This presentation is on structural realism. It explains the different or similar views of offensive and defensive realists on stability, war and best possible stable international system.
Structural realism argues that states inherently compete for power in an anarchic international system where there is no overarching authority. This competition arises from five key assumptions: 1) great powers are the main actors; 2) states have offensive military capabilities; 3) states cannot be certain of others' intentions; 4) the main goal of states is survival; and 5) states are rational actors. While defensive realists argue enough power is enough, offensive realists believe states should maximize their power and potentially pursue hegemony. The system polarity - multipolar, bipolar, or unipolar - also impacts state behavior and conflict. Overall, structural realism sees international politics as inherently about power in an anarchic system.
This document provides an overview of realism as a theoretical perspective in international relations and global politics. It discusses two main versions of realism - classical realism and structural realism. Classical realism sees the pursuit of power as an innate human tendency, while structural realism views it as a result of the anarchic nature of the international system.
The document then contrasts offensive and defensive structural realism. Offensive realism believes states should maximize their power and pursue hegemony whenever possible to ensure survival. Defensive realism argues this is strategically foolish and states should seek an "appropriate" amount of power to avoid triggering a balancing response from other states. The document concludes by outlining how offensive and defensive realists
Relations among states take place in the absence of a world government. For realists, this means that the international system is anarchical. International relations are best understood by focusing on the distribution of power among states. Despite their formal legal equality, the uneven distribution of power means that the arena of international relations is a form of ‘power politics’. Power is hard to measure; its distribution among states changes over time and there is no consensus among states about how it should be distributed. International relations is therefore a realm of necessity (states must seek power to survive in a competitive environment) and continuity over time. When realists contemplate change in the international system, they focus on changes in the balance of power among states, and tend to discount the possibility of fundamental change in the dynamics of the system itself.
The following key thinkers all subscribe to these basic assumptions in their explorations of the following questions:
(1) What are the main sources of stability and instability in the international system?
(2) What is the actual and preferred balance of power among states?
(3) How should the great powers behave toward one another and toward weaker states?
(4) What are the sources and dynamics of contemporary changes in the balance of power?
Despite some shared assumptions about the nature of international relations, realists are not all of one voice in answering these questions, and it would be wrong to believe that shared assumptions lead to similar conclusions among them. In fact, there is sharp disagreement over the relative merits of particular balances of power (unipolarity, bipolarity and multipolarity). There is also much debate over the causal relationship between states and the international pressures upon them, and the relative importance of different kinds of power in contemporary international relations.
Liberalism views the global political system as characterized by complex interdependence rather than realism's focus on power. It argues that states are interdependent through multiple channels including non-state actors like corporations and NGOs. States are connected on multiple issues beyond just security, and military force is less effective due to these connections. As a result, cooperation is more common than conflict according to liberalism. The spread of democracy, nuclear weapons, wealth redistribution, and technology have increased complex interdependence in the modern world.
Neorealism, also called structural realism, argues that the international system influences state behavior based primarily on the distribution of power. It views states as acting to maximize their security in an anarchic system, which leads them to engage in a self-help balance of power. The theory was first established by Kenneth Waltz in his 1979 book Theory of International Politics, departing from classical realism by arguing that the structure of the international system, not human nature, determines state actions.
This presentation is on structural realism. It explains the different or similar views of offensive and defensive realists on stability, war and best possible stable international system.
Structural realism argues that states inherently compete for power in an anarchic international system where there is no overarching authority. This competition arises from five key assumptions: 1) great powers are the main actors; 2) states have offensive military capabilities; 3) states cannot be certain of others' intentions; 4) the main goal of states is survival; and 5) states are rational actors. While defensive realists argue enough power is enough, offensive realists believe states should maximize their power and potentially pursue hegemony. The system polarity - multipolar, bipolar, or unipolar - also impacts state behavior and conflict. Overall, structural realism sees international politics as inherently about power in an anarchic system.
This document provides an overview of realism as a theoretical perspective in international relations and global politics. It discusses two main versions of realism - classical realism and structural realism. Classical realism sees the pursuit of power as an innate human tendency, while structural realism views it as a result of the anarchic nature of the international system.
The document then contrasts offensive and defensive structural realism. Offensive realism believes states should maximize their power and pursue hegemony whenever possible to ensure survival. Defensive realism argues this is strategically foolish and states should seek an "appropriate" amount of power to avoid triggering a balancing response from other states. The document concludes by outlining how offensive and defensive realists
Relations among states take place in the absence of a world government. For realists, this means that the international system is anarchical. International relations are best understood by focusing on the distribution of power among states. Despite their formal legal equality, the uneven distribution of power means that the arena of international relations is a form of ‘power politics’. Power is hard to measure; its distribution among states changes over time and there is no consensus among states about how it should be distributed. International relations is therefore a realm of necessity (states must seek power to survive in a competitive environment) and continuity over time. When realists contemplate change in the international system, they focus on changes in the balance of power among states, and tend to discount the possibility of fundamental change in the dynamics of the system itself.
