Similar to Talis Insight Europe 2017 - Marketing and launching the reading lists service to academics & students - Royal Holloway, University of London
Getting into teaching (Skills academy) 2016Elise Sherman
Similar to Talis Insight Europe 2017 - Marketing and launching the reading lists service to academics & students - Royal Holloway, University of London (20)
19. Reading List Challenge
Come take part in our quick-fire Reading List Challenge!
3 questions. One Reading List. Fastest wins.
Just for taking part you’ll earn some sweets.
Navigate your way through the system as quick as you can – the
fastest time wins a £50 Amazon Voucher.
Plus compete for pride against the times set by, your friends, rival
departments and even the Principal!
25. Aims for 2017/18
All lists published by start of Spring term 2018
High Use collection
Increase number of academic owned lists
Increase student engagement
Encourage Academics to use this as a teaching tool
Editor's Notes
2015/16 -
Spring 2016 - Helen worked with two Associate Deans on the texts of emails to ensure they would appeal to Academic staff.
May 18th - Simon Higman sent out after the main exam period. Three weeks before the exam boards.
Follow up June 13th - after exam boards but many academics around that week.
140 lists received by 30th June 2016.
Along with the email from Simon Higman, the Information Consultants (ICs) have been undertaking a major push to get the lists. This has seen 739 lists received by the reading list team; of these 703 were directly from academic staff, 46 of which are now academically owned (either input by and academic or updated by an academic after it was created by the Reading List team). The others were pulled from Moodle.
Talk about reading list assistants and growth of the team
February 2016 - 395 lists in system
1059 published lists 2016/17 out of approximately 1200
Only 6% are owned by academics - aim for 2017/18
When i took over Psycholoy i was told that the reason we didnt have any psychology reading lists is because the department had their own intranet that they would not give us access to it
Over 25% of Psychology lists are now owned and updated by academics