Most organizations understand that the software they develop and deploy
exposes them to risk from attackers. However the scope of the problem can
be daunting. This talk looks at challenges organizations face when trying
to structure and scale their application security programs and looks at
strategies leading organizations have adopted to help make them
successful. Using OWASP's Open Software Assurance Maturity Model
(OpenSAMM), the presentation looks at how development teams can plan to
design and build applications securely via secure coding training,
security requirements and threat modeling and how security teams can help
evaluate the security of what development teams have produced via
automated scanning as well as manual testing. In addition, the
presentation discusses how both security and development teams can prepare
to respond to issues that will inevitably arise so that they can most
effectively diagnose and correct issues in a timely manner.
Running a Software Security Program with Open Source ToolsDenim Group
Using the Software Assurance Maturity Model (OpenSAMM) as a framework, this course walks through the major components of a comprehensive software security program and highlights open source and other freely available tools that can be used to help implement the activities involved in such a program.
The focus of the course is on providing hands-on demonstrations of the tools with an emphasis on integrating tool results into the overall software security program. Attendees should finish the course with a solid understanding of the various components of a comprehensive software security program as well as hands-on exposure to a variety of freely-available tools that they can use to implement portions of these programs.
Running a Software Security Program with Open Source Tools (Course)Denim Group
Using the Software Assurance Maturity Model (OpenSAMM) as a framework, this course walks through the major components of a comprehensive software security program and highlights open source and other freely-available tools that can be used to help implement the activities involved in such a program. The focus of the course is on providing hands-on demonstrations of the tools with an emphasis on integrating tool results into the overall software security program. Featured tools include: ESAPI, Microsoft Web Protection Library, FindBugs, Brakeman, Agnitio, w3af, OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), gauntlt, and ThreadFix as well as other educational resources from OWASP. Attendees should finish the course with a solid understanding of the various components of a comprehensive software security program as well as hands-on experience with a variety of freely-available tools that they can use to implement portions of these programs.
Do You Have a Scanner or Do You Have a Scanning Program? (AppSecEU 2013)Denim Group
By this point, most organizations have acquired at least one code or application scanning technology to incorporate into their software security program. Unfortunately, for many organizations the scanner represents the entirety of that so-called “program” and often the scanners are not used correctly or on a consistent basis.
This presentation looks at the components of a comprehensive software security program, the role that automation plays in these programs and tools and techniques that can be used to help increase the value an organization receives from its application scanning activities. It starts by examining common traps organizations fall into where they fail to address coverage concerns – either breadth of scanning coverage across the application portfolio or depth of coverage issues where application scans do not provide sufficient insight into the security state of target applications. After discussing approaches to address these coverage issues, the presentation walks through metrics organizations can use to keep tabs on their scanning progress to better understand what is being scanned, how frequently and at what depth.
The presentation also contains a demonstration of how freely available tools such as the open source ThreadFix application vulnerability management platform and the OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) scanner can be combined to create a baseline scanning program for an organization and how this approach can be generalized to use any scanning technology.
SecDevOps: Development Tools for Security ProsDenim Group
Security teams deal in penetration tests and vulnerabilities, and development teams deal in software defects, scrums and sprints. For the security professional, a failure to understand the way that development teams work and the tools that they use means that security vulnerabilities they identify will be hard to get remediated. This becomes an even greater issue as organizations try to roll out DevOps practices to gain greater efficiencies and responsiveness. This presentation walks through the tools and processes that development teams use to manage their workload, accomplish their goals, and track their success and lays out ways that security teams can better interface with developers to more successfully influence their priorities. The major tools discussed include defect trackers, integrated development environments (IDEs), continuous integration (CI) systems and metric tracking and demonstrations are given using open source examples of each. The presentation concludes with examples of healthy interaction patterns for security and development teams as well as interactions that lead to less healthy and less productive relationships.
Mobile Application Assessment By the Numbers: a Whole-istic ViewDenim Group
Typically, mobile application assessments myopically test only the software living on the device. However, the code deployed on the device, the corporate web services backing the device and any third party supporting services must be “whole-isticly” tested AS WELL AS testing the interactions between these components to reach an acceptable level of software assurance for mobile applications.
ThreadFix 2.2 Preview Webinar with Dan CornellDenim Group
ThreadFix allows security analysts to create a consolidated view of applications and vulnerabilities, prioritize application risk decisions based on data, and translate application vulnerabilities to developers in the tools they are already using. This webinar examines how organizations can use ThreadFix 2.2 to help establish and scale their application security programs. Using a combination of demos and real-world examples, attendees will learn how to best use ThreadFix's capabilities to support their application security program.
Topics will include:
Consolidating application vulnerability data by integrating SAST, DAST and now IAST and component lifecycle management results into a single dashboard
Managing application risk with ThreadFix’s completely overhauled vulnerability analytics and reporting as well as GRC integration capabilities
Ramping up application penetration testing with the updated ThreadFix ZAP and Burp plugins, featuring integrated Hybrid Analysis Mapping
Communicating security risks to development managers via SonarQube integration
Building Your Application Security Data Hub - OWASP AppSecUSADenim Group
One of the reasons application security is so challenging to address is that it spans multiple teams within an organization. Development teams build software, security testing teams find vulnerabilities, security operations staff manage applications in production and IT audit organizations make sure that the resulting software meets compliance and governance requirements. In addition, each team has a different toolbox they use to meet their goals, ranging from scanning tools, defect trackers, Integrated Development Environments (IDEs), WAFs and GRC systems. Unfortunately, in most organizations the interactions between these teams is often strained and the flow of data between these disparate tools and systems is non-existent or tediously implemented manually.
In today’s presentation, we will demonstrate how leading organizations are breaking down these barriers between teams and better integrating their disparate tools to enable the flow of application security data between silos to accelerate and simplify their remediation efforts. At the same time, we will show how to collect the proper data to measure the performance and illustrate the improvement of the software security program. The challenges that need to be overcome to enable teams and tools to work seamlessly with one another will be enumerated individually. Team and tool interaction patterns will also be outlined that reduce the friction that will arise while addressing application security risks. Using open source products such as OWASP ZAP, ThreadFix, Bugzilla and Eclipse, a significant amount of time will also be spent demonstrating the kinds of interactions that need to be enabled between tools. This will provide attendees with practical examples on how to replicate a powerful, integrated Application Security program within their own organizations. In addition, how to gather program-wide metrics and regularly calculate measurements such as mean-time-to-fix will also be demonstrated to enable attendees to monitor and ensure the continuing health and performance of their Application Security program.
Managing Your Application Security Program with the ThreadFix EcosystemDenim Group
ThreadFix is an open source application vulnerability management system that helps automate many common application security tasks and integrate security and development tools. This tutorial will walk through the capabilities of the ecosystem of ThreadFix applications, showing how ThreadFix can be used to:
•Manage a risk-ranked application portfolio
•Consolidate, normalize and de-duplicate the results of DAST, SAST and other application security testing activities and track these results over time to produce trending and mean-time-to-fix reporting
•Convert application vulnerabilities into software defects in developer issue tracking systems
•Pre-seed DAST scanners such as OWASP ZAP with application attack surface data to allow for better scan coverage
•Instrument developer Continuous Integration (CI) systems such as Jenkins to automatically collect security test data
•Map the results of DAST and SAST scanning into developer IDEs
The presentation walks through these scenarios and demonstrates how ThreadFix, along with other open source tools, can be used to address common problems faced by teams implementing software security programs. It will also provide insight into the ThreadFix development roadmap and upcoming enhancements.
Running a Software Security Program with Open Source ToolsDenim Group
Using the Software Assurance Maturity Model (OpenSAMM) as a framework, this course walks through the major components of a comprehensive software security program and highlights open source and other freely available tools that can be used to help implement the activities involved in such a program.
The focus of the course is on providing hands-on demonstrations of the tools with an emphasis on integrating tool results into the overall software security program. Attendees should finish the course with a solid understanding of the various components of a comprehensive software security program as well as hands-on exposure to a variety of freely-available tools that they can use to implement portions of these programs.
Running a Software Security Program with Open Source Tools (Course)Denim Group
Using the Software Assurance Maturity Model (OpenSAMM) as a framework, this course walks through the major components of a comprehensive software security program and highlights open source and other freely-available tools that can be used to help implement the activities involved in such a program. The focus of the course is on providing hands-on demonstrations of the tools with an emphasis on integrating tool results into the overall software security program. Featured tools include: ESAPI, Microsoft Web Protection Library, FindBugs, Brakeman, Agnitio, w3af, OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), gauntlt, and ThreadFix as well as other educational resources from OWASP. Attendees should finish the course with a solid understanding of the various components of a comprehensive software security program as well as hands-on experience with a variety of freely-available tools that they can use to implement portions of these programs.
Do You Have a Scanner or Do You Have a Scanning Program? (AppSecEU 2013)Denim Group
By this point, most organizations have acquired at least one code or application scanning technology to incorporate into their software security program. Unfortunately, for many organizations the scanner represents the entirety of that so-called “program” and often the scanners are not used correctly or on a consistent basis.
This presentation looks at the components of a comprehensive software security program, the role that automation plays in these programs and tools and techniques that can be used to help increase the value an organization receives from its application scanning activities. It starts by examining common traps organizations fall into where they fail to address coverage concerns – either breadth of scanning coverage across the application portfolio or depth of coverage issues where application scans do not provide sufficient insight into the security state of target applications. After discussing approaches to address these coverage issues, the presentation walks through metrics organizations can use to keep tabs on their scanning progress to better understand what is being scanned, how frequently and at what depth.
The presentation also contains a demonstration of how freely available tools such as the open source ThreadFix application vulnerability management platform and the OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) scanner can be combined to create a baseline scanning program for an organization and how this approach can be generalized to use any scanning technology.
