Texas STaR Chart In-Service
•Download as PPT, PDF•
1 like•196 views
This presentation introduces the Texas STaR Chart, a teacher self-assessment tool aligned to the state's technology plan. It discusses the four key areas and classification ranges of the chart. Data analysis found the school was at an advanced level in teaching and learning, educator preparation, and infrastructure, with some areas needing improvement. Recommendations include increasing technology integration, standards awareness, resource allocation, and dedicating personnel to instructional technology best practices.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
S ta r chart
The document discusses Weatherford High School's use of the Texas STaR Chart to evaluate its progress in integrating technology. The STaR Chart measures four areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation, Leadership and Support, and Infrastructure. An analysis found Weatherford's infrastructure and teaching/learning met advanced or target levels, but educator preparation was its weakest area and in need of improvement to increase technology professional development opportunities for teachers. The school's long-term goal is to achieve target level ratings in all four STaR Chart areas.
star
The document summarizes the purpose and findings of the Texas School Technology and Readiness (STaR) Chart, a tool used for technology planning, budgeting, and evaluation in Texas schools. It discusses the chart's four domains of evaluation and shows the progress made by one campus from 2006-2008. While the campus showed growth in Teaching and Learning and Educator Preparation, it demonstrated little to no growth in Leadership, Administration, and Infrastructure for Technology over the three-year period.
Star chart
The STaR Chart Report 2011 document provides information about the STaR (School Technology and Readiness) Chart, a tool for teachers to assess their professional development needs and classroom technology. The STaR Chart can help determine funding priorities, support grant applications, and conceptualize the school's technology vision. It also helps document how schools are using federal funds. The document discusses how the STaR Chart is aligned with Texas' long-range technology plan and goals to have highly trained students prepared for post-secondary education. Key areas assessed include teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and support, and infrastructure. Trends from 2006-2010 STaR reports showed curriculum needed better alignment with technology skills but students lacked
Texas S Ta R Chart Pp1
The document discusses a School Technology and Readiness (STaR) Chart that is used to evaluate a campus's progress in integrating technology based on goals in the district's long-range technology plan. The STaR Chart examines teaching and learning, educator preparation, administration and support, and infrastructure using a four-point scale. It provides results from North Garland High School's 2008-2009 STaR Chart which showed they were meeting technology application standards but needed to increase resources, reallocate budgets, focus on students, and provide on-demand classroom access.
STaR Chart
The document discusses the STaR Chart, a tool for assessing effective technology integration across the curriculum. The STaR Chart is aligned with Texas' Long Range Plan for Technology and must be completed annually by teachers, campuses, and districts. It covers four key areas: Teaching & Learning, Educator Preparation & Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure. The document provides an overview of focus areas within each key area and progress levels. It summarizes Klein Forest High School's STaR Chart assessments over three years, noting improvement in infrastructure support but need to address teaching and learning areas like classroom technology use.
Texas S Ta R Chart
The document discusses the Texas STaR Chart, which is used to track a school's progress in integrating technology. It provides the STaR Chart ratings of Early Tech, Developing Tech, Advanced Tech, and Target Tech. For South Oak Cliff High School, it shows their STaR Chart scores from 2006-2007 to 2008-2009, which were mostly in the Developing Tech or Advanced Tech levels. The data from the STaR Chart is used for technology planning, budgeting, and assessing progress in meeting technology development goals.
S ta r chart
The STaR Chart was developed by Texas to help schools assess their technology use and readiness based on four key areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and infrastructure. It provides progress levels from early to target technology use. According to a campus summary, the school dropped from advanced to developing technology use from 2007-2008 to 2008-2009 but infrastructure support increased in 2009-2010. The conclusion states that the STaR Chart is a valuable planning tool to help ensure students are technology literate by 8th grade as required.
Malone school
The Malone School uses the Texas Campus Star Chart to evaluate its progress in technology each year. In 2006-2007, teaching and learning were at the developing stage while infrastructure was at the target level. In 2007-2008, educator preparation and development significantly increased. In 2008-2009, all areas remained the same. The school evaluates the star chart yearly to ensure compliance and address needs.
Recommended
S ta r chart
The document discusses Weatherford High School's use of the Texas STaR Chart to evaluate its progress in integrating technology. The STaR Chart measures four areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation, Leadership and Support, and Infrastructure. An analysis found Weatherford's infrastructure and teaching/learning met advanced or target levels, but educator preparation was its weakest area and in need of improvement to increase technology professional development opportunities for teachers. The school's long-term goal is to achieve target level ratings in all four STaR Chart areas.
star
The document summarizes the purpose and findings of the Texas School Technology and Readiness (STaR) Chart, a tool used for technology planning, budgeting, and evaluation in Texas schools. It discusses the chart's four domains of evaluation and shows the progress made by one campus from 2006-2008. While the campus showed growth in Teaching and Learning and Educator Preparation, it demonstrated little to no growth in Leadership, Administration, and Infrastructure for Technology over the three-year period.
