SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Tacoma Narrows Suspension Bridge
Presented by:
Muhammad Asad Hayat, 14-CE-148
Civil Engineering Department, UET Taxila
Introduction
• Tacoma Narrows Suspension Bridge was
constructed in the Washington D.C., a state in
United States, that connected the Tacoma Narrows
strait of Puget Sound (‘Sound’: narrow channel of
the sea joining two larger bodies of water) between
Tacoma and the Kitsap Peninsula.
• This bridge collapsed just four months after its
construction.
• It was world’s 3rd longest suspension bridge in the
world at the time of its failure.
Introduction (Contd…)
• Total cost of bridge was 6.4 million U.S.D (105
million USD in 2012).
• Total structure length was 5939 ft with 5000 ft
suspension span and it consisted of three spans,
one central suspension span or deck and two short
suspension spans one each side. Lengths of spans
were as follows:
1. 1st Short Suspension Span (1100 ft)
2. Central Span (2800 ft)
3. 2nd Short Suspension Span (1100 ft)
Introduction (Contd…)
• Center span (Height above water) = 195 ft
• Width of roadway = 26 ft
• Width of sidewalk (On each side) = 5 ft
• Height of East Pier = 247 ft
• Height of West Pier = 198 ft
• Height, Towers above piers = 425 ft
Bridge Map
Main Cable Deck
Anchorage
Main Towers
1st Short Span 2nd Short Span
Center Span
Bridge at the time of its inauguration ceremony, 1940
E
W N
S
Need of Bridge
• This bridge, constructed in two years, was designed
to join Tacoma and less-developed Kitsap Peninsula
which could result in increase in development and
population in both areas.
• Bridge also benefited the US Military (Air Force and
Navy) connecting their air fields and ship yards.
• A road could be constructed to connect these two
places, but it cost more money than to construct a
bridge.
• Bridge was designed to hold 60,000 cars.
Historical Background and Funding
• Need of a bridge to connect two cities dates back to
1889 but concreted efforts began in 1920s.
• Initial design of bridge was given by Clark Eldridge
in 1938 who was Washington State Engineer.
• Leon Moisseiff, New York bridge engineer who
served as designer and consultant engineer for the
Golden Gate Bridge - petitioned the PWA (Public
Works Administration) and the RFC (Reconstruction
Finance Corporation) to build the bridge for less.
Moisseiff proposed shallower support which cost
less. Moisseiff’s design won out.
Historical Background and Funding
(Contd…)
Initial design of bridge by Eldridge, 23 May 1938
Safe Design ?
Eldridge proposed truss deck for the bridge so that wind could easily pass through it.
BUT
WHY?
FAILED!
Movements during Construction
• A small movement in deck of bridge was noted
many times by workers even during the construction
of the bridge when wind blew. A small vibration
could be expected in a bridge but vibrations
produced in this bridge were not normal.
• Engineers were aware that bridge was prone to
motion.
• Retrofitting to design, as bridge construction
progressed, by new ideas from engineers was also
done.
Prevention of Movements
• Retrofitting of bridge, to avoid the movements and
stiffen the bridge, as mentioned earlier was done by
installing hydraulic jacks and tie down cables.
Tie-down cables
Failure
• Analytical studies have shown that this bridge failed
due to winds running at 64 km/h velocity in the
Eastern direction on 7th of November, 1940.
• In fact,
“Tacoma Narrows was made with wind-resisting
plate girders rather than deep stiffening trusses.”
• In design of bridge, aerodynamic forces were not
taken into account due to which winds running at
64km/h speed in one direction caused it to fail.
Failure (Contd…)
Twisting of deck of
the bridge due to
wind action
Failure (Contd…)
• Bridge was too skinny, fragile and flexible. It had
only two lanes, less mass.
• The wind exerted a lot of pressure, assisted by more
and more severe aerodynamic forces, and made
waves which caused the bridge to twist and collapse
in water.
• During the collapse, the main suspension cables
were thrown violently side to side, twisted, and
tossed many feet into the air.
• On the north cable at midspan, where the support
cable had loosened, it broke more than 350 wires.
Failure (Contd…)
• Other wires were severely distorted. The main
cables were a total loss. Their only value was as
scrap metal.
Ultimate Collapse
Courtesy: Wikipedia
Failure (Contd…)
Bridge after failure (Center span crashed)
Torsional (Twisting) Movements at
the time of failure
The nature and severity of
the torsional movement is
revealed in this image
taken from the Tacoma end
of the suspension span.
When the twisting motion
was at the maximum,
elevation of the footpath at
the right was 28 feet (9m)
higher than the footpath at
left side of the bridge.
Torsional (Twisting) Movements at
the time of failure (Contd…)
Aerodynamic forces causing torsional movements
Damages to Side Spans
• Side spans, which became unbalanced, were too
severely damaged.
• Sag of approximately 45 feet appeared in both side
spans.
What does Physics say about
failure?
• Vertical Oscillations or Torsional Movements, as
mentioned earlier, were noted during construction of
bridge.
• Aerodynamic flutter is regarded as major cause of
failure.
• Resonance effect and vortex shedding also caused
it to fail.
Aerodynamic Flutter in Bridge
• Tendency to aerodynamic flutter is present in all
flexible structures i.e. bridges, jet planes,
aeroplanes.
• It is possible only if structural and aerodynamic
forces are running at same frequency.
• Majority of researchers consider aerodynamic
flutter to be the main reason for the failure of
bridge.
Understanding Aerodynamic Flutter
• If a father is pushing his kid on swing then swing
would have a natural frequency. If swing would
come back to him after every 4 seconds, then to
maintain the motion of swing, father must push the
swing each time (after every 4 seconds) known as
external force applied with periodic frequency. If he
is not able to do so, he will damp the motion.
• If external periodic frequency matches natural
frequency, we get a resonance frequency. If this
phenomenon remains for some time, it will,
ultimately, cause amplitude to increase due to
proper timing of force i.e. failure of plane wings,
failure of deck of bridge.
Understanding Aerodynamic Flutter
(Contd…)
Tendency of a flexible
structure to aerodynamic
flutter causing vibration in
whole body.
Courtesy: Aerodynamic
Flutter analysis of plane
using ANSYS
Resonance
• We know that resonance happens when:
“Any system is vibrated at its natural frequency or
resonant frequency.”
• Take example of a rope.
You can think of resonance
as having the natural
frequency of the system
exactly in tune with your
force.
Resonance effect on the bridges
• In design of bridge, resonance phenomenon plays
an important role.
• This is susceptibility or tendency of any structure to
respond at an increased amplitude when frequency
of its oscillations meets its natural frequency.
• If it happens, severe vibrations are produced in the
structure causing ultimate failure.
• Many factors are involved in vibrations of bridge i.e.
vibrations due to traffic flow, heavy machinery, wind.
• One such affect was noted in Tacoma Narrows
Bridge e.g. wind.
Resonance effect on the bridges
(Contd…)
• If natural frequency of structure is achieved due to
any factor, it will cause more vibrations and more
storage of energy in the system. When this energy
exceeds an object’s load limits, structure will lose its
integrity.
• In case of Tacoma Narrows, when natural frequency
met frequency of wind blowing, it caused
denominator to be very small and therefore caused
increase in amplitude.
windnatural
wind
nsoscillatio
ff
F
A

