Tacoma Narrows Suspension Bridge was a bridge constructed in Washington D.C. in 1940. The structure was a complete loss just after four months of its construction.
PRESENTED BY: Muhammad Asad Hayat, Student Department of Civil Engineering, Session (2014-18)
COURSE: Civil Engineering Practice
COURSE INSTRUCTOR: Engr. Arslan Yaqub, Lecturer, Civil Engineering
UNIVERSITY: University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila
Some general information about golden gate bridge, San Francisco, America. Longest suspension bridge of his time and most visited bridge till now and marvel of CONSTRUCTION. Many movies also include this bridge because of because of its beauty. What a achievement!!!!
This is a Slideshow I made to explain the Empire State Building. This is also my P3. P3 means personal passoin project and the 3 shows that we do 3 passion projects each year.
This presentation covers salient features of the stabilisation of the leaning tower of pisa. Presentation is basically based on the account of soil mechanics and other civil engineering techniques.
Detailed outlineResearch question What happened to th.docxsimonithomas47935
Detailed outline
Research question:
What happened to the Tacoma Narrows Bridge and what steps can engineer take to avoid this situation from happening again?
Thesis statement:
There are important lessons that engineers can learn from studying the design and the collapse of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge so they can avoid this from happening again in the future.
I. Introduction
II. Design
A. As the Tacoma Narrows Bridge was being designed, engineers were not expecting wind that hits at 42 miles per hour.
B. The Tacoma Narrows Bridge was too weak to hold because the bridge was too light, too shallow and too long.
III. Cause of collapse
How could a modern bridge with advanced design suffer failure from wind?
A. the main reason of the failure of Tacoma Narrows bridge was it’s great flexibility, while the bridge was moving it acted like aerofoil, creating drag and lift.
B. aerodynamic were a bit understood, engineers were supposed to test bring modals and suspension.
IV. For avoiding future problems
A. Engineers must utilise computer simulations that makes them better understand design and pressure of wind flow.
B.
Detailed outline
Research question:
What happened to the Tacoma Narrows Bridge and what steps can engineer take to avoid this situation from happening again?
Thesis statement:
There are important lessons that engineers can learn from studying the design and the collapse of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge so they can avoid this from happening again in the future.
I. Introduction
II. Design
A. As the Tacoma Narrows Bridge was being designed, engineers were not expecting wind that hits at 42 miles per hour.
B. The Tacoma Narrows Bridge was too weak to hold because the bridge was too light, too shallow and too long.
III. Cause of collapse
How could a modern bridge with advanced design suffer failure from wind?
A. the main reason of the failure of Tacoma Narrows bridge was it’s great flexibility, while the bridge was moving it acted like aerofoil, creating drag and lift.
B. aerodynamic were a bit understood, engineers were supposed to test bring modals and suspension.
IV. For avoiding future problems
A. Engineers must utilise computer simulations that makes them better understand design and pressure of wind flow.
B.
The Tacoma Narrows Collapse
March, 2017
Imagine yourself driving through the third longest bridge with your beloved Golden Retriever on a hot sunny day. However, you suddenly feel the bridge kneeling towards the right and left. Seeing everyone in front of you vacating their cars and running away from the bridge before it collapses. Most likely, you would do the same even maybe 3 times faster before it’s too late. But sadly, when it’s too late and the bridge has collapsed you will eventually realize that you have left your beloved dog behind. The First Tacoma Narrows Bridge was being completed and designed in the state of Washington, Tacoma. The Tacoma Narrows bridge was constructed .
Case Study 7.3 249 CASE STUDY 7.3 Classic Case Tacoma Narrows Suspen.pdfSANDEEPARIHANT
Case Study 7.3 249 CASE STUDY 7.3 Classic Case: Tacoma Narrows Suspension Bridge The
dramatic collapse of the Tacoma Narrows suspen- a series of violent vertical and torsional
oscillations. sion bridge in 1940, barely four months after comple- Alarmingly, the amplitudes
steadily increased, suspen tion, was a severe blow to the design and construction sions came
loose, the support structures buckled, and of large span bridges. It serves as a landmark failure in
the span began to break up. In effect, the bridge seemed engineering history and is, indeed, a
featured lesson in to have come alive, struggling like a bound animal, most civil engineering
programs. The story of the col- and was literally shaking itself apart. Motorists caught lapse
serves as a fascinating account of one important on the bridge had to abandon their cars and
crawl off aspect of project failure: engineering\'s misunderstand- the bridge, as the side-to-side
roll had become so pro- ing of the effect that a variety of natural forces can have nounced (by
now, the roll had reached 45 degrees in on projects, particularly in the construction industry.