Star chart
The STaR Chart Report 2011 document provides information about the STaR (School Technology and Readiness) Chart, a tool for teachers to assess their professional development needs and classroom technology. The STaR Chart can help determine funding priorities, support grant applications, and conceptualize the school's technology vision. It also helps document how schools are using federal funds. The document discusses how the STaR Chart is aligned with Texas' long-range technology plan and goals to have highly trained students prepared for post-secondary education. Key areas assessed include teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and support, and infrastructure. Trends from 2006-2010 STaR reports showed curriculum needed better alignment with technology skills but students lacked
Texas S Ta R Chart Pp1
The document discusses a School Technology and Readiness (STaR) Chart that is used to evaluate a campus's progress in integrating technology based on goals in the district's long-range technology plan. The STaR Chart examines teaching and learning, educator preparation, administration and support, and infrastructure using a four-point scale. It provides results from North Garland High School's 2008-2009 STaR Chart which showed they were meeting technology application standards but needed to increase resources, reallocate budgets, focus on students, and provide on-demand classroom access.
STaR Chart
The document discusses the STaR Chart, a tool for assessing effective technology integration across the curriculum. The STaR Chart is aligned with Texas' Long Range Plan for Technology and must be completed annually by teachers, campuses, and districts. It covers four key areas: Teaching & Learning, Educator Preparation & Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure. The document provides an overview of focus areas within each key area and progress levels. It summarizes Klein Forest High School's STaR Chart assessments over three years, noting improvement in infrastructure support but need to address teaching and learning areas like classroom technology use.
Texas S Ta R Chart
The document discusses the Texas STaR Chart, which is used to track a school's progress in integrating technology. It provides the STaR Chart ratings of Early Tech, Developing Tech, Advanced Tech, and Target Tech. For South Oak Cliff High School, it shows their STaR Chart scores from 2006-2007 to 2008-2009, which were mostly in the Developing Tech or Advanced Tech levels. The data from the STaR Chart is used for technology planning, budgeting, and assessing progress in meeting technology development goals.
S ta r chart
The STaR Chart was developed by Texas to help schools assess their technology use and readiness based on four key areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and infrastructure. It provides progress levels from early to target technology use. According to a campus summary, the school dropped from advanced to developing technology use from 2007-2008 to 2008-2009 but infrastructure support increased in 2009-2010. The conclusion states that the STaR Chart is a valuable planning tool to help ensure students are technology literate by 8th grade as required.
Malone school
The Malone School uses the Texas Campus Star Chart to evaluate its progress in technology each year. In 2006-2007, teaching and learning were at the developing stage while infrastructure was at the target level. In 2007-2008, educator preparation and development significantly increased. In 2008-2009, all areas remained the same. The school evaluates the star chart yearly to ensure compliance and address needs.
Star Chart RHS
The document summarizes Richardson High School's 2008-2009 technology plan. It discusses preparing 21st century students, assessing technology skills using the STaR Chart survey tool, and identifying areas for improvement based on the STaR Chart ratings. The plan aims to integrate technology into all aspects of teaching, learning, administration, and infrastructure to meet state and district technology goals.
Texas STaR Chart Presentation
The STaR Chart is a survey that helps schools evaluate their progress in meeting technology goals. It assesses four areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and infrastructure. Schools receive a classification of early, developing, advanced or target tech. Nikki Rowe High School's results showed developing in all areas. The data can help identify training needs and funding priorities to improve technology use. The school plans to review results, determine strengths and weaknesses, and develop a technology plan to guide students' daily use of tools.
Hilltop Elementary S Ta R Chart Results
This document discusses the results of Hilltop Elementary School's Texas STaR Chart assessment, which evaluates the school's technology readiness and integration. The school scored in the developing to advanced range but aims to reach target levels in two categories by the next assessment. Goals include providing teachers with more technology professional development and increasing student access to technology both at school and outside of it. The school seeks input on improving its rating and integrating technology more in classrooms.
P Pweek2
The document is a technology assessment report for a school called GHS. It rated the school's technology use in four key areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership/administration, and infrastructure. GHS received ratings of "Developing" in the first three areas and "Advanced" for infrastructure. The report's goals are to provide leadership and vision for new technology, offer professional development for teachers, and bring online learning to classrooms. It recommends bringing in a technology specialist for support and training and seeking new tech resources for the classroom.
Texas STaR Chart Presentation
This document summarizes a STaR Chart report for Riddle Elementary over three years from 2007-2008 to 2009-2010. The STaR Chart is used by Texas to evaluate schools' progress in meeting technology goals and includes four key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Instructional Support, and Infrastructure for Technology. Each area has multiple focus areas and is rated from Early Tech to Target Tech. The summary provides Riddle Elementary's ratings over three years and asks what areas show strengths to maintain and weaknesses to improve to reach Advanced Tech or higher in all key areas.
The Future Is Now
The document discusses the Texas STaR Charts, which are assessment tools developed around the four key areas of the Texas Long Range Plan for Technology. The Texas Teacher STaR Chart must be completed by all teachers and is used for technology planning. The Texas Campus STaR Chart produces a profile of a campus's status in reaching technology goals and is submitted by principals. Sample data from the Conroe ISD shows their progress in the four key areas from 2006-2007 to 2008-2009.
Texas STaR Chart - MBE
The STaR Chart is a tool used in Texas to measure schools' use of technology across four domains: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and infrastructure. Schools can be rated at four levels from early to target tech. Maplebrook Elementary recently completed their STaR Chart and found their rating had dropped over the past year, indicating areas that need improvement according to their campus improvement plan to increase technology use.