 Nearly or
completely equal
to zero?
Vortex Shedding
• It happens when winds hits a structure, then
vortices of fluid (air) are formed at certain
frequency. When a vortex is formed on one side
of body (Say A), it immediately increases
pressure on side A causing decrease in velocity
in side A and ultimately causing less pressure on
other side (Say B) and more velocity.
• Due to these vortices, a fluctuating force on the
body is induced which causes vibrations in the
structure. If vibrations coincide with the natural
frequency or resonance frequency of structure,
they lead to failure.
Vortex Shedding (Contd…)
Imagine wind blowing from
left on the cable cross-
section.
• Small vortex of low pressure
• Move towards low pressure
Summary of Physics Analysis
Summarizing the whole analysis:
“A small vibration produced, assisted by the more
and more wind caused the natural frequency of
bridge to meet wind frequency which ultimately
resulted in an increase in the bridge oscillations.
Bridge oscillations increased with time and it
ultimately failed.
Vortex shedding, resonance phenomenon and
aerodynamic flutter were interlinked to each other in
sense of natural frequency of the structure”.
Bridge (1950)
• Soon after failure of bridge, it was expected to be
rebuilt with 1-1.5 years.
• Due to WW-II, its construction delayed.
• In 1950, new bridge was completed.
• Second bridge had truss-girders which allowed to
wind to pass through bridge easily.
• New bridge, being wide and thicker, had more
torsional stiffness than previous bridge.
• Wind tunnel test were also performed prior to its
construction on small scale model.
Bridge (1950) (Contd…)
1950 Tacoma Narrows Bridge
(1988)
Courtesy: Wikipedia
Bridge (2007)
• Due to high traffic flow, another bridge parallel to
1950 bridge was constructed to carry eastbound
traffic.
Westbound Bridge (1950)
Eastbound Bridge (2007)
Twin Bridges of Tacoma
Major difference between the two
(1940 & 1950)
• Following are some of differences between 1940 &
1950 suspension bridges:
1940 Bridge 1950 Bridge
Had two lanes Has four lanes
Less stiff More stiff
Less weight More weight
Use of plate girders Use of trusses
Wind-disturbance No wind-disturbance
2.4m deep plate girders 10m deep stiff trusses
A Lesson for New Design
• In modern suspension bridges construction, it is now
made mandatory to test the bridge model on small
scale prior to start its construction.
• Science of aerodynamic flutter in bridges was born
after the failure of Tacoma Narrows 1940.
• Effects of resonance on bridges and other flexible
structures were studied thoroughly.
• Vortex shedding and its affects on the bridge were
also taken into account.
• Wide use of open stiffening trusses to let wind pass
through started.
A lesson for New Design (Contd…)
• Increase in the weight of bridge because:
Vertical oscillations resistance ∝ Mass of bridge
• Increase in stiffness by using stiffening trusses and
more depth of deck.
Any Questions?