SecDevOps: Development Tools for Security ProsDenim Group
Security teams deal in penetration tests and vulnerabilities, and development teams deal in software defects, scrums and sprints. For the security professional, a failure to understand the way that development teams work and the tools that they use means that security vulnerabilities they identify will be hard to get remediated. This becomes an even greater issue as organizations try to roll out DevOps practices to gain greater efficiencies and responsiveness. This presentation walks through the tools and processes that development teams use to manage their workload, accomplish their goals, and track their success and lays out ways that security teams can better interface with developers to more successfully influence their priorities. The major tools discussed include defect trackers, integrated development environments (IDEs), continuous integration (CI) systems and metric tracking and demonstrations are given using open source examples of each. The presentation concludes with examples of healthy interaction patterns for security and development teams as well as interactions that lead to less healthy and less productive relationships.
Mobile Application Assessment By the Numbers: a Whole-istic ViewDenim Group
Typically, mobile application assessments myopically test only the software living on the device. However, the code deployed on the device, the corporate web services backing the device and any third party supporting services must be “whole-isticly” tested AS WELL AS testing the interactions between these components to reach an acceptable level of software assurance for mobile applications.
ThreadFix 2.2 Preview Webinar with Dan CornellDenim Group
ThreadFix allows security analysts to create a consolidated view of applications and vulnerabilities, prioritize application risk decisions based on data, and translate application vulnerabilities to developers in the tools they are already using. This webinar examines how organizations can use ThreadFix 2.2 to help establish and scale their application security programs. Using a combination of demos and real-world examples, attendees will learn how to best use ThreadFix's capabilities to support their application security program.
Topics will include:
Consolidating application vulnerability data by integrating SAST, DAST and now IAST and component lifecycle management results into a single dashboard
Managing application risk with ThreadFix’s completely overhauled vulnerability analytics and reporting as well as GRC integration capabilities
Ramping up application penetration testing with the updated ThreadFix ZAP and Burp plugins, featuring integrated Hybrid Analysis Mapping
Communicating security risks to development managers via SonarQube integration
Building Your Application Security Data Hub - OWASP AppSecUSADenim Group
One of the reasons application security is so challenging to address is that it spans multiple teams within an organization. Development teams build software, security testing teams find vulnerabilities, security operations staff manage applications in production and IT audit organizations make sure that the resulting software meets compliance and governance requirements. In addition, each team has a different toolbox they use to meet their goals, ranging from scanning tools, defect trackers, Integrated Development Environments (IDEs), WAFs and GRC systems. Unfortunately, in most organizations the interactions between these teams is often strained and the flow of data between these disparate tools and systems is non-existent or tediously implemented manually.
In today’s presentation, we will demonstrate how leading organizations are breaking down these barriers between teams and better integrating their disparate tools to enable the flow of application security data between silos to accelerate and simplify their remediation efforts. At the same time, we will show how to collect the proper data to measure the performance and illustrate the improvement of the software security program. The challenges that need to be overcome to enable teams and tools to work seamlessly with one another will be enumerated individually. Team and tool interaction patterns will also be outlined that reduce the friction that will arise while addressing application security risks. Using open source products such as OWASP ZAP, ThreadFix, Bugzilla and Eclipse, a significant amount of time will also be spent demonstrating the kinds of interactions that need to be enabled between tools. This will provide attendees with practical examples on how to replicate a powerful, integrated Application Security program within their own organizations. In addition, how to gather program-wide metrics and regularly calculate measurements such as mean-time-to-fix will also be demonstrated to enable attendees to monitor and ensure the continuing health and performance of their Application Security program.
Managing Your Application Security Program with the ThreadFix EcosystemDenim Group
ThreadFix is an open source application vulnerability management system that helps automate many common application security tasks and integrate security and development tools. This tutorial will walk through the capabilities of the ecosystem of ThreadFix applications, showing how ThreadFix can be used to:
•Manage a risk-ranked application portfolio
•Consolidate, normalize and de-duplicate the results of DAST, SAST and other application security testing activities and track these results over time to produce trending and mean-time-to-fix reporting
•Convert application vulnerabilities into software defects in developer issue tracking systems
•Pre-seed DAST scanners such as OWASP ZAP with application attack surface data to allow for better scan coverage
•Instrument developer Continuous Integration (CI) systems such as Jenkins to automatically collect security test data
•Map the results of DAST and SAST scanning into developer IDEs
The presentation walks through these scenarios and demonstrates how ThreadFix, along with other open source tools, can be used to address common problems faced by teams implementing software security programs. It will also provide insight into the ThreadFix development roadmap and upcoming enhancements.
ThreadFix 2.1 and Your Application Security ProgramDenim Group
ThreadFix allows security analysts to create a consolidated view of applications and vulnerabilities, prioritize application risk decisions based on data, and translate application vulnerabilities to developers in the tools they are already using.
This webinar examines how organizations can use ThreadFix 2.1 to help establish and scale their application security programs. Using a combination of demos and real-world examples, attendees will learn how to best use ThreadFix's capabilities to support their application security program.
See more at:
http://www.denimgroup.com/blog/denim_group/2014/12/threadfix-webinar-recording.html
http://threadfix.org
AppSec Survey 2.0 Fine-Tuning an AppSec Training Program Based on DataDenim Group
Measuring the effectiveness of any security activity is widely discussed – security leaders debate the topic with a religious fervor rivaling that of any other hot button issue. Virtually every organization has some sort of application security training effort, but data on training effectiveness remains scarce. Last year our research team delivered the first-ever survey that captured developer awareness of secure coding concepts and the impact of formal application security training on a developer’s ability to write secure code. We learned that most software developer were aware of certain application security concepts, yet when asked how to write more secure code, they faired poorly.
This year’s 600-developer survey provides more quantitative data on what software developers understand about application security, both concepts and practices. It dives most deeply into awareness of defensive coding practices, which most developers largely did not grasp in the 2013 survey. It also is separates respondents by roles, so we can better understand how architects, developers, and QA staff grasp key application security concepts and put them to work. It better captures how software developers learn in general, so one can tailor any security training effort to how software developers, in practice, actually learn. This information will provide data to application security managers responsible for corporate security training that should allow them them to make more fact-based decisions about security training.
The Self Healing Cloud: Protecting Applications and Infrastructure with Autom...Denim Group
Organizations often have to deploy arbitrary applications on their infrastructure without thorough security testing. These applications can contain serious security vulnerabilities that can be detected and exploited remotely and in an automated manner. The applications themselves and the infrastructure they are deployed on are then at risk of exploitation. Configuration changes or vendor-provided software updates and patches are typically used to address infrastructure vulnerabilities. However, application-level vulnerabilities often require coding changes to be fully addressed.
Virtual patching is a technique where targeted rules are created for web application firewalls (WAFs) or other IDS/IPS technologies to help mitigate specific known application vulnerabilities. This allows applications to be “virtually” patched prior to actual code-level patches being applied. These virtual patches are most often applicable to vulnerabilities that have a strong detection signature such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting (XSS) because the detection rules can be targeted to detect these signatures, but limited only to specific parts of the application attack surface where the application is known to be vulnerable.
This presentation examines the automatic creation of virtual patches from automated web application security scanner results and explores scenarios where this approach might be successfully employed. It discusses theoretical approaches to the problem and provides specific demonstrations using Open Source tools such as the skipfish and w3af scanners and Snort and mod_security protection technologies. Finally, it looks at opportunities to apply these techniques to protect arbitrary applications deployed into arbitrary infrastructures so that short-term protection against common web application attacks can be consistently applied while minimizing false blocking of legitimate traffic.
Mobile Application Assessment - Don't Cheat YourselfDenim Group
See the video - http://youtu.be/V5a6DkSZn8E
Too often, organizations looking to address mobile application security risks cheat themselves by myopically scanning only the software living on the device. Unfortunately, this ignores the fact that security issues can exist in code deployed on the device, in corporate web services backing the device, in any third party supporting services as well as in the interactions between any of these components.
By analyzing the data from a large body of mobile application security assessments, this webinar characterizes the most common and most damaging mobile application security vulnerabilities as well as where these vulnerabilities are found and the testing activities that identified them.
Attendees will walk away with a better understanding of the scope of potential mobile application security issues as well as statistics to help them better craft mobile application security programs.
Security Training: Necessary Evil, Waste of Time, or Genius Move?Denim Group
Most application risk managers agree that training software developers to understand security concepts can be an important part of any software security program. Couple that with the Payment Card Industry, who mandate that developers should have training in secure coding techniques as laid out in their Data Security Standard. Yet others call developer training "compliance-ware," a necessary evil and a tax on software development in the enterprise.
This presentation shares the results of a yearlong survey of nearly 1,000 software developers that captures their knowledge of application security before and after formal training. The survey queries developers from various backgrounds and industries, to better understand their exposure to secure development concepts and to capture a baseline for post-training improvements. The session also includes the results of a "retest" of a subset of respondents, to identify how much security knowledge they retained after a specific length of time. The results were surprising, and include information every application risk manager should know, particularly those who rely on training as part of an application security strategy.
Hybrid Analysis Mapping: Making Security and Development Tools Play Nice Toge...Denim Group
Developers want to write code and security testers want to break it and both groups have specialized tools supporting these goals. The problem is – security testers need to know more about application code to do better testing and developers need to be able to quickly address problems found by security testers. This presentation looks at both groups and their respective toolsets and explores ways they can help each other out.
Two different interactions are examined:
• How can knowledge of code make application scanning better?
• How can application scan results be mapped back to specific lines of code?
Using open source examples built on OWASP ZAP, ThreadFix and Eclipse, the presentation walks through the process of seeding web applications scans with knowledge gleaned from code analysis as well as the mapping of dynamic scan results to specific line of code. The end result is a combination of testing and remediation workflows that help both security testers and software developers be more effective. Particular attention is give to Java/JSP applications and Java/Spring applications and how teams using these frameworks can best benefit from these interactions.