The following key thinkers all subscribe to these basic assumptions in their explorations of the following questions:
(1) What are the main sources of stability and instability in the international system?
(2) What is the actual and preferred balance of power among states?
(3) How should the great powers behave toward one another and toward weaker states?
(4) What are the sources and dynamics of contemporary changes in the balance of power?
Despite some shared assumptions about the nature of international relations, realists are not all of one voice in answering these questions, and it would be wrong to believe that shared assumptions lead to similar conclusions among them. In fact, there is sharp disagreement over the relative merits of particular balances of power (unipolarity, bipolarity and multipolarity). There is also much debate over the causal relationship between states and the international pressures upon them, and the relative importance of different kinds of power in contemporary international relations.
Liberalism views the global political system as characterized by complex interdependence rather than realism's focus on power. It argues that states are interdependent through multiple channels including non-state actors like corporations and NGOs. States are connected on multiple issues beyond just security, and military force is less effective due to these connections. As a result, cooperation is more common than conflict according to liberalism. The spread of democracy, nuclear weapons, wealth redistribution, and technology have increased complex interdependence in the modern world.
Neorealism, also called structural realism, argues that the international system influences state behavior based primarily on the distribution of power. It views states as acting to maximize their security in an anarchic system, which leads them to engage in a self-help balance of power. The theory was first established by Kenneth Waltz in his 1979 book Theory of International Politics, departing from classical realism by arguing that the structure of the international system, not human nature, determines state actions.
The document discusses several major theoretical paradigms for explaining cooperation and conflict in international relations, including realism, liberalism, and constructivism. It provides an overview of key theories within each paradigm related to topics like alliances, polarity, and economic interdependence. Major theories discussed include democratic peace theory, balance of power, and theories of rivalry and territory. The document aims to explain the theoretical foundations and logical progression from premises to fully developed international relations theories.
The document discusses several concepts from realist international relations theory including power, survival, and anarchy. It summarizes views of different theorists such as Thucydides, Machiavelli, Morgenthau, and Waltz. A key point discussed is the idea that in the international system, where there is no overarching authority, states are driven primarily by self-interest and power maximization in their relations with other states.
Kenneth N. Waltz was an American political scientist who was a member of the faculty at both the University of California, Berkeley and Columbia University and one of the most prominent scholars in the field of international relations. He was a veteran of both World War II and the Korean War.
Waltz was a founder of neorealism, or structural realism, in international relations theory. Waltz's theories have been extensively debated within the field of international relations. In 1981, Waltz published a monograph arguing that in some cases the proliferation of nuclear weapons could increase the probability of international peace.
Realism is an international relations theory that focuses on power and security. It has several core assumptions including that states are the main actors, their primary concern is survival in an anarchic system, and they will use whatever means necessary to ensure their security. There are different strands of realism including classical realism which emphasizes human nature and neo-realism which focuses more on the structure of the international system. Realism is criticized for being too state-centric and for justifying amoral actions in the name of survival. Overall, realism provides a lens for understanding international politics based on power dynamics between self-interested states.
(1) Realism has three key principles: statism, survival, and self-help. Statism focuses on the state as the main actor with sovereignty. Survival examines whether power is an end in itself or for security. Self-help means states operate in an anarchic system without higher authority.
(2) Realism comes in three forms: classical, structural, and contemporary. Classical realism sees states as self-serving, while structural realism examines how the international system creates a struggle for power. Contemporary realism incorporates domestic factors into states' behavior.
(3) Criticisms of realism question what it means for states to seek power and whether power is a means or end. It is also
Political Science 7 – International Relations - Power Point #5John Paul Tabakian
This document provides an overview of several topics discussed in Dr. Tabakian's Political Science 7 course on modern world governments, including: liberal institutionalism and international regimes; collective security; the waning of war; peace studies; democratic peace theory; and feminist approaches to international relations. Key theorists discussed include Kant, Keohane, Nye, and Wendt. The document also summarizes perspectives on gender in war and peace, and the roles and impacts of women in international relations.
3 Approaches in International RelationsWai-Kwok Wong
This document discusses three approaches to understanding international relations: realism, idealism, and radicalism. Realism views international politics as a struggle for power between nation-states based on self-interest. Idealism believes cooperation between nation-states and international organizations can promote peace and harmony. Radicalism sees international relations as being defined by conflicts between dominant social classes and nation-states on a global scale. No single approach can perfectly explain the complexity of world politics, and different aspects of each may apply depending on the issue and context.
This document provides an overview and critique of realism and liberalism as international relations theories. It notes that realism views states as rational actors seeking power and security, with a competitive human nature. Realism is criticized for ignoring non-state actors and non-military forces. Liberalism emphasizes interaction between states and other actors as leading to a more cooperative world, but is critiqued for downplaying the importance of wars and reducing predictability. The document concludes by framing an evaluation of structural realism and liberalism, suggesting strengths and weaknesses be weighed with supporting evidence.
