The Medicare Bill

The Medicare Bill
The Medicare bill was signed into law on July 30, 1965 by President Johnson. The signage came
long after an attempt by President Truman to develop a national insurance fund that could be utilized
by all Americans. During the signing of the bill, President Johnson explained that with the Medicare
program an individual can insure themselves against illness that may present during their senior
years. Additionally, he commented that there were more than 18 million low income Americans who
are greater than 65 years of age and cannot afford to treat their illnesses. The Medicare program is
overseen by The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), and has evolved over time.
Medicare now covers individuals under the age of 65 who ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
The goal of this deception is to obtain a federal healthcare payment that would not otherwise exist.
The provider, practice, or institution may falsely claim to have provided a service or used supplies
for a patient when in reality neither the service nor the supplies were used. A secondary way to
commit Medicare fraud involves referrals. If one solicits, pays, or accepts money to encourage
referrals because the services are reimbursed by Federal healthcare programs, they are participating
in Medicare fraud. This type of fraud is addressed in the Anti–Kickback Statute. Lastly, Medicare
fraud occurs when the complexity of services are overstated and billed at a higher than necessary
rate. This action violates the False Claims Act which protects the government from being
excessively charged for goods and services.
Medicare fraud is illegal and remedies are sought at both a civil and criminal level. If a provider,
practice, or institution is found guilty of Medicare fraud, the consequences may include a loss of
license, monetary penalties, and the inability to participate in Federal healthcare programs. The
Office of Inspector General (OIG), which is a part of the U.S. Department of Health & Human
Services, has the ability to exclude individuals who participate in Medicare fraud. The guilty party
will be listed on a searchable database on the OIG website. The list is officially referred to as the
List of
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Business Ethics : A Stakeholder And Issues Management...
The other two types of whistle blowing that occur are personal and impersonal, where the
wrongdoing is be done upon the whistle blower and impersonal where harm is observed upon
another. In many cases whistle blowing is believed to occur when an employee's loyalty or
attachment is in opposition to their job commitment and job satisfaction. When whistle blowing
happens it may have a detrimental effect on relationships between the whistleblower and their co–
workers. This can create enemies between fellow employees; the whistle blower may be avoided
and mistrusted. "Indeed, whistle–blowing can be discouraged or even punished when the image of
the whistle blower is seen as "disloyal" to the organization posing risk of normalizing wrongdoing
and ultimately derive the public interest." (Ashforth & Anand, 2003)
In the book, Business Ethics: A Stakeholder and Issues Management Approach states a common
opinion, "Whistle blowing goes against strong U.S. cultural norms of showing loyally toward an
employer and colleagues and avoiding the "snitch" label. However strong cultural norms regarding
fairness, justice, a sense of duty and obedience to the law and to one's conscience also exist."
(Weiss, 2014)
It can be argued that it is impossible to associate loyalty with an abstract entity. An organization is
made up of individuals working towards the same goal; loyalty depends on organization
commitment and the culture fostered within that organization. It also requires that the

Opposition to Leakers
Are government whistleblowers acting in the public interest, or do they endanger the public by
exposing classified information? Just as government transparency has waned in recent years, there
have been several instances of very public national intelligence whistle–blowing. Large scale leaks
such as those published by The Guardian and WikiLeaks have prompted debate on issues of
government secrecy, as well as the balance between security and liberty. High profile whistleblowers
like Bradley Manning, Julian Assange, and Edward Snowden have, at great personal risk, leaked
classified information to the public in the interest of transparency. Leaked media and documents
range from embarrassing, to potentially dangerous. Heightened levels of ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
New York Times reporters James Risen and Eric Lichtblau were awarded the Pulitzer Prize; Drake
was indicted under the espionage act (Wise). The NSA came under scrutiny again in 2013 when
Edward Snowden revealed large scale data collection and surveillance programs.
As history can attest, government whistleblowers act honorably for the greater good despite threat of
prosecution. Government transparency, especially in acts of war, is important to a functioning
democracy. J. William Leonard, former US classifications czar, In the documentary We Steal
Secrets: The Story of WikiLeaks, illustrates, "To have those types of decisions, those types of
deliberations, done in secrecy is a tremendous disservice to the American people – because these are
things being done in their name – so, whether you agree with them or not, to have a free back–and–
forth airing of these is essential". In support of these concepts, those behind WikiLeaks and other
government leaks have taken great risks. Birgitta Jonsdottir, member of WikiLeaks and Icelandic
parliament, stated, "We were working on something that we knew that could get us into serious
trouble and we were all willing to take that consequence" ("We Steal Secrets"). In We Steal Secrets,
instant messages between Bradley Manning and the man who eventually turned him in, hacker

Whistleblowing Essay
Assignment 1: Whistleblowing and Sarbanes–Oxley
LEG500030VA016–11 (Law, Ethics & Corporate Governance
Professor Timothy Griffin
Strayer University
Jan Jones July 19, 2015
Describe the key characteristics of a whistleblower, and briefly summarize one (1) researched
instance of whistleblowing in one (1) publicly traded company within the last 12 months. Include
the details of the issue that the whistleblower reported and the effect of the whistleblower's actions
on both the whistleblower himself and the company.
A whistleblower is a person who exposes any kind of information or activity that is deemed illegal,
dishonest, or not correct within an organization that is either private or public. The information of
alleged ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Even though SEC didn't have to issue an award in the first case, Mike Delikat, a partner at Orrick
Herrington & Sutcliffe and chair of the firm's whistleblowing task force, thinks it may have
done so to send a message to companies that they need to take seriously the credible complaints of
wrongdoing they receive from their workers. He said SEC has been criticized for advocating that
employees can come to the agency first with information, even if their companies mandate they
report internally. This award is "like a demonstration that folks still are reporting internally but
companies aren't doing anything about it so we have to step in and whack those companies that don't
do anything," said Mr. Delikat. "That is my speculation."
L–3 responded exactly the way a publicly traded company is required to by Sarbanes–Oxley and
Dodd–Frank, sending the proper signal to whistleblowers that information about fraud is welcome
and will be acted upon, even if the results lead to short–term negative consequences for the business.
Whistleblowing cases reported to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) have increased by 35 per
cent in the past 12 months, according to new information obtained under the Freedom of
Information Act by Kroll, the global investigations firm. The Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) made payouts

Protection for Whistleblowers in Malaysia
1.0 Introduction
Legislative protection in Malaysia of whistleblowers is not an entirely new concept. Legislation
mandating personnel to disclose the existence of offences involving fraud or dishonesty, and the
attendant legal protections, already exist in certain sectors.
The Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 ("WPA"), which came into force on 15 December 2010, is
intended to provide all–encompassing protection to the private and public sectors. One of the WPA's
key objectives is to fill in the gaps left by the said sectored–specific legislation. The objective of this
act is to give safeguard to the whistleblower in the form of confidentiality of their information,
immunity from civil and malefactor action and safeguard from detrimental action being taken
against them. Whistleblower protection is one of the Malaysian Government's efforts towards
tackling corruption and promoting good governance under Regime Transformation Programme
(GTP).
The WPA is also a key legislative initiative to combat corruption by facilitating protected disclosures
through immunity from civil and criminal actions, confidentiality of information disclosed and
protection from retaliatory action. The WPA will, for the first time, introduce employment–specific
criminal liability for retaliatory action taken at the workplace. Employers in Malaysia should
therefore review and, if necessary, implement appropriate revisions to their existing whistleblower
policies.
Dworkin & Baucus, Park &

