Whistle Blowing Essays

Whistleblowing In Health Care
Reporting fraud or illegal activity in a healthcare setting can sometimes be known as whistle
blowing. Whistle blowing can be referred to as someone alerting authorities when another person
is engaging in illegal or prohibited activities in the workplace. Some illegal activities that would be
associated with whistleblowing is a violation of a rule, law or regulation. There are different ways
of reporting prohibited activities in the healthcare setting, it just depends on what the activity is that
you are reporting. For example, how people report medicaid fraud. Medicaid is a government
program that provides health insurance to low income families that do not have sufficient medical
insurance or no medical insurance at all. There are different types of fraud that can be committed
involving medicaid. For example, billing for services not provided, billing for unnecessary medical
services, double billing, and false cost and price reports. Although, there are all different ways of
committing these frauds, billing for services not rendered is the most common type of fraud
committed. When you believe someone is committing any of these activities there is a set way or
protocol that you follow....show more content...
For the state of Georgia the contact would be the Georgia Department of Community Health. You
could contact them by email, or phone. When reporting the activity it is best to have as much
information as possible in order for the investigation process to happen in as timely a fashion as
possible. Having the name of the client, the client's card number, name of health care provider, and
the amount of money Medicaid approved or paid, can help speed along the process. After you have
provided the necessary information to the proper authorities you have completed the process of
reporting the illegal
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

The Ethics Of The Whistle Blower Essay
Question 5:–
Whistle–blowing:– Whistleblowing is the term connected to the reporting by workers of unlawful,
unethical, or illegitimate practices under the control of their businesses to parties who can make
restorative move (Elliston 1985). Whistleblowing is a questionable authoritative issue. On the
positive side, informants can help associations right risky items or working conditions and control
fake or inefficient practices.Hides the identity/Privacy:–As a HR we ensure the whistle blower that
we will not reveal his identity in front of all .This thing will never effect his working in future.
Job security and safety:– As a HR,we will provide him life time job security .
If we reveal their identity, we will definitely provide security to him. We will take care that he will
not face any problem to this act.
Motivation:– As HR we will motivate the whistle blower so that he can work in more effective way.
We can motivate him by giving him monetary /non monetary appraisal.
Multinational workforce:–
Multinational companies have long wrestled with the challenge of effectively governing and
managing a global workforce. Striking the right balance between a globally consistent strategy and
local flexibility requires ongoing monitoring, supported by a keen understanding of local regulations,
cultures and demographics.
Workforce strategies:–As a HR,we will make the strategies in such a way that each and every person
can take proper benefits of it.We keep every culture in the mind

Whistleblowers Essay
Debbie Laird
Whistleblowers
October 25, 2015
Law, Ethics and Corporate Government
Whistleblowers
The term "whistleblower" is sometimes referred to as snitch, rat, or disgruntled employee. In today's
business world with corruption such as that of Enron, which helped to make whistleblowing a
household term, employees who witness corrupt or unethical business practices taking place need to
have a channel and they need protection that if they blow the whistle, then they will be protected by
the US Government. Being a whistleblower takes courage as whistleblowing is not an easy thing to
do. To better understand whistleblowing, this paper attempts to define whistleblowers, the
characteristics of whistleblowing and what motivates...show more content...
The company promised to look into the matter. After a short period of time, the CEO resigned and
Blatchford, who was dissatisfied with the plan the publically traded company had to rectify the
situation, so he took the news to the Today Show (Reingold, 2015).
JC Penney responded by firing Blatchford and proceeded to sue him for theft of trade secrets. JC
Penney dropped the suit, but to this day, the whistleblowing case has not been settled. Blatchford
followed his instinct and reported the wrong doings, but did he go too far by appearing on the Today
Show? Probably, he should have proceeded with a different route after not getting the results he
thought were necessary to correct the problem. Instead of appearing on a national television
program, he should have contacted the correct government authorities and reported the problem in
that manner. But is he protected under the Whistleblower Act? Was he being retaliated against by
being fired? Probably, but considering he took his claims to national television, JC Penney saw no
other avenue but then to fire him.
Being a whistleblower takes courage, but it also takes common sense and some research on the
proper channels and proper authorities in which to report the wrong doing to. Whistleblowers need
to understand that there are laws in place to protect them from retaliation. While the JC Penney

