Misuse of psychologist's Work
Conflict between ethics and law, regulation or other Governing legal authority
Conflict between ethics and organizational demands
Informal resolution of ethical violations
Reporting ethical violations
Cooperating with ethics committee
Improper complaints
Unfair discrimination against complaints and respondents
There are many different kinds of ethical issues facing clinical psychologists. Some of the most common ones involve confidentiality, payments, relationships, and testimony.
There are many different kinds of ethical issues facing clinical psychologists. Some of the most common ones involve confidentiality, payments, relationships, and testimony.
Ethics, a very important part of psychological research which play major role in the conduction of psychological research it's about the moral values and social norms which applies to all Researchers and there are a comprehensive guidelines about ethics given by American Psychological Association 2013 listed in this presentation.
This is a presentation regarding Albert Ellis' REBT. Ellis' model teaches us to dispute irrational beliefs and replace them with rational ones to experience effective change.
Ethics, a very important part of psychological research which play major role in the conduction of psychological research it's about the moral values and social norms which applies to all Researchers and there are a comprehensive guidelines about ethics given by American Psychological Association 2013 listed in this presentation.
This is a presentation regarding Albert Ellis' REBT. Ellis' model teaches us to dispute irrational beliefs and replace them with rational ones to experience effective change.
READINGSIntroductionUnit II examines ethical, legal, and .docxsedgar5
READINGS:
Introduction
Unit II
examines ethical, legal, and legislative issues affecting leadership and management as well as professional advocacy. This chapter focuses on applied ethical decision making as a critical leadership role for managers.
Chapter 5
examines the impact of legislation and the law on leadership and management, and
Chapter 6
focuses on advocacy for patients and subordinates and for the nursing profession in general.
Ethics
is the systematic study of what a person’s conduct and actions should be with regard to self, other human beings, and the environment; it is the justification of what is right or good and the study of what a person’s life and relationships should be, not necessarily what they are. Ethics is a system of moral conduct and principles that guide a person’s actions in regard to right and wrong and in regard to oneself and society at large.
Ethics is concerned with doing the right thing, although it is not always clear what that is.
Applied ethics
requires application of normative ethical theory to everyday problems. The normative ethical theory for each profession arises from the purpose of the profession. The values and norms of the nursing profession, therefore, provide the foundation and filter from which ethical decisions are made. The nurse-manager, however, has a different ethical responsibility than the clinical nurse and does not have as clearly defined a foundation to use as a base for ethical reasoning.
In addition, because management is a discipline and not a profession, its purpose is not as clearly defined as medicine or law; therefore, the norms that guide ethical decision making are less clear. Instead, the organization reflects norms and values to the manager, and the personal values of managers are reflected through the organization. The manager’s ethical obligation is tied to the organization’s purpose, and the purpose of the organization is linked to the function that it fills in society and the constraints society places on it. So, the responsibilities of the nurse-manager emerge from a complex set of interactions.
Society helps define the purposes of various institutions, and the purposes, in turn, help ensure that the institution fulfills specific functions. However, the specific values and norms in any institution determine the focus of its resources and shape its organizational life. The values of people within institutions influence actual management practice. In reviewing this set of complex interactions, it becomes evident that arriving at appropriate ethical management decisions can be a difficult task.
In addition,
nursing management ethics
are distinct from
clinical nursing ethics
. Although significant research exists regarding ethical dilemmas and moral distress experienced by staff nurses in clinical roles, less research exists regarding the ethical distress experienced by nursing managers.
Nursing management ethics are also distinct from other areas of m.
This is a companion Powerpoint to Ethics & Psychology Podcast on ethical decision-making.
The importance of this podcast and Episode 5 is to set up vignette analysis in future podcasts. Everyone needs to be on the same page in order to apply ethical decision-making in instructional or real life situations.
PART1-Due ThursdayRespond to the following in a minimum of.docxJUST36
PART1-
D
ue Thursday
Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:
Review this week’s course materials and learning activities, and reflect on your learning so far this week. Respond to one or more of the following prompts in one to two paragraphs:
Provide citation and reference to the material(s) you discuss. Describe what you found interesting regarding this topic, and why.
Describe how you will apply that learning in your daily life, including your work life.
Describe what may be unclear to you, and what you would like to learn.