Theories of International Relations essayNatasha Alves
This document discusses and compares classical realism and neorealism as international relations theories. It defines the key differences between the two approaches, including that classical realism views power as an end in itself driven by human nature, while neorealism sees power as a means to ensure state survival in an anarchic system. The document uses the 2003 US invasion of Iraq as a case study to illustrate how classical realism and neorealism would explain the motivation for the invasion differently, with classical realism focusing more on individual leaders and neorealism emphasizing structural factors of maintaining a balance of power. Overall, the document argues that while classical realism and neorealism share realist assumptions, there are significant
The document discusses the concept of balance of power in international relations. It provides definitions from various scholars throughout history. Some key points:
1) Balance of power refers to a state of equilibrium or distribution of power among states so that no single state can dominate the others and impose its will.
2) Scholars have defined it as both an equality of power distribution as well as a disequilibrium, with states preferring a balance in their own favor.
3) It has been used to describe a policy, system, status, and symbol in international politics throughout the ages from the 15th to 19th centuries.
4) There is no universal agreement on its precise meaning as it can refer to
International Relations Theory outlines three main perspectives - Realism, Liberalism, and Constructivism. Realism views states as seeking power and security above all else, competing in a zero-sum system. Liberalism acknowledges other actors beyond states and believes cooperation is possible. Constructivism sees states' interests shaped by their unique histories and cultures. The document recommends blending theories, as no single perspective can fully explain complex international dynamics.
1. The document discusses the key differences between neorealism and neoliberal institutionalism, also known as liberal institutionalism.
2. Neorealism, as developed by Kenneth Waltz, focuses on international structure defined by anarchy and the distribution of power among states. States are concerned with relative gains and cooperate only when it is in their security interests.
3. Neoliberal institutionalism, developed by Robert Keohane and Joseph Nye, sees institutions as facilitating cooperation by coordinating policy responses, reinforcing reciprocity, and punishing defection. It emphasizes complex interdependence and transnational links between states and non-state actors.
The document discusses some of the hidden dangers of using Facebook based on an expert's analysis. It outlines 5 main risks: 1) personal information being shared with third parties through applications and connections; 2) privacy settings reverting to less safe defaults with site redesigns; 3) ads potentially containing malware; 4) friends unintentionally exposing personal information; and 5) profile information retention even after deleting accounts. The expert warns that Facebook's business practices sometimes compromise users' privacy for marketing goals.
The document outlines the Heidelberg Institute for International Conflict Research's (HIIKR) definition of political conflict and their methodology for measuring conflict intensity on a scale from dispute to war. A political conflict involves at least two assertive actors with opposing positions on issues relevant to a society, carried out through observable measures outside of established procedures that threaten core state functions or international order. The HIIKR system classifies conflicts as disputes, non-violent crises, violent crises, limited wars, or wars based on the level of physical violence used and the consequences of conflict measures.
This document summarizes key concepts in international relations theory, comparing realist and liberal perspectives. It discusses concepts like anarchy, sovereignty, self-help, and the security dilemma from a realist viewpoint. Liberal concepts discussed include Kantian ideals of democracy, trade, and international institutions promoting cooperation. Realists are skeptical that institutions can significantly influence state behavior motivated by power and national interests in an anarchic system.
Classical realism in International RelationsAdnan Munir
Classical realism views international relations as rooted in human nature and the pursuit of power. Theorists like Thucydides saw states acting to determine others based on their relative power. Machiavelli advised rulers to be cunning and ruthless to ensure their state's survival. Hobbes believed the international system was anarchic and states were in a perpetual state of war due to the human lust for power. Morgenthau also saw the pursuit of power as the driving force behind conflicts between states. Classical realists reject moralist approaches and see national interests defined by the quest for power.
Realism is the most dominant school of thought in international relations. It views states as unitary, rational actors concerned with military security above all else. Realists believe human nature is selfish and states are inherently aggressive or obsessed with security. Key realist theorists include Thucydides, Machiavelli, Hobbes, E.H. Carr, and Hans Morgenthau. Realism values maintaining the status quo and is criticized for ignoring non-state actors and other forces like ethics.
This document provides biographical information on several political philosophers and theorists including Niccolo Machiavelli, Carl von Clausewitz, Hans Morgenthau, and Thomas Hobbes. It outlines their key works and contributions to the development of political realism as a theory of international relations. Machiavelli is described as the "father of modern political theory" while Clausewitz introduced important concepts in his work On War. Morgenthau helped define the principles of political realism and Hobbes wrote Leviathan, which established fundamentals of liberal political thought.
How to implement meeting decisions successfullyibrahimkoncak
This presentation is on implementing meeting decisions at institutions of any kind. It answers two fundamental questions; Why are some decisions not implemented and How can this be reversed?