The Ethics Of Whistle Blowing Essay
Whistle–blowing Whistle–blowing is a person who exposes any kind of information or activity that
is deemed illegal, unethical or not correct either private or public within an organization or company.
When an individual discovers evidence of malpractice or misconduct in an organization he/ she faces
an ethical dilemma in which a decision has to be made. Either present documentation or turn the
blind eye and not acknowledge the situation. Such information can be classified as a violation of
company policy, rules, and regulations or a threat to public interest, national security, as well as
fraud and corruption. Those that choose to become whistle–blowers can disclose their information
either internal or external. Internal, whistle–blower, is an individual that can bring information or
accusations to the attention of other people within the accused company such as a supervisor. The
supervisor then has to follow protocol and procedures to address the issue. However, if the
supervisor cannot contain the issue, it will escalate to a higher level of management. External
whistle–blowing allegations are brought forth by involving outside third party, such as media, law
enforcement, and government. In some cases, external whistleblowing is encouraged by offering
monetary rewards. There is also a third party service which utilizes an external agency to inform
upper management without disclosing the identity of the whistleblower. This action was developed
because of whistleblowing

Essay on Whistleblowing
Sharon Watkins earned her 15 minutes of fame the honest way, as the Enron employee who blew
the lid off of then CEO Ken Lay's debauchery. But for every celebrated whistleblower, there are
hundreds who remain in the shadows. And for good Samaritans who do tell their tale, the price they
pay can be exorbitant.
Whistleblowers perform in many careers and are found at all levels of an organization: scientists
and secretaries, lawyers and paralegals, managers and staff, security personnel and computer
specialists, etc. They are as varied in age, ethnic background, education, profession, sex, and income
as the population at large....show more content...
The whistleblower him or herself must be carefully scrutinized. What are the personal and the
professional reputations of the whistleblower? What is the motive driving the whistleblower? Is it to
benefit the client or the organization, or is it a need for attention or revenge? Is the whistleblower's
cause seen as legitimate and significant by trustworthy colleagues and friends? Is the whistleblower
aware of the potential consequences of blowing the whistle and still willing to accept responsibility
for actions taken?
Unfortunately, during most of this century many people equated whistleblowers with tattle tales. For
instance, until the early 1980s, legal indices often listed the law of whistleblowing under the word
"snitch" or "informant." During the Nixon era, much of that negative attitude changed. With the
advent of Watergate, the public began to recognize the service whistleblowers were providing to
taxpayers at great risk to themselves.
Further, whistleblowing impacts not just the whistleblower but also their family and friends.
Although whistleblowers have many different backgrounds, skills,

Consequences Of Whistleblowing
Registered nurses (RNs) have an ethical duty to ensure patient safety by reporting cases of
wrongdoing (American Nurses Association, 2015). Despite this ethical duty, RNs often meet
whistleblowing with resistance (Black, 2011; Jackson et al., 2014). Black (2011) cited an
unsupportive organizational climate as the greatest obstacle to whistleblowing. When RNs feel
unsupported by nurse leaders they develop a fear of repercussions, including labeling and blame
(Black, 2011). Jackson et al. (2014) explained that one–third of whistleblowing results in
consequences for the reporting RN and that feelings of resistance are therefore validated. Common
consequences include being alienated by an organization, managers, and colleagues. Such
consequences