More Related Content

What's hot

Building structure project 1 report
Building structure project 1 reportBuilding structure project 1 report
Building structure project 1 report
Adelinetingg
 
The kansas city hyatt regency walkway collapse
The kansas city hyatt regency walkway collapseThe kansas city hyatt regency walkway collapse
The kansas city hyatt regency walkway collapse
Arpit Modh
 
Quebec Bridge Collapse - Case Study
Quebec Bridge Collapse - Case StudyQuebec Bridge Collapse - Case Study
Quebec Bridge Collapse - Case Study
Majzoob Mohammed
 
Brooklyn Bridge
Brooklyn BridgeBrooklyn Bridge
Brooklyn Bridge
jexpoz
 
Golden gate bridge
Golden gate bridgeGolden gate bridge
Golden gate bridge
Muzammil Ahmad
 
Empire state building.docx
Empire state building.docxEmpire state building.docx
Empire state building.docx
Ms Wilson
 
Golden gate bridge construction
Golden gate bridge constructionGolden gate bridge construction
Golden gate bridge construction
Nouman Tahir
 
Golden gate bridge, San Francisco
Golden gate bridge, San Francisco Golden gate bridge, San Francisco
Golden gate bridge, San Francisco
Ankur Saxena
 
Brooklyn Bridge: A Case sudy
Brooklyn Bridge: A Case sudyBrooklyn Bridge: A Case sudy
Brooklyn Bridge: A Case sudy
Bhavik A Shah
 
Burj khalifa
Burj khalifaBurj khalifa
Burj khalifa
Dinesh Rishi Bhoga
 
Golden gate bridge 2
Golden gate bridge 2Golden gate bridge 2
Golden gate bridge 2caltec
 
Howrah bridge ppt
Howrah bridge pptHowrah bridge ppt
Howrah bridge ppt
Sourav Roy
 
PowerPoint report of Hyatt Regency Walkway Collapse of 1981
PowerPoint report of Hyatt Regency Walkway Collapse of 1981PowerPoint report of Hyatt Regency Walkway Collapse of 1981
PowerPoint report of Hyatt Regency Walkway Collapse of 1981
Ash Bista
 
Burj khalifa
Burj khalifaBurj khalifa
Burj khalifa
MD DANIYAL
 
deep foundation.ppt
deep foundation.pptdeep foundation.ppt
deep foundation.ppt
avibose4
 
Leaning tower of Pisa
Leaning tower of PisaLeaning tower of Pisa
Leaning tower of Pisa
Sumit Shokeen
 
Safe Built Environment
Safe Built EnvironmentSafe Built Environment
Safe Built Environmentguest674fa
 
Skyscrapers ppt
Skyscrapers pptSkyscrapers ppt
Skyscrapers ppt
SAI KIRAN
 
Signature bridge ppt2
Signature bridge ppt2Signature bridge ppt2
Signature bridge ppt2
Rhythm Jaiswal
 

What's hot (20)

Building structure project 1 report
Building structure project 1 reportBuilding structure project 1 report
Building structure project 1 report
 
Golden gate bridge
Golden gate bridgeGolden gate bridge
Golden gate bridge
 
The kansas city hyatt regency walkway collapse
The kansas city hyatt regency walkway collapseThe kansas city hyatt regency walkway collapse
The kansas city hyatt regency walkway collapse
 
Quebec Bridge Collapse - Case Study
Quebec Bridge Collapse - Case StudyQuebec Bridge Collapse - Case Study
Quebec Bridge Collapse - Case Study
 
Brooklyn Bridge
Brooklyn BridgeBrooklyn Bridge
Brooklyn Bridge
 
Golden gate bridge
Golden gate bridgeGolden gate bridge
Golden gate bridge
 
Empire state building.docx
Empire state building.docxEmpire state building.docx
Empire state building.docx
 
Golden gate bridge construction
Golden gate bridge constructionGolden gate bridge construction
Golden gate bridge construction
 
Golden gate bridge, San Francisco
Golden gate bridge, San Francisco Golden gate bridge, San Francisco
Golden gate bridge, San Francisco
 
Brooklyn Bridge: A Case sudy
Brooklyn Bridge: A Case sudyBrooklyn Bridge: A Case sudy
Brooklyn Bridge: A Case sudy
 
Burj khalifa
Burj khalifaBurj khalifa
Burj khalifa
 
Golden gate bridge 2
Golden gate bridge 2Golden gate bridge 2
Golden gate bridge 2
 
Howrah bridge ppt
Howrah bridge pptHowrah bridge ppt
Howrah bridge ppt
 
PowerPoint report of Hyatt Regency Walkway Collapse of 1981
PowerPoint report of Hyatt Regency Walkway Collapse of 1981PowerPoint report of Hyatt Regency Walkway Collapse of 1981
PowerPoint report of Hyatt Regency Walkway Collapse of 1981
 
Burj khalifa
Burj khalifaBurj khalifa
Burj khalifa
 
deep foundation.ppt
deep foundation.pptdeep foundation.ppt
deep foundation.ppt
 
Leaning tower of Pisa
Leaning tower of PisaLeaning tower of Pisa
Leaning tower of Pisa
 