either direction, causing the sides of the bridge to rise Opening in July 1941, the Tacoma
Narrows and fall more than 30 feet) that it was impossible to tra Bridge was built at a cost of
$6.4 million and was verse the bridge on foot largely funded by the federal government\'s Public
After a fairly short period of time in which the was wave oscillations became incredibly violent,
the sus- ks Administration. The purpose of the bridge essentially viewed as a defense measure to
connect pension bridge simply could not resist the pounding Seattle and Tacoma with the Puget
Sound Navy Yard and broke apart. Observers stood in shock on either at Bremerton. As the
third-largest single suspension side of the bridge and watched as first large pieces of bridge in the
world, it had a center span of 2,800 feet the roadway and then entire lengths of the span rained
and 1,000-foot approaches at each er down into the Tacoma Narrows below. Fortunately, no
human lives were lost, since traffic had been closed in Even before its inauguration and op ening,
the bridge began exhibiting strange characteristics that the nick of time were immediately
noticeable. For example, the slightest wind could cause the bridge to develop a pronounced
supported by massive 130-meter-high steel towers longitudinal roll. The bridge would quite
literally begin comprised of 335-foot-long spans. These spans man to lift at one end and, in a
wave action, the lift would aged to remain intact despite the collapse of the main \"roll\" the
length of the bridge. Depending upon the span. The second bridge (TNB II) would end up mak
severity of the wind, cameras were able to detect any ing use of these spans when it was rebuilt
shortly there- where up to eight separate vertical nodes in its rolling after, by a new span
stiffened with a web truss ction. Many motorists crossing the bridge .
Some general information about golden gate bridge, San Francisco, America. Longest suspension bridge of his time and most visited bridge till now and marvel of CONSTRUCTION. Many movies also include this bridge because of because of its beauty. What a achievement!!!!
This is a Slideshow I made to explain the Empire State Building. This is also my P3. P3 means personal passoin project and the 3 shows that we do 3 passion projects each year.
This presentation covers salient features of the stabilisation of the leaning tower of pisa. Presentation is basically based on the account of soil mechanics and other civil engineering techniques.
Detailed outlineResearch question What happened to th.docxsimonithomas47935
Detailed outline
Research question:
What happened to the Tacoma Narrows Bridge and what steps can engineer take to avoid this situation from happening again?
Thesis statement:
There are important lessons that engineers can learn from studying the design and the collapse of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge so they can avoid this from happening again in the future.
I. Introduction
II. Design
A. As the Tacoma Narrows Bridge was being designed, engineers were not expecting wind that hits at 42 miles per hour.
B. The Tacoma Narrows Bridge was too weak to hold because the bridge was too light, too shallow and too long.
III. Cause of collapse
How could a modern bridge with advanced design suffer failure from wind?
A. the main reason of the failure of Tacoma Narrows bridge was it’s great flexibility, while the bridge was moving it acted like aerofoil, creating drag and lift.
B. aerodynamic were a bit understood, engineers were supposed to test bring modals and suspension.
IV. For avoiding future problems
A. Engineers must utilise computer simulations that makes them better understand design and pressure of wind flow.
B.
Detailed outline
Research question:
What happened to the Tacoma Narrows Bridge and what steps can engineer take to avoid this situation from happening again?
Thesis statement:
There are important lessons that engineers can learn from studying the design and the collapse of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge so they can avoid this from happening again in the future.
I. Introduction
II. Design
A. As the Tacoma Narrows Bridge was being designed, engineers were not expecting wind that hits at 42 miles per hour.
B. The Tacoma Narrows Bridge was too weak to hold because the bridge was too light, too shallow and too long.
III. Cause of collapse
How could a modern bridge with advanced design suffer failure from wind?
A. the main reason of the failure of Tacoma Narrows bridge was it’s great flexibility, while the bridge was moving it acted like aerofoil, creating drag and lift.
B. aerodynamic were a bit understood, engineers were supposed to test bring modals and suspension.
IV. For avoiding future problems
A. Engineers must utilise computer simulations that makes them better understand design and pressure of wind flow.
B.