This webinar looks at the new features included in the upcoming 2.3 release of ThreadFix that help organizations secure their DevOps initiatives. These include greatly expanded Scan Orchestration capabilities to support ThreadFix's use in Continuous Integration/Continuous Development (CI/CD) environments as well as tighter integrations with developer tools to reduce the effort and time required for vulnerability remediation. We will also highlight generous contributions from the ThreadFix community from organizations such as Pearson and Samsung.
Building an AppSec Pipeline: Keeping your program, and your life, saneweaveraaaron
Are you currently running at AppSec program? AppSec programs fall into a odd middle ground; highly technical interactions with the dev and ops teams yet a practical business focus is required as you go up the org chart. How can you keep your far too small team efficient while making sure you meet the needs of the business all while making sure you’re catching vulnerabilities as early and often as possible?
The AppSec team and the business created an AppSec Pipeline to handle the work flow. The pipeline starts with “Bag of Holding”, an open source web application which helps automate and streamline the activities of your AppSec team. At the end of the pipeline is ThreadFix to manage all the findings from all the sources. Finally we incorporated a chatbot to tie all the information into one place.
ThreadFix 2.4: Maximizing the Impact of Your Application Security ResourcesDenim Group
Join us for a webinar to learn more about the capabilities available in the upcoming ThreadFix 2.4 release. See how teams are using ThreadFix to get more application testing done with fewer resources, secure their CI/CD pipelines and fix vulnerabilities faster.
Using ThreadFix to Manage Application VulnerabilitiesDenim Group
ThreadFix is an open source software vulnerability aggregation and management system that reduces the time it takes to fix software vulnerabilities. It imports the results from dynamic, static and manual testing to provide a centralized view of software security defects across development teams and applications. The system allows organizations to correlate testing results and streamline software remediation efforts by simplifying feeds to software issue trackers. This presentation will walk through the major functionality in ThreadFix and describe several common use cases such as merging the results of multiple open source and commercial scanning tools and services. It will also demonstrate how ThreadFix can be used to track the results of scanning over time and gauge the effectiveness of different scanning techniques and technologies. Finally it will provide examples of how tracking assurance activities across an organization’s application portfolio can help the organization optimize remediation activities to best address risks associated with vulnerable software.
Throw out everything that you know about security tools today. No more six-figure appliances that only do one thing marginally well. No more proprietary protocols. We deserve better and we demand better. Envision a world where your security tools talk with eachother. They communicate and share data in order to leverage eachothers strengths and and help compensate for their weaknesses. They work together to solve problems. Envision "Symbiotic Security".
Symbiotic Security is a new term that was coined to describe the ability of a tool to consume data from other tools or provide data to other tools. As part of our research, we have examined various classes of tools on the market and identified these abilities in each of them resulting in a label of "Consumer", "Provider", or "Symbiotic". As a consumer of security tools, this completely revolutionizes the way that we make purchases.
As an example, let's pretend that you are purchasing a new Intrusion Prevention System for your enterprise. As you begin to evaluate the various tools from the Gartner Magic Quadrant, you quickly realize that they almost all have the same primary feature set. The key differentiator at this point aren't the rules or the hardware, but rather, the ability for the system to send and receive data with other systems. The IPS itself has some signatures and blocking abilities, but has zero relevancy data. Now, we give the IPS the ability to pull in vulnerability data and system configuration information from network and host scans and we gain relevancy. Add in some additional data on where the potential threat is coming from and now you have the data necessary to take a decisive action on threats. This new system is a "Consumer". Now, if you give the IPS the ability to send information to other devices on things like the source of relevant threats, those devices, like a firewall or HIPS, can now make intelligent blocking decisions as well. Our IPS now has "Provider" abilities. Since our IPS is labeled as both a "Provider" and "Consumer" it is deemed "Symbiotic". This convention can now be used both by the manufacturer to market the value-add of the device as well as a way for the purchasers to differentiate between otherwise similar devices.
In order to demonstrate the true powers of being symbiotic, we are releasing a free tool that epitomizes this concept. The tool, named ThreadFix, has been labeled as a "Consumer" because of it's abilities to pull vulnerability data from static and dynamic scanning tools, threat modeling, and manual penetration tests as well as alert logs and vulnerability details from IDS, IPS, and WAF products. ThreadFix has also been labeled as a "Provider" because of it's abilities to normalize the data consumed and pass it along to IDS, IPS, and WAF for action as well as to your bug tracking system for remediation tracking. Because it can serve both a consumer and provider role, we designate it as a "Symbiotic" tool.
Benchmarking Web Application Scanners for YOUR OrganizationDenim Group
Web applications pose significant risks for organizations. The selection of an appropriate scanning product or service can be challenging because every organization develops their web applications differently and decisions made by developers can cause wide swings in the value of different scanning technologies. To make a solid, informed decision, organizations need to create development team- and organization-specific benchmarks for the effectiveness of potential scanning technologies. This involves creating a comprehensive model of false positives, false negatives and other factors prior to mandating analysis technologies and making decisions about application risk management. This presentation provides a model for evaluating application analysis technologies, introduces an open source tool for benchmarking and comparing tool effectiveness, and outlines a process for making organization-specific decisions about analysis technology selection.
Application Security Assessments by the Numbers - A Whole-istic View - OWASP ...Denim Group
By analyzing the data from over 60 mobile application security assessments, we identify the typical types of mobile vulnerabilities, the system components that contain those vulnerabilities, the components where given types of vulnerabilities cluster, and how to test for each of these.
Attendees will learn in the session how to identify these vulnerabilities, how to create and implement an effective mobile security plan, and where to focus their limited testing resources to minimize mobile application portfolio risks. This is critical because automated web application testing tools are able to easily find vulnerabilities while today's mobile security industry does not offer automated testing tools that can effectively test web services (i.e. the interaction between mobile clients and back-end services.) As a result, best practices for mobile application testing must incorporate significant, often laborious, manual testing. At this point in the presentation, we will use the statistics from the research to define the appropriate manual testing that needs to be implemented.
How-To-Guide for Software Security Vulnerability RemediationDenim Group
The security industry often pays a tremendous amount of attention to finding security vulnerabilities. This is done via code review, penetration testing and other assessment methods. Unfortunately, finding vulnerabilities is only the first step toward actually addressing the associated risks, and addressing these risks is arguably the most critical step in the vulnerability management process. Complicating matters is the fact that most application security vulnerabilities cannot be fixed by members of the security team but require code-level changes in order to successfully address the underlying issue. Therefore, security vulnerabilities need to be communicated and transferred to software development teams and then prioritized and added to their workloads. This paper ex- amines steps required to remediate software-level vulnerabilities properly, and recommends best practices organizations can use to be successful in their remediation efforts.
DevOps puts an intense focus on automation – taking humans out of the loop whenever possible to allow frequent, incremental updates to production systems. However, thorough application testing often has multiple components – much of this can be automated, but manual testing is also required. This is inconvenient and not “DevOps-y,” but is unfortunately an unavoidable requirement in the real world. In addition, managing these multiple sources of application vulnerability intelligence often requires manual interaction – to clear false positives, de-duplicate repeated results, and make decisions about triage and remediation.
Axway has rolled out an application security program that incorporates automated static and dynamic testing, attack surface analysis, component analysis, as well as inputs from 3rd parties including manual penetration testing, automated and manual dynamic testing, automated and manual static testing, and test results from vendors providing test data on their products. Automation has allowed Axway to increase the frequency of web application testing, thus reducing the cycle time in the application vulnerability “OODA loop.” Moving beyond the identification of vulnerabilities, Axway has deployed ThreadFix to automatically aggregate the results of the automated testing and de-duplicate findings. 3rd party penetration testers are also finding vulnerabilities and reporting them in reasonably structured CSV files requiring Axway to convert this manual test data and incorporate it into the aggregated vulnerability model in ThreadFix. Centralizing this pipeline allows for metric tracking – both for the application security program as a whole as well as on a per-vulnerability-source basis. This automation and consolidation now covers 50% of Axway’s application vulnerability review process - with plans to extend further.
This presentation walks through Axway’s construction of their application security-testing pipeline and the decisions they were forced to make along the way to best maximize the use of automation while accommodating the reality of manual testing requirements. It then looks at how this testing regimen and the associated automation have allowed them to impact deployment practices as well as collect metrics on their assurance program. Finally, it looks at lessons learned along the way – the good and the bad – and identifies targeted next steps Axway plans to take to increase the depth and frequency of application security testing while dealing with the deployment realities placed on them to remain agile and responsive to business requirements.
Monitoring Attack Surface to Secure DevOps PipelinesDenim Group
A web application’s attack surface is the combination of URLs it will respond to as well as the inputs to those URLs that can change the behavior of the application. Understanding an application’s attack surface is critical to being able to provide sufficient security test coverage, and by watching an application’s attack surface change over time security and development teams can help target and optimize testing activities. This presentation looks at methods of calculating web application attack surface and tracking the evolution of attack surface over time. In addition, it looks at metrics and thresholds that can be used to craft policies for integrating different testing activities into Continuous Integration / Continuous Delivery (CI/CD) pipelines for teams integrating security into their DevOps practices.
The ThreadFix Ecosystem: Vendors, Volunteers, and VersionsDenim Group
ThreadFix is an open source application vulnerability management system that helps automate many common application security tasks and integrate security and development tools. This presentation looks at the components of the platform and how they work together to help developers and application security analysts build more secure software. In addition to being a platform, ThreadFix is also an ecosystem of users and volunteers and the presentation will look at several case studies of how these groups have worked together to extend and improve the ThreadFix platform.
