriorationinstorage
•Physical
•Biological
•Mechanical
•Chemical
Storageonlypreservesquality.Itneverimprovesquality.
Itisadvisabletostartstoragewithqualityfoodproduct.Productwithinitialpoorqualityquicklydepreciates
Sexuality - Issues, Attitude and Behaviour - Applied Social Psychology - Psyc...
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
Micronuclei test.M.sc.zoology.fisheries.
Current Ms word generated power point presentation covers major details about the micronuclei test. It's significance and assays to conduct it. It is used to detect the micronuclei formation inside the cells of nearly every multicellular organism. It's formation takes place during chromosomal sepration at metaphase.
Applied Science: Thermodynamics, Laws & Methodology.pdf
When I was asked to give a companion lecture in support of ‘The Philosophy of Science’ (https://shorturl.at/4pUXz) I decided not to walk through the detail of the many methodologies in order of use. Instead, I chose to employ a long standing, and ongoing, scientific development as an exemplar. And so, I chose the ever evolving story of Thermodynamics as a scientific investigation at its best.
Conducted over a period of >200 years, Thermodynamics R&D, and application, benefitted from the highest levels of professionalism, collaboration, and technical thoroughness. New layers of application, methodology, and practice were made possible by the progressive advance of technology. In turn, this has seen measurement and modelling accuracy continually improved at a micro and macro level.
Perhaps most importantly, Thermodynamics rapidly became a primary tool in the advance of applied science/engineering/technology, spanning micro-tech, to aerospace and cosmology. I can think of no better a story to illustrate the breadth of scientific methodologies and applications at their best.
The binding of cosmological structures by massless topological defects
Assuming spherical symmetry and weak field, it is shown that if one solves the Poisson equation or the Einstein field
equations sourced by a topological defect, i.e. a singularity of a very specific form, the result is a localized gravitational
field capable of driving flat rotation (i.e. Keplerian circular orbits at a constant speed for all radii) of test masses on a thin
spherical shell without any underlying mass. Moreover, a large-scale structure which exploits this solution by assembling
concentrically a number of such topological defects can establish a flat stellar or galactic rotation curve, and can also deflect
light in the same manner as an equipotential (isothermal) sphere. Thus, the need for dark matter or modified gravity theory is
mitigated, at least in part.
waterlessdyeingtechnolgyusing carbon dioxide chemicalspdf
The technology uses reclaimed CO₂ as the dyeing medium in a closed loop process. When pressurized, CO₂ becomes supercritical (SC-CO₂). In this state CO₂ has a very high solvent power, allowing the dye to dissolve easily.
Direct Seeded Rice - Climate Smart Agriculture
Direct Seeded Rice - Climate Smart AgricultureInternational Food Policy Research Institute- South Asia Office
PPT on Direct Seeded Rice presented at the three-day 'Training and Validation Workshop on Modules of Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) Technologies in South Asia' workshop on April 22, 2024.
Farming systems analysis: what have we learnt?.pptx
Presentation given at the official farewell of Prof Ken Gillet at Wageningen on 13 June 2024
Recently uploaded (20)
Compexometric titration/Chelatorphy titration/chelating titration
Compexometric titration/Chelatorphy titration/chelating titration
The cost of acquiring information by natural selection
The cost of acquiring information by natural selection
GBSN - Biochemistry (Unit 6) Chemistry of Proteins
GBSN - Biochemistry (Unit 6) Chemistry of Proteins
Basics of crystallography, crystal systems, classes and different forms
Basics of crystallography, crystal systems, classes and different forms
Describing and Interpreting an Immersive Learning Case with the Immersion Cub...
Describing and Interpreting an Immersive Learning Case with the Immersion Cub...
11.1 Role of physical biological in deterioration of grains.pdf
11.1 Role of physical biological in deterioration of grains.pdf
Sexuality - Issues, Attitude and Behaviour - Applied Social Psychology - Psyc...
Sexuality - Issues, Attitude and Behaviour - Applied Social Psychology - Psyc...