STaR Chart
This document summarizes Mackey Elementary School's progress on the Texas Campus STaR Chart from 2006-2007 through 2008-2009. It shows improvement in two key areas - Teaching and Learning and Educator Preparation and Development - advancing from Developing Tech to Advanced Tech. Leadership, Administration, and Instructional Support and Infrastructure for Technology maintained an Advanced Tech rating. Reaching the highest Target Tech level requires increasing access to appropriate technology resources anytime for integrated learning activities, participation in developing new learning strategies, and access to the internet through computers at all times.
Texas Star Chart
The document discusses Texas' Long-Range Technology Plan from 2006-2020 and how it aims to provide every student with a world-class education through focus on four key areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation and development, leadership and administration, and technology infrastructure. It also discusses how the Texas STaR Chart is used to track schools' progress in these areas annually based on surveys. Specifics on how the plan addresses technology standards for different grade levels through the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) are provided. Finally, it summarizes one school's progress over three years based on its STaR Chart results, finding it is advancing towards the plan's target technology level.
STaR Chart
The document discusses the STaR Chart, a tool used by schools to assess technology readiness in four key areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and administration, and infrastructure. It explains that the STaR Chart is mandated by No Child Left Behind and helps determine if students are prepared for the digital 21st century. While the school's infrastructure and technology is a strength, its main weakness is educator preparation and development. The document suggests resources teachers can use to learn more and improve in this area.
Texas S Ta R Chart
The document summarizes Johnston Elementary School's progress according to the Texas STaR Chart, which measures schools' technology status in four domains: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure. According to the chart, Johnston started at an advanced level in Teaching and Learning but dropped to developing. Educator Preparation declined to developing. Leadership/Administration/Support remained at advanced. Infrastructure was the strongest area. The summary identifies incorporating more technology in lessons, providing development time, and increasing instructional support as areas for improvement.
STaR Chart Presentation
This document summarizes the results of a STaR Chart evaluation of technology at Tomball Elementary School. It shows that the school has made slow but steady progress in developing its educational technology infrastructure over the past three years. All areas received a "Developing Tech" rating, though infrastructure and educator preparation saw the least growth. The document encourages continued focus on improving technology to keep up with advances.
Jennifer Myers Edld 5352 Campus S Ta R Chart Power Point Presentation ...
The document discusses Cross Timbers Intermediate School's (CTIS) progress according to the Texas STaR Chart, which measures technology readiness in schools. It provides definitions of the STaR Chart and outlines its four focus areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Support, and Infrastructure. Data shows CTIS has improved in each area over the past three years, moving from "Early" to "Developing" or "Advanced" readiness. The conclusion recommends CTIS continue funding infrastructure and providing teacher training to further technology integration.
Texas star chart claridy
The Texas Star Chart is a self-assessment rubric developed by the Texas Educational Agency to help K-12 schools and districts evaluate their technology integration and readiness. It is aligned with Texas's long-range technology plan and covers four key areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and support, and infrastructure. Schools and districts use the chart to assess their progress, identify areas for improvement, and establish technology standards and frameworks. Results are reported publicly to stakeholders. The chart presents ongoing challenges to accelerate technology use for 21st century skills as technology and workforce needs change rapidly.
Texas Campus S Ta R Chart
The document discusses the Texas STaR Chart, which measures schools' use of technology to support student learning. It describes the four key areas assessed by the STaR Chart: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and infrastructure. Schools are rated at one of four levels - Early Tech, Developing Tech, Advanced Tech, or Target Tech - based on their use of technology in these areas. The document then provides Cullen Middle School's own STaR Chart summary and ratings over recent years, concluding with suggestions for how the school can improve its rating on the chart.
Star ChartPresentation
This document provides an overview of the Star Chart Program used by Faith Family Academy of Oak Cliff to analyze technology integration. The Star Chart is designed to measure progress in four key areas based on Texas' Long-Range Technology Plan and No Child Left Behind requirements. The data shows that Faith Family Academy has achieved advanced levels in infrastructure but has been developing in other areas like teaching and learning, with some marginal trends upward. The Star Chart can help teachers determine professional development needs and provide data to support funding and resource priorities.
Indicators of instructional leadership
The document outlines indicators of instructional leadership in a school including that the school's mission and vision are clearly stated, the curriculum is aligned with goals, and a monitoring plan is established and implemented to regularly observe teachers and address development needs while making data-based decisions and promoting student achievement, learning, and partnerships with parents.
Instructional leadership domains
The document discusses the roles and responsibilities of school heads as instructional leaders. It begins by defining leadership and then outlines 7 points related to school heads' expectations, core functions, developing leadership skills, roles in achieving instructional goals, personal leadership styles, and domains of responsibility. It further discusses instructional leadership, grouping teacher expectations, and indicators of active instructional leadership. School heads are responsible for strategic leadership, instructional leadership, managerial resources, human resources, cultural leadership, micropolitical leadership, and external development leadership. Their main responsibilities include school management, school communications, school community relations, and instructional supervision.
Instructional Leadership: Creating the Conditions #leadership20
Presentation given on October 30, 2012 as part of the #Leadership20 learning series MOOC. Inquires about and describes successful strategies and ideas to create instructional leadership in schools.
The Instructional leader: TOwards School Improvement
This slide contains (1) Purpose of instructional leadership, (2) What is instructional leadership? (3) Curriculum involvement
Functions of an instructional leader, (4) Roles of the instructional leader (5) Characteristics of instructional leadership, (5) Activities of instructional leadership, (6) Effective instructional leaders, (7) Instructionally effective schools, and (8)
Philippine Professional Standards for Teaching.