Title:
AppSec Fast and Slow: Your DevSecOps CI/CD Pipeline Isn’t an SSA Program
Abstract:
With all the focus on DevSecOps and integrating security into Continuous Integration/Continuous Delivery (CI/CD) pipelines, some teams may be lured into thinking that the entirety of a Software Security Assurance (SSA) program can be baked into these pipelines. While integrating security into CI/CD offers many benefits, it is critical to understand that a full SSA program encompasses a variety of activities – many of which are incompatible with run time restrictions and other constraints imposed by these pipelines. This webinar looks at the breadth of activities involved in a mature SSA program and steps through the aspects of a program that can be realistically included in a pipeline, as well as those that cannot. It also reviews how these activities and related tooling have evolved over time as the application security discipline has matured and as development teams started to focus on cloud-native development techniques and technologies.
Speaker:
Dan Cornell
Bio:
A globally recognized application security expert, Dan Cornell holds over 15 years of experience architecting, developing and securing web-based software systems. As Chief Technology Officer and Principal at Denim Group, Ltd., he leads the technology team to help Fortune 500 companies and government organizations integrate security throughout the development process.
Security Champions: Pushing Security Expertise to the Edges of Your OrganizationDenim Group
Application security teams are outnumbered. Even in security-conscious environments, application developers often exceed application security professionals by a ratio of 100:1. In addition, the push for digital transformation is accelerating the pace of development – exacerbating these challenges. One technique forward-looking security teams have adopted to stay afloat is to deploy security champions into development teams throughout the organization. This webinar looks at different models for standing up security champion initiatives and relates Denim Group’s experiences helping organizations craft and staff these programs.
Grab the Secure Mobile Application Development Reference here - http://www.denimgroup.com/know_artic_secure_mobile_application_development_reference.html
Are you looking to build a program to ensure maximum mobile security coverage?
If you are tasked with putting together a security testing program to address risk with internally developed mobile applications, there is no shortage of technical and process factors to consider. It is also critical to balance the security with a positive end-user experience, helping propel the overall brand forward - safely. Without proper mobile security, one significant loss can quickly destroy the trust foundation your company has worked years to craft.
This webinar will provide the security leader an overview of the challenges associated with mobile testing, certain technologies that one can use to identify mobile application vulnerabilities, and repeatable process strategies that will help build the foundation for a recurring testing program.
The session will provide attendees a broad understanding of mobile technologies, as well as a mobile testing launch checklist that will help your organization go from ground floor to a fully-functioning testing program in 30 days.
The session will also include:
An overview of the major mobile technologies and their defining attributes
An overview of how iOS and Android handle certain security issues differently via the Denim Group Mobile Development Reference Guide
An overview of a typical mobile application architecture and how it differs from a web application environment
How important web services are to a typical mobile architecture
The limitations of automated testing and how to augment security reviews to overcome testing gaps
How to make a program repeatable and economically feasible without disrupting the software development process
Many organizations have only a passing understanding of the scope of their application portfolios and how these assets are exposed to the Internet and other potentially dangerous networks. This puts them in a risky situation where they have attack surface that is unknown and unmanaged, often resulting in serious vulnerabilities being exposed indefinitely. This presentation looks at several tools and methods that can be used to enumerate enterprise application assets – including web applications, mobile applications, and web services. The discussion covers several open source application asset identification tools and compares their effectiveness. Finally, a framework for ongoing application asset discovery and enumeration is presented so that security managers can embark on a structured program to characterize their risk exposure due to their enterprise attack surface.
Many organizations have only a passing understanding of the scope of their application portfolios and how these assets are exposed to the Internet and other potentially dangerous networks. This puts them in a risky situation where they have an attack surface that is unknown and unmanaged, often resulting in serious vulnerabilities being exposed indefinitely. This presentation looks at several tools and methods that can be used to enumerate enterprise application assets – including web applications, mobile applications, and web services. The discussion covers several open source application asset identification tools and compares their effectiveness. Finally, a framework for ongoing application asset discovery and enumeration is presented so that security managers can embark on a structured program to characterize their risk exposure due to their enterprise attack surface.
ThreadFix 2.1 and Your Application Security ProgramDenim Group
ThreadFix allows security analysts to create a consolidated view of applications and vulnerabilities, prioritize application risk decisions based on data, and translate application vulnerabilities to developers in the tools they are already using.
This webinar examines how organizations can use ThreadFix 2.1 to help establish and scale their application security programs. Using a combination of demos and real-world examples, attendees will learn how to best use ThreadFix's capabilities to support their application security program.
See more at:
http://www.denimgroup.com/blog/denim_group/2014/12/threadfix-webinar-recording.html
http://threadfix.org
AppSec Survey 2.0 Fine-Tuning an AppSec Training Program Based on DataDenim Group
Measuring the effectiveness of any security activity is widely discussed – security leaders debate the topic with a religious fervor rivaling that of any other hot button issue. Virtually every organization has some sort of application security training effort, but data on training effectiveness remains scarce. Last year our research team delivered the first-ever survey that captured developer awareness of secure coding concepts and the impact of formal application security training on a developer’s ability to write secure code. We learned that most software developer were aware of certain application security concepts, yet when asked how to write more secure code, they faired poorly.
This year’s 600-developer survey provides more quantitative data on what software developers understand about application security, both concepts and practices. It dives most deeply into awareness of defensive coding practices, which most developers largely did not grasp in the 2013 survey. It also is separates respondents by roles, so we can better understand how architects, developers, and QA staff grasp key application security concepts and put them to work. It better captures how software developers learn in general, so one can tailor any security training effort to how software developers, in practice, actually learn. This information will provide data to application security managers responsible for corporate security training that should allow them them to make more fact-based decisions about security training.
The Self Healing Cloud: Protecting Applications and Infrastructure with Autom...Denim Group
Organizations often have to deploy arbitrary applications on their infrastructure without thorough security testing. These applications can contain serious security vulnerabilities that can be detected and exploited remotely and in an automated manner. The applications themselves and the infrastructure they are deployed on are then at risk of exploitation. Configuration changes or vendor-provided software updates and patches are typically used to address infrastructure vulnerabilities. However, application-level vulnerabilities often require coding changes to be fully addressed.
Virtual patching is a technique where targeted rules are created for web application firewalls (WAFs) or other IDS/IPS technologies to help mitigate specific known application vulnerabilities. This allows applications to be “virtually” patched prior to actual code-level patches being applied. These virtual patches are most often applicable to vulnerabilities that have a strong detection signature such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting (XSS) because the detection rules can be targeted to detect these signatures, but limited only to specific parts of the application attack surface where the application is known to be vulnerable.
This presentation examines the automatic creation of virtual patches from automated web application security scanner results and explores scenarios where this approach might be successfully employed. It discusses theoretical approaches to the problem and provides specific demonstrations using Open Source tools such as the skipfish and w3af scanners and Snort and mod_security protection technologies. Finally, it looks at opportunities to apply these techniques to protect arbitrary applications deployed into arbitrary infrastructures so that short-term protection against common web application attacks can be consistently applied while minimizing false blocking of legitimate traffic.
Mobile Application Assessment - Don't Cheat YourselfDenim Group
See the video - http://youtu.be/V5a6DkSZn8E
Too often, organizations looking to address mobile application security risks cheat themselves by myopically scanning only the software living on the device. Unfortunately, this ignores the fact that security issues can exist in code deployed on the device, in corporate web services backing the device, in any third party supporting services as well as in the interactions between any of these components.
By analyzing the data from a large body of mobile application security assessments, this webinar characterizes the most common and most damaging mobile application security vulnerabilities as well as where these vulnerabilities are found and the testing activities that identified them.
Attendees will walk away with a better understanding of the scope of potential mobile application security issues as well as statistics to help them better craft mobile application security programs.
Security Training: Necessary Evil, Waste of Time, or Genius Move?Denim Group
Most application risk managers agree that training software developers to understand security concepts can be an important part of any software security program. Couple that with the Payment Card Industry, who mandate that developers should have training in secure coding techniques as laid out in their Data Security Standard. Yet others call developer training "compliance-ware," a necessary evil and a tax on software development in the enterprise.
This presentation shares the results of a yearlong survey of nearly 1,000 software developers that captures their knowledge of application security before and after formal training. The survey queries developers from various backgrounds and industries, to better understand their exposure to secure development concepts and to capture a baseline for post-training improvements. The session also includes the results of a "retest" of a subset of respondents, to identify how much security knowledge they retained after a specific length of time. The results were surprising, and include information every application risk manager should know, particularly those who rely on training as part of an application security strategy.
Hybrid Analysis Mapping: Making Security and Development Tools Play Nice Toge...Denim Group
Developers want to write code and security testers want to break it and both groups have specialized tools supporting these goals. The problem is – security testers need to know more about application code to do better testing and developers need to be able to quickly address problems found by security testers. This presentation looks at both groups and their respective toolsets and explores ways they can help each other out.
Two different interactions are examined:
• How can knowledge of code make application scanning better?
• How can application scan results be mapped back to specific lines of code?
Using open source examples built on OWASP ZAP, ThreadFix and Eclipse, the presentation walks through the process of seeding web applications scans with knowledge gleaned from code analysis as well as the mapping of dynamic scan results to specific line of code. The end result is a combination of testing and remediation workflows that help both security testers and software developers be more effective. Particular attention is give to Java/JSP applications and Java/Spring applications and how teams using these frameworks can best benefit from these interactions.
This webinar looks at the new features included in the upcoming 2.3 release of ThreadFix that help organizations secure their DevOps initiatives. These include greatly expanded Scan Orchestration capabilities to support ThreadFix's use in Continuous Integration/Continuous Development (CI/CD) environments as well as tighter integrations with developer tools to reduce the effort and time required for vulnerability remediation. We will also highlight generous contributions from the ThreadFix community from organizations such as Pearson and Samsung.