aziz sancar nobel prize winner: from mardin to nobel
aziz sancar nobel prize winner: from mardin to nobel
Applied Science: Thermodynamics, Laws & Methodology.pdf
Applied Science: Thermodynamics, Laws & Methodology.pdf
The binding of cosmological structures by massless topological defects
The binding of cosmological structures by massless topological defects
waterlessdyeingtechnolgyusing carbon dioxide chemicalspdf
waterlessdyeingtechnolgyusing carbon dioxide chemicalspdf
Farming systems analysis: what have we learnt?.pptx
Farming systems analysis: what have we learnt?.pptx
The observer effect on the observation results (space = energy=mc2)
- 1. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawadrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 1 The Observer Effect On The Observation Results (Space = Energy=mc2 ) By Gerges Francis Twadrous 2nd course student – Physics Department - Physics & Math Faculty – Peoples' Friendship University – Moscow – Russia -2010-2013 TEL +201022532292 georgytawdrous@yandex.ru / mrwaheid@gmail.com The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo – Egypt – 22nd October 2018 Abstract The Universe Matter is effected by Human Mind Thinking Process and the knowledge logic. 1-Introduction One question only I have discussed in all my papers … Let's write example of it in following … Saturn Diameter = Venus Diameter x π2 (error 0.8%) Is this relationship is found by pure coincidence or by a geometrical reason? Of course the question isn't related to Saturn and Venus only…. But this relationship is an example of thousands of relationships I have provided in my papers… Let's write another example: 1. Earth Moon Distance at Perigee point =363000 km = Solar Outer Planets Diameters Total (error 1%) 2. Earth Moon Distance at Apogee point =406000 km = Solar Planets Diameters Total 3. The Distance between Perigee and Apogee = 40000km = Inner Solar Planets Diameters Total = Earth Circumference. 4. Earth daily motion = The moon orbit circumference at apogee radius (r=406000 km) 5. Saturn Circumference = Earth Moon Distance at total solar eclipse radius (r=377000km) 6. Note Please/ Solar Planets Diameters Total= 2 Jupiter diameters + 1 Saturn diameter Is there a geometrical reason behind the previous data or found only by pure coincidences? This was my first question… Let's ask the second one now….. Why there are huge number of relationships (pure coincidences) in the solar group data? To explain this question as possible let's discuss one more relationship in following Example Planet diameter and orbital distance relationship… I concluded that there's a relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance because I found many data supports this direction…. For example Mercury orbital distance = Mercury diameter x 1092 …. And this equation is working also for Earth and Saturn perfectly… I can't suppose that's found by pure coincidences… but I concluded that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance… But let's see the following……
- 2. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawadrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 2 Moon & Sun Angular Diameters Moon Diameter angle between these 2 light beams γ= 0.5 degree (The real value is γ=0.532 degree, we learnt that from the total solar eclipse) Now let's think γ=0.532 degree expresses the moon diameter 3475 km 360 degrees expresses what?? nce)CircumfereOrbit(Moon8.2351503)(3475 532.0 360 mkmDiameterMoon (Error 2.5%) Vision angle defines moon diameter and his orbital circumference! Why? let's see if this also real with the sun diameter The Sun Diameter γ=0.532 degree expresses the sun diameter 1.392 million km 360 degrees expresses what?? error)no-nceCircumfereOrbit(Earth940)(392.1 532.0 360 mkmDiameterSunmkm I found it's hard to consider both results as pure coincidences… The Discussion The vision angle defines the planet diameter and orbital circumference! Why? It's easy to claim that is just pure coincidences … But the huge number of relationships which we have found in the solar planets data prevent us from such naïve answer… What I try to suggest is…. The human mind is a player in the solar group geometrical structure…. i.e. The human mind realization process effects on the solar group vision… i.e. The solar group geometrical structure realization is an interactive process in which the human mind is player as much as any other geometrical component…. This paper discusses 2 points The observer effect on the observation results Earth Jupiter distance = Energy (More Data and Discussion) 2- Methodology I use the same method in all my researches, The Planet Data Analysis… Let's explain the idea here again In Pythagoras triangle we found that a2 + b2 = c2 , this rule we can conclude from the triangle data if its dimensions are 3, 4 and 5… so the data may show the geometrical rules….similar to that, I use the solar planets data analysis to conclude the main geometrical rules which explain the solar planets origin and motion…
- 3. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawadrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 3 3- The observer effect on the observation results 3-1 The observer Effects on the Observation Results 3-2 Matter Creation Process 3-3 Is the matter created by Young or Anderson experiments? 3-1 The observer Effects on the Observation Results In one quantized experiment, the researcher told us that, particle is found just after he measured it! means particle wasn’t found before the measurement! why? Because before the measurement, the particle is in possibility to be particle or wave but after measurement the particle becomes known as particle… Now let's imagine this particle is electron…. Also let's suppose that, all electrons are produced only with positrons from Gamma rays (1.2 Mev) by Anderson experiment (double production)… What result we may reach from that? When the researcher measures the particle and the particle is found after this measurement, where this particle is electron …. That will necessitate to conclude there's a positron in somewhere as a result of this process… i.e. The measurement of one particle leads to produce 2 particles because they are produced together… Now we can see there's an effect of human mind on the matter creation process… Where this effect is variable from one particle to another….. for the measured particle (electron) the mind effect was direct effect but for the positron the effect was indirect…. The previous example is good material to consider the human mind effect on the universe around us…. 3-2 Matter Creation Process In my theory of Matter Creation I claimed that - Two light beams got coherence together and this coherence produced bright fringes and dark fringes …. - We see the bright fringes as matters and the dark fringes as distances (space) - This description depends on Young Experiment (Double Slit Experiment) The previous hypothesis is my theory hypothesis…. But why we see the bright fringes as matters? - Special theory of relativity tells us, we see the light beam because the light travels with c velocity relative to us…. If we and the light travel by the same velocity so we would see the light beam as matter (because no difference in velocity) - In our mind there's an electromagnetic waves (travel with c velocity)… - That means the electromagnetic waves in our mind travel by the same velocity of Light beams which causes our mind to see the light beams as matters…