The Company 's Code Of Conduct
Based on the audit report, the Ethics Committee should agree that both Arun and Smita are violating
the company's code of conduct. Then, the company should take actions to deliver the decision to
related people. For example, if the decision of the Ethics Committee is to terminate both Arun and
Smita, then the committee needs to get the CEO's approval and start the procedure of termination
based on the company's code of conduct. First, the company will send out a formal written
announcement to Arun and Smith of the decision made by the Ethics Committee, as well as the
reasons which will be the summary of the audit report. If the company's code of conduct does not
state that employees can appeal after receive their punishment, then Arun and Smith have to leave
the company. Of course, they can take legal actions to fight for their rights like sue the Prashanti
company . In that case, the legal department and IA team of Prashanti will have to respond. They
can solve the problem through mediation or lawsuit case. On the other hand, if the company allows
employees to appeal, and Arun and Smith chose to appeal. Then the IA team will respond to the
appeal and hold a vote within the company to decided if the company will accept Arun's and Smith's
appeal or not. The simple result will be Arun and Smith understand that they were wrong and accept
the decision. Of course, the whole audit, decision–making, and termination process of the Arun and
Smith case was frustrated and

Essay On Whistleblower Protection Act
Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012
Introduction
Often the debate arises of whether human–beings are born with an innate sense of "right–from–
wrong" and most often the consensus is, yes. The later question might then be, what makes a person
question doing the right thing? In the reality of someone who may be labeled a "whistleblower,"
apprehension to report wrongdoings may reasonably come from fear of retaliation. Particularly
when the wrong–doing is occurring within the federal government and/or secret intelligence
community. Who will stand up to these powers and what protection can policy afford those that take
the ultimate risk in "doing the right thing" by unveiling the crimes of waste, fraud, and abuse within
our government ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
[R–IA], C. (2015, July 30). Text – S.Res.236 – 114th Congress (2015–2016): A resolution
designating July 30, 2015, as "National Whistleblower Appreciation Day". | Congress.gov | Library
of Congress. Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th–congress/senate–
resolution/236/text
Kasner, A. J. (2015). NATIONAL SECURITY LEAKS AND CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY. Stanford
Law Review, 67(1), 241–283. Retrieved from https://nuls.idm.oclc.org/login?
url=http://search.proquest.com.nuls.idm.oclc.org/docview/1661722557?accountid=25320
Lohman, A. (2015). SILENCE OF THE LAMBS: GIVING VOICE TO THE PROBLEM OF RAPE
AND SEXUAL ASSAULT IN THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES. Northwestern Journal of
Law and Social Policy, 10(1), 230–279. Retrieved from https://nuls.idm.oclc.org/login?
url=http://search.proquest.com.nuls.idm.oclc.org/docview/1667167592?accountid=25320
Lucas, G. R. (2014). NSA management directive #424: Secrecy and privacy in the aftermath of
edward snowden. Ethics & International Affairs, 28(1), 29–38.
doi:http://dx.doi.org.nuls.idm.oclc.org/10.1017/S0892679413000488
Meyer, D., & Berenbaum, D. (2015). THE WASP'S NEST: INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY
WHISTLEBLOWING & SOURCE PROTECTION. Journal of National Security Law & Policy,
8(1), 1–49. Retrieved from

Whistleblower: Protected Disclosure
Whistleblowers
What is the Whistleblowers Protection Act?
The Whistleblowers Protection Act 2001 ("the Act") supports the Government's commitment to the
principles of open, honest and accountable governance. It is designed to protect the public interest
by: exposing serious public sector wrongdoing; ensuring public organisations are responsible and
accountable; and protecting whistleblowers from detrimental action and protecting their privacy.
How do I become a whistleblower?
A whistleblower is any person who makes an allegation about improper conduct by staff of the
Department of Human Services or the Department of Health ("the departments") or funded agency.
Making a disclosure under the Act can be done either orally or in ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
What happens once the PDC determines that a protected disclosure has been made?
Once the PDC determines that a 'protected disclosure' has been made, the PDC must assess whether
it also constitutes a 'public interest disclosure.' In order for the PDC to be satisfied that a public
interest disclosure exists, the disclosure must show that a public body or public officer: has engaged,
is engaging or proposes to engage in improper conduct in their capacity as a public officer or public
body; or has taken, is taking or proposes to take detrimental action. If the PDC determines that a
'public interest disclosure' exists, the whistleblower will be notified of the decision and the
disclosure will be referred to the Ombudsman for
How CIIRu handles whistleblower complaints
Whistleblower complaint made
Is it a 'Protected Disclosure' under Part 2 of the Act?
No Yes
Need more information?
If you would like to make a Whistleblower complaint, please contact the Protected Disclosure
Coordinator on: 1300 131 431. Please note: Your call will go through to an automated answering
service and will only be recieved by the Protected Disclosure Coordinator. For further general
information on Whistleblowers consult: Manager CIIRu/Whistleblowers on (03) 9096 7312
Manager Fraud Control/Whistleblowers on (03)

Characteristics And Impact Of Whistleblowers
Characteristics and Impact of Whistleblowers
Tony J. Hillian
1–23–15
Professor Weekley
Law, Ethics, And Corporate Governance
Strayer University
Characteristics and Impact of Whistleblowers Corporate America is still reeling from scandals and
corporate corruption caused by excessive greed and the need to rake in huge profits. In this paper,
the writer will provide some characteristics and impacts of individuals know as "whistleblowers".
Whistleblowers have emerged to facilitate corporate executives and corporations being more
transparent, and ensuring that stakeholders rights are protected from inordinate corporate greed. The
writer provides details and accounts of a recent whistleblower activity, and provides a summation of
those activities. Finally, the writer provides perspectives as to the impact the whistleblower's
activities ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Personal and Company Effect of Whistleblower's Actions
Melamed (2014) reported that O'Donnell received his record–breaking award in part due to a 16%
share of a $350 million slice of the penalty levied against Bank of America. O'Donnell is also
protected under the Sarbanes–Oxley Act from any retaliation by Countrywide or Bank of
America. As for Bank of America, the penalty signaled the beginning of "zero tolerance" for corrupt
corporate officials. In the report, Melamed (2014) made reference to comments by U.S. Attorney
General Eric Holder that the settlement was commeasure with the level of corruption and should be
perceived by other corporates executives as the punishment for any unethical behaviors moving
forward.
Whistleblower Justification
Moberly (2006) argued that with the rash of corporate scandals, and the public's