Safe Built Environment
Safe Built EnvironmentSafe Built Environment
Safe Built Environment
 
Skyscrapers ppt
Skyscrapers pptSkyscrapers ppt
Skyscrapers ppt
 
Signature bridge ppt2
Signature bridge ppt2Signature bridge ppt2
Signature bridge ppt2
 

Similar to Tacoma Narrows Suspension Bridge

Detailed outlineResearch question What happened to th.docx
Detailed outlineResearch question What happened to th.docxDetailed outlineResearch question What happened to th.docx
Detailed outlineResearch question What happened to th.docx
simonithomas47935
 
Case Study 7.3 249 CASE STUDY 7.3 Classic Case Tacoma Narrows Suspen.pdf
Case Study 7.3 249 CASE STUDY 7.3 Classic Case Tacoma Narrows Suspen.pdfCase Study 7.3 249 CASE STUDY 7.3 Classic Case Tacoma Narrows Suspen.pdf
Case Study 7.3 249 CASE STUDY 7.3 Classic Case Tacoma Narrows Suspen.pdf
SANDEEPARIHANT
 
Bombardem breakwaters
Bombardem breakwatersBombardem breakwaters
Bombardem breakwaters
Ajit Kumar
 
Engineering mistakes in the world
Engineering mistakes in the worldEngineering mistakes in the world
Engineering mistakes in the world
AnishaJalathota
 
Cub creative activity4_casestudies_v3_tedl_dwc
Cub creative activity4_casestudies_v3_tedl_dwcCub creative activity4_casestudies_v3_tedl_dwc
Cub creative activity4_casestudies_v3_tedl_dwc
Shelly Wilke
 
Ranjitha.S.H
Ranjitha.S.HRanjitha.S.H
Ranjitha.S.H
Ranjitha Shiravalalu
 
1 e bil - structures - 1st part - tacoma bridge
1 e bil - structures - 1st part - tacoma bridge1 e bil - structures - 1st part - tacoma bridge
1 e bil - structures - 1st part - tacoma bridge
algunastecnocosas
 
Study of tunnel engineering
Study of tunnel engineeringStudy of tunnel engineering
Study of tunnel engineering
Adil Shaikh
 
Structures - Tacoma bridge
Structures - Tacoma bridgeStructures - Tacoma bridge
Structures - Tacoma bridge
algunastecnocosas
 
theory_of_structures.ppt
theory_of_structures.ppttheory_of_structures.ppt
theory_of_structures.ppt
Amgad Fahmy
 
Suspension Bridges VS Cable-Stayed Bridges
Suspension Bridges VS Cable-Stayed BridgesSuspension Bridges VS Cable-Stayed Bridges
Suspension Bridges VS Cable-Stayed Bridges
Hussein Zidan
 
Suspension Bridges
Suspension BridgesSuspension Bridges
Suspension Bridges
Parikshit Hurukadli
 
Truss Bridge Research Paper
Truss Bridge Research PaperTruss Bridge Research Paper
Truss Bridge Research Paper
Ashley Jean
 
Forensic Engineering Prof Bambang Suhendro.pdf
Forensic Engineering Prof Bambang Suhendro.pdfForensic Engineering Prof Bambang Suhendro.pdf
Forensic Engineering Prof Bambang Suhendro.pdf
disaineronline
 
project report on truss bridge
project report on truss bridgeproject report on truss bridge
project report on truss bridgerajdutt1111
 
Final ppt of ts
Final ppt of tsFinal ppt of ts
Final ppt of ts
Mohd omer Ahmed
 
Submerged floating tunnel
Submerged floating tunnelSubmerged floating tunnel
Submerged floating tunnel
Shaikh Ismail
 
EFFECT OF COLUMN, BEAM SHAPE AND SHEAR WALL ON STOREY DRIFT
EFFECT OF COLUMN, BEAM SHAPE AND SHEAR WALL ON STOREY DRIFTEFFECT OF COLUMN, BEAM SHAPE AND SHEAR WALL ON STOREY DRIFT
EFFECT OF COLUMN, BEAM SHAPE AND SHEAR WALL ON STOREY DRIFT
Khaza Ahmed Palash
 

Similar to Tacoma Narrows Suspension Bridge (19)

Detailed outlineResearch question What happened to th.docx
Detailed outlineResearch question What happened to th.docxDetailed outlineResearch question What happened to th.docx
Detailed outlineResearch question What happened to th.docx
 
Case Study 7.3 249 CASE STUDY 7.3 Classic Case Tacoma Narrows Suspen.pdf
Case Study 7.3 249 CASE STUDY 7.3 Classic Case Tacoma Narrows Suspen.pdfCase Study 7.3 249 CASE STUDY 7.3 Classic Case Tacoma Narrows Suspen.pdf
Case Study 7.3 249 CASE STUDY 7.3 Classic Case Tacoma Narrows Suspen.pdf
 
Bombardem breakwaters
Bombardem breakwatersBombardem breakwaters
Bombardem breakwaters
 
Engineering mistakes in the world
Engineering mistakes in the worldEngineering mistakes in the world
Engineering mistakes in the world
 