Building an AppSec Pipeline: Keeping your program, and your life, saneweaveraaaron
Are you currently running at AppSec program? AppSec programs fall into a odd middle ground; highly technical interactions with the dev and ops teams yet a practical business focus is required as you go up the org chart. How can you keep your far too small team efficient while making sure you meet the needs of the business all while making sure you’re catching vulnerabilities as early and often as possible?
The AppSec team and the business created an AppSec Pipeline to handle the work flow. The pipeline starts with “Bag of Holding”, an open source web application which helps automate and streamline the activities of your AppSec team. At the end of the pipeline is ThreadFix to manage all the findings from all the sources. Finally we incorporated a chatbot to tie all the information into one place.
ThreadFix 2.4: Maximizing the Impact of Your Application Security ResourcesDenim Group
Join us for a webinar to learn more about the capabilities available in the upcoming ThreadFix 2.4 release. See how teams are using ThreadFix to get more application testing done with fewer resources, secure their CI/CD pipelines and fix vulnerabilities faster.
Using ThreadFix to Manage Application VulnerabilitiesDenim Group
ThreadFix is an open source software vulnerability aggregation and management system that reduces the time it takes to fix software vulnerabilities. It imports the results from dynamic, static and manual testing to provide a centralized view of software security defects across development teams and applications. The system allows organizations to correlate testing results and streamline software remediation efforts by simplifying feeds to software issue trackers. This presentation will walk through the major functionality in ThreadFix and describe several common use cases such as merging the results of multiple open source and commercial scanning tools and services. It will also demonstrate how ThreadFix can be used to track the results of scanning over time and gauge the effectiveness of different scanning techniques and technologies. Finally it will provide examples of how tracking assurance activities across an organization’s application portfolio can help the organization optimize remediation activities to best address risks associated with vulnerable software.
Throw out everything that you know about security tools today. No more six-figure appliances that only do one thing marginally well. No more proprietary protocols. We deserve better and we demand better. Envision a world where your security tools talk with eachother. They communicate and share data in order to leverage eachothers strengths and and help compensate for their weaknesses. They work together to solve problems. Envision "Symbiotic Security".
Symbiotic Security is a new term that was coined to describe the ability of a tool to consume data from other tools or provide data to other tools. As part of our research, we have examined various classes of tools on the market and identified these abilities in each of them resulting in a label of "Consumer", "Provider", or "Symbiotic". As a consumer of security tools, this completely revolutionizes the way that we make purchases.
As an example, let's pretend that you are purchasing a new Intrusion Prevention System for your enterprise. As you begin to evaluate the various tools from the Gartner Magic Quadrant, you quickly realize that they almost all have the same primary feature set. The key differentiator at this point aren't the rules or the hardware, but rather, the ability for the system to send and receive data with other systems. The IPS itself has some signatures and blocking abilities, but has zero relevancy data. Now, we give the IPS the ability to pull in vulnerability data and system configuration information from network and host scans and we gain relevancy. Add in some additional data on where the potential threat is coming from and now you have the data necessary to take a decisive action on threats. This new system is a "Consumer". Now, if you give the IPS the ability to send information to other devices on things like the source of relevant threats, those devices, like a firewall or HIPS, can now make intelligent blocking decisions as well. Our IPS now has "Provider" abilities. Since our IPS is labeled as both a "Provider" and "Consumer" it is deemed "Symbiotic". This convention can now be used both by the manufacturer to market the value-add of the device as well as a way for the purchasers to differentiate between otherwise similar devices.
In order to demonstrate the true powers of being symbiotic, we are releasing a free tool that epitomizes this concept. The tool, named ThreadFix, has been labeled as a "Consumer" because of it's abilities to pull vulnerability data from static and dynamic scanning tools, threat modeling, and manual penetration tests as well as alert logs and vulnerability details from IDS, IPS, and WAF products. ThreadFix has also been labeled as a "Provider" because of it's abilities to normalize the data consumed and pass it along to IDS, IPS, and WAF for action as well as to your bug tracking system for remediation tracking. Because it can serve both a consumer and provider role, we designate it as a "Symbiotic" tool.
Benchmarking Web Application Scanners for YOUR OrganizationDenim Group
Web applications pose significant risks for organizations. The selection of an appropriate scanning product or service can be challenging because every organization develops their web applications differently and decisions made by developers can cause wide swings in the value of different scanning technologies. To make a solid, informed decision, organizations need to create development team- and organization-specific benchmarks for the effectiveness of potential scanning technologies. This involves creating a comprehensive model of false positives, false negatives and other factors prior to mandating analysis technologies and making decisions about application risk management. This presentation provides a model for evaluating application analysis technologies, introduces an open source tool for benchmarking and comparing tool effectiveness, and outlines a process for making organization-specific decisions about analysis technology selection.
Application Security Assessments by the Numbers - A Whole-istic View - OWASP ...Denim Group
By analyzing the data from over 60 mobile application security assessments, we identify the typical types of mobile vulnerabilities, the system components that contain those vulnerabilities, the components where given types of vulnerabilities cluster, and how to test for each of these.
Attendees will learn in the session how to identify these vulnerabilities, how to create and implement an effective mobile security plan, and where to focus their limited testing resources to minimize mobile application portfolio risks. This is critical because automated web application testing tools are able to easily find vulnerabilities while today's mobile security industry does not offer automated testing tools that can effectively test web services (i.e. the interaction between mobile clients and back-end services.) As a result, best practices for mobile application testing must incorporate significant, often laborious, manual testing. At this point in the presentation, we will use the statistics from the research to define the appropriate manual testing that needs to be implemented.
How-To-Guide for Software Security Vulnerability RemediationDenim Group
The security industry often pays a tremendous amount of attention to finding security vulnerabilities. This is done via code review, penetration testing and other assessment methods. Unfortunately, finding vulnerabilities is only the first step toward actually addressing the associated risks, and addressing these risks is arguably the most critical step in the vulnerability management process. Complicating matters is the fact that most application security vulnerabilities cannot be fixed by members of the security team but require code-level changes in order to successfully address the underlying issue. Therefore, security vulnerabilities need to be communicated and transferred to software development teams and then prioritized and added to their workloads. This paper ex- amines steps required to remediate software-level vulnerabilities properly, and recommends best practices organizations can use to be successful in their remediation efforts.
DevOps puts an intense focus on automation – taking humans out of the loop whenever possible to allow frequent, incremental updates to production systems. However, thorough application testing often has multiple components – much of this can be automated, but manual testing is also required. This is inconvenient and not “DevOps-y,” but is unfortunately an unavoidable requirement in the real world. In addition, managing these multiple sources of application vulnerability intelligence often requires manual interaction – to clear false positives, de-duplicate repeated results, and make decisions about triage and remediation.
Axway has rolled out an application security program that incorporates automated static and dynamic testing, attack surface analysis, component analysis, as well as inputs from 3rd parties including manual penetration testing, automated and manual dynamic testing, automated and manual static testing, and test results from vendors providing test data on their products. Automation has allowed Axway to increase the frequency of web application testing, thus reducing the cycle time in the application vulnerability “OODA loop.” Moving beyond the identification of vulnerabilities, Axway has deployed ThreadFix to automatically aggregate the results of the automated testing and de-duplicate findings. 3rd party penetration testers are also finding vulnerabilities and reporting them in reasonably structured CSV files requiring Axway to convert this manual test data and incorporate it into the aggregated vulnerability model in ThreadFix. Centralizing this pipeline allows for metric tracking – both for the application security program as a whole as well as on a per-vulnerability-source basis. This automation and consolidation now covers 50% of Axway’s application vulnerability review process - with plans to extend further.
This presentation walks through Axway’s construction of their application security-testing pipeline and the decisions they were forced to make along the way to best maximize the use of automation while accommodating the reality of manual testing requirements. It then looks at how this testing regimen and the associated automation have allowed them to impact deployment practices as well as collect metrics on their assurance program. Finally, it looks at lessons learned along the way – the good and the bad – and identifies targeted next steps Axway plans to take to increase the depth and frequency of application security testing while dealing with the deployment realities placed on them to remain agile and responsive to business requirements.
Monitoring Attack Surface to Secure DevOps PipelinesDenim Group
A web application’s attack surface is the combination of URLs it will respond to as well as the inputs to those URLs that can change the behavior of the application. Understanding an application’s attack surface is critical to being able to provide sufficient security test coverage, and by watching an application’s attack surface change over time security and development teams can help target and optimize testing activities. This presentation looks at methods of calculating web application attack surface and tracking the evolution of attack surface over time. In addition, it looks at metrics and thresholds that can be used to craft policies for integrating different testing activities into Continuous Integration / Continuous Delivery (CI/CD) pipelines for teams integrating security into their DevOps practices.
The ThreadFix Ecosystem: Vendors, Volunteers, and VersionsDenim Group
ThreadFix is an open source application vulnerability management system that helps automate many common application security tasks and integrate security and development tools. This presentation looks at the components of the platform and how they work together to help developers and application security analysts build more secure software. In addition to being a platform, ThreadFix is also an ecosystem of users and volunteers and the presentation will look at several case studies of how these groups have worked together to extend and improve the ThreadFix platform.
Title:
AppSec Fast and Slow: Your DevSecOps CI/CD Pipeline Isn’t an SSA Program
Abstract:
With all the focus on DevSecOps and integrating security into Continuous Integration/Continuous Delivery (CI/CD) pipelines, some teams may be lured into thinking that the entirety of a Software Security Assurance (SSA) program can be baked into these pipelines. While integrating security into CI/CD offers many benefits, it is critical to understand that a full SSA program encompasses a variety of activities – many of which are incompatible with run time restrictions and other constraints imposed by these pipelines. This webinar looks at the breadth of activities involved in a mature SSA program and steps through the aspects of a program that can be realistically included in a pipeline, as well as those that cannot. It also reviews how these activities and related tooling have evolved over time as the application security discipline has matured and as development teams started to focus on cloud-native development techniques and technologies.