Review the Video Whistleblower Fired for Exposing...
Whistleblower Fired for Exposing Truth/Corrupt Government Contractor
By Yolanda Holmes
Capella University
Abstract
Navy performed limited background checks on Thompson and Salvatore Carabetta when project
was granted. Shaw Group and Carabetta were feuding during project, company rejected warnings
from whistle–blower John Jack, costs escalated and components of houses were downgraded
without Navy approval. Navy couldn't get documentation out of American Eagle, Navy didn't act
quickly on information from John Jack.
Principal–agent theory. In this time of ever more scarce government resources, the idea that one
level of government can mandate the activities and therefore resource usage of another may seem
counter–intuitive. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It became apparent very quickly that this was not an isolated example; that this was not an isolated
problem. Nalder found it in one job after another from Patrick Air Force base in Florida, to fort
Leonard Wood Army Base in Missouri. American Eagle's military home–building projects had fallen
behind schedule. In Jacksonville, Arkansas, home of Little Rock Air Force Base, local Journalist
John Hoffheimer reported that civilians were suffering from American Eagle's actions as well. The
first indication there were any problems, occurred when there were rumors that some contractors
were being paid late or perhaps not being paid at all. Most of these were small companies, which
was putting them in a financial bind. There was one sub–contractor filed for bankruptcy. Dozens of
other settle for small percentages of what they owed. However, there was one that held out, Tommy
Austin, Cement business. They were contracted to pour the foundations of more that 200 homes for
American Eagle. His lawyers are still trying to get all the money he says he was promised. In the
end, the Air Force actually bears some of the responsibility because they did not have tight controls
over this process Films Media Group. (2009, June 30).
The principal agent theory applies to this Whistleblower's Tale because the Navy, (we are going to
call them shareholders)

Should Whistleblowers Be Protected
12/6/14
Should Whistleblowers Be Protected? * Introduction
The corruption rate in a community that does not support or protect reporting illegal activities is
significantly high. Employees who work in public or private organizations are the first to identify
wrongdoings in a workplace since they have up–to–date information. Whistleblowing can be an
essential tool to identify and report these actions in the public, private and non–profit sectors.
However, by revealing wrongdoings, whistleblowers often take high personal risks. Lacking strong
legal protection might increase the change of facing dismissal, harassment and other forms of
retaliation ("Whistleblower protection", 2012).
Whistleblower protection is vital to motivate ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
* The False Claims Act
During the civil war, the False Claims Act (FCA) was passed to prevent the fraud committed by
companies that were selling supplies to the Union Army. The Act contained qui tam provisions
which authorized citizens to speak out against those deceiving companies. The public awareness of
the FCA has been growing since the passage of the 1986 amendments. The number of
whistleblowers cases that were filed has grown significantly to more than 6,000 cases in 2014
(Kusserow, 2014).
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has reported in 2013 that it has secured about $3.8 billion
from civil cases that involve fraud against the government. More than 70 percent of the recoveries,
which translated to $2.9 billion, were from lawsuits filed under the qui tam provision of the law.
This significant amount of recovery was the second largest annual recovery and fourth year in a row
which the DOJ has recuperated. Through this process, over $17 billion has been recovered since
January 2009. This number is nearly half of the total amount of money that was recovered since the
Act was amended in 1986. Whistleblowers or the qui tam provisions which permit individuals to
blow the whistle was the main cause of the spectacular amount of recovery (Kusserow, 2014).
When the government succeed in winning the case, the whistleblower receives up to 30 percent of
the

Whistleblower And Watergate Scandal
A "whistleblower" is the one who informs against another. The term likely brings to mind famous
cases surrounding highly publicized criminal acts, such as Sherron Watkins exposing Enron's
fraudulent stock inflation or even "Deep Throat" revealing details that brought to light the Watergate
scandal. These are major cases involving elaborate trials and major media attention, but that's not
how everyday whistleblowing occurs. Although the wrongdoing taking place in various workplaces,
agencies, government, and organizations may not constitute large–scale criminal acts, they still pose
significant challenges to the potential whistleblower who may feel a moral obligation to report what
he or she has witnessed. How often does wrongdoing ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For instance, reporting a coworker may undermine the trust of other coworkers, destroy friendships,
and posing a risk to professional standing. Uncertainty about procedures and protections also lurks
with whistleblowing but is an area that employers can address. A whistleblowing procedure should
be part of an agency's written policies and should include a clear description of employee
protections, the steps one takes to report a concern, and even what constitutes a reasonable concern.
The fear of retaliation also is a barrier. Fear of firing or retribution is a major concern and probably
stops a lot of social workers, especially when the concern involves a supervisor or agency

VA Whistleblower
Throughout the history of the United States the government has felt a responsibility to care for those
who defend the freedom of the United States. This responsibility is to make sure that our veterans
have the best care possible when they return home from war. Since its establishment, the Veterans
Affairs (VA) has come under fire from all angles, saying that they are not offering the best possible
care for our Veterans. Throughout history yellow journalism has been found to destroy some
organizations. The VA is an organization who has experienced the effects of yellow journalism and
they are trying to recover. The VA is taking the yellow journalism and turning it into constructive
criticism in order to improve their services for the United States Veterans. During the year of 2014
the VA experienced the largest scandal in the past 20 years. The Phoenix, Arizona VA was revealed
to have extremely long wait times for the Veterans to receive care. This news led to the Director of
the Phoenix VA being accused of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the case of the VA scandal many of the whistleblowers are scared about what will happen to them
once the information is out there. "VA whistleblower reprisal cases received by OSC has been rising
quickly, from 405 in fiscal 2013 to a projected 712 for fiscal 2015 – a 75 percent jump" (Davidson).
The idea of the whistleblower is that the truth will be exposed and the problems will be fixed. When
a whistleblower decides to come forward they are risking their jobs and how other people view
them. According to Sen. Ron Johnson (R–Wis) "The VA has a culture problem with whistleblower
retaliation." Basically Sen. Johnson is saying that if a person decides to come forward they are not
guaranteed protection from retaliation by coworkers. Without these whistleblowers the VA scandal
would not have come to light. The country never would have known about the falsifying of patient
documents or the other problems facing the

Pros And Cons Of Filing A Whistleblower Suit
In my opinion, filing a whistleblower suit is definitely not for the faint of heart. There is definitely
anxiety and stress associated with uncovering and eventually reporting alleged fraud. In an effort to
prevent the whistleblower from revealing the lawsuit to anyone, whistleblower or qui tam cases are
generally filed under court seal. This means the relator cannot discuss the case with family, friends
or co–workers until the government has completed their investigation and can oftentimes be difficult
on the person bringing the evidence to light, as this may bring about feelings of isolation. The
government uses the seal to their advantage in order to covertly investigate any and all allegations
surrounding the whistleblower's