In this presentation, a sample of teacher evaluation by students demonstrated. The questions are in English and Russian. The presentation aims to promote better education.
The document discusses several major theoretical paradigms for explaining cooperation and conflict in international relations, including realism, liberalism, and constructivism. It provides an overview of key theories within each paradigm related to topics like alliances, polarity, and economic interdependence. Major theories discussed include democratic peace theory, balance of power, and theories of rivalry and territory. The document aims to explain the theoretical foundations and logical progression from premises to fully developed international relations theories.
The document discusses several concepts from realist international relations theory including power, survival, and anarchy. It summarizes views of different theorists such as Thucydides, Machiavelli, Morgenthau, and Waltz. A key point discussed is the idea that in the international system, where there is no overarching authority, states are driven primarily by self-interest and power maximization in their relations with other states.
Kenneth N. Waltz was an American political scientist who was a member of the faculty at both the University of California, Berkeley and Columbia University and one of the most prominent scholars in the field of international relations. He was a veteran of both World War II and the Korean War.
Waltz was a founder of neorealism, or structural realism, in international relations theory. Waltz's theories have been extensively debated within the field of international relations. In 1981, Waltz published a monograph arguing that in some cases the proliferation of nuclear weapons could increase the probability of international peace.
Realism is an international relations theory that focuses on power and security. It has several core assumptions including that states are the main actors, their primary concern is survival in an anarchic system, and they will use whatever means necessary to ensure their security. There are different strands of realism including classical realism which emphasizes human nature and neo-realism which focuses more on the structure of the international system. Realism is criticized for being too state-centric and for justifying amoral actions in the name of survival. Overall, realism provides a lens for understanding international politics based on power dynamics between self-interested states.
(1) Realism has three key principles: statism, survival, and self-help. Statism focuses on the state as the main actor with sovereignty. Survival examines whether power is an end in itself or for security. Self-help means states operate in an anarchic system without higher authority.
(2) Realism comes in three forms: classical, structural, and contemporary. Classical realism sees states as self-serving, while structural realism examines how the international system creates a struggle for power. Contemporary realism incorporates domestic factors into states' behavior.
(3) Criticisms of realism question what it means for states to seek power and whether power is a means or end. It is also
Political Science 7 – International Relations - Power Point #5John Paul Tabakian
This document provides an overview of several topics discussed in Dr. Tabakian's Political Science 7 course on modern world governments, including: liberal institutionalism and international regimes; collective security; the waning of war; peace studies; democratic peace theory; and feminist approaches to international relations. Key theorists discussed include Kant, Keohane, Nye, and Wendt. The document also summarizes perspectives on gender in war and peace, and the roles and impacts of women in international relations.
3 Approaches in International RelationsWai-Kwok Wong
This document discusses three approaches to understanding international relations: realism, idealism, and radicalism. Realism views international politics as a struggle for power between nation-states based on self-interest. Idealism believes cooperation between nation-states and international organizations can promote peace and harmony. Radicalism sees international relations as being defined by conflicts between dominant social classes and nation-states on a global scale. No single approach can perfectly explain the complexity of world politics, and different aspects of each may apply depending on the issue and context.
This document provides an overview and critique of realism and liberalism as international relations theories. It notes that realism views states as rational actors seeking power and security, with a competitive human nature. Realism is criticized for ignoring non-state actors and non-military forces. Liberalism emphasizes interaction between states and other actors as leading to a more cooperative world, but is critiqued for downplaying the importance of wars and reducing predictability. The document concludes by framing an evaluation of structural realism and liberalism, suggesting strengths and weaknesses be weighed with supporting evidence.
Theories of International Relations essayNatasha Alves
This document discusses and compares classical realism and neorealism as international relations theories. It defines the key differences between the two approaches, including that classical realism views power as an end in itself driven by human nature, while neorealism sees power as a means to ensure state survival in an anarchic system. The document uses the 2003 US invasion of Iraq as a case study to illustrate how classical realism and neorealism would explain the motivation for the invasion differently, with classical realism focusing more on individual leaders and neorealism emphasizing structural factors of maintaining a balance of power. Overall, the document argues that while classical realism and neorealism share realist assumptions, there are significant
The document discusses the concept of balance of power in international relations. It provides definitions from various scholars throughout history. Some key points:
1) Balance of power refers to a state of equilibrium or distribution of power among states so that no single state can dominate the others and impose its will.
2) Scholars have defined it as both an equality of power distribution as well as a disequilibrium, with states preferring a balance in their own favor.
3) It has been used to describe a policy, system, status, and symbol in international politics throughout the ages from the 15th to 19th centuries.