Speaker:
Dan Cornell
Bio:
A globally recognized application security expert, Dan Cornell holds over 15 years of experience architecting, developing and securing web-based software systems. As Chief Technology Officer and Principal at Denim Group, Ltd., he leads the technology team to help Fortune 500 companies and government organizations integrate security throughout the development process.
Security Champions: Pushing Security Expertise to the Edges of Your OrganizationDenim Group
Application security teams are outnumbered. Even in security-conscious environments, application developers often exceed application security professionals by a ratio of 100:1. In addition, the push for digital transformation is accelerating the pace of development – exacerbating these challenges. One technique forward-looking security teams have adopted to stay afloat is to deploy security champions into development teams throughout the organization. This webinar looks at different models for standing up security champion initiatives and relates Denim Group’s experiences helping organizations craft and staff these programs.
Grab the Secure Mobile Application Development Reference here - http://www.denimgroup.com/know_artic_secure_mobile_application_development_reference.html
Are you looking to build a program to ensure maximum mobile security coverage?
If you are tasked with putting together a security testing program to address risk with internally developed mobile applications, there is no shortage of technical and process factors to consider. It is also critical to balance the security with a positive end-user experience, helping propel the overall brand forward - safely. Without proper mobile security, one significant loss can quickly destroy the trust foundation your company has worked years to craft.
This webinar will provide the security leader an overview of the challenges associated with mobile testing, certain technologies that one can use to identify mobile application vulnerabilities, and repeatable process strategies that will help build the foundation for a recurring testing program.
The session will provide attendees a broad understanding of mobile technologies, as well as a mobile testing launch checklist that will help your organization go from ground floor to a fully-functioning testing program in 30 days.
The session will also include:
An overview of the major mobile technologies and their defining attributes
An overview of how iOS and Android handle certain security issues differently via the Denim Group Mobile Development Reference Guide
An overview of a typical mobile application architecture and how it differs from a web application environment
How important web services are to a typical mobile architecture
The limitations of automated testing and how to augment security reviews to overcome testing gaps
How to make a program repeatable and economically feasible without disrupting the software development process
Many organizations have only a passing understanding of the scope of their application portfolios and how these assets are exposed to the Internet and other potentially dangerous networks. This puts them in a risky situation where they have attack surface that is unknown and unmanaged, often resulting in serious vulnerabilities being exposed indefinitely. This presentation looks at several tools and methods that can be used to enumerate enterprise application assets – including web applications, mobile applications, and web services. The discussion covers several open source application asset identification tools and compares their effectiveness. Finally, a framework for ongoing application asset discovery and enumeration is presented so that security managers can embark on a structured program to characterize their risk exposure due to their enterprise attack surface.
Many organizations have only a passing understanding of the scope of their application portfolios and how these assets are exposed to the Internet and other potentially dangerous networks. This puts them in a risky situation where they have an attack surface that is unknown and unmanaged, often resulting in serious vulnerabilities being exposed indefinitely. This presentation looks at several tools and methods that can be used to enumerate enterprise application assets – including web applications, mobile applications, and web services. The discussion covers several open source application asset identification tools and compares their effectiveness. Finally, a framework for ongoing application asset discovery and enumeration is presented so that security managers can embark on a structured program to characterize their risk exposure due to their enterprise attack surface.
Using Collaboration to Make Application Vulnerability Management a Team SportDenim Group
Vulnerability management - especially application vulnerability management - is a challenging business function because it crosses disciplinary boundaries. Security teams find and adjudicate vulnerabilities, DevOps and server ops teams have to fix them, and GRC teams need to be kept apprised of status and progress. As has always been the case - but especially in a necessarily remote work environment - collaboration is key to making these business functions operate efficiently and effectively. This webinar looks at common bottlenecks that snarl vulnerability remediation workflows and discusses strategies to address these issues via collaboration. Examples are given of implementing these via the ThreadFix platform, but the strategies are universally-applicable for vulnerability management professionals looking to streamline their vulnerability remediation workflows.
Application Asset Management with ThreadFixDenim Group
Too many organizations have an incomplete picture of their application portfolios. Because you are unable to protect attack surfaces that you don’t know about, this leaves them vulnerable. In this webinar, we will cover the capabilities that ThreadFix has to allows security teams to manage their application asset portfolios. We will also take a deeper dive into several tools such as nmap and OWASP Amass that can help security analysts better enumerate all of the applications in their organization’s portfolio.
How to Integrate AppSec Testing into your DevOps Program Denim Group
During this live webinar, IBM & Denim Group join forces to demonstrate how Application Security Testing can be integrated with DevOps methodologies to identify and remediate high-risk vulnerabilities quickly, with minimal overhead.
Specifically, we’ll discuss how you can integrate Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) using IBM AppScan Enterprise REST API into a DevOps CI/CD pipeline, which helps you to automatically identify high-risk vulnerabilities within web applications and web services. We’ll also show how using Denim Group’s ThreadFix offering with AppScan Enterprise allows for seamless integration with typical DevOps tool-sets, in order to further reduce the overhead associated with AppSec testing within the SDLC.
Reducing Attack Surface in Budget Constrained EnvironmentsDenim Group
Sprawling networks, streaming vendor vulnerability updates, and an application portfolio that remains a mystery keep you up late wondering where your weakest link exists. Budget constraints make you wonder where to begin, given that the responsibility to protect your organization remains firmly on your shoulders. How do savvy leaders identify the most pressing exposures and prioritize their efforts given limited budgets? What are the strategies that sophisticated IT and security leaders pursue to identify the scariest vulnerabilities and fix them before attackers find them? This session will lay out actionable plans to immediately identify and reduce more of your organization’s attack surface.
Improve the Security of Your Application Portfolio in a Few Days with On-Dema...Capgemini
Under pressure to deploy more applications and releases, organizations need industrial application protection and security testing processes for huge software portfolios.
Find out how a flexible service from testing and security leaders Capgemini and Sogeti can improve the security of your applications, test them on demand, and get results in days.
Powered by HPE Fortify on Demand and hosted in a private infrastructure in Europe, it requires no license, hardware, special expertise, or investment.
Presented at Discover London 2015.
How is Your AppSec Program Doing Compared to OthersDenim Group
Organizations that build software and worry about security continually are asking, "How do we stack up to others?"
If you are starting or inheriting an application security program that is underway, you're probably curious how your organization stacks up against others. Are you doing the right set of application testing activities? Are you training your developers to write more secure code in the most efficient manner? Does your SDLC need a review to determine whether security activities need to be included throughout?
A popular framework for benchmarking an organization’s software security activities is called the Open Software Assurance Maturity Model (OpenSAMM) developed and published by the Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP).
To hear the full webinar, hit this link - http://denimgroup.com/webinar_How-is-Your-AppSec-Program-Doing-Compared-to-Others.html
Enterprise on the Go - Devon Winkworth, Snr. Principal Consultant, Layer 7 @ ...CA API Management
Devon Winkworth, Snr. Principal Consultant for Layer 7, presented on the essentials for BYOD & Mobile Enablement during The Mobile Asia Show in Singapore. He discusses BYOD and the app explosion and factors driving BYOD Adoption, along with approaches to address challenges with BYOD.
AppSec Fast and Slow: Your DevSecOps CI/CD Pipeline Isn’t an SSA ProgramDenim Group
With all the focus on DevSecOps and integrating security into Continuous Integration/Continuous Delivery (CI/CD) pipelines, some teams may be lured into thinking that the entirety of a Software Security Assurance (SSA) program can be baked into these pipelines. While integrating security into CI/CD offers many benefits, it is critical to understand that a full SSA program encompasses a variety of activities – many of which are incompatible with run time restrictions and other constraints imposed by these pipelines. This webinar looks at the breadth of activities involved in a mature SSA program and steps through the aspects of a program that can be realistically included in a pipeline, as well as those that cannot. It also reviews how these activities and related tooling have evolved over time as the application security discipline has matured and as development teams started to focus on cloud-native development techniques and technologies.
Threat Modeling for System Builders and System Breakers - Dan Cornell of Deni...Denim Group
Threat modeling is a valuable technique for identifying potential security issues in complex applications but many teams have been slow to adopt. This presentation looks at Threat Modeling from two perspectives – from that of a system builder trying to avoid introducing security defects into a new system and from that of a system tester trying to identify security issues in an existing system. The materials include discussion of where threat modeling is best done during the development lifecycle as well as the process of creating and refining a threat model.
Follow Dan Cornell on twitter - @danielcornell
Using 80 20 rule in application security managementDaveEdwards12
80/20 rule (also known as Pareto Principle) is one of the most beautiful rules which helps to achieve as well as fail. In most of the cases where it goes wrong was finally turned out to be figuring out the “right few”. This is probably one of the most elusive rules. It is easy to understand but extremely difficult to practice.
Enabling Developers in Your Application Security Program With Coverity and Th...Denim Group
Developers need to move quickly and efficiently. Coverity’s speed, accuracy, ease of use, and scalability meet the needs of even the largest, most complex environments. ThreadFix allows you to centralize all test and vulnerability data in one place so your software security team can spend less time on manually correlating results and more time focusing on higher-level risk decisions. Join us to get a firsthand look at how Coverity and ThreadFix arm development teams with the tools they need to advance security programs in real time.
Managing Penetration Testing Programs and Vulnerability Time to Live with Thr...Denim Group
This webinar takes a dive into the biggest features and benefits in the latest ThreadFix release and the evolving feature set. We will focus on ThreadFix’s new capabilities, including - managing internal penetration testing teams with ThreadFix, tracking vulnerability time to live policies, as well as a host of additional enhancements.
