This document describes a student sponsorship system that uses a weighted sum method to rank students based on criteria. It discusses objectives to design a system for students with religious certificates, implement a weighted ranking method, and test the system. It also outlines problems with current manual systems, including legibility, efficiency, and potential for human error in selection. The project scope defines users and system modules for registration, login, forms, criteria management, and reporting. It then explains the methodology, including context and entity relationship diagrams, data flow diagrams, algorithm complexity using the weighted sum formula, and prototypes of the user interfaces.

1. STUDENT
SPONSORSHIP SYSTEM
BY USING
WEIGHTED SUM METHOD
RAJA NURSYUHADA BINTI RAJA ARIF
040201
BACHELOR OF COMPUTER SCIENCE( SOFTWARE DEVELOPEMENT)
DR WAN AEZWANI BINTI WAN ABU BAKAR

2. OBJECTIVES
 To design Student Sponsorship System(3S) especially student that have tahfiz certificate with STAM
certificate.
 To implement Weighted Sum Method in Student Sponsorship System(3S) to find ranking based on
criteria.
 To test and evaluate the system for its functionality.

3. PROBLEM STATEMENT
• Using form as manually may not be practical nowadays and it is not
efficient. By fill in the form manually will occur the situation which is hard
to understand hand writing of the applicant. It is also wasting of time
because need to go for the interview and also difficult for the student to
go for the interview place if the location are far from their place.
• Student which is study in the Middle East usually does not get sponsor
before they are study abroad. This make the student need to go to many
places to get some donation or their parent need to support them. From
this situation, not all family are able to support for all the academic
financing.
• The selection also can be ineffective due to misunderstanding answer of
the student during the interview session. It may be happen because of
human mistake. The tendency for the mistakes occur is high also due to
miscalculation of the criteria on choosing the student.

4. PROJECT SCOPE
• Users Scope
1) Admin
i. Able to login as admin
ii. Able to register student and sponsor
iii. Able to manage student criteria
iv. Able to make a report for student and sponsor
2) Student
i. Able to login as student
ii. Able to fill in the online form
iii. Able to view the report
3) Sponsor
i.Able to login as sponsor
ii.Able to view the report

5. System Scope
• Register Module
• Login Module
• Form Module
• Calculate the mark of student detail
• Generate report

6. CHAPTER 3
METHODOLOGY

7. CONTEXT DIAGRAM
• Is drawn in order to define and clarify the boundaries of the software
system. It use to identify the flows of the information between the
system and external entities.

8. Entity Relationship Diagram
• Illustrates system entities information and entities relationship. ERD
composes of three things which is identifying entities, determine entities
interaction and cardinality of the relationship.

10. DATA FLOW DIAGRAM

11. DATA
FLOW
DIAGRAM
LEVEL 0

12. DATA FLOW DIAGRAM
LEVEL 1
(MANAGE STUDENT)

13. DATA FLOW DIAGRAM
LEVEL 1
(MANAGE CRITERIA)

14. FRAMEWORK

15. ALGORITHM COMPLEXITY
Formula of Weighted Sum Method
j weighted sum = w1j1 +w2j2 + …. + wnjn
Where ;
w = the weights
j = the value,

16. • Example
- Student 1 : (4 x 0.1) + (5 x 0.12) + (4
x 0.9) + (4 x 0.1) + (4 x 0.1) + (3 x 0.6)
= 7.2
- Student 2 : (1 x 0.1) + (3 x 0.12) + (2
x 0.9) + (1 x 0.1) + (1 x 0.1) + (1 x 0.6)
= 3.06
* From the result obtained, student
1 is the greatest value for the weight
specified, thus student 1 is an
alternative that chosen as the best
alternative to get a sponsorship
field.
• Total weight = (pngk *pngkweight) + (koko * kokoweight) + (position *
positionweight) + (fatherIncome * fatherIncomeweight) + (motherIncome *
motherIncomeweight) + (noDepenParent * noDepenParenweight)

17. PROOF OF CONCEPT

18. INTERFACE
BEFORE
LOGIN

19. STUDENT
INTERFACE

21. SPONSOR
INTERFACE

22. ADMIN
INTERFACE

27. THANK YOU!!