Becoming an Exemplary Instructional Leader
The document discusses instructional leadership and the role of the principal. It outlines several key concepts of instructional leadership including being principal-centered, having a high focus on curriculum and instruction, setting clear goals, allocating resources, and monitoring teaching and learning. It also discusses qualities of instructional leaders including knowledge, confidence, and enthusiasm. The principal must be an expert in teaching and learning, provide resources and support to teachers, and act as an instructional resource through open communication and visible classroom presence.
Instructional Leadership
An overview Instructional Leadership, Educator Effectiveness and the Teacher-Principal Partnership.
Discover best practices and staff development tools with this in-depth brief on SB-191 implementation
Highlights
• The importance of Instructional Leadership
• Understanding the rubric
• Making the shift
• The teacher-principal partnership
• Developing teacher leaders
• Fostering talent
• Peer practices
More Related Content
What's hot
Star Chart RHS
The document summarizes Richardson High School's 2008-2009 technology plan. It discusses preparing 21st century students, assessing technology skills using the STaR Chart survey tool, and identifying areas for improvement based on the STaR Chart ratings. The plan aims to integrate technology into all aspects of teaching, learning, administration, and infrastructure to meet state and district technology goals.
Texas STaR Chart Presentation
The STaR Chart is a survey that helps schools evaluate their progress in meeting technology goals. It assesses four areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and infrastructure. Schools receive a classification of early, developing, advanced or target tech. Nikki Rowe High School's results showed developing in all areas. The data can help identify training needs and funding priorities to improve technology use. The school plans to review results, determine strengths and weaknesses, and develop a technology plan to guide students' daily use of tools.
Hilltop Elementary S Ta R Chart Results
This document discusses the results of Hilltop Elementary School's Texas STaR Chart assessment, which evaluates the school's technology readiness and integration. The school scored in the developing to advanced range but aims to reach target levels in two categories by the next assessment. Goals include providing teachers with more technology professional development and increasing student access to technology both at school and outside of it. The school seeks input on improving its rating and integrating technology more in classrooms.
P Pweek2
The document is a technology assessment report for a school called GHS. It rated the school's technology use in four key areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership/administration, and infrastructure. GHS received ratings of "Developing" in the first three areas and "Advanced" for infrastructure. The report's goals are to provide leadership and vision for new technology, offer professional development for teachers, and bring online learning to classrooms. It recommends bringing in a technology specialist for support and training and seeking new tech resources for the classroom.
Texas STaR Chart Presentation
This document summarizes a STaR Chart report for Riddle Elementary over three years from 2007-2008 to 2009-2010. The STaR Chart is used by Texas to evaluate schools' progress in meeting technology goals and includes four key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Instructional Support, and Infrastructure for Technology. Each area has multiple focus areas and is rated from Early Tech to Target Tech. The summary provides Riddle Elementary's ratings over three years and asks what areas show strengths to maintain and weaknesses to improve to reach Advanced Tech or higher in all key areas.
The Future Is Now
The document discusses the Texas STaR Charts, which are assessment tools developed around the four key areas of the Texas Long Range Plan for Technology. The Texas Teacher STaR Chart must be completed by all teachers and is used for technology planning. The Texas Campus STaR Chart produces a profile of a campus's status in reaching technology goals and is submitted by principals. Sample data from the Conroe ISD shows their progress in the four key areas from 2006-2007 to 2008-2009.
Texas STaR Chart - MBE
The STaR Chart is a tool used in Texas to measure schools' use of technology across four domains: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and infrastructure. Schools can be rated at four levels from early to target tech. Maplebrook Elementary recently completed their STaR Chart and found their rating had dropped over the past year, indicating areas that need improvement according to their campus improvement plan to increase technology use.
STaR Chart
This document summarizes Mackey Elementary School's progress on the Texas Campus STaR Chart from 2006-2007 through 2008-2009. It shows improvement in two key areas - Teaching and Learning and Educator Preparation and Development - advancing from Developing Tech to Advanced Tech. Leadership, Administration, and Instructional Support and Infrastructure for Technology maintained an Advanced Tech rating. Reaching the highest Target Tech level requires increasing access to appropriate technology resources anytime for integrated learning activities, participation in developing new learning strategies, and access to the internet through computers at all times.
Texas Star Chart
The document discusses Texas' Long-Range Technology Plan from 2006-2020 and how it aims to provide every student with a world-class education through focus on four key areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation and development, leadership and administration, and technology infrastructure. It also discusses how the Texas STaR Chart is used to track schools' progress in these areas annually based on surveys. Specifics on how the plan addresses technology standards for different grade levels through the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) are provided. Finally, it summarizes one school's progress over three years based on its STaR Chart results, finding it is advancing towards the plan's target technology level.
STaR Chart
The document discusses the STaR Chart, a tool used by schools to assess technology readiness in four key areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and administration, and infrastructure. It explains that the STaR Chart is mandated by No Child Left Behind and helps determine if students are prepared for the digital 21st century. While the school's infrastructure and technology is a strength, its main weakness is educator preparation and development. The document suggests resources teachers can use to learn more and improve in this area.