Whistleblowing Essay
AC 4001 – Interim Assignment – 2012/2013
Name: James Nicholas Anthony Cassin
Student No: 109444602
Word Count: 1988
I don't agree with the statement provided that 'whistleblowing' is an enemy of business and creates
suspicion and disharmony. This is simply the old traditional view of the idea of whistleblowing that
there is a spy or snitch within the camp looking after his/her own interests. This old and traditional
view is largely based on the case that employee's within organisations had very little rights and they
weren't encouraged to be vocal about any misbehaviour or inappropriate dealings they would have
witnessed within the organisation. The idea that whistleblowing is encouraging a widespread
disunity within a firm is a purely ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This is to ensure that the whistleblowing allegations are dealt with in a fair and transparent manner
for the benefit of the employee and the organisation." So the obvious objective out of this of this act
is to ultimately benefit the organisation as a whole and make it more credible to public users who
use the organisation that the best practices are being implied and in turn everyone can feel confident
that the organisation is run right.
The point can be made that "whistleblowing" within a firm, large or small can be encouraged by
putting in place policies and a process within a firm that will protect the employee's and benefit the
organisation by: * Avoiding any unnecessary and unwanted publicity in the event that some of the
staff within the organisation are engaged in bad behaviour. * There may be the benefit of generating
positive publicity from a social responsibility perspective. * It may reinforce a culture of values–
based leadership and senior management accountability. * It may increase

Whistleblowers Should Be Greater Protected
Whistleblowing in the US has long been a controversial topic for many. Whistleblowers are people
who work either as outsiders, like journalists, or insiders who uncover secrets from the inside of a
corporation– who expose wrongdoings and secrets in the government or businesses. Being a
whistleblower is risky business; reputations are put on the line and they commonly face legal
trouble. While in the last century Congress has done more to protect these whistleblowers, many
people are still on edge about the practice of whistleblowing and protecting it under laws. A big
debate that has come to play is whether whistleblowers should be greater protected, or if they should
be prosecuted by the law. Whistleblowing has in many instances been extremely helpful to US
citizens, and here's why it should be fully protected by the government. First off, whistleblowers are
by definition someone who informs on an organization involved in illicit behavior– illicit meaning
forbidden by law. In Gale's Opposing ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Before all of these events, the 1912 Lloyd–LaFollette Act was already in place–which allowed
employees to give that type of secret information to Congress. But when these more modern
whistleblowers were constantly exposing information to the public, rather than just the Congress,
more effective protection was called for. The Whistleblower Protection Act of 1997 protected them
for all exposure and even prohibited retaliation. But the biggest achievements for whistleblowers
were made by the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, which
required rewards for successful whistleblowers along with protection. With whistleblowers
constantly risking their own lives and reputation to keep the public informed, it was finally time for
them to get the thanks they deserved instead of

Qui Tam Actions Seminar Paper
SNITCHING FOR RICHES: WHISTLEBLOWER BOUNTIES AND THE $96 MILLION
CHERYL ECKARD SETTLEMENT
Introduction Bounties have been employed by United States government over the history of our
Nation. As differentiated from rewards, which offer payment for accomplishment of a specific act
such as providing information that leads to the capture of a particular criminal, bounties are tailored
to encourage the services or actions by some class of persons in pursuance of a governmental
purpose. One of the earliest examples in the United States is the grant of bounty land grants during
both the Revolutionary War and Civil War. For the purpose of encouraging longer military service,
this bounty system would offer land to men fit for service in return ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The FCA enforces this statute, in part, by allowing a private person, typically an employee or other
agent of the violator with particular knowledge of a violation, to bring suit on behalf of the
government, otherwise known as a qui tam action. This qui tam plaintiff, referred to as a relator, is
entitled to a bounty between 15% and 25% of the settlement amount in the situation where the
government proceeds with the action brought by the relator. In the case where the government
doesn't proceed with the action, the relator is entitled to between 25% and 30% of the settlement
amount.
Traditionally there was a bar that limited a relator from bringing a qui tam action under the FCA and
thus being qualified to receive any whistleblower bounty resulting from the settlement. The bar was
basically two–fold. The allegations or transactions underlying the action cannot have been publicly
disclosed, unless the relator was the original source of the information. Prior to amendment in 2010,
this bar required the court to dismiss the action if the allegations had been public disclosed or the
relator was not the original source of the information, which resulted in this becoming the primary
defense in FCA actions. However, with amendment in 2010, the power to dismiss was effectively
shifted from the court to the government with the addition of the language "unless opposed by the
Government".

The Pros And Cons Of Tobacco
On January 11, 1964, the United States Surgeon General Luther L. Terry endorsed the research
findings of American pathologists that tobacco is an addictive substance ("50 Years of Tobacco
Control"). Subsequently, Terry confirmed that nicotine contains addictive and harmful chemicals,
and that continuous usage may lead to lung cancer, coronary heart disease, emphysema and
bronchitis in users of the delivery devices, like cigarettes ("50 Years of Tobacco Control").
Moreover, this endorsement dominated newspaper headlines and television newscasts across the
United States, resulting in television and radio abandoning cigarette advertisements in 1970.
Nevertheless, today, more than 45 million Americans continue to smoke, more than 8 million are
living with smoking related health issues, and approximately 500,000 Americans die prematurely
each year as a result of tobacco use ("50 Years of Tobacco Control"). However, fast forward over
three decades later, Chief Executive Officers (CEO) from one of the top tobacco corporations in the
United States testified under oath before a congressional subcommittee "nicotine is not addictive"
("50 Years of Tobacco Control"). On February 4, 1996, Dr. Jeff Wigand, became nationally known
as a whistleblower after revealing on the news show "60 Minutes" that the tobacco company that he
worked for, Brown & Williamson, not only knew that nicotine was addictive, but manipulated its
tobacco properties with other chemicals to enhance it's

Whistleblowing And Sarbanes Oxley Due
Whistleblowing and Sarbanes–Oxley Due
Whistleblowing can be described as the disclosure of illegal, immoral, underhand or unlawful
transactions, deals or practices of their employers or companies to people, institutions that are most
likely to take action. What sets whistleblowing apart from other types of disclosures such as a tell–
all is that it is made for the purpose of reporting wrongdoing in a company or organization to an
agency or person that can take some actions. Whistleblowing is gaining popularity at such a fast
pace, and more people are coming forward with dirty deals of their companies in the hope that
something can be done about it. The reasoning behind whistleblowing is that the rights and interests
of the public are hampered and interfered with by organizational abuses that go against the accepted
societal norms and may breed inefficiency if something is not done about it (Weinstein, 1979).
Organizations that encourage a culture of whistleblowing by their employees have been known to be
more transparent characterized by free employee communication and trust. The benefit of this is that
wrongs can be easily detected, and it also promotes an ethical work environment (Berry,
2004).However, whistleblowing is not an easy thing that anyone can do especially in an
organization. It always come with consequences that may not only affect the whistleblower but often
those he cares deeply about such as spouse and

