Download to read offline
Uploaded byBjörn Brembs
The evolutionary conserved neurobiology of operant learning
The document discusses various learning systems and behavioral variability in animals, referencing studies on Aplysia, Drosophila, and mice. It explores concepts of operant and classical conditioning, long-term memory mechanisms, and the role of specific proteins in synaptic plasticity. The content is derived from comparative psychology literature and emphasizes evolutionary perspectives on learning and behavior.
More Related Content
Similar to The evolutionary conserved neurobiology of operant learning
More from Björn Brembs
The evolutionary conserved neurobiology of operant learning
- 1.
- 2. Tone Food Tone: Conditionedstimulus – CS Food: Unconditioned Stimulus – US
- 5. > 530 Mya CREB CRE Long- term memory cAMP PKA Cytoplasm Nucleus Nt DNA rutabaga Modifiedfrom: "Comparative psychology: Evolution and development of behavior" (2nd Edition, Psychology Press, 2008)
- 6. CS US Tone Food Lever- pressingFood Behavior Reinforcement
- 8. > 530 Mya CREB CRE Long- term memory cAMP PKA Cytoplasm Nucleus Nt DNA rutabaga Modifiedfrom: "Comparative psychology: Evolution and development of behavior" (2nd Edition, Psychology Press, 2008)
- 9.
- 11. Behavioral variability ina constant stimulus situation:
- 12.
- 13. > 530 Mya CREB CRE Long- term memory cAMP PKA Cytoplasm Nucleus Nt DNA rutabaga Modifiedfrom: "Comparative psychology: Evolution and development of behavior" (2nd Edition, Psychology Press, 2008)
- 14. Brembs & Plendl(2008) Torque HeatColors Torque Heat rut-AC dependent Synaptic Plasticity Protein Kinase C world self rut2080 wtb rut2080 wtb HS noHS PKCi PKCi HS noHS PKCi PKCi
- 15. PKC but notrut-AC involved in Aplysia self-learning Aplysia californica F. Lorenzetti, D. Baxter, J. Byrne (2008): Neuron 59, 815-828
- 16. PKC involved inself-motion learning Rochefort C, Arabo A, André M, Poucet B, Save E, Rondi-Reig L. (2011) Science 334(6054):385-389
- 18.
- 19.
- 20. Action – OutcomeEvaluation Torque Heat
- 21. Generate spontaneous actions(trying out)
- 22. Shape behavior byevaluating sensory feedbac
- 23. Action – OutcomeEvaluation FoxP2
- 27.
- 28.
- 29. Why have morethan one learning system?
- 30.
- 31. PI = (tc- th) / (tc + th)
- 32. Brembs & Heisenberg(2000) L & M ‘Master’: operant ‘Replay’: classical
- 34. Training Test composite: turning +color turning
- 35. Training Test composite: turning +color turning WT WT 16min MB Impaired OK OK Self-Learning Test
- 36. Training Test composite: turning +color turning color WT WT 16min MB Impaired OK OK Self-Learning Test WT WT 16min MB OK Impaired Impaired World-Learning Test
- 37. Training Test composite: turning +color turning color WT 8min WT 16min MB Impaired OK OK Self-Learning Test WT 8min WT 16min MB OK Impaired Impaired World-Learning Test habit formation
- 38. Training Test composite: turning +color turning color WT 8min WT 16min FoxP 16min Impaired OK Impaired Self-Learning Test WT 8min WT 16min MB OK Impaired Impaired World-Learning Test
- 39. Training Test composite: turning +color turning color WT 8min WT 16min MB 8min Impaired OK OK Self-Learning Test WT 8min WT 16min MB 8min OK Impaired Impaired World-Learning Test Brembs, 2009 MB247 or 17D driving TNT
- 40. Brembs (2009) CurrBiol Colomb & Brembs (2010) Commun Integr Biol Brembs (2010) Proc Roy Soc Brembs (2011) Behav Proc
- 41. Spontaneous Activity independent ofsensory input e.g. exploration Mixed Complex stimuli/variable actions Behavioral set Endogenous evoked responses Closed loop Evoked Fixed stimulus/response at fixed latency e.g. reflex, habit Stimulus-response coupling Predictability
- 42. Spontaneous Activity independent ofsensory input e.g. exploration Mixed Complex stimuli/variable actions Behavioral set Endogenous evoked responses Closed loop Evoked Fixed stimulus/response at fixed latency e.g. reflex, habit Stimulus-response coupling Predictability/Efficiency
- 43.
- 44.
- 45.
- 46.