Cub creative activity4_casestudies_v3_tedl_dwc
Cub creative activity4_casestudies_v3_tedl_dwcCub creative activity4_casestudies_v3_tedl_dwc
Cub creative activity4_casestudies_v3_tedl_dwc
 
Ranjitha.S.H
Ranjitha.S.HRanjitha.S.H
Ranjitha.S.H
 
1 e bil - structures - 1st part - tacoma bridge
1 e bil - structures - 1st part - tacoma bridge1 e bil - structures - 1st part - tacoma bridge
1 e bil - structures - 1st part - tacoma bridge
 
Study of tunnel engineering
Study of tunnel engineeringStudy of tunnel engineering
Study of tunnel engineering
 
Structures - Tacoma bridge
Structures - Tacoma bridgeStructures - Tacoma bridge
Structures - Tacoma bridge
 
theory_of_structures.ppt
theory_of_structures.ppttheory_of_structures.ppt
theory_of_structures.ppt
 
Suspension Bridges VS Cable-Stayed Bridges
Suspension Bridges VS Cable-Stayed BridgesSuspension Bridges VS Cable-Stayed Bridges
Suspension Bridges VS Cable-Stayed Bridges
 
Suspension Bridges
Suspension BridgesSuspension Bridges
Suspension Bridges
 
Truss Bridge Research Paper
Truss Bridge Research PaperTruss Bridge Research Paper
Truss Bridge Research Paper
 
Forensic Engineering Prof Bambang Suhendro.pdf
Forensic Engineering Prof Bambang Suhendro.pdfForensic Engineering Prof Bambang Suhendro.pdf
Forensic Engineering Prof Bambang Suhendro.pdf
 
bridges.ppt
bridges.pptbridges.ppt
bridges.ppt
 
project report on truss bridge
project report on truss bridgeproject report on truss bridge
project report on truss bridge
 
Final ppt of ts
Final ppt of tsFinal ppt of ts
Final ppt of ts
 
Submerged floating tunnel
Submerged floating tunnelSubmerged floating tunnel
Submerged floating tunnel
 
EFFECT OF COLUMN, BEAM SHAPE AND SHEAR WALL ON STOREY DRIFT
EFFECT OF COLUMN, BEAM SHAPE AND SHEAR WALL ON STOREY DRIFTEFFECT OF COLUMN, BEAM SHAPE AND SHEAR WALL ON STOREY DRIFT
EFFECT OF COLUMN, BEAM SHAPE AND SHEAR WALL ON STOREY DRIFT
 

Recently uploaded

weather web application report.pdf
weather web application report.pdfweather web application report.pdf
weather web application report.pdf
Pratik Pawar
 
Harnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming Pipelines
Harnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming PipelinesHarnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming Pipelines
Harnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming Pipelines
Christina Lin
 
DfMAy 2024 - key insights and contributions
DfMAy 2024 - key insights and contributionsDfMAy 2024 - key insights and contributions
DfMAy 2024 - key insights and contributions
gestioneergodomus
 
Governing Equations for Fundamental Aerodynamics_Anderson2010.pdf
Governing Equations for Fundamental Aerodynamics_Anderson2010.pdfGoverning Equations for Fundamental Aerodynamics_Anderson2010.pdf
Governing Equations for Fundamental Aerodynamics_Anderson2010.pdf
WENKENLI1
 
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdf
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdfHybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdf
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdf
fxintegritypublishin
 
Tutorial for 16S rRNA Gene Analysis with QIIME2.pdf
Tutorial for 16S rRNA Gene Analysis with QIIME2.pdfTutorial for 16S rRNA Gene Analysis with QIIME2.pdf
Tutorial for 16S rRNA Gene Analysis with QIIME2.pdf
aqil azizi
 
Recycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part III
Recycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part IIIRecycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part III
Recycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part III
Aditya Rajan Patra
 
Gen AI Study Jams _ For the GDSC Leads in India.pdf
Gen AI Study Jams _ For the GDSC Leads in India.pdfGen AI Study Jams _ For the GDSC Leads in India.pdf
Gen AI Study Jams _ For the GDSC Leads in India.pdf
gdsczhcet
 
Design and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&B
Design and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&BDesign and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&B
Design and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&B
Sreedhar Chowdam
 
DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF A CAR SHOWROOM USING E TABS
DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF A CAR SHOWROOM USING E TABSDESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF A CAR SHOWROOM USING E TABS
DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF A CAR SHOWROOM USING E TABS
itech2017
 
AKS UNIVERSITY Satna Final Year Project By OM Hardaha.pdf
AKS UNIVERSITY Satna Final Year Project By OM Hardaha.pdfAKS UNIVERSITY Satna Final Year Project By OM Hardaha.pdf
AKS UNIVERSITY Satna Final Year Project By OM Hardaha.pdf
SamSarthak3
 
NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER IN CONDENSING HEAT EXCHANGERS...
NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER IN CONDENSING HEAT EXCHANGERS...NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER IN CONDENSING HEAT EXCHANGERS...
NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER IN CONDENSING HEAT EXCHANGERS...
ssuser7dcef0
 