Whistleblowers In Law Enforcement
Law enforcement has always been an example to their citizens because of the values that these
institutions represent like leadership, integrity, fairness, team work and service orientation. When
one of these values is broken the rest start falling apart and it slowly starts spreading among the rest
of the personnel in the institution until one decides to stand up for what is right. These officers are
called "whistleblowers" this term was created in the early 1970s by US civic activist Ralph Nader,
this word was used to avoid the negative terms like "snitches" or "informers" and it makes reference
to a referee who uses its whistle to call out a foul play. Just like some officers who have spoken out
on their colleagues actions. Most ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Serpico was just recently transferred to the Narcotics division of the New York Police Department
by early 1971. On Feb 3 1971 Frank and two other officers were working in the Hispanic section of
Brooklyn on a drug dealer case, when they got to the suspects apartment Serpico was directed by the
officer behind him to get in the apartment since he knew Spanish and they would take it after that,
the officers beside him were with their guns ready for when he opened the door. By the time Serpico
opened the door the suspect pushed it back hitting him in the head and shoulder preventing him
from moving. At the moment the officers beside him did not do anything to stop the suspect while
Serpico was disabled which caused confusion in him, while he looked at one of the officers with
disconcert Frank was shot in the face by the suspect, by reflex he shot back injuring the suspect.
Serpico narrated how his backup did not call ambulance or requested assistance they simply just left
him there. An old Hispanic man who lived in the building was the one who called an ambulance,
with the ambulance a patrol car came along to follow up on the situation and they realized he was a
narcotics officer they rushed him to the nearest hospital. Serpico stated that while they were driving
him to the hospital an officer said "If I knew it was him, I would have left him there to bleed to
death" A real investigation was never conducted in regards to what happened that day but later on,
Frank Serpico testified before the Knapp Commission, This made him the first to testify against a
fellow officer and also speak out on systematic corruption within the

Key Characteristics Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
Introduction
In this paper, I will cover the characteristics of a whistleblower provide an example of one and cover
how the Sarbanes–Oxley Act would be used in this particular event.
Describe the Key Characteristic of a Whistleblower
Generally, whistleblowers are employees of a company that has stumbled upon an unethical
situation that their company has done or is doing. They do not want to cause any harm to the
company instead they feel that it's their morals and dedication to the company to report these issues
to management. But when their reports are not taken seriously and people can be at risk or injured
then they have to make the decision whether to report the illegal situation to the authorities and or to
the public. According to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Act provides legal remedies for wrongfully discharged from employment. The Act requires all
publicly traded companies to have an internal and independent audit committee. The company has to
establish policies for employees to be able to file an internal whistleblower complaint which the
policies would protect those employee identities. The Act also requires ethical standards for
attorneys who works with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Also, the Act provides
criminalized retaliation against whistleblowers who provide truthful information to law enforcement
and lastly the fourth part provides an enforcement provision which states any person that violates
this Act will be treated as a violation of the Securities Exchange Act of

Application Letter For Student Writing Essay
1 Hi, Julie! Thank you for sharing your (and your group members?) work with me today? I?m
looking forward to reviewing it. Thanks too for your note in the appointment form! I?ll be glad to
help you work on cohesiveness and clarity of ideas today. I want to share a few things about what
you can expect from my review before you read through my comments on your work. First of all, I
strive to make my comments as universally applicable as possible?while I?ll be giving feedback that
is specific to this document, I hope you will find my comments helpful in future writing projects as
well. Secondly, I aim to respond to student writing first and foremost as a reader, highlighting places
where I think you can strengthen the clarity of your document so that you can best communicate
your ideas. This means that I will focus the 30 minutes I have with your draft on the things I think
are most immediately important, and may not comment on every instance of error I notice (for this
reason, it?s always a good idea to go through and proofread your work yourself, even if you have
the writing center review it!). And finally, please don?t let the number of comments in the draft
alarm you. Even if it looks like I?ve given you a lot of feedback, that doesn?t mean your writing is
bad! In fact, it is more likely to indicate that you have the potential to write something really strong.
( Of course, though, if you have questions about my feedback, you should always feel free to reach
out to me. I

Whistleblowers Research Paper
It is popularly believed, even by presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, that whistleblowers only
break promises of the nation, and release critically secret information to the everyday public. Many
believe that they should be punished for this violation of secrecy. Yet, perhaps what they release
could be saving the country and government. Secrets in government of war and finances can be
detrimental to the health of the United States of America from the spread of conspiracy theories and
due to the fact that the government, which should be protecting the people, is sneaking behind
citizen's backs and making their own worldwide decisions. Whistleblowers are needed to create a
prosperous and stable country if our government is going to be this corrupt with their secrets.
Corruption with government secrets is a main topic as to why whistleblowers are needed. There is a
fine line between what the government needs to hold and what the government should share, but it is
popularly believed that the government needs to release more so it can actually feel like the people
get their own say. Whistleblowers don't just believe that there are huge amounts of secrets that need
to be released, but they only say what must be said. Edward Snowden was a technical assistant who
worked for the NSA and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Even the Whistleblower Protection Act was about government workers who planned to release
information due to the fact that it's a corrupt idea to hold secret must go through a process with the
government to work out the problem which probably wouldn't draw anyone to not illegally sell
information. The IG for Department of Justice Michael Horowitz claimed that all whistleblowers
want to do is release information that they will think help the country to know. So far, the this has
been the case, and many supporters have come out to say that the revealed secret holds use at how
the government was being corrupt for holding on to

Assignment 1 Whistleblowing and Sarbanes Oxley Due Essay
Whistleblowing and Sarbanes–Oxley Due
Artize L. Johnson
Professor: Steve Harris
LEG 500
Law, Ethics, & Corporate Governance
26 April 2015
According to Halbert, Ingulli, & Frey (2015), whistleblowers are people who decide to report
unethical or illegal activities, usually activities under the control of their employers. They may be
working for private companies, nonprofit organizations, or for the government. A whistleblower is
an individual working in an organization who decides to expose the misconduct, misbehavior, or
illegal actions occurring in that organization. Making the decision to expose these actions can be
very difficult to disclose with the fear of repercussion. The information being disclosed to ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Employers will threaten to fire or suspend a whistleblower, being able to combat retaliation will
help in this fight.
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. is a publicly traded company that has been in the news for whistleblowing
in the last 12 months. In March of 2014, the New York Federal Court awarded Keith Edwards, a
former employee of J.P. Morgan, $64 million dollars for his part in the Whistleblowing of a case that
defrauded the U.S. government. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., were submitting false claims to U.S.
government to insure flawed home loans (Stempel, 2014). For more than a decade, JP Morgan
Chase & Co. submitted thousands of mortgages for insurance by the Federal Housing
Administration or the Department of Veterans Affairs that did not qualify for government
guarantees. J.P. Morgan admitted to failing to report to agencies that their internal reviews revealed
problems also.
During the year 2003 through 2008 Keith Edwards was the Assistant Vice President of a
government–insuring unit with J.P. Morgan. During his tenure, Mr. Edwards believed that Wall
Street and his own company J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. were being deceitful in their actions. Mr.
Edwards wanted to show that companies involved in deceitful action should be held accountable for
their actions, he became known as a whistleblower for his actions. In 2008 J.P. Morgan fired Keith
Edward for action in exposing their organization. As the result of Mr. Edwards exposing the