Texas S Ta R Chart
The document summarizes Johnston Elementary School's progress according to the Texas STaR Chart, which measures schools' technology status in four domains: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure. According to the chart, Johnston started at an advanced level in Teaching and Learning but dropped to developing. Educator Preparation declined to developing. Leadership/Administration/Support remained at advanced. Infrastructure was the strongest area. The summary identifies incorporating more technology in lessons, providing development time, and increasing instructional support as areas for improvement.
STaR Chart Presentation
This document summarizes the results of a STaR Chart evaluation of technology at Tomball Elementary School. It shows that the school has made slow but steady progress in developing its educational technology infrastructure over the past three years. All areas received a "Developing Tech" rating, though infrastructure and educator preparation saw the least growth. The document encourages continued focus on improving technology to keep up with advances.
Jennifer Myers Edld 5352 Campus S Ta R Chart Power Point Presentation ...
The document discusses Cross Timbers Intermediate School's (CTIS) progress according to the Texas STaR Chart, which measures technology readiness in schools. It provides definitions of the STaR Chart and outlines its four focus areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Support, and Infrastructure. Data shows CTIS has improved in each area over the past three years, moving from "Early" to "Developing" or "Advanced" readiness. The conclusion recommends CTIS continue funding infrastructure and providing teacher training to further technology integration.
Texas star chart claridy
The Texas Star Chart is a self-assessment rubric developed by the Texas Educational Agency to help K-12 schools and districts evaluate their technology integration and readiness. It is aligned with Texas's long-range technology plan and covers four key areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and support, and infrastructure. Schools and districts use the chart to assess their progress, identify areas for improvement, and establish technology standards and frameworks. Results are reported publicly to stakeholders. The chart presents ongoing challenges to accelerate technology use for 21st century skills as technology and workforce needs change rapidly.
Texas Campus S Ta R Chart
The document discusses the Texas STaR Chart, which measures schools' use of technology to support student learning. It describes the four key areas assessed by the STaR Chart: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and infrastructure. Schools are rated at one of four levels - Early Tech, Developing Tech, Advanced Tech, or Target Tech - based on their use of technology in these areas. The document then provides Cullen Middle School's own STaR Chart summary and ratings over recent years, concluding with suggestions for how the school can improve its rating on the chart.
Star ChartPresentation
This document provides an overview of the Star Chart Program used by Faith Family Academy of Oak Cliff to analyze technology integration. The Star Chart is designed to measure progress in four key areas based on Texas' Long-Range Technology Plan and No Child Left Behind requirements. The data shows that Faith Family Academy has achieved advanced levels in infrastructure but has been developing in other areas like teaching and learning, with some marginal trends upward. The Star Chart can help teachers determine professional development needs and provide data to support funding and resource priorities.
What's hot (16)
Jennifer Myers Edld 5352 Campus S Ta R Chart Power Point Presentation ...
Jennifer Myers Edld 5352 Campus S Ta R Chart Power Point Presentation ...
Viewers also liked
Indicators of instructional leadership
The document outlines indicators of instructional leadership in a school including that the school's mission and vision are clearly stated, the curriculum is aligned with goals, and a monitoring plan is established and implemented to regularly observe teachers and address development needs while making data-based decisions and promoting student achievement, learning, and partnerships with parents.
Instructional leadership domains
The document discusses the roles and responsibilities of school heads as instructional leaders. It begins by defining leadership and then outlines 7 points related to school heads' expectations, core functions, developing leadership skills, roles in achieving instructional goals, personal leadership styles, and domains of responsibility. It further discusses instructional leadership, grouping teacher expectations, and indicators of active instructional leadership. School heads are responsible for strategic leadership, instructional leadership, managerial resources, human resources, cultural leadership, micropolitical leadership, and external development leadership. Their main responsibilities include school management, school communications, school community relations, and instructional supervision.
Instructional Leadership: Creating the Conditions #leadership20
Presentation given on October 30, 2012 as part of the #Leadership20 learning series MOOC. Inquires about and describes successful strategies and ideas to create instructional leadership in schools.
The Instructional leader: TOwards School Improvement
This slide contains (1) Purpose of instructional leadership, (2) What is instructional leadership? (3) Curriculum involvement
Functions of an instructional leader, (4) Roles of the instructional leader (5) Characteristics of instructional leadership, (5) Activities of instructional leadership, (6) Effective instructional leaders, (7) Instructionally effective schools, and (8)
Philippine Professional Standards for Teaching.
Becoming an Exemplary Instructional Leader
The document discusses instructional leadership and the role of the principal. It outlines several key concepts of instructional leadership including being principal-centered, having a high focus on curriculum and instruction, setting clear goals, allocating resources, and monitoring teaching and learning. It also discusses qualities of instructional leaders including knowledge, confidence, and enthusiasm. The principal must be an expert in teaching and learning, provide resources and support to teachers, and act as an instructional resource through open communication and visible classroom presence.
Instructional Leadership
An overview Instructional Leadership, Educator Effectiveness and the Teacher-Principal Partnership.