Fundamentals of Induction Motor Drives.pptx
Fundamentals of Induction Motor Drives.pptxFundamentals of Induction Motor Drives.pptx
Fundamentals of Induction Motor Drives.pptx
manasideore6
 
Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...
Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...
Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...
Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
PPT on GRP pipes manufacturing and testing
PPT on GRP pipes manufacturing and testingPPT on GRP pipes manufacturing and testing
PPT on GRP pipes manufacturing and testing
anoopmanoharan2
 
6th International Conference on Machine Learning & Applications (CMLA 2024)
6th International Conference on Machine Learning & Applications (CMLA 2024)6th International Conference on Machine Learning & Applications (CMLA 2024)
6th International Conference on Machine Learning & Applications (CMLA 2024)
ClaraZara1
 
Building Electrical System Design & Installation
Building Electrical System Design & InstallationBuilding Electrical System Design & Installation
Building Electrical System Design & Installation
symbo111
 
Planning Of Procurement o different goods and services
Planning Of Procurement o different goods and servicesPlanning Of Procurement o different goods and services
Planning Of Procurement o different goods and services
JoytuBarua2
 
Understanding Inductive Bias in Machine Learning
Understanding Inductive Bias in Machine LearningUnderstanding Inductive Bias in Machine Learning
Understanding Inductive Bias in Machine Learning
SUTEJAS
 
Investor-Presentation-Q1FY2024 investor presentation document.pptx
Investor-Presentation-Q1FY2024 investor presentation document.pptxInvestor-Presentation-Q1FY2024 investor presentation document.pptx
Investor-Presentation-Q1FY2024 investor presentation document.pptx
AmarGB2
 

Recently uploaded (20)

weather web application report.pdf
weather web application report.pdfweather web application report.pdf
weather web application report.pdf
 
Harnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming Pipelines
Harnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming PipelinesHarnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming Pipelines
Harnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming Pipelines
 
DfMAy 2024 - key insights and contributions
DfMAy 2024 - key insights and contributionsDfMAy 2024 - key insights and contributions
DfMAy 2024 - key insights and contributions
 
Governing Equations for Fundamental Aerodynamics_Anderson2010.pdf
Governing Equations for Fundamental Aerodynamics_Anderson2010.pdfGoverning Equations for Fundamental Aerodynamics_Anderson2010.pdf
Governing Equations for Fundamental Aerodynamics_Anderson2010.pdf
 
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdf
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdfHybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdf
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdf
 
Tutorial for 16S rRNA Gene Analysis with QIIME2.pdf
Tutorial for 16S rRNA Gene Analysis with QIIME2.pdfTutorial for 16S rRNA Gene Analysis with QIIME2.pdf
Tutorial for 16S rRNA Gene Analysis with QIIME2.pdf
 
Recycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part III
Recycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part IIIRecycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part III
Recycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part III
 
Gen AI Study Jams _ For the GDSC Leads in India.pdf
Gen AI Study Jams _ For the GDSC Leads in India.pdfGen AI Study Jams _ For the GDSC Leads in India.pdf
Gen AI Study Jams _ For the GDSC Leads in India.pdf
 
Design and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&B
Design and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&BDesign and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&B
Design and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&B
 
DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF A CAR SHOWROOM USING E TABS
DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF A CAR SHOWROOM USING E TABSDESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF A CAR SHOWROOM USING E TABS
DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF A CAR SHOWROOM USING E TABS
 
AKS UNIVERSITY Satna Final Year Project By OM Hardaha.pdf
AKS UNIVERSITY Satna Final Year Project By OM Hardaha.pdfAKS UNIVERSITY Satna Final Year Project By OM Hardaha.pdf
AKS UNIVERSITY Satna Final Year Project By OM Hardaha.pdf
 
NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER IN CONDENSING HEAT EXCHANGERS...
NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER IN CONDENSING HEAT EXCHANGERS...NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER IN CONDENSING HEAT EXCHANGERS...
NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER IN CONDENSING HEAT EXCHANGERS...
 
Fundamentals of Induction Motor Drives.pptx
Fundamentals of Induction Motor Drives.pptxFundamentals of Induction Motor Drives.pptx
Fundamentals of Induction Motor Drives.pptx
 
Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...
Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...
Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...
 
PPT on GRP pipes manufacturing and testing
PPT on GRP pipes manufacturing and testingPPT on GRP pipes manufacturing and testing
PPT on GRP pipes manufacturing and testing
 
6th International Conference on Machine Learning & Applications (CMLA 2024)
6th International Conference on Machine Learning & Applications (CMLA 2024)6th International Conference on Machine Learning & Applications (CMLA 2024)
6th International Conference on Machine Learning & Applications (CMLA 2024)
 
Building Electrical System Design & Installation
Building Electrical System Design & InstallationBuilding Electrical System Design & Installation
Building Electrical System Design & Installation
 
Planning Of Procurement o different goods and services
Planning Of Procurement o different goods and servicesPlanning Of Procurement o different goods and services
Planning Of Procurement o different goods and services
 
Understanding Inductive Bias in Machine Learning
Understanding Inductive Bias in Machine LearningUnderstanding Inductive Bias in Machine Learning
Understanding Inductive Bias in Machine Learning
 