The Tacoma Narrows Collapse
March, 2017
Imagine yourself driving through the third longest bridge with your beloved Golden Retriever on a hot sunny day. However, you suddenly feel the bridge kneeling towards the right and left. Seeing everyone in front of you vacating their cars and running away from the bridge before it collapses. Most likely, you would do the same even maybe 3 times faster before it’s too late. But sadly, when it’s too late and the bridge has collapsed you will eventually realize that you have left your beloved dog behind. The First Tacoma Narrows Bridge was being completed and designed in the state of Washington, Tacoma. The Tacoma Narrows bridge was constructed .
Case Study 7.3 249 CASE STUDY 7.3 Classic Case Tacoma Narrows Suspen.pdfSANDEEPARIHANT
Case Study 7.3 249 CASE STUDY 7.3 Classic Case: Tacoma Narrows Suspension Bridge The
dramatic collapse of the Tacoma Narrows suspen- a series of violent vertical and torsional
oscillations. sion bridge in 1940, barely four months after comple- Alarmingly, the amplitudes
steadily increased, suspen tion, was a severe blow to the design and construction sions came
loose, the support structures buckled, and of large span bridges. It serves as a landmark failure in
the span began to break up. In effect, the bridge seemed engineering history and is, indeed, a
featured lesson in to have come alive, struggling like a bound animal, most civil engineering
programs. The story of the col- and was literally shaking itself apart. Motorists caught lapse
serves as a fascinating account of one important on the bridge had to abandon their cars and
crawl off aspect of project failure: engineering\'s misunderstand- the bridge, as the side-to-side
roll had become so pro- ing of the effect that a variety of natural forces can have nounced (by
now, the roll had reached 45 degrees in on projects, particularly in the construction industry.
either direction, causing the sides of the bridge to rise Opening in July 1941, the Tacoma
Narrows and fall more than 30 feet) that it was impossible to tra Bridge was built at a cost of
$6.4 million and was verse the bridge on foot largely funded by the federal government\'s Public
After a fairly short period of time in which the was wave oscillations became incredibly violent,
the sus- ks Administration. The purpose of the bridge essentially viewed as a defense measure to
connect pension bridge simply could not resist the pounding Seattle and Tacoma with the Puget
Sound Navy Yard and broke apart. Observers stood in shock on either at Bremerton. As the
third-largest single suspension side of the bridge and watched as first large pieces of bridge in the
world, it had a center span of 2,800 feet the roadway and then entire lengths of the span rained
and 1,000-foot approaches at each er down into the Tacoma Narrows below. Fortunately, no
human lives were lost, since traffic had been closed in Even before its inauguration and op ening,
the bridge began exhibiting strange characteristics that the nick of time were immediately
noticeable. For example, the slightest wind could cause the bridge to develop a pronounced
supported by massive 130-meter-high steel towers longitudinal roll. The bridge would quite
literally begin comprised of 335-foot-long spans. These spans man to lift at one end and, in a
wave action, the lift would aged to remain intact despite the collapse of the main \"roll\" the
length of the bridge. Depending upon the span. The second bridge (TNB II) would end up mak
severity of the wind, cameras were able to detect any ing use of these spans when it was rebuilt
shortly there- where up to eight separate vertical nodes in its rolling after, by a new span
stiffened with a web truss ction. Many motorists crossing the bridge .
Harnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming PipelinesChristina Lin
Traditionally, dealing with real-time data pipelines has involved significant overhead, even for straightforward tasks like data transformation or masking. However, in this talk, we’ll venture into the dynamic realm of WebAssembly (WASM) and discover how it can revolutionize the creation of stateless streaming pipelines within a Kafka (Redpanda) broker. These pipelines are adept at managing low-latency, high-data-volume scenarios.
We have compiled the most important slides from each speaker's presentation. This year’s compilation, available for free, captures the key insights and contributions shared during the DfMAy 2024 conference.