What Is The Case Of Healing Hospital England Whistleblower
The case about Ealing Hospital England and its whistle–blowing is one of the most popular whistle–
blowing incidents in the recent times. Miss Sharmila Chowdhury is a whistleblower in this case. A
person who uncovered any kind of details or facts that is unlawful, illicit, criminal, dishonest or
incorrect within any corporation is known as whistleblower. A whistleblower has two options to
bring information or accusation to surface by internally or externally. Internally, a whistleblower can
lead his/her statement to awareness of other people within the accused corporation. Externally, a
whistle–blower can also contact a third party outside of the corporation such as media. So the
question arises, is a whistleblower a

Whistleblowing
Whistleblowing LEG 500
Whistleblowing in a Publicly Traded Company
Whistleblowing implies the imperative necessity to alert others (company) about immorality issues,
including illegal activity, happening inside the organization. For the employee who decides to blow
the whistle "usually brings to he/she undesirable consequences." Some consequences are like
threats, loss of employment, and social rejection. (Chiu,R. 2003)
Whistleblower Traits
Whistleblowers are characterized by strong ethic–moral values. They are perceived as an active
person with enough courage to expose the wrongdoing occurring inside their company. They are
"perceived as altruistically driven individuals who are steered by their attitudes."
The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Ranbaxy agreed with FDA to don't produce drugs for USA until they meet the requirements
specified by American standards.
Whistleblowing Justification
Any pharmaceutical company Pharmaceutical, in North America, has to prove they are making
products "bioequivalent" or have the same results as the Original Medicine.
The whistleblower was aware that the company was falsifying documents, didn't meet the
requirements to produce drugs according with USA regulations. Whistleblower action was justified
because the fact that the company was making and selling medicine without scientific support it
might put in jeopardy the health of many people who were in taking the drug.
Whistleblower protection under the Sarbanes–Oxley Act
The Whistleblower was in protected under the Sarbanes–Oxley Act. Whistle blowing protection is
important for both Sarbanes Oxley and fraud protection. The Sarbanes –Oxley Act protect
employees from publicly traded companies from retaliation against them after report the
wrongdoing. In India where the company is located, whistleblowers don't have any protection.
In this particular case the investigation took eight years. Thakur contacted the FDA which was in
charge to not only investigate the case but to offer protection to him and his family.
The company faced civil penalties under the False Claims Act, "which allows citizens to bring civil
actions on behalf of the United States and share in any recovery." (McCafferty)

Highly Publicized Whistleblower
A whistleblower is described as a person who reports serious misconducts and threats to the public.
The key characteristics of a whistleblower include but are not limited to the ones listed below: (1)
unselfishly motivated, (2) a utilitarian–practical, (3) uninterested in changing their professional
behavior, (4) allows their own attitudes and beliefs to guide them and are (5) well educated and hold
professional positions within the corporation. A highly publicized whistleblowing incident is the one
about General Motors and their faulty ignition switches on their vehicles. This has has caused
General Motors to recall 8.2 million vehicles as of July 1, 2014. The recall affects Chevrolet,
Cadillac, Pontiac, Oldsmobile and Buick models between

Whistleblower Essay
David Robilliard
COHP 330
Module 11
1. What is a whistleblower?
A person who informs on a person or organization engaged in an illicit activity, who exposes any
kind of information or activity that is deemed illegal.
How might a company get back at a whistleblower and how does OSHA protect a
Whistleblower?
 Blacklisting
 Demoting
 Denying overtime or promotion
 Disciplining
 Denying benefits
 Failing to hire or rehire
 Firing or laying off
 Intimidation
 Making threats
 Reassignment to a less desirable position
 Reducing pay or hours
 Suspension
OSHA's whistleblower statutes protect you from retaliation. An employer cannot retaliate by taking
"adverse action" against workers who report injuries, safety concerns, or other protected ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
2. What is imminent danger?
Definition. Section 13(a) of the Act defines imminent danger as "... any conditions or practices in
any place of employment which are such that a danger exists which could reasonably be expected to
cause death or serious physical harm
How can you refuse to do dangerous work?
If the condition clearly presents a risk of death or serious physical harm, there is not sufficient time
for OSHA to inspect, and, where possible, you have brought the condition to the attention of your
employer, you may have a legal right to refuse to work in a situation in which you would be exposed
to the hazard. (OSHA cannot enforce union contracts that give employees the right to refuse to
work.)
What criteria must be met?

 You refused to work in "good faith." This means that you must genuinely believe that an
imminent danger exists
 A reasonable person would agree that there is a real danger of death or serious injury
 There isn't enough time, due to the urgency of the hazard, to get it corrected through regular
enforcement channels, such as requesting an OSHA

Is Whistleblowers Right To Know?
Argumentative Essay: Whistleblowers are people who declassify government secret because things
might question the ethics of what the government is doing. The citizen might find something out and
feel it is wrong and against human law. So that person might go to the press or live TV. Somewhere
to have their voice and findings heard. They expose the government for what they have done. Some
question if that is just as wrong for betraying or if it's the citizens rights to know. Sometimes the
government crosses the line and someone finally says what needs to be heard. Whistleblowers are
not in the wrong for exposing people that are doing wrong. Whistleblowers are typically just normal
American citizens that find out maybe something they shouldn't. An example is after the 911 attacks,
a employ of the NSA was trying to prove a theory he had about the attacks. But instead he found out
that the NSA was going against the right of privacy. The NSA was tapping into phone conversations
and listening to people's phone calls. So the employee, Thomas Drake, started telling a news
reporter of his findings after his boss dismissed his findings. The government was going to far and
invading citizens privacies. They knew it was wrong too yet they still did it. But that's not the only
case. Many people have found out things and gave it out because citizens have a right to know.
There is now laws that protect whistleblowers against corporations so that ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He would hack into government computers and steal information and release it to the web for
anyone to know the truth and for anyone to make a news story about it. He built a team and they
sought after information to expose the government. The hacker released a video of an aircraft
shooting unarmed civilians in Baghdad. He released the footage and many people saw it and the
government was once again busted by a