Discover best practices and staff development tools with this in-depth brief on SB-191 implementation
Highlights
• The importance of Instructional Leadership
• Understanding the rubric
• Making the shift
• The teacher-principal partnership
• Developing teacher leaders
• Fostering talent
• Peer practices
Instructional leadership
Instructional leadership focuses on improving teaching and learning, while administrative leadership deals more with managerial tasks. Principals wear many hats and must balance these roles. However, principals often spend little time on instructional leadership due to other duties and a lack of training in this area. Good instructional leadership involves setting goals, monitoring lessons, allocating resources to support instruction, and understanding the classroom perspective. It transforms a school by articulating a vision, being supportive and empowering, and promoting change to benefit students. The characteristics of good instructional leadership include knowledge of change management, confidence, communication skills, and enthusiasm for bringing stakeholders together to improve outcomes.
Instructional leadership 05.26.12
Instructional leadership encompasses actions that principals take to promote student learning growth. It includes defining the school's purpose, setting goals, providing resources for learning, supervising teachers, coordinating staff development, and creating collaborative relationships among teachers. Research shows that instructional leadership has significant positive effects on student achievement. Principals play a key role as instructional leaders by setting the school vision, acting as an instructional resource, and ensuring a supportive environment for teaching and learning.
DepEd National Competency-Based Standards for School Heads
DepEd National Competency-Based Standards for School HeadsNational Educators Academy of the Philippines
DepEd National Competency-Based Standards for School Heads
Uploaded by the National Educators Academy of the PhilippinesEffective School leadership
This document discusses school leadership in the context of a School-Based Management (SBM) environment. It outlines 10 principles of effective school leadership, including setting accountable goals, ensuring jobs are understood and accomplished, and developing teamwork. The roles and functions of school heads as educational leaders are also described, such as setting the vision and curriculum, and creating an environment conducive to teaching and learning. Different levels of school leadership maturity are identified from standard to progressive to mature. The challenges of collective responsibility and utilizing skills in communication, collaboration, and community building are also highlighted.
Viewers also liked (10)
Instructional Leadership: Creating the Conditions #leadership20
Instructional Leadership: Creating the Conditions #leadership20
The Instructional leader: TOwards School Improvement
The Instructional leader: TOwards School Improvement
DepEd National Competency-Based Standards for School Heads
DepEd National Competency-Based Standards for School Heads
Similar to Texas STaR Chart In-Service
Texas s ta r chart
The document discusses the Texas STaR Chart, which assesses four key areas of technology readiness. At RRHS, three areas were rated as "advanced" in 2010-11, while "educator preparation and development" was "developing". To improve, 25% of the technology budget will fund professional development, classrooms will receive new devices, and best practices will be shared on a blog. The overall goal is to continue promoting proper technology use while providing more training for teachers on integrating technology into learning.
The texas s ta r chart
The Texas STaR Chart is a self-assessment tool used by campuses and school districts to plan, budget for, and evaluate progress in technology. It addresses four key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure. Campuses assess their level of progress across these areas on a scale of Early Tech to Target Tech. The document provides an example of one campus' STaR Chart data over three years, which showed developing progress across most areas and a focus on improving Teaching and Learning and Infrastructure.
S Ta R Chart Results Power Point
The document discusses the STaR Chart results for LaCoste Elementary over a three year period from 2006-2009. It shows the school's progress in four focus areas: Infrastructure for Technology, Leadership/Administration, Educator Preparation, and Teaching/Learning. While some areas improved, the school maintained a "Developing" rating overall and did not meet its goal of an "Advanced" rating. The document then outlines a technology action plan and professional development strategies to help the school improve its STaR Chart scores and meet its goals.
Texas Sta Rpowerp
The document discusses the Texas STaR Chart, which is a survey that measures technological progress towards goals at the district, campus, and individual level. It focuses on four key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure. The document then provides data from Fonville Middle School over three years, showing improvements in most areas from developing to advanced technological levels.
STaR Chart Results Power Point
The document discusses the LaCoste Elementary School's STaR Chart results over a three year period from 2006-2009. It shows that the school was at the Developing Technology level across all key areas measured. The document outlines trends identified, goals for 2009-2010 to reach Advanced Technology in all areas, and an technology action plan to improve integration of technology into teaching and learning through staff development, equipment upgrades, and evaluation of goals.
STaR Chart Results Power Point
The document discusses the LaCoste Elementary School's STaR Chart results over a three year period from 2006-2009. It shows that the school was at the Developing Technology level across all key areas measured. The document outlines trends identified, goals for 2009-2010 to reach Advanced Technology in all areas, and an action plan to improve technology integration through strategies like staff professional development, updating equipment and software, and evaluating goals through lesson plans and STaR Chart scores.
Texas s ta_r_chart[1]
The document discusses the Texas STaR Chart which measures schools' progress in meeting technology goals. It evaluates schools in four areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation, administration/support, and infrastructure. Last year, Wakeland High School was at the advanced level for teaching/learning, educator preparation, and administration/support, but developing in infrastructure. To hit the target level, the summary recommends the school provide professional development, integrate more technology into curriculums, and improve infrastructure with support from technology facilitators.
Instructional Leadership STaR Chart Presentation Week 2
This document outlines an agenda for a professional development meeting on the STaR Chart for Cater Elementary. The STaR Chart is a tool that measures a school's educational technology profile and can be used to create technology plans, set goals, and track progress over time. The summary shows Cater Elementary's STaR Chart data from 2006-2007 to 2008-2009, which indicates their profile improved from Developing Tech to Advanced Tech in all areas over that period. Key areas discussed were how to improve educator preparation and development further and keep enhancing technology integration in teaching and learning.