Pros And Cons Of Whistleblowing
Introduction Whistleblowing has always been an important and controversial issue that employers
and employees need to understand and stay up to date with. They need to make sure that they know
what it means, what it involves, and what consequences are associated with whistleblowing.
Whistleblowing is defined as, "...an employee of a company or government agency makes a
protected disclosure to the public or authority regarding concerns for wrongdoing" (What is a
Whistleblower?, n.d.). In short, a whistleblower is defined as a person who is concerned and
discloses and divulges misbehavior in the workplace. This paper will focus on the pros and cons of
being a whistleblower, the ethics behind it, the details of s specific whistleblowing situation, and
reflect on my personal experience regarding whistleblowing.
Pros of being a whistleblower...show more content...
In an article written by Gerald Hanks titled, "Advantages & Disadvantages of Whistle–Blowing," he
states that these people who are labeled as whistleblowers are brave individuals who are willing to
speak up when they recognized wrongdoing (2018). These people are willing to jeopardize their
reputation and their careers to correct these unethical misconducts. Another positive benefit that
comes with being a whistleblower is that if the claims are to be proven, they will receive a
settlement/recovery. In the article, "Pros and Cons of becoming a Whistleblower," it states that the
whistleblowers are granted an annuity of the recoveries that come from their lawsuit (n.d). These
settlements are a way to encourage people to come forward and report any misconduct they might
witness or know about in their workplace. The fact that there are benefits involved with
whistleblowing and an ethical piece of mind makes these "insiders" go through the motions of
opening a can of worms and accuse the

Whistleblowing
Whistleblowing LEG 500
Whistleblowing in a Publicly Traded Company
Whistleblowing implies the imperative necessity to alert others (company) about immorality issues,
including illegal activity, happening inside the organization. For the employee who decides to blow
the whistle "usually brings to he/she undesirable consequences." Some consequences are like threats,
loss of employment, and social rejection. (Chiu,R. 2003)
Whistleblower Traits
Whistleblowers are characterized by strong ethic–moral values. They are perceived as an active
person with enough courage to expose the wrongdoing occurring inside their company. They are
"perceived as altruistically driven individuals who are steered by their attitudes."
The...show more content...
Ranbaxy agreed with FDA to don't produce drugs for USA until they meet the requirements specified
by American standards.
Whistleblowing Justification
Any pharmaceutical company Pharmaceutical, in North America, has to prove they are making
products "bioequivalent" or have the same results as the Original Medicine.
The whistleblower was aware that the company was falsifying documents, didn't meet the
requirements to produce drugs according with USA regulations. Whistleblower action was justified
because the fact that the company was making and selling medicine without scientific support it
might put in jeopardy the health of many people who were in taking the drug.
Whistleblower protection under the Sarbanes–Oxley Act
The Whistleblower was in protected under the Sarbanes–Oxley Act. Whistle blowing protection is
important for both Sarbanes Oxley and fraud protection. The Sarbanes –Oxley Act protect employees
from publicly traded companies from retaliation against them after report the wrongdoing. In India
where the company is located, whistleblowers don't have any protection.
In this particular case the investigation took eight years. Thakur contacted the FDA which was in
charge to not only investigate the case but to offer protection to him and his family.
The company faced civil penalties under the False Claims Act, "which allows citizens to bring civil
actions on behalf of the United States and share in any recovery." (McCafferty)

Disadvantages Of Whistleblowing
Should whistleblowing be encouraged or discouraged in organisations? This essay will serve to
provide a definition for whistleblowing whilst also touching on the advantages and disadvantages.
In doing so it will be clear as to why whistleblowing should be encouraged in organisations.
Whistleblowing has traditionally been defined as the act of bringing an organizations illegal and
immoral actions to light by a member of the organisations (Greenberg, 2011; Miceli, Near, Dworkin
& Miceli, 2008). It is also a method of defending rights, safe–guarding interests and justice as well as
righting wrongs (Berry, 2004). According to BjГёrkelo et al. (2011), whistleblowing can further
refer to an organizational social regulation apparatus in that it provides a means for employees to
hold one another accountable for abiding by not only the organization's moral and legal code but
also society's. Channels of whistleblowing can be both internal (within the organizations) or external
(media platforms such as newspapers), usually if nothing is resolved at an internal level it is then
taken to external channels (Miceli, Near, Dworkin & Miceli, 2008)....show more content...
Berry (2014) provides a similar explanation in claiming that employees crave consistency with their
organizations moral ethics and their own personal ones. If there is a clash in these value's the the
employee's organizational commitment and loyalty to the organization will be low. Whistleblowing
is therefore seen as a clash between one's organizational loyalty and one's loyalty to society
(Andrade,