4) There is no universal agreement on its precise meaning as it can refer to
International Relations Theory outlines three main perspectives - Realism, Liberalism, and Constructivism. Realism views states as seeking power and security above all else, competing in a zero-sum system. Liberalism acknowledges other actors beyond states and believes cooperation is possible. Constructivism sees states' interests shaped by their unique histories and cultures. The document recommends blending theories, as no single perspective can fully explain complex international dynamics.
1. The document discusses the key differences between neorealism and neoliberal institutionalism, also known as liberal institutionalism.
2. Neorealism, as developed by Kenneth Waltz, focuses on international structure defined by anarchy and the distribution of power among states. States are concerned with relative gains and cooperate only when it is in their security interests.
3. Neoliberal institutionalism, developed by Robert Keohane and Joseph Nye, sees institutions as facilitating cooperation by coordinating policy responses, reinforcing reciprocity, and punishing defection. It emphasizes complex interdependence and transnational links between states and non-state actors.
The document discusses some of the hidden dangers of using Facebook based on an expert's analysis. It outlines 5 main risks: 1) personal information being shared with third parties through applications and connections; 2) privacy settings reverting to less safe defaults with site redesigns; 3) ads potentially containing malware; 4) friends unintentionally exposing personal information; and 5) profile information retention even after deleting accounts. The expert warns that Facebook's business practices sometimes compromise users' privacy for marketing goals.
The document outlines the Heidelberg Institute for International Conflict Research's (HIIKR) definition of political conflict and their methodology for measuring conflict intensity on a scale from dispute to war. A political conflict involves at least two assertive actors with opposing positions on issues relevant to a society, carried out through observable measures outside of established procedures that threaten core state functions or international order. The HIIKR system classifies conflicts as disputes, non-violent crises, violent crises, limited wars, or wars based on the level of physical violence used and the consequences of conflict measures.
This document summarizes key concepts in international relations theory, comparing realist and liberal perspectives. It discusses concepts like anarchy, sovereignty, self-help, and the security dilemma from a realist viewpoint. Liberal concepts discussed include Kantian ideals of democracy, trade, and international institutions promoting cooperation. Realists are skeptical that institutions can significantly influence state behavior motivated by power and national interests in an anarchic system.
Classical realism in International RelationsAdnan Munir
Classical realism views international relations as rooted in human nature and the pursuit of power. Theorists like Thucydides saw states acting to determine others based on their relative power. Machiavelli advised rulers to be cunning and ruthless to ensure their state's survival. Hobbes believed the international system was anarchic and states were in a perpetual state of war due to the human lust for power. Morgenthau also saw the pursuit of power as the driving force behind conflicts between states. Classical realists reject moralist approaches and see national interests defined by the quest for power.
Realism is the most dominant school of thought in international relations. It views states as unitary, rational actors concerned with military security above all else. Realists believe human nature is selfish and states are inherently aggressive or obsessed with security. Key realist theorists include Thucydides, Machiavelli, Hobbes, E.H. Carr, and Hans Morgenthau. Realism values maintaining the status quo and is criticized for ignoring non-state actors and other forces like ethics.
This document provides biographical information on several political philosophers and theorists including Niccolo Machiavelli, Carl von Clausewitz, Hans Morgenthau, and Thomas Hobbes. It outlines their key works and contributions to the development of political realism as a theory of international relations. Machiavelli is described as the "father of modern political theory" while Clausewitz introduced important concepts in his work On War. Morgenthau helped define the principles of political realism and Hobbes wrote Leviathan, which established fundamentals of liberal political thought.
How to implement meeting decisions successfullyibrahimkoncak
This presentation is on implementing meeting decisions at institutions of any kind. It answers two fundamental questions; Why are some decisions not implemented and How can this be reversed?
In this presentation, a sample of teacher evaluation by students demonstrated. The questions are in English and Russian. The presentation aims to promote better education.
The Communist Party of China plays a central role in making Chinese foreign policy. Key decision making bodies include the Politburo Standing Committee, which has 7 members each overseeing a specific portfolio, and the State Council. The General Secretary of the Communist Party, who is also the head of the military, oversees foreign policy. Foreign policy decisions also involve the Ministries of Foreign Affairs and State Council, though the military and security apparatus can be more influential at times. Decision making aims to achieve consensus among political elites in Beijing.
The English school of International Relations ibrahimkoncak
The English School occupies a middle ground in international relations theory by synthesizing concepts from different theories without dichotomies. It examines international society through the lenses of international system, international society, and world society. International society exists when states recognize common interests and rules in their relations. The expansion of international society over time has included more states and addressed human rights. Debates continue around pluralism versus solidarism in enforcing human rights and intervention.
This presentation is on Turkish Foreign Policy between 1923 and 1939, during Kemal Ataturk's period. It explains the central themes of foreign policy and achievements.
The presentation is on neoliberalism in international relations. The emergence of neoliberalism and convergence and difference of neoliberalism and structural realism as well as barriers to international cooperation is presented.