Investor-Presentation-Q1FY2024 investor presentation document.pptx
Investor-Presentation-Q1FY2024 investor presentation document.pptxInvestor-Presentation-Q1FY2024 investor presentation document.pptx
Investor-Presentation-Q1FY2024 investor presentation document.pptx
 

Tacoma Narrows Suspension Bridge

  • 1. Tacoma Narrows Suspension Bridge Presented by: Muhammad Asad Hayat, 14-CE-148 Civil Engineering Department, UET Taxila
  • 2. Introduction • Tacoma Narrows Suspension Bridge was constructed in the Washington D.C., a state in United States, that connected the Tacoma Narrows strait of Puget Sound (‘Sound’: narrow channel of the sea joining two larger bodies of water) between Tacoma and the Kitsap Peninsula. • This bridge collapsed just four months after its construction. • It was world’s 3rd longest suspension bridge in the world at the time of its failure.
  • 3. Introduction (Contd…) • Total cost of bridge was 6.4 million U.S.D (105 million USD in 2012). • Total structure length was 5939 ft with 5000 ft suspension span and it consisted of three spans, one central suspension span or deck and two short suspension spans one each side. Lengths of spans were as follows: 1. 1st Short Suspension Span (1100 ft) 2. Central Span (2800 ft) 3. 2nd Short Suspension Span (1100 ft)
  • 4. Introduction (Contd…) • Center span (Height above water) = 195 ft • Width of roadway = 26 ft • Width of sidewalk (On each side) = 5 ft • Height of East Pier = 247 ft • Height of West Pier = 198 ft • Height, Towers above piers = 425 ft
  • 6. Main Cable Deck Anchorage Main Towers 1st Short Span 2nd Short Span Center Span Bridge at the time of its inauguration ceremony, 1940 E W N S
  • 7. Need of Bridge • This bridge, constructed in two years, was designed to join Tacoma and less-developed Kitsap Peninsula which could result in increase in development and population in both areas. • Bridge also benefited the US Military (Air Force and Navy) connecting their air fields and ship yards. • A road could be constructed to connect these two places, but it cost more money than to construct a bridge. • Bridge was designed to hold 60,000 cars.
  • 8. Historical Background and Funding • Need of a bridge to connect two cities dates back to 1889 but concreted efforts began in 1920s. • Initial design of bridge was given by Clark Eldridge in 1938 who was Washington State Engineer. • Leon Moisseiff, New York bridge engineer who served as designer and consultant engineer for the Golden Gate Bridge - petitioned the PWA (Public Works Administration) and the RFC (Reconstruction Finance Corporation) to build the bridge for less. Moisseiff proposed shallower support which cost less. Moisseiff’s design won out.
  • 9. Historical Background and Funding (Contd…) Initial design of bridge by Eldridge, 23 May 1938 Safe Design ? Eldridge proposed truss deck for the bridge so that wind could easily pass through it.
  • 11. Movements during Construction • A small movement in deck of bridge was noted many times by workers even during the construction of the bridge when wind blew. A small vibration could be expected in a bridge but vibrations produced in this bridge were not normal. • Engineers were aware that bridge was prone to motion. • Retrofitting to design, as bridge construction progressed, by new ideas from engineers was also done.
  • 12. Prevention of Movements • Retrofitting of bridge, to avoid the movements and stiffen the bridge, as mentioned earlier was done by installing hydraulic jacks and tie down cables. Tie-down cables
  • 13. Failure • Analytical studies have shown that this bridge failed due to winds running at 64 km/h velocity in the Eastern direction on 7th of November, 1940. • In fact, “Tacoma Narrows was made with wind-resisting plate girders rather than deep stiffening trusses.” • In design of bridge, aerodynamic forces were not taken into account due to which winds running at 64km/h speed in one direction caused it to fail.
  • 14. Failure (Contd…) Twisting of deck of the bridge due to wind action
  • 15. Failure (Contd…) • Bridge was too skinny, fragile and flexible. It had only two lanes, less mass. • The wind exerted a lot of pressure, assisted by more and more severe aerodynamic forces, and made waves which caused the bridge to twist and collapse in water. • During the collapse, the main suspension cables were thrown violently side to side, twisted, and tossed many feet into the air. • On the north cable at midspan, where the support cable had loosened, it broke more than 350 wires.
  • 16. Failure (Contd…) • Other wires were severely distorted. The main cables were a total loss. Their only value was as scrap metal. Ultimate Collapse Courtesy: Wikipedia
  • 17. Failure (Contd…) Bridge after failure (Center span crashed)
  • 18. Torsional (Twisting) Movements at the time of failure The nature and severity of the torsional movement is revealed in this image taken from the Tacoma end of the suspension span. When the twisting motion was at the maximum, elevation of the footpath at the right was 28 feet (9m) higher than the footpath at left side of the bridge.
  • 19. Torsional (Twisting) Movements at the time of failure (Contd…) Aerodynamic forces causing torsional movements
  • 20. Damages to Side Spans • Side spans, which became unbalanced, were too severely damaged. • Sag of approximately 45 feet appeared in both side spans.
  • 21. What does Physics say about failure? • Vertical Oscillations or Torsional Movements, as mentioned earlier, were noted during construction of bridge. • Aerodynamic flutter is regarded as major cause of failure. • Resonance effect and vortex shedding also caused it to fail.