Examples Of Whistleblowing
Q1: Whistle blowing The ethical issues surrounding whistle–blowing are often viewed as
controversial and difficult to analyze. This is mainly because whistle blowing may support or
negate from several values that are considered part of ethics. An example of when whistle
blowing is ethically required is when one witnesses blatant violation of the law. Let's take the
example of Ben who works in the accounting department at a large corporation. Ben joined the
organization only two years ago as an accounts assistant and works under Mr. Corgar, who is the
chief accountant at the firm. Mr. Corgar has been with the organization for 11 years now, and is
one of the most trusted employees. He has a very close relationship with the top management
including the C.E.O and the Operations manager. Part of Ben's job is to ensure that the company's
financial records are properly kept and submitted for auditing in the proper format and at the proper
time. The relationship between Ben and Mr. Corgar is good, but they have had their fair share of
arguments. This is because Ben has noticed Mr. Corgar using some unethical business practices to
alter some of the company's accounts. Particularly, a few months ago, Ben noticed that Mr. Corgar
...show more content...
Take the example of Mary, who has been working for a pharmaceutical company for seven years.
Mary has progressed through the corporate ladder well, and was recently eyeing the position of
operations manager. However, the company decided to promote James, who has been with the
company a year longer than Mary. Due to the disappointment of losing out on this position, Mary
decides to destroy the company's reputation. She starts sending anonymous emails to the FDA,
claiming that the company is distributing unapproved drugs to consumers. This type of whistle
blowing is unacceptable and ethically

Whistleblowing Essay
AC 4001 – Interim Assignment – 2012/2013
Name: James Nicholas Anthony Cassin
Student No: 109444602
Word Count: 1988
I don't agree with the statement provided that 'whistleblowing' is an enemy of business and creates
suspicion and disharmony. This is simply the old traditional view of the idea of whistleblowing that
there is a spy or snitch within the camp looking after his/her own interests. This old and traditional
view is largely based on the case that employee's within organisations had very little rights and they
weren't encouraged to be vocal about any misbehaviour or inappropriate dealings they would have
witnessed within the organisation. The idea that whistleblowing is encouraging a widespread
disunity within a firm is a purely...show more content...
This is to ensure that the whistleblowing allegations are dealt with in a fair and transparent manner
for the benefit of the employee and the organisation." So the obvious objective out of this of this act
is to ultimately benefit the organisation as a whole and make it more credible to public users who
use the organisation that the best practices are being implied and in turn everyone can feel confident
that the organisation is run right.
The point can be made that "whistleblowing" within a firm, large or small can be encouraged by
putting in place policies and a process within a firm that will protect the employee's and benefit the
organisation by: * Avoiding any unnecessary and unwanted publicity in the event that some of the
staff within the organisation are engaged in bad behaviour. * There may be the benefit of
generating positive publicity from a social responsibility perspective. * It may reinforce a culture of
values–based leadership and senior management accountability. * It may increase

The Ethics Of Whistle Blowing Essay
Whistle–blowing is a person who exposes any kind of information or activity that is deemed illegal,
unethical or not correct either private or public within an organization or company. When an
individual discovers evidence of malpractice or misconduct in an organization he/ she faces an
ethical dilemma in which a decision has to be made. Either present documentation or turn the blind
eye and not acknowledge the situation. Such information can be classified as a violation of company
policy, rules, and regulations or a threat to public interest, national security, as well as fraud and
corruption. Those that choose to become whistle–blowers can disclose their information either
internal or external. Internal, whistle–blower is an individual that can bring information or
accusations to the attention of other people within the accused company such as a supervisor. The
supervisor then has to follow protocol and procedures to address the issue. However, if the
supervisor cannot contain the issue, it will escalate to a higher level of management. External
whistle–blowing allegations are bought forth by involving outside third party such as media, law
enforcement and government. Internal whistle–blowing within an organization involves over 75 %
of employees of wrong doings such as vandalism, absenteeism and damages. Even though several
companies detect some misbehavior within the company, whistle–blowing was first presented as an
ethical issue over more than 20 years ago. Many