This document provides suggestions for planning an open day to market a BA program in PNG Studies and International Relations. It recommends focusing on the unique elements of the program and university to attract students. Charts detailing theories and concepts do not need to be used - the focus should be on explaining the units and strands of the program. Videos can be created using Camtasia to help with marketing. It also includes the course structure breakdown by year and strands for the Bachelor of Arts program.
DEPARTMENT OF PNG STUDIES AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONSVictor lee DANIEL
This document is a summary of the 2016 open day for the Department of PNG Studies and International Relations Politics Strand. It lists the team leader, Victor Lee Daniel, and 23 students who have signed up, including their name, year level, and sex. It notes that the topics for discussion have yet to be confirmed due to late changes to the strands. The team leader will consult with Mr. Kuias and Fr. Harry to determine appropriate politics topics and units. Students will be informed via email and notices as to when the meeting will take place and are urged to check their emails and the notice boards for updates.
The document discusses reforms and district development plans in Papua New Guinea. It provides an overview of the reforms, which abolished joint district planning committees and created new District Development Authorities in each district. The reforms aimed to decentralize governance and improve local service delivery. Key changes included increasing district-level funding, building infrastructure, and establishing district treasuries. The District Development Authorities are now responsible for district planning, budgeting, and developing district plans to improve outcomes for rural villagers. While reforms have helped development many districts, continued partnership between provincial and district authorities is still needed.
The document summarizes information about Papua New Guinea's electoral system and 2017 national elections. It discusses that PNG has a parliamentary democracy with 111 members elected every 5 years. Members are chosen from both single-member constituencies and provinces. It provides details on the country's use of different voting systems over time, statistics from past elections, and roles of political parties in the electoral process. The 2017 national elections were scheduled to be held concurrently with local elections from April to July 2017.
This document outlines the key concepts in legal and constitutional study. It discusses the nature of law and different legal systems. It also examines the institutions that enforce laws such as the judiciary, legislature, and executive. Constitutional law defines the relationship between government entities. Legislation consists of written rules in a constitution and different legal systems. Jurisdiction refers to the power to make legal decisions. The document also outlines the levels of courts in a legal system from higher to lower courts. Finally, it explores international law and how it regulates relations between countries.
1) The document discusses the debate between offensive realism and defensive realism, with offensive realism arguing that states inherently seek hegemony due to anarchy while defensive realism argues for restraint and balance of power.
2) It presents John Mearsheimer as a proponent of offensive realism, claiming states will always seek more power and dominate the international system.
3) However, the document argues China's policies of maintaining its perimeter and limited military capabilities contradict offensive realism and instead support defensive realism or suggest limitations of both theories in explaining China's strategy.
Globalization refers to the increasing interconnectedness and interdependence of countries and peoples around the world through increased trade and cultural exchange. It is enabled by improvements in transportation and telecommunications technologies that allow for greater movement of people, capital, goods, and ideas. While globalization has economic benefits and increases access to information, it also has environmental, social, and political impacts. For small island nations in the Pacific, globalization contributes to problems like climate change, economic inequality, and loss of cultural autonomy.
Actors, Structures and Foreign Policy Analysis
International Ataturk Alatoo University, Department of International Relations, Political Science, Foreign Policy Analysis, Central Asia, Kyrgyzstan, Bishkek, IAAU,Международный Ататюрк Алатоо университет, факультет международных отношений, политологии, анализ внешней политики, Центральной Азии, Кыргызстан, Бишкек
The document discusses Mongolia's changing legislative environment for foreign investment. It notes that Mongolia has amended 66 laws and passed 16 new laws in the first three months of 2013, with many more laws related to foreign investment, minerals, securities, and other areas still under consideration. The document outlines some of the key changes and uncertainties in Mongolia's Foreign Investment Law and minerals law and recommends that foreign investors navigate these changes carefully. It also recommends that Mongolia establish a working group including industry and advisors to provide more clarity and stability to the legislative environment.
This document provides a summary of business and economic news from Mongolia. It discusses Russians looking to invest in the Tavan Tolgoi coal deposit, the introduction of e-ticketing by Eznis Airways, and South Korean interest in investing in Mongolia's mining, infrastructure and energy sectors. It also covers the suspension of 66 companies by the Financial Regulatory Committee, plans to build a new international airport outside Ulaanbaatar with Japanese funding, and the implementation of a national registration system to modernize Mongolia's economy and management of citizens.
The document summarizes the key tenets of realism in US foreign policy according to Patrick Kallahan's book "Logics of American Foreign Policy". The main points of realism are that international relations is inherently a competition for power, military power is essential for national security, and foreign policy should maintain the balance of power. Realism also holds that morality has no place in foreign relations and states primarily act in their own self-interest. The document then discusses different branches and strategies of realism, such as internal balancing and external balancing, and provides examples of how realism has influenced US foreign policy throughout history.