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdffxintegritypublishin
Advancements in technology unveil a myriad of electrical and electronic breakthroughs geared towards efficiently harnessing limited resources to meet human energy demands. The optimization of hybrid solar PV panels and pumped hydro energy supply systems plays a pivotal role in utilizing natural resources effectively. This initiative not only benefits humanity but also fosters environmental sustainability. The study investigated the design optimization of these hybrid systems, focusing on understanding solar radiation patterns, identifying geographical influences on solar radiation, formulating a mathematical model for system optimization, and determining the optimal configuration of PV panels and pumped hydro storage. Through a comparative analysis approach and eight weeks of data collection, the study addressed key research questions related to solar radiation patterns and optimal system design. The findings highlighted regions with heightened solar radiation levels, showcasing substantial potential for power generation and emphasizing the system's efficiency. Optimizing system design significantly boosted power generation, promoted renewable energy utilization, and enhanced energy storage capacity. The study underscored the benefits of optimizing hybrid solar PV panels and pumped hydro energy supply systems for sustainable energy usage. Optimizing the design of solar PV panels and pumped hydro energy supply systems as examined across diverse climatic conditions in a developing country, not only enhances power generation but also improves the integration of renewable energy sources and boosts energy storage capacities, particularly beneficial for less economically prosperous regions. Additionally, the study provides valuable insights for advancing energy research in economically viable areas. Recommendations included conducting site-specific assessments, utilizing advanced modeling tools, implementing regular maintenance protocols, and enhancing communication among system components.
Using recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) for pavements is crucial to achieving sustainability. Implementing RCA for new pavement can minimize carbon footprint, conserve natural resources, reduce harmful emissions, and lower life cycle costs. Compared to natural aggregate (NA), RCA pavement has fewer comprehensive studies and sustainability assessments.
NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER IN CONDENSING HEAT EXCHANGERS...ssuser7dcef0
Power plants release a large amount of water vapor into the
atmosphere through the stack. The flue gas can be a potential
source for obtaining much needed cooling water for a power
plant. If a power plant could recover and reuse a portion of this
moisture, it could reduce its total cooling water intake
requirement. One of the most practical way to recover water
from flue gas is to use a condensing heat exchanger. The power
plant could also recover latent heat due to condensation as well
as sensible heat due to lowering the flue gas exit temperature.
Additionally, harmful acids released from the stack can be
reduced in a condensing heat exchanger by acid condensation. reduced in a condensing heat exchanger by acid condensation.
Condensation of vapors in flue gas is a complicated
phenomenon since heat and mass transfer of water vapor and
various acids simultaneously occur in the presence of noncondensable
gases such as nitrogen and oxygen. Design of a
condenser depends on the knowledge and understanding of the
heat and mass transfer processes. A computer program for
numerical simulations of water (H2O) and sulfuric acid (H2SO4)
condensation in a flue gas condensing heat exchanger was
developed using MATLAB. Governing equations based on
mass and energy balances for the system were derived to
predict variables such as flue gas exit temperature, cooling
water outlet temperature, mole fraction and condensation rates
of water and sulfuric acid vapors. The equations were solved
using an iterative solution technique with calculations of heat
and mass transfer coefficients and physical properties.
Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
Terzaghi's soil bearing capacity theory, developed by Karl Terzaghi, is a fundamental principle in geotechnical engineering used to determine the bearing capacity of shallow foundations. This theory provides a method to calculate the ultimate bearing capacity of soil, which is the maximum load per unit area that the soil can support without undergoing shear failure. The Calculation HTML Code included.
6th International Conference on Machine Learning & Applications (CMLA 2024)ClaraZara1
6th International Conference on Machine Learning & Applications (CMLA 2024) will provide an excellent international forum for sharing knowledge and results in theory, methodology and applications of on Machine Learning & Applications.
Understanding Inductive Bias in Machine LearningSUTEJAS
This presentation explores the concept of inductive bias in machine learning. It explains how algorithms come with built-in assumptions and preferences that guide the learning process. You'll learn about the different types of inductive bias and how they can impact the performance and generalizability of machine learning models.
The presentation also covers the positive and negative aspects of inductive bias, along with strategies for mitigating potential drawbacks. We'll explore examples of how bias manifests in algorithms like neural networks and decision trees.
By understanding inductive bias, you can gain valuable insights into how machine learning models work and make informed decisions when building and deploying them.
2. Introduction
• Tacoma Narrows Suspension Bridge was
constructed in the Washington D.C., a state in
United States, that connected the Tacoma Narrows
strait of Puget Sound (‘Sound’: narrow channel of
the sea joining two larger bodies of water) between
Tacoma and the Kitsap Peninsula.
• This bridge collapsed just four months after its
construction.
• It was world’s 3rd longest suspension bridge in the
world at the time of its failure.
3. Introduction (Contd…)
• Total cost of bridge was 6.4 million U.S.D (105
million USD in 2012).