Sympathy For The Whistleblower
Sympathy for Kathy In the novel and film "The Whistleblower" the authors and directors did great
jobs making you really connect with characters and sympathize with more than one of them. It was a
story that really made you feel an emotional rollercoaster, at least with me there was anger, sadness,
frustration, confusion and more. At the same time as there were negative feelings there were the
feelings of hope and cheering for certain characters. No matter what was going on I almost always
felt some sort of compassion, sympathy, empathy and apprehension. The authors and directors did a
good job of making you feel mainly sympathetic in the entire film/novel. Specifically I was
constantly had the feeling of sympathy with the lead character Kathy ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
She was one woman in a country that was foreign to her and when it all got down to it it was really
her against hundreds of men. These men weren't going to let her waltz in and take their jobs and
manhood and whatnot. When she was getting the threatening messages and Hynes was saying very
strange things to her in their meeting I was shaken up for her. In the meeting with Hynes was when
it was realized that all the international workers had a safety net, everything they did they got away
with a slap on the wrist. This is when Kathy realized that she was in something bigger than herself
but she was still doing it solo. Bolkovac made a bold move and sent out that mass email basically
saying that no matter what she wasn't backing down and the greatest part of that email was "It is
time we realize this is serious organized crime, making huge amounts of money in this country"
(131). Kathy Bolkovac was defeated time and time again but that never stopped her. All she wanted
was justice for those poor girls that were being trafficked and the men and the corrupt government
were doing everything to make sure she didn't get that. When they took her job and told her she had
to leave immediately that was the one time I felt defeated as well for Kathy. She was at her breaking
point and at that point I had thought it was all over. Thankfully she still did have a couple people on
her side and routing for her because that made her succeed in letting the world know what was really
going on and who the problem people really were. It was mentioned earlier but coming back to the
idea of the emotional rollercoaster it was really hard to not be cheering for Kathy in those times that
she was being shut down time and time again. But when those times came that she was absolutely
dominating and not letting anyone step in her way was a sigh of relief for at least a little bit. But
when it came

Essay On SEC Whistleblowers
SEC whistleblowers who provide tips about possible unlawful conduct are heroes, although they
rarely see themselves that way. Anyone who is considering alerting the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) about irregularities that involve their employer, colleagues or friends
has probably wrestled with the decision for a while before taking action. People who find the
courage to report potential violations should remember that they are protecting investors who are
saving for retirement or their child's college education.
While most individuals working in the financial services industry are familiar with the SEC
whistleblower program, few know anyone who actually submitted a tip to the SEC, since
whistleblowers often use an attorney to make an anonymous submission. While the SEC protects
whistleblower's identities, it's possible that a person's employer will figure out where the SEC is
getting their information. Being represented by an attorney ensures that a whistleblower has
someone to turn to in case the firm decides to retaliate.
Individuals also choose to submit their information through an SEC whistleblower attorney to
ensure that their tip is well–presented and actionable. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Only whistleblowers who furnish information which helps the SEC collect at least $1,000,000 in
penalties are eligible for an award, which can range from 10 to 30 percent of the fines assessed
against the company found guilty of securities fraud. There are many factors that the SEC considers
when determining a whistleblower's reward, including the whistleblower's participation in the
fraudulent activity. In certain cases, individuals who engaged in the misconduct may still be eligible
for a reward; complicit persons should always consult a highly experienced SEC whistleblower
attorney before giving the SEC their

My Response to an Inspiring Blog About Whistle Blowing...
Thank you for your inspiring blog.
In your blog post you raised the issue of whether whistleblowing is believed to be morally right or
wrong.
Davies states that Whistleblowing always comprises a definite or at least acknowledged an objective
to prevent something bad that would otherwise occurs.
What Vokes has done is ethically correct. He followed the proper channels, which is to approach his
company's managers and seniors. This is because he was not pleased with the overall care from the
company.
You have rightly pointed out the position of Vokes and his tactic before going public as a
whistleblower. The actions and the approach have a place in Davies "Theory of Complicity". This is
demonstrated by the circumstance that Vokes morally ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Therefore, one has to ask how can a practice that has brought about so much good and prevented so
much harm not be ethical.
In your blog post, you said that "even the most dedicated that there must be a limit to the amount of
loyalty that an employee has towards the business."
I should argue that there should be no reason why an employee should have loyalty to the company.
Vokes has ethical duty of blowing the whistle to sure there is a safe place to work which will
increase happiness and decrease harm.
Duska claimed that a person may have a casual relationship but they do not owe any loyalty to these
casual encounters. Duska also believed that the main goal of a business is to make profit, if you do
not make a profit your business will soon ceased to end. A relationship that requires loyalty is of
give and take which involves faithfulness, honesty, reliability and mutual enrichment. Loyalty
requires us to consider the needs of others and not to always act in own self–interest. So, loyalty
requires only people with constant relationship in our lives whom we trust them but not just any
relationship.
Some however see it as an act of disloyalty to the employer who is the means of the employee's
livelihood. Duska argues in his article of "Whistleblowing and Employee loyalty" that is no
obligation to loyalty because a company is not a person, it's an instrument with a specific purpose of
making a profit. He defines a loyalty relationship as

Whistleblower Ethical Dilemmas
1.0 Introduction
According to (Williams, 2015), a moral dilemma is a conflict in which a person have to choose
between two or more actions and have moral reasons for choosing each action. A whistleblower can
be anyone who has and can report insider knowledge of illegal activities that are happening in an
organization. Therefore we can also say that whistleblowers can be supplier, client, contractor or an
employee who somehow becomes aware of illegal activities that are happening in a business either
through being told about it or witnessing the behavior. The alleged information of wrongdoing can
be grouped in many ways, law, regulation, violation of company policy/rules, fraud, corruption as
well as threat to public interest/national security (Vandekerckhove, 2006).
2.0 Types of Whistleblowers in School and in the Work Place
2.1 Internal Whistleblower
In most cases whistleblowers are internal whistleblowers, which report on misconduct that happen
within the company done by fellow employee or superior. Interesting questions with respect to
internal whistleblowers is, under what circumstances a person will act on to spot and to stop illegal,
unacceptable behavior and report it. If there are complaint systems within the organization that offer
not just option to dedicated through plan and control organization but option for absolute
confidentiality then people will find a reason to take action with respect to unacceptable behavior
within an organization (Rowe and Hall,

Whistleblowers In The Workplace
A whistleblower is anyone who gains knowledge of illegal activities occurring in an organization
and reports this information to the proper authorities. Whistleblowers can be clients, contractors,
employees and suppliers. Whistleblowers can be any individual who somehow becomes aware of
illegal activities either through witnessing the behavior or being told about it. Companies can also
ask for employees to come forward if they witness another employee committing an illicit illegal
activity.
Whistleblowers can report or file the illicit illegal activity through the workplace but that could end
in retaliation by the employer. Whistleblowers can also file their complaints through the
occupational safety and health administration website. The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Shallal alleged that she did not file the claim because she believed she would be fired for doing so.
Shallal had an issue that occurred outside of her claim. Quinn then had Shallal fired because of that
other issue. Shallal alleged that firing her had something to do with her claim. She used the
whistleblower protection act to defend this thought. In a two to one decision, the court of appeals
ruled in her favor because her being fired was a direct order from Quinn. I completely agree with
this

