Realizing Governance 2.0: Capturing the Value of Networked Citizens and the Fifth Estate. Presentation for the Institute of Communication and New Technologies, University Mayor, Chile, 29 July 2011.
Lee Rainie, Director of Internet and Technology Research at the Pew Research Center, presented this material on October 14, 2020 at a gathering sponsored by the International Institute of Communications. He described the most recent Center public opinion surveys since mid-March, covering the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak, racial justice protests that began in the summer, and the final stages of the 2020 presidential election campaign. He particularly examined how and why people are using the internet in the midst of multiple national crises and their concerns about digital divide and homework gap issues. And he covered how the Center has researched the impact of misinformation in recent years.
Realizing Governance 2.0: Capturing the Value of Networked Citizens and the Fifth Estate. Presentation for the Institute of Communication and New Technologies, University Mayor, Chile, 29 July 2011.
Lee Rainie, Director of Internet and Technology Research at the Pew Research Center, presented this material on October 14, 2020 at a gathering sponsored by the International Institute of Communications. He described the most recent Center public opinion surveys since mid-March, covering the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak, racial justice protests that began in the summer, and the final stages of the 2020 presidential election campaign. He particularly examined how and why people are using the internet in the midst of multiple national crises and their concerns about digital divide and homework gap issues. And he covered how the Center has researched the impact of misinformation in recent years.
Digital Sovereigns or Consent of the NetworkedMsifry
In this class, we looked at the reality of Chinese and Russian internet usage, where authoritarian governments have so far succeeded in boxing in the disruptive effects of networked mass communication.
Dr. Alan Borning (University of Washington Computer Science professor emeritus), presents and leads a discussion on the true costs of "free" services such as Facebook, Twitter, Google, etc.
Lee Rainie, Director of Internet and Technology Research at the Pew Research Center, presented this material on October 29, 2020 to scholars, policy makers and civil society advocates convened by New York University’s Governance Lab (GovLab). He described findings from two canvassings of hundreds of technology and democracy experts that captured their views about the future of democracy and the future of social and civic innovation by the year 2030. Among other subjects, the experts looked at the impact of misinformation, “techlash” and trust in government institutions.
Towards the de-Institutionalisation of e-democratic governance?Io Partecipo
Speech by Brian D. Loader - University of York - at the conference “E-democracy 2.0. Istituzioni, cittadini, nuove reti: un lessico possibile” [Bologna, 8 aprile 2009].
From broadcast to networks: Tools & changing landscapes in the Third SectorWe Are Social
We Are Social's approach to strategic social media campaigning for NGOs and the Third Sector. keynote presentation delivered at the Media Trust's Spring Conference, Tuesday 16th March 2010.
The power of Big Tech has been growing slowly, and in a way that many of us have accommodated as a necessary infiltration. But the scope of that power—and its costs to the culture we have ordered—have been less transparent.
Learning to crowd-surf: Gov 2.0 and community engagementPatrick McCormick
what are the implications of social media, the Internet and new technologies for community engagement and how do traditional and new ways of engagement complement each other to create new opportunities through Gov 2.0 initiatives and co-production?
Futur gov -cc11-ws-objectives and agendaCitadelh2020
The agenda of the meeting and the workshop promoted by a FuturGov2030 initiative with other Cultural-Cooperation-11 projects. The meeting is oriented to all that are interested, now or in the future, to exchange information, share knowledge and develop synergies among involved projects.
Digital Sovereigns or Consent of the NetworkedMsifry
In this class, we looked at the reality of Chinese and Russian internet usage, where authoritarian governments have so far succeeded in boxing in the disruptive effects of networked mass communication.
Dr. Alan Borning (University of Washington Computer Science professor emeritus), presents and leads a discussion on the true costs of "free" services such as Facebook, Twitter, Google, etc.
Lee Rainie, Director of Internet and Technology Research at the Pew Research Center, presented this material on October 29, 2020 to scholars, policy makers and civil society advocates convened by New York University’s Governance Lab (GovLab). He described findings from two canvassings of hundreds of technology and democracy experts that captured their views about the future of democracy and the future of social and civic innovation by the year 2030. Among other subjects, the experts looked at the impact of misinformation, “techlash” and trust in government institutions.
Towards the de-Institutionalisation of e-democratic governance?Io Partecipo
Speech by Brian D. Loader - University of York - at the conference “E-democracy 2.0. Istituzioni, cittadini, nuove reti: un lessico possibile” [Bologna, 8 aprile 2009].
From broadcast to networks: Tools & changing landscapes in the Third SectorWe Are Social
We Are Social's approach to strategic social media campaigning for NGOs and the Third Sector. keynote presentation delivered at the Media Trust's Spring Conference, Tuesday 16th March 2010.
The power of Big Tech has been growing slowly, and in a way that many of us have accommodated as a necessary infiltration. But the scope of that power—and its costs to the culture we have ordered—have been less transparent.
Learning to crowd-surf: Gov 2.0 and community engagementPatrick McCormick
what are the implications of social media, the Internet and new technologies for community engagement and how do traditional and new ways of engagement complement each other to create new opportunities through Gov 2.0 initiatives and co-production?
Futur gov -cc11-ws-objectives and agendaCitadelh2020
The agenda of the meeting and the workshop promoted by a FuturGov2030 initiative with other Cultural-Cooperation-11 projects. The meeting is oriented to all that are interested, now or in the future, to exchange information, share knowledge and develop synergies among involved projects.