PART2-
University of Phoenix Material
Case Study Two Worksheet
Respond to the following questions in 1,250 to 1,500 words.
1. Why is this an ethical dilemma? Which APA Ethical Principles help frame the nature of the dilemma?
2. How might Irina’s age and parents’ involvement in the referral affect how Dr. Matthews can resolve the dilemma? How might the state law on treatment of minors and HIPAA rule on access of guardians to a minor’s health care record influence Dr. Matthews’ decision?
3. How are APA Ethical Standards 2.01a b, and c; 2.04; 3.04; 3.06; 4.01; 4.02; and 10.10a relevant to this case? Which other standards might apply?
4. What are Dr. Matthews’ ethical alternatives for resolving this dilemma? Which alternative best reflects the Ethics Code aspirational principle and enforceable standard, as well as legal standards and Dr. Matthews’ obligations to stakeholders?
5. What steps should Dr. Matthews take to ethically implement her decision and monitor its effects?
PART3-
Write
a 300-word or more paper in which you examine the legal aspects of record keeping and providing expert testimony. As part of your examination, address the following items:
Evaluate the legal issues associated with assessment, testing, and diagnosis documentation in professional psychology
Fisher, C. B. (2013).
Decoding the ethics code: A practical guide for psychologists
. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
REFERENCE FOR PART 1
Psychologists aspire to promote accuracy, honesty, and truthfulness in the science, teaching, and practice of psychology and do not engage in subterfuge or intentional misrepresentation of fact (Principle C: Integrity). Standard 5.01a of the APA Ethics Code (APA, 2010b) prohibits false, deceptive, or fraudulent public statements regarding work activities or the activities of persons or organizations with which psychologists are affiliated.
The terms
avoidance
and
knowingly
exclude as violations statements that psychologists would reasonably be expected to believe are true but that they may later learn are false.
☑ A psychologist in a group practice distributed brochures with a listing of the group members’ credentials, only to discover that one member had submitted false credentials. She ceased distribution and ordered a corrected brochure.
☑ A research psychologist gave a public lecture, a series of media interviews, and congressional testimony during which he publicly .
WAL_PSYC3011_01_A_EN-CC.mp4ETHICAL PRINCIPLES OF PSYCH.docxjessiehampson
WAL_PSYC3011_01_A_EN-CC.mp4
ETHICAL PRINCIPLES
OF PSYCHOLOGISTS
AND
CODE OF CONDUCT
Printed in the United States of America
Adopted August 21, 2002
Effective June 1, 2003
(With the 2010 Amendments
to Introduction and Applicability
and Standards 1.02 and 1.03,
Effective June 1, 2010)
With the 2016 Amendment
to Standard 3.04
Adopted August 3, 2016
Effective January 1, 2017
INTRODUCTION AND APPLICABILITY
PREAMBLE
GENERAL PRINCIPLES
Principle A: Beneficence
and Nonmaleficence
Principle B: Fidelity and Responsibility
Principle C: Integrity
Principle D: Justice
Principle E: Respect for People’s Rights
and Dignity
ETHICAL STANDARDS
1. Resolving Ethical Issues
1.01 Misuse of Psychologists’ Work
1.02 Conflicts Between Ethics and Law,
Regulations, or Other Governing
Legal Authority
1.03 Conflicts Between Ethics and
Organizational Demands
1.04 Informal Resolution of Ethical
Violations
1.05 Reporting Ethical Violations
1.06 Cooperating With Ethics Committees
1.07 Improper Complaints
1.08 Unfair Discrimination Against
Complainants and Respondents
2. Competence
2.01 Boundaries of Competence
2.02 Providing Services in Emergencies
2.03 Maintaining Competence
2.04 Bases for Scientific and Professional
Judgments
2.05 Delegation of Work to Others
2.06 Personal Problems and Conflicts
3. Human Relations
3.01 Unfair Discrimination
3.02 Sexual Harassment
3.03 Other Harassment
3.04 Avoiding Harm
3.05 Multiple Relationships
3.06 Conflict of Interest
3.07 Third-Party Requests for Services
3.08 Exploitative Relationships
3.09 Cooperation With Other
Professionals
3.10 Informed Consent
3.11 Psychological Services Delivered to
or Through Organizations
3.12 Interruption of Psychological Services
4. Privacy and Confidentiality
4.01 Maintaining Confidentiality
4.02 Discussing the Limits of
Confidentiality
4.03 Recording
4.04 Minimizing Intrusions on Privacy
4.05 Disclosures