Long Range Plan 2
The document discusses Texas' Long Range Plan for Technology from 2006-2020. It outlines the plan's goals for teaching/learning, educator preparation, leadership/support, and infrastructure. Schools measure progress in these areas using the Texas School Technology and Readiness Chart, which evaluates 6 key areas in each category. The summary provides an example analysis showing Denison High School's ratings over three years for each category. It concludes by questioning how Texas schools will achieve the plan's target technology level by 2020.
Long Range Plan
Basic overview of the Texas Long Range Plan for Technology through 2020 including statistics for Denison High School in Denison, Texas.
Texas Star
The document discusses the Texas STaR Chart, which measures a school's technological progress in key areas. It provides data from Fonville Middle School, which has advanced in many areas from 2006-2007 to 2008-2009. The school has progressed from a "Developing" to an "Advanced" classification according to the STaR Chart. Official information about the Texas STaR Chart can be found at http://starchart.esc12.net/.
Instructional Development STaR Chart Week 2 Staff Development
The document summarizes a professional development meeting about the STaR Chart, a tool used to assess schools' educational technology. It provides an agenda and background on the STaR Chart. Data is presented from Cater Elementary's STaR Chart assessments from 2006-2009, showing they improved all areas from "Developing Tech" to "Advanced Tech". The document concludes by discussing keeping standards high and improving educator development.
Star chart presentation
The Texas STaR Chart is used to evaluate progress towards technology goals in four key areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation and development, leadership and support, and infrastructure. Nichols Intermediate's results from 2006-2009 show developing levels for most areas, though infrastructure was advanced. Plans include more technology professional development, sharing resources with staff, and informing staff of progress through meetings. The conclusion notes growth in most areas and a need to self-assess support for 21st century teaching and learning.
Texas Sta Rpowerp
The document discusses the Texas STaR Chart, which is a survey that measures technological progress towards goals at schools. It focuses on data from Fonville Middle School in four key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure. The data shows that Fonville Middle School has improved in most areas from developing to advanced technological levels over the past three years.
Texas powerpoint
The STaR Chart is a tool developed around four key areas of Texas's Long-Range Plan for Technology to assist in improving student learning through technology use. It contains statewide summaries by areas including teaching and learning, educator preparation, administration and support, and infrastructure. For one campus in 2009-2010, classifications in teaching and learning and educator preparation were "Developing Tech", leadership and support was "Early Tech", and infrastructure was "Developing Technology". The STaR Chart is meant to guide teachers and districts in preparing students for the future by determining progress and identifying areas for improvement.
Texas Star Chart
The document summarizes the Texas Star Chart assessment of technology readiness for Scarborough High School over three years from 2006-2009. The Star Chart evaluates schools across four key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation, Leadership & Support, and Infrastructure. It shows that Scarborough High School demonstrated advancing levels in Infrastructure but developing levels in Educator Preparation, indicating limited technology-focused professional development for teachers. The recommendation is to focus on improving Educator Preparation through increased teacher training, mentoring, and collaboration to better integrate technology with learning and teaching.
Texas Star chart
The document summarizes the Texas Star Chart assessment of technology readiness for Scarborough High School over three years from 2006-2009. The Star Chart evaluates schools across four key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation, Leadership & Support, and Infrastructure. It shows that Scarborough High School demonstrated advancing levels in Infrastructure but developing levels in Educator Preparation, indicating limited technology-focused professional development for teachers. The recommendation is to focus on improving Educator Preparation through increased teacher training, mentoring, and collaboration to better integrate technology with learning and teaching.
Texas Star Chart
The document summarizes the Texas Star Chart assessment of technology readiness for Scarborough High School over three years from 2006-2009. The Star Chart evaluates schools across four key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation, Leadership & Support, and Infrastructure. It shows that Scarborough High School demonstrated advancing levels in Infrastructure but developing levels in Educator Preparation, indicating limited technological professional development for teachers. The recommendation is to focus on improving Educator Preparation through increased teacher training, mentoring, and collaboration to better integrate technology with learning and teaching.
Texas Star Chart
The document summarizes the Texas Star Chart assessment of technology readiness for Scarborough High School over three years from 2006-2009. The Star Chart evaluates schools across four key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation, Leadership & Support, and Infrastructure. It shows that Scarborough High School demonstrated advancing levels in Infrastructure but developing levels in Educator Preparation, indicating limited technology-focused professional development for teachers. The recommendation is to focus on improving Educator Preparation through increased teacher training, mentoring, and collaboration to better integrate technology with learning and teaching.
Edle 5352 powerpoint star chart revised
The document outlines an agenda for a meeting to discuss the STaR (School Technology and Readiness) chart. The STaR chart is used by schools in Texas to assess their progress in implementing technology based on the state's long-range technology plan. The agenda includes presentations on what the STaR chart is, reviewing the school's long-range technology plan, examining the school's STaR results over the past three years, discussing recommendations, and a question/answer session.