Whistleblower Essay examples
Case Studies: 4.1 & 5.2 Labor/Management Relations June 15, 2013 The labor and
management sides both have a great deal of power regarding workplace rules and conditions. The
management side has the power to choose the labor relations strategy that it thinks will best suit its
needs. The strategies chosen are determined by several things like "managerial philosophy, [or] the
ethics of its management" (Holley et al, 2008, pg 119). It seems as though today most large
organizations prefer a union avoidance approach, placing emphasis on "positive human resources
management" (Holley et al 2008, pg, 120). 4.1 In the case of Paul Sanchez, the labor side has the
power to sue the union if the employee's thinks they have violated...show more content...
All of this is done to give the employee more power over workplace rules and organization. 2One
reason leading up to the decision to seek union representation can be found in the alienation
theory presented by Holley et.al. Employees may come together to "engage in collective activities
to improve their working situation" (Holley et al, 2008, pg. 177). Their situation may include
dissatisfaction with "pay, supervision, and/or work" (Holley et al, 2008, pg. 177). This
dissatisfaction can lead to an employee taking what Hoyt Wheeler describes as "aggressive
action" (Holley et al, 2008, pg. 178). This action is usually followed by other workers sharing the
same viewpoints, banding together to take a collective action. This theoretic model can appear
when there is a disconnect between what the employee and employer believe to be fair. 3The
students would have several rights under the NLRA that they could not attain on their own. They
would be able to, among other things, "bargain collectively through representatives of employees
own choosing" (Employee Rights). They would also be able to negotiate for better working
conditions and fair wages and compensation, strengthening their power over the workplace rules
and organization. 4The NLRA definition of employee is based on the common law definition. It
says a person is an employee if, regarding the work, "you can control what will be done and how it
will be done" (IRS). This still hold

Whistle Blowing
Introduction
The challenger disaster that took place in January 28 has led to the explosion of the shuttle itself and
the death of all the crew members including the chosen teacher. A real disaster that occurred due to
some wrong decisions and overriding some important information from professional employees
within the company is considered a real catastrophe. Applying pressure on senior management team
of the company that has developed the rocket in order to change their opinion about launching can
be considered to be another catastrophe. All these misjudgment actions from the NASA team and the
Morton Thiokol team have lead to the challenger real crisis.
Whistle blowing
A whistle blower is a person who reveals some wrong actions done by...show more content...
on.

Whistleblowing Essay
Assignment 1: Whistleblowing and Sarbanes–Oxley
LEG500030VA016–11 (Law, Ethics & Corporate Governance
Professor Timothy Griffin
Strayer University
Jan Jones July 19, 2015
Describe the key characteristics of a whistleblower, and briefly summarize one (1) researched
instance of whistleblowing in one (1) publicly traded company within the last 12 months. Include the
details of the issue that the whistleblower reported and the effect of the whistleblower's actions on
both the whistleblower himself and the company.
A whistleblower is a person who exposes any kind of information or activity that is deemed illegal,
dishonest, or not correct within an organization that is either private or public. The information of
alleged...show more content...
Even though SEC didn't have to issue an award in the first case, Mike Delikat, a partner at Orrick
Herrington & Sutcliffe and chair of the firm's whistleblowing task force, thinks it may have
done so to send a message to companies that they need to take seriously the credible complaints of
wrongdoing they receive from their workers. He said SEC has been criticized for advocating that
employees can come to the agency first with information, even if their companies mandate they
report internally. This award is "like a demonstration that folks still are reporting internally but
companies aren't doing anything about it so we have to step in and whack those companies that don't
do anything," said Mr. Delikat. "That is my speculation."
L–3 responded exactly the way a publicly traded company is required to by Sarbanes–Oxley and
Dodd–Frank, sending the proper signal to whistleblowers that information about fraud is welcome
and will be acted upon, even if the results lead to short–term negative consequences for the business.
Whistleblowing cases reported to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) have increased by 35 per
cent in the past 12 months, according to new information obtained under the Freedom of Information
Act by Kroll, the global investigations firm. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) made
payouts