• Total structure length was 5939 ft with 5000 ft
suspension span and it consisted of three spans,
one central suspension span or deck and two short
suspension spans one each side. Lengths of spans
were as follows:
1. 1st Short Suspension Span (1100 ft)
2. Central Span (2800 ft)
3. 2nd Short Suspension Span (1100 ft)
4. Introduction (Contd…)
• Center span (Height above water) = 195 ft
• Width of roadway = 26 ft
• Width of sidewalk (On each side) = 5 ft
• Height of East Pier = 247 ft
• Height of West Pier = 198 ft
• Height, Towers above piers = 425 ft
6. Main Cable Deck
Anchorage
Main Towers
1st Short Span 2nd Short Span
Center Span
Bridge at the time of its inauguration ceremony, 1940
E
W N
S
7. Need of Bridge
• This bridge, constructed in two years, was designed
to join Tacoma and less-developed Kitsap Peninsula
which could result in increase in development and
population in both areas.
• Bridge also benefited the US Military (Air Force and
Navy) connecting their air fields and ship yards.
• A road could be constructed to connect these two
places, but it cost more money than to construct a
bridge.
• Bridge was designed to hold 60,000 cars.
8. Historical Background and Funding
• Need of a bridge to connect two cities dates back to
1889 but concreted efforts began in 1920s.
• Initial design of bridge was given by Clark Eldridge
in 1938 who was Washington State Engineer.
• Leon Moisseiff, New York bridge engineer who
served as designer and consultant engineer for the
Golden Gate Bridge - petitioned the PWA (Public
Works Administration) and the RFC (Reconstruction
Finance Corporation) to build the bridge for less.
Moisseiff proposed shallower support which cost
less. Moisseiff’s design won out.
9. Historical Background and Funding
(Contd…)
Initial design of bridge by Eldridge, 23 May 1938
Safe Design ?
Eldridge proposed truss deck for the bridge so that wind could easily pass through it.
11. Movements during Construction
• A small movement in deck of bridge was noted
many times by workers even during the construction
of the bridge when wind blew. A small vibration
could be expected in a bridge but vibrations
produced in this bridge were not normal.
• Engineers were aware that bridge was prone to
motion.
• Retrofitting to design, as bridge construction
progressed, by new ideas from engineers was also
done.
12. Prevention of Movements
• Retrofitting of bridge, to avoid the movements and
stiffen the bridge, as mentioned earlier was done by
installing hydraulic jacks and tie down cables.
Tie-down cables
13. Failure
• Analytical studies have shown that this bridge failed
due to winds running at 64 km/h velocity in the
Eastern direction on 7th of November, 1940.
• In fact,
“Tacoma Narrows was made with wind-resisting
plate girders rather than deep stiffening trusses.”
• In design of bridge, aerodynamic forces were not
taken into account due to which winds running at
64km/h speed in one direction caused it to fail.
15. Failure (Contd…)
• Bridge was too skinny, fragile and flexible. It had
only two lanes, less mass.
• The wind exerted a lot of pressure, assisted by more
and more severe aerodynamic forces, and made
waves which caused the bridge to twist and collapse
in water.
• During the collapse, the main suspension cables
were thrown violently side to side, twisted, and
tossed many feet into the air.
• On the north cable at midspan, where the support
cable had loosened, it broke more than 350 wires.
16. Failure (Contd…)
• Other wires were severely distorted. The main
cables were a total loss. Their only value was as
scrap metal.
Ultimate Collapse
Courtesy: Wikipedia
18. Torsional (Twisting) Movements at
the time of failure
The nature and severity of
the torsional movement is
revealed in this image
taken from the Tacoma end
of the suspension span.
When the twisting motion
was at the maximum,
elevation of the footpath at
the right was 28 feet (9m)
higher than the footpath at
left side of the bridge.
20. Damages to Side Spans
• Side spans, which became unbalanced, were too
severely damaged.
• Sag of approximately 45 feet appeared in both side
spans.
21. What does Physics say about
failure?
• Vertical Oscillations or Torsional Movements, as
mentioned earlier, were noted during construction of
bridge.
• Aerodynamic flutter is regarded as major cause of
failure.
• Resonance effect and vortex shedding also caused
it to fail.
22. Aerodynamic Flutter in Bridge
• Tendency to aerodynamic flutter is present in all
flexible structures i.e. bridges, jet planes,
aeroplanes.
• It is possible only if structural and aerodynamic
forces are running at same frequency.
• Majority of researchers consider aerodynamic
flutter to be the main reason for the failure of
bridge.