An Inside Look at a Sophisticated Multi-Vector DDoS AttackImperva Incapsula
By Nabeel Saeed
This presentation explores the current DDoS attack landscape, it covers the basics of DDoS attacks, current trends including the most recent results from the newly published 2015 Imperva Incapsula DDoS Report. It also discusses a detailed analysis of one of today’s modern, multi-vector DDoS attacks. While dissecting this DDoS attack, this presentation explores the anatomy and timeline of the attack, as well as the steps used to mitigate each phase of the assault. This session will close with a review of the aspects of effective DDoS protection solutions used to combat these sophisticated denial of service attacks.
The Internet of Things (IoT) is an exciting and emerging area of technology allowing individuals and businesses to make radical changes to how they live their lives and conduct commerce. The challenge with this trend is that IoT devices are just computers with sensors running applications. Because IoT devices interact with our personal lives, the proliferation of these devices exposes an unprecedented amount of personal sensitive data to significant risk. In addition, IoT security is not only about the code running on the device, these devices are connected to systems that include supporting web services as well as other client applications that allow for management and reporting.
A critical step to understanding the security of any system is building a threat model. This helps to enumerate the components of the system as well as the paths that data takes as it flows through the system. Combining this information with an understanding of trust boundaries helps provide system designers with critical information to mitigate systemic risks to the technology and architecture.
This webinar looks at how Threat Modeling can be applied to IoT systems to help build more security systems during the design process, as well as how to use Threat Modeling when testing the security of IoT systems.
WeSecure Data Security Congres: 5 must haves to safe cloud enablementWeSecure
Jamie Barnett from Netskope describes how to enable SaaS while Securing Data. For more information about netskope, see: https://www.wesecure.nl/producten/netskope/
Application Security Testing for a DevOps Mindset Denim Group
The cultural transition to DevOps is coming to organizations, and security teams must learn to adapt or be marginalized. Forward-thinking security teams will use this transition to their advantage and will reap the benefits of better and more frequent security insight into development cycles. By understanding the goals of development teams, security representatives can help to meaningfully include themselves in the development process and provide value through sensible risk management.
Similar to Structuring and Scaling an Application Security Program (20)
In its aftermath, Log4j vulnerabilities put the spotlight on vendor management and supply chain security practices. Now that the dust has settled and the worst of the fallout has passed, this talk presents perspectives on likely mid- and long-term changes that the security industry will see as a result of dealing with the Log4j issue as the latest in an escalating series of open source and software supply chain incidents.
Threat Modeling the CI/CD Pipeline to Improve Software Supply Chain Security ...Denim Group
The SolarWinds attack brought additional scrutiny software supply chain security, but concerns about organizations’ software supply chains have been discussed for a number of years. Development organizations’ shift to DevOps or DevSecOps has pushed teams to adopt new technologies in the build pipeline – often hosted by 3rd parties. This has resulted in build pipelines that expose a complicated and often uncharted attack surface. In addition, modern products also incorporate code from a variety of contributors – ranging from in-house developers, 3rd party development contractors, as well as an array open source contributors.
This talk looks at the challenge of developing secure build pipelines. This is done via the construction of a threat model for an example software build pipeline that walks through how the various systems and communications along the way can potentially be misused by malicious actors. Coverage of the major components of a build pipeline – source control, open source component management, software builds, automated testing, and packaging for distribution – is used to enumerate likely attack surface exposed via the build process and to highlight potential controls that can be put in place to harden the pipeline against attacks. The presentation is intended to be useful both for evaluating internal build processes as well as to support the evaluation of critical external vendors’ processes.
Threat Modeling the CI/CD Pipeline to Improve Software Supply Chain Security ...Denim Group
The SolarWinds attack brought additional scrutiny software supply chain security, but concerns about organizations’ software supply chains have been discussed for a number of years. Development organizations’ shift to DevOps or DevSecOps has pushed teams to adopt new technologies in the build pipeline – often hosted by 3rd parties. This has resulted in build pipelines that expose a complicated and often uncharted attack surface. In addition, modern products also incorporate code from a variety of contributors – ranging from in-house developers, 3rd party development contractors, as well as an array open source contributors.
This talk looks at the challenge of developing secure build pipelines. This is done via the construction of a threat model for an example software build pipeline that walks through how the various systems and communications along the way can potentially be misused by malicious actors. Coverage of the major components of a build pipeline – source control, open source component management, software builds, automated testing, and packaging for distribution – is used to enumerate likely attack surface exposed via the build process and to highlight potential controls that can be put in place to harden the pipeline against attacks. The presentation is intended to be useful both for evaluating internal build processes as well as to support the evaluation of critical external vendors’ processes.
Optimizing Security Velocity in Your DevSecOps Pipeline at ScaleDenim Group
Businesses are driving development teams to build, test and deliver app innovations faster and faster, while attackers continue to grow in sophistication and complexity. To protect the business, dev and security teams are deploying multiple app/network/OSS security testing tools, internal & 3rd party manual assessments, and other processes which in turn drives an exponential spike in volume of issues to analyze, correlate, triage, route and repair. Facing this data deluge, DevSecOps teams are turning to automation of mobile app security testing and orchestration of vulnerability management for speed and scale. Join Brian Reed, Chief Mobility Officer of NowSecure and Dan Cornell, Co-Founder and CTO of Denim Group in this best practices session to learn how to drive efficiencies in team and pipeline performance at scale.
The As, Bs, and Four Cs of Testing Cloud-Native ApplicationsDenim Group
Security assessments are a critical part of any security program. Being able to identify – and communicate about – vulnerabilities systems is required to get vulnerabilities prioritized for remediation. For web and mobile applications, assessment methodologies are reasonably straightforward and established. However, for cloud-native applications, the combination of new technologies and architectural elements has introduced questions about how to scope, plan, and execute security assessments. This presentation looks at how the assessment landscape has changed with the introduction of cloud-native applications and explores how threat modeling is central to testing their security. In addition, the “Four C’s” conceptual model for looking at cloud-native application security is introduced, including a discussion of how both automated and manual testing methodologies can be used to accomplish assessment goals. Finally, vulnerability contextualization and reporting are discussed, so that teams running cloud-native application assessments can properly characterize the results of their efforts to aid in the prioritization and remediation of identified issues.
An Updated Take: Threat Modeling for IoT SystemsDenim Group
The Internet of Things (IoT) is an exciting and emerging area of technology allowing individuals and businesses to make radical changes to how they live their lives and conduct commerce. The challenge with this trend is that IoT devices are just computers with sensors running applications. Because IoT devices interact with our personal lives, the proliferation of these devices exposes an unprecedented amount of personal sensitive data to significant risk. In addition, IoT security is not only about the code running on the device, these devices are connected to systems that include supporting web services as well as other client applications that allow for management and reporting.
A critical step to understanding the security of any system is building a threat model. This helps to enumerate the components of the system as well as the paths that data takes as it flows through the system. Combining this information with an understanding of trust boundaries helps provide system designers with critical information to mitigate systemic risks to the technology and architecture.
This webinar looks at how Threat Modeling can be applied to IoT systems to help build more security systems during the design process, as well as how to use Threat Modeling when testing the security of IoT systems.
Continuous Authority to Operate (ATO) with ThreadFix – Bringing Commercial In...Denim Group
The tempo for software delivery to the warfighter continues to accelerate to meet the goals and demands of their missions. Pressures to rapidly build and deploy mission software drive the need to deliver new capabilities via DevSecOps pipelines. Many of the latest leading-edge DevSecOps practices draw heavily from commercial tech companies and innovative programs across DoD like Kessel Run. What are these latest trends, and how do you take advantage of them? How do you quantify the risk of microservices, new languages and frameworks, and cloud environments and still obtain authority to operate (ATO)?
The ThreadFix platform has built-in automation and orchestration capabilities to enable your teams to provide immediate feedback in the form of policy evaluation, notifications in the form of emails and automated developer defect creation, and decision-making on your CI program as scan results are generated. In addition to built-in automation, plugins and the ThreadFix API enable CI programs to seamlessly integrate security testing into existing build/release pipelines to provide evaluation of code changes directly to your development tools.
These key issue items and other trends will be discussed in this highly interactive briefing, providing critical insights on how to inject agility and responsiveness into environments that have traditionally struggled to keep pace with modern development approaches.
A New View of Your Application Security Program with Snyk and ThreadFixDenim Group
Snyk continuously monitors your application’s dependencies and lets you quickly respond when new vulnerabilities are disclosed. Threadfix allows organizations to gain true visibility into a your project’s security posture by cross referencing results on an app from multiple sources (SCA, SAST, DAST, etc.), ultimately enabling better prioritization, while Snyk focuses on remediation at the source with the automated fix pull requests. Join us to see how, together, Snyk and ThreadFix can enhance application security and prevent risks, while preserving development scale and speed.
Enabling Developers in Your Application Security Program With Coverity and Th...Denim Group
Developers need to move quickly and efficiently. Coverity’s speed, accuracy, ease of use, and scalability meet the needs of even the largest, most complex environments. ThreadFix allows you to centralize all test and vulnerability data in one place so your software security team can spend less time on manually correlating results and more time focusing on higher-level risk decisions. Join us to get a firsthand look at how Coverity and ThreadFix arm development teams with the tools they need to advance security programs in real time.
AppSec in a World of Digital TransformationDenim Group
The mandate for digital transformation is forcing companies to innovate faster in order to provide more value to customers and bring products and services to the market more quickly. Technological innovations such as the cloud, microservice architectures, and CI/CD pipelines are being adopted to support the increased pace of development and more easily address scaling requirements. This upheaval presents both risks and opportunities for security leaders. The successful leaders view this transition as a clean-slate opportunity to “get security right” and will restructure their teams and technologies to deeply-embed security throughout the new tech stack. This session will cover emerging strategies that security leaders are using to ensure they keep up with this massive industry change.