Theories of International Relations and it's detailsnafissadique84
This document provides an overview of theories of international relations, focusing on different forms of realism. It discusses key realist thinkers from Sun Tzu to Hans Morgenthau and their view that states must pursue power in an anarchic international system where morality has no role. It also summarizes different types of realism, including classical realism, neorealism focusing on the structure of the international system, and offensive and defensive realism regarding how military capabilities impact state behavior. Neoclassical realism is presented as combining structural insights with ideas about differences between individual states.
This document discusses different perspectives on the concept of power in international relations. It begins by defining power as a state's ability to influence or control other states. It then outlines two main traditions for analyzing power: the national power approach, which equates power with material resources, and the relational power approach, which sees power as the ability to influence another's behavior. The document also discusses various theorists' perspectives on power, including Joseph Nye's concepts of hard, soft, and smart power, and rules for analyzing power put forth by William Wohlforth.
The document discusses different perspectives on realism in international relations. It begins by summarizing key events related to the Bretton Woods system and the Marshall Plan. It then discusses the Melian Dialogue case study on realism and power politics. The Athenians assert their military dominance over the Melians, exemplifying realist views of power determining justice. The document defines realism as states pursuing self-interest and power in an anarchic system. It outlines the basic assumptions of realism and contrasts them with idealism. It also examines different traditions in realism through thinkers like Thucydides, Hobbes, Machiavelli, and Rousseau. The evolution and different types of realism are summarized,
Power politics arises from the anarchic nature of international relations, where states seek to balance power out of security interests. There are alternatives like world government or collective security, but both face significant challenges in implementation. Collective security aims to replace national power with collective defense, but identifying aggressors is difficult and status quo bias limits peaceful change. While anarchy leads to power politics if states assume it must, the consequences are not automatic as security communities show states can coexist without violence given different experiences. Overall the viability of alternatives to power politics is limited by what levels of change are feasible.
This document summarizes key concepts of realism in international relations through examples of war games and historical events. It contains 3 main points:
1) It outlines four main assumptions of realism: states exist in anarchy, rulers prioritize state power over ethics, relations are based on balancing power, and history provides objective political laws.
2) It discusses concepts like absolute gains vs relative gains in state actions, and uses examples like the Melian dialogue to illustrate realist theories in action.
3) It references influential realist thinkers like Machiavelli, Hobbes, and examples from history like the Battle of Thermopylae to argue that human nature is driven by seeking power according to real
This chapter discusses realism as a dominant theory of international relations. It explores different strands of realist thought including structural realism, neoclassical realism, and rational choice realism. The chapter outlines three key tenets of realism: statism which sees states as the most important actors; survival as states' primary objective; and self-help where states rely on themselves for security due to the anarchic international system. It also examines criticisms of realism and provides a case study on the Melian dialogue to illustrate realist concepts in preparation for war.
This document provides lecture highlights and summaries on realism and power theory in international relations. Some key points covered include:
- Realism views the international system as anarchic with nation-states primarily concerned with survival and power. Realists see a balance of power between states as promoting stability.
- Neo-realism focuses on how the anarchic international system shapes state behavior, rather than human nature. It views states as seeking security above power.
- Power theory holds that states pursue power as a means of survival. Power is defined as a state's capacity and resources multiplied by its compliance and divided by force. The constant pursuit of power and self-interest among states leads to ongoing political conflicts and competitions.
The document discusses key concepts in international politics and international law, including:
1) Concepts such as power, models which theoretically represent empirical data, and theories which systematically explain practical data.
2) Theories of international politics including realism, pluralism, Marxism, and idealism. Realism views politics through power politics while idealism focuses on legal norms.
3) Elements of power for states including demographic, geographic, economic, military, and leadership factors. Location, size, and climate affect a state's geographic power.
4) Models for analyzing international politics, such as the power politics model which focuses on competition, and political interdependence which recognizes state interdependence.
Realism is the most dominant school of thought in international relations. It views states as unitary, rational actors focused on military power and security above all else. Realists believe human nature is selfish and states are inherently aggressive or obsessed with security. Key realist theorists include Thucydides, Machiavelli, Hobbes, E.H. Carr, and Hans Morgenthau. Realism values maintaining the status quo and is criticized for ignoring non-state actors and other forces like ethics.
The document provides an overview of realism and idealism in international relations. [1] Realism emphasizes that nation-states are motivated by national interests and pursue power, while idealism stresses peace and cooperation between states. [2] The document outlines the key assumptions and types of realism, and discusses thinkers like Thomas Hobbes and the Peloponnesian War. [3] It also defines idealism as promoting universal ethics, peace, and limiting the use of military force between states.
Power is a key concept in realist theory. Realism sees the international system as anarchic and states as primarily concerned with their own security and survival. Power is defined both theoretically as a state's ability to influence others, and empirically based on tangible factors like military and economic strength. Anarchy means there is no overarching authority and each state is responsible for its own security. States act to maintain a balance of power to prevent any single state from dominating. Alliances are formed to balance growing powers. Hard power uses coercion and force while soft power uses appeal and norms, and smart power strategically combines both. Power can be distributed unipolarly, bipolarly, or multipolarly in the international system.