23. Understanding Aerodynamic Flutter
• If a father is pushing his kid on swing then swing
would have a natural frequency. If swing would
come back to him after every 4 seconds, then to
maintain the motion of swing, father must push the
swing each time (after every 4 seconds) known as
external force applied with periodic frequency. If he
is not able to do so, he will damp the motion.
• If external periodic frequency matches natural
frequency, we get a resonance frequency. If this
phenomenon remains for some time, it will,
ultimately, cause amplitude to increase due to
proper timing of force i.e. failure of plane wings,
failure of deck of bridge.
25. Resonance
• We know that resonance happens when:
“Any system is vibrated at its natural frequency or
resonant frequency.”
• Take example of a rope.
You can think of resonance
as having the natural
frequency of the system
exactly in tune with your
force.
26. Resonance effect on the bridges
• In design of bridge, resonance phenomenon plays
an important role.
• This is susceptibility or tendency of any structure to
respond at an increased amplitude when frequency
of its oscillations meets its natural frequency.
• If it happens, severe vibrations are produced in the
structure causing ultimate failure.
• Many factors are involved in vibrations of bridge i.e.
vibrations due to traffic flow, heavy machinery, wind.
• One such affect was noted in Tacoma Narrows
Bridge e.g. wind.
27. Resonance effect on the bridges
(Contd…)
• If natural frequency of structure is achieved due to
any factor, it will cause more vibrations and more
storage of energy in the system. When this energy
exceeds an object’s load limits, structure will lose its
integrity.
• In case of Tacoma Narrows, when natural frequency
met frequency of wind blowing, it caused
denominator to be very small and therefore caused
increase in amplitude.
windnatural
wind
nsoscillatio
ff
F
A
Nearly or
completely equal
to zero?
28. Vortex Shedding
• It happens when winds hits a structure, then
vortices of fluid (air) are formed at certain
frequency. When a vortex is formed on one side
of body (Say A), it immediately increases
pressure on side A causing decrease in velocity
in side A and ultimately causing less pressure on
other side (Say B) and more velocity.
• Due to these vortices, a fluctuating force on the
body is induced which causes vibrations in the
structure. If vibrations coincide with the natural
frequency or resonance frequency of structure,
they lead to failure.
29. Vortex Shedding (Contd…)
Imagine wind blowing from
left on the cable cross-
section.
• Small vortex of low pressure
• Move towards low pressure
30. Summary of Physics Analysis
Summarizing the whole analysis:
“A small vibration produced, assisted by the more
and more wind caused the natural frequency of
bridge to meet wind frequency which ultimately
resulted in an increase in the bridge oscillations.
Bridge oscillations increased with time and it
ultimately failed.
Vortex shedding, resonance phenomenon and
aerodynamic flutter were interlinked to each other in
sense of natural frequency of the structure”.
31. Bridge (1950)
• Soon after failure of bridge, it was expected to be
rebuilt with 1-1.5 years.
• Due to WW-II, its construction delayed.
• In 1950, new bridge was completed.
• Second bridge had truss-girders which allowed to
wind to pass through bridge easily.
• New bridge, being wide and thicker, had more
torsional stiffness than previous bridge.
• Wind tunnel test were also performed prior to its
construction on small scale model.
33. Bridge (2007)
• Due to high traffic flow, another bridge parallel to
1950 bridge was constructed to carry eastbound
traffic.
Westbound Bridge (1950)
Eastbound Bridge (2007)
Twin Bridges of Tacoma
34. Major difference between the two
(1940 & 1950)
• Following are some of differences between 1940 &
1950 suspension bridges:
1940 Bridge 1950 Bridge
Had two lanes Has four lanes
Less stiff More stiff
Less weight More weight
Use of plate girders Use of trusses
Wind-disturbance No wind-disturbance
2.4m deep plate girders 10m deep stiff trusses
35. A Lesson for New Design
• In modern suspension bridges construction, it is now
made mandatory to test the bridge model on small
scale prior to start its construction.
• Science of aerodynamic flutter in bridges was born
after the failure of Tacoma Narrows 1940.
• Effects of resonance on bridges and other flexible
structures were studied thoroughly.
• Vortex shedding and its affects on the bridge were
also taken into account.
• Wide use of open stiffening trusses to let wind pass
through started.
36. A lesson for New Design (Contd…)
• Increase in the weight of bridge because:
Vertical oscillations resistance ∝ Mass of bridge
• Increase in stiffness by using stiffening trusses and
more depth of deck.