4.06 Consultations
4.07 Use of Confidential Information
for Didactic or Other Purposes
5. Advertising and Other Public
Statements
5.01 Avoidance of False or Deceptive
Statements
5.02 Statements by Others
5.03 Descriptions of Workshops and
Non-Degree-Granting Educational
Programs
5.04 Media Presentations
5.05 Testimonials
5.06 In-Person Solicitation
6. Record Keeping and Fees
6.01 Documentation of Professional
and Scientific Work and
Maintenance of Records
6.02 Maintenance, Dissemination,
and Disposal of Confidential Records
of Professional and Scientific Work
6.03 Withholding Records for
Nonpayment
6.04 Fees and Financial Arrangements
6.05 Barter With Clients/Patients
6.06 Accuracy in Reports to Payors and
Funding Sources
6.07 Referrals and Fees
7. Education and Training
7.01 Design of Education and Training
Programs
7.02 Descriptions of Education and
Training Programs
7.03 Accuracy in Teaching
7.04 Student Disclosure of Personal
Information
7.05 Mandatory Indiv ...
Similar to Standard for Resolving ethical issues (20)
Senior Project and Engineering Leader Jim Smith.pdfJim Smith
I am a Project and Engineering Leader with extensive experience as a Business Operations Leader, Technical Project Manager, Engineering Manager and Operations Experience for Domestic and International companies such as Electrolux, Carrier, and Deutz. I have developed new products using Stage Gate development/MS Project/JIRA, for the pro-duction of Medical Equipment, Large Commercial Refrigeration Systems, Appliances, HVAC, and Diesel engines.
My experience includes:
Managed customized engineered refrigeration system projects with high voltage power panels from quote to ship, coordinating actions between electrical engineering, mechanical design and application engineering, purchasing, production, test, quality assurance and field installation. Managed projects $25k to $1M per project; 4-8 per month. (Hussmann refrigeration)
Successfully developed the $15-20M yearly corporate capital strategy for manufacturing, with the Executive Team and key stakeholders. Created project scope and specifications, business case, ROI, managed project plans with key personnel for nine consumer product manufacturing and distribution sites; to support the company’s strategic sales plan.
Over 15 years of experience managing and developing cost improvement projects with key Stakeholders, site Manufacturing Engineers, Mechanical Engineers, Maintenance, and facility support personnel to optimize pro-duction operations, safety, EHS, and new product development. (BioLab, Deutz, Caire)
Experience working as a Technical Manager developing new products with chemical engineers and packaging engineers to enhance and reduce the cost of retail products. I have led the activities of multiple engineering groups with diverse backgrounds.
Great experience managing the product development of products which utilize complex electrical controls, high voltage power panels, product testing, and commissioning.
Created project scope, business case, ROI for multiple capital projects to support electrotechnical assembly and CPG goods. Identified project cost, risk, success criteria, and performed equipment qualifications. (Carrier, Electrolux, Biolab, Price, Hussmann)
Created detailed projects plans using MS Project, Gant charts in excel, and updated new product development in Jira for stakeholders and project team members including critical path.
Great knowledge of ISO9001, NFPA, OSHA regulations.
User level knowledge of MRP/SAP, MS Project, Powerpoint, Visio, Mastercontrol, JIRA, Power BI and Tableau.
I appreciate your consideration, and look forward to discussing this role with you, and how I can lead your company’s growth and profitability. I can be contacted via LinkedIn via phone or E Mail.
Jim Smith
678-993-7195
jimsmith30024@gmail.com
Artificial intelligence (AI) offers new opportunities to radically reinvent the way we do business. This study explores how CEOs and top decision makers around the world are responding to the transformative potential of AI.
The case study discusses the potential of drone delivery and the challenges that need to be addressed before it becomes widespread.
Key takeaways:
Drone delivery is in its early stages: Amazon's trial in the UK demonstrates the potential for faster deliveries, but it's still limited by regulations and technology.