Will blockchain emerge as a tool to break the poverty chain in the Global South?eraser Juan José Calderón
Will blockchain emerge as a tool to break the poverty chain in the Global South?. Nir Kshetri
ABSTRACT
Just like its recent predecessors, blockchain – also known as the
distributed ledger technology – is considered to have the potential
to cause major economic, political and social transformations in the
Global South. The visible effects of this technology are already being
noted there. We present early evidence linking the use of blockchain in
overcoming some economic, social and political challenges facing the
Global South. The article highlights the key applications and uses of
blockchain in developing countries. It demonstrates how blockchain
can help promote transparency, build trust and reputation, and
enhance efficiency in transactions. The article looks at opportunities
and key triggers for blockchain diffusion in these countries. It also
delves into challenges and obstacles that developing economies are
likely to encounter in the use of blockchain.
The Politics of Open Data: Past, Present and FutureJonathan Gray
Slides for presentation on “The Politics of Open Data: Past, Present and Future” at the Data Power conference at the University of Sheffield, 22nd June 2015.
untitled folder/IMG_0122.PNG
__MACOSX/untitled folder/._IMG_0122.PNG
untitled folder/IMG_0123.PNG
__MACOSX/untitled folder/._IMG_0123.PNG
untitled folder/IMG_0124.PNG
__MACOSX/untitled folder/._IMG_0124.PNG
untitled folder/IMG_0125.PNG
__MACOSX/untitled folder/._IMG_0125.PNG
untitled folder/IMG_0126.PNG
__MACOSX/untitled folder/._IMG_0126.PNG
The Impact of ICT on Chinese State Council
The world has been changed dramatically for last 30 years. Things that on body would expect in the past are taking place every day. Some hot topics that people used to focus on have been replaced by some new topics. Among all these topics, ICT namely information communication technologies is attracting more and more people’s attention. As we all know that ICT is impacting nearly all aspects of our life and here I adopt the economic development as the breakthrough point, and in turn other aspects is being expanded. This thesis will mainly discuss on the impact of ICT on Chinese State Council.
The State Council of The people's Republic of China, is the executive body of the highest organ of state power, is the highest organ of state administration. The function of the state council covers many aspects for the society, such as the draft of constitution and laws, the development of economy and also the culture and education and so forth. And ICT has impacted almost every aspect of the origination.
First, the dissemination of information has been changed. ICT is a effective tool of political communication, because it has more advantages than face-to-face communication. The ICT disseminate information to the whole society, helps all the citizens to obtain information about the current political situation, become "known citizens", providing information for the foundation of its political participation. And also this would be impact of public opinion. ICT is not only the performance of public opinion channel, and may utilize extensive and in-depth coverage of specific events, attracts public attention to the event, and thus mobilize the whole society. Thus make as many people as possible to react on the current topic comment.
In the old days, the communication technology in China is not less developed. In some of the rural areas, there are even not a telephone or fax, let alone internet service. The information dissemination is mainly depends on face to face communication or speakers. There are certainly many limitations of these tools. You may not find the person you want to talk to or when you broadcast your information in the radio speaker, some one may just doing something and cannot listen to what you say. Thus they miss the information. That’s why a lot of people just break the laws due to the lack of knowledge of laws and regulations in the country. They may not participate in the politics and execute their own right or do their own duty. But nowadays, with the development of information communication technologies, there are many different channels to ...
An overview of current Open Data activities and approaches and our own approach to manage and develop Open Data projects using Linked Data as the technical piece for the best results in the long run. Prepared for ICT 2010, http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/events/cf/ict2010/item-display.cfm?id=2790
These are the slides from a presentation I gave at the Yorkshire Grantmakers Forum 25th Anniversary, looking at what the next 25 years might hold in terms of technological, social and political change.
How open data and social media can work together to solve some of government's big problems. (Presented to the California Democratic Party Internet Caucus at Stanford University, Feb. 5, 2011.)
Written by Digital Brand, this paper seeks to explain the genesis and evolution of the concept of “open” government within the context of changing forms of government within the web-driven world, a world where emerging web technologies are empowering the citizen as never before, providing access to vast quantities of information which, despite being presented out of context and often in a complex format, is nonetheless available and freely open to use and reuse.
My presentation at https://openaire.eu/research-policy-monitoring-in-the-era-of-open-science-and-big-data-the-what-indicators-and-the-how-infrastructures
4. Relevant for key government activities source: “Web 2.0 in Government: Why and How? www.jrc.es Back office Front office Regulation Cross-agency collaboration Knowledge management Interoperability Human resources mgmt Public procurement Service delivery eParticipation Law enforcement Public sector information Public communication Transparency and accountability
5. Technologies… Blogs Wordpress, Movable Type, Blogger, Typepad Wikis Wikipedia, Twiki, Confluence, SocialText Syndication RSS, Atom News feed aggregation Google Reader, Bloglines, NewsGator Personal dashboards / mashups Netvibes, MyYahoo, iGoogle, Yahoo Pipes Bookmarking / Tagging Delicious, Cogenz, ConnectBeam Micro-blogging/messaging Twitter, Yammer, Socialtext Signals Instant messaging Sametime, MSN, Skype Social Networking Platforms (Enterprise) Facebook, Bebo, Myspace, Tuenti, Netlog IBM (Lotus Connections), Socialtext Confluence, Jive (Social Business Software) Thoughtfarmer, Microsoft (Office Sharepoint Server 2007), Oracle (Beehive), Incentivelive, Salesforce Chatter Prediction Markets Consensus Point, Inkling Ideas banks Uservoice, Ideascale
![Gov2.0 in Switzerland: from conversation to action ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/swissgov-100924070541-phpapp02/85/Swissgov-presentation-23rd-September-2010-1-320.jpg)
![Structure of the talk ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()