The As, Bs, and Four Cs of Testing Cloud-Native ApplicationsDenim Group
Security assessments are a critical part of any security program. Being able to identify – and communicate about – vulnerabilities systems is required to get vulnerabilities prioritized for remediation. For web and mobile applications, assessment methodologies are reasonably straightforward and established. However, for cloud-native applications, the combination of new technologies and architectural elements has introduced questions about how to scope, plan, and execute security assessments. This presentation looks at how the assessment landscape has changed with the introduction of cloud-native applications and explores how threat modeling is central to testing their security. In addition, the “Four C’s” conceptual model for looking at cloud-native application security is introduced, including a discussion of how both automated and manual testing methodologies can be used to accomplish assessment goals. Finally, vulnerability contextualization and reporting are discussed, so that teams running cloud-native application assessments can properly characterize the results of their efforts to aid in the prioritization and remediation of identified issues.
AppSec in a World of Digital TransformationDenim Group
The mandate for digital transformation is forcing companies to innovate faster in order to provide more value to customers and bring products and services to the market more quickly. Technological innovations such as the cloud, microservice architectures, and CI/CD pipelines are being adopted to support the increased pace of development and more easily address scaling requirements. This upheaval presents both risks and opportunities for security leaders. The successful leaders view this transition as a clean-slate opportunity to “get security right” and will restructure their teams and technologies to deeply-embed security throughout the new tech stack. This session will cover emerging strategies that security leaders are using to ensure they keep up with this massive industry change.
Assessing Business Operations Risk With Unified Vulnerability Management in T...Denim Group
For almost 10 years, ThreadFix has been the preeminent solution for managing your application vulnerabilities. In that time, it has grown from that initial correlation and reporting engine which brought your SAST and DAST vulnerabilities together, into a developer-integrated, CI/CD-enabling management platform. Deployed and used in Fortune 100 companies ranging from entertainment to banking to health care, in addition to some of the largest organizations within the Federal Government, ThreadFix now helps organizations correlate and prioritize risk across their applications and the network infrastructure that supports them.
Join us as we debut the largest update to the ThreadFix platform to date, ThreadFix 3.0. Featuring new network vulnerability management tools, a new containerized microservices architecture, and a new user interface, ThreadFix 3.0 is the solution for comprehensive and correlated risk-based reporting on your entire portfolio of applications and infrastructure assets.
An OWASP SAMM Perspective on Serverless ComputingDenim Group
Serverless architectures enable organizations to build and deploy software and services without maintaining or provisioning any physical or virtual servers. They are an excellent choice for a wide range of services, and can scale elastically as cloud workloads grow, and as a result have become a popular architectural element for development teams. However, this new approach can have a significant impact on the security of systems, and many teams are not familiar with how to securely incorporate serverless elements into their architectures. Using the OWASP SAMM maturity model as a framework, this webinar walks through how teams adopting serverless computing can do so in a secure manner and consistent with their organization’s roadmap for maturing their application security posture.
Optimize Your Security Program with ThreadFix 2.7Denim Group
ThreadFix 2.7’s feature set represents the most significant expansion to the platform since ThreadFix was first released almost 10 years ago. This release bundles new application risk-ranking capabilities with the powerful addition to receive a 3rd party assessment for any application managed within ThreadFix. Join us to see how your team’s capacity and capabilities can be instantly expanded through on-demand application security assessments delivered directly into your ThreadFix instance, adding Denim Group’s nearly two decades of application security experience to your team anytime you need it.
Securing Voting Infrastructure before the Mid-Term ElectionsDenim Group
The prospect of nation state interference with our 2018 mid-term elections is a reality that secretaries of state are facing. Given the fast-changing nature of the threat and the sprawling election infrastructure across the country, how are state officials securing their voting systems and databases in anticipation of the election? What are emerging strategies given the limited resources and unlimited needs? Where are the most vulnerable parts of the election systems and where should state officials focus their efforts given the potential for disruption? This webinar will provide an attacker’s view of a typical state-run election system and will make recommendations where to focus limited time and resources in the run up of the 2018 mid-term election in November.
Understanding IoT Security: How to Quantify Security Risk of IoT TechnologiesDenim Group
IoT devices are proliferating throughout corporate networks raising concerns about security risks they may introduce. However, IoT technologies differ in many ways from most enterprise-ready technologies that currently exist. Understanding the risks that IoT represents and how to best quantify that risk can be a challenge for many security leaders. This webinar provides an overview of IoT architectures, how they differ from existing infrastructure devices, and how best to measure the risk IoT devices represent. It will expose attendees to concepts like Threat Modeling for IoT and provide additional references that will help build a successful IoT security assessment program.
GraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge GraphGuy Korland
Guy Korland, CEO and Co-founder of FalkorDB, will review two articles on the integration of language models with knowledge graphs.
1. Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08302
2. Microsoft Research's GraphRAG paper and a review paper on various uses of knowledge graphs:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/graphrag-unlocking-llm-discovery-on-narrative-private-data/
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 3DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 3. In this session, we will cover desktop automation along with UI automation.
Topics covered:
UI automation Introduction,
UI automation Sample
Desktop automation flow
Pradeep Chinnala, Senior Consultant Automation Developer @WonderBotz and UiPath MVP
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Accelerate your Kubernetes clusters with Varnish CachingThijs Feryn
A presentation about the usage and availability of Varnish on Kubernetes. This talk explores the capabilities of Varnish caching and shows how to use the Varnish Helm chart to deploy it to Kubernetes.
This presentation was delivered at K8SUG Singapore. See https://feryn.eu/presentations/accelerate-your-kubernetes-clusters-with-varnish-caching-k8sug-singapore-28-2024 for more details.
Epistemic Interaction - tuning interfaces to provide information for AI supportAlan Dix
Paper presented at SYNERGY workshop at AVI 2024, Genoa, Italy. 3rd June 2024
https://alandix.com/academic/papers/synergy2024-epistemic/
As machine learning integrates deeper into human-computer interactions, the concept of epistemic interaction emerges, aiming to refine these interactions to enhance system adaptability. This approach encourages minor, intentional adjustments in user behaviour to enrich the data available for system learning. This paper introduces epistemic interaction within the context of human-system communication, illustrating how deliberate interaction design can improve system understanding and adaptation. Through concrete examples, we demonstrate the potential of epistemic interaction to significantly advance human-computer interaction by leveraging intuitive human communication strategies to inform system design and functionality, offering a novel pathway for enriching user-system engagements.
Builder.ai Founder Sachin Dev Duggal's Strategic Approach to Create an Innova...Ramesh Iyer
In today's fast-changing business world, Companies that adapt and embrace new ideas often need help to keep up with the competition. However, fostering a culture of innovation takes much work. It takes vision, leadership and willingness to take risks in the right proportion. Sachin Dev Duggal, co-founder of Builder.ai, has perfected the art of this balance, creating a company culture where creativity and growth are nurtured at each stage.
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*Frank van Harmelen
Neuro-symbolic (NeSy) AI is on the rise. However, simply machine learning on just any symbolic structure is not sufficient to really harvest the gains of NeSy. These will only be gained when the symbolic structures have an actual semantics. I give an operational definition of semantics as “predictable inference”.
All of this illustrated with link prediction over knowledge graphs, but the argument is general.
"Impact of front-end architecture on development cost", Viktor TurskyiFwdays
I have heard many times that architecture is not important for the front-end. Also, many times I have seen how developers implement features on the front-end just following the standard rules for a framework and think that this is enough to successfully launch the project, and then the project fails. How to prevent this and what approach to choose? I have launched dozens of complex projects and during the talk we will analyze which approaches have worked for me and which have not.
Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...Jeffrey Haguewood
Sidekick Solutions uses Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apricot) and automation solutions to integrate data for business workflows.
We believe integration and automation are essential to user experience and the promise of efficient work through technology. Automation is the critical ingredient to realizing that full vision. We develop integration products and services for Bonterra Case Management software to support the deployment of automations for a variety of use cases.
This video focuses on the notifications, alerts, and approval requests using Slack for Bonterra Impact Management. The solutions covered in this webinar can also be deployed for Microsoft Teams.
Interested in deploying notification automations for Bonterra Impact Management? Contact us at sales@sidekicksolutionsllc.com to discuss next steps.
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...UiPathCommunity
💥 Speed, accuracy, and scaling – discover the superpowers of GenAI in action with UiPath Document Understanding and Communications Mining™:
See how to accelerate model training and optimize model performance with active learning
Learn about the latest enhancements to out-of-the-box document processing – with little to no training required
Get an exclusive demo of the new family of UiPath LLMs – GenAI models specialized for processing different types of documents and messages
This is a hands-on session specifically designed for automation developers and AI enthusiasts seeking to enhance their knowledge in leveraging the latest intelligent document processing capabilities offered by UiPath.
Speakers:
👨🏫 Andras Palfi, Senior Product Manager, UiPath
👩🏫 Lenka Dulovicova, Product Program Manager, UiPath
PHP Frameworks: I want to break free (IPC Berlin 2024)Ralf Eggert
In this presentation, we examine the challenges and limitations of relying too heavily on PHP frameworks in web development. We discuss the history of PHP and its frameworks to understand how this dependence has evolved. The focus will be on providing concrete tips and strategies to reduce reliance on these frameworks, based on real-world examples and practical considerations. The goal is to equip developers with the skills and knowledge to create more flexible and future-proof web applications. We'll explore the importance of maintaining autonomy in a rapidly changing tech landscape and how to make informed decisions in PHP development.
This talk is aimed at encouraging a more independent approach to using PHP frameworks, moving towards a more flexible and future-proof approach to PHP development.