Whistle Blowing
Introduction The challenger disaster that took place in January 28 has led to the explosion of the
shuttle itself and the death of all the crew members including the chosen teacher. A real disaster that
occurred due to some wrong decisions and overriding some important information from professional
employees within the company is considered a real catastrophe. Applying pressure on senior
management team of the company that has developed the rocket in order to change their opinion
about launching can be considered to be another catastrophe. All these misjudgment actions from the
NASA team and the Morton Thiokol team have lead to the challenger real crisis. Whistle blowing A
whistle blower is a person who reveals some wrong actions...show more content...
People watching the launch and families who lost beloved ones needed to know what really
happened and who was responsible for their great loss. Children who were watching their teacher
joining the crew needed to know what the reason that this person died was. From all what
preceded the truth should have appeared and the company should not treated Boisjoly a whistle
blower because he showed the world what really happened and didn't take into consideration the
image of the company in the eyes of people and government. Failing to produce quality products
and putting lives on the edge is not something that can be ignored and from here we can easily say
that whistle blowers are heroes and not betrayers. Question 1:Do you regard Boisjoly as a
disloyal employee or a heroic whistle blower? Why? Boisjoly in my opinion is not a disloyal
employee. Although I agree to the saying that secrets of work should not be announced to anybody
outside the company but is mainly when there is something regarding progress and success key
elements and not wrongdoings that causes problems. In the case of challenger, seven people died
from the explosion. The company was aware of the problem and they decided to ignore it and go on
with the launch of the challenger. Boisjoly reported the problem and tried to convince the Morton
Thiokol to scrub the launch but NASA had their way to convince the management to ignore
everything and

The Treatment of Whistleblowers Essay
It used to be that whistleblowers were applauded, and they still are in the private sector, but it
seems as if government whistleblowers are criticized and many are even criminally charged.
There is certainly a different take on their activities. In fact, some advocates counsel federal
employees not to come forward with information because if they do, their lives will be destroyed
(Shulman, 2007). What often happens is that they will never be able to work in their careers again
in the same capacity (Shulman, 2007). Many whistleblowers not only lose their jobs, but they lose
their families and friends, and much of their money ends up going to attorneys (Shulman, 2007).
Indeed, in today's day and age, there is a surge of whistleblowers...show more content...
It can take awhile for someone to speak up, and the hesitancy is largely due to a corporate culture
that does not support the practice. It should be noted that there are "whistle blowing" statutes in
many jurisdictions where an employee is allowed to report illegal activity and will be protected
from being fired (Larson, 2003). Indeed, whistle blowing is largely encouraged in society in general
as the government wants people to come forward when the giants of Corporate America are doing
something bad. Of course, when it comes to leaking government secrets that is a different matter
entirely. The National Whistleblowers Center says that under Section 403 of the Intelligence
Authorization Act, the head of an employee's agency may accuse a whistleblower of leaking
classified information (Burghardt, 2011). If this were to occur, the simple accusation could lead
to the individual's blocking of access to federal pensions, and this is true even if they are in
retirement (Burghardt, 2011). One case that involves a whistleblower who has been ostracized is
Thomas Drake. Drake is a former National Security Agency (NSA) employee (Bishop, 2011). The
government pursued him for years, and eventually he would plead guilty to just one misdemeanor in
that he used a computer without authorization (Bishop, 2011). What did Drake do exactly? Why is
he considered to be a whistleblower and why has he been persecuted by the government? Drake
warned the