NYPD Whistleblower Retaliation – Detective Labeled A Rat...
In 2005 NYPD Detective, first grade, James E. Griffith called internal affairs to report he was being
pressured by a fellow officer to lie and take the blame during an internal inquiry for the mishandling
of a homicide investigation by his unit (Goldstein, 2012). Another detective and union official
claimed in his deposition that Griffin was a rat because he went to internal affairs instead of the
union (Marzulli, 2013). According to the United States District Court Eastern District of New York's
memorandum of decision the retaliation was immediate, included adverse personnel actions and
continued though out his career in different units until Detective Griffith was effectively forced to
retire due to the harassment in 2009 (James Griffin ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"...while few indulge themselves in outright evil and fewer still in righteousness, people are
evidently influenced by authority, by apathy, by thoughtlessness, and by their environment (Geuras
& Garofalo, 2011, p. 112).The immediate supervisors at every post Griffith was assigned or escaped
to participated in the retribution by instigating and allowing the personal slurs, destruction of
property, the withholding or denial of benefits, and the refusal of other officers to work with Griffith
diminishing his ability to do his job. The very division Griffith went to in the first place, internal
affairs, was unable or unwilling to step in and hold anybody accountable for this behavior which
created a hostile working environment and promoted a universal unethical culture.
In this instance, Griffith would not be sheltered from retaliation under the traditional state and
federal whistleblower laws. Federal laws generally protect those that disclose fraud against the
government and state law NY Code 740 covers private sector and only when the complaint has been
brought to the supervisor first. In the complaint against the State of New York et al the District Court
ruled that Griffith's first amendment rights and first amendment retaliation claims would not be
summarily dismissed.
For four years, NYPD Detective first grade, James Griffith was ridiculed, belittled deprived of
benefits and generally persecuted for disclosing unethical and possibly illegal conduct to internal

Herve Falciani Whistleblower
In the article written by Martha Hamilton, Herve Falciani was a bank computer expert who became
a wanted man when he exposed HSBC bank in Sweden. He claimed it was done to expose unethical
behavior however, the bank claimed he was a disloyal employee who exposed the bank's practices
for personal gains. This paper will define key concepts, rationalize arguments for and against, give a
final position on the actions of Mr. Falciani.
Two main terms that will be encountered are whistleblower and loyal employee agent argument.
According to (Boatwright, 2012) whistleblowing "is the release of information by a former member
or member of an organization". This means that for whistleblowing to occur there must be a
correlation between the blower and the establishment in which the blower sees the company's
methods or practices ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Falciani was a trusted employee of the bank. He was also responsible for the positive changes the
previous branch of HSBC encountered. He was sent to Sweden to implement similar changes in this
branch however, his changes was met with much resilience from the employees in the branch. He
uncovered unethical practices being conducted as part of the bank's practice. It can be noted that Mr.
Falciani said he alerted bank officials about the problem however, nothing was done about it.
Further investigation of this article, showed HSBC bank had measures in place to report
whistleblowing there were two means. First, chat with line management or report to the
whistleblowing hotline. Additionally, HSBC had a lot of confidential information which its clients
were assured confidentiality. Mr. Falciani downloaded this information that he had privilege to. This
shows personal interest in the information gathered. The information exposed endangered the lives
of many persons and the public. This is because it caused the government to pursue persons who
were trying to get away from paying exorbitant

The Treatment of Whistleblowers Essay
It used to be that whistleblowers were applauded, and they still are in the private sector, but it seems
as if government whistleblowers are criticized and many are even criminally charged. There is
certainly a different take on their activities. In fact, some advocates counsel federal employees not to
come forward with information because if they do, their lives will be destroyed (Shulman, 2007).
What often happens is that they will never be able to work in their careers again in the same
capacity (Shulman, 2007). Many whistleblowers not only lose their jobs, but they lose their families
and friends, and much of their money ends up going to attorneys (Shulman, 2007). Indeed, in
today's day and age, there is a surge of whistleblowers ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It can take awhile for someone to speak up, and the hesitancy is largely due to a corporate culture
that does not support the practice. It should be noted that there are "whistle blowing" statutes in
many jurisdictions where an employee is allowed to report illegal activity and will be protected from
being fired (Larson, 2003). Indeed, whistle blowing is largely encouraged in society in general as
the government wants people to come forward when the giants of Corporate America are doing
something bad. Of course, when it comes to leaking government secrets that is a different matter
entirely. The National Whistleblowers Center says that under Section 403 of the Intelligence
Authorization Act, the head of an employee's agency may accuse a whistleblower of leaking
classified information (Burghardt, 2011). If this were to occur, the simple accusation could lead to
the individual's blocking of access to federal pensions, and this is true even if they are in retirement
(Burghardt, 2011). One case that involves a whistleblower who has been ostracized is Thomas
Drake. Drake is a former National Security Agency (NSA) employee (Bishop, 2011). The
government pursued him for years, and eventually he would plead guilty to just one misdemeanor in
that he used a computer without authorization (Bishop, 2011). What did Drake do exactly? Why is
he considered to be a whistleblower and why has he been persecuted by the government? Drake
warned the

Whistleblower Protection Act (1989)
WHISTLEBLOWER AND PROTECTION AFFORDED
According to Halbert & Ingulli (2015) a whistleblower is an individual that given information to the
employer, law enforcement or agencies about another individual or business that engage in illegal or
unethical practices (p.55). The Whistleblower Protection Act (1989) allows employee to file
complaints against their employer that the employer is retaliating and disclosing inappropriate
business activities. John can make a complaint that he is the Whistleblower because he gave the
attorney the internal memo acknowledging illegal activities. He had concerned about illegal and
unethical practices on behalf of PharmaCARE for the use of the drug AD23. Also advised the
attorney that PharmaCARE knew that the

Pros And Cons Of Whistleblowing
Introduction Whistleblowing has always been an important and controversial issue that employers
and employees need to understand and stay up to date with. They need to make sure that they know
what it means, what it involves, and what consequences are associated with whistleblowing.
Whistleblowing is defined as, "...an employee of a company or government agency makes a
protected disclosure to the public or authority regarding concerns for wrongdoing" (What is a
Whistleblower?, n.d.). In short, a whistleblower is defined as a person who is concerned and
discloses and divulges misbehavior in the workplace. This paper will focus on the pros and cons of
being a whistleblower, the ethics behind it, the details of s specific whistleblowing situation, and
reflect on my personal experience regarding whistleblowing.
Pros of being a whistleblower ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In an article written by Gerald Hanks titled, "Advantages & Disadvantages of Whistle–Blowing," he
states that these people who are labeled as whistleblowers are brave individuals who are willing to
speak up when they recognized wrongdoing (2018). These people are willing to jeopardize their
reputation and their careers to correct these unethical misconducts. Another positive benefit that
comes with being a whistleblower is that if the claims are to be proven, they will receive a
settlement/recovery. In the article, "Pros and Cons of becoming a Whistleblower," it states that the
whistleblowers are granted an annuity of the recoveries that come from their lawsuit (n.d). These
settlements are a way to encourage people to come forward and report any misconduct they might
witness or know about in their workplace. The fact that there are benefits involved with
whistleblowing and an ethical piece of mind makes these "insiders" go through the motions of
opening a can of worms and accuse the

The Medicare Bill

More Related Content

Similar to The Medicare Bill

More from Tammy Moncrief

Recently uploaded

The Medicare Bill