This document summarizes different models of political power structures, including pluralist and elitist models. It discusses theories put forth by Wright Mills, Domhoff, and Parenti regarding the existence of a political power elite composed of leaders from government, the military, and large corporations. The document also contrasts order and conflict perspectives on the distribution of power in society and states that decisions made by those in power tend to disproportionately benefit the wealthy.
This document discusses key concepts related to states, including:
- The state is defined as having a monopoly on violence over a territory and sovereignty. It provides security and turns political ideas into policy through institutions.
- Regimes establish the proper relations between freedom and equality and use of power. Governments operate the state machinery.
- States vary in their centralization, legitimacy derived from tradition, charisma or rational-legal means, and capacity and autonomy in wielding power independently.
- Comparisons can be made between strong states with high capacity and autonomy that can easily enact policies, and weak states with limitations.
Similar to Structural realist vocabulary for beginners (20)
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRMCeline George
Odoo 17 CRM allows us to track why we lose sales opportunities with "Lost Reasons." This helps analyze our sales process and identify areas for improvement. Here's how to configure lost reasons in Odoo 17 CRM
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold MethodCeline George
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
2. TERMS OF REALISM
• Power: Ability to make others do (or not do) what you want them to do.
• Structural Realism: Also, called as neorealism, system analysis of
International Relations or third level analysis.
• Great Powers: The main actors in the realist account or big states in terms of
military and economic power such as the USA, China, Russia etc.
• Balance of power: Theory in International Relations suggest that national
security is enhanced when military capability distributed so that no one state
is strong enough to dominate others. Example; Concert of Europe
3. TERMS OF STRUCTURAL REALISM
• Regime type: it is not important for realist the regime of a state, state is state and actions of
a state is determined by structure which is anarchic, or no central authority- no world
government.
• Black Boxes: Structural realists treats states as if they were black boxes that is who makes
decisions in a states is not important, they tend not to see what is inside state in terms of
foreign policy decisions. State behave alike only some states are more or less powerful than
others.
• Defensive Realists: Theorists such as Kenneth Waltz (Theory of International Politics 1979) who
claims that it is unwise for states to try to maximize their share of world power, because the
system will punish them if they attempt to gain too much power.
4. • Offensive Realists: Theorists such as John Mearsheimer (The Tragedy of Great
Power Politics,2001) who maintain that it makes good strategic sense for states
to gain as much power as possible and, if the circumstances are right, to
pursue hegemony. Overwhelming power is the best way to ensure one’s own
survival.
• Latent power: A kind of power. Socioeconomic ingredients, state’s wealth,
the size of overall population, that go into building military power. Raw
potential. Latent power which China has gained over the last few decades.
5. TERMS OF STRUCTURAL REALISM
• Five assumptions: Neorealist assumptions which shape world politics when all
combined.
• Anarchy: Ordering principle, there is no centralized authority or ultimate arbiter
that stands above states. Opposite is hierarchy, ordering principle in domestic
politics.
• Revisionist states: States that are determined to use force to alter the balance of
power.
• Status quo states: States that satisfied enough with balance of power that they have
no interest in using force to change it.
6. TERMS OF STRUCTURAL REALISM
• Rational choice: Calculating costs and benefits carefully when making foreign policy
decisions.
• Self-help world: States have to rely on themselves to ensure their survival.
• Tragedy of great power politics: States to survive have little choice but to assume
the worst about the intentions of other states and to compete for power with them.
• Security Dilemma: A situation in which steps a great power takes to enhance its own
security decrease the security of others leading perpetual security competition.
7. TERMS OF STRUCTURAL REALISM
• International Community: Not so much important in neorealist thought.
state interest is far more important than interests of international
community.
• Hegemony: leadership or dominance, especially when one country dominates
all others in international system only then can ensure survival.
• Balancing: Defensive realist claim that when a states becomes too powerful
other states get into alliances and may weaken or destroy the hegemon.
8. TERMS OF STRUCTURAL REALISM
• offence-defense balance: The defensive realist argument about whether conquest
pays or not
• Central Wars: Conflicts involving all or almost all great powers
• Security Dilemma: the paradox that occurs when a state seek to improve its own
security, resulting in the decreased security of other states. At the hard of security
dilemma is the idea that security is a relative concept: all actors cannot have more of
it.
• Buck-passing: When a state in balancing coalition attempt to get other states to
assume the burden of checking powerful opponent while it remains on the sidelines.
9. TERMS OF STRUCTURAL REALISM
• Deterrence: Deterrence is a strategy intended to dissuade an adversary from
taking an action not yet started, or to prevent them from doing something
that another state desires.
• Preponderant power: superior, satisfied major state in the system