Whistle-Blowing In The Workplace Essay
Whistle–blowing in the workplace: Do we stand by and allow business corruption as usual or
prepare to take a fall for something? It sometimes requires uncommon courage, as whistle–blowing in
the workplace is not so easy to do. What motivates you? Is it revenge, ethics or a combination? To
take a closer look, let's consider what is whistle blowing and explore a few conditions used to justify
whistle–blowing, and concluded with how companies can benefit from a whistle–blowing policy.
What is a whistle–blower or whistle–blowing? Let's make it clear that informers and snitches are
individuals, who reveal information for personal enrichment or a means to get at others. However,
whistle–blowers like Bobby Boutris a Federal Aviation...show more content...
Even though whistle–blowing can be justified in some situations, it sadly remains that courageous
employees who perform a valuable public service are often subjected to harsh retaliation. Ironically
for this particular case, Laura Brown, an FAA spokeswoman, told CNN that the administration has
taken action and that a supervisor who was in charge of overseeing Southwest is "no longer in a
supervisory position." Is whistle–blowing of corruption and mismanagement in government and
industry the best way to correct these faults? To explore this question, we would have to consider a
few conditions for justification of whistle–blowing. Thousand of employees lost their employment,
retirement benefits and saving plans while corporate officers ran off with the company wealth,
making an ugly dent in the history of the Corporate Sector in USA. A coverup of corporate greed
is an appropriate situation for disclosure because people's lives are at stake. First, we need to ask
how serious is the situation of sufficient moral importance to justify whistle–blowing? When
employees discover unethical, immoral, illegal transactions or potentially damaging information for
the well being of the workplace in which they are employed, they are expected to disclose this
sensitive information to an authority in the hierarchy through a formal/informal mechanism. Even
with the moral importance of the situation, there should

Whistleblowing And Its Impact On Organizations
Whistleblowing is the name generated from the need to increase awareness in organizations.
Whistleblowers identify weaknesses, neglect, and abuses within the organization and then raise an
alarm to inform the public that their very interests in the organization are at stake. For example, a
teacher who informs educational officers of lavish lifestyles and misappropriation of resources by
school heads, a cabinet secretary who informs the Congress of misuse of resources in the cabinet. As
they perform this, the whistleblowers know very well that their actions can have very adverse
implications to their careers and to those whom they denounce, either their juniors or seniors. Some
individuals justify whistleblowing and say that it is an important thing to do to uphold organization's
morals and ethics; others think that it is not necessary, and they try to prevent organizations from
getting to the level of whistleblowing. The most important thing is to understand that whistleblowing
is beneficial and ought to be balanced so as to avoid any demerits. The managements ought to
understand that the chief intention of whistleblowing is to make operations more efficient and to
avoid future occurrences that can otherwise collapse the whole organization. For example, a
whistleblower may inform of a major orchestrated scandal which could otherwise drain all of the
organization's resources and profits.
Is whistleblowing all necessary?
Since we may consider whistleblowing as desirable,

Whistle-Blowing: Enron Essay
Whistle blowing is an act to disclose an organizational wrongdoing to parties that can take action.
Sherron Watkins was the vice president of Enron Corporation that became a whistle blower in 2001.
She sent an anonymous memo to Enron Chairman Kenneth Lay regarding the misstatements on the
financial report. Enron hired lawyers from Vinson & Elkins to do an investigation on the financial
misstatement allegations (Ackman, 2002). According to the memo from the investigations, after
Watkins identified herself Lay held a meeting with her to discuss about her concerns regarding her
allegations. The memo failed to indicate what Lay told Watkins. The investigation from Vinson &
Elkins concluded that the questionable transaction that Watkins was...show more content...
Whistle Blowing Policy According to Ravishankar (2003), it is better to address an employee's
concern when it is still minor before it became public and causes much damage to the company. It is
beneficial for companies to create an organizational culture that encourages early reporting by
employees to the attention of their superiors by "internal whistleblowers". Companies can introduce
whistle blowing policy to their employees to encourage them to voice out if they have legitimate
concerns about wrongdoings. Also, company can create a code of conduct to set rules for
employees to make reference to laws, rules, regulation and directives applying to that company. The
code helps employees to know about their obligations to the company and to their colleagues.
Advantages of Whistle Blowing Policy A lot of times, employees that found out about a violation
of internal rules or external laws are too afraid to speak out because they are fearful about losing
their job. The application of whistle blowing policy assures the employees that they will not be
subject to reprisal as long as their concerns are legitimate. By speaking up once the problem is
spotted, superiors became aware about the early warnings and the concerns are more likely to be
addressed internally. This reduces the risk of having external regulators to be

Whistle Blowing Essays

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Whistle Blowing Essays

Similar to Whistle Blowing Essays (7)

More from Paper Writing Services

More from Paper Writing Services (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Whistle Blowing Essays