Similar to Texas STaR Chart In-Service (20)
Instructional Leadership STaR Chart Presentation Week 2
Instructional Leadership STaR Chart Presentation Week 2
Instructional Development STaR Chart Week 2 Staff Development
Instructional Development STaR Chart Week 2 Staff Development
Recently uploaded
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
The History of Stoke Newington Street Names
Presented at the Stoke Newington Literary Festival on 9th June 2024
www.StokeNewingtonHistory.com
The Diamonds of 2023-2024 in the IGRA collection
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
Odoo 17 CRM allows us to track why we lose sales opportunities with "Lost Reasons." This helps analyze our sales process and identify areas for improvement. Here's how to configure lost reasons in Odoo 17 CRM
Assessment and Planning in Educational technology.pptx
In an education system, it is understood that assessment is only for the students, but on the other hand, the Assessment of teachers is also an important aspect of the education system that ensures teachers are providing high-quality instruction to students. The assessment process can be used to provide feedback and support for professional development, to inform decisions about teacher retention or promotion, or to evaluate teacher effectiveness for accountability purposes.
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docx
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
ANATOMY AND BIOMECHANICS OF HIP JOINT.pdf
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptxMohd Adib Abd Muin, Senior Lecturer at Universiti Utara Malaysia
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Recently uploaded (20)
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
Assessment and Planning in Educational technology.pptx
Assessment and Planning in Educational technology.pptx
Digital Artefact 1 - Tiny Home Environmental Design
Digital Artefact 1 - Tiny Home Environmental Design
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Texas STaR Chart In-Service
- 1. Texas STaRTexas STaR ChartChart Presented by Rick Nagir
- 2. Brookline ElementaryBrookline Elementary Bobcat Proud!Bobcat Proud!
- 3. AgendaAgenda Introduction to Texas STaR ChartIntroduction to Texas STaR Chart Overview of CategoriesOverview of Categories Findings – Data AnalysisFindings – Data Analysis Summary RecommendationsSummary Recommendations ConclusionConclusion
- 4. The Texas STaR Chart is a teacher toolThe Texas STaR Chart is a teacher tool for planning and self-assessingfor planning and self-assessing competence in technology usage alignedcompetence in technology usage aligned with thewith the Long-Range Plan for Long-Range Plan for Technology, 2006-2020.Technology, 2006-2020.
- 5. The Texas Teacher STaR Chart has been developed around the four key areas of the Long- Range Plan for Technology, 2006-2020: Teaching and Learning Educator Preparation and Development Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support Infrastructure for Technology
- 6. The Texas Teacher STaR Chart May BeThe Texas Teacher STaR Chart May Be Used to:Used to: Assist teachers in determining professional development needsAssist teachers in determining professional development needs based on a current educational technology profile.based on a current educational technology profile. Provide data that feeds into the Texas Campus STaR Chart soProvide data that feeds into the Texas Campus STaR Chart so that more accurate school information is gained and documented.that more accurate school information is gained and documented. Determine funding priorities based on teacher and classroomDetermine funding priorities based on teacher and classroom needsneeds Provide data that can support the need for grants or otherProvide data that can support the need for grants or other resources.resources. Help conceptualize the campus or district vision of technology.Help conceptualize the campus or district vision of technology.
- 7. Classification RangesClassification Ranges Early Tech = 6-8Early Tech = 6-8 Developing Tech = 9-14Developing Tech = 9-14 Advanced Tech = 15-20Advanced Tech = 15-20 Target Tech = 21-24Target Tech = 21-24
- 9. Findings – Data Analysis (10-11)Findings – Data Analysis (10-11) In the area of Teaching and Learning (TL) we were at Advanced Tech, anIn the area of Teaching and Learning (TL) we were at Advanced Tech, an increase from 09-10. We had three areas of concern: TL1, TL4 and TL6.increase from 09-10. We had three areas of concern: TL1, TL4 and TL6. In the area of Educator Preparation and Development (EP) we were atIn the area of Educator Preparation and Development (EP) we were at Advanced Tech, a significant increase from 09-10. We had three areas ofAdvanced Tech, a significant increase from 09-10. We had three areas of concern: EP2, EP3 and EP4.concern: EP2, EP3 and EP4. In the area of Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support (L) weIn the area of Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support (L) we were at Advanced Tech, a significant increase from 09-10. In all subwere at Advanced Tech, a significant increase from 09-10. In all sub categories we were ranked at Advanced Tech.categories we were ranked at Advanced Tech. In the area of Infrastructure for Technology (INF) we were at AdvancedIn the area of Infrastructure for Technology (INF) we were at Advanced Tech, an increase from 09-10. We had two areas of concern: INF1 andTech, an increase from 09-10. We had two areas of concern: INF1 and INF3.INF3.
- 10. Summary RecommendationsSummary Recommendations Increased awareness of technology TEKSIncreased awareness of technology TEKS and standards.and standards. Technology integration across the contentTechnology integration across the content areas.areas. Increased allocation of resources toIncreased allocation of resources to address technology integration.address technology integration. Dedicated campus personnel to addressDedicated campus personnel to address best instructional practices for integratingbest instructional practices for integrating technology usage.technology usage.
- 11. Web ResourcesWeb Resources http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index2.aspx?id=2147500114&menu_id=2147483665&menu_id2=788http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index2.aspx?id=2147500114&menu_id=2147483665&menu_id2=788 http://starchart.epsilen.com/http://starchart.epsilen.com/ http://ricknagir.blogspot.com/p/educator-preparation-and-development.htmlhttp://ricknagir.blogspot.com/p/educator-preparation-and-development.html
- 12. ClosingClosing ““If we teach today as we taught yesterday,If we teach today as we taught yesterday, we rob our children of tomorrow”we rob our children of tomorrow” John DeweyJohn Dewey