  • 22. Aerodynamic Flutter in Bridge • Tendency to aerodynamic flutter is present in all flexible structures i.e. bridges, jet planes, aeroplanes. • It is possible only if structural and aerodynamic forces are running at same frequency. • Majority of researchers consider aerodynamic flutter to be the main reason for the failure of bridge.
  • 23. Understanding Aerodynamic Flutter • If a father is pushing his kid on swing then swing would have a natural frequency. If swing would come back to him after every 4 seconds, then to maintain the motion of swing, father must push the swing each time (after every 4 seconds) known as external force applied with periodic frequency. If he is not able to do so, he will damp the motion. • If external periodic frequency matches natural frequency, we get a resonance frequency. If this phenomenon remains for some time, it will, ultimately, cause amplitude to increase due to proper timing of force i.e. failure of plane wings, failure of deck of bridge.
  • 24. Understanding Aerodynamic Flutter (Contd…) Tendency of a flexible structure to aerodynamic flutter causing vibration in whole body. Courtesy: Aerodynamic Flutter analysis of plane using ANSYS
  • 25. Resonance • We know that resonance happens when: “Any system is vibrated at its natural frequency or resonant frequency.” • Take example of a rope. You can think of resonance as having the natural frequency of the system exactly in tune with your force.
  • 26. Resonance effect on the bridges • In design of bridge, resonance phenomenon plays an important role. • This is susceptibility or tendency of any structure to respond at an increased amplitude when frequency of its oscillations meets its natural frequency. • If it happens, severe vibrations are produced in the structure causing ultimate failure. • Many factors are involved in vibrations of bridge i.e. vibrations due to traffic flow, heavy machinery, wind. • One such affect was noted in Tacoma Narrows Bridge e.g. wind.
  • 27. Resonance effect on the bridges (Contd…) • If natural frequency of structure is achieved due to any factor, it will cause more vibrations and more storage of energy in the system. When this energy exceeds an object’s load limits, structure will lose its integrity. • In case of Tacoma Narrows, when natural frequency met frequency of wind blowing, it caused denominator to be very small and therefore caused increase in amplitude. windnatural wind nsoscillatio ff F A   Nearly or completely equal to zero?
  • 28. Vortex Shedding • It happens when winds hits a structure, then vortices of fluid (air) are formed at certain frequency. When a vortex is formed on one side of body (Say A), it immediately increases pressure on side A causing decrease in velocity in side A and ultimately causing less pressure on other side (Say B) and more velocity. • Due to these vortices, a fluctuating force on the body is induced which causes vibrations in the structure. If vibrations coincide with the natural frequency or resonance frequency of structure, they lead to failure.
  • 29. Vortex Shedding (Contd…) Imagine wind blowing from left on the cable cross- section. • Small vortex of low pressure • Move towards low pressure
  • 30. Summary of Physics Analysis Summarizing the whole analysis: “A small vibration produced, assisted by the more and more wind caused the natural frequency of bridge to meet wind frequency which ultimately resulted in an increase in the bridge oscillations. Bridge oscillations increased with time and it ultimately failed. Vortex shedding, resonance phenomenon and aerodynamic flutter were interlinked to each other in sense of natural frequency of the structure”.
  • 31. Bridge (1950) • Soon after failure of bridge, it was expected to be rebuilt with 1-1.5 years. • Due to WW-II, its construction delayed. • In 1950, new bridge was completed. • Second bridge had truss-girders which allowed to wind to pass through bridge easily. • New bridge, being wide and thicker, had more torsional stiffness than previous bridge. • Wind tunnel test were also performed prior to its construction on small scale model.
  • 32. Bridge (1950) (Contd…) 1950 Tacoma Narrows Bridge (1988) Courtesy: Wikipedia
  • 33. Bridge (2007) • Due to high traffic flow, another bridge parallel to 1950 bridge was constructed to carry eastbound traffic. Westbound Bridge (1950) Eastbound Bridge (2007) Twin Bridges of Tacoma
  • 34. Major difference between the two (1940 & 1950) • Following are some of differences between 1940 & 1950 suspension bridges: 1940 Bridge 1950 Bridge Had two lanes Has four lanes Less stiff More stiff Less weight More weight Use of plate girders Use of trusses Wind-disturbance No wind-disturbance 2.4m deep plate girders 10m deep stiff trusses
  • 35. A Lesson for New Design • In modern suspension bridges construction, it is now made mandatory to test the bridge model on small scale prior to start its construction. • Science of aerodynamic flutter in bridges was born after the failure of Tacoma Narrows 1940. • Effects of resonance on bridges and other flexible structures were studied thoroughly. • Vortex shedding and its affects on the bridge were also taken into account. • Wide use of open stiffening trusses to let wind pass through started.
  • 36. A lesson for New Design (Contd…) • Increase in the weight of bridge because: Vertical oscillations resistance ∝ Mass of bridge • Increase in stiffness by using stiffening trusses and more depth of deck.