- 4. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawadrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 4 - That explains the relationship between the matter and knowledge which had been discovered from very long time (ancient Greek). Please review My theory of Matter creation in the following paper Solar Group Geometrical Structure http://vixra.org/abs/1805.0081 and also (Earth moves with the light velocity relative to the sun" http://vixra.org/abs/1709.0331) Note please The actual velocity of electric pulses through human nerves is very slow comparing to light velocity, but we know that the light velocity in liquid is less than in vacuum. So the electromagnetic waves (light) is found in human mind but pass through his liquids with lower velocity, and if there's any space (vacuum) inside the human brain the light will restore his velocity. (full mechanism needs a medical examination, in addition to a definition for "Vacuum") 3-3 Is the matter created by young or Anderson experiments? I have suggested that, the matter is produced as bright fringes from Young Experiment and produced also as electron and position from Gamma rays (1.2 Mev) …! 2 ways to create the same matter! So what idea is the correct one? I tried frequently to explain that, the solar group geometrical rules are beyond our Geometry and Physics books… and there are many new rules we need to learn to understand the solar group clearly as possible… In my opinion, all these are features of the same geometrical structure…. There's a way to connect young experiment with Anderson experiment to produce the matter from the light beams (Gamma rays for example)…. I still search for this way
- 5. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawadrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 5 4- Earth Jupiter distance = Energy (the meaning and proves) I-Data 1- 6939.75 seconds x c2 = 627 million km 2- 1898 x 0.33 = 627 102 x 5.97 = 627 3- 627 = (25.04)2 (25.2 degrees = Mars Axial Tilt) 4- 627 = 23.4 degree (Earth axial tilt) x 26.7 degrees (Saturn axial tilt) 5- 627 mkm= 778.6 mkm (Jupiter orbital Distance) x 0.8 degree (Uranus orbital inclination) 6- 627 = 5.1 degree (moon orbital inclination) x 122.5 degrees ( Pluto axial tilt) 7- 627 mkm = Neptune Diameter x Earth Diameter 8- 627 mkm x 99% = Uranus Diameter x Venus Diameter= Earth Circumference x Mercury Circumference. II- Discussion Equations No. 1 and 2 I have discussed in details in my previous paper Definition of Space (revised) http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0307 let's start with Equation No. 3 4-1 Earth Jupiter Distance The previous data shows how Earth Jupiter distance is very specific in the solar group, for that reason this distance is consisted by most specific data in the solar group let's see that in following…. Equation No.3 627 mkm (Earth Jupiter distance) = (25.04)2 (25.2 degrees = Mars Axial Tilt) We know that 1 mkm =1 degree….based on that Equation no.3 is consistent one… I wish the reader sees how this distance is specific where Mars axial tilt 25.2 degrees is its main component…. I wish you remember that Mars axial tilt 25.2 is the constant in kepler 3rd law application on the solar planets data…. Kepler 3rd Law Explanation (a Claim Against Nobel Prize Board Decision in Physics 2018) http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0053 Equation No.4 627 mkm = 23.4 degree (Earth axial tilt) x 26.7 degrees (Saturn axial tilt) I hope the distance consistency is clear before our eyes…. By many different important data we can reach to the same distance…. It's hard to consider all data as just pure coincidences
- 6. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawadrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 6 Equation No.5 627 mkm= 778.6 mkm (Jupiter orbital Distance) x 0.8 degree (Uranus orbital inclination) The previous Equation tells us important information…. Earth defines her distance to Jupiter according to the relationship between Uranus and Jupiter… I wish we remember that, the relationship between Jupiter and Uranus was the base on which the sun is created as we have discussed before in my previous paper The Sun Data shows Relativistic Effects (revised) http://vixra.org/abs/1806.0209 Equation No.7 627 mkm = Neptune Diameter x Earth Diameter Equation no.7 tells us that the similarity of Masses distribution rates between Earth and Neptune didn't produce by pure coincidence but by a geometrical reason which causes more relationships as this one… I wish it's clear before our eyes that, there's a geometrical structure behind all solar planets data where no single data is created independently…. Equation No.8 627 mkm x 99% = Uranus Diameter x Venus Diameter= Earth Circumference x Mercury Circumference. We know the rate 99% perfectly which we have discussed frequently… The previous equation tells that, the relationship between Earth and Neptune has effect extended beyond the 2 planets…. Author Other Papers Definition of Space (Revised) http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0307 Does The Moon move by Gravity? http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0089 Kepler 3rd Law Explanation (a Claim Against Nobel Prize Board Decision in Physics 2018) http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0053 Metonic and Saros Cycles Harmony Reason http://vixra.org/abs/1809.0559 The Solar Group Main Equation (Part 2) http://vixra.org/abs/1809.0468 The Solar Group Main Equation http://vixra.org/abs/1809.0186 Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292 E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1 Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous All papers https://www.slideshare.net/search/slideshow?searchfrom=header&q=gerges+francis+papers+