Regulations are a major hurdle: Safety concerns around drone collisions with airplanes and people have led to restrictions on flight height and location.
Other challenges exist: Who will use drone delivery the most? Is it cost-effective compared to traditional delivery trucks?
Discussion questions:
Managerial challenges: Integrating drones requires planning for new infrastructure, training staff, and navigating regulations. There are also marketing and recruitment considerations specific to this technology.
External forces vary by country: Regulations, consumer acceptance, and infrastructure all differ between countries.
Demographics matter: Younger generations might be more receptive to drone delivery, while older populations might have concerns.
Stakeholders for Amazon: Customers, regulators, aviation authorities, and competitors are all stakeholders. Regulators likely hold the greatest influence as they determine the feasibility of drone delivery.
The Team Member and Guest Experience - Lead and Take Care of your restaurant team. They are the people closest to and delivering Hospitality to your paying Guests!
Make the call, and we can assist you.
408-784-7371
Foodservice Consulting + Design
Oprah Winfrey: A Leader in Media, Philanthropy, and Empowerment | CIO Women M...CIOWomenMagazine
This person is none other than Oprah Winfrey, a highly influential figure whose impact extends beyond television. This article will delve into the remarkable life and lasting legacy of Oprah. Her story serves as a reminder of the importance of perseverance, compassion, and firm determination.
Oprah Winfrey: A Leader in Media, Philanthropy, and Empowerment | CIO Women M...
Standard for Resolving ethical issues
1. STANDARD FOR RESOLVING
ETHICAL ISSUES
Presented by: Rabia Batool (156)
Nadia Azhar (157)
Tayyaba Aurangzaib (163)
Javeria Farooq (159)
2. 1. Resolving Ethical Issues
1.01 Misuse of psychologist’s Work
1.02 Conflict between Ethics and Law, Regulation or other
Governing Legal Authority
1.03 Conflicts between Ethics and Organizational Demands
1.04 Informal Resolution of Ethical Violations
1.08 Unfair Discriminations against complainants and Respondents
1.07 Improper Complaints
1.06 Cooperating with Ethics Committees
1.05 Reporting Ethical Violations
3. 1.01 Misuse of psychologist work
If psychologist learn of misuse or mis-representation of their
work, they take reasonable steps to correct or minimize the
misuse or misrepresentation.
Psychologist have professional and scientific responsibilities
to society and to the specific individuals, organization and
communities with whom they work to ensure that their work
products are not misused.
Psychologist would be aware of misuse of mis-
interpenetration of their work, a claim of ignorance would
not be an acceptable defense against a charge of violation.
4. Case Study
A school psychologist completed a report summarizing
her assessment of a child whose test result did not
clearly meet diagnostic criteria for serious emotional
disturbance. several days later, she learned that the
principle of her school had forwarded to the
superintendent of school only parts of the assessment
report that supported the principles desired to classify
the student as emotionally disturbed to fill a special
education quota, the psychologist asked the principle
to send the entire report, explaining the ethical issue
involved.
5. 1.02 Conflict between ethics and law,
regulation or other governing legal authority
If psychologist ethical responsibilities conflict with law,
regulations or other governing legal authority, psychologist
make know their commitment to the ethics code and take step
to resolve the conflict. If the conflict is unresolvable via such
means, psychologists may adhere to the requirements of the
laws, regulations, or other governing legal authority.
6. Case Study
A psychologist who had received a court order for
confidential information sent a letter to the judge
explaining the relevant confidentially standards in
the ethics code and requesting judicial review to
determine whether a limited release of information
world meet legal requirements.
7. 1.03 Conflicts between Ethics and
Organizational Demands
If the demands of the organization with which the
psychologist is affiliated or for whom they are working
conflicts with ethical code, psychologist clarify the nature
of the conflict, make known their commitment to the
ethics code, and to the extinct feasible, resolve the
conflict in a way that permits adherence to ethics code.
8. Explanation
If an organization’s rules conflict with the ethical code
values of the psychologist in any way, the psychologist
takes steps to:
Clarify the ethical concerns.
Take reasonable steps to solve this clash.
Stick to his psychological ethical code to extinct possible.
The phrase “to the extinct feasible” recognizes that
despite reasonable efforts by psychologist if the conflict
does not resolves, the psychologist is not required to
resign the job on this basis.
9. Case study
An industrial psychologist recently employed by an
organization to handle employment testing discovers
that the testimonials being used for screening of
employs was not authentic and not clearly job
related. He describes the problem to the
superintendent and provides a specific, realistic plan
for helping the employer move toward an ethical and
legally defensible screening process.
10. 1.04 Informal Resolution of Ethical Violations
When psychologists believe that there may have been
an ethical violation by another psychologist, they
attempt to resolve the issue by bringing it to the
attention of that individual, if an informal resolution
appears appropriate and the intervention does not
violate any confidentiality rights that may be involved.
11. Explanation
This standard requires psychologists to attempt an
informal resolution when they suspect that any ethical
violation has occurred.
This could be done through discussion with the violating
psychologist.
If appropriate, the recommended corrective steps could
also be discussed to prevent future ethical violations.
Informal resolution may not be appropriate and
ineffective in some situations.
If attempting to informal resolution violates individual’s
confidentiality, then it should not be attempted.
12. Case study
A professor of psychology had not established a
timely, specific process for providing feedback to
and evaluating student performance. After
discussion with the department chair, the professor
agreed to developed such a plan.
13. 1.05 Reporting Ethical Violations
If an apparent ethical violation has substantially harm a
person or organization and is not appropriate for informal
resolution. Most ethical violation causing substantial harm
depends on the professional or scientific context and the
individuals involved. Behaviors likely to cause substantial
harm include; sexual misconduct, insurance fraud,
plagiarism, and intentional misrepresentation.
14. Case Study
A psychology professor reviewing an assistant professors
promotion application materials discovered that the faculty
members had several publications that blatantly plagiarized
articles written by a senior colleague. The psychologist
presented the evidence to the chair of the department. The
chair and the professor informed the faculty member that
they had discovered the plagiarism and would be forwarding
information to the university committee on the ethical
conduct, and if the committee found that plagiarism had
occurred , would inform the journal in which the articles
were published.
15. 1.06 Cooperating with Ethics
Committees
Psychologist cooperate in ethics investigations,
proceedings, and resulting requirements of the APA
or any affiliated psychological association to which
they belong. In doing so they address any
confidentiality issues. Failure to cooperate is itself
an ethics violation.
16. Case Study
A patient submitted a complaint to the APA charging a
psychologist with misinterpreting the results of an
assessment battery leading to inaccurate diagnosis and
denial of disability. To fully respond to the complaint, the
psychologist needed to obtain the patients written release
so that the psychologist could submit to the ethics
committee the test report and other information about the
patient relevant to the complaint. Despite reasonable
efforts, the patients refused to sign the release. The
psychologist informed the APA ethics committee about the
confidentiality limitations on fully responding to the
committees request.
17. Psychologists do not file or encourage the filing of ethics
complaints that are made with reckless disregard for or
willful ignorance of facts that would disprove the
allegation.
1.07 Improper Complaints
18. Explanation
The filing of irrelevant complaints intended solely to harm
the respondent undermines the educative , adjudicative,
and public protection purposes of ethics code.
unfounded and revengeful complains
Feelings of hostility and intent to harm
The language of this standard was focused on complaining
psychologist’s disregard for available information that
would disapprove allegation rather than on the personal
motives underlying the complaint.
19. Psychologists do not deny persons employment,
advancement, admissions to academic or other
programs, tenure, or promotion, based solely upon
their having made or their being the subject of an
ethics complaint. This does not preclude taking action
based upon the outcome of such proceedings or
considering other appropriate information.
1.08 Unfair Discriminations against
complainants and Respondents
20. Explanation
Situations arise in which employees ,colleagues ,students or
student applicants accuse others or are being accused of
sexual harassment or other forms of professional misconduct.
This standard protects rights of individuals to make ethical
complaints without suffering unfair severe actions from
psychologists responsible for their employ ,academic
admission or training.
Harsh actions taken against those who make such complaints
This standard makes clear that psychologists have
responsibility to be concerned about ethical compliance of
their colleagues’ professional conduct.
21. Case Study
A client accused a member of a group practice of
misrepresenting the fee for psychotherapy.
Regardless of whether psychologist was guilty or
innocent ,the group members asked the
